Drug therapy of migraine

Neuroanatomical evidence and a mouse calcitonin gene-related peptide model in line with human functional magnetic resonance imaging data support the involvement of peptidergic Edinger-Westphal nucleus in migraine

ABSTRACT

The urocortin 1 (UCN1)-expressing centrally projecting Edinger-Westphal (EWcp) nucleus is influenced by circadian rhythms, hormones, stress, and pain, all known migraine triggers. Our study investigated EWcp's potential involvement in migraine. Using RNAscope in situ hybridization and immunostaining, we examined the expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor components in both mouse and human EWcp and dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN). Tracing study examined connection between EWcp and the spinal trigeminal nucleus (STN). The intraperitoneal CGRP injection model of migraine was applied and validated by light-dark box, and von Frey assays in mice, in situ hybridization combined with immunostaining, were used to assess the functional-morphological changes. The functional connectivity matrix of EW was examined using functional magnetic resonance imaging in control humans and interictal migraineurs. We proved the expression of CGRP receptor components in both murine and human DRN and EWcp. We identified a direct urocortinergic projection from EWcp to the STN. Photophobic behavior, periorbital hyperalgesia, increased c-fos gene-encoded protein immunoreactivity in the lateral periaqueductal gray matter and trigeminal ganglia, and phosphorylated c-AMP-responsive element binding protein in the STN supported the efficacy of CGRP-induced migraine-like state. Calcitonin gene-related peptide administration also increased c-fos gene-encoded protein expression, Ucn1 mRNA, and peptide content in EWcp/UCN1 neurons while reducing serotonin and tryptophan hydroxylase-2 levels in the DRN. Targeted ablation of EWcp/UCN1 neurons induced hyperalgesia. A positive functional connectivity between EW and STN as well as DRN has been identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. The presented data strongly suggest the regulatory role of EWcp/UCN1 neurons in migraine through the STN and DRN with high translational value.

Non-CGRP Antagonist/Non-Triptan Options for Migraine Disease Treatment: Clinical Considerations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although the association between CGRP and migraine disease is well-known and studied, therapies can target other pathways to minimize migraine symptoms. It is important to understand the role of these medications as options for migraine treatment and the varied mechanisms by which symptoms can be addressed. In the present investigation, the role of non-CGRP antagonist/non-triptan options for migraine disease therapy is reviewed, including NSAIDs, ß-blockers, calcium channel blockers, antidepressants, and antiepileptics. Pharmacologic therapies for both acute symptoms and prophylaxis are evaluated, and their adverse effects are compared.

RECENT FINDINGS

At present, the Food and Drug Association has approved the beta-blockers propranolol and timolol and the anti-epileptic drugs topiramate and divalproex sodium for migraine prevention. Clinicians have other options for evidence-based treatment of episodic migraine attacks. Treatment decisions should consider contraindications, the effectiveness of alternatives, and potential side effects. NSAIDs are effective for the acute treatment of migraine exacerbations with caution for adverse effects such as gastrointestinal upset and renal symptoms. Beta-blockers are effective for migraine attack prophylaxis but are associated with dizziness and fatigue and are contraindicated in patients with certain co-morbidities, including asthma, congestive heart failure, and abnormal cardiac rhythms. Calcium channel blockers do not show enough evidence to be recommended as migraine attack prophylactic therapy. The anti-epileptic drugs topiramate and divalproex sodium and antidepressants venlafaxine and amitriptyline are effective for migraine exacerbation prophylaxis but have associated side effects. The decision for pharmacologic management should ultimately be made following consideration of risk vs. benefit and discussion between patient and physician.

Neuropeptides and Neurotransmitters That Modulate Thalamo-Cortical Pathways Relevant to Migraine Headache

Dynamic thalamic regulation of sensory signals allows the cortex to adjust better to rapidly changing behavioral, physiological, and environmental demands. To fulfill this role, thalamic neurons must themselves be subjected to constantly changing modulatory inputs that originate in multiple neurochemical pathways involved in autonomic, affective, and cognitive functions. This review defines a chemical framework for thinking about the complexity of factors that modulate the response properties of relay trigeminovascular thalamic neurons. Following the presentation of scientific evidence for monosynaptic connections between thalamic trigeminovascular neurons and axons containing glutamate, GABA, dopamine, noradrenaline, serotonin, histamine, orexin, and melanin-concentrating hormone, this review synthesizes a large body of data to propose that the transmission of headache-related nociceptive signals from the thalamus to the cortex is modulated by potentially opposing forces and that the so-called 'decision' of which system (neuropeptide/neurotransmitter) will dominate the firing of a trigeminovascular thalamic neuron at any given time is determined by the constantly changing physiological (sleep, wakefulness, food intake, body temperature, heart rate, blood pressure), behavioral (addiction, isolation), cognitive (attention, learning, memory use), and affective (stress, anxiety, depression, anger) adjustment needed to keep homeostasis.

Migraine Headache Treated with Famciclovir and Celecoxib: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) has been speculated to play a role in migraine headache pathophysiology. We present the first successful migraine headache treatment with therapy specifically targeting HSV infection.

CASE PRESENTATION

A previously healthy 21-year-old white woman presented with a severe headache and was diagnosed with severe migraine headache disorder. She initially was treated with standard migraine headache medications without symptomatic improvement. She was then given famciclovir and celecoxib. The patient fully recovered within days and continues to enjoy significant reduction in severity and frequency of symptoms.

DISCUSSION

Famciclovir and celecoxib may work synergistically against HSV. The virus may play a role in the pathophysiology of migraine headaches, and this is the first case report of successful migraine headache treatment with these medications. Further studies are needed to elucidate the efficacy of these medications in treating migraine disorder.

Is the Generally Held View That Intravenous Dihydroergotamine Is Effective in Migraine Based on Wrong "General Consensus" of One Trial? A Critical Review of the Trial and Subsequent Quotations

BACKGROUND

The claim that parenteral dihydroergotamine (DHE) is effective in migraine is based on one randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial from 1986. The aim of this review was to critically evaluate the original article. It was also found to be of interest to review quotes concerning the results in the more than 100 articles subsequently referring to the article.

METHODS

The correctness of the stated effect of intravenous DHE in the randomized clinical trial (RCT) was first critically evaluated. Then, Google Scholar was searched for references to the article and these references were classified as to whether they judged the reported RCT as positive or negative.

RESULTS

The design of the RCT, with a crossover within one migraine attack, only allows evaluation of the results for the first period and the effect of DHE and placebo were quite comparable. About 151 references were found for the article in Google scholar. Among the 95 articles with a judgment on the efficacy of intravenous DHE in the RCT, 90 stated that DHE was effective or likely effective whereas only 5 articles stated that DHE was ineffective.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a "negative" RCT, authors of subsequent articles on the efficacy of parenteral DHE overwhelmingly reported this RCT as "positive." This is probably due to the fact that the authors concluded in the abstract that DHE is effective, and to a kind of "wrong general consensus."

Neurochemical pathways that converge on thalamic trigeminovascular neurons: potential substrate for modulation of migraine by sleep, food intake, stress and anxiety

Dynamic thalamic regulation of sensory signals allows the cortex to adjust better to rapidly changing behavioral, physiological and environmental demands. To fulfill this role, thalamic neurons must themselves be subjected to constantly changing modulatory inputs that originate in multiple neurochemical pathways involved in autonomic, affective and cognitive functions. Our overall goal is to define an anatomical framework for conceptualizing how a ‘decision’ is made on whether a trigeminovascular thalamic neuron fires, for how long, and at what frequency. To begin answering this question, we determine which neuropeptides/neurotransmitters are in a position to modulate thalamic trigeminovascular neurons. Using a combination of in-vivo single-unit recording, juxtacellular labeling with tetramethylrhodamine dextran (TMR) and in-vitro immunohistochemistry, we found that thalamic trigeminovascular neurons were surrounded by high density of axons containing biomarkers of glutamate, GABA, dopamine and serotonin; moderate density of axons containing noradrenaline and histamine; low density of axons containing orexin and melanin concentrating hormone (MCH); but not axons containing CGRP, serotonin 1D receptor, oxytocin or vasopressin. In the context of migraine, the findings suggest that the transmission of headache-related nociceptive signals from the thalamus to the cortex may be modulated by opposing forces (i.e., facilitatory, inhibitory) that are governed by continuous adjustments needed to keep physiological, behavioral, cognitive and emotional homeostasis.

Acute treatment of migraine

Acute treatment of migraine has benefited first from major advances in pharmacological science followed in short order, sometimes preceded, by an improved understanding of pathogenesis, especially of headache. This chapter reviews the mechanisms of migraine that provide an understanding of the pharmacology and therapeutic targets for acute migraine medications. General clinical approaches to acute therapy are reviewed, and indices of acceptable acute therapeutic outcomes are discussed. Currently the serotonin (5-HT) 1B/1D agonist group of drugs, triptans, forms the mainstay of acute therapeutic regimens. Other approaches to acute treatment such as simple analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), ergots, and combination medications are reviewed. Finally, the newest acute treatments that are currently exploratory or under clinical investigation are discussed.

Pharmaceutical Care for Migraine and Headache Patients: A Community-Based, Randomized Intervention

Background:

Despite the high prevalence of headache and migraine in the general population, many people do not receive adequate medical attention and treatment.

Objective:

To evaluate the effects of pharmaceutical care (defined as intensified structured counseling between patient and pharmacist, including the use of drug databases), for patients with headache or migraine, on both clinical and psychological endpoints.

Methods:

A prospective, randomized, controlled intervention study was conducted using pharmacies in Northern Germany. A total of 112 pharmacies (26% of all pharmacies in the study region) recruited 410 patients with headaches. Pharmacies were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group. Patients were interviewed by telephone prior to the intervention and again after 4 months. Primary endpoints were number of days with headache, number and severity of headaches, self-efficacy, and the patients' perceptions of their health-related quality of life.

Results:

Each pharmacy treated an average of 4.6 patients (total time effort 9 h). The intervention group consisted of 201 patients who received pharmaceutical care, whereas the control group comprised 209 patients who received standard counseling. In both groups, the number of headache attacks and intensity of pain in treated headache attacks did not change significantly between the first and second interviews. However, a statistically significant improvement in mental health and self-efficacy was shown in the intervention group. Intensity of pain in untreated headache attacks and the number of days with headache decreased in both groups. Most participants described this intervention as helpful and effective and 90% reported that they would recommend pharmaceutical care to other patients with headache.

Conclusions:

A short-term pharmaceutical care intervention improved patients' mental health and self-efficacy, although it did not significantly change the number and severity of headaches. The increase in self-efficacy and mental health associated with pharmaceutical care may be instrumental in improving long-term pharmacotherapy of patients with migraine and headache. To fully assess the effects of pharmaceutical care, a longer study may be required.

Relief from migraine headache with aripiprazole treatment

There have been many reports of the association between migraine headaches and psychiatric disorders as well as of the utility of dopamine antagonists in the treatment of migraine headache. There is increasing evidence to support the activation of dopaminergic systems as a primary component of migraine pathogenesis. This report documents 3 cases of female migraineurs who received the dopamine modulator aripiprazole for treatment of co-occurring psychiatric disorders and experienced a decrease in migraine frequency and severity. A hypothesis as to the mechanism of action of dopamine regulation in migraine treatment is discussed.

Time to pain freedom and onset of pain relief with rizatriptan 10 mg and prescription usual-care oral medications in the acute treatment of migraine headaches: A multicenter, prospective, open-label, two-attack, crossover study

BACKGROUND

Patients and physicians consider rapid onset of pain relief and pain freedom among the most important attributes of migraine therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the effectiveness of rizatriptan 10 mg and usual-care oral migraine medications in everyday clinical practice settings.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, prospective, open-label study. Adult patients treated 2 sequential migraine attacks with rizatriptan 10 mg and a usual-care prescription migraine medication in a crossover manner. Patients chose which medication to take first. They recorded the treatment outcomes using a stopwatch and a treatment diary. End points included time to pain freedom (length of time from dosing to no pain) and time to onset of pain relief (mean time to onset of pain relief and proportion of patients reporting onset of pain relief at 30 minutes), satisfaction with treatment, and medication preference. Information on adverse events was collected through the normal post-marketing reporting mechanism. Comparisons were made using the paired t test and McNemar test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. A mixed model, accounting for multiple observations per patient, was fitted for the time to pain freedom, controlling for age, sex, treatment period, medication, and headache severity.

RESULTS

Of 2346 enrolled patients, 1489 treated 2 migraines in a crossover manner and were included in the analysis (86.8% women, 13.2% men; mean age, 41.7 years). A majority of patients (80.6%) treated both migraines with oral triptans. The most commonly used nontriptans were NSAIDs (5.4%), butalbital-containing combinations (4.3%), and isometheptene (3.4%). Over-the-counter medications were used by 22.3% of patients during rizatriptan-treated attacks and by 28.9% of patients during attacks treated with usual-care medications. The mean time to pain freedom was significantly shorter when an attack was treated with rizatriptan compared with usual-care medications (222 vs 298 minutes, respectively; P<0.001), and the onset of pain relief was significantly more rapid (85 vs 107 minutes; P=0.003), with significant differences noted as early as 15 minutes after dosing (P<0.001). The findings remained similar after adjustment for potential confounding factors. No significant sequence effect was detected. Significantly more patients reported being very satisfied or satisfied with rizatriptan compared with usual-care medications (65.4% vs 57.7%; P<0.001) and preferred rizatriptan (58.0% vs 42.0%; P<0.001). One female patient reported having hives and itchy skin the day after taking rizatriptan; the symptoms subsided after treatment with methylprednisolone.

CONCLUSIONS

In this selected population, treatment of a migraine attack with rizatriptan 10 mg was associated with a faster time to pain freedom and onset of pain relief compared with treatment with usual-care oral migraine medications. Patients reported greater satisfaction with and preference for rizatriptan.

[Acute treatment of migraine in emergency room: comparative study between dexametasone and haloperidol. Preliminary results]

We studied the efficacy of dexamethasone (4 mg) and haloperidol (5 mg) in the treatment of migraine in the emergency room. Twenty nine patients who had diagnosis of migraine according to the International Headache Society criteria and were evaluated for a painful episode at the emergency room of Santa Casa of São Paulo were included. All the patients scored their pain in 10 when evaluated, even after the use of intravenous analgesia (dipyrone). Fourteen patients were treated with haloperidol and the remaining 15 received dexamethasone. The patients were asked about pain intensity at 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after the use of either the drugs. Both drugs were equally efficient in pain relief after two hours. Patients who were treated with haloperidol showed an important improvement (more than 50% of improve in the analogic pain scale) in the first 30 minutes. The dexamethasone treated patients only reached this grade of analgesia after 120 minutes. Although we studied a small series of patients, our data suggest that both drugs are efficient in the treatment of a refractory migraine attack. Haloperidol seemed to work quickly in pain relief. No important side effects were observed in neither groups.

Sumatriptan plus metoclopramide in triptan-nonresponsive migraineurs

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effectiveness of combination treatment using sumatriptan plus metoclopramide versus sumatriptan alone for the treatment of acute migraine. The patients who were treated had failed to respond to triptans in the past despite adequate doses on at least 2 separate trials of the same triptan or 2 trials involving different triptans.

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence that dopaminergic antagonists may benefit the migraineur by relieving migraine pain and associated symptoms. The exact mechanism of action in migraine is unknown. The postulated action is the inhibition of dopaminergic overactivity. A dopaminergic antagonist, metoclopramide, may improve the efficacy of a 5-HT1B/1D agonist, sumatriptan.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized, crossover study, 16 adult migraineurs fulfilling International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for migraine with or without aura who had failed to receive adequate relief from triptans treated one migraine with each treatment: sumatriptan 50 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg or sumatriptan 50 mg plus placebo to match metoclopramide. Patients treated their migraines when they were moderate or severe in intensity and recorded pain severity and symptoms prior to treatment and 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes and 24 hours after treatment.

RESULTS

Thirteen women and 3 men (mean age, 40 years) completed the study; ie, treated 2 migraines (a total of 32 migraines), one attack with each treatment. Meaningful relief was attained in 10 (63%) of 16 migraines treated with the combination of sumatriptan 50 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg compared with 5 (31%) of 16 migraines treated with sumatriptan 50 mg plus placebo. Headache response (moderate or severe to mild or no pain at 2 hours) was achieved in 7 (44%) of 16 migraines with the combination of sumatriptan 50 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg compared with 5 (31%) of 16 migraines treated with sumatriptan 50 mg plus placebo. There did not appear to be a difference between treatment groups with respect to associated symptoms. The combination of sumatriptan 50 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining sumatriptan with metoclopramide provided relief in some migraineurs who failed to achieve adequate relief with a triptan alone. It remains unknown whether initiating therapy when pain was mild or using a higher dose of sumatriptan (ie, 100 mg) would have provided additional benefit. Further studies are indicated.

Drugs in pregnancy. Anticonvulsants and drugs for neurological disease

The use of anticonvulsant drugs in pregnancy presents unique challenges to clinicians and their patients. The need for control of maternal epilepsy must be balanced with the fetal and neonatal risks associated with anticonvulsant drugs. Anticonvulsant drugs may have potential effects on embryogenesis, neurological development, growth and subsequent paediatric progress. Drug selection and dose adjustment must be appropriate and based on a combination of known maternal and fetal risks as well as the clinical status of the patient. Overall, no one drug can be specifically recommended but monotherapy with most of the recognized first-line drugs will result in a satisfactory outcome. Polytherapy is associated with an increase in congenital malformations and should be avoided if possible. It is possible that newer second-line agents, for example, gabapentin, may be safer as add-on therapy. Neurological disorders such as migraine, and the less common conditions of myasthenia gravis and multiple sclerosis, may require the use of drugs which have not been well studied in pregnancy. Information is provided about the use of drugs to control symptoms and prevent disease progression in these disorders during pregnancy.

Efficacy of nonprescription doses of ibuprofen for treating migraine headache. a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ibuprofen, 200 mg and 400 mg, compared with placebo and each other for the treatment of pain of migraine headache.

BACKGROUND

Migraine headache is a common illness with significant social and economic impact.

DESIGN

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of 6 hours' treatment duration.

METHODS

Fifteen investigators at 17 private practice and referral centers in the United States participated in this study of 660 outpatient adults aged 18 to 84 years with migraine headache of moderate to severe intensity. Each patient was randomly assigned to a single dose of study medication: ibuprofen 200 mg (n = 216) or 400 mg (n = 223), or placebo (n = 221). The percentage of patients with a reduction in baseline headache intensity from severe or moderate to mild or none 2 hours after treatment and the headache pain intensity difference from baseline at 2 hours were the primary efficacy measures. Secondary outcomes included other measures of pain relief, severity differences from baseline for migraine-associated symptoms of nausea, photophobia, phonophobia, and functional disability, and percentage of patients with migraine-associated symptoms reduced to none.

RESULTS

Significantly (P < or = .006) more patients treated with ibuprofen, 200 mg or 400 mg, reported mild to no pain after 2 hours (41.7% and 40.8%, respectively), compared with those treated with placebo (28.1%). The mean pain intensity difference from baseline measured at 2 hours was significantly (P < or = .001) greater for patients treated with ibuprofen 200 mg or 400 mg (0.68 and 0.65, respectively), compared with those treated with placebo (0.39). Statistically significant differences in favor of both doses of ibuprofen over placebo were observed for mean pain intensity difference at 1 hour after treatment. In patients with severe baseline pain intensity, ibuprofen, 400 mg, was significantly (P < or = .048) superior to placebo for the primary efficacy end points, while ibuprofen, 200 mg, was not. Ibuprofen, 200 mg and 400 mg, were statistically significantly more effective than placebo for all clinically important secondary pain relief outcomes. Mean severity changes of migraine-associated symptoms of nausea, photophobia, phonophobia, and functional disability at 2 and 6 hours were significantly (P < or = .03) in favor of both doses of ibuprofen over placebo, and results for the percentage of patients with symptoms reduced to none consistently, although less often statistically significant, favored ibuprofen. No statistically significant differences in adverse events were found among treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ibuprofen at doses of 200 mg and 400 mg is an efficacious, cost-effective, well-tolerated, single-ingredient nonprescription treatment for pain of migraine headache. In addition, while not always statistically significant, ibuprofen provided a beneficial effect on associated symptoms of migraine including nausea, photophobia, phonophobia, and functional disability.

Influence of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists on the pharmacokinetics of rizatriptan, a 5-HT1B/1D agonist: differential effects of propranolol, nadolol and metoprolol

AIMS

Patients with migraine may receive the 5-HT1B/1D agonist, rizatriptan (5 or 10 mg), to control acute attacks. Patients with frequent attacks may also receive propranolol or other beta-adrenoceptor antagonists for migraine prophylaxis. The present studies investigated the potential for pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction between beta-adrenoceptor blockers and rizatriptan.

METHODS

Four double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover investigations were performed in a total of 51 healthy subjects. A single 10 mg dose of rizatriptan was administered after 7 days' administration of propranolol (60 and 120 mg twice daily), nadolol (80 mg twice daily), metoprolol (100 mg twice daily) or placebo. Rizatriptan pharmacokinetics were assessed. In vitro incubations of rizatriptan and sumatriptan with various beta-adrenoceptor blockers were performed in human S9 fraction. Production of the indole-acetic acid-MAO-A metabolite of each triptan was measured.

RESULTS

Administration of rizatriptan during propranolol treatment (120 mg twice daily for 7.5 days) increased the AUC(0, infinity) for rizatriptan by approximately 67% and the Cmax by approximately 75%. A reduction in the dose of propranolol (60 mg twice daily) and/or the incorporation of a delay (1 or 2 h) between propranolol and rizatriptan administration did not produce a statistically significant change in the effect of propranolol on rizatriptan pharmacokinetics. Administration of rizatriptan together with nadolol (80 mg twice daily) or metoprolol (100 mg twice daily) for 7 days did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of rizatriptan. No untoward adverse experiences attributable to the pharmacokinetic interaction between propranolol and rizatriptan were observed, and no subjects developed serious clinical, laboratory, or other significant adverse experiences during coadministration of rizatriptan with any of the beta-adrenoceptor blockers. In vitro incubations showed that propranolol, but not other beta-adrenoceptor blockers significantly inhibited the production of the indole-acetic acid metabolite of rizatriptan and sumatriptan.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that propranolol increases plasma concentrations of rizatriptan by inhibiting monoamine oxidase-A. When prescribing rizatriptan to migraine patients receiving propranolol for prophylaxis, the 5 mg dose of rizatriptan is recommended. Administration with other beta-adrenoceptor blockers does not require consideration of a dose adjustment.

Patterns of ergotamine and sumatriptan use in the Netherlands from 1991 to 1997

The objective of this study was to assess usage patterns of ergotamine and sumatriptan over a period of 6 years, primarily to evaluate the impact that sumatriptan has had on the prescription of ergotamine. This study used ergotamine and sumatriptan prescription data representing inhabitants of eight cities in the Netherlands and covering the period of 1991-1997. The yearly incidence of new users between 1991 and 1997 was estimated for both drugs as well as for the drug of first choice to be prescribed to patients initiating specific abortive migraine treatment with either ergotamine or sumatriptan. Intra-individual ergotamine and sumatriptan usage patterns, characterized by single (incidental), continuous (rate of retention) or switch use, were examined for five patient cohorts, each for a follow-up period of 1 year. During the year of sumatriptan introduction (1991-1992), the overall incidence of new use for both drugs was highest (5.4 per 1000 inhabitants). Hereafter, a substantial reduction of more than 50% was observed. From 1992 to 1996, the yearly incidence of ergotamine first-time use was significantly higher than that of sumatriptan and up to 1996 ergotamine was more than twice as likely than sumatriptan to be prescribed to patients initiating specific abortive treatment. Hereafter, sumatriptan was as likely as ergotamine to be prescribed as the drug of first choice, which coincided with the full reimbursement of sumatriptan tablets. Overall, neurologists were more likely than general practitioners (GPs), to prescribe sumatriptan as the drug of first choice. Approximately half of the total study population were identified as single-time users. This phenomonen occurred more frequently in the ergotamine cohorts. The sumatriptan cohorts displayed a slight yet significant stronger retention rate compared with the ergotamine cohorts. The overall impact of sumatriptan on ergotamine use in The Netherlands was marginal, predominantly due to GP's adherence to migraine treatment guidelines and reimbursement policies concerning sumatriptan tablets. Overall, incidental use was relatively high and may reflect the reported difficulties in diagnosing migraine, lack of patient-doctor consultation, or that anticipated benefits of the drug were not achieved. Further study is required to clarify these issues.

Diagnosis and management of headache

Migraine and tension headaches are among the most common diagnoses in women's health. Secondary causes of headache such as brain tumor, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and meningitis are uncommon but must not be missed. A careful history and physical examination, use of diagnostic criteria, and certain facts about the serious causes of headache are the keys to diagnosis and treatment. Neuroimaging should be limited to patients displaying signs or symptoms of a secondary headache cause. Menstrual migraine can be managed similarly to nonmenstrual migraine.

Functional immunohistochemistry of neuropeptides and nitric oxide synthase in the nerve fibers of the supratentorial dura mater in an experimental migraine model

The supratentorial cerebral dura of the albino rat is equipped with a rich sensory innervation both in the connective tissue and around blood vessels, which includes nociceptive axons and their terminals; these display intense calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) immunoreactivity. Stereotactic electrical stimulation of the trigeminal (Gasserian) ganglion, regarded as an experimental migraine model, caused marked increase and disintegration of club-like perivascular CGRP-immunopositive nerve endings in the dura mater and induced an apparent increase in the lengths of CGRP-immunoreactive axons. Intravenous administration of sumatriptan or eletriptan, prior to electrical stimulation, prevented disintegration of perivascular terminals and induced accumulation of CGRP in terminal and preterminal portions of peripheral sensory axons. Consequently, immunopositive terminals and varicosities increased in size; accumulation of axoplasmic organelles resulted in the "hollow" appearence of numerous varicosities. Since triptans exert their anti-migraine effect by virtue of agonist action on 5-HT(1D/B) receptors, we suggest that these drugs prevent the release of CGRP from perivascular nerve terminals in the dura mater by an action at 5-HT(1D/B) receptors. Nitroglycerine (NitroPOHL), given subcutaneously to rats, induces increased beading of nitric oxide synthase (NOS)-immunoreactive nerve fibers in the supratentorial cerebral dura mater, and an apparent increase in the number of NOS-immunoreactive nerve fibers in the dural areas supplied by the anterior and middle meningeal arteries, and the sinus sagittalis superior. Structural alterations of nitroxidergic axons innervating blood vessels of the dura mater support the idea that nitric oxide (NO) is involved in the induction of headache, a well-known side effect of coronary dilator agents.

Menstrual Migraine

Slightly less than half of women with migraine report that menstruation is an important trigger of headache episodes. However, it is rare that menstruation is the only trigger for a patient and its importance as a trigger may be over- emphasized. Accurate diagnosis requires a prospectively kept diary of information showing a consistent and mechanistically valid temporal correlation between migraine attacks and menstrual periods. Abnormal central nervous system response to normal fluctuations in hormones is the likely underlying cause of menstrual migraine. Patients with menstrual migraine do not generally have hormonal abnormalities. Currently available abortive therapy works well for menstrual-related migraine attacks. For the small subset of women for whom this is not the case, and whose menstrual periods and associated headaches are predictable, pre-emptive treatment of the expected headache with scheduled perimenstrual use of a number of agents can be helpful. A hormonal trigger for migraine headache does not mean that treatment must also be hormonal in nature. Choice of therapy depends on the frequency of menstrual migraine, predictability of menstrual periods, patient preference, and cost. For the small group of women with refractory menstrual migraine, hormonal therapy can be tried, with the understanding that the quality of evidence for these interventions is low and their risk to benefit ratios not established. The perimenstrual use of triptan medications is currently being investigated for the treatment of menstrual migraine. Preliminary results are inconclusive, and until further evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, practicality, and cost effectiveness of this approach is available, their routine use in this manner for menstrual migraine is not recommended.

A comparative study of oral acetylsalicyclic acid and metoprolol for the prophylactic treatment of migraine. A randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group phase III study

This study was a multinational, multicentre, double-blind, active controlled phase III trial designed to investigate efficacy and safety of 300 mg acetylsalicyclic acid (ASA) (n = 135) vs. 200 mg metoprolol (n = 135) in the prophylaxis of migraine. In total 270 (51 male and 219 female) patients, aged 18-65 years, suffering between two and six migraine attacks per month were recruited. The main objective was to show equivalence with respect to efficacy, defined as a 50% reduction in the rate of migraine attacks. A run-in phase was carried out with placebo for 4 weeks, followed by a 16-week drug phase. In both treatment groups the median frequency of migraine attacks improved during the study period, from three to two in the ASA group and from three to one in the metoprolol group; 45.2% of all metoprolol patients were responders compared with 29.6% with ASA. Medication-related adverse events were less frequent in the ASA group (37) than in the metoprolol group (73). The findings from this trial show that metoprolol is superior to ASA for migraine prophylaxis but has more side-effects. Acetylsalicylic acid is better tolerated than metoprolol. Using a strict responder criterion ASA showed a responder rate comparable with the placebo rate in the literature.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between the antimigraine compound, almotriptan, and propranolol in healthy volunteers

This study was designed to assess the pharmacokinetics of almotriptan, a 5-HT1B/1D agonist, when administered in the presence and absence of propranolol. Healthy male (n = 10) and female (n = 2) volunteers received (i) 80 mg propranolol twice daily for 7 days and 12.5 mg almotriptan on day 7, and (ii) 12.5 mg almotriptan on day 7, according to a two-way crossover design. Plasma and urinary almotriptan concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods. Treatment effects on pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistically significant differences between treatments in area under the curve (AUC), clearance, and half-life were observed (P < 0.03), but these differences were < 7%. Ninety percent confidence interval analysis of log-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters showed that the treatments were equivalent. Adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, and no treatment effects on vital signs were observed. The results show that propranolol has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of almotriptan. Concomitant administration of the two drugs is well tolerated.

Survey of migraineurs referred to headache specialists: care, satisfaction, and outcomes

The authors report a survey of 281 migraineurs recently referred to headache specialists by primary care physicians. Compared with care before referral, specialists spent substantially more time with patients and were more likely to ask patients to take a prophylactic drug and to keep a headache diary, to discuss migraine triggers, and to prescribe 5-hydroxytryptamine1B/1D agonists (triptans). After referral, patients reported improved satisfaction with care and significant decreases in frequency, duration, and severity of attacks.

Use and overuse of sumatriptan. Pharmacoepidemiological studies based on prescription register and interview data

The serotonin agonist sumatriptan was marketed in Denmark in 1992 for the treatment of acute attacks of migraine and cluster headache. The clinical development program of the drug was impressive. However, knowledge of the long-term use of sumatriptan in unselected patients was lacking. Misuse of sumatriptan was reported in single patients shortly after the introduction of the drug. The aim of the present thesis was, therefore, to provide an epidemiological description of sumatriptan use with particular emphasis on overuse. The author conducted three studies, two of which were exclusively based on population-based data from a regional (Odense Pharmacoepidemiological Database) and a national (Registry of Drug Statistics, Danish Medicines Agency) prescription registry. Both registries record patient-specific information, thus enabling the conduct of longitudinal studies of drug use. The regional registry covers the county of Funen (reimbursable prescription drugs only), while the national registry records information on all prescriptions presented in the entire country. Consumption was described by means of the Defined Daily Dose (DDD) unit. One DDD of sumatriptan amounts to 100 mg orally or 6 mg subcutaneously. Subjects were classified as recipients of single or multiple prescriptions. Individuals in the latter category were characterized by the 30-day period with the most intensive dispensing of sumatriptan (peak use): low (less than 30 DDD/30 days), intermediate (30-59 DDD/30 days) and high-peak users (60 or more DDD/30 days). In 1995, 33,206 users of sumatriptan were identified in Denmark, corresponding to a 1-year period prevalence of use of 7.8 per 1,000 inhabitants (only persons aged > or = 16 years were included). A female-to-male ratio of 3.8:1 was found. Use was most common among women aged 35-54 years and was highest among 45 to 49-year-olds for both sexes. The standardized period prevalence of sumatriptan use varied regionally between the Danish counties from 6.4 to 9.6 per 1,000 inhabitants. The period prevalence of sumatriptan use in the county of Funen was highly comparable with that of the entire nation. Among the 43,389 sumatriptan users presenting prescriptions for sumatriptan in Denmark in 1994 and 1995, 507 (1.1%) and 1726 (4.0%) belonged to the high and intermediate-peak-use group, respectively. Patients belonging to these two groups were responsible for 38% of the total consumption of sumatriptan. For patients in the high-peak-use group the median span between first and last prescription was 693 days while the median quantity of sumatriptan purchased was 648 DDD. Highly comparable patterns of long-term intense sumatriptan use were found in the data from the regional registry, which covered the 27-month period after the introduction of the drug (February 1992). The register data were highly suggestive of overuse, but lacked essential information, e.g., the indication for use. A third study was therefore conducted using a combination of register and interview data. During a 14-day period, current users of sumatriptan were recruited through community pharmacies in the county of Funen. Respondents returned a signed consent form, including their unique personal identification number (CPR), allowing us to retrieve patient-specific data from the regional registry. For each respondent, all available relevant prescription data for the period 1992-96 were retrieved. Subjects were classified into high, intermediate, and low-peak-use groups according to register data from the 4-year period. The register data were used to evaluate representativity after anonymizing nonrespondent data. The response rates were 33% (7/21) in the high-peak-use group, 47% (30/64) in the intermediate-peak-use group, and 56% (196/350) in the low-peak-use group. Respondents and nonrespondents in the three groups were comparable with regard to age and use of other drugs. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Treatment of migraine headaches

Migraine headaches are common and costly. Patients with migraine frequently seek medical attention from primary care physicians. Although effective therapy is available, migraine is underdiagnosed and undertreated. The 3 main forms of management are avoidance of migraine triggers, treatment of the acute attack with medications, and regular use of preventive medications. Although changes in lifestyle can help to prevent some migraine attacks, the mainstay of treatment is the use of medications taken early during the attack. A wide variety of single-ingredient and combination over-the-counter and prescription medications are now available. Especially effective are the new selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine1 receptor) agonists such as sumatriptan. For patients who have frequent and severe migraine headaches despite the use of acute treatment, preventive medications, including beta-adrenergic blockers, calcium channel blockers, tricyclic antidepressants, and one anticonvulsant, should be considered. The vast majority of patients with migraine can be helped.

Symptomatic pharmacotherapy of migraine

This review summarizes data on the effectiveness of various symptomatic migraine pharmacotherapies and makes recommendations for treatment. A wide variety of agents are available for the symptomatic treatment of migraine headache, including over-the-counter analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), combination products, opiates, ergot alkaloids, corticosteroids, dopamine antagonists, and triptans. In the stepped-care approach, simple analgesics and NSAIDs are the recommended first step for the treatment of mild-to-moderate migraine headaches. Patients who do not respond to first-step treatments may be given ergots, combination products, dopamine antagonists, or triptans as the second step. Corticosteroids or opiates may be used as rescue treatment in patients who do not respond to second-step treatment. A stratified approach to care individualizes treatment based on the severity of the headache and other patient-specific factors. In a stratified approach, dihydroergotamine or triptans may be the first-step treatment for patients who present with a history of severe migraines that have responded poorly to previous treatments. Sumatriptan was the first triptan approved for the symptomatic treatment of migraine headache; newer triptans include zolmitriptan, naratriptan, and rizatriptan. Since sumatriptan is rapidly absorbed by the subcutaneous route, its time to onset of effect is shortest. Among triptan drugs that are administered orally, the relative time to onset may be shorter with rizatriptan than sumatriptan. Naratriptan has a longer time to onset but is associated with a lower rate of migraine recurrence than other triptans. graine headache, ergot alkaloids, triptans,

Intranasal sumatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine in children

Sumatriptan is a highly effective treatment for migraine in adults but its efficacy in children has not been determined. Fourteen children with migraine (6.4 to 9.8 years of age; seven girls, six with aura) participated in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study to evaluate the efficacy of sumatriptan nasal spray. After sumatriptan, 12 of 14 (versus 6 of 14 after placebo) reported a decrease in pain intensity (p = 0.031); complete headache relief was obtained in 9 of 14 after sumatriptan versus 2 of 14 after placebo (p = 0.016). Migraine-associated symptoms were also significantly reduced by sumatriptan.

Effects of dotarizine and flunarizine on chromaffin cell viability and cytosolic Ca2+

Dotarizine (a novel piperazine derivative with antimigraine properties) and flunarizine (a Ca2+ channel antagonist) were compared concerning: first, their ability to cause chromaffin cell damage in vitro; second, the possible correlation of their octanol/water partition coefficients and those of another 28 compounds (i.e., Ca2+ channel antagonists, blockers of histamine H1 receptors, antimycotics, beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, neuroleptics), with their ability to cause cell damage; third, their capacity to protect the cells against the damaging effects of veratridine; and fourth, their capabilities to enhance the basal cytosolic Ca2+ concentration in fura-2-loaded single chromaffin cells, or to modify the pattern of [Ca2+]i oscillations elicited by veratridine. After 24-h exposure to 1-30 microM dotarizine, the viability of bovine adrenal chromaffin cells (measured under phase contrast or as lactate dehydrogenase, released into the medium) was similar to that of control, untreated cells; at 100 microM, 80% lactate dehydrogenase release was produced. At 1-3 microM flunarizine caused no cell damage; however 10 microM caused 20% lactate dehydrogenase release and 30 and 100 microM over 90% lactate dehydrogenase release. The time course of cell damage was considerably faster for flunarizine, in comparison to dotarizine. Out of 30 molecules tested (at 10 microM), having different octanol/water partition coefficients (log P), dotarizine was among the molecules causing no cell damage; flunarizine caused 20% cell loss, lidoflazine and verapamil over 50% cell loss, and penfluridol, draflazine, astemizole or nifedipine over 80% cell loss. No correlation was found between log P and cytotoxicity. Both dotarizine (10-30 microM) and flunarizine (3-10 microM) provided protection against veratridine-induced cell death; however, at 30 microM dotarizine afforded a pronounced protection while flunarizine enhanced the cytotoxic effects of veratridine. Dotarizine (30 microM) (but not flunarizine) caused a prompt transient elevation of the basal [Ca2+]i. Both compounds abolished the K+-induced increases of [Ca2+]i as well as the oscillations of [Ca2+]i induced by veratridine. The blocking effects of dotarizine were readily reversed after washout, while those of flunarizine were long-lasting. These differences might be relevant to the clinical use of dotarizine as an antimigraine drug.

A practical guide to the management and prevention of migraine

Migraine is a paroxysmal disorder with attacks of headache, nausea, vomiting, photo- and phonophobia and malaise. Mild migraine attacks are treated with antiemetics followed by analgesics such as aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), paracetamol (acetaminophen) or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Moderate to severe attacks are treated by antiemetics combined with ergotamine or dihydroergotamine. Sumatriptan, a specific serotonin 5-HT1B/D receptor agonist, is used if attacks do not respond to ergotamine or if intolerable adverse effects occur. The new migraine drugs zolmitriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan and eletriptan differ in their pharmacological profile from sumatriptan, but this translates into only minor differences in efficacy, headache recurrence and adverse effects. Migraine prophylaxis should be implemented when more than 3 attacks occur per month, if attacks do not respond to acute treatment or if the adverse effects of acute treatment are severe. Substances with proven efficacy include the beta-blockers metoprolol and propranolol and the calcium antagonist flunarizine. Drugs less effective or those with unpleasant adverse effects are the serotonin receptor antagonists (pizotifen, methysergide and lisuride), dihydroergotamine, cyclandelate, NSAIDs, valproic acid (sodium valproate) and amitriptyline. The efficacy of aspirin or magnesium is still under evaluation.

[Use of chlorpromazine in the treatment of headache at an emergency service]

Therapeutic measures, with intravenous chlorpromazine, taken during acute headache are evaluated in fourteen patients at the emergency room in Santa Casa de São Paulo. Four patients had the diagnosis of migraine with aura and five patients migraine without aura. Four patients had diagnosis of chronic daily headache with intermittent and superimposed migrainous events. Finally one patient had the diagnosis of chronic paroxysmal hemicrania. All patients were diagnosed according to International Headache Society criteria. The intravenous chlorpromazine dose used was 0.7 mg/Kg diluted in 5% glucose solution and the dose never exceeded 50 mg. The time of drug administration was never less than 60 minutes. The results were considered excellent in all cases. Some patients presented side effects, particularly orthostatic hypotension, always moderate and transitory. This study has clearly demonstrated that intravenous chlorpromazine (0.7 mg/Kg) was highly effective in terminating episodes of primary headache.

A pharmacokinetic interaction study of avitriptan and propranolol

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether a clinically significant change in the pharmacokinetics of avitriptan and propranolol is observed in healthy subjects after coadministration of the two drugs.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetics of avitriptan and propranolol were investigated when the two drugs administered separately and when two 150 mg doses of avitriptan 2 hours apart were added to a steady-state regimen (80 mg twice a day) of propranolol. The pharmacokinetics of metabolites of avitriptan (N-desmethylavitriptan, methoxypyrimidinyl piperazine, and O-desmethylavitriptan) and the pharmacokinetics of 4-hydroxypropranolol were also assessed.

RESULTS

Administration of avitriptan alone and together with propranolol resulted in small increases in mean blood pressure and small decreases in heart rate. Administration of propranolol resulted in lowering of blood pressure and heart rate consistent with the beta-blocking actions of propranolol. There were no changes in the pharmacokinetics of avitriptan after coadministration with propranolol. However, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of propranolol showed a 20% increase after coadministration with avitriptan, whereas the AUC of 4-hydroxypropranolol significantly decreased. Avitriptan therefore appeared to affect the metabolism of propranolol to 4-hydroxypropranolol. The peak plasma concentration and AUC for N-desmethylavitriptan and the AUC for methoxypyrimidinyl piperazine also showed statistically significant increases (about 25%) when avitriptan was coadministered with propranolol.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the wide safety margin of propranolol, the increase in the exposure is not clinically significant. The increase in the exposure to the metabolites of avitriptan is also not considered to be clinically significant because the metabolite contribution to the pharmacologic activity or side effects is expected to be minimal. Based on these findings, avitriptan may be added to a steady-state regimen of propranolol as an abortive antimigraine therapy.

Medication use during pregnancy for neurologic conditions

Care of the pregnant patient is challenging because of the multiple physiologic changes associated with pregnancy and the need to consider the impact of any intervention on the fetus. This article addresses management issues that arise while caring for patients with epilepsy, eclampsia, stroke, multiple sclerosis, and headache. An emphasis is placed on considerations involving medication use and approaches to patient care are suggested.

Syndromes of posttraumatic neurological deterioration in children with no focal lesions revealed by cerebral imaging: evidence for a trigeminovascular pathophysiology

PURPOSE

To explain the pathophysiology of the neurological deterioration that occurs after trivial head injuries in children and that is not caused by focal structural brain damage. Symptoms and/or signs include headache, confusion, drowsiness, vomiting, hemiparesis, cortical blindness, and seizures.

CONCEPT

We propose that children who are susceptible to such neurological attacks have an unstable "trigeminovascular reflex," which is activated by craniofacial trauma.

RATIONALE

After posttraumatic mechanical stimulation and activation of a defective or immature "excitable" trigeminovascular system, release of perivascular vasodilatory peptides causes cerebral hyperemia, which underlies the neurological deterioration.

DISCUSSION

The original assumption that underlying cerebral edema was responsible for these phenomena has been proven incorrect by computed tomography. Subsequent proposed pathophysiological mechanisms include cortical spreading depression and trauma-triggered migraine. Recent research has implicated the trigeminovascular pathways in both these conditions and documented that head trauma can be associated with noncongestive cerebral hyperemia (i.e., not causing swelling). Thus, we propose that head trauma activates trigeminal nerve endings in face, scalp, dura, or cortex and, via a reflex, causes intracranial vasodilation and cerebral hyperemia. Drugs that block trigeminovascular activation might offer a benefit.

Serotonergic effects of dotarizine in coronary artery and in oocytes expressing 5-HT2 receptors

In strips of pig coronary arteries incubated in oxygenated Krebs-bicarbonate solution at 37 degrees C, dotarizine blocked the phasic contractions evoked by 5-HT (0.5 microM) or K+ depolarization (35 mM K+) with an IC50 of 0.22 and 3.7 microM, respectively. Flunarizine inhibited both types of contractions with IC50 values of 1.7 microM for 5-HT and 2.4 microM for K+ responses. In Xenopus oocytes injected with in vitro transcribed RNA encoding for 5-HT2A or 5-HT2C receptors, 5-HT (100 nM for 20 s) applied every 10 min caused, in both cases, a reproducible inward current through Ca2(+)-activated Cl- channels (ICl). Dotarizine inhibited the 5-HT2A response in a concentration-dependent manner, with an IC50 of 2.2 nM. In contrast, the 5-HT2C response was unaffected by 1 microM dotarizine and blocked around 62% by 10 microM of this drug. The ICl activated either by intracellular injection of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) in oocytes or by direct photorelease of Ca2+ in DM-nitrophen-injected oocytes was unaffected by 10 microM dotarizine. It is concluded that dotarizine blocks 5-HT2A receptors with a high affinity; the compound is devoid of intracellular effects on any further steps of the transduction pathway (i.e., IP3 receptor). Contrary to flunarizine that blocks equally well the serotonergic and the K+ vascular responses, dotarizine exhibits 17-fold higher affinity for vascular 5-HT receptors. These findings might be relevant to an understanding of the mechanism involved in the use of dotarizine and flunarizine as prophylactic agents in migraine.

Prophylactic treatment of migraine with bisoprolol: a placebo-controlled study

The objective of the present study was to assess the efficacy of bisoprolol in migraine prophylaxis. A double-blind placebo-controlled study was conducted in 226 patients with migraine with or without aura, a migraine history of at least 2 years at least 3 documented attacks during the 28 days run-in period. The duration of treatment was 12 weeks following an initial 28 days' run-in period. Patients reported the number of attacks and their severity in a diary. Treatment with bisoprolol 5 mg resulted in a significant reduction in the frequency of migraine attacks (39% vs 22%) compared to placebo treatment (p < 0.05). Treatment had no effect on the duration and severity of the attacks. Bisoprolol was well tolerated.

Neurological episodes after minor head injury and trigeminovascular activation

Children appear particularly susceptible to severe but reversible neurological symptoms and/or signs after minor head injury; these include headache, confusion, drowsiness, vomiting, hemiparesis, cortical blindness, or seizures. Significantly, these neurological episodes are not associated with any identifiable structural brain abnormality on neuro-imaging. We propose that the cause of this condition is a reactive hyperaemia, a 'benign hyperaemic encephalopathy' mediated via activation of the trigeminovascular system.

The comorbid association of migraine with osteoarthritis and hypertension: complement C3F and Berkson's bias

Migraine is known to have a major genetic component and has been associated with a wide variety of comorbid disorders including arthritis and heart disease. Since migraine and some of its comorbid disorders involve inflammation, complement C3, a protein involved in acute inflammation, was selected for analysis as a candidate gene in an ongoing study of the genetic basis of migraine. Polymorphism frequencies for complement C3F (0.19) and C3S (0.81) in a sample of 137 unrelated migraineurs were found to be consistent with a control group as well as previous population studies, indicating that this common polymorphism has no association with migraine susceptibility. However, C3F positive individuals with migraine were found to have an increased incidence of osteoarthritis (Chi square = 10.06; p < 0.0008) and hypertension (Chi square = 5.18; p < 0.01). Therefore, the data in the present study indicate that certain migraine comorbidities that have been reported in the literature may result from Berkson's bias as opposed to a shared pathophysiological variation in the C3 gene.

Magnesium taurate and fish oil for prevention of migraine

Although the pathogenesis of migraine is still poorly understood, various clinical investigations, as well as consideration of the characteristic activities of the wide range of drugs known to reduce migraine incidence, suggest that such phenomena as neuronal hyperexcitation, cortical spreading depression, vasospasm, platelet activation and sympathetic hyperactivity often play a part in this syndrome. Increased tissue levels of taurine, as well as increased extracellular magnesium, could be expected to dampen neuronal hyperexcitation, counteract vasospasm, increase tolerance to focal hypoxia and stabilize platelets; taurine may also lessen sympathetic outflow. Thus it is reasonable to speculate that supplemental magnesium taurate will have preventive value in the treatment of migraine. Fish oil, owing to its platelet-stabilizing and antivasospastic actions, may also be useful in this regard, as suggested by a few clinical reports. Although many drugs have value for migraine prophylaxis, the two nutritional measures suggested here may have particular merit owing to the versatility of their actions, their safety and lack of side-effects and their long-term favorable impact on vascular health.

An overview of the diagnosis and pharmacologic treatment of migraine

Migraine, an episodic headache disorder, is one of the most common complaints encountered by primary-care physicians and neurologists. Nevertheless, it remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Rational migraine treatment necessitates an accurate diagnosis, identification and removal of potential triggering factors, and, frequently, pharmacologic intervention. Effective management also includes establishing realistic expectations, patient reassurance, and education. The choice of medication (abortive, symptomatic) for an acute attack depends on such factors as the severity of the attack, presence or absence of vomiting, time of onset to peak pain, rate of bioavailability of the drug, comorbid medical conditions, and side-effect profile. Effective agents for acute attacks include simple or combination analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ergot derivatives, selective serotonin agonists, and antiemetics. Opioid analgesics are unnecessary for most patients. The choice of preventive (prophylactic, interval) medication depends primarily on comorbid medical conditions and side-effect profile. Useful preventive agents include beta-adrenergic blockers, calcium channel blockers, tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsant medications, and serotonin antagonists.

[Treatment of migraine in children]

Simple migraine attacks are usually controlled by rest and an analgesic (acetylsalicylic acid or paracetamol), eventually associated with metoclopramide. More severe cases with failure of these measures may benefit from antimigraine medications such as ergotamine derivatives. Preventive treatment is only indicated in case of frequent (> or = 3 per month) and complicated attacks.