A randomized clinical trial of the noninvasive and invasive approaches to drug therapy of ventricular tachycardia

[History of clinical electrophysiology in diagnosing and treatment monitoring of high ventricular vulnerability]

The paper presents the history of hope from 1980-1995 to predict the risk of sudden arrhythmic death using electrophysiologic techniques in individual patients. Even if this prediction seems possible in selected highly risk cohorts, many more patients will die in ventricular arrhythmia without fulfilling the criteria. Ultimately, high risk of sudden cardiac death can be predicted in selected patient groups, but not in the majority of patients at risk. It is a history of dashed hope.

Genetics of atrial fibrillation-practical applications for clinical management: if not now, when and how?

The prevalence and economic burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) are predicted to more than double over the next few decades. In addition to anticoagulation and treatment of concomitant cardiovascular conditions, early and standardized rhythm control therapy reduces cardiovascular outcomes as compared with a rate control approach, favouring the restoration, and maintenance of sinus rhythm safely. Current therapies for rhythm control of AF include antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) and catheter ablation (CA). However, response in an individual patient is highly variable with some remaining free of AF for long periods on antiarrhythmic therapy, while others require repeat AF ablation within weeks. The limited success of rhythm control therapy for AF is in part related to incomplete understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms and our inability to predict responses in individual patients. Thus, a major knowledge gap is predicting which patients with AF are likely to respond to rhythm control approach. Over the last decade, tremendous progress has been made in defining the genetic architecture of AF with the identification of rare mutations in cardiac ion channels, signalling molecules, and myocardial structural proteins associated with familial (early-onset) AF. Conversely, genome-wide association studies have identified common variants at over 100 genetic loci and the development of polygenic risk scores has identified high-risk individuals. Although retrospective studies suggest that response to AADs and CA is modulated in part by common genetic variation, the development of a comprehensive clinical and genetic risk score may enable the translation of genetic data to the bedside care of AF patients. Given the economic impact of the AF epidemic, even small changes in therapeutic efficacy may lead to substantial improvements for patients and health care systems.

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: does everybody need one?

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has emerged as an effective, but expensive, therapy for arrhythmic sudden cardiac death. ICD use has been increasing by 20% to 30% per year. Clinical trials have shown that the ICD can be effective for both the primary prevention and the secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death in selected populations. Despite the available trial evidence, several issues pertaining to ICD use remain unresolved, including the treatment of patients not represented in clinical trials, the optimal selection of patients who will benefit from an ICD, the duration of benefit from an ICD, the quality of life for patients with an ICD, and both the cost-effectiveness and the cost impact of the ICD. These considerations are discussed in this article.

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the Multicenter UnSustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT): drug testing and as-treated analysis

OBJECTIVES

Using data from the Multicenter UnSustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT), we examined the factors used to select antiarrhythmic drug therapy and their impact on outcomes.

BACKGROUND

The MUSTT examined the use of programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) to guide antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with coronary arteriosclerosis, left ventricular dysfunction and asymptomatic, unsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Trial outcomes may reflect factors used to select antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

METHODS

We compared subgroups of patients with inducible sustained VT randomized to PVS-guided antiarrhythmic therapy (n = 351), in particular those receiving PVS-guided antiarrhythmic drug therapy (n = 142) versus no antiarrhythmic therapy (controls, n = 353).

RESULTS

"Effective" antiarrhythmic drug therapy (i.e., the term "effective" was used to denote therapy that resulted in noninducible VT or hemodynamically stable induced VT) was found for 142 of the 351 patients (43%), most often at the first or second PVS session (125/142, 88%). Mortality among the 142 patients did not differ from that among control patients. Of these 142 patients, the PVS end point was noninducibility in 91 patients and stable VT in 51 patients. Mortality did not differ between these two groups either, but arrhythmia was numerically more frequent in the PVS-induced stable VT group. Mortality was greatest in the few patients receiving propafenone (unadjusted p = 0.07, adjusted p = 0.14 vs. controls), but mortality with all agents did not differ from that of controls, even after adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

Even when presenting the results as favorably as possible, we found no benefit with PVS-guided drug therapy in patients with clinical unsustained VT who had inducible sustained VT. These findings are unaltered by using different end points for PVS or considering the response to individual drugs.

Matching cardiac rhythm management technology to patient needs: pacing/ablation/implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Data from 2 decades of clinical electrophysiologic studies have allowed great progress in the evaluation and treatment of patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias and the appropriate identification of those patients at high risk for subsequent sudden death. The goals of treatment of the patient with ventricular arrhythmias are to suppress symptoms and prevent a fatal event. The steps in providing such therapy include (1) defining the cardiac anatomy; (2) assessing arrhythmia risk through noninvasive or invasive testing; and (3) prescribing treatment based on these results. Patients may be separated into high- and low-risk groups to help identify appropriate treatment. Although low-risk groups may benefit from reassurance or medications such as beta-blockers or verapamil, high-risk groups have been more difficult to treat. Recent randomized trials of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for ventricular arrhythmias suggest that they may provide better protection for high-risk patients than do antiarrhythmic medications.

Drug therapy of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Is there still a role?

This article provides a review of the risks faced by patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the absence of a reversible or transient cause so that the goals of therapy can be clearly defined. The therapeutic approaches that have been proposed to achieve these goals are outlined and evidence comparing these various approaches to therapy is then summarized in order to propose an algorithm for the optimal use of antiarrhythmic drug therapies as primary therapy for selected VT/VF patients. Options for the ancillary uses of antiarrhythmic drug therapies in ICD patients are considered.

Management of ventricular arrhythmias: a trial-based approach

Sudden cardiac death accounts for approximately 300,000 deaths annually in the U.S., and most of these are secondary to ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation in patients with coronary artery disease. Most patients with cardiac death die before reaching the hospital, which brought about a tremendous amount of research focused at identifying patients at high risk. Several trials were initiated to test the effectiveness of various therapeutic measures in these high-risk patients. A history of myocardial infarction, depressed left ventricular function and nonsustained VT have all been identified as independent risk factors for future arrhythmic death. Similarly, patients with a history of sustained VT or a history of sudden cardiac death are a high-risk group and should be aggressively evaluated and treated. The purpose of this article is to discuss risk stratification and primary prevention of sustained ventricular arrhythmias. We also review the recent secondary prevention trials and discuss the options available in the management of patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias.

Electrophysiologic parameters to predict clinical recurrence of ventricular tachycardia in patients under electrophysiologic study-guided effective pharmacological therapy

Although an electrophysiologic study (EPS) is the most reliable method for selecting the treatment for a patient with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), VT recurrence may occur even during EPS-guided effective therapy. Electrophysiologic parameters were compared between patients with and without arrhythmic events under EPS-guided effective therapy to identify the predictive parameters of VT recurrence during the clinical course. The study population consisted of 77 consecutive patients with sustained VT who were receiving long-term pharmacological therapy that was demonstrated to be effective by the EPS assessment. The VT induction protocol employed 1-3 extrastimuli and rapid ventricular pacing at 2 right ventricular sites and 1 left ventricular site, and isoproterenol was infused when VT was not induced. To determine the 'effective' antiarrhythmic drug, all sustained ventricular arrhythmias had to be prevented during the whole induction protocol, but repetitive ventricular responses (RVR) were allowed to remain for up to 5 beats when they were in the same QRS configurations as the clinical VT and up to 12 beats when they were in polymorphic QRS configurations. The effective refractory periods (ERPs) at the 3 ventricular pacing sites and their difference (i.e., ERP-dispersion) and the maximum number of RVR beats were evaluated in an EPS during the control state and at the time of drug assessment. In the comparison of patients with and without VT recurrence, there was no significant difference in clinical characteristics or ERPs, but the deltaERP-dispersion (i.e., the increase in ERP-dispersion caused by the antiarrhythmic drug) and the maximum number of RVRs were significantly smaller in the group of patients without VT recurrence (deltaERP-dis, -3+/-8 vs. 6+/-12, p = 0.0027; maxRVR, 3+/-3 vs. 5+/-4, p = 0.0160). The VT recurrence rate was significantly lower in the patients with deltaERP-dis < or =0 or maxRVR<6 in comparison with the others (p = 0.01 14 and p = 0.0360). Patients with VT recurrence showed greater deltaERP-disp and a longer duration of RVRs at the time of drug assessment in comparison with the patients without VT recurrence. The prognosis of patients under EPS-guided therapy may be improved by the use of stricter criteria for drug assessment in the EPS, although this may decrease the number of drug responders determined in the EPS.

Sudden Cardiac Death

Great strides have been made in the approach to the management of sudden cardiac death. Patients who have been successfully resuscitated from an episode of sudden cardiac death are at high risk of recurrence. Much larger groups of patients who have not had episodes of sudden cardiac death are also at substantial risk for this event, however. Because the survival rates associated with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are dismal, these high-risk populations must be targeted for prophylaxis. Beta-blockers have been shown to be an effective pharmacologic therapy in patients who have had myocardial infarction and, most recently, in patients with congestive heart failure. When possible, these agents should be used in these populations. No class I or class III antiarrhythmic drugs, with the possible exception of amiodarone, have been shown to have efficacy as prophylactic agents for the reduction of mortality in these populations. In patients who have hemodynamically significant sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias or an aborted episode of sudden cardiac death, the current therapy of choice is an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). For prophylaxis of sudden cardiac death in patients who have not had a previous event, several approaches may be considered. Currently, the best therapeutic approach for prophylaxis of sudden cardiac death seems to be the ICD; however, use of this device can be justified only in patients at substantial risk of sudden cardiac death. Defining the high-risk populations that will benefit from ICDs is critical in managing the problem of sudden cardiac death.

Significance of abnormal root mean square voltages in signal averaged electrocardiogram as a reliable predictor of sustained ventricular tachycardia

The late potential is useful to predict patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, because positive predictive value for sustained VT is low, the validity of late potential for screening the patients to be studied by electrophysiological tests was not high. We examined 923 cases, including 63 cases of sustained VT. When we separated patients showing abnormal values of the root mean square voltage of the QRS end part 40 milliseconds (RMS40) into four groups, there was a tendency of a higher incidence of sustained VT with lower value of RMS40. When we conducted electrophysiological tests on 121 cases without sustained VT, it turned out a high induction rate of sustained VT in patients with low RMS40 values (RMS40 < 10 microV, 67%; < 20 microV, 30%; 20 microV, < or = 5%). We conclude abnormally low value (less than 10 microV) of RMS40 can be useful for screening the late potential-positive cases who are high risk for inducible sustained VT.

Risk Factors for Tachycardia Events Caused by Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Experience From the ESVEM Trial

BACKGROUND: In the Electrophysiology Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial, up to seven antiarrhythmic drugs were randomly assigned to 486 patients with a history of sustained ventricular arrhythmia. At baseline, all the patients had inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and had >/=10 premature ventricular beats (PVBs) per hour on 48-hour Holter monitoring. A total of 1,229 drug trials were performed. Antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued during hospitalization because of ventricular tachyarrhythmias thought to be a proarrhythmic effect of the antiarrhythmic drugs in 96 of 479 patients (20%) who received drugs. Proarrhythmic effects were defined as sustained VT, ventricular fibrillation or arrhythmic death, torsade de pointes, or distinct intolerable worsening of the baseline arrhythmia after at least three doses of the drug. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighteen baseline characteristics were analyzed for factors that would predict a higher incidence of proarrhythmia. These included type of heart disease, previous myocardial infarction, symptom activity scale, gender, type of arrhythmia, VT/ventricular fibrillation, age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), PVB frequency, heart rate, QRS duration, and QT interval. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified increased mean PVB frequency (P =.003) and increased heart rate (P =.026) as significant predictors of proarrhythmia. Decreased LVEF (<25%) exhibited only a trend toward significance (P =.073). When proarrhythmia was redefined as sustained VT, cardiac arrest of arrhythmic death, or torsade de pointes (n = 59), PVB frequency (P =.003) and heart rate (P =.034) were still the only significant baseline predictors. CONCLUSIONS: In the ESVEM study, higher PVB frequency and higher heart rate were significant predictors of drug-induced proarrhythmia.

A decade of clinical trial developments in postmyocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia patients: from CAST to AVID and beyond. Cardiac Arrhythmic Suppression Trial. Antiarrhythmic Versus Implantable Defibrillators

Multiple trials using antiarrhythmic drugs, pharmacologic therapy, and implantable cardioverter defibrillators have been performed in an attempt to improve survival in patients: (1) postmyocardial infarction; (2) with congestive heart failure, with and without nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; and (3) with sustained ventricular tachycardia and those who have survived an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This article reviews some of the key findings and limitations of completed and ongoing trials. We also make recommendations for the current treatment of such patients based on the results of these trials.

Evolution and revolution in drug labeling: regulation of antiarrhythmic drugs by the Food and Drug Administration 1962-1996

Between 1962, when the Kefauver-Harris Drug Amendments were passed, and 1996, 20 pharmaceutical compounds were approved and labeled by the FDA as effective antiarrhythmic drugs for some specified cardiac arrhythmia. Drug research and development in the 1970s and 1980s were focused on treatment of premature ventricular beats as a marker for sudden cardiac death and ventricular tachycardia. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial in 1989 irrevocably altered this approach. Recent drug development programs have targeted atrial fibrillation (AF) as epidemiologic data have predicted an increase in the incidence of AF as the United States population ages, and as treating premature ventricular beats has fallen from favor. The FDA, the scientific community, and the pharmaceutical industry have all participated in and been affected by this evolution in drug development.

[Current indications for implantable automatic defibrillators]

Since the first implantation in man in 1980 implantable cardioverter defibrillator technology has greatly improved and the number of devices implanted has increased considerably in recent years. Non-thoracotomy lead systems and biphasic shocks are now the approach of choice, offering nearly a 100% success rate. This paper version reviews the current indications for the implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and is an upgraded of an article previously published by the Arrhythmia's Section of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. Recommendations for qualification of centres implanting defibrillators and follow up are also addressed.

Telemetry-documented, pace-terminable ventricular tachycardia in patients with ventricular fibrillation

The follow-up prevalence of electrogram-confirmed spontaneous ventricular tachycardia with a cycle length of >280 ms (53%) exceeds the prevalence of ventricular fibrillation (23%) in patients whose only spontaneous arrhythmia before implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation was ventricular fibrillation. Antitachycardia pacing therapy safely terminates most (89%) of these slower ventricular tachycardia episodes, recommending the use of tiered-therapy devices and anticipatory activation of ventricular tachycardia detection and treatment algorithms for ventricular fibrillation patients who receive an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Procainamide induced change of the width of the zone of entrainment and its relation to the inducibility of reentrant ventricular tachycardia

Procainamide depresses conduction velocity and prolongs refractoriness in myocardium responsible for reentrant VT, but the mechanism by which the induction of VT is suppressed after procainamide administration remains to be determined. In the present study, the relationship between electrophysiological parameters and the noninducibility of VT was assessed during procainamide therapy with a special reference to the change of an excitable gap. Clinically documented monomorphic sustained VT was induced in 30 patients and, utilizing the phenomenon of transient entrainment, the zone of entrainment was measured as the difference between the cycle length of VT and the longest paced cycle length interrupting VT (block cycle length) which was determined as the paced cycle length decreased in steps of 10 ms, and used as an index of the excitable gap. The effective refractory period was measured at the pacing site and the paced QRS duration was used as an index of the global conduction time in the ventricle. The cycle length of VT, the block cycle length, and the width of the zone of entrainment were determined and compared between the responders and nonresponders. In 15 patients, these parameters were determined at the intermediate dose and related to subsequent noninducibility at the final dose. At the final doses of procainamide, VT was suppressed in 8 (26.7%) of 30 patients. However, the cycle length of VT, the block cycle length, and the width of the zone of entrainment were unable to predict the drug efficacy, i.e., noninducibility. The change in the effective refractory period at the pacing site or the width of the paced QRS duration was not different between the responders and nonresponders. Among the variables, only the width of the zone of entrainment showed a significant narrowing in the responders at the intermediate dose of procainamide, and it was smaller than that of the nonresponders. The significant narrowing of the width of the zone of entrainment was associated with the subsequent noninducibility of VT at the final dose. The present study showed that the baseline cycle length of VT, the block cycle length, the drug induced change of the effective refractory period, or the paced QRS duration was not a predictor of the noninducibility after procainamide administration. However, a significant narrowing of the width of the zone of entrainment at the intermediate dose was associated with the noninducibility of VT at the final dose.

Definition of predicted effective antiarrhythmic drug therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias by the electrophysiologic study approach: randomized comparison of patient response criteria

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare efficacies of therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias selected by programmed stimulation using two different patient response efficacy criteria: <5 versus <16 repetitive ventricular responses.

BACKGROUND

Therapy selection for ventricular tachyarrhythmias by programmed stimulation requires definition of a patient response that predicts long-term efficacy. Such definitions have not been previously compared prospectively.

METHODS

Patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias were randomized to therapy selection using either the <5 or <16 repetitive response criterion of predicted effective therapy. The primary end point was sudden death or recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia requiring intervention.

RESULTS

Predicted effective drug therapy was found for 23 (34%) of 68 patients randomized to the <5 criterion and 29 (36%) of 81 patients randomized to the <16 criterion (p = NS). Definition of therapy required 3.0 +/- 1.6 drug trials (mean +/- SD) in patients randomized to the <5 criterion and 2.9 +/- 1.8 trials in patients randomized to the <16 criterion (p = NS). Patients randomized to the <5 criterion had a lower 2-year probability of the primary end point (0.20 +/- 0.05) than did patients randomized to the <16 criterion (0.33 +/- 0.05, one-tailed p = 0.004). The advantage of the <5 criterion was also seen in subgroup analyses involving patients with and without an initial drug efficacy prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

The programmed stimulation approach to the selection of antiarrhythmic therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias using a patient response criterion of <5 repetitive ventricular responses results in a lower probability of recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia than does use of a <16 repetitive response criterion.

General principles of antiarrhythmic therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmias is a significant cause of mortality in patients with structural heart disease. Over the past several decades, the introduction of new pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapy has expanded the treatment options available. This article will focus on the use of antiarrhythmic medication for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias and will review the following: (1) treatment goals for various clinical populations, (2) the mechanisms of antiarrhythmic and proarrhythmic actions of antiarrhythmic medications, and (3) empiric versus guided pharmacologic therapy.

Management of patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the defibrillator era: the need to differentiate

Patients with a history of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias form an extremely inhomogeneous group with respect to presenting arrhythmia, underlying cardiac disease, and therefore, risk of dying suddenly. For subgroups such as ventricular tachycardia in the absence of underlying cardiac disease, radiofrequency catheter ablation offers cure. In others, implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator already appears to have gained the therapy of first choice, leaving only a secondary role to antiarrhythmic drugs. It must be emphasized however, that these new therapeutic strategies have their pros and cons like the older, seemingly out-fashioned approaches of noninvasively or invasively guided antiarrhythmic drug therapy or empiric amiodarone treatment. Until the advent of controlled randomized trials comparing the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) with the best other, usually medical form of treatment, physicians must continue to base their individual therapeutic decisions on circumstantial published and personal experience. In doing so, the recent achievements of catheter ablation and defibrillator implantation have definitely improved patient care, but have not made antiarrhythmic drugs jobless. With all the alternatives at hand, it remains a challenging task to weigh the benefits and risks of the various approaches against each other in an attempt to tailor the antiarrhythmic intervention to the very individual need of the patient.

Evaluation and treatment strategies in patients at high risk of sudden death post myocardial infarction

Over 50 percent of deaths in patients who survive an acute myocardial infarction are due to fatal ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Patients who survive an episode of sustained ventricular arrhythmia are at highest risk of recurrent cardiac arrest. Electrophysiologic studies have been found to be useful in guiding therapy and reducing mortality in these patients and in patients with syncope due to arrhythmic etiology. Evaluation and treatment of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia post infarction remains somewhat controversial. A recently published trial (MADIT), however, showed improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease and asymptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Asymptomatic patients post infarction at high risk include those who have significant left ventricular dysfunction, late potentials, high-grade ventricular ectopy, and abnormal heart rate variability. These tests individually, however, have a low positive predictive accuracy. This, combined with the fact that antiarrhythmic drugs are frequently not effective and can be proarrhythmic, leaves the best treatment for these patients uncertain. It is known, however, that beta-adrenoreceptor blocking agents do reduce mortality after an acute myocardial infarction. Early studies have shown mixed results relating to sudden death and total mortality with amiodarone. To date, no other antiarrhythmic drug has shown benefit, while several have been shown to be harmful. Recent studies have also shown some beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, carvedilol, a third-generation beta-blocking agent with vasodilator properties, and the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan. However, their precise role in reducing sudden death needs to be defined further.

Cardiac electrophysiology studies and ablation procedures: a literature review

This literature review is focused on issues related to the development and usefulness of cardiac electrophysiology studies and ablation procedures. During the past decade, the efficacy of these developments has been proven. The resultant emergence of specialists trained as electrophysiologists represents an important milestone in the advancement of cardiology departments internationally. The majority of research papers on the subject have been published within the past 5 years. Most of the research has evolved from North America and Britain. On searching the literature, it was found that many gaps remain. There is a striking dearth of documented data regarding electrophysiology studies and ablation therapy within the Irish medical and nursing literature, and no previous literature review on the topic was found in a wider search. This paper provides an overview of the strengths and weaknesses associated with these procedures.

The ESVEM trial: impact on treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring

The ESVEM (Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring) trial was a prospective, randomized study, initiated in 1983, to compare the outcome of patients in whom antiarrhythmic therapy was guided by serial electrophysiological study with the outcome of patients in whom therapy was guided by electrocardiographic monitoring. In a surprising finding, there was no difference in rates of arrhythmia recurrence or mortality between the two methods. Subsequent reanalyses using more stringent criteria for both methods or a combined assessment have not significantly improved the predictive accuracy of guided therapy. Because drug therapy in each limb was also randomized, a comparison of specific antiarrhythmic agents was also possible: sotalol therapy and the absence of previous antiarrhythmic drug therapy were associated with a reduction in arrhythmia recurrence. Survey data suggest that the results of this trial have influenced clinical practice.

Long-term cost-effectiveness of alternative management strategies for patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) Investigators

BACKGROUND

Serial antiarrhythmic drug testing guided by Holter monitoring and electrophysiologic study had similar clinical outcomes in the Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial, while patients treated with sotalol had improved outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare long-term cost-effectiveness of these management alternatives.

METHODS

Patients in the ESVEM trial were linked to computerized files of either the Health Care Finance Administration or the Department of Veterans Affairs. Total hospital costs and survival time over five year follow-up were measured using actuarial methods, and cost-effectiveness was calculated.

RESULTS

Patients randomized to therapy guided by electrophysiologic study had more hospital admissions, higher costs, and a cost-effectiveness ratio of $162,500 per life year added compared with therapy guided by Holter monitoring. Patients randomized to sotalol had fewer hospitalizations, lower costs, and better survival than patients randomized to other drugs, and sotalol was a dominant strategy in the cost-effectiveness analysis. Patients for whom an effective drug was found had fewer hospital admissions, lower costs, and longer survival. These findings were robust in sensitivity analyses and in bootstrap replications.

CONCLUSIONS

Serial drug testing guided by electrophysiologic study had an unfavorable cost-effectiveness ratio relative to Holter monitoring, while sotalol was cost-effective relative to other antiarrhythmic drugs.

Drugs or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with poor left ventricular function?

Poor left ventricular function is a predictor of sudden death. Both antiarrhythmic drugs and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) promise to reduce the sudden death rate in these patients and consequently improve survival. In patients without spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias, only beta-blocking agents and amiodarone have been shown to reduce sudden death and improve survival in some studies, whereas class I antiarrhythmic drugs increased mortality. For patients with documented ventricular tachyarrhythmias, protection against sudden death by serially tested class I antiarrhythmic drugs is at best moderate. There is some evidence suggesting that therapy with class III antiarrhythmic drugs, either amiodarone or dl-sotalol, may reduce sudden death rates and improve overall mortality in comparison to therapy with class I antiarrhythmic drugs. ICDs have been shown to prevent sudden death reliably. In published patient cohorts in which only patients who were not inducible off antiarrhythmic drugs or still inducible on antiarrhythmic drugs received an ICD, the ICD seemed to improve overall survival in comparison to class I antiarrhythmic drugs. A small prospective randomized study that compared a conventional therapy strategy to primary ICD implantations showed an improved outcome with ICDs as therapy of first choice. However, these studies included many patients treated with class I antiarrhythmic drugs considered to be less effective. In matched control studies comparing the ICD to amiodarone or dl-sotalol, less sudden deaths and an improved overall survival could be shown for the ICD in general without stratification for left ventricular function. Thus, in patients with hemodynamically nontolerated ventricular tachyarrhythmias, the ICD seems to improve survival in comparison to class I antiarrhythmic drugs, dl-sotalol, or amiodarone. However, in patients with poor left ventricular function, therapy with ICDs seems to be less cost-effective than in patients with preserved left ventricular function. In patients with very poor left ventricular function who are evaluated for cardiac transplantation, the ICD seems to change only the mode of death from sudden to a nonsudden cardiac death if transplantation cannot be performed soon.

Implications of the Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring trial for controlling ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation

The Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial had 2 objectives. The first was to determine the accuracy of noninvasive versus invasive means of predicting the efficacy of drug treatment for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF). A second objective was to determine the relative efficacies of 7 antiarrhythmic drugs used in the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. ESVEM was the first opportunity to compare prospectively the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a variety of antiarrhythmic drugs in the same patient population. No significant difference was observed between suppression of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias on Holter monitoring and suppression of inducible ventricular arrhythmias by electrophysiologic study (EPS) in terms of the ability to predict the success of drug therapy. There was also no difference in predictive accuracy if patients in the electrophysiologic limb showed suppression by Holter monitoring in addition to suppression by EPS. Sotalol was more effective than the other 6 antiarrhythmic drugs, all class I agents, in preventing death and recurrence of arrhythmia. Efficacy compared with placebo, however, was not evaluated. In the EPS limb, sotalol was also statistically more likely to achieve an efficacy prediction than any of the sodium channel blocking drugs. Amiodarone was not used in ESVEM. It has been suggested that these conclusions, which differ from those of other, less controlled, invasive and noninvasive studies, might be because of the particular efficacy criteria used in the ESVEM protocol. Retrospective analyses of the ESVEM data were performed using more rigid efficacy criteria than were used in the original ESVEM analysis: a greater degree of ectopy suppression was required for Holter monitoring, and more stringent efficacy definitions were required in the stimulation protocol of the EPS limb. Results from the retrospective analyses and other studies support the initial ESVEM conclusions. In patients with both spontaneous and inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias as well as frequent spontaneous premature ventricular contractions, therapy with sotalol (guided by either Holter monitoring or EPS) is a reasonable initial strategy because of its superior initial long-term efficacy and better acute and long-term tolerability compared with sodium channel blocking drugs.

Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM): a critical appraisal

This paper reviews the Electrophysiologic Study versus Holter Monitoring (ESVEM) trial, addressing several areas of concern including potential enrollment bias, an inadequate electrophysiologic testing protocol during drug therapy, and an unexpectedly high recurrence rate in patients deemed to be controlled by either method. The paper concludes that there are insufficient data to warrant extrapolation of the ESVEM results to survivors of cardiac arrest.

A summary and assessment of the findings and conclusions of the ESVEM trial

The Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial was completed in 1992 and the primary results were reported in 1993. Since then, considerable discussion about this trial has taken place and new trial results have been reported. Trial analysis has yielded seven principal findings to date concerning treatment of patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, ie: (1) similar accuracy of electrophysiologic study (EPS), Holter monitoring (HM), and EPS combined with HM for predicting antiarrhythmic drug efficacy; (2) greater efficiency and lower cost of HM; (3) improved survival associated with predicted drug efficacy; (4) predictors of response to EPS and HM; (5) greater efficacy and lower cost of therapy with sotalol compared with drugs with class-l effects; (6) lack of a relationship between presenting and recurring arrhythmia; and (7) preponderance of nonarrhythmic deaths in trial participants. A number of additional specific findings of the trial are reviewed in this symposium. Several criticisms of the trial's enrollment, methods, and efficacy criteria are reviewed and discussed. Some criticisms are valid. Many are related to misunderstandings of ESVEM trial methodology and to bias of the individual critics. Some are simply incorrect. The importance of the ESVEM trial in the present day may be limited by the growing use of implanted devices rather than drugs for treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. If clinical trials ultimately prove devices to be no more effective than drugs, the findings of the ESVEM investigators will grow in importance.

A randomized clinical trial of the noninvasive and invasive approaches to drug therapy for ventricular tachycardia: long-term follow-up of the Calgary trial

Individualized antiarrhythmic drug therapy for patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias may be selected by the noninvasive approach (suppression of spontaneous ventricular premature beats) or the invasive approach (suppression of ventricular tachyarrhythmias induced at an electrophysiologic study). There is controversy over which approach is superior. From a screened population of 124 patients with symptomatic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, 57 patients with both frequent ventricular premature beats and inducible ventricular tachycardia at baseline were randomized to have chronic therapy selected by either the noninvasive or invasive approach. These patients have now been followed up for a minimum event-free period of 6.5 years. By intention-to-treat, therapy selected by the invasive approach prevented subsequent ventricular tachyarrhythmias better than that selected by the noninvasive approach (6-year probabilities of freedom from symptomatic sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrence; noninvasive approach, 0.45 +/- 0.10; invasive approach, 0.73 +/- 0.09; p=.02). This advantage of the invasive approach was also evident for the outcome of any ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrence and for efficacy analyses involving only those patients with a drug-efficacy prediction. We hypothesize that the difference between these results and those of the ESVEM trial are caused, in part, by differences in the characteristics of the enrolled patients and differences in criteria used to define a predicted-effective therapy.

Is a baseline electrophysiologic study mandatory for the management of patients with spontaneous, sustained, ventricular tachyarrhythmias?

Should the patient being treated for spontaneous, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) routinely undergo a baseline, diagnostic, catheter electrophysiologic (EP) study? The potential patient advantages of such a policy include identification of the tachyarrhythmia-initiating episodes of presumed VT or VF, prediction of the subsequent risk of VT/VF recurrences, identification of VT mechanisms amenable to cure by catheter ablation, assessment of the response of a patient's VT to attempts at pace termination, evaluation of the patient's candidacy for some of the approaches to VT/VF therapy selection, and enhancement of our understanding of the mechanisms and therapeutics of VT/VF. Disadvantages of such a policy include patient discomfort, patient risks, and cost. Recognizing that the decision to perform a baseline catheter EP study in a patient with VT/VF must be based on an individualized, patient-based, risk-benefit analysis; this review details each of the advantages and disadvantages of doing so to identify patient populations for whom a baseline catheter EP study is or is not usually indicated.

Influence of Holter monitor and electrophysiologic study methods and efficacy criteria on the outcome of patients with ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in the ESVEM trial

Because not all laboratories use the monitoring and stimulation protocols used in the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial, we reanalyzed the ESVEM patients' data using alternative, commonly used Holter monitor (HM) and programmed stimulation efficacy criteria to determine if different criteria would have changed the trial's conclusions. Also, because beta-blocker use and coronary artery disease frequency were not equally distributed between the two limbs in ESVEM, we reanalyzed the ESVEM data adjusting for the possible effect of these variables. In the HM limb, drug efficacy in the original ESVEM analysis was declared by reduction of total premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) by 70%, pairs by 80%, runs of 3 to 15 beats by 90%, and all ventricular tachycardia (VT) more than 15 beats by 100%. In this analysis, we examine outcome in subjects meeting two more stringent sets of criteria, (1) reduction of total PVCs by 70%, of pairs by 80%, and of all VT by 100% (new criteria set 1) and (2) reduction of total PVCs by 80%, of pairs by 90%, and of all VT by 100% (new criteria set 2). In electrophysiology (EPS) limb patients, we compared arrhythmia recurrence when efficacy was declared with triple extrastimuli as compared with maximally testing with double extrastimuli, and arrhythmia recurrence was compared in patients tested with identical versus any more aggressive protocol on drug than was used before drug. We also compared the predictive accuracy of zero versus 3 to 15, and 0 to 5, 6 to 10, and more than 10 induced beats on drug. Additionally, we compared predictive accuracy of the HM- and EP-guided limbs excluding patients on beta blockers and those with noncoronary disease. Lastly, to determine whether concordant results on HM and EPS testing would provide more accurate efficacy predictions than EP testing alone, HM recordings obtained in EPS-limb patients but not processed or used during the course of the EVSEM study were analyzed. The original ESVEM HM criteria, new set 1, and new set 2 yielded predicted drug efficacy rates of 77%, 68%, and 58%, respectively; however, arrhythmia recurrence rates were unchanged. Similarly, arrhythmia recurrence rates for patients tested with triple versus less than triple extrastimuli (p=.238), more aggressive versus identical protocols (p=.955), and 0 to 5 v 6 to 10 v more than 10 induced beats (p=.263) or 0 v 3 to 15 induced beats (p=.106) were unchanged. in the 215 (of 286) patients with coronary disease and not receiving beta blockers, there was still no difference in arrhythmia recurrence or mortality between the noninvasive and invasive limbs in ESVEM. Lastly, in patients with drug efficacy predictions by EPS testing, there was no difference in outcome in patients who had concordant versus discordant efficacy prediction by simultaneously obtained HMs. The use of more stringent testing methods and efficacy criteria would not have significantly improved the predictive accuracy of drug assessment by HM or EPS in the ESVEM trial. Additionally, excess noncoronary disease in EP-guided patients and excess beta-blocker used in HM-guided patients did not influence the results in the ESVEM trial.

QRS morphologies of the surface ECG of nonsustained ventricular tachycardias during holter monitoring compared with QRS morphologies of spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardias

The purpose of this study was to compare electrocardiographic (ECG) morphologies of nonsustained ventricular tachycardias (VTs) during Holter monitoring with the ECG morphology of documented, sustained, monomorphic VTs during the spontaneous event of tachycardia in 14 patients (9 with coronary artery disease), in whom a sustained, spontaneous monomorphic VT had been documented in a 12-lead ECG. All patients had a 24-hour Holter ECG without antiarrhythmic medication. Channel 1 of the Holter ECG was compared with leads V1, V2, and V3, and channel 2 with leads V4, V5, and V6. The Holter ECG of 10 patients in whom the QRS complex during sinus rhythm was similar to the QRS complex in the corresponding ECG leads was accepted for analysis. In 8 of the 10 patients, nonsustained VTs were detected during Holter monitoring. In one of these eight, the ECG morphology of at least one nonsustained VT in the Holter recordings was identical with the sustained VTs. Thus, incidences and ECG morphologies of nonsustained VTs during Holter monitoring do not correlate closely with those of spontaneous sustained monomorphic VTs. Therefore, most ventricular runs during Holter monitoring may have a mechanism different from that of spontaneous sustained VTs.

Data-driven Decisions: The Importance of Clinical Trials in Arrhythmia Management

As a result of clinical trials, the measurement of arrhythmias has evolved over the past three decades. In the late 1960s, customary teaching was that ventricular premature depolarizations were dangerous and antiarrhythmic therapy, in hopes of reducing fatal consequences, became common place; however, following clinical trials such as CAST, IMPACT, and SWORD, we learned that, at least in postinfarct patients, arrhythmia suppression may lead to increased rather than reduced mortality. Such trials have led to a marked reduction in therapy of indiscriminate ventricular ectopy and have led to ongoing testing of specific subgroups identified as having particularly higher adverse prognostic risk. With the advent of cardiac monitoring and the confirmation that ventricular tachyarrhythmias are the most common cause for sudden death, their therapy, too, has evolved and matured, again aided by clinical trials. The ESVEM study prospectively examined the role of monitor-guided versus electrophysiologically guided drug therapy of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and confirmed that both approaches may have a role in reducing arrhythmic deaths-though the specific benefits of each technique remain somewhat unsettled. Both the ESVEM and CASCADE studies suggested that the most effective drugs for ventricular tachyarrhythmias are the class II/III drugs, sotalol and amiodarone, both appearing more effective than our older class I agents. These should now be viewed as the first-line drugs for these arrhythmias. The relative benefits of these two agents with respect to each other and to implantable cardioverter defibrillators, however, remains to be determined by further clinical trials, such as AVID and CIDS. The therapy of atrial tachyarrhythmias has similarly evolved with the aid of clinical observations. While rate control is required in all patients with atrial fibrillation, we have come to realize that the applications of antiarrhythmic drugs for the purpose of maintaining sinus rhythm must be used only selectively rather than uniformly. Both a meta-analysis by Coplen and colleagues and a report by the SPAF investigators suggested that with atrial arrhythmias, too, antiarrhythmic drug therapy may result in enhanced rather than reduced mortality in some circumstances. Additional clinical trials are needed to further elucidate the role of antiarrhythmic therapy of atrial fibrillation.

Antiarrhythmic activity of quinine in humans

BACKGROUND

Quinine is the diastereomer of quinidine. In dogs, it has similar effects on conduction time but does not prolong epicardial repolarization time or ventricular refractoriness. It has antiarrhythmic effects in both cats and dogs. We assessed the antiarrhythmic potential of quinine in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias in humans.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients underwent open-label, dose-ranging trials of quinine with daily doses of 600, 1200, and 1800 mg in a twice-daily dosing regimen. In 17 patients with frequent spontaneous ventricular ectopy, oral quinine suppressed arrhythmia in 11 of 12 patients who finished the study and was not tolerated by 4 patients, and 1 patient withdrew from the study. The mean effective daily dosage was 927 mg, the mean effective trough serum level was 11 mumol/L (range, 4 to 17 mumol/L), and the half-life was 20 +/- 7 hours. In a second open-label, dose-ranging trial in 10 patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia and reduced left ventricular systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction, 35 +/- 16%), quinine suppressed inducibility of ventricular tachycardia in 3 of 10 patients. At a basic pacing cycle length of 500 milliseconds, ventricular effective refractory period was prolonged (279 +/- 21 versus 247 +/- 10 milliseconds, quinine versus drug free, P = .003). In the remaining patients, ventricular tachycardia cycle length was prolonged (373 +/- 48 versus 253 +/- 30 milliseconds, quinine versus drug free, P < .001). The corrected QT interval was not prolonged.

CONCLUSIONS

Quinine is an effective and convenient antiarrhythmic drug for the suppression of ventricular arrhythmias in humans.

Spatial features in body-surface potential maps can identify patients with a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Regional disparities of ventricular primary-repolarization properties contribute to an electrophysiological substrate for arrhythmias. Such disparities can be assessed from body-surface distributions of ECG QRST areas. Our objective was to isolate and test those features of QRST-area distributions that would be suitable for identifying patients at risk for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We recorded ECGs simultaneously from 120 leads during sinus rhythm for 204 patients taking no antiarrhythmic drugs: half had had sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT); the other half, a myocardial infarction but no history of VT. For each patient, we calculated the QRST area in each lead and, using Karhunen-Loeve (K-L) expansion, reduced these data to 16 coefficients (each relating to one spatial feature, an eigenvector, derived from the total set of 204 QRST-area maps). Using stepwise discriminant analysis, we selected feature subsets that best discriminated between the two groups, and we estimated by a bootstrap procedure using 1000 trials how these subsets would perform on a prospective patient population. The mean diagnostic performance of the classifier for 1000 randomly selected training sets (n = 102 in each, with both groups equally represented) increased monotonically with the number of features used for classification. The initial trend for the corresponding test sets (n = 102 in each) was the same but reversed when the number of features exceeded eight. For an optimal set of eight spatial features, the sensitivity and specificity of the classifier for detecting patients with VT in 1000 test sets were (mean +/- SD) 90.3 +/- 4.3% and 78.0 +/- 6.1%, and its positive and negative predictive accuracies were 80.7 +/- 4.2% and 89.2 +/- 4.2%, respectively. Use of QRS duration as a supplementary feature to eight K-L coefficients can, in the test sets, increase specificity to 80.9 +/- 5.4% and positive predictive accuracy to 82.8 +/- 3.9% compared with the results for the optimal number of eight K-L features alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple body-surface ECGs contain valuable spatial features that can identify the presence of an arrhythmogenic substrate in the myocardium of patients at risk for ventricular arrhythmias. Our results compare very favorably with those achieved by any other known test, invasive or noninvasive, for arrhythmogenicity.

Current approaches in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias

The article has summarized the studies and ongoing trials looking at the significance and treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In most instances, the presence of these arrhythmias is associated with an increased risk of future arrhythmic events. Electrophysiologic studies are helpful in risk stratification in patients with coronary artery disease but can be misleading in the setting of dilated cardiomyopathy and often produce nonspecific results in patients with HCM. The need for an invasive electrophysiologic study is crucial in the diagnosis of certain ventricular arrhythmias that are amenable to cure with radiofrequency catheter ablation, such as idiopathic ventricular tachycardia and BBR-VT. The correct approach for patients with SVT not amenable to catheter ablation remains to be determined. In deciding whether to use a device or drug therapy, however, one should take into consideration the degree of left ventricular dysfunction and the overall health status of the patient. For example, device implantation clearly reduces sudden death in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction but may not change total mortality because these same patients may die of congestive heart failure. Device therapy might be more cost-effective for patients with less severe depression of left ventricular function.

Spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia in the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) Trial

OBJECTIVES

We compared the QRS waveforms of the initial and subsequent complexes of spontaneous sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia and the rhythm induced at electrophysiologic study to test the theory that premature ventricular complexes "trigger" spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and that a stable substrate exists such that the spontaneous arrhythmia can be reproduced at electrophysiologic study.

BACKGROUND

Failure rates have been high in several recent studies in which prevention of ventricular tachyarrhythmias was guided by suppression of premature ventricular complexes or induced ventricular tachycardias.

METHODS

Digital waveform analysis was used to distinguish events of ventricular tachycardia initiated by configurationally distinct, possibly triggering, complexes (type 1) from events in which the initial QRS waveforms were identical to subsequent complexes, suggesting no requirement for premature ventricular beats (type 2).

RESULTS

Of 1,102 episodes of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia, 73 (6.6%) were type 1; 1,012 were type 2 (91.8%); and 17 (1.5%) were uncertain. Of 59 patients only 14 (24%) had only type 1 episodes (group 1), whereas 37 patients (63%) had predominantly type 2 events (group 2) (p < 0.0001). Sustained ventricular tachycardia was inducible in all group 1 patients, and in most (57%) the induced rhythm was similar to the spontaneous rhythm. Ventricular tachycardia could not be induced in 7 patients from group 2 (19%), and in 18 patients (49%) the induced and spontaneous rhythms were dissimilar. Recurrence of arrhythmia rates differed according to the guidance method in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies between observed and predicted modes of initiation of ventricular tachycardia and between spontaneous and induced rhythms could result in inappropriate guidance and subsequent failure of antiarrhythmic treatment.

Cardiac arrhythmia therapy

Cardiac dysfunction is often manifested as arrhythmia, with disruption of the normal periodicity and regularity of electromechanical activity. The therapy for arrhythmia begins with proper diagnosis, since many pharmacological interventions are themselves arrhythmogenic. Intervention for acute arrhythmia involves correction of underlying systemic conditions by ensuring adequate oxygenation, ventilation, acid-base homeostasis, electrolyte balance, and fluid status. Classification of antiarrhythmic agents assists in a structured treatment approach that utilizes different agents based on the etiology of the arrhythmia and the drug's mechanism of action. A deliberate treatment strategy guided by the morphological criteria of the arrhythmia modified by the rate and duration of complexes, noting symptoms and hemodynamic stability, is desirable.

Significance and incidence of concordance of drug efficacy predictions by Holter monitoring and electrophysiological study in the ESVEM Trial. Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring

BACKGROUND

Selection of antiarrhythmic therapy may be based on either suppression of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias assessed by Holter monitoring or by suppression of inducible ventricular arrhythmias during electrophysiological study. This study examines the frequency and significance of concordance of these two approaches in the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-four-hour Holter monitoring was performed in patients randomized to the electrophysiology limb of the ESVEM study at the time of the first drug trial and at the time of an effective drug trial. Holter monitors were available in 65% (146/226) of patients at the time of the first drug trial and in 93% (100/108) of patients at the time of an electrophysiology study predicting drug efficacy. There were no clinical differences between patients who had and those who did not have a Holter monitor. At the time of the first drug trial, concordance of Holter and electrophysiological predictions of drug efficacy was observed in 46% of patients (both techniques predicted efficacy in 23%; neither predicted efficacy in 23%). Discordant results were observed in 54% (Holter suppression without electrophysiological suppression in 44%; electrophysiological suppression without Holter suppression in 10%). At the time of an electrophysiology study predicting drug efficacy, 68 of the 100 patients without inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias also had suppression of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias on the Holter recorded at the time of the electrophysiological study. Neither arrhythmia recurrence nor mortality was significantly different in patients with suppression of both inducible and spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias compared with those with only suppression of inducible arrhythmias. Comparison of patients with suppression of both inducible and spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias with the 188 patients in the Holter limb, in whom efficacy was predicted by Holter monitoring only, revealed no difference in outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population, (1) there is frequent discordance in prediction of drug efficacy and inefficacy between electrophysiological study and Holter monitoring; (2) a requirement to fulfill both Holter and electrophysiological efficacy criteria reduces the number of patients with an efficacy prediction; and (3) suppression of both spontaneous ventricular ectopy and inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias does not identify a group with better outcome.