The interval between pregnancies and preeclampsia

Association of family history with incidence and gestational hypertension outcomes of preeclampsia

Background

Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia are hypertensive disorders related to pregnancy that can cause maternal morbidity and fetal growth retardation. The association of these disorders with family history remains unclear.

Objectives

To examine the degree of family aggregation of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension in Taiwan.

Methods

The study was conducted using the data from the National Health Insurance Database of Taiwan. Delivery events in Taiwan from 1999 to 2013 were collected. Preeclampsia was identified based on the hospital diagnosis of index delivery. The family aggregation pattern of preeclampsia was assessed and analyzed using the relationship registered in the database with the patients.

Results

A total of 60,314 preeclampsia events were identified among 4,091,641 deliveries, accounting for 1.5% of the cohort. The incidence of preeclampsia increased with maternal age. A total of 768 preeclampsia events occurred in mothers who had a sororal history of preeclampsia (n = 20,704), accounting for 1.3% of all preeclampsia events (n = 60,314). Mothers who had a sororal history of preeclampsia had a relative risk (RR) of 2.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.41-2.80) for preeclampsia compared with mothers who did not have a sororal history of preeclampsia. The RR for gestational hypertension was 2.79 (95% CI: 2.36-3.3) in mothers with a positive sororal history of gestational hypertension.

Conclusions

Having a sororal history of preeclampsia was a strong risk factor for preeclampsia and gestational hypertension in mothers in Taiwan. The pattern of family aggregation was similar at all maternal ages.

Validation of the 34-week gestation as definition of late onset preeclampsia: Testing different cutoffs from 30 to 37 weeks on a population-based cohort of 1700 preeclamptics

INTRODUCTION

Early onset preeclampsia (EOP) and late onset preeclampsia (LOP) have been differentiated with a cut-point of ≤34 weeks. This classical definition has never been examined with respect to maternal characteristics by different gestational age cut-points. We examined maternal characteristics in a population-based cohort of 1736 preeclamptic deliveries at different gestational age cut-points from 30 to 37 weeks (CO30 to CO37).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighteen-year observational population-based historical cohort study (2001-2018). All consecutive births delivered at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hospitalier Sud Reunion's maternity. Standardized epidemiological perinatal database.

RESULTS

The incidence of EOP was lower in adolescents (1.8% vs 3.5%, odds ratio [OR] 0.50, P = .17). Conversely, the odds of LOP was increased for women over 35, beginning at C030 (OR 1.13, P = .02) and this effect (OR = 1.2) was still detectable at C037 (P = .06). Among primigravid women, the incidence of EOP was lower than LOP (OR ranging from 0.71 to 0.82 for different CO). Conversely, the incidence of LOP was higher (adjusted OR about 2.7 [CO30-CO34] with a rise to 3.3 at CO37 (P < .001). Women with EOP had a lower body mass index (BMI) as compared with LOP at CO34 and CO37. The adjusted OR (per 5 kg/m² increment) declined from 1.06 to 1.03 from CO30 to C037 in EOP women. Conversely, for LOP, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) increased from 1.04 to 1.06 from CO30 to CO37 (P < .001). Gestational diabetes mellitus was not associated with LOP at any cut-off (aOR 1.07, NS) but was protective against EOP from CO30 to CO34 (aOR 0.42, 0.61 and 0.73, respectively, P < .001). This protective effect disappeared at CO37. Chronic hypertension and history of preeclampsia were both EOP and LOP risks but with a much stronger effect for EOP (chronic hypertension: aOR 6.0-6.5, history of preeclampsia: aOR 12-17).

CONCLUSIONS

The 34th week of gestation appears to provide a reasonable cut-point to differentiate between EOP and LOP. Additional research is needed to better describe the possible differences in the pathophysiology of these different phenotypes.

Does the fetal genotype affect maternal physiology during pregnancy?

Conventional wisdom states that associations between fetal growth and diseases in pregnancy, such as pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and gestational diabetes (GDM), result from effects of the mother's genotype or environment acting on her physiology which subsequently affect the fetus. However, recent evidence from human mothers carrying macrosomic offspring with Beckwith Wiedemann syndrome and pregnant mice carrying p57(kip2)-null offspring suggest that variation in the fetal genome can modify maternal physiology to increase fetal nutrient delivery and optimise growth. These are some of the first documented examples of such effects, whereby the genome of one individual directly affects the physiology of another related individual from the same species. We propose that this mechanism is involved in the aetiology of PIH and GDM.