Surgical ventricular reconstruction

Virtual peer-delivered memory intervention: a single-case experimental design in an adolescent with chronic memory impairment

BACKGROUND

Children and adolescents with chronic memory impairment may develop coping strategies that enable functioning, yet these often remain undetectable using traditional psychometric measures. Personalized intervention studies that promote the use of such strategies designed specifically for use by this young cohort are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of a novel virtual reality peer-delivered memory intervention on the everyday functioning and well-being of SE, a 17-year-old female with a history of chronic verbal memory issues, impaired autobiographical event recall and elevated mood symptoms.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A single-case ABA experimental design study was used to assess change.

METHODS

Following initial baseline assessment using objective neuropsychological and subjective functional questionnaires and intervention training, case SE used the intervention daily for 3 weeks before repeating key outcome measures.

RESULTS

Using non-overlap of all pairs and qualitative feedback analysis, the results revealed a significant increase in event recall and self-reported positive changes to levels of everyday functioning.

CONCLUSION

Supporting autobiographical event recall and prospective memory via a virtual peer-delivered intervention may lead to reduction in cognitive load, and benefit overall well-being and everyday functioning.

The impact of volume reduction on early and long-term outcomes in surgical ventricular restoration for severe heart failure

BACKGROUND

Recent published results suggest no additive benefit to surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) when combined with coronary artery bypass grafting. However, there may still be a subgroup of patients with severe heart failure who can benefit from this procedure. We reviewed our institutional experience with SVR to determine early and late outcomes based on volume reduction.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our SVR patients (January 2002 to April 2008) with follow-up to March 2009. Baseline comorbidities, operative data, and postoperative outcomes were assessed by chart review, phone calls, and mailings. Survival was modeled using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, myocardial perfusion scans, and echocardiography assessed cardiac function, candidacy for SVR, and volume reduction.

RESULTS

We reviewed 87 consecutive SVR patients (69 men). Mean age at operation was 61.1 years. Preoperatively, all patients had congestive heart failure, with 80 (92%) at New York Heart Association III/IV. All patients underwent preoperative viability studies. Three-vessel occlusion exceeding 50% was present in 69 (79%). After SVR, ejection fraction improved from 0.236 to 0.332 (p<0.001). Preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in 26 patients (30.0%) showed a 30.8% reduction in left ventricular end systolic volume index. At follow-up, 51 of 66 (77%) improved to New York Heart Association I/II. One intraoperative death occurred. Preoperative left ventricular end systolic volume index of 80 to 120 was associated with improved survival (73% at 3 years).

CONCLUSIONS

SVR is a surgical option for appropriately selected patients with severe congestive heart failure. In these high-risk patients, SVR successfully increased ejection fraction and decreased symptoms. A left ventricular end systolic volume index of 80 to 120 may be the ideal range for SVR procedures.

STICH (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure) trial enrollment

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of enrolling site location and enrollment performance on the generalizability of STICH (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure) trial results.

BACKGROUND

The international STICH trial seeks to define the role of cardiac surgery for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics of 2,136 randomized STICH patients were entered into a multivariate equation created using the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Diseases to predict their 5-year risk for death without cardiac surgery. Patients ordered by increasing predicted risk were assigned to 1 of 32 risk at randomization (RAR) groups created to share one-thirty-second of total predicted deaths. Numbers of patients sharing the same RAR group were compared between higher and lower enrolling site groupings and for countries tending to enroll high- or low-risk patients.

RESULTS

Country of enrollment was a stronger determinant of risk diversity than site enrollment performance among patients enrolled at 127 sites in 26 countries. Mean RAR differences among countries ranged from 9.4 (Singapore) to 18.6 (Germany). However, 1,614 of 2,136 patients (76%) from countries enrolling lower-risk patients shared the same RAR group with patients from countries enrolling higher-risk patients. Baseline characteristics responsible for risk differences of patients enrolled in the 2 country groupings were sufficiently similar to exert little influence on clinical decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

STICH randomized patients are characterized by a continuous spectrum of risk, without discordant dominance from any site or country. Clinical site diversity promises to enhance the generalization of STICH trial results to a broad population of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. (Comparison of Surgical and Medical Treatment for Congestive Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease; NCT00023595).

Clinical characteristics of patients undergoing surgical ventricular reconstruction by choice and by randomization

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to confirm the generalizability of the conclusions of the STICH (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure) trial.

BACKGROUND

Surgical ventricular reconstruction (SVR) added to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) did not decrease death or cardiac hospitalization in STICH patients randomized to CABG with (n = 501) or without (n = 499) SVR.

METHODS

Baseline clinical characteristics of 1,000 STICH SVR hypothesis patients and 1,036 STICH-eligible Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) National Cardiac Database patients undergoing CABG plus SVR were entered into a multivariate model equation to predict a mortality that placed these 2,036 patients in 1 of 32 risk at randomization (RAR) groups. The number of patients in each RAR group profiled the risk of STICH treatment arms and of STICH and STS STICH-eligible patients.

RESULTS

That 85% of the 1,000 STICH patients known to have no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 treatment arms shared the same RAR group suggests that the RAR methodology has sufficient accuracy to compare RAR profiles of STICH and STS patients. RAR group was shared by 1,522 of 2,036 STICH and STS STICH-eligible patients (75%) who underwent CABG plus SVR. Differences in baseline characteristics responsible for more low-risk STICH patients and more high-risk STS patients were modest. Cox proportional hazard ratios of 1,000 STICH patients in 3 RAR groups suggested by STICH and STS RAR differences showed no differential treatment effect on survival across the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The STICH conclusion of no benefit from adding SVR to CABG applies to a broad spectrum of CABG-eligible patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. (Comparison of Surgical and Medical Treatment for Congestive Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease; NCT00023595).

Current controversies in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction is a fascinating and multifaceted condition that has provoked enormous debate and a wealth of mechanistic studies. Controversies exist with regard to its nomenclature. If its nomenclature is questioned, one can be certain the pathogenesis is ill understood. If the pathogenesis is disputed, the diagnosis becomes difficult and inconsistent. These diagnostic challenges result in inappropriate recruitment to clinical trials. Therefore, the trials may be underpowered and difficult to interpret. This paper examines contemporary theories of heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction, clarifies the controversies and attempts to resolve the divergences of opinion.