[Clinical counseling and care of women with genetic predisposition to breast and ovarian carcinoma]

Age of uptake of early cancer detection facilities by low-risk and high-risk patients with familial breast and ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Some 5-10% of all cases of breast cancer and ovarian cancer have a hereditary genesis. In the setting of an interdisciplinary cancer genetics clinic, a study of the age at which patients first take advantage of early cancer detection (ECD) facilities was conducted in order to assess the influence of familial risk on health issues.

METHODS

The study included 556 women who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (IC) for genetic analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, as well as 205 who did not meet these criteria but attended the primary consultation.

RESULTS

Consulters who met the inclusion criteria took advantage of nearly all methods of ECD at an earlier time than women who did not. A comparison of consulters with or without breast cancer showed that those without breast cancer participated in all methods of ECD at an earlier time.

CONCLUSION

Methods of improving and increasing participation in ECD facilities, and of encouraging women who are at risk to start on such programs at a younger age, need to be discussed. In this study, familial risk already resulted in a younger age of uptake of ECD facilities.

Use of intensified early cancer detection in high-risk patients with familial breast and ovarian cancer

A prospective follow-up study was carried out to evaluate the influence of risk and genetic counselling on use of early cancer detection. Five hundred and fifty-six subjects who fulfilled inclusion criteria for a genetic analysis of the BRCA1/2 genes (the high-risk group A) and 205 who did not fulfil the inclusion criteria (the lower risk group B) attended primary consultation in the interdisciplinary cancer genetic clinic. Information about participation in the early cancer detection programme was documented. Information about changes in use after consultation could be evaluated from 349 women (94 group B and 255 group A). Methods such as monthly self-palpation, breast palpation by gynaecologist, ultrasound of the breast, transvaginal ultrasound and pelvic examination had all been commonly used. Consultees at higher risk used mammography less often than women at lower risk. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast was used rarely. Most methods were used more often at the recommended interval by women at higher risk during the follow-up period. In conclusion, at present intensified early cancer detection programmes for women at risk provide a less invasive option than chemoprevention or prophylactic surgery. Although the methods are used at high frequency it seems feasible to motivate women at risk to participate. This can be done by providing information and counselling in the cancer genetic clinic.