Acute changes in plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone concentration and plasma electrolyte concentrations following furosemide administration in patients with congestive heart failure--interrelationships and diuretic response

Right Heart Function in Cardiorenal Syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since CRS is critically dependent on right heart function and involved in interorgan crosstalk, assessment and monitoring of both right heart and kidney function are of utmost importance for clinical outcomes. This systematic review aims to comprehensively report on novel diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms that are gaining importance for the clinical management of the growing heart failure population suffering from CRS.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) in patients with heart failure is associated with poor outcome. Although systemic venous congestion and elevated central venous pressure have been recognized as main contributors to CRS, they are often neglected in clinical practice. The delicate hemodynamic balance in CRS is particularly determined by the respective status of the right heart. The consideration of hemodynamic and CRS profiles is advantageous in tailoring treatment for better preservation of renal function. Assessment and monitoring of right heart and renal function by known and emerging tools like renal Doppler ultrasonography or new biomarkers may have direct clinical implications.

Long-Term Effects of Flosequinan on the Morbidity and Mortality of Patients With Severe Chronic Heart Failure: Primary Results of the PROFILE Trial After 24 Years

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the long-term effects of flosequinan on the morbidity and mortality of patients with severe chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND

Flosequinan was the first oral vasodilator to be used in the clinic to augment the effects of digitalis, diuretics, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure. However, the drug activated neurohormonal systems and exerted both positive inotropic and chronotropic effects, raising concerns about its safety during long-term use.

METHODS

Following a run-in period designed to minimize the risk of tachycardia, we randomly assigned 2,354 patients in New York Heart Association functional class III to IV heart failure and with an ejection fraction ≤35% to receive long-term treatment with placebo or flosequinan (75 or 100 mg/day) in addition to their usual therapy. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The trial was terminated after a recommendation of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board, because during an average of 10 months of follow-up, 192 patients died in the placebo group and 255 patients died in the flosequinan group (hazard ratio: 1.39, 95% confidence interval: 1.15 to 1.67; p = 0.0006). Flosequinan also increased the risk of disease progression, which was paralleled by drug-related increases in heart rate and neurohormonal activation. However, during the first month, patients in the flosequinan group were more likely to report an improvement in well-being and less likely to experience worsening heart failure. Similarly, during the month following drug withdrawal at the end of the trial, patients withdrawn from flosequinan were more likely than those withdrawn from placebo to report symptoms of or to require treatment for worsening heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Although flosequinan produced meaningful symptomatic benefits during short- and long-term treatment, the drug increased the risk of death in patients with severe chronic heart failure.

An exploratory analysis of the competing effects of aggressive decongestion and high-dose loop diuretic therapy in the DOSE trial

BACKGROUND

Effective decongestion of heart failure patients predicts improved outcomes, but high dose loop diuretics (HDLD) used to achieve diuresis predict adverse outcomes. In the DOSE trial, randomization to a HDLD intensification strategy (HDLD-strategy) improved diuresis but not outcomes. Our objective was to determine if potential beneficial effects of more aggressive decongestion may have been offset by adverse effects of the HDLD used to achieve diuresis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A post hoc analysis of the DOSE trial (n=308) was conducted to determine the influence of post-randomization diuretic dose and fluid output on the rate of death, rehospitalization or emergency department visitation associated with the HDLD-strategy. Net fluid output was used as a surrogate for beneficial decongestive effects and cumulative loop diuretic dose for the dose-related adverse effects of the HDLD-strategy. Randomization to the HDLD-strategy resulted in increased fluid output, even after adjusting for cumulative diuretic dose (p=0.006). Unadjusted, the HDLD-strategy did not improve outcomes (p=0.28). However, following adjustment for cumulative diuretic dose, significant benefit emerged (HR=0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.95, p=0.028). Adjusting for net fluid balance eliminated the benefit (HR=0.95, 95% CI 0.67-1.4, p=0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

A clinically meaningful benefit from a randomized aggressive decongestion strategy became apparent after accounting for the quantity of loop diuretic administered. Adjusting for the diuresis resulting from this strategy eliminated the benefit. These hypothesis-generating observations may suggest a role for aggressive decongestion in improved outcomes.

Novel renal biomarkers to assess cardiorenal syndrome

Renal dysfunction (RD) in heart failure portends adverse outcomes and often limits aggressive medical and decongestive therapies. Despite the high prevalence in this population, not all forms of RD are prognostically or mechanistically equivalent: RD can result from irreversible nephron loss secondary to diabetic or hypertensive kidney disease or it can develop secondary to heart failure (HF) itself, i.e., the cardiorenal syndrome. Furthermore, filtration is only one aspect of renal performance such that significant renal impairment secondary to cardiorenal syndrome can exist despite a normal glomerular filtration rate. Renal biomarkers have the potential to inform some of the intricacies involved in accurately assessing cardiorenal interactions. This article discusses novel biomarkers for cardiorenal syndrome and their utility in the prognosis, diagnosis, and targeted treatment of heart failure-induced RD.

Interaction between loop diuretic-associated mortality and blood urea nitrogen concentration in chronic heart failure

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a surrogate for renal neurohormonal activation, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), could identify patients destined to experience adverse outcomes associated with the use of high-dose loop diuretics (HDLD).

BACKGROUND

Loop diuretics are commonly used to control congestive symptoms in heart failure; however, these agents cause neurohormonal activation and have been associated with worsened survival.

METHODS

Subjects in the BEST (Beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial) receiving loop diuretics at baseline were analyzed (N = 2,456). The primary outcome was the interaction between BUN- and HDLD-associated mortality.

RESULTS

In the overall cohort, HDLD use (≥160 mg/day) was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35 to 1.80). However, after extensively controlling for baseline characteristics, this association did not persist (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.25). In subjects with BUN levels above the median (21.0 mg/dl), both the unadjusted (HR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.34 to 1.88) and adjusted (HR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.60) risk of death was higher in the HDLD group. In patients with BUN levels below the median, there was no associated risk with HDLD (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.34) and after controlling for baseline characteristics, the HDLD group had significantly improved survival (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.96) (p interaction = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk associated with HDLD use is strongly dependent on BUN concentrations with reduced survival in patients with an elevated BUN level and improved survival in patients with a normal BUN level. These data suggest a role for neurohormonal activation in loop diuretic-associated mortality.

Natriuretic peptides and panic disorder: therapeutic prospects

Natriuretic peptides differentially modulate endocrine and behavioral stress responses in preclinical and human studies. While atrial natriuretic peptide inhibits the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis, C-type natriuretic peptide exerts stimulatory activity. In rodents, atrial natriuretic peptide reduces anxiety, whereas C-type natriuretic peptide has anxiogenic effects (mediated via corticotropin-releasing hormone). Patients with panic disorder show lower basal ANP plasma levels but a more pronounced release during experimentally induced panic attacks compared with controls. This could explain the absent pituitary-adrenocortical activation during panic anxiety and its paroxysmal nature. Furthermore, the effects of the panicogen cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide are attenuated by ANP pretreatment in panic patients, while C-type natriuretic peptide demonstrates anxiogenic action in healthy humans. Atrial natriuretic peptide agonists and C-type natriuretic peptide antagonists may have potential as a new class of antipanic and anxiolytic psychotherapeutic medication.

Implications of altered limbic-hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (LHPA)-function for neurobiology of depression

The current article suggests that the neuroendocrine system constitutes a bidirectional link between the brain and humoral homeostasis in the periphery. Any change of neuronal activity in the brain--regardless whether induced by external stimuli or endogenous errors of metabolism--may result in altered composition of gene products. Among these are peptides which directly or indirectly alter endocrine activity and may concomitantly induce a variety of behavioral effects. This has been experimentally demonstrated by neuropeptidergic manipulation of sleep-electroencephalographic (EEG) measures and behavioral studies in animals. An integral part of the neuroendocrine communication are effects of peripheral hormones upon brain structures and their interactions with the immune system. Within this framework all hormones of the limbic-hypothalamic- pituitary-adrenocortical (LHPA)-axis play a dominant role, because: (1) corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) was shown to integrate centrally behavioral and metabolic responses to stress; and (2) corticosteroids exert a host of neurochemical changes within the CNS which by far exceed their primary endocrine feedback action. As a corollary, hyperexposure to corticosteroids induces widespread changes of neuronal cell biology which are of clinical significance for depression research (e.g. neuronal cell loss in the hippocampus, down-regulation of glucocorticoid receptors within monoaminergic neurons). Clinical neuroendocrine research over the past years focussed upon evaluation of pathophysiology underlying dexamethasone resistant cortisol levels or hypercortisolism linked to depression and utilized advanced methods for multihormonal analysis and newly synthesized neuropeptides (e.g. CRH) for challenge studies in combination with neurophysiological assessments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)