Anatomo-radiological evaluation of lateral approaches to the skull base

Less is more: Parahippocampal resection or endoscopic assistance in ambient cistern surgery? Qualitative and quantitative assessment of subtemporal approach

The ambient cistern is an arachnoid complex that extends from the crural cistern to lateral border of cerebral colliculi. The subtemporal approach has been recognized as the best access to reach pathologies in the ambient cistern, however many disadvantages exist. The present work aims to analyze quantitatively the area of exposure provided by the subtemporal access. The objective is to evaluate if there are advantages of using the neuroendoscope in conventional subtemporal access when compared to the subtemporal access with resection of the parahippocampal gyrus. A subtemporal approach was performed in six brain hemispheres. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were made. The linear exposition of the vascular structures and the surgical exposure area were evaluated. The linear exposure to the posterior cerebral artery was 5.95 for subtemporal access (ST) and 13.6 for subtemporal access with resection of the parahippocampal gyrus (STh) (p = 0.019). The total exposure area was 104.8 mm² for ST and 210.5 for STh (p = 0.0001). Regarding endoscope assistance the medial area, ST was 81.0 mm², and STend was 176.2 mm² (p = 0.038). For the total area of exposure, we obtained a value of 210.5 mm² for ST and a value of 391.3 mm² for STend (p = 0.041). In conventional subtemporal access, the use of the neuroendoscopes avoids the need for resection of the parahippocampal gyrus for better visualization of the ambient cistern structures.

A new methodology for laboratory evaluation of neurosurgical approaches based on the volume and shape of the surgical space with a mathematical model to quantify the surgical maneuverability in laboratory settings

We conducted this study to validate the volume/shape of the surgical exposure and to introduce a mathematical model to quantify the maneuverability in a surgical space. We executed the pterional and lateral supraorbital approach four times in fresh cadavers in skull base laboratory. The surgical volumes were filled with a computed tomography (CT)-imageable mixture; CT scans were obtained to evaluate the volume and shape of the surgical space. The volume of the surgical space was 23.60 and 32.90 mL for the lateral supraorbital and pterional approach, respectively, (p < 0.05). The three-dimensional shape of the lateral supraorbital approach was cylindrical and that of the pterional approach pyramidal. The volume of the surgical approach can be used to define, together with other variables, the maneuverability (maneuvering in a surgical volume) by using the following formula [Formula: see text] where M, A, V, and L represent the maneuverability, the degree of the surgical freedom, the volume of the surgical exposure, and the surgical depth, respectively. Volume and shape of the surgical exposure are two objective parameters that can be used to define and contrast different microsurgical approaches in a laboratory setting. The volume of the surgical exposure may be integrated into a mathematical formula defining maneuverability.

Anatomical study of the superior orbital fissure as seen during a pterional approach

Object

The superior orbital fissure (SOF) is an important landmark in the neurosurgical pterional approach, but the anatomical features of the SOF and the procedures necessary to fully expose it and its contents have not been detailed. Although the pterional approach is commonly used during skull base or vascular surgery by neurosurgeons who may already be familiar with its nuances and anatomical relationships to the SOF, this knowledge may also be useful to the wider neurosurgical community. The authors describe the spatial relationships of the contents of the SOF and suggest a specific sequence of steps for exposing the SOF region in a pterional approach.

Methods

Using standard microsurgical equipment and instruments, the authors performed 20 pterional approaches in 10 embalmed cadaver heads in which the vascular systems had been injected with colored material.

Five sequential steps were delineated for approaching and dissecting the SOF and its contents: 1) drilling the sphenoidal ridge, anterior clinoidal process, and part of the greater and lesser wings of the sphenoid; 2) resecting the dural bridge; 3) detaching the hemispheric dura mater, thereby exposing the anterior portion of the cavernous sinus and the neural component entering the SOF; 4) identifying and dissecting the extraanular structures; and 5) opening the anulus of Zinn and identifying its neural constituents.

Conclusions

Knowing the 3D relationships of the contents of the SOF encountered in the pterional approach enables safe neurosurgical access to the area. The proposed sequence of steps allows a controlled exposure of the SOF and surrounding areas. Untethering the frontotemporal lobe by transecting the dural bridge connecting the dura to the perior-bita allows good exposure of the basal frontotemporal lobes, both intra- and extradurally, and reduces brain retraction.