Change in hearing and tinnitus in conservatively managed vestibular schwannomas

Vestibular schwannoma coexisting with dermoid cyst: A case report

Multiple primary intracranial tumors, or the presence of two or more primary intracranial tumors, are a rare clinical occurrence. The current study presents the case of a 28-year-old patient with concurrent left vestibular schwannoma, left cerebellar hemisphere dermoid cyst and craniovertebral junction malformation, specifically basilar invagination and Klippel-Feil syndrome. The patient exhibited symptoms of torticollis and recurrent headaches, with no apparent hearing loss. A far lateral approach was selected for surgical resection to address these complex conditions and achieve gross total resection in a single-stage surgery while preserving both facial and auditory nerve function. Successful gross total resection was achieved and the function of both nerves was effectively preserved. Of note, the coexistence of vestibular schwannoma and dermoid cyst in the same patient has not been documented in the existing literature. The present study provided a comprehensive account of the presentation and progression of this uncommon medical scenario. Furthermore, a surgical principle for the management of multiple primary intracranial tumors was proposed.

Hearing Preservation in Observed Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the natural history of hearing loss for patients presenting with serviceable hearing (SH) who undergo a wait-and-scan approach for sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) using aggregate time-to-event survival analysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING

Published international English literature, January 1, 2000 to May 31, 2020.

PATIENTS

Patients with sporadic VS entering a wait-and-scan approach with SH at diagnosis.

INTERVENTIONS

Observation with serial MRI and audiometry.

RESULTS

In total, 3,652 patients from 26 studies were included for analysis. Mean age at diagnosis was 58.8 years (SD, 4.1). Mean follow-up was 49.2 months (SD, 26.5). In total, 755 patients (21%) failed conservative treatment and underwent radiosurgery or microsurgery at the time of last follow-up. The average loss to follow-up was 6.9% (SD, 11.1). A total of 1,674 patients had SH at the time of diagnosis. Survival rates for maintaining SH were 96% at 1 year, 77% at 3 years, 62% at 5 years, and 42% at 10 years following diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

In this systematic review, aggregate data from 3,652 patients across 26 studies show consistent patterns in progression of hearing loss during observation for patients with sporadic VS as a function of time. As an easy-toremember conservative benchmark for those presenting with SH at diagnosis: approximately 75% retain SH at 3 years, 60% at 5 years, and 40% at 10 years.

Comparing Hearing Outcomes in Irradiated and Conservatively Managed Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

Compare hearing outcome for vestibular schwannoma patients following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or conservative management.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

University Hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients with small- or medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannoma (intracanalicular or with CPA component <2 cm) who were managed conservatively or underwent SRS with available clinical, radiological, and audiometric data from the time of presentation (or just before radiotherapy for the SRS group) and most recent follow-up; with the two sets of data to be compared being at least 3 years apart (minimum follow-up period).

INTERVENTIONS

SRS or observation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Pure-tone averages, speech discrimination scores, and corresponding hearing classifications.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-seven patients met our inclusion criteria; 140 were managed conservatively with a mean follow-up period of 5.9 ± 1.6 years and 107 underwent SRS with a mean follow-up period of 7.1 ± 1.9 years. There was significant deterioration of hearing measures for both groups; with the SRS group displaying consistently worse measures. SRS patients showed worse mean pure-tone averages and speech discrimination scores decline rates by 2.72 dB/yr and 2.98 %/yr, respectively, when compared with conservatively managed patients. Stratifying patients according to Tokyo's hearing classification revealed that 68.75% of conservatively managed patients who had baseline serviceable hearing preserved their hearing throughout the studied period compared with only 15.38% of the SRS patients.

CONCLUSION

Based on our data we conclude that patients with small- and medium-sized tumors will have a better hearing outcome if managed via an initial conservative approach with radiotherapy reserved for those demonstrating disease progression.

Hearing and Quality of Life Over Time in Vestibular Schwannoma Patients: Observation Compared to Stereotactic Radiosurgery

OBJECTIVE

To examine quality of life changes for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) undergoing observation or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Patients with VS who underwent observation or SRS and had at least two audiograms and Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) surveys, a quality of life survey for patients with VS.

INTERVENTIONS

SRS or observation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pure-tone average (PTA), speech discrimination score (SDS), PANQOL score; controlling for tumor size, baseline hearing, and other factors.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-three patients met inclusion criteria: 89 underwent observation and 34 SRS. There was no significant difference in the rate of decline measured by PTA (PTA worsened at a rate of 0.25 dB/yr more in the observation group compared with the SRS group, p = 0.77) and SDS (SDS worsened at a rate of 2.1%/yr more in the SRS group compared with the observation group, p = 0.82). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated the SRS group had a higher probability to progress to class D hearing over observation (hazard ratio 7.1, p = 0.005). The rate of change of the SRS PANQOL scores was significantly improved in the total (p = 0.005) and hearing (p = 0.04) domain score compared with observation. However, both groups regress to a similar PANQOL total and hearing domain score over time.

CONCLUSION

PANQOL scores were higher at baseline in the observation group than in the SRS group. However, over time, PANQOL scores in the observation group decreased while PANQOL scores in the SRS group increased, resulting in PANQOL scores that were equivalent by the end of follow-up.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on Hearing Preservation Outcomes in Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas

Question 1

What is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following stereotactic radiosurgery utilizing modern dose planning, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled that there is moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 2

Among patients with AAO-HNS (American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery hearing classification) class A or GR (Gardner-Robertson hearing classification) grade I hearing at baseline, what is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following stereotactic radiosurgery, utilizing modern dose planning, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled that there is a high probability (>75%-100%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 3

What patient- and tumor-related factors influence progression to nonserviceable hearing following stereotactic radiosurgery using ≤13 Gy to the tumor margin?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled regarding the probability of successful hearing preservation based on the following prognostic data: the most consistent prognostic features associated with maintenance of serviceable hearing are good preoperative word recognition and/or pure tone thresholds with variable cut-points reported, smaller tumor size, marginal tumor dose ≤12 Gy, and cochlear dose ≤4 Gy. Age and sex are not strong predictors of hearing preservation outcome.

Question 4

What is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following microsurgical resection of small to medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannomas early after surgery, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering microsurgical resection should be counseled that there is a moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation immediately following surgery, moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 5

Among patients with AAO-HNS class A or GR grade I hearing at baseline, what is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following microsurgical resection of small to medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannomas early after surgery, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering microsurgical resection should be counseled that there is a moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation immediately following surgery, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 6

What patient- and tumor-related factors influence progression to nonserviceable hearing following microsurgical resection of small to medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannomas?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering microsurgical resection should be counseled regarding the probability of successful hearing preservation based on the following prognostic data: the most consistent prognostic features associated with maintenance of serviceable hearing are good preoperative word recognition and/or pure tone thresholds with variable cut-points reported, smaller tumor size commonly less than 1 cm, and presence of a distal internal auditory canal cerebrospinal fluid fundal cap. Age and sex are not strong predictors of hearing preservation outcome.

Question 7

What is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing with conservative observation of vestibular schwannomas at 2, 5, and 10 yr following diagnosis?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering observation should be counseled that there is a high probability (>75%-100%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr.

Question 8

Among patients with AAO-HNS class A or GR grade I hearing at baseline, what is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing with conservative observation at 2 and 5 yr following diagnosis?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled that there is a high probability (>75%-100%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, and moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr. Insufficient data were available to determine the probability of hearing preservation at 10 yr for this population subset.

Question 9

What patient and tumor-related factors influence progression to nonserviceable hearing during conservative observation?

Recommendation

Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering observation should be counseled regarding probability of successful hearing preservation based on the following prognostic data: the most consistent prognostic features associated with maintenance of serviceable hearing are good preoperative word recognition and/or pure tone thresholds with variable cut-points reported, as well as nongrowth of the tumor. Tumor size at the time of diagnosis, age, and sex do not predict future development of nonserviceable hearing during observation.  The full guideline can be found at: https://www.cns.org/guidelines/guidelines-manage-ment-patients-vestibular-schwannoma/chapter_3.

Surgery of the lateral skull base: a 50-year endeavour

Disregarding the widely used division of skull base into anterior and lateral, since the skull base should be conceived as a single anatomic structure, it was to our convenience to group all those approaches that run from the antero-lateral, pure lateral and postero-lateral side of the skull base as “Surgery of the lateral skull base”. “50 years of endeavour” points to the great effort which has been made over the last decades, when more and more difficult surgeries were performed by reducing morbidity. The principle of lateral skull base surgery, “remove skull base bone to approach the base itself and the adjacent sites of the endo-esocranium”, was then combined with function preservation and with tailoring surgery to the pathology. The concept that histology dictates the extent of resection, balancing the intrinsic morbidity of each approach was the object of the first section of the present report. The main surgical approaches were described in the second section and were conceived not as a step-by-step description of technique, but as the highlighthening of the surgical principles. The third section was centered on open issues related to the tumor and its treatment. The topic of vestibular schwannoma was investigated with the current debate on observation, hearing preservation surgery, hearing rehabilitation, radiotherapy and the recent efforts to detect biological markers able to predict tumor growth. Jugular foramen paragangliomas were treated in the frame of radical or partial surgery, radiotherapy, partial “tailored” surgery and observation. Surgery on meningioma was debated from the point of view of the neurosurgeon and of the otologist. Endolymphatic sac tumors and malignant tumors of the external auditory canal were also treated, as well as chordomas, chondrosarcomas and petrous bone cholesteatomas. Finally, the fourth section focused on free-choice topics which were assigned to aknowledged experts. The aim of this work was attempting to report the state of the art of the lateral skull base surgery after 50 years of hard work and, above all, to raise questions on those issues which still need an answer, as to allow progress in knowledge through sharing of various experiences. At the end of the reading, if more doubts remain rather than certainties, the aim of this work will probably be achieved.

Systematic Review of Hearing Preservation in Observed Vestibular Schwannoma

Objective  This is a systematic review of the literature on the spontaneous course of hearing in patients observed with a vestibular schwannoma. Included studies are appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Design  PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane library, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) were searched for literature on hearing in patients observed with a vestibular schwannoma. Participants  Of 217 evaluated papers, 15 were included, representing a total of 2,142 patients. Main Outcome Measures  Hearing according to the AAO-HNS (American Academy of Otorhinolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery) classification system. Weighted average of the proportion of patients preserving good hearing (>70% discrimination score and pure tone audiometry [PTA] < 30dB) and serviceable hearing (>50% discrimination score and PTA < 50dB) was determined. Results  Fifty percent of patients presenting with good hearing at diagnosis had preserved this after a mean of 5 years of observation, whereas serviceable hearing was preserved in 54%. Patients with normal discrimination at diagnosis preserve their hearing very well. Very few studies exist on long-term hearing preservation. Conclusions  After 5 years of observation, around half of patients will have preserved good or serviceable hearing. Patients with normal discrimination at diagnosis are more likely to preserve good hearing.

Ten-Year Follow-up on Tumor Growth and Hearing in Patients Observed With an Intracanalicular Vestibular Schwannoma

BACKGROUND

Reports on the natural history of tumor growth and hearing in patients with a vestibular schwannoma (VS) are almost exclusively short-term data. Long-term data are needed for comparison with results of surgery and radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

To report the long-term occurrence of tumor growth and hearing loss in 156 patients diagnosed with an intracanalicular VS and managed conservatively.

METHODS

In this longitudinal cohort study, diagnostic and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging and audiometry were compared.

RESULTS

After a follow-up of 9.5 years, tumor growth had occurred in 37% and growth into the cerebellopontine angle had occurred in 23% of patients. Conservative treatment failed in 15%. The pure tone average had increased from 51- to 72-dB hearing level, and the speech discrimination score (SDS) had decreased from 60% to 34%. The number of patients with good hearing (SDS > 70%) was reduced from 52% to 22%, and the number of patients with American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) class A hearing was reduced from 19% to 3%. Hearing was preserved better in patients with 100% SDS at diagnosis than in patients with even a small loss of SDS. Serviceable hearing was preserved in 34% according to AAO-HNS (class A-B) and in 58% according to the word recognition score (class I-II). Rate of hearing loss was higher in patients with growing tumors.

CONCLUSION

Tumor growth occurred in only a minority of patients diagnosed with an intracanalicular VS during 10 years of observation. The risk of hearing loss is small in patients with normal discrimination at diagnosis. Serviceable hearing is preserved spontaneously in 34% according to AAO-HNS and in 58% according to the word recognition score.