Generic Warfarin: Implications for Clinical Practice and Perceptions of Anticoagulation Providers

Structural Changes of Sodium Warfarin in Tablets Affecting the Dissolution Profiles and Potential Safety of Generic Substitution

At present, the risk of generic substitutions in warfarin tablets is still being discussed. The aim of this study was to assess whether API interactions with commonly used excipients may affect the safety of generic replacement of warfarin sodium tablets. These interactions were observed during an accelerated stability study, and the effect of the warfarin solid phase (crystalline/amorphous form) as well as the API particle size distribution was studied. Commercial tablets and prepared tablets containing crystalline warfarin or amorphous warfarin were used. In addition, binary mixtures of warfarin with various excipients were prepared. The structural changes before and after the stability study were monitored by dissolution test in different media, solid-state NMR spectroscopy and Raman microscopy. During the stability study, the conversion of the sodium in warfarin to its acid form was demonstrated by some excipients (e.g., calcium phosphate). This change in the solid phase of warfarin leads to significant changes in dissolution, especially with the different particle sizes of the APIs in the tablet. Thus, the choice of suitable excipients and particle sizes are critical factors influencing the safety of generic warfarin sodium tablets.

Molecular Insights into Warfarin Sodium 2-Propanol Solvate Solid Form Changes and Disproportionation Using a Low Volume Two-Stage Dissolution Approach

The current research work focuses on understanding the reported discrepancies and our observations in the dissolution profiles of warfarin sodium tablets and potential patient-based failure modes during oral warfarin therapy. It was hypothesized that freely soluble crystalline warfarin sodium (WAR_C) at first transforms into noncrystalline warfarin sodium (WAR_NC) under stress conditions. The WAR_C → WAR_NC conversion facilitates the rapid formation of the poorly soluble unionized form, which could lead to dissolution failures and potential poor in vivo performance. Depressed warfarin concentrations locally in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) may in turn lead to inadequate absorption and thereby affect bioavailability. A low volume two-stage dissolution method was developed to mimic in vivo GIT conditions. Warfarin sodium tablets exposed to room temperature and 75% relative humidity for 1 week showed approximately 23% decrease in drug release. The decline in drug release supports the hypothesis that WAR_NC is converted to the unionized form faster than WAR_C does under the same conditions. Solid state characterization (powder X-ray diffractometry and differential scanning calorimetry) data demonstrated the disproportionation of warfarin sodium to unionized warfarin after solubility and dissolution studies. The findings support the hypothesis and a possible failure mode of warfarin sodium tablets. This work is a second case study from our laboratory on narrow therapeutic index drug products in which the instability of the solid state of the drug substance is potentially responsible for observed clinical failures.

Safety of dietary supplements use among patients with cancer: A systematic review

Dietary supplements (DS) are commonly taken by patients with cancer, but safety of DS use remains unclear. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and Alt HealthWatch databases from inception through October 12, 2018. Included studies were limited to clinical trials including patients with cancer, DS products as interventions, evaluation of safety endpoints of DS use, and published in English. Sixty-five studies were included to evaluate 20 different DS among patients with 12 types of cancer. Botanical DS (n = 13), vitamins (n = 8), and probiotics/synbiotics (n = 7) were the top 3 types of DS evaluated in these trials. Majority of studied DS appeared safe. Among 19 trials including patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, most (n = 18) of studied DS (e.g., vitamins, botanical, omega-3 fatty acid) were found to be safe. Evaluation of DS use and its safety should be regularly incorporated in clinical trials among patients with cancer.

Chlorogenic Acid Interaction with Cisplatin and Oxaliplatin: Studies in Cervical Carcinoma Cells

The antiproliferative effect of the naturally occurring polyphenol chlorogenic acid (CGA) was evaluated in combination with either cisplatin or oxaliplatin in human cervical carcinoma cell lines that were either sensitive (A431) or resistant to cisplatin (A431Pt), in order to provide evidence to overcome drug resistance. Cytotoxicity of platinating drugs (IC50 ~ 10−6 - 10−5 M) was enhanced by 1–2 orders of magnitude by increasing incubation times (1, 4, and 24 hours) in the two cell lines. CGA treatment presented low cytotoxicity per se (IC50 ~ 10−4 M at 24 h) if compared with platinum drugs and its activity was similar in A431Pt cells and in their sensitive A431 counterpart. The combination of the platinating drugs with CGA (10−6 - 10−4 M) indicated variable effects on cytotoxicity, ranging from potentiation to various degrees of antagonism (in A431 cells) and no effect (in A431Pt cells). In order to explain the different cytotoxic activity elicited by oxaliplatin and cisplatin in association with CGA, the possible presence of chemical interactions was investigated by HPLC analysis. The drug association with CGA caused evident changes in their chromatographic profile, suggesting occurrence of in vitro chemical interactions.

Substituting Warfarin Products: What's the Source of the Problem?

Many clinicians have expressed concerns about the bioequivalence of warfarin products, and data suggest that substituting warfarin products may increase the risk of major bleeding and thromboembolic complications. Anecdotal reports and some retrospective studies have reported differences in anticoagulation control after a warfarin product substitution. But the best available evidence—prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trials—has failed to validate these observations. Indeed, interpatient and intrapatient variability in anticoagulation control observed before and after warfarin product substitution is very similar. So, while differences in product standardization, bioavailability, and bioequivalence make a convenient explanation, the problem lies elsewhere. Perhaps poor communication, fractionated systems of care, and errors are the culprits.

Improved Stability in INR with Coumadin for a Patient Requiring Very Low Warfarin Doses

Objective:

To describe a patient who required very low doses of warfarin but who could not achieve therapeutically stable anticoagulation until treatment was switched from generic to branded warfarin.

Case Summary:

A 53-year-old male with a history of hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and mild renal insufficiency was diagnosed with atrial fibrillation during a routine examination. Anticoagulation was started with warfarin 5 mg daily. The patient presented to the anticoagulation clinic 2 days later with an international normalized ratio (INR) of 5.4 and no signs or symptoms of bleeding. Warfarin was held for 3 days until the INR was <3. Warfarin was then restarted at 2.5 mg daily. Over the next week his INR rose to 4.8; warfarin was again held and restarted at 1.5 mg/day. Although the warfarin dose was eventually titrated to 6.5 mg/wk, the INR never stabilized and the patient only had consecutive therapeutic INRs twice in 1 year and only one 3-month period with therapeutic INRs not requiring any dosage adjustments. The decision was made to switch from the generic product to Coumadin to try to improve stability. Several dosage adjustments were made over the 6 weeks following the switch before the INR was stabilized with 7 mg/wk. Subsequent INRs ranged from 2.0 to 2.2 in the 3 months after the switch, during which time INRs were measured at least weekly. Over 14 months after the switch, the patient did not have an INR outside of the therapeutic range.

Discussion:

Many patients are able to take generic warfarin without problems. However, case reports have documented occasional patients who have had problems after switching to a generic product. Large cohorts have been switched to generic warfarin without experiencing significant changes in therapeutic control. However, 1 cohort study found that patients who required very low warfarin dosages had significant changes in their INR after switching to a generic product.

Conclusions:

Patients who require very low warfarin dosages to consistently maintain therapeutic anticoagulation may experience less therapeutic stability while on a generic product.

Survey on warfarin pharmacogenetic testing among anticoagulation providers

AIMS

Our study aimed to assess anticoagulation providers' perception and knowledge of warfarin pharmacogenetic testing, and to identify barriers to using it in their clinical practice.

MATERIALS & METHODS

An online survey that included 5 perception and 5 knowledge questions about the testing was conducted on anticoagulation providers in North America. Participants were also asked to rank the three most significant barriers to using it.

RESULTS

The survey response rate was 22%. Over 40% of 448 providers participating in the study were undecided about the testing's potential clinical benefits. On average, providers correctly answered 2 out of 5 knowledge questions. Self confidence in interpreting test results significantly predicted the providers' accuracy of the interpretation. The top three barriers were inadequate literature evidence, testing's impracticality and unproven applicability.

CONCLUSION

Most of the providers did not respond to the survey. Our study suggests inadequate literature evidence influences providers' perception and their use of the testing. In addition, provider education on warfarin pharmacogenetics may be necessary for testing's widespread use.

Natural polyphenols antagonize the antimyeloma activity of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib by direct chemical interaction

Bortezomib is a therapeutic proteasome inhibitor with antimyeloma activity and polyphenols are well known compounds that exert antiproliferative effects against tumuors. We attempted to co-treat myeloma cells with bortezomib and polyphenols, anticipating a synergistic effect. However, the anticancer activity of bortezomib was blocked by the polyphenols. The structural features of the polyphenols correlated strikingly with their antagonistic effect; in particular, the presence or absence of a vicinal diol moiety was the key element for effective blockage of the anticancer function of bortezomib. We speculated that the vicinal diols in the polyphenols interact with the boronic acid of bortezomib and convert the active triangular boronic acid of bortezomib to an inactive tetrahedral boronate, thus abolishing the antimyeloma activity of bortezomib. We confirmed this hypothesis by (11)B nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and an in vitro assay on multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines and primary myeloma cells from patients. Based on these findings, restriction of the intake of natural polyphenols in foods or vitamin supplements during bortezomib treatment in MM patients should be considered.

Simulation of the AUC changes after generic substitution in patients

To address the debate on the safety of generic substitution quantitatively, the author compared the change in AUC in virtual patients who were simulated for several different scenarios of generic substitution. In four scenarios of original (branded) to generic and generic to generic substitution, 5,000 virtual patients were simulated per scenario using the programming software R. The mean population AUC of generics ranged from 90-110% (scenarios A and B) and 80-123.5% (scenarios C and D) of the AUC of the original. Those patients who had an AUC change (ratio) as a result of drug substitution of less than 0.67 or greater than 1.5 were considered to be in potential danger due to the substitution. We found that less than 6% of patients fell outside of the cutoff range of 0.67-1.5 as a result of original to generic substitution. However, in the case of generic to generic substitution, the proportion was as high as 9-12%. This alerts us to the potential danger of generic substitution, especially for drugs with narrow therapeutic indices.

Equivalence-by-design: targeting in vivo drug delivery profile

In the United States (U.S.), drug products are considered therapeutically equivalent if they meet regulatory criteria of pharmaceutical equivalence and bioequivalence. These requirements can be traced back to 1977 when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published the regulations on bioavailability and bioequivalence. Over the years, to keep up with the advancement in science and technology, the FDA has been constantly updating the regulatory approaches to assessing and ensuring equivalence. In view of the recent growth in novel pharmaceutical dosage forms and delivery systems, this paper examines the current framework for documentation of therapeutic equivalence and explores the opportunities of further advancing equivalence methods for complex drug products. It is proposed that equivalence may be established by matching the in vivo drug delivery profile (iDDP) between drug products in comparison. This can be achieved by characterizing the iDDP of the reference formulation with application of an equivalence-by-design approach for pharmaceutical development. Critical variables can be identified to serve as in vitro markers or biomarkers for mapping the desired drug delivery profile in vivo. A multidisciplinary approach may be necessary to develop these markers for characterization of iDDPs.