1
|
Hayton T, Gross A, Basson A, Olson K, Ang O, Milne N, Pool J. Psychometric measurement properties of patient-reported and observer-reported outcome measures for spinal mobilisations and manipulation on paediatric subjects with diverse medical conditions: A systematic review. J Man Manip Ther 2024; 32:234-254. [PMID: 38146749 PMCID: PMC11216239 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2281650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Reliable, valid, and responsive outcomes is foundational to address concerns about the risks and benefits of performing spinal manipulation and mobilization in pediatric populations. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence on measurement properties from cohort/case-control/cross-sectional/randomized studies on patient-reported (SQLI - Scoliosis Quality of Life Index; VAS-Visual Analog Scale; PAQLQ - Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire), observer-reported (Crying Diaries; ATEC - Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist) and mixed (PedsQL - Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory) outcome measurements identified through a scoping review on manipulation and mobilization for pediatric populations with diverse medical conditions. METHOD AND ANALYSIS Electronic databases, clinicaltrial.gov and Ebsco Open Dissertations were searched up to 21 October 202221 October 2022. Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Qualitative synthesis was performed using COSMIN and Cochrane GRADE methodology to establish the certainty of evidence and overall rating: sufficient (+), insufficient (-), inconsistent (±), indeterminate (?). RESULTS Eighteen studies (2 SQLI for scoliosis; 1 VAS - perceived influence of exertion or movement/position on low back problems; 1 PAQLQ for asthma; 1 Crying Diaries for infantile colic; 8 ATEC for autism; 5 PedsQL for cerebral palsy/scoliosis/healthy) with 9653 participants were selected. ATEC and PedsQL had overall sufficient (+) measurement properties with moderate certainty evidence. PAQLQ had indeterminate measurement properties with moderate certainty evidence. Very low certainty of evidence identified measurement properties to be indeterminate (?) for SQLI, Crying Diaries, and VAS- perceived influence of exertion or movement/position on low back problems. CONCLUSION ATEC for autism and PedsQL for asthma may be a suitable clinical outcome assessment (COA); additional validation studies on responsiveness and the minimal important difference are needed. Other COA require further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tricia Hayton
- School of Rehabilitation, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anita Gross
- School of Rehabilitation, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Annalie Basson
- Faculty of Health Science, Physiotherapy Department, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Oliver Ang
- Integrative Health and Wellbeing Research Program, Earl E. Bakken Center for Spirituality and Healing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Nikki Milne
- International Organisation of Physical Therapists in Paediatrics, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jan Pool
- Institute of Human Movement Studies, University of Applied Sciences. Utrecht The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Milne N, Longeri L, Patel A, Pool J, Olson K, Basson A, Gross AR. Spinal manipulation and mobilisation in the treatment of infants, children, and adolescents: a systematic scoping review. BMC Pediatr 2022; 22:721. [PMID: 36536328 PMCID: PMC9762100 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03781-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To i) identify and map the available evidence regarding effectiveness and harms of spinal manipulation and mobilisation for infants, children and adolescents with a broad range of conditions; ii) identify and synthesise policies, regulations, position statements and practice guidelines informing their clinical use. DESIGN Systematic scoping review, utilising four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINHAL and Cochrane) and grey literature from root to 4th February 2021. PARTICIPANTS Infants, children and adolescents (birth to < 18 years) with any childhood disorder/condition. INTERVENTION Spinal manipulation and mobilisation OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes relating to common childhood conditions were explored. METHOD Two reviewers (A.P., L.L.) independently screened and selected studies, extracted key findings and assessed methodological quality of included papers using Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Synthesis, Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Text and Opinion Papers, Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and International Centre for Allied Health Evidence Guideline Quality Checklist. A descriptive synthesis of reported findings was undertaken using a levels of evidence approach. RESULTS Eighty-seven articles were included. Methodological quality of articles varied. Spinal manipulation and mobilisation are being utilised clinically by a variety of health professionals to manage paediatric populations with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), asthma, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), back/neck pain, breastfeeding difficulties, cerebral palsy (CP), dysfunctional voiding, excessive crying, headaches, infantile colic, kinetic imbalances due to suboccipital strain (KISS), nocturnal enuresis, otitis media, torticollis and plagiocephaly. The descriptive synthesis revealed: no evidence to explicitly support the effectiveness of spinal manipulation or mobilisation for any condition in paediatric populations. Mild transient symptoms were commonly described in randomised controlled trials and on occasion, moderate-to-severe adverse events were reported in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials and other lower quality studies. There was strong to very strong evidence for 'no significant effect' of spinal manipulation for managing asthma (pulmonary function), headache and nocturnal enuresis, and inconclusive or insufficient evidence for all other conditions explored. There is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions regarding spinal mobilisation to treat paediatric populations with any condition. CONCLUSION Whilst some individual high-quality studies demonstrate positive results for some conditions, our descriptive synthesis of the collective findings does not provide support for spinal manipulation or mobilisation in paediatric populations for any condition. Increased reporting of adverse events is required to determine true risks. Randomised controlled trials examining effectiveness of spinal manipulation and mobilisation in paediatric populations are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki Milne
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Queensland, Australia.
- International Organisation of Physiotherapists in Paediatrics, World Physiotherapy Subgroup, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Lauren Longeri
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anokhi Patel
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jan Pool
- Research Group Lifestyle and Health, Institute of Human Movement Studies, University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kenneth Olson
- International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapy and Northern Rehab Physical Therapy Specialists, Anchorage, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pohlman KA. Support of "A Fall From the Summit" by Goertz et al. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2021; 44:510-511. [PMID: 34144830 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
4
|
Haavik H, Niazi IK, Kumari N, Amjad I, Duehr J, Holt K. The Potential Mechanisms of High-Velocity, Low-Amplitude, Controlled Vertebral Thrusts on Neuroimmune Function: A Narrative Review. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2021; 57:536. [PMID: 34071880 PMCID: PMC8226758 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57060536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The current COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated the need to find healthcare solutions that boost or support immunity. There is some evidence that high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) controlled vertebral thrusts have the potential to modulate immune mediators. However, the mechanisms of the link between HVLA controlled vertebral thrusts and neuroimmune function and the associated potential clinical implications are less clear. This review aims to elucidate the underlying mechanisms that can explain the HVLA controlled vertebral thrust--neuroimmune link and discuss what this link implies for clinical practice and future research needs. A search for relevant articles published up until April 2021 was undertaken. Twenty-three published papers were found that explored the impact of HVLA controlled vertebral thrusts on neuroimmune markers, of which eighteen found a significant effect. These basic science studies show that HVLA controlled vertebral thrust influence the levels of immune mediators in the body, including neuropeptides, inflammatory markers, and endocrine markers. This narravtive review discusses the most likely mechanisms for how HVLA controlled vertebral thrusts could impact these immune markers. The mechanisms are most likely due to the known changes in proprioceptive processing that occur within the central nervous system (CNS), in particular within the prefrontal cortex, following HVLA spinal thrusts. The prefrontal cortex is involved in the regulation of the autonomic nervous system, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the immune system. Bi-directional neuro-immune interactions are affected by emotional or pain-related stress. Stress-induced sympathetic nervous system activity also alters vertebral motor control. Therefore, there are biologically plausible direct and indirect mechanisms that link HVLA controlled vertebral thrusts to the immune system, suggesting HVLA controlled vertebral thrusts have the potential to modulate immune function. However, it is not yet known whether HVLA controlled vertebral thrusts have a clinically relevant impact on immunity. Further research is needed to explore the clinical impact of HVLA controlled vertebral thrusts on immune function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Haavik
- Centre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland 1060, New Zealand; (H.H.); (N.K.); (I.A.); (J.D.)
| | - Imran Khan Niazi
- Centre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland 1060, New Zealand; (H.H.); (N.K.); (I.A.); (J.D.)
- Faculty of Health & Environmental Sciences, Health & Rehabilitation Research Institute, AUT University, Auckland 0627, New Zealand
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Nitika Kumari
- Centre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland 1060, New Zealand; (H.H.); (N.K.); (I.A.); (J.D.)
- Faculty of Health & Environmental Sciences, Health & Rehabilitation Research Institute, AUT University, Auckland 0627, New Zealand
| | - Imran Amjad
- Centre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland 1060, New Zealand; (H.H.); (N.K.); (I.A.); (J.D.)
- Faculty of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad 46000, Pakistan
| | - Jenna Duehr
- Centre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland 1060, New Zealand; (H.H.); (N.K.); (I.A.); (J.D.)
| | - Kelly Holt
- Centre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland 1060, New Zealand; (H.H.); (N.K.); (I.A.); (J.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Extrapolating Beyond the Data in a Systematic Review of Spinal Manipulation for Nonmusculoskeletal Disorders: A Fall From the Summit. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2021; 44:271-279. [PMID: 33879350 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to discuss a literature review-a recent systematic review of nonmusculoskeletal disorders-that demonstrates the potential for faulty conclusions and misguided policy implications, and to offer an alternate interpretation of the data using present models and criteria. METHODS We participated in a chiropractic meeting (Global Summit) that aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature on the efficacy and effectiveness of mobilization or spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) for the primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention and treatment of nonmusculoskeletal disorders. After considering an early draft of the resulting manuscript, we identified points of concern and therefore declined authorship. The present article was developed to describe those concerns about the review and its conclusions. RESULTS Three main concerns were identified: the inherent limitations of a systematic review of 6 articles on the topic of SMT for nonmusculoskeletal disorders, the lack of biological plausibility of collapsing 5 different disorders into a single category, and considerations for best practices when using evidence in policy-making. We propose that the following conclusion is more consistent with a review of the 6 articles. The small cadre of high- or moderate-quality randomized controlled trials reviewed in this study found either no or equivocal effects from SMT as a stand-alone treatment for infantile colic, childhood asthma, hypertension, primary dysmenorrhea, or migraine, and found no or low-quality evidence available to support other nonmusculoskeletal conditions. Therefore, further research is needed to determine if SMT may have an effect in these and other nonmusculoskeletal conditions. Until the results of such research are available, the benefits of SMT for specific or general nonmusculoskeletal disorders should not be promoted as having strong supportive evidence. Further, a lack of evidence cannot be interpreted as counterevidence, nor used as evidence of falsification or verification. CONCLUSION Based on the available evidence, some statements generated from the Summit were extrapolated beyond the data, have the potential to misrepresent the literature, and should be used with caution. Given that none of the trials included in the literature review were definitively negative, the current evidence suggests that more research on nonmusculoskeletal conditions is warranted before any definitive conclusions can be made. Governments, insurers, payers, regulators, educators, and clinicians should avoid using systematic reviews in decisions where the research is insufficient to determine the clinical appropriateness of specific care.
Collapse
|
6
|
Côté P, Hartvigsen J, Axén I, Leboeuf-Yde C, Corso M, Shearer H, Wong J, Marchand AA, Cassidy JD, French S, Kawchuk GN, Mior S, Poulsen E, Srbely J, Ammendolia C, Blanchette MA, Busse JW, Bussières A, Cancelliere C, Christensen HW, De Carvalho D, De Luca K, Du Rose A, Eklund A, Engel R, Goncalves G, Hebert J, Hincapié CA, Hondras M, Kimpton A, Lauridsen HH, Innes S, Meyer AL, Newell D, O'Neill S, Pagé I, Passmore S, Perle SM, Quon J, Rezai M, Stupar M, Swain M, Vitiello A, Weber K, Young KJ, Yu H. The global summit on the efficacy and effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy for the prevention and treatment of non-musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Chiropr Man Therap 2021; 29:8. [PMID: 33596925 PMCID: PMC7890602 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-021-00362-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A small proportion of chiropractors, osteopaths, and other manual medicine providers use spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) to manage non-musculoskeletal disorders. However, the efficacy and effectiveness of these interventions to prevent or treat non-musculoskeletal disorders remain controversial. Objectives We convened a Global Summit of international scientists to conduct a systematic review of the literature to determine the efficacy and effectiveness of SMT for the primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of non-musculoskeletal disorders. Global summit The Global Summit took place on September 14–15, 2019 in Toronto, Canada. It was attended by 50 researchers from 8 countries and 28 observers from 18 chiropractic organizations. At the summit, participants critically appraised the literature and synthesized the evidence. Systematic review of the literature We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and the Index to Chiropractic Literature from inception to May 15, 2019 using subject headings specific to each database and free text words relevant to manipulation/manual therapy, effectiveness, prevention, treatment, and non-musculoskeletal disorders. Eligible for review were randomized controlled trials published in English. The methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed independently by reviewers using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria for randomized controlled trials. We synthesized the evidence from articles with high or acceptable methodological quality according to the Synthesis without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) Guideline. The final risk of bias and evidence tables were reviewed by researchers who attended the Global Summit and 75% (38/50) had to approve the content to reach consensus. Results We retrieved 4997 citations, removed 1123 duplicates and screened 3874 citations. Of those, the eligibility of 32 articles was evaluated at the Global Summit and 16 articles were included in our systematic review. Our synthesis included six randomized controlled trials with acceptable or high methodological quality (reported in seven articles). These trials investigated the efficacy or effectiveness of SMT for the management of infantile colic, childhood asthma, hypertension, primary dysmenorrhea, and migraine. None of the trials evaluated the effectiveness of SMT in preventing the occurrence of non-musculoskeletal disorders. Consensus was reached on the content of all risk of bias and evidence tables. All randomized controlled trials with high or acceptable quality found that SMT was not superior to sham interventions for the treatment of these non-musculoskeletal disorders. Six of 50 participants (12%) in the Global Summit did not approve the final report. Conclusion Our systematic review included six randomized clinical trials (534 participants) of acceptable or high quality investigating the efficacy or effectiveness of SMT for the treatment of non-musculoskeletal disorders. We found no evidence of an effect of SMT for the management of non-musculoskeletal disorders including infantile colic, childhood asthma, hypertension, primary dysmenorrhea, and migraine. This finding challenges the validity of the theory that treating spinal dysfunctions with SMT has a physiological effect on organs and their function. Governments, payers, regulators, educators, and clinicians should consider this evidence when developing policies about the use and reimbursement of SMT for non-musculoskeletal disorders. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-021-00362-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Côté
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada. .,Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and CMCC, Oshawa, Canada. .,Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. .,IHPME, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark
| | - Iben Axén
- Intervention & Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,ELIB - et liv i bevegelse, Oslo, Norway
| | - Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
- Department for Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Melissa Corso
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada.,Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and CMCC, Oshawa, Canada
| | - Heather Shearer
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and CMCC, Oshawa, Canada.,IHPME, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jessica Wong
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada.,Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and CMCC, Oshawa, Canada.,Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrée-Anne Marchand
- Department de Chiropractique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
| | - J David Cassidy
- Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Simon French
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gregory N Kawchuk
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Silvano Mior
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and CMCC, Oshawa, Canada.,Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada
| | - Erik Poulsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - John Srbely
- Department of Human Health & Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
| | - Carlo Ammendolia
- IHPME, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Rebecca MacDonald Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marc-André Blanchette
- Department de Chiropractique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
| | - Jason W Busse
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - André Bussières
- Department de Chiropractique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada.,School of Physical & Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Carolina Cancelliere
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada.,Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and CMCC, Oshawa, Canada
| | | | - Diana De Carvalho
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada
| | - Katie De Luca
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alister Du Rose
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Education University of South Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Andreas Eklund
- Intervention & Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Roger Engel
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Jeffrey Hebert
- Faculty of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada
| | - Cesar A Hincapié
- Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich & Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maria Hondras
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA
| | | | - Henrik Hein Lauridsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Stanley Innes
- College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia
| | | | | | - Søren O'Neill
- Department for Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Spine Center of Southern Denmark, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
| | - Isabelle Pagé
- Department de Chiropractique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
| | - Steven Passmore
- Faculty of Kinesiology & Recreation Management University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Stephen M Perle
- School of Chiropractic, University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, USA
| | - Jeffrey Quon
- School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Mana Rezai
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and CMCC, Oshawa, Canada
| | - Maja Stupar
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael Swain
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrew Vitiello
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, CQ University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kenneth Weber
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| | - Kenneth J Young
- School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, England
| | - Hainan Yu
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada.,Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and CMCC, Oshawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schend J, Rowane M, Sanan N, Hostoffer SR. An Osteopathic Modular Approach to Asthma: A Narrative Review. J Osteopath Med 2020; 120:774-782. [PMID: 32961555 DOI: 10.7556/jaoa.2020.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Asthma is among of the first ailments documented in the existing academic literature as being successfully managed with osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) techniques. Time-efficient and well-tolerated OMT techniques have been gradually added to the literature to manage this increasingly prevalent disease. In this narrative review, the authors discuss previously-published literature describing the history, diagnosis, and management of asthma related to osteopathic principles and practices and OMT application. They also present current and newly-approved medical managements, including biologics and inhaled corticosteroids. This article also includes supplemental videos showcasing OMT techniques for asthma management, which were developed by the authors based on recommendations indicated in the literature.
Collapse
|
8
|
Stępnik J, Kędra A, Czaprowski D. Short-term effect of osteopathic manual techniques (OMT) on respiratory function in healthy individuals. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0235308. [PMID: 32603336 PMCID: PMC7326176 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Respiratory system diseases are some of the most common pathologies worldwide. Although osteopathic manual therapy (OMT) is used predominantly to treat other pathologies, certain OMT techniques have been shown to improve patients’ respiratory function. Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the influence of osteopathic techniques on breathing. Methods Tests were performed with the use of a spirometer and the results were expressed as Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1), and Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF). Thirty healthy males and females between the age of 18 and 50 took part in the research. Fifteen individuals were randomly assigned to the experimental group and fifteen persons were assigned to the placebo group. The participants from the experimental group were treated with such osteopathic techniques aimed at the pulmonary system as the thoracic thrust (manipulations of vertebral joints and ribs), the sternal pump technique and stretching of the diaphragm. The placebo group was treated with soft tissue therapy (STT) techniques for the masseter muscle. Results The described set of osteopathic techniques exerts an influence on PEF in healthy individuals; however, it does not affect FVC and FEV1. Conclusion Osteopathic techniques do not seem to improve lung health, as reflected in FEV1 and FVC, but they improve the respiratory function aspects reflected by PEF in the participants without any history of lung disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Agnieszka Kędra
- Faculty of Physical Education and Health, Józef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Biała Podlaska, Poland
- * E-mail:
| | - Dariusz Czaprowski
- Department of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy Unit, University of Medical Science, Poznań, Poland
- Department of Health Sciences, Olsztyn University, Olsztyn, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Driehuis F, Hoogeboom TJ, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG, de Bie RA, Staal JB. Spinal manual therapy in infants, children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis on treatment indication, technique and outcomes. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0218940. [PMID: 31237917 PMCID: PMC6592551 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies on effectiveness and safety of specific spinal manual therapy (SMT) techniques in children, which distinguish between age groups, are lacking. OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review of the evidence for effectiveness and harms of specific SMT techniques for infants, children and adolescents. METHODS PubMed, Index to Chiropractic Literature, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library were searched up to December 2017. Controlled studies, describing primary SMT treatment in infants (<1 year) and children/adolescents (1-18 years), were included to determine effectiveness. Controlled and observational studies and case reports were included to examine harms. One author screened titles and abstracts and two authors independently screened the full text of potentially eligible studies for inclusion. Two authors assessed risk of bias of included studies and quality of the body of evidence using the GRADE methodology. Data were described according to PRISMA guidelines and CONSORT and TIDieR checklists. If appropriate, random-effects meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS Of the 1,236 identified studies, 26 studies were eligible. Infants and children/adolescents were treated for various (non-)musculoskeletal indications, hypothesized to be related to spinal joint dysfunction. Studies examining the same population, indication and treatment comparison were scarce. Due to very low quality evidence, it is uncertain whether gentle, low-velocity mobilizations reduce complaints in infants with colic or torticollis, and whether high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulations reduce complaints in children/adolescents with autism, asthma, nocturnal enuresis, headache or idiopathic scoliosis. Five case reports described severe harms after HVLA manipulations in four infants and one child. Mild, transient harms were reported after gentle spinal mobilizations in infants and children, and could be interpreted as side effect of treatment. CONCLUSIONS Based on GRADE methodology, we found the evidence was of very low quality; this prevented us from drawing conclusions about the effectiveness of specific SMT techniques in infants, children and adolescents. Outcomes in the included studies were mostly parent or patient-reported; studies did not report on intermediate outcomes to assess the effectiveness of SMT techniques in relation to the hypothesized spinal dysfunction. Severe harms were relatively scarce, poorly described and likely to be associated with underlying missed pathology. Gentle, low-velocity spinal mobilizations seem to be a safe treatment technique in infants, children and adolescents. We encourage future research to describe effectiveness and safety of specific SMT techniques instead of SMT as a general treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Femke Driehuis
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas J. Hoogeboom
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Rob A. de Bie
- Caphri Research School, Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J. Bart Staal
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Research Group Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kalaci O, Giangioppo S, Leung G, Radhakrishnan A, Fleischer E, Lyttle B, Price A, Radhakrishnan D. Complementary and alternative medicine use in children with asthma. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2019; 35:272-277. [PMID: 31003669 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate the overall prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine and specific modalities used among children with asthma, identify predictors of use, and perceived positive or negative effects of therapies. RESULTS Of the 161 children enrolled in the study, 76.4% had ever used complementary and alternative medicine. Humidifiers, air purifiers, and multivitamins were the most common modalities used. Complementary and alternative medicine use in children was associated with family use, younger child age, and disease severity, indicated by recent asthma exacerbation. The majority of participants perceived benefit from their complementary and alternative medicine use, with very few reporting negative side effects. Only 36.7% of participants reported discussing their complementary and alternative medicine use with the asthma clinic healthcare team. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use in children with asthma is high, with the majority of families perceiving benefit from its use. This study offers clinicians a reference to inform families regarding the subjective helpfulness of various types of complementary and alternative medicine modalities that can facilitate the dialogue between health care professionals and families interested in complementary and alternative medicine use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Odion Kalaci
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada.
| | - Sandra Giangioppo
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada.
| | - Garvin Leung
- Faculty of Medicine at the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.
| | - Arun Radhakrishnan
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada.
| | - Erin Fleischer
- Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada.
| | - Brian Lyttle
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada; Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada.
| | - April Price
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada; Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada.
| | - Dhenuka Radhakrishnan
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada; Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gorrell LM, Brown B, Lystad RP, Engel RM. Predictive factors for reporting adverse events following spinal manipulation in randomized clinical trials - secondary analysis of a systematic review. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2017; 30:34-41. [PMID: 28521180 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2016] [Revised: 04/11/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
While spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is recommended for the treatment of spinal disorders, concerns exist about adverse events associated with the intervention. Adequate reporting of adverse events in clinical trials would allow for more accurate estimations of incidence statistics through meta-analysis. However, it is not currently known if there are factors influencing adverse events reporting following SMT in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Thus our objective was to investigate predictive factors for the reporting of adverse events in published RCTs involving SMT. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for RCTs involving SMT. Domains of interest included: sample size; publication date relative to the 2010 CONSORT statement; risk of bias; the region treated; and number of intervention sessions. 7398 records were identified, of which 368 articles were eligible for inclusion. A total of 140 (38.0%) articles reported on adverse events. Articles were more likely to report on adverse events if they possessed larger sample sizes, were published after the 2010 CONSORT statement, had a low risk of bias and involved multiple intervention sessions. The region treated was not a significant predictor for reporting on adverse events. Predictors for reporting on adverse events included larger sample size, publication after the 2010 CONSORT statement, low risk of bias and trials involving multiple intervention sessions. We recommend that researchers focus on developing robust methodologies and participant follow-up regimens for RCTs involving SMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay M Gorrell
- Human Performance Laboratory, KNB 222, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada.
| | - Benjamin Brown
- Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Building C5C West, Sydney, 2109, Australia.
| | - Reidar P Lystad
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, NSW, 2109, Australia.
| | - Roger M Engel
- Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Building C5C West, Sydney, 2109, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Since 1994 chiropractic has been regulated by statute in the UK. Despite this air of respectability, a range of important problems continue to bedevil this profession. Professional organizations of chiropractic and their members make numerous claims which are not supported by sound evidence. Many chiropractors adhere to concepts which fly in the face of science and most seem to regularly violate important principles of ethical behaviour. The advice chiropractors give to their clients is often dangerously misleading. If chiropractic in the UK is to grow into an established health care profession, the General Chiropractic Council and its members should comply with the accepted standards of today's health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edzard Ernst
- Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter & Plymouth, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
The practice of pediatrics from an integrative framework is based on physician-patient relationship, informed by evidence, and approaches the health of children and their families from a broad perspective. This article reviews the basic principles of integrative pediatrics and summarizes data and integrative approaches to common pediatric conditions seen in the primary care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David K Becker
- Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 1545 Divisadero Street, 4th Floor, Box 1726, San Francisco, CA 94143-1726, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wall BA, Peiffer JJ, Losco B, Hebert JJ. The effect of manual therapy on pulmonary function in healthy adults. Sci Rep 2016; 6:33244. [PMID: 27616562 PMCID: PMC5019001 DOI: 10.1038/srep33244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2016] [Accepted: 08/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Manual therapy is suggested as a potentially therapeutic intervention that may improve pulmonary function. However, this form of therapy is largely based on clinical observations and hypothetical models rather than mechanistic knowledge. This study examined the influence of a single session of manual therapy applied to the thoracic spine and thorax on dynamic pulmonary function over an extended time frame in healthy adults. 21 healthy individuals (14 males) aged 19-35 (mean [SD] age = 23 [3.9], BMI [SD] = 22.97 [2.41]) completed one experimental testing session consisting of five pulmonary function tests and the delivery of a manual therapy intervention. Pulmonary function was measured at baseline and 1 minute, 10 minutes, 20 minutes and 30 minutes following the intervention. Baseline mean (SD) forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expired volume in 1 second (FEV1) and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) were 5.55(1.23 L), 4.64(0.92 L) and 165.7(40.0L min(-1)) respectively. The mean (SD) FEV1/FVC ratio was 0.84(0.07). There were no statistically significant changes in any of the pulmonary function measures following the manual therapy intervention. Our findings do not support the use of manual therapy to provide a short-term benefit in respiratory function to healthy adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley A Wall
- School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, 6150, Australia
| | - Jeremiah J Peiffer
- School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, 6150, Australia
| | - Barrett Losco
- School of Health Professions, Murdoch University, Murdoch, 6150, Australia
| | - Jeffrey J Hebert
- School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, 6150, Australia.,Faculty of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, E3B 5A3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lumbar Thrust Manipulation and Exercise for the Treatment of Mechanical Low Back Pain in Adolescents: A Case Series. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016; 46:391-8. [PMID: 27049600 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Study Design Case series. Background Low back pain (LBP) is an increasing problem in health care. The evidence for the use of spinal manipulative therapy to treat pediatric patients with LBP is minimal. The treatment of pediatrics with manual therapy, particularly spinal manipulation, is controversial within the medical community, primarily with respect to adverse events. The purpose of this case series was to illustrate the feasibility and safety of lumbar manipulation plus exercise in the adolescent population with mechanical LBP. Case Description Three patients-a 13-year-old adolescent girl, 15-year-old adolescent girl, and 13-year-old adolescent boy-were treated in an outpatient physical therapy setting for mechanical LBP. All 3 patients were assessed using a lumbar manipulation clinical prediction rule and treated with sidelying lumbar manipulation and exercise. Outcomes Patients were treated for a total of 10 to 14 visits over a course of 8 to 9 weeks. Pain (measured by a numeric pain-rating scale) and disability (measured by the modified Oswestry Disability Index) improved to 0/10 and 0%, respectively, in each patient. No adverse reactions to manipulation were reported. Discussion The results of this case series describe the use of lumbar thrust manipulation and exercise for the treatment of mechanical LBP in adolescents. The positive results indicate that lumbar manipulation may be a safe adjunct therapy. Further studies, including randomized controlled trials, are needed to determine effectiveness. Level of Evidence Therapy, level 4. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(5):391-398. Epub 6 Apr 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6366.
Collapse
|
16
|
Scichilone N, Ventura MT, Bonini M, Braido F, Bucca C, Caminati M, Del Giacco S, Heffler E, Lombardi C, Matucci A, Milanese M, Paganelli R, Passalacqua G, Patella V, Ridolo E, Rolla G, Rossi O, Schiavino D, Senna G, Steinhilber G, Vultaggio A, Canonica G. Choosing wisely: practical considerations on treatment efficacy and safety of asthma in the elderly. Clin Mol Allergy 2015; 13:7. [PMID: 26101468 PMCID: PMC4476207 DOI: 10.1186/s12948-015-0016-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2015] [Accepted: 03/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of asthma in the most advanced ages is similar to that of younger ages. However, the concept that older individuals may suffer from allergic asthma has been largely denied in the past, and a common belief attributes to asthma the definition of "rare" disease. Indeed, asthma in the elderly is often underdiagnosed or diagnosed as COPD, thus leading to undertreatment of improper treatment. This is also due to the heterogeneity of clinical and functional presentations of geriatric asthma, including the partial loss of reversibility and the lower occurrence of the allergic component in this age range. The older asthmatic patients are also characterized the coexistence of comorbid conditions that, in conjunction with age-associated structural and functional changes of the lung, may contribute to complicate the management of asthma. The current review addresses the main issues related to the management of allergic asthma in the geriatric age. In particular, the paper aims at revising current pharmacological and non pharmacological treatments for allergic asthmatics of advanced ages, primarily focusing on their safety and efficacy, although most behaviors are an arbitrary extrapolation of what has been tested in young ages. In fact, age has always represented an exclusion criterion for eligibility to clinical trials. Experimental studies and real life observations specifically testing the efficacy and safety of therapeutic approaches in allergic asthma in the elderly are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Scichilone
- />Department of Medicine, University of Palermo, via Trabucco 180, 90146 Palermo, Italy
| | - Maria T Ventura
- />Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Unit of Geriatric Immunoallergology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Matteo Bonini
- />Lung Function Unit, Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases “Sapienza”, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Fulvio Braido
- />Respiratory Diseases & Allergy Clinic, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy
| | - Caterina Bucca
- />Pneumology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, AOU San Giovanni Battista, Torino, Italy
| | - Marco Caminati
- />Allergy Unit, Verona University and General Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Del Giacco
- />Department of Medical Sciences “M. Aresu”, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Enrico Heffler
- />Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine - Respiratory Medicine & Allergy, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Carlo Lombardi
- />Departmental Unit of Allergology-Clinical Immunology & Pneumology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Andrea Matucci
- />Centre of Excellence DENOTHE, Dept. of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Units of Immunoallergology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Manlio Milanese
- />Struttura Complessa di Pneumologia, ASL2 Savonese, Savona, Italy
| | - Roberto Paganelli
- />Laboratory of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine and Sciences of Aging, University of G. d’Annunzio, Chieti Scalo, Italy
| | - Giovanni Passalacqua
- />Respiratory Diseases & Allergy Clinic, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Patella
- />Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, ASL SALERNO, Hospital of Battipaglia, 84100 Salerno, Italy
| | - Erminia Ridolo
- />Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Rolla
- />Allergologia e Immunologia Clinica, AO Ordine Mauriziano & University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Oliviero Rossi
- />Units of Immunoallergology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Domenico Schiavino
- />Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico A.Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianenrico Senna
- />Allergy Unit, Verona University and General Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Alessandra Vultaggio
- />Centre of Excellence DENOTHE, Dept. of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Units of Immunoallergology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Giorgio Canonica
- />Respiratory Diseases & Allergy Clinic, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Henley CE, Wilson TE. Use of beat-to-beat cardiovascular variability data to determine the validity of sham therapy as the placebo control in osteopathic manipulative medicine research. J Osteopath Med 2014; 114:860-6. [PMID: 25352407 DOI: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Osteopathic manipulative medicine researchers often use sham therapy as the placebo control during clinical trials. Optimally, the sham therapy should be a hands-on procedure that is perceptually indistinguishable from osteopathic manipulative treatment, does not create an effect on its own, and is not a treatment intervention. However, the sham therapy itself may often influence the outcome. The use of cardiovascular variability (eg, beat-to-beat heart rate variability) as a surrogate for the autonomic nervous system is one objective method by which to identify such an effect. By monitoring cardiovascular variability, investigators can assess autonomic nervous system activity as a response to the sham therapy and quickly determine whether or not the selected sham therapy is a true placebo control. The authors provide evidence for assessment of beat-to-beat heart rate variability as one method for assuring objectivity of sham therapy as a placebo control in osteopathic manipulative medicine research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles E Henley
- From the Marian University College of Osteopathic Medicine in Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Thad E Wilson
- From the Marian University College of Osteopathic Medicine in Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Todd AJ, Carroll MT, Robinson A, Mitchell EKL. Adverse Events Due to Chiropractic and Other Manual Therapies for Infants and Children: A Review of the Literature. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2014; 38:699-712. [PMID: 25439034 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2014] [Revised: 08/19/2014] [Accepted: 08/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to review the literature for cases of adverse events in infants and children treated by chiropractors or other manual therapists, identifying treatment type and if a preexisting pathology was present. METHOD English language, peer-reviewed journals and non-peer-reviewed case reports discussing adverse events (ranging from minor to serious) were systematically searched from inception of the relevant searchable bibliographic databases through March 2014. Articles not referring to infants or children were excluded. RESULTS Thirty-one articles met the selection criteria. A total of 12 articles reporting 15 serious adverse events were found. Three deaths occurred under the care of various providers (1 physical therapist, 1 unknown practitioner, and 1 craniosacral therapist) and 12 serious injuries were reported (7 chiropractors/doctors of chiropractic, 1 medical practitioner, 1 osteopath, 2 physical therapists, and 1 unknown practitioner). High-velocity, extension, and rotational spinal manipulation was reported in most cases, with 1 case involving forcibly applied craniosacral dural tension and another involving use of an adjusting instrument. Underlying preexisting pathology was identified in a majority of the cases. CONCLUSION Published cases of serious adverse events in infants and children receiving chiropractic, osteopathic, physiotherapy, or manual medical therapy are rare. The 3 deaths that have been reported were associated with various manual therapists; however, no deaths associated with chiropractic care were found in the literature to date. Because underlying preexisting pathology was associated in a majority of reported cases, performing a thorough history and examination to exclude anatomical or neurologic anomalies before applying any manual therapy may further reduce adverse events across all manual therapy professions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela J Todd
- Chiropractor, Private Practice; PhD Student, Department of Rural and Indigenous Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School Of Rural Health, Moe, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Matthew T Carroll
- Senior Research Fellow, School of Rural Health-Churchill, Monash University, Churchill, Australia
| | - Anske Robinson
- Lecturer, Department of Rural and Indigenous Health, School of Rural Health, Monash University, Moe, Australia
| | - Eleanor K L Mitchell
- Lecturer, Department of Rural and Indigenous Health, School of Rural Health, Monash University, Moe, Australia; Lecturer, School of Rural Health-East Gippsland, Monash University, Bairnsdale, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jones M, Troup F, Nugus J, Roughton M, Hodson M, Rayner C, Bowen F, Pryor J. Does manual therapy provide additional benefit to breathing retraining in the management of dysfunctional breathing? A randomised controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil 2014; 37:763-70. [PMID: 25026508 DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.941020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Dysfunctional breathing (DB) is associated with an abnormal breathing pattern, unexplained breathlessness and significant patient morbidity. Treatment involves breathing retraining through respiratory physiotherapy. Recently, manual therapy (MT) has also been used, but no evidence exists to validate its use. This study sought to investigate whether MT produces additional benefit when compared with breathing retraining alone in patients with DB. METHODS Sixty subjects with primary DB were randomised into either breathing retraining (standard treatment; n = 30) or breathing retraining plus MT (intervention; n = 30) group. Both the groups received standardised respiratory physiotherapy, which included: DB education, breathing retraining, home regimen, and audio disc. Intervention group subjects additionally received MT following further assessment. Data from 57 subjects were analysed. RESULTS At baseline, standard treatment group subjects were statistically younger (41.7 + 13.5 versus 50.8 + 13.0 years; p = 0.001) with higher Nijmegen scores (38.6 + 9.5 versus 31.5 + 6.9; p = 0.001). However, no significant difference was found between the groups for primary outcome Nijmegen score (95% CI (-1.1, 6.6) p = 0.162), or any secondary outcomes (Hospital Anxiety & Depression Score, spirometry or exercise tolerance). CONCLUSION Breathing retraining is currently the mainstay of treatment for patients with DB. The results of this study suggest MT provides no additional benefit in this patient group. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Dysfunctional breathing (DB) is associated with significant patient morbidity but often goes unrecognised, leading to prolonged investigation and significant use of health care resources. Breathing retraining remains the primary management of this condition. However, physiotherapists are also using manual therapy (MT) as an adjunctive treatment for patients with DB. However, the results of this study suggest that MT provides no further benefit and cannot be recommended in the clinical management of this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandy Jones
- School of Health Science and Social Care, Brunel University , London , UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Scholten-Peeters GGM, Thoomes E, Konings S, Beijer M, Verkerk K, Koes BW, Verhagen AP. Is manipulative therapy more effective than sham manipulation in adults : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chiropr Man Therap 2013; 21:34. [PMID: 24274314 PMCID: PMC3850908 DOI: 10.1186/2045-709x-21-34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2013] [Accepted: 09/28/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Manipulative therapy is widely used in the treatment of spinal disorders. Manipulative techniques are under debate because of the possibility of adverse events. To date, the efficacy of manipulations compared to sham manipulations is unclear. The purpose of the study is: to assess the efficacy of manipulative therapy compared to sham in adults with a variety of complaints. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS Bibliographic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, Central) along with a hand search of selected bibliographies were searched from inception up to April 2012. RESULTS In total 965 references were screened for eligibility and 19 RCTs (n = 1080) met the selection criteria. Eight studies were considered of low risk of bias. There is moderate level of evidence that manipulative therapy has a significant effect in adults on pain relief immediately after treatment (standardized mean difference [SMD] - 0.68, 95% confidence interval (-1.06 to -0.31). There is low level of evidence that manipulative therapy has a significant effect in adults on pain relief (SMD - 0.37, -0.69 to -0.04) at short- term follow-up. In patients with musculoskeletal disorders, we found moderate level of evidence for pain relief (SMD - 0.73, -1.21 to -0.25) immediate after treatment and low level of evidence for pain relief (SMD - 0.52, -0.87 to -0.17) at short term-follow-up. We found very low level of evidence that manipulative therapy has no statistically significant effect on disability and perceived (asthma) recovery. Sensitivity analyses did not change the main findings. No serious adverse events were reported in the manipulative therapy or sham group. CONCLUSIONS Manipulative therapy has a clinical relevant effect on pain, but not on disability or perceived (asthma) recovery. Clinicians can refer patients for manipulative therapy to reduce pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwendolijne GM Scholten-Peeters
- University of Applied Sciences AVANS, Research Group Diagnostics, PO Box 90116, Breda, RA 4800, The Netherlands
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre, University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Thoomes
- University of Applied Sciences AVANS, Research Group Diagnostics, PO Box 90116, Breda, RA 4800, The Netherlands
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre, University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie Konings
- Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Department physical therapy, Museumpark 40, Rotterdam, CX 3015, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle Beijer
- Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Department physical therapy, Museumpark 40, Rotterdam, CX 3015, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Verkerk
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre, University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands
- Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Department physical therapy, Museumpark 40, Rotterdam, CX 3015, The Netherlands
| | - Bart W Koes
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre, University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands
| | - Arianne P Verhagen
- University of Applied Sciences AVANS, Research Group Diagnostics, PO Box 90116, Breda, RA 4800, The Netherlands
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre, University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Manual therapy for childhood respiratory disease: a systematic review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2013; 36:57-65. [PMID: 23380215 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2011] [Revised: 04/23/2012] [Accepted: 05/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study reviewed the scientific evidence available on the effects of manipulative techniques on children with respiratory diseases. METHOD Three databases (SciELO, PEDro, and MEDLINE) were searched for clinical trials on the effects of manual therapy techniques on children and adolescents with respiratory diseases. The relevant studies were chosen by 2 independent researchers who assessed their abstracts and selected the studies that met the criteria for a complete and structured review. RESULTS Of the 1147 relevant titles, 103 titles were selected for abstract assessment, and of these, 24 were selected for a full-text review. After critical analysis, 8 studies were included in the review and 16 were excluded for the following reasons: 1 covered only conventional therapy, 7 were not about the studied theme, and 8 included adults. Of the 8 studies included in the present review, 5 consisted of asthmatic children and the others of children with the following conditions: cystic fibrosis, bronchiolitis, recurrent respiratory infections, among others. Only 2 studies did not identify positive results with the use of manual therapy. The other 6 studies found some benefit, specifically in spirometric parameters, immunologic tests, anxiety questionnaire, or level of salivary cortisol. CONCLUSION The use of manual techniques on children with respiratory diseases seems to be beneficial. Chiropractic, osteopathic medicine, and massage are the most common interventions. The lack of standardized procedures and limited variety of methods used evidenced the need for more studies on the subject.
Collapse
|
22
|
George M, Topaz M. A systematic review of complementary and alternative medicine for asthma self-management. Nurs Clin North Am 2013; 48:53-149. [PMID: 23465447 DOI: 10.1016/j.cnur.2012.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
This article is a systematic review of complementary and alternative medicine use for pediatric and adult asthma self-management. The aim of the review was to summarize the existing body of research regarding the types and patterns of, adverse events and risky behaviors associated with, and patient-provider communication about complementary therapies in asthma. This evidence serves as the basis for a series of recommendations in support of patient-centered care, which addresses both patient preferences for integrated treatment and patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maureen George
- Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, 418 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Alcantara J, Alcantara JD, Alcantara J. The chiropractic care of patients with asthma: a systematic review of the literature to inform clinical practice. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clch.2012.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
24
|
Blum CL. Role of chiropractic and sacro-occipital technique in asthma treatment. J Chiropr Med 2011; 1:16-22. [PMID: 19674555 DOI: 10.1016/s0899-3467(07)60023-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Asthma is a multifactorial dysfunction of the respiratory system. Nutritional, environmental, genetic, and emotional factors all play animportant part in the etiology of this condition. One form of chiropractic, Sacro Occipital Technique (SOT), offers some conservative alternatives to the treatment of asthma. SOT expands the chiropractic armamentarium of techniques available, allowing methods putatively affecting the viscera, vertebra, post and preganglionic reflexes, as well as cranial and sacral influences on the primary respiratory mechanism. Though more research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of chiropractic care of asthma, the conservative nature of chiropractic care with its minimal side effects, warrants patient and a health practitioner's consideration prior to embarking on any course of treatment that might have serious side effects.
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
Durant CL, Verhoef MJ, Conway PJ, Sauve RS. Chiropractic treatment of patients younger than 18 years of age: Frequency, patterns and chiropractors' beliefs. Paediatr Child Health 2011; 6:433-8. [PMID: 20107550 DOI: 10.1093/pch/6.7.433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore how and when chiropractors are involved in the care of patients younger than 18 years of age, and to examine chiropractors' beliefs about treating paediatric patients. DESIGN A cross-sectional survey of a random sample of 140 chiropractors practising in Alberta. Data were collected by means of a mailed questionnaire, which elicited practice information and chiropractors' beliefs, and included closed-and open-ended questions related to six vignettes of paediatric health problems. RESULTS Fifty-seven per cent of chiropractors responded to the questionnaire. All chiropractors indicated that they treat patients younger than 18 years of age. Nine per cent of respondents do not treat patients younger than age two years, and 4% do not treat patients from ages six to 11 years. On average, 13% of chiropractors' total patient load over the month preceding the completion of the questionnaires consisted of patients younger than the age of 18 years. With increasing age, patients are more likely to present with musculoskeletal problems (23% of patients younger than age two years, 84% of those aged 14 to 17 years). Chiropractors reported that they provided musculoskeletal treatment regardless of the cause of the problem. A high percentage of chiropractors refer to physicians and reported that they would like to provide concomitant care with physicians. CONCLUSION The present study has shown that chiropractors do treat children and that their opinions about this practice vary by specific condition. In addition, substantial percentages of chiropractors indicated that they would like to work with physicians in treating patients with nonmusculoskeletal conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C L Durant
- Department of Community Health Sciences, The University of Calgary, Calgary
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
|
28
|
Ferrance RJ, Miller J. Chiropractic diagnosis and management of non-musculoskeletal conditions in children and adolescents. CHIROPRACTIC & OSTEOPATHY 2010; 18:14. [PMID: 20525197 PMCID: PMC2891801 DOI: 10.1186/1746-1340-18-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2009] [Accepted: 06/02/2010] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Background A great deal has been published in the chiropractic literature regarding the response, or lack thereof, of various common pediatric conditions to chiropractic care. The majority of that literature is of low scientific value (that is, case reports or case series). The purpose of this review is to summarize the literature from the point of view of clinicians, rather than researchers, and to discuss some additional detail of the conditions themselves. Methods Databases searched were PubMed, Mantis, Index to Chiropractic Literature, and CINAHL. Keywords were chiropractic paired with colic, crying infant, nocturnal enuresis, asthma, otitis media and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Results Most of the published literature centers around case reports or series. The more scientifically rigorous studies show conflicting results for colic and the crying infant, and there is little data to suggest improvement of otitis media, asthma, nocturnal enuresis or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Discussion The efficacy of chiropractic care in the treatment of non-musculoskeletal disorders has yet to be definitely proven or disproven, with the burden of proof still resting upon the chiropractic profession.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randy J Ferrance
- Hospitalist and Medical Director of Hospital-Based Quality, Riverside Tappahannock Hospital, Tappahannock, VA, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Passalacqua G. Complementary/alternative medicines in allergic disease. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2010; 1:113-21. [PMID: 20477659 DOI: 10.1586/1744666x.1.1.113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Complementary/alternative medicines is a generic term that encompasses a variety of approaches, including homeopathy, acupuncture, phytotherapy and numerous holistic or behavioral techniques. Complementary/alternative medicines are widely used in a number of conditions, including asthma and rhinitis. The medical literature on complementary/alternative medicines is impressive, but there are few clinical studies conducted with an appropriate methodology, and their results are negative or conflicting. In general, the results are insufficient to provide recommendations for the use of complementary/alternative medicines in clinical practice. Regarding diagnostic techniques, none have demonstrated the capability of distinguishing between healthy and allergic subjects and none are able to identify sensitizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Passalacqua
- University of Genoa, Department of Internal Medicine, Padiglione Maragliano, Genoa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans R, Leininger B, Triano J. Effectiveness of manual therapies: the UK evidence report. CHIROPRACTIC & OSTEOPATHY 2010; 18:3. [PMID: 20184717 PMCID: PMC2841070 DOI: 10.1186/1746-1340-18-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 274] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2009] [Accepted: 02/25/2010] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this report is to provide a succinct but comprehensive summary of the scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of manual treatment for the management of a variety of musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal conditions. METHODS The conclusions are based on the results of systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), widely accepted and primarily UK and United States evidence-based clinical guidelines, plus the results of all RCTs not yet included in the first three categories. The strength/quality of the evidence regarding effectiveness was based on an adapted version of the grading system developed by the US Preventive Services Task Force and a study risk of bias assessment tool for the recent RCTs. RESULTS By September 2009, 26 categories of conditions were located containing RCT evidence for the use of manual therapy: 13 musculoskeletal conditions, four types of chronic headache and nine non-musculoskeletal conditions. We identified 49 recent relevant systematic reviews and 16 evidence-based clinical guidelines plus an additional 46 RCTs not yet included in systematic reviews and guidelines.Additionally, brief references are made to other effective non-pharmacological, non-invasive physical treatments. CONCLUSIONS Spinal manipulation/mobilization is effective in adults for: acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain; migraine and cervicogenic headache; cervicogenic dizziness; manipulation/mobilization is effective for several extremity joint conditions; and thoracic manipulation/mobilization is effective for acute/subacute neck pain. The evidence is inconclusive for cervical manipulation/mobilization alone for neck pain of any duration, and for manipulation/mobilization for mid back pain, sciatica, tension-type headache, coccydynia, temporomandibular joint disorders, fibromyalgia, premenstrual syndrome, and pneumonia in older adults. Spinal manipulation is not effective for asthma and dysmenorrhea when compared to sham manipulation, or for Stage 1 hypertension when added to an antihypertensive diet. In children, the evidence is inconclusive regarding the effectiveness for otitis media and enuresis, and it is not effective for infantile colic and asthma when compared to sham manipulation.Massage is effective in adults for chronic low back pain and chronic neck pain. The evidence is inconclusive for knee osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, myofascial pain syndrome, migraine headache, and premenstrual syndrome. In children, the evidence is inconclusive for asthma and infantile colic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gert Bronfort
- Northwestern Health Sciences University, Bloomington, MN, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Asthma in children and young adults is a complex disease with many different phenotypic expressions. Diagnosis is often made based on history and lung function including measuring airway reversibility. However, in children younger than 6 years of age, the diagnosis is more difficult because many children wheeze in the first 4-6 years of life, especially with viral infections. For those children, asthma treatment is often started empirically. Those who go on to develop chronic asthma most likely have a genetic predisposition and exposure to various environmental factors resulting in chronic inflammation of the lower respiratory tract. There are established national guidelines for diagnosing and treating asthma in children and adults. For persistent asthma, it is recommended that medications be taken on a regular basis after identifying and avoiding environmental triggers. Because many factors play a role in developing asthma in children, many nonmedical approaches to asthma and asthma-like conditions have been promoted even when the diagnosis is at times uncertain. The nonmedical approaches and therapies are often referred to as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). This review will discuss the conventional therapies recommended for children with asthma in addition to CAM therapies, some of which have supporting scientific evidence. Integrating conventional and CAM therapies can prove to be an effective way to treat pediatric asthma, a common and chronic childhood lung disorder. A case is provided to illustrate how such an integrative approach was used in the successful treatment of a child with moderate persistent asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John David Mark
- Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford, 770 Welch Road, Ste 350, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Xiang YT, Luk ESL, Lai KYC. Quality of life in parents of children with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder in Hong Kong. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2009; 43:731-8. [PMID: 19629794 DOI: 10.1080/00048670903001968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is no study on the quality of life (QOL) of parents of children with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), although QOL is increasingly gaining more attention and the interactions between children and their parents are bi-directional. The aim of the present study was therefore to survey the QOL of parents of children with ADHD in Hong Kong, and explore the relationships of sociodemographic and clinical variables with QOL. METHOD Seventy-seven parents of children with ADHD were consecutively selected and the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the parents and their children were assessed. RESULTS Compared with the general population in Hong Kong, significantly lower scores in physical, psychological, social and environmental QOL domains were found in the parents of children with ADHD. On multivariate analysis, for the children with ADHD, the severity of emotional and hyperactivity/inattention symptoms, and having a comorbid pervasive developmental disorder were significantly correlated with one or more domains of QOL; while for the parents, educational level, household monthly income and having major medical conditions were significantly correlated with one or more domains of QOL. CONCLUSIONS Parents of children with ADHD have low QOL and research is needed to understand the underlying problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Tao Xiang
- Department of Psychiatry, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ernst E. Spinal manipulation for asthma: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. Respir Med 2009; 103:1791-5. [PMID: 19646855 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2009] [Revised: 05/19/2009] [Accepted: 06/28/2009] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Some clinicians believe that spinal manipulation is an effective treatment for asthma. The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the evidence for or against this claim. Four electronic databases were searched without language restrictions from their inceptions to September 2008. Bibliographies and departmental files were hand-searched. The methodological quality of all included studies was assessed with the Jadad score. Only randomised clinical trials of spinal manipulation as a treatment of asthma were included. Three studies met these criteria. All of them were of excellent methodological quality (Jadad score 5) and all used sham-manipulation as the control intervention. None of the studies showed that real manipulation was more effective than sham-manipulation in improving lung function or subjective symptoms. It is concluded that, according to the evidence of the most rigorous studies available to date, spinal manipulation is not an effective treatment for asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Ernst
- Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter & Plymouth, 25 Victoria Park Road,Exeter EX2 4NT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
|
35
|
Gotlib A, Rupert R. Chiropractic manipulation in pediatric health conditions--an updated systematic review. CHIROPRACTIC & OSTEOPATHY 2008; 16:11. [PMID: 18789139 PMCID: PMC2553791 DOI: 10.1186/1746-1340-16-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2008] [Accepted: 09/12/2008] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Objective Our purpose was to review the biomedical literature from January 2004 to June 2007 inclusive to determine the extent of new evidence related to the therapeutic application of manipulation for pediatric health conditions. This updates a previous systematic review published in 2005. No critical appraisal of the evidence is undertaken. Data Sources We searched both the indexed and non-indexed biomedical manual therapy literature. This included PubMed, MANTIS, CINAHL, ICL, as well as reference tracking. Other resources included the Cochrane Library, CCOHTA, PEDro, WHO ICTRP, AMED, EMBASE and AHRQ databases, as well as research conferences and symposium proceedings. Results The search identified 1275 citations of which 57 discrete citations met the eligibility criteria determined by three reviewers who then determined by consensus, each citation's appropriate level on the strength of evidence scale. The new evidence from the relevant time period was 1 systematic review, 1 RCT, 2 observational studies, 36 descriptive case studies and 17 conference abstracts. When this additional evidence is combined with the previous systematic review undertaken up to 2003, there are now in total, 2 systematic reviews, 10 RCT's, 3 observational studies, 177 descriptive studies, and 31 conference abstracts defining this body of knowledge. Summary There has been no substantive shift in this body of knowledge during the past 3 1/2 years. The health claims made by chiropractors with respect to the application of manipulation as a health care intervention for pediatric health conditions continue to be supported by only low levels of scientific evidence. Chiropractors continue to treat a wide variety of pediatric health conditions. The evidence rests primarily with clinical experience, descriptive case studies and very few observational and experimental studies. The health interests of pediatric patients would be advanced if more rigorous scientific inquiry was undertaken to examine the value of manipulative therapy in the treatment of pediatric conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan Gotlib
- Canadian Chiropractic Association, CMCC Homewood Professor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Childhood asthma is a spectrum of symptoms and clinical presentations. The treatment begins with developing goals of therapy for a child by the health care provider, the family, and the child as a team. The primary objective is to reduce symptoms and exacerbations using therapies that include conventional medications, environmental controls, and lifestyle modification while reducing the potential for adverse effects of medications and the disease. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) may play a role in meeting these objectives, and through the integration of conventional and CAM therapies, an integrative medicine approach may facilitate reaching these objectives in a more effective manner.
Collapse
|
37
|
Gouveia LO, Castanho P, Ferreira JJ, Guedes MM, Falcão F, e Melo TP. Chiropractic manipulation: reasons for concern? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2007; 109:922-5. [PMID: 17904731 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2007] [Revised: 07/31/2007] [Accepted: 08/10/2007] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Chiropractic's popularity is rising among the general population. Moreover, few studies have been conducted to properly evaluate its safety. We report three cases of serious neurological adverse events in patients treated with chiropractic manipulation. The first case is a 41 years old woman who developed a vertebro-basilar stroke 48 h after cervical manipulation. The second case represents a 68 years old woman who presented a neuropraxic injury of both radial nerves after three sessions of spinal manipulation. The last case is a 34 years old man who developed a cervical epidural haematoma after a chiropractic treatment for neck pain. In all three cases there were criteria to consider a causality relation between the neurological adverse events and the chiropractic manipulation. The described serious adverse events promptly recommend the implementation of a risk alert system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liliana Olim Gouveia
- Department of Neurology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Av. Prof Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hawk C, Khorsan R, Lisi AJ, Ferrance RJ, Evans MW. Chiropractic care for nonmusculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review with implications for whole systems research. J Altern Complement Med 2007; 13:491-512. [PMID: 17604553 DOI: 10.1089/acm.2007.7088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES (1) To evaluate the evidence on the effect of chiropractic care, rather than spinal manipulation only, on patients with nonmusculoskeletal conditions; and (2) to identify shortcomings in the evidence base on this topic, from a Whole Systems Research perspective. DESIGN Systematic review. METHODS Databases included were PubMed, Ovid, Mantis, Index to Chiropractic Literature, and CINAHL. Search restrictions were human subjects, peer-reviewed journal, English language, and publication before May 2005. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were evaluated using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) and Jadad checklists; a checklist developed from the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) guidelines; and one developed by the authors to evaluate studies in terms of Whole Systems Research (WSR) considerations. RESULTS The search yielded 179 papers addressing 50 different nonmusculoskeletal conditions. There were 122 case reports or case series, 47 experimental designs, including 14 RCTs, 9 systematic reviews, and 1 a large cohort study. The 14 RCTs addressed 10 conditions. Six RCTs were rated "high" on the 3 conventional checklists; one of these 6 was rated "high" in terms of WSR considerations. CONCLUSIONS (1) Adverse effects should be routinely reported. For the few studies that did report, adverse effects of spinal manipulation for all ages and conditions were rare, transient, and not severe. (2) Evidence from controlled studies and usual practice supports chiropractic care (the entire clinical encounter) as providing benefit to patients with asthma, cervicogenic vertigo, and infantile colic. Evidence was promising for potential benefit of manual procedures for children with otitis media and elderly patients with pneumonia. (3) The RCT design is not necessarily incompatible with WSR. RCTs could improve generalizability by basing protocols on usual practice. (4) Case reports could contribute more to WSR by increasing their emphasis on patient characteristics and patient-based outcomes. (5) Chiropractic investigators, practitioners, and funding agencies should increase their attention to observational designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Hawk
- Cleveland Chiropractic College, Kansas City, Missouri 64131, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Pollentier A, Langworthy JM. The scope of chiropractic practice: A survey of chiropractors in the UK. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clch.2007.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
40
|
Cox G, Thomson NC, Rubin AS, Niven RM, Corris PA, Siersted HC, Olivenstein R, Pavord ID, McCormack D, Chaudhuri R, Miller JD, Laviolette M. Asthma control during the year after bronchial thermoplasty. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1327-37. [PMID: 17392302 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa064707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 379] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bronchial thermoplasty is a bronchoscopic procedure to reduce the mass of airway smooth muscle and attenuate bronchoconstriction. We examined the effect of bronchial thermoplasty on the control of moderate or severe persistent asthma. METHODS We randomly assigned 112 subjects who had been treated with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists (LABA) and in whom asthma control was impaired when the LABA were withdrawn to either bronchial thermoplasty or a control group. The primary outcome was the frequency of mild exacerbations, calculated during three scheduled 2-week periods of abstinence from LABA at 3, 6, and 12 months. Airflow, airway responsiveness, asthma symptoms, the number of symptom-free days, use of rescue medication, and scores on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) were also assessed. RESULTS The mean rate of mild exacerbations, as compared with baseline, was reduced in the bronchial-thermoplasty group but was unchanged in the control group (change in frequency per subject per week, -0.16+/-0.37 vs. 0.04+/-0.29; P=0.005). At 12 months, there were significantly greater improvements in the bronchial-thermoplasty group than in the control group in the morning peak expiratory flow (39.3+/-48.7 vs. 8.5+/-44.2 liters per minute), scores on the AQLQ (1.3+/-1.0 vs. 0.6+/-1.1) and ACQ (reduction, 1.2+/-1.0 vs. 0.5+/-1.0), the percentage of symptom-free days (40.6+/-39.7 vs. 17.0+/-37.9), and symptom scores (reduction, 1.9+/-2.1 vs. 0.7+/-2.5) while fewer puffs of rescue medication were required. Values for airway responsiveness and forced expiratory volume in 1 second did not differ significantly between the two groups. Adverse events immediately after treatment were more common in the bronchial-thermoplasty group than in the control group but were similar during the period from 6 weeks to 12 months after treatment. CONCLUSIONS Bronchial thermoplasty in subjects with moderate or severe asthma results in an improvement in asthma control. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00214526 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerard Cox
- St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Boutron I, Guittet L, Estellat C, Moher D, Hróbjartsson A, Ravaud P. Reporting methods of blinding in randomized trials assessing nonpharmacological treatments. PLoS Med 2007; 4:e61. [PMID: 17311468 PMCID: PMC1800311 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 237] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2006] [Accepted: 12/22/2006] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Blinding is a cornerstone of treatment evaluation. Blinding is more difficult to obtain in trials assessing nonpharmacological treatment and frequently relies on "creative" (nonstandard) methods. The purpose of this study was to systematically describe the strategies used to obtain blinding in a sample of randomized controlled trials of nonpharmacological treatment. METHODS AND FINDINGS We systematically searched in Medline and the Cochrane Methodology Register for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing nonpharmacological treatment with blinding, published during 2004 in high-impact-factor journals. Data were extracted using a standardized extraction form. We identified 145 articles, with the method of blinding described in 123 of the reports. Methods of blinding of participants and/or health care providers and/or other caregivers concerned mainly use of sham procedures such as simulation of surgical procedures, similar attention-control interventions, or a placebo with a different mode of administration for rehabilitation or psychotherapy. Trials assessing devices reported various placebo interventions such as use of sham prosthesis, identical apparatus (e.g., identical but inactivated machine or use of activated machine with a barrier to block the treatment), or simulation of using a device. Blinding participants to the study hypothesis was also an important method of blinding. The methods reported for blinding outcome assessors relied mainly on centralized assessment of paraclinical examinations, clinical examinations (i.e., use of video, audiotape, photography), or adjudications of clinical events. CONCLUSIONS This study classifies blinding methods and provides a detailed description of methods that could overcome some barriers of blinding in clinical trials assessing nonpharmacological treatment, and provides information for readers assessing the quality of results of such trials.
Collapse
|
42
|
Lawrence DJ, Meeker WC. Chiropractic and CAM utilization: a descriptive review. CHIROPRACTIC & OSTEOPATHY 2007; 15:2. [PMID: 17241465 PMCID: PMC1784103 DOI: 10.1186/1746-1340-15-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2006] [Accepted: 01/22/2007] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a descriptive review of the scientific literature examining use rates of modalities and procedures used by CAM clinicians to manage chronic LBP and other conditions DATA SOURCES A literature of PubMed and MANTIS was performed using the key terms Chiropractic; Low Back Pain; Utilization Rate; Use Rate; Complementary and Alternative Medicine; and Health Services in various combinations. DATA SELECTION A total of 137 papers were selected, based upon including information about chiropractic utilization, CAM utilization and low back pain and other conditions. DATA SYNTHESIS Information was extracted from each paper addressing use of chiropractic and CAM, and is summarized in tabular form. RESULTS Thematic analysis of the paper topics indicated that there were 5 functional areas covered by the literature: back pain papers, general chiropractic papers, insurance-related papers, general CAM-related papers; and worker's compensation papers. CONCLUSION Studies looking at chiropractic utilization demonstrate that the rates vary, but generally fall into a range from around 6% to 12% of the population, most of whom seek chiropractic care for low back pain and not for organic disease or visceral dysfunction. CAM is itself used by people suffering from a variety of conditions, though it is often used not as a primary intervention, but rather as an additional form of care. CAM and chiropractic often offer lower costs for comparable results compared to conventional medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana J Lawrence
- Research Department, Palmer College of Chiropractic, 1000 Brady Street, Davenport, IA 52803 USA
| | - William C Meeker
- President, Palmer College of Chiropractic West, 90 E. Tasman Avenue, San Jose, CA 95134 USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Vohra S, Johnston BC, Cramer K, Humphreys K. Adverse events associated with pediatric spinal manipulation: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2007; 119:e275-83. [PMID: 17178922 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-1392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal manipulation is a noninvasive manual procedure applied to specific body tissues with therapeutic intent. Although spinal manipulation is commonly used in children, there is limited understanding of the pediatric risk estimates. OBJECTIVE Our goal was to systematically identify and synthesize available data on adverse events associated with pediatric spinal manipulation. METHODS A comprehensive search was performed of 8 major electronic databases (eg, Medline, AMED, MANTIS) from inception to June 2004 irrespective of language. Reports were included if they (1) were a primary investigation of spinal manipulation (eg, observation studies, controlled trials, surveys), (2) included a study population of children who were aged 18 years or younger, and (3) reported data on adverse events. Data were summarized to demonstrate the nature and severity of adverse events that may result rather than their incidence. RESULTS Thirteen studies (2 randomized trials, 11 observational reports) were identified for inclusion. We identified 14 cases of direct adverse events involving neurologic or musculoskeletal events. Nine cases involved serious adverse events (eg, subarachnoidal hemorrhage, paraplegia), 2 involved moderately adverse events that required medical attention (eg, severe headache), and 3 involved minor adverse events (eg, midback soreness). Another 20 cases of indirect adverse events involved delayed diagnosis (eg, diabetes, neuroblastoma) and/or inappropriate provision of spinal manipulation for serious medical conditions (ie, meningitis, rhabdomyosarcoma). CONCLUSIONS Serious adverse events may be associated with pediatric spinal manipulation; neither causation nor incidence rates can be inferred from observational data. Conduct of a prospective population-based active surveillance study is required to properly assess the possibility of rare, yet serious, adverse events as a result of spinal manipulation on pediatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunita Vohra
- CARE Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E1.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Haas M, Bronfort G, Evans RL. Chiropractic Clinical Research: Progress and Recommendations. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006; 29:695-706. [PMID: 17142164 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2005] [Revised: 04/27/2006] [Accepted: 04/30/2006] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this white paper is to help inform the chiropractic clinical research agenda with a focus on the United States. METHODS AND DISCUSSION The recommendations and action items from 2 previous articles published in 1997 are discussed within the context of 3 broad topics: research culture, research infrastructure, and clinical research studies. Progress made toward the action items in these areas is summarized. A summary of findings is presented of the most influential clinical research studies during the past decade performed by or with major contributions by chiropractic investigators. In light of the current evidence and previous recommendations, new clinical research recommendations are proposed. CONCLUSIONS Based on the assessment of the scientific literature and research currently underway, it is evident that members of the chiropractic research community have made important progress in becoming active players in the clinical research arena. During the past decade, the work of chiropractic researchers has contributed substantially to the amount and quality of the evidence for or against spinal manipulation in the management of low back pain, neck pain, headache, and other conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell Haas
- Center for Outcomes Studies, Western States Chiropractic College, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hawk C, Rupert RL, Colonvega M, Boyd J, Hall S. Comparison of Bioenergetic Synchronization Technique and Customary Chiropractic Care for Older Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006; 29:540-9. [PMID: 16949943 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2005] [Revised: 10/17/2005] [Accepted: 10/31/2005] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to compare the clinical outcomes of 2 approaches to chiropractic care for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Included were the approach most commonly used by doctors of chiropractic (diversified technique spinal manipulation) and a nonmanipulative mind-body approach (Bioenergetic Synchronization Technique). This clinical experiment tested the null hypothesis that there is no clinically or statistically significant difference in effect between the 2 approaches. METHODS The study was conducted in the research clinic of the Parker College of Chiropractic. Patients were initially recruited by contacting a previously developed pool used for studies related to fall prevention in the elderly. Eighty-one patients (74 females; median age, 66 years) were enrolled and 78 (96%) completed the study. The primary end point was the end of a 3-week nontreatment interval after a 4-week treatment period. An intention-to-treat analysis was used; all patients who completed assessments were included whether or not they were compliant with the treatment protocol. A sample size of 55 per group was estimated to be necessary to detect a clinically significant (6-point) between-group difference in the Pain Disability Index (PDI). The primary outcome, the mean between-group difference between PDI scores at visit 1 and the exit visit, was tested with a 2-tailed t test for independent samples. RESULTS Mean improvements in the PDI from visit 1 to the exit visit were 6.9 points in the Bioenergetic Synchronization Technique group (n = 40) and 6.4 in the diversified technique group (n = 38); the between-groups difference was not statistically or clinically significant (95% confidence interval, -4.7 to 5.8). CONCLUSIONS For this particular group of patients, both groups demonstrated similar improvement scores on the PDI; the study's null hypothesis was not rejected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Hawk
- Cleveland Chiropractic College, 6401 Rockhill Road, Kansas City, MO 64131, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rowe DE, Feise RJ, Crowther ER, Grod JP, Menke JM, Goldsmith CH, Stoline MR, Souza TA, Kambach B. Chiropractic manipulation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a pilot study. CHIROPRACTIC & OSTEOPATHY 2006; 14:15. [PMID: 16923185 PMCID: PMC1560145 DOI: 10.1186/1746-1340-14-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2006] [Accepted: 08/21/2006] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remains the most common deforming orthopedic condition in children. Increasingly, both adults and children are seeking complementary and alternative therapy, including chiropractic treatment, for a wide variety of health concerns. The scientific evidence supporting the use chiropractic intervention is inadequate. The purpose of this study was to conduct a pilot study and explore issues of safety, patient recruitment and compliance, treatment standardization, sham treatment refinement, inter-professional cooperation, quality assurance, and outcome measure selection. METHODS Six patients participated in this 6-month study, 5 of whom were female. One female was braced. The mean age of these patients was 14 years, and the mean Cobb angle was 22.2 degrees. The study design was a randomized controlled clinical trial with two independent and blinded observers. Three patients were treated by standard medical care (observation or brace treatment), two were treated with standard medical care plus chiropractic manipulation, and one was treated with standard medical care plus sham manipulation. The primary outcome measure was Cobb, and the psychosocial measure was Scoliosis Quality of Life Index. RESULTS Orthopedic surgeons and chiropractors were easily recruited and worked cooperatively throughout the trial. Patient recruitment and compliance was good. Chiropractic treatments were safely employed, and research protocols were successful. CONCLUSION Overall, our pilot study showed the viability for a larger randomized trial. This pilot confirms the strength of existing protocols with amendments for use in a full randomized controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial has been assigned an international standard randomized controlled trial number by Current Controlled Trials, Ltd. http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn/. The number is ISRCTN41221647.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dale E Rowe
- Kalamazoo Center of Medical Studies, Michigan State University, 1000 Oakland Drive, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA
| | - Ronald J Feise
- Institute of Evidence-Based Chiropractic, 6252 Rookery Road, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Edward R Crowther
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, USA
| | - Jaroslaw P Grod
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, USA
| | - J Michael Menke
- Program in Integrative Medicine, University of Arizona, 1503 East University Boulevard, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Michael R Stoline
- Western Michigan University, 1903 West Michigan Avenue, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA
| | - Thomas A Souza
- Palmer-West College of Chiropractic, 90 East Tasman Drive, San Jose, California, USA
| | - Brandon Kambach
- Kalamazoo Center of Medical Studies, Michigan State University, 1000 Oakland Drive, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Passalacqua G, Bousquet PJ, Carlsen KH, Kemp J, Lockey RF, Niggemann B, Pawankar R, Price D, Bousquet J. ARIA update: I--Systematic review of complementary and alternative medicine for rhinitis and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 117:1054-62. [PMID: 16675332 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.12.1308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2005] [Revised: 12/12/2005] [Accepted: 12/12/2005] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Complementary-alternative medicines are extensively used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma, but evidence-based recommendations are lacking. To provide evidence-based recommendations, the literature was searched by using MedLine and the Cochrane Library to March 2005 (Key words: Asthma [OR] Rhinitis, [AND] Complementary [OR] Alternative Medicine, [OR] Herbal, [OR] Acupuncture, [OR] Homeopathy, [OR] Alternative Treatment). Randomized trials, preferably double-blind and published in English, were selected. The articles were evaluated by a panel of experts. Quality of reporting was assessed by using the scale validated by Jadad. The methodology of clinical trials with complementary-alternative medicine was frequently inadequate. Meta-analyses provided no clear evidence for the efficacy of acupuncture in rhinitis and asthma. Some positive results were described with homeopathy in good-quality trials in rhinitis, but a number of negative studies were also found. Therefore it is not possible to provide evidence-based recommendations for homeopathy in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, and further trials are needed. A limited number of studies of herbal remedies showed some efficacy in rhinitis and asthma, but the studies were too few to make recommendations. There are also unresolved safety concerns. Therapeutic efficacy of complementary-alternative treatments for rhinitis and asthma is not supported by currently available evidence.
Collapse
|
48
|
Vernon H, MacAdam K, Marshall V, Pion M, Sadowska M. Validation of a sham manipulative procedure for the cervical spine for use in clinical trials. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006; 28:662-6. [PMID: 16326235 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2005] [Revised: 07/21/2005] [Accepted: 07/25/2005] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a sham manipulation procedure for the cervical spine for use in randomized clinical trials of cervical disorders. METHODS A single-group, single-intervention study design was used. Adult neck pain subjects underwent a screening examination that included palpation for a site of cervical spine joint dysfunction. Eligible subjects underwent measurements of regional cervical ranges of motion as well as pressure algometry (tenderness) at the site of cervical joint dysfunction. Subjects were instructed that they would receive one of several types of manipulative procedures. A newly developed sham manipulation was delivered once. Subjects were then remeasured for ranges of motion and tenderness. They were asked if they had experienced any pain during the procedure, if they had experienced a "cavitation" sound, and if they thought that the procedure they received was a "real" manipulation. Finally, they were debriefed as to the deception involved in this study. A prior level of 65% was set for endorsement that the procedure was a real manipulation. Changes in pre-post measures of ranges of motion and tenderness were analyzed descriptively for clinically important differences. RESULTS Twenty eligible subjects were included (12 males, 8 females) with an average age of 30.4 (2.8) years. Twelve of the subjects were not students, with 3 of these having no prior experience with chiropractic treatment; 8 were students. Of the total sample (N = 19), 8 (42.1%) indicated that the procedure was a "real adjustment"; of the 12 nonstudents, 8 (58.3%) indicated similarly. None of the procedures in the final sample resulted in a cavitation, and none of the subjects registered the procedure as painful. None of the measures for ranges of motion or tenderness showed clinically important changes. CONCLUSIONS The sham cervical manipulation studied here appears to approximate the necessary features of a placebo maneuver in that it is perceived by a majority of nonstudent neck pain subjects to be a real manipulation, although it does not produce any important change in cervical status. The small sample size of nonstudent participants precludes a strong recommendation for this procedure at this time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard Vernon
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J Gleberzon
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1.
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
|