Effect of omeprazole and cimetidine on duodenal ulcer. A double-blind comparative trial

Quality indicators in gastroscopy. Gastroscopy procedure

Within the project "Quality indicators in digestive endoscopy", pioneered by the Spanish Society for Digestive Diseases (SEPD), the objective of this research is to suggest the structure, process, and results procedures and indicators necessary to implement and assess quality in the gastroscopy setting. First, a chart was designed with the steps to be followed during a gastroscopy procedure. Secondly, a team of experts in care quality and/or endoscopy performed a qualitative review of the literature searching for quality indicators for endoscopic procedures, including gastroscopies. Finally, using a paired analysis approach, a selection of the literature obtained was undertaken. For gastroscopy, a total of nine process indicators were identified (one preprocedure, eight intraprocedure). Evidence quality was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) classification scale.

A High Comorbidity Score Should Not be a Contraindication for Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Currently, potential kidney transplant patients more often suffer from comorbidities. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was developed in 1987 and is the most used comorbidity score. We questioned to what extent number and severity of comorbidities interfere with graft and patient survival. Besides, we wondered whether the CCI was best to study the influence of comorbidity in kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

In our center, 1728 transplants were performed between 2000 and 2013. There were 0.8% cases with missing values. Nine pretransplant comorbidity covariates were defined: cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular accident, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, liver disease, lung disease, malignancy, other organ transplantation, and human immunodeficiency virus positivity. The CCI used was unadjusted for recipient age. The Rotterdam Comorbidity in Kidney Transplantation score was developed, and its influence was compared to the CCI. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, corrected for variables with a known significant influence, were performed.

RESULTS

We noted 325 graft failures and 215 deaths. The only comorbidity covariate that significantly influenced graft failure censored for death was peripheral vascular disease. Patient death was significantly influenced by cardiovascular disease, other organ transplantation, and the total comorbidity scores. Model fit was best with the Rotterdam Comorbidity in Kidney Transplantation score compared to separate comorbidity covariates and the CCI. In the population with the highest comorbidity score, 50% survived more than 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the negative influence of comorbidity, patient survival after transplantation is remarkably good. This means that even patients with extensive comorbidity should be considered for transplantation.

Observational comparative trial of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors versus histamine-2 receptor antagonists for uninvestigated dyspepsia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

It is still controversial which drugs, proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RA), are more effective for dyspepsia in the Japanese population.

METHODS

Patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia (n = 104; male/female 41/63) were treated with either rabeprazole 10 mg o.d. (n = 62) or lafutidine 10 mg b.i.d. (n = 42) for 4 weeks. Questionnaires (modified Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease [mFSSG] and quality of life [QOL], SF-8) were administered before and after therapy. The mFSSG was classified into a total score (Q-T), reflux score (Q-R), dyspepsia score (Q-D) and pain score (Q-P). The SF-8 had a physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). The predominant type of symptom was reflux (R-S), pain (P-S) or dysmotility (D-S).

RESULTS

R-S was 19.2%, P-S 48.1%, D-S 24.0% and overlap 8.7%. In the R-S, Q-T and Q-R significantly improved with rabeprazole, but neither scale improved with lafutidine. MCS significantly improved with rabeprazole. In P-S, Q-T, Q-R, Q-D and Q-P significantly improved with both drugs. PCS significantly improved with both, whereas the MCS significant improved with rabeprazole. In D-S, Q-R and Q-D significant improved with rabeprazole, but neither improved with lafutidine. QOL did not improve with either. With overlap, neither scale nor the QOL reached a significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Both PPI and H2RA have a positive effect on P-S, but H(2)RA therapy is limited for R-S and D-S, whereas PPI therapy is generally effective. Therefore, careful prescription based on symptoms is important.

Rebamipide may be comparable to H2 receptor antagonist in healing iatrogenic gastric ulcers created by endoscopic mucosal resection: a prospective randomized pilot study

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) results in the formation of iatrogenic gastric ulcers and the optimal treatments for such ulcers are still unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rebamipide in the management of EMR-induced ulcers by comparing it with an H(2) receptor antagonist. After EMR, patients were randomly assigned into either rebamipide or famotidine groups. All patients received a one-week lansoprazole 30 mg q.d. therapy followed by three-week famotidine (20 mg b.i.d.) or rebamipide (100 mg t.i.d.) therapy. Four weeks after the treatments, ulcer sizes, stages, bleeding rates, and ulcer-related symptoms were compared using endoscopy and a questionnaire. A total of 63 patients were enrolled in this study. Finally, 51 patients were analyzed, 26 in rebamipide and 25 in famotidine group. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. Four weeks after EMR, the two groups were comparable in terms of ulcer reduction ratio (P=0.297), and ulcer stage (P=1.000). Moreover, no difference was observed with regard to ulcer-related symptoms, drug compliance, adverse drug event rates, and bleeding rates. Our data suggest that rebamipide is not inferior to famotidine in healing iatrogenic gastric ulcers, and could be a therapeutic option in the treatment of such ulcers.

A prospective randomized trial of lafutidine vs rabeprazole on post-ESD gastric ulcers

AIM: To compare the effects of rabeprazole and lafutidine on post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) gastric ulcers.

METHODS: Patients with gastric tumors indicated for ESD were prospectively studied. After ESD, all patients were treated with intravenous omeprazole for the first 3 d. Patients were then randomly assigned to oral lafutidine or rabeprazole. Ulcer size, ulcer size reduction rate, and ulcer stage were evaluated 4 wk later. Occurrence of complication was monitored throughout the 4-wk period.

RESULTS: Sixty five patients were enrolled in the study, and 60 patients were subjected to the final analysis. In the lafutidine group (30 lesions in 29 patients), initial and 4-wk post-ESD ulcer sizes were 33.3 ± 9.2 and 10.5 ± 4.8 mm, respectively. In the rabeprazole group (34 lesions in 31 patients), the values were 34.7 ± 11.3 and 11.8 ± 6.7 mm, respectively. Ulcer size reduction rates in lafutidine and rabeprazole groups were 32.3% and 33.5%, respectively (P = 0.974). Ulcer stage 4 wk post-ESD did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.868). Two cases in the rabeprazole group and no cases in the lafutidine group developed ulcer bleeding during the oral dose period, although the difference of bleeding rate between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.157).

CONCLUSION: Lafutidine and rabeprazole have equivalent therapeutic effects on post-ESD gastric ulcers.

What is an intractable duodenal ulcer and how should it be managed?

An intractable duodenal ulcer is an ulcer that has not healed after 8 weeks of full-dose treatment with a modern anti-ulcer drug. Such ulcers are relatively rare--perhaps five in 100 patients will have intractable duodenal ulceration. The differential diagnosis includes non-compliance as a cause of continuing ulceration, hypersecretion of gastric acid or other rare causes of ulcers in the duodenum. Investigations should include biopsy of the continuing ulceration at endoscopy, measurement of fasting plasma gastrin and routine haematology and biochemistry profiles. An intractable duodenal ulcer can be treated either by using a powerful antisecretory regimen (high doses of ranitidine or famotidine or a conventional dose of omeprazole), by changing to tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate or, in exceptional circumstances, by extremely careful surgical intervention.

Future prospects for proton pump inhibitors

Future prospects for proton pump inhibitors depend on their efficacy and safety relative to H2-receptor antagonists, the therapeutic standard for acid peptic disorders. As safety concerns diminish, efficacy considerations become more important as these may pertain to cost effectiveness. Comparative, controlled trials show that omeprazole and lansoprazole are somewhat more effective than H2-blockers in healing duodenal and gastric ulcers, providing faster relief of symptoms. Relapse after cessation of therapy is similar between the two classes. The proton pump inhibitors are substantially more effective in healing lesions and relieving symptoms in patients with reflux oesophagitis, and are particularly effective in cases that have failed to heal after 12 weeks of treatment with H2-blockers. Relapse rates of oesophagitis are significantly less with prolonged treatment with omeprazole than ranitidine. A proton pump inhibitor combined with amoxicillin is less effective than triple therapy with antibiotics and bismuth in eradicating Helicobacter pylori infections, but is more convenient and associated with fewer side-effects. Efficacy might be improved by more optimal dosing regimens. Prospects for reversible proton pump inhibitors depend on the balance between their theoretical advantages and their acid inhibition profile which, at present, closely resembles that of H2-blockers.

What are the current possibilities in treating peptic ulcer disease?

There are two major principles of ulcer therapy. Today, the most widely accepted drugs are those which substantially reduce aggressive factors (i.c. acid and pepsin), namely histamine H2-receptor antagonists, antimuscarinics and antacids. Less frequently applied are mucoprotective agents like colloidal bismuth compounds and sucralfate. Prostaglandins both reduce acid secretion substantially and are believed to enhance mucosal resistance. Their anti-ulcer efficacy, however, is solely explicable by their antisecretory activity. Although mucosa-strengthening agents and H2-receptor blockers have nearly identical healing rates, mucosa-strengthening agents have inconvenient dosage regimens (four times or twice daily) and are probably less effective in relieving pain. The same holds true for antacids. Prostaglandins, antimuscarinics and antacids have dose related side effects. In contrast, H2-receptor blockers are characterized by a clear mechanism of action, convenient dosage regimens, good tolerance and a low incidence of side-effects. H2-receptor antagonists are the most effective anti-ulcer drugs presently available.

Omeprazole may be superior to famotidine in the management of iatrogenic ulcer after endoscopic mucosal resection: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Acid suppressing agents are widely used to treat the iatrogenic ulcers following endoscopic mucosal resection for gastric neoplasms. However, the relative merits of proton pump inhibitor or histamine(2)-receptor antagonist for endoscopic mucosal resection-induced ulcers are not known.

AIM

To prospectively compare omeprazole and famotidine for the healing of endoscopic mucosal resection-induced ulcers and for bleeding control.

METHODS

After endoscopic mucosal resection, patients were randomly assigned to omeprazole (20 mg/day) or to famotidine (40 mg/day) group for a 28-day treatment period. The ulcer sizes and stages, bleeding rates and ulcer-related symptoms were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were randomized equally to each group. Forty-one patients in each group were finally compared. The two groups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics. Twenty-eight days after treatment, the two groups were not different with respect to ulcer stage (P = 0.137) or ulcer reduction ratio (P = 0.380). No difference was observed with respect to ulcer-related symptoms (P = 0.437) and no bleeding episode occurred in any of the 82 patients. In subgroup that underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection, fewer patients in the omeprazole group showed active ulcers than those in the famotidine group (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that omeprazole may be superior to famotidine for iatrogenic ulcers following endoscopic mucosal resection, especially for large ulcers.

Review article: exploration of the genetic aetiology of inflammatory bowel disease--implications for diagnosis and therapy

Genomic technologies offer new approaches to the investigation of the aetiology and pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease. An important field relevant to inflammatory bowel disease therapy is the pharmacogenetic investigation of gene variations that may predict responses to certain medications in order to target these therapeutic interventions more precisely. To date, only about 12,000 of the estimated 30,000-50,000 human genes have been characterized. Therefore, the use of techniques for a global analysis of gene expression may allow the identification of new pathways or molecules in the therapeutic mechanisms of drugs. Recently, NOD2 has been identified as the first disease gene in inflammatory bowel disease. DLGS and OCTN-1 have been named as further disease genes. Although the detection of disease-associated variants has greatly advanced our understanding of the primary events that lead to the development of inflammatory bowel disease in a subgroup of patients with Crohn's disease, the implications of the findings for diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms are less clear. However, it appears that there is a clear association between certain subphenotypes of Crohn's disease and the disease-associated variants in the NOD2 gene. It can be anticipated that genomic findings will profoundly influence the future therapy of inflammatory bowel disease.

Does Famotidine Induce Thrombocytopenia in Neurosurgical Patients?

The incidence of thrombocytopenia in neurosurgical patients prescribed famotidine is unknown. Using hospital records of neurosurgery patients treated between July 2001 and July 2002, a retrospective cohort study was performed comparing platelet counts in patients treated with famotidine with a similar group of patients who were not prescribed an H2 antagonist. Patients were excluded if: 1) platelets were less than 150,000 prior to famotidine administration; 2) pre-drug and post-drug platelets were not drawn; 3) they were concurrently taking a potential thrombocytopenic inducing drug; or 4) disseminated intravascular coagulation, thrombocytopenic purpura, or any other confounding hematologic disorder developed. Seventeen of 50 (34%) patients on famotidine developed thrombocytopenia compared with 11 of 98 (11.2%) of those untreated (P = 0.002). In this retrospective study, neurosurgical patients on famotidine developed thrombocytopenia statistically significantly more often than those untreated. Although no clinically significant sequelae developed as a result of the thrombocytopenia, if these findings are confirmed by a prospective study, proton pump inhibitors and sucralfate, with their similar efficacy, may be a better choice for gastrointestinal prophylaxis in neurosurgical patients.

Omeprazole-induced hepatotoxicity? A case report

CASE REPORT

We observed a serious symptomatic hepatocellular liver injury in an 85-year-old man treated with omeprazole for many years. Peak values for AST, ALT and AP were 1542 U/l (normal range 14-50), 1236 U/l (11-60) and 154 U/l (30-125) respectively. Abdominal CT scan was normal and viral serologic testing was negative. Omeprazole was discontinued and liver enzymes normalized in 12 days. The patient was known to suffer from ischemic heart disease and had had a myocardial infarction 6 months previously. He was reexposed to omeprazole and the level of liver enzymes rose again and normalized after stopping omeprazole. Despite the improvement of his liver function, the patient died 5 days later due to chronic congestive heart failure.

DISCUSSION

Five cases of omeprazole-induced liver injury have been reported to the Swiss Drug Regulatory Agency since 1990, among them two of cholestatic hepatitis and one of hepatic failure. The WHO Data Base has collected 13,630 ADRs related to omeprazole, with more than 80 cases of hepatitis, 60 of jaundice and about 40 of cholestatic hepatitis. In contrast, only one case of severe symptomatic hepatotoxicity is described in the literature. Clinical studies reported minimal increase of liver enzymes only, in 1-5% of cases.

CONCLUSION

This case with reexposure, together with those reported internationally, suggests that hepatitis is a possible but obviously rare complication of omeprazole treatment.

Switching omeprazole in Sweden and the United States

This article compares the Swedish Medical Products Agency's (MPA) decision to switch omeprazole from prescription (Rx) to over-the-counter (OTC) status with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel's decision not to authorize the switch. The agencies' differing perspectives on efficacy, safety, labeling, and clinical trial requirements are evaluated with regard to the Rx-to-OTC switch process in general and omeprazole's case in particular. The FDA and MPA regulatory policies on switches are substantially divergent. The FDA maintains a stricter set of switch guidelines and requirements than the MPA. One could infer from this that the FDA is more risk-averse than the MPA. Nevertheless, the omeprazole switch in Sweden appears to be an exception in that it contrasts with the MPA's historical reluctance to switch the Rx status of medications. Cost considerations appear to have triggered the omeprazole switch, making it a special case. The lessons to be drawn from this case study are both specific and general. At the specific level, this case study suggests the MPA's decision to switch omeprazole was prompted by economic considerations, whereas the FDA's mandate did not allow cost to affect its decision on omeprazole. At a general level, this case study indicates that the differences between the FDA and MPA with respect to their regulatory policies on switches and their mandates apply not only to omeprazole but also to the dozens of switches currently under consideration by the respective regulatory agencies.

A rational approach to uninvestigated dyspepsia in primary care: review of the literature

In this paper the rationale and limitations of the four most important approach strategies to dyspepsia in primary care (empiric treatment, prompt endoscopy, "test-and-scope", and "test-and-treat") are analysed. It is concluded that in the absence of alarm symptoms, a "test-and-treat" approach is currently the most rational approach provided that three conditions are met: (1) a highly accurate test should be used, (2) the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in the population should not be too low, and (3) an effective anti-H pylori regimen should be prescribed taking sufficient time to instruct and motivate the patient.

Polymorphism of CYP2C19 and gastric emptying in patients with proton pump inhibitor-resistant gastric ulcers

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether CYP2C19 polymorphism status and gastric emptying are related to healing in patients with gastric ulcers. We studied the CYP2C19 status in seven patients with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-resistant ulcers, 21 with PPI-sensitive ulcers and 46 healthy volunteers using polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism to detect CYP2C19m1 mutation in exon 5 and CYP2C19m2 mutation in exon 4. Gastric emptying was evaluated using the 13C-acetate breath test. The frequency of phenotypes, indicated by genotypes, did not differ significantly between the three patient groups. The peak time of 13C excretion in patients with PPI-resistant ulcers was significantly longer than that of patients with PPI-sensitive ulcers and healthy volunteers. Our results suggest that rate of gastric emptying, but not CYP2C19 polymorphism, is likely to be an important factor in the delayed healing of patients with PPI-resistant gastric ulcer.

Omeprazole treatment diminishes intra- and extracellular neutrophil reactive oxygen production and bactericidal activity

OBJECTIVE

Neutrophils play a crucial role in host defense against infectious disease. The objective was to analyze the effect of omeprazole treatment on indexes of neutrophil function in healthy subjects.

DESIGN

Open.

SETTING

University hospital.

SUBJECTS

Ten healthy subjects.

INTERVENTION

Analysis of blood samples before and after omeprazole administration.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Neutrophil Escherichia coli phagocytosis was assessed by microscopy and flow cytometry. Intracellular production of reactive oxygen intermediates was measured by flow cytometry. Extracellular reactive oxygen intermediate production was assessed with a cytochrome c reduction assay. Neutrophil bactericidal capacity and intracellular concentrations of Ca2+ were determined by fluorometry. Four hours after a single 40-mg dose of omeprazole, intra- and extracellular reactive oxygen intermediate production by neutrophils was significantly reduced compared with pretreatment values: -30% (24% to 42%) (median and range) and -22% (21% to 68%; p <.05 for both). The intracellular Ca2+ concentrations in resting neutrophils were significantly increased (+33%, 21% to 39%, compared with pretreatment concentrations, p <.001) and neutrophilic bactericidal activity was decreased (-30%, 19% to 47%, compared with pretreatment concentrations, p <.0001). Intracellular Ca2+ concentrations correlated with intracellular reactive oxygen intermediate production and neutrophilic bactericidal capacity (r =.730 and r =.618, p <.05 for both, respectively). In contrast, phagocytosis rates were not impaired by omeprazole.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results imply that omeprazole impairs production of reactive oxygen intermediates by neutrophils. Whether specific impairments of neutrophil host defenses occur in vivo remains uncertain. Reduced bactericidal activity is associated with an increase of intracellular Ca2+ concentrations in resting neutrophils.

Validation of an automated liquid chromatographic method for omeprazole in human plasma using on-line solid-phase extraction

An automated system using on-line solid-phase extraction and HPLC with UV detection has been validated in order to determine omeprazole in human plasma. The extraction was carried out using C18 cartridges. After washing, omeprazole was eluted from the cartridge with mobile phase onto an Inertsil ODS-2 column. The developed method was selective and linear for drug concentrations ranging between 5 and 500 ng ml(-1). The recovery of omeprazole ranged from 88.1 to 101.5%, and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 5 ng ml(-1). The intraday accuracy ranged from 93.1 to 106.2% and the interday accuracy varied from 95.4 to 105.1%. For the LOQ, good values of precision (8.7 and 17.5% for intraday and interday, respectively) were also obtained. This automated system has been applied to determine omeprazole in human plasma samples from bioequivalence studies.

Comparison of derivative spectrophotometric and liquid chromatographic methods for the determination of omeprazole in aqueous solutions during stability studies

A first derivative spectrophotometric method was developed for the determination of omeprazole in aqueous solutions during stability studies. The derivative procedure was based on the linear relationship between the omeprazole concentration and the first derivative amplitude at 313 nm. The first derivative spectra was developed between 200 and 400 nm (deltalambda = 8). This method was validated and compared with the official high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method of the USP. It showed good linearity in the range of concentrations studied (10-30 microg ml(-1)), precision (repeatability and inter-day reproducibility), recovery and specificity in stability studies. It also seemed to be 2.59 times more sensitive than the HPLC method. These results allowed to consider this procedure as useful for the rapid analysis of omeprazole in stability studies since there was no interference with its decomposition products.

Proton pump inhibitors. Pharmacology and rationale for use in gastrointestinal disorders

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are drugs which irreversibly inhibit proton pump (H+/K+ ATPase) function and are the most potent gastric acid-suppressing agents in clinical use. There is now a substantial body of evidence showing improved efficacy of PPIs over the histamine H2 receptor antagonists and other drugs in acid-related disorders. Omeprazole 20 mg/day, lansoprazole 30 mg/day, pantoprazole 40 mg/day or rabeprazole 20 mg/day for 2 to 4 weeks are more effective than standard doses of H2-receptor antagonists in healing duodenal and gastric ulcers. Patients with gastric ulcers should receive standard doses of PPIs as for duodenal ulcers but for a longer time period (4 to 8 weeks). There is no conclusive evidence to support the use of a particular PPI over another for either duodenal or gastric ulcer healing. For Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulceration, a combination of a PPI and 2 antibacterials will eradicate H. pylori in over 90% of cases and significantly reduce ulcer recurrence. Patients with H. pylori-positive gastric ulcers should be managed similarly. PPIs also have efficacy advantages over ranitidine and misoprostol and are better tolerated than misoprostol in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In endoscopically proven gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, standard daily doses of the PPIs are more effective than H2-receptor antagonists for healing, and patients should receive a 4 to 8 week course of treatment. For severe reflux, with ulceration and/or stricture formation, a higher dose regimen (omeprazole 40 mg, lansoprazole 60 mg, pantoprazole 80 mg or rabeprazole 40 mg daily) appears to yield better healing rates. There is little evidence that PPIs lead to resolution of Barrett's oesophagus or a reduction of subsequent adenocarcinoma development, but PPIs are indicated in healing of any associated ulceration. In Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, PPIs have become the treatment of choice for the management of gastric acid hypersecretion.

Biochemical and pharmacological characteristics of 3-butyryl-8-methoxy-4-[(2-thiophenyl)amino]quinoline, a new proton-pump inhibitor, in rabbit gastric microsomes and in rats

We have investigated the properties of the newly synthesized proton-pump inhibitor, 3-butyryl-8-methoxy-4-[(2-thiophenyl)amino]quinoline (YJA20379-6), on gastric mucosal proton-pump (H+/K+-ATPase) activity, gastric acid secretion and gastroduodenal lesions in experimental rats. YJA20379-6 markedly inhibited H+/K+-ATPase activity in rabbit isolated gastric mucosal microsomes, confirming its classification as a proton-pump inhibitor. The inhibitory efficacy of YJA20379-6 on the proton pump was approximately 14-times higher than that of omeprazole at pH 7.4. YJA20379-6 given intraduodenally had a potent inhibitory effect on gastric secretion in pylorus-ligated rats (ED50 22.9 mg kg(-1)) but was less active than omeprazole. Pretreatment of rats with YJA20379-6 dose-dependently protected the gastric mucosa from damage induced by water-immersion stress, indomethacin and absolute ethanol, and the duodenal mucosa from damage induced by mepirizole. Repeated administration of YJA20379-6 also dose-dependently accelerated the spontaneous healing of acetic acid-induced gastric ulcers. These results suggest that YJA20379-6 has potent anti-secretory and anti-ulcer effects which are exerted by suppression of H+/K+-ATPase activity in gastric parietal cells. YJA20379-6 might be useful for the clinical treatment of peptic ulcer diseases.

Determination of omeprazole in pharmaceuticals by derivative spectroscopy

A new derivative UV spectroscopic method was developed for the analysis of omeprazole in borate buffer (pH 10.0; 0.1 M). Second derivative spectra were generated between 200-400 nm at N = 9, delta gamma = 31.5. The linearity range for values obtained from second derivative spectra was 0.2-40.0 micrograms ml-1. The developed method was applied to five different commercial preparations of hard gelatin capsules containing enteric coated granules. The relative standard deviations were found to be 2.24% (brand A), 1.87% (brand B), 2.80% (brand C), 4.55% (brand D) and 1.09% (brand E). The data were compared with ones obtained from the polarographic method given in the literature and no difference was found statistically.

Effects of gastrin on the histamine-secretory and proliferative activity of cultured carcinoid cells derived from the stomach of the rodent Mastomys natalensis

The effects of gastrin on the synthesis and release of histamine and on cellular proliferation were investigated in a homotransplantable carcinoid tumor implanted in the rodent Mastomys natalensis and in cultured cells derived from the tumor. The homotransplanted tumor was immunopositive for histamine, synaptophysin and protein gene product 9.5, and its cells contained numerous secretory granules that were visualized by electron microscopy. When carcinoid cells were cultured in a medium with a high concentration of gastrin-I (10(4) pg/mL) for 7 days, large electron-dense secretory granules were characteristically observed in the cytoplasm. By contrast, only a few such granules and numerous secondary lysosomes were seen in cells that had been cultured in the same medium without gastrin-I. A high concentration of gastrin-I (10(4) pg/mL) significantly increased the release of histamine into the culture medium from the carcinoid cells compared with the control (P < 0.05). Cellular proliferation, as determined by monitoring the incorporation of [methyl-3H]-thymidine into the carcinoid cells increased significantly at lower concentrations of gastrin-I (10(2) and 10(3) pg/mL), (P < 0.05). At higher concentrations (10(4) pg/mL or more), gastrin-I had no effect on proliferation. These findings indicate that gastrin stimulates the synthesis and release of histamine by carcinoid cells, as well as their proliferation.

Policy analysis of the conversion of histamine2 antagonists to over-the-counter use

OBJECTIVES

The authors assess the costs associated with treatment of dyspepsia with histamine2 antagonists versus without availability of over-the-counter (OTC).

METHODS

A cost analysis was performed using a decision-analysis model. Patients with an initial episode of dyspepsia were studied. The model includes costs associated with consumption of OTC and prescription (Rx) medications for dyspepsia, physician visits and associated diagnostic testing, time spent for physician visits and diagnostic tests, and hospitalization costs.

RESULTS

The model is sensitive to the relative cost of histamine2 antagonists when purchased Rx or OTC, as well as to the efficacy of these drugs in relieving dyspeptic symptoms. For patients with nonulcer dyspepsia (the largest group of likely consumers), the model demonstrates a cost savings if the OTC cost of the medication is slightly less than one third the Rx cost. Costs are similar whether or not histamine2 antagonists are available OTC. If the symptom relief efficacies of histamine2 antagonists are equivalent whether purchased by prescription only or OTC, then the health-care expenditures for a typical patient with dyspepsia are $204 for OTC availability and $203 for Rx-only use. Viewing costs from the perspective of a managed-care organization, expenditures for an episode of dyspepsia are $149 regardless of whether or not histamine2 antagonists are available OTC. Restricting the analysis to patients with underlying nonulcer dyspepsia yields similar results. Variation of numerous assumptions and probabilities other than histamine antagonist cost and efficacy, including costs associated with physician visits and diagnostic tests, and the likelihood of seeking medical care, do not substantially affect the results of the model.

CONCLUSIONS

Health-care costs associated with initial treatment of dyspepsia are similar regardless of the availability of histamine2 antagonists OTC. This is due largely to the similar efficacy of these drugs compared with antacids and the predicted increase in diagnostic testing that may result if a patient visits a physician after failure to achieve symptom relief with OTC use of histamine2 antagonists.

The randomized controlled clinical trial in gastroenterology: the Danish contributions from 1970 to 1994

More than 200 Danish randomized controlled clinical trials in gastroenterology published from 1970 to 1994 were retrieved by electronic media, by hand-searching relevant journals, and by direct requests to Danish gastroenterologists. With the historical perspective through a quarter of a century, these papers are outlined to provide a survey of the pieces of information that Danish gastroenterologists have contributed to the present knowledge of therapeutics. The presented randomized controlled clinical trials constitute an impressive sum of knowledge within a diversity of topics. A cautious analysis of the time pattern for the publications in addition to the contents of the reports discloses that the discipline of planning and executing relevant controlled clinical trials is now in blossom in Danish gastroenterology.

Effect of omeprazole and feeding on plasma gastrin in patients with achlorhydria

BACKGROUND

The mechanism of hypergastrinaemia during omeprazole therapy is unclear, but is generally assumed to be entirely a consequence of acid suppression. However, direct stimulation of G cells by omeprazole could also be a factor. In order to further investigate the mechanism of omeprazole-induced hypergastrinaemia, we have studied the effects of the drug on plasma gastrin in patients with achlorhydria, in whom altered acid secretion cannot play a role.

METHODS

We estimated fasting and peptone meal stimulated plasma gastrin in nine patients (seven female) with pernicious anaemia and achlorhydria, before and on the final day of 4 weeks' dosing with omeprazole 40 mg daily.

RESULTS

Despite the high fasting gastrin concentrations, the peptone meal produced a further elevation in plasma gastrin concentrations, median gastrin concentrations rising from 1500 ng/L (range 225-10,875 ng/L) to 3750 ng/L (range 585-15,600 ng/L) post-prandially (P = 0.004). The median post-prandial rise in plasma gastrin at this initial visit was 44% (3-260%), and the median time interval until plasma gastrin concentrations returned to fasting levels was 120 min (range 10- > 150 min). There was a significant negative correlation between fasting plasma gastrin concentrations and the percentage increase in plasma gastrin levels in response to meal stimulation (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.79, P = 0.01). Fasting plasma gastrin concentrations were similar pre-omeprazole (median 1950 ng/L, range 240-16,500 ng/L) and post-omeprazole (median 1500 ng/L, range 315-7650 ng/L). Likewise, peak plasma gastrin concentrations were also similar pre-omeprazole (median 2700 ng/L, range 585-16,500 ng/L) and post omeprazole (median 3420 ng/L, range 720-11,250 ng/L).

CONCLUSIONS

(i) The hyperplastic G cell mass in patients with pernicious anaemia can be further stimulated by a peptone meal, which causes a prolonged rise in plasma gastrin concentrations. (ii) There is a negative correlation between fasting plasma gastrin concentrations and the percentage increase in plasma gastrin levels in response to meal stimulation. (iii) Omeprazole has no effect on plasma gastrin in achlorhydric patients, which is consistent with its hypergastrinaemic effect being entirely secondary to acid inhibition.

Effects of ranitidine on gastric vesicles containing H+,K(+)-adenosine triphosphatase in rats

BACKGROUND

To ascertain the mechanism for rebound acid hypersecretion after treatment with an H2-receptor blocker, we investigated the effects of ranitidine on gastric H+,K(+)-adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) in rats.

METHODS

Male Wistar rats received ranitidine (1-50 mg/kg body weight intraperitoneally twice a day for 5 days). The rats were starved for 15 h after the last treatment and then killed, and gastric vesicles containing H+,K(+)-ATPase were prepared.

RESULTS

Treatment with ranitidine dose-dependently increased protein content in the gastric vesicular fraction purified from the gastric mucosa without changing total protein content. Ranitidine also increased the content of a 94,000-dalton protein, the catalytic subunit of H+,K(+)-ATPase. On the other hand, ranitidine did not affect the specific activity of the enzyme (mumol/min/mg of the gastric vesicular protein). Since gastric vesicles in the fasting state mainly consist of the tubulovesicular membrane, these results suggest that ranidine administration increases total tubulovesicular H+,K(+)-ATPase content (mumol/min/rat) by increasing the number of tubulovesicles per parietal cell. The ranitidine-induced increase in total tubulovesicular H+,K(+)-ATPase activity was still evident 1 week after treatment and returned to control level 1 month later.

CONCLUSIONS

All these findings suggest that the increased content and total activity of tubulovesicular H+,K(+)-ATPase after ranitidine treatment may contribute to the mechanism for acid rebound after H2-blocker therapy.

The liver regenerative response elicited by antisecretory agents in partially hepatectomized rats: a comparison between omeprazole and famotidine

Liver regeneration after omeprazole (OMP) or famotidine (FAM) administration was examined in 66% hepatectomized rats. The regeneration was evaluated by the liver weight as a percentage of body weight (LRR) and the proportion of hepatocytes in mitosis per 1,000 counts (MI). Administration of OMP 0.4 mg/kg per day for 3 or 7 days suppressed LRR and MI 3 and 7 days after hepatectomy. However, the administration of FAM 0.8 mg/kg per day for 3 or 7 days did not change either LRR or MI. Increased gastrin levels in the blood were seen only after OMP administration. The food intake was unchanged by OMP or FAM, but FAM increased water intake. The liver functional score, glutamic pyruvic transaminase and alkaline phosphatase in the blood all increased with OMP, but FAM had no apparent effect on the hepatic or renal function. These observations suggest that a large dosage of OMP suppresses liver regeneration, while FAM appears to have no meaningful effect on regeneration.

Comparison of pantoprazole versus omeprazole in the treatment of acute duodenal ulceration--a multicentre study

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, multicentre study, the proton pump inhibitors pantoprazole and omeprazole were compared in patients with active duodenal ulcers. Two hundred and seventy-six protocol-correct patients received either pantoprazole 40 mg (n = 185) or omeprazole 20 mg (n = 91), once daily for 2 or 4 weeks, depending on the progress of ulcer healing.

RESULTS

Rates of complete ulcer healing after 2 weeks were 71% in patients given pantoprazole and 74% in patients given omeprazole. After 4 weeks the figures were 96% and 91%, respectively. These differences were not significant. There was no significant difference in ulcer pain prior to treatment, and 85% of the pantoprazole group and 86% on omeprazole were pain-free after 2 weeks (not significant). The time until complete pain relief with pantoprazole or omeprazole, based on data from diary cards, was not significantly different (P > 0.05, Uleman's U-test). Both treatments were equally well tolerated. Changes in routine laboratory parameters were minimal in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Pantoprazole was shown to be a highly-effective and well-tolerated treatment for acute duodenal ulcer. Pantoprazole 40 mg and omeprazole 20 mg were equally effective with respect to ulcer healing and pain relief, and have similar adverse event profiles.

The time course of gastric pH changes induced by omeprazole and ranitidine: a 24-hour dose-response study

The time-course of the effects of single-dose acid-reducing therapy in surgical patients is not known. Therefore, a prospective, randomized trial compared the effects of single-dose administration of omeprazole or ranitidine on gastric pH in 52 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. The two drugs were administered intravenously in random fashion after placement of a gastric electrode for continuous 24-h pH monitoring In patients receiving omeprazole 20 mg (n = 13) and 40 mg (n = 13), gastric pH > or = 2.5 was achieved after a median of 80 (range 15-269) min and 40 (6-102) min (P = not significant [NS]), whereas in those receiving ranitidine 25 mg (n = 13) and 50 mg (n = 13), this pH was reached after a median of 32 (15-82) and 44 (16-84) min, respectively (P = NS). Over the first 24 h postoperatively, gastric pH remained less than 2.5 for a significantly longer time (1060 min vs 611 min), and more than 4.0 for a significantly shorter time (240 min vs 780 min) after omeprazole 20 mg than after ranitidine 50 mg. There were no other significant differences among treatment groups regarding the duration of gastric pH less than 2.5, between 2.5 and 4.0, and more than 4.0. In all treatment groups, the gastric pH returned to the baseline value of < 2.0 within 18 h. We conclude that when it is desired that gastric pH be more than 4.0 for at least 3 h, a single dose of ranitidine 25 mg or 50 mg should be administered 30-45 min prior to induction of anesthesia.

Omeprazole and dry mouth

BACKGROUND

Omeprazole causes irreversible inhibition of the hydrogen/potassium adenosine triphosphatase enzyme, leading to a marked reduction in both acid secretion and volume of gastric juice. Reported side-effects include nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, and headache. We report the development of dry mouth during omeprazole therapy.

METHODS

We have identified six patients taking omeprazole for more than 6 weeks who complained of a dry mouth. Salivary production was measured as whole salivary flow produced over a 10-min period spat into a collecting vessel and as 5% citric acid-stimulated parotid salivary flow collected with a Lashley cup device placed over the parotid duct. Flow rates were evaluated both during and after cessation of treatment. Saliva produced was then cultured for microbes.

RESULTS

Four of the six had subnormal parotid or whole salivary flow rates on treatment that recovered after stopping treatment. The increase after treatment was marked in four. Significant amounts of Candida albicans grew from the saliva of the three patients with the lowest salivary flows; one saliva also grew Staphylococcus aureus.

CONCLUSION

Salivary flow is reduced in some patients treated with omeprazole, returning to normal after cessation of treatment. This reduction may predispose to opportunistic infection, particularly in the edentulous.

Pantoprazole versus omeprazole in the treatment of acute gastric ulcers

BACKGROUND

Pantoprazole is a new substituted benzimidazole which is a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion by its action upon H+,K(+)-ATPase.

METHODS

The proton pump inhibitors pantoprazole and omeprazole were compared in a randomized, double-blind study in 219 patients with benign gastric ulcers. Patients received either pantoprazole 40 mg (n = 146) or omeprazole 20 mg (n = 73), once daily before breakfast for 4 weeks. Treatment was extended for a further 4 weeks if the ulcer had not healed.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks, complete ulcer healing was seen in 88% of protocol-correct patients given pantoprazole and in 77% given omeprazole (between-group difference P < 0.05). At 8 weeks, the corresponding values were 97% and 96% (not significant). In the comparative intention-to-treat analysis there were no statistical differences between the treatment groups. Among the patients who had ulcer pain prior to treatment, 79% of the pantoprazole group and 68% of the omeprazole group were pain-free after 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks 88% and 81%, respectively (not significant). Pronounced improvement in the other gastrointestinal symptoms was seen in both groups. Only 10% of patients in each group reported adverse events. There were moderate increases in fasting serum gastrin levels with both treatments at 4 and 8 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Pantoprazole, 40 mg once daily in the morning, is a highly effective, well tolerated treatment for acute, benign gastric ulcer. Pantoprazole and omeprazole were equally safe in the therapy of gastric ulcer.

Effect of cimetidine and omeprazole on gastric ulcer healing of rats with limited food intake time

The effects of cimetidine, omeprazole and atropine sulfate on the healing of acetic acid-induced gastric ulcers in rats with limited food intake time (9:00-10:00 a.m. and 5:00-6:00 p.m.) were evaluated 15 days after the acid injection. Oral repeated administration of cimetidine (25-100 mg/kg twice daily) or omeprazole (10-50 mg/kg once daily) dose dependently accelerated ulcer healing. Atropine sulfate (10 mg/kg twice daily, p.o.) was ineffective. A single oral administration of omeprazole (50 mg/kg) or cimetidine (100 mg/kg) resulted in potent and long-lasting anti-acid secretory and gastrin-releasing actions. The degree and duration of anti-acid secretion by atropine sulfate were equal to those of cimetidine, but the elevation of gastrin release by atropine sulfate was weak and temporary. These results indicate that the gastric ulcers of rats with a limited food intake time are useful for evaluating the healing effects of cimetidine and omeprazole on gastric ulcers. In addition, the effects of both drugs may be related to the increased gastrin release rather than to the reduced acid secretion.

Long term treatment with omeprazole 20 mg three days a week or 10 mg daily in the prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare omeprazole 10 mg o.m. (daily) with omeprazole 20 mg o.m. on Friday to Sunday inclusive (weekend) in the prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse over a 6-month period.

METHODS

After an open healing phase (4 to 8 weeks) with omeprazole 20 mg o.m., 81 patients entered the follow-up phase. Forty-two were randomized in a double-blind double-dummy technique, to omeprazole 10 mg o.m., and 39 to omeprazole 20 mg at weekends. At 3 and 6 months or on symptomatic relapse the patients underwent endoscopy with gastric biopsies (quantitative assessment of argyrophilic and gastrin cells), symptom evaluation, and laboratory screening with fasting serum gastrin.

RESULTS

Five patients in the 10 mg group and four in the weekend group were lost to follow-up. The estimated relapse rates over six months in the two groups receiving 10 mg daily or 20 mg at weekends were 19% and 31%, respectively (95% CI of percentage difference: -33% to 8%: intention-to-treat analysis, P = N.S.). During the follow-up phase, symptoms tended to be milder in the omeprazole 10 mg daily group compared to the weekend group. Gastrin levels increased significantly during the healing phase but then stayed almost constant in the omeprazole 10 mg group, and significantly decreased with weekend treatment. The median number of argyrophilic cells showed a slight but statistically significant increase in the omeprazole 10 mg daily group, but did not change in the weekend group. Both the healing and long-term therapies were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data do not show a clear difference between the two treatment regimens, but there was a tendency towards a lower recurrence rate with omeprazole 10 mg daily compared with 20 mg weekend therapy.

First-pass metabolism of omeprazole in rats

To clarify the in vivo first-pass metabolism of omeprazole, the pharmacokinetics were examined after oral, intraduodenal (i.d.), intraportal venous (i.p.v), and intravenous (i.v.) administration at various doses to rats. Extraction ratios in the liver and intestinal tract were determined from the areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for i.p.v. and i.v. administration and from those for id and ipv administration, respectively. Assuming that the drug was absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract completely, the hepatic and intestinal extraction ratios were 0.80, 0.63, and 0.59 at doses of 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg and 0.70 and 0.73 at doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg, respectively. The bioavailability of orally administered omeprazole was 6.4, 9.6, and 12.6% at the doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg, respectively. There were no differences in the distribution volume of steady state, total clearance, or elimination half-life at any doses. In addition, the AUC value after oral administration (20 mg/kg) in rats acutely intoxicated with CCl4 was 2.4 times larger than that in the control. These findings suggest that omeprazole undergoes a first-pass metabolism in the intestinal mucosa and/or lumen, as well as in the liver, and that the major contribution to the dose-dependent increase in bioavailability is a saturation of the first-pass metabolism in the liver.

Antacid provides better restoration of glandular structures within the gastric ulcer scar than omeprazole

Mucosa of healed gastric ulcers displays histological abnormalities that are possibly the basis of ulcer recurrence. The influence of antacid and omeprazole treatment was studied on the quality of ulcer healing. Sixty four rats with gastric cryoulcers were treated daily either with placebo, antacid, omeprazole, or antacid plus omeprazole. Ulcer size was measured three times per week with a novel video endoscopic method. Prostaglandin generation (day 6), cell proliferation (day 8 and 15), height and cell composition of ulcer margin (day 8), and mucosal scar (day 15) were quantitatively assessed. Antacid, omeprazole, and antacid plus omeprazole significantly accelerated ulcer healing predominantly during days 3-8. Compared with placebo, the height of ulcer margin and mucosal ulcer scar was significantly increased in antacid (+7 and +9% respectively) and significantly decreased in omeprazole (-33 and -22% respectively) and antacid plus omeprazole (-26 and -18% respectively) treated rats. The number of bromodeoxyuridine labelled cells (+42%, day 8), epithelial cell mass (+42%, day 15), and the ratios of epithelial cells/connective tissue (+73%, day 15) and epithelial cells/gland lumen (+100%, day 15) were significantly increased in antacid treated rats. In conclusion, both antacid and omeprazole accelerate ulcer healing but antacid provides a better quality of healing. This advantage is lost by cotreatment with omeprazole.

Effect of omeprazole and sucralfate on prepyloric gastric ulcer. A double blind comparative trial and one year follow up

This study compared healing rates, relief of symptoms, frequency of adverse events, and proportion of patients in remission after one year follow up in 104 patients with active prepyloric ulcer during treatment with 40 mg omeprazole once daily or 2 g sucralfate twice daily, using a randomised double blind controlled trial. Healing rates after two, four, and six weeks were (omeprazole/sucralfate) 49%/23%; 83%/59%; 90%/70% respectively. After two weeks, omeprazole was more efficient than sucralfate in relief of daytime and nocturnal epigastric pain, nausea, and heartburn. The proportion of patients in remission after one year follow up was significantly higher in the omeprazole group (p < 0.01). Of the healed patients ulcers recurred in 36% in the omeprazole group and in 46% in the sucralfate group. It is concluded that the ulcer healing rate was higher and symptom relief was more pronounced in the omeprazole group compared with the sucralfate group, and that more patients were still in remission after a one year follow up period.

[Omeprazole and liver functions]

Omeprazole is the first of a new class of drugs (proton pump blockers) approved in the United States and in Europe for its high efficiency as an inhibitor of gastric acid secretion. Omeprazole is a drug for short term use in patients with acid-peptic disease. A limited prevalence of hepatotoxic effects is reported by some authors (transitory rise in serum aminotransferase level) and it may be prescribed in patients with chronic liver disease although slower metabolism and greater bioavailability are observed. Omeprazole interacts with the cytochrome P-450 system in the liver: inhibition of several liver mono-oxygenases activities (inhibitory effect on diazepam, phenytoin and R-warfarin metabolism with prolonged elimination); induction of P-450 (IA1 and IA2) enzymes that may potentiate the hepatotoxic effect of phenacetin and acetaminophen or increase the tumorigenic effect of chemical carcinogens (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, arylamines, aflatoxin). This latter concern is unfounded as based on a false extrapolation from the results of in vitro studies to those of in vivo situations. However, although omeprazole has proved to be remarkably free of side effects, postmarketing surveillance is recommended for potential interaction with other drugs that are known to be metabolized by the same liver enzymes.

Effect of synthetic prostaglandin E2 analog enprostil on omeprazole-induced hypergastrinemia and hyperpepsinogenemia

This study was undertaken to determine whether the synthetic prostaglandin E2 analog enprostil is able to inhibit basal and postprandial hypergastrinemia induced by omeprazole. We also studied the effect of omeprazole, enprostil, and the combination of both drugs on serum pepsinogen A and C levels. Eight normal subjects received in random order five-day courses of 40 mg omeprazole once a day, 35 micrograms enprostil three times a day, the combination of both drugs, and placebo. Omeprazole induced significant increases in basal and postprandial serum gastrin and in pepsinogen A and C levels. These increments persisted on the day after stopping treatment. Coadministration of enprostil inhibited omeprazole-induced basal hypergastrinemia and postprandial integrated serum gastrin, but not basal serum pepsinogen A and C, while the inhibition on the day after the treatment courses only reached statistical significance for the postprandial integrated serum gastrin concentration. It is concluded that enprostil inhibits omeprazole-induced basal and postprandial hypergastrinemia, with a tendency to protracted inhibition after stopping the drugs, and that enprostil does not significantly influence omeprazole-induced increases in pepsinogen A and C level. Coadministration of enprostil may be helpful in preventing pronounced hypergastrinemia in the few patients who show large serum gastrin increases during treatment with omeprazole.

Antacids. Indications and limitations

Antacids have served us well for over a century. In terms of peptic ulcer disease, the attitude in the late 1950s to 1970s that antacids should be taken only on demand was unjustified and erroneous. 13 recent endoscopic controlled studies have confirmed the efficacy of antacids in the healing of duodenal ulcer, achieving about 75% healing in 4 weeks. The efficacy of antacids in promoting gastric ulcer healing has been less well studied and the results are controversial. The most appropriate and economical antacid regimens for the treatment of duodenal ulcer disease should include tablets or liquid that have acid neutralising capacity of 400 mmol/day given at least an hour after meals. As a long term therapy, antacids appear to work, but need be taken in multiple daily doses, a regimen which is unlikely to meet with long term patient compliance. Patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disorders or pregnancy-related reflux have also benefited from the usage of antacids ad libitum. Early previous studies have clearly demonstrated the efficacy of antacids in reducing gastro-oesophageal reflux and healing of reflux oesophagitis. The acidity of the gastric contents is the major determining factor in the outcome of the aspiration pneumonitis occurring during delivery. The prophylactic use of antacids during delivery has helped to reduce the severity of this complication. Similarly, the prophylactic administration of antacid aiming to maintain gastric pH between 3.5 to 7.0 has resulted in significant reduction of bleeding due to stress associated ulcers and/or erosive haemorrhagic gastritis in critically ill patients. Antacid therapy, however, is controversial in the management of nonulcer dyspepsia or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug related upper gastrointestinal mucosal damage. Undoubtedly, antacids have major roles to play in the treatment of gastric acid related disorders. They have clear advantages and disadvantages when compared with the antisecretory agents. New proton pump inhibitors in particular have certainly superseded antacids and even the H2-receptor antagonists in many respects. However, the long term safety record of antacids remains unsurpassed by any of the new antisecretory agents.