Immunoregulation of malignant lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas in children. II. Treatment

The prognosis of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in childhood has improved steadily in the last 2 decades. This is primarily the result of increasingly effective chemotherapy regimens tailored to defined and relatively homogeneous prognostic categories and tested in prospective clinical trials. Surgical excision remains of prognostic benefit only when near-total resection can be performed without delay of chemotherapy. The role of radiation therapy is now limited to the treatment of overt central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma, disease unresponsive to chemotherapy, and certain emergencies. Effective 'prophylactic' treatment of the CNS has been achieved in most series by intrathecal and systemic chemotherapy alone. The most relevant modality of treatment is chemotherapy and a very large number of protocols have been published. The origins of current multi-agent regimens stem both from early experience with cyclophosphamide in endemic Burkitt's lymphoma and from therapeutic studies of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Sub-stratification of non-localized NHL has produced protocols designed for either lymphoblastic (mostly T cell) or non-lymphoblastic (mostly B cell) categories. While the cure rate for lymphoblastic lymphoma now exceed 70%, the non-localized non-lymphoblastic disease remains a major obstacle to cure. These patients frequently present with large abdominal primaries and are prone to regional as well as hematogenous dissemination. In particular, involvement of the CNS is now considered to be the most adverse prognostic variable in this group. Recently, highly intensive regimens are addressing these obstacles. On the other hand, NHL defined as localized has been shown to be curable in up to 95% of children with the use of simple chemotherapy regimens as short as 6 months in duration. Salvage of patients who relapse during or after chemotherapy remains bleak but cures are possible with regimens incorporating bone marrow transplantation from either an autologous or allogeneic source. Experimental methods, including biologic and immune response modifiers may also offer future promise.

Biological response modifiers: preclinical evaluation and clinical activity

Biological response modifiers are agents capable of affecting the host immune response toward tumors and include those biological substances produced by the human mammalian cell genome. Interferons and other lymphokines, tumor antigens, antibodies and agents which can activate or stimulate host immune responses are all included in this general category of agents. With the advent of genetic engineering and with monoclonal antibody technology, highly pure preparations of these biological substances can now be produced for tests of activity in preclinical models and in man. As the initial results accrue with highly purified preparations of interferon and with monoclonal antibodies alone or conjugated to toxic substances, the possibility of tumor specific therapy is becoming a reality. The development of preclinical models to predict for clinical activity remains a most important task to attempt to bring to clinical trials the substances most likely to be efficacious as anticancer agents. Early clinical results indicate that many of these agents can give responses in patients with clinically perceptible disease and Phase II activity studies are just beginning to define the range of clinical activity for a variety of biological response modifying agents. The development of biological response modifiers through preclinical testing and into clinical trials will be discussed in detail.