Adaptive Servo-Ventilation for Central Sleep Apnea in Heart Failure

Chronic Effects of Adaptive Servo-Ventilation Therapy on Mortality and the Urgent Rehospitalization Rate in Patients Experiencing Recurrent Admissions for Heart Failure - A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study (SAVIOR-L)

BACKGROUND

This study investigated whether the chronic use of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) reduces all-cause mortality and the rate of urgent rehospitalization in patients with heart failure (HF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This multicenter prospective observational study enrolled patients hospitalized for HF in Japan between 2019 and 2020 who were treated either with or without ASV therapy. Of 845 patients, 110 (13%) received chronic ASV at hospital discharge. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and urgent rehospitalization for HF, and was observed in 272 patients over a 1-year follow-up. Following 1:3 sequential propensity score matching, 384 patients were included in the subsequent analysis. The median time to the primary outcome was significantly shorter in the ASV than in non-ASV group (19.7 vs. 34.4 weeks; P=0.013). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the all-cause mortality event-free rate between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic use of ASV did not impact all-cause mortality in patients experiencing recurrent admissions for HF.

Abnormal Sleep-Related Breathing Related to Heart Failure

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF). Untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and central sleep apnea (CSA) in patients with HF are associated with worse outcomes. Detailed sleep history along with polysomnography (PSG) should be conducted if SDB is suspected in patients with HF. First line of treatment is the optimization of medical therapy for HF and if symptoms persist despite optimization of the treatment, positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy will be started to treat SDB. At present, there is limited evidence to prescribe any drugs for treating CSA in patients with HF. There is limited evidence for the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) in improving mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). There is a need to perform well-designed studies to identify different phenotypes of CSA/OSA in patients with HF and to determine which phenotype responds to which therapy. Results of ongoing trials, ADVENT-HF, and LOFT-HF are eagerly awaited to shed more light on the management of CSA in patients with HF. Until then the management of SDB in patients with HF is limited due to the lack of evidence and guidance for treating SDB in patients with HF.

Adaptive Servo-Ventilation as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy for Chronic Heart Failure

The introduction of new therapeutics for patients with chronic heart failure, including sacubitril/valsartan, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and ivabradine, in addition to beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, lends an opportunity for significant clinical risk reduction compared to what was available just one decade ago. Further clinical options are needed, however, for patients with residual clinical congestion refractory to these therapies. Adaptive servo-ventilation is a novel therapeutic option to address significant clinical volume in cases resistant to medical therapy. The aggregate benefit of these additional therapeutic strategies in addition to foundational medical therapy may be a promising option in the selected candidates who do not achieve acceptable clinical and quality-of-life improvements with oral medical therapy alone. Now is the era to reconsider the implication of an adaptive servo-ventilation-therapy-incorporated medical therapeutic strategy for patients with congestive heart failure.

Central sleep apnea and atrial fibrillation: A review on pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic implications

Precipitating factors and chronic diseases associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) are detailed in the literature. Emerging evidence over the last several decades suggests a potential causal relationship between central sleep apnea (CSA) and AF. Mechanisms including apnea-induced hypoxia with intermittent arousal, fluctuating levels of carbon dioxide, enhanced sympathetic/neurohormonal activation and oxidative stress causing inflammation have been implicated as etiologic causes of AF within this subpopulation. CSA affects the efficacy of pharmacologic and catheter-based antiarrhythmic treatments, which is why treating CSA prior to these interventions may lead to lower rates of AF. Subsequently, a reduction in the AF burden with transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) has become a topic of interest. The present review describes the relationship between these conditions, pathophysiologic mechanisms implicating the role of CSA in development of AF, and emerging therapeutic interventions.

Patterns of adaptive servo-ventilation settings in a real-life multicenter study: pay attention to volume! : Adaptive servo-ventilation settings in real-life conditions

Backgrounds

To explain the excess cardiovascular mortality observed in the SERVE-HF study, it was hypothesized that the high-pressure ASV default settings used lead to inappropriate ventilation, cascading negative consequences (i.e. not only pro-arrythmogenic effects through metabolic/electrolyte abnormalities, but also lower cardiac output). The aims of this study are: i) to describe ASV-settings for long-term ASV-populations in real-life conditions; ii) to describe the associated minute-ventilations (MV) and therapeutic pressures for servo-controlled-flow versus servo-controlled-volume devices (ASV-F Philips®-devices versus ASV-V ResMed®-devices).

Methods

The OTRLASV-study is a cross-sectional, 5-centre study including patients who underwent ASV-treatment for at least 1 year. The eight participating clinicians were free to adjust ASV settings, which were compared among i) initial diagnosed sleep-disordered-breathing (SBD) groups (Obstructive-Sleep-Apnea (OSA), Central-Sleep-Apnea (CSA), Treatment-Emergent-Central-Sleep-Apnea (TECSA)), and ii) unsupervised groups (k-means clusters). To generate these clusters, baseline and follow-up variables were used (age, sex, body mass index (BMI), initial diagnosed Obstructive-Apnea-Index, initial diagnosed Central-Apnea-Index, Continuous-Positive-Airway-Pressure used before ASV treatment, presence of cardiopathy, and presence of a reduced left-ventricular-ejection-fraction (LVEF)). ASV-data were collected using the manufacturer’s software for 6 months.

Results

One hundred seventy-seven patients (87.57% male) were analysed with a median (IQ_25–75) initial Apnea-Hypopnea-Index of 50 (38–62)/h, an ASV-treatment duration of 2.88 (1.76–4.96) years, 61.58% treated with an ASV-V. SDB groups did not differ in ASV settings, MV or therapeutic pressures. In contrast, the five generated k-means clusters did (generally described as follows: (C1) male-TECSA-cardiopathy, (C2) male-mostly-CSA-cardiopathy, (C3) male-mostly-TECSA-no cardiopathy, (C4) female-mostly-elevated BMI-TECSA-cardiopathy, (C5) male-mostly-OSA-low-LVEF). Of note, the male-mostly-OSA-low-LVEF-cluster-5 had significantly lower fixed end-expiratory-airway-pressure (EPAP) settings versus C1 (p = 0.029) and C4 (p = 0.007). Auto-EPAP usage was higher in the male-mostly-TECSA-no cardiopathy-cluster-3 versus C1 (p = 0.006) and C2 (p < 0.001). MV differences between ASV-F (p = 0.002) and ASV-V (p < 0.001) were not homogenously distributed across clusters, suggesting specific cluster and ASV-algorithm interactions. Individual ASV-data suggest that the hyperventilation risk is not related to the cluster nor the ASV-monitoring type.

Conclusions

Real-life ASV settings are associated with combinations of baseline and follow-up variables wherein cardiological variables remain clinically meaningful. At the patient level, a hyperventilation risk exists regardless of cluster or ASV-monitoring type, spotlighting a future role of MV-telemonitoring in the interest of patient-safety.

Trial registration

The OTRLASV study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02429986). 1 April 2015.

OSA and Neurocognitive Impairment in Children With Congenital Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) have an increased risk of neurocognitive impairment. No prior studies have evaluated the role of OSA, which is associated with neurocognitive impairment in children without CHD.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is OSA is associated with neurocognitive impairment in children with CHD?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Children aged 6 to 17 years with corrected moderate to complex CHD without syndromes that may affect neurocognition were recruited from the pediatric cardiology clinic. Participants underwent home sleep testing and neurocognitive testing, including a validated Intellectual Quotient (IQ) test as well as validated tests of memory (Paired Associates Learning test), executive function (Intra-Extra Dimensional set shift test), and attention (Simple Reaction Test) from the CANTAB neurocognitive testing battery.

RESULTS

Complete results were available for 30 children. Seventeen children (57%) were found to have OSA. Total IQ was markedly lower in children with CHD and comorbid OSA compared with children with CHD without comorbid OSA (mean, 86 ± 12 vs 98 ± 11; P = .01). Children with CHD and OSA did significantly worse on the Paired Associates Learning test, with a median of eight total errors (interquartile range [IQR], 2.25-15) compared with children with CHD without OSA (median total errors, 2, IQR, 1-8; P = .02).

INTERPRETATION

Children with CHD and comorbid OSA have impaired neurocognition compared with children with CHD without comorbid OSA. OSA may be a reversible cause of neurocognitive impairment in children with CHD. Further research is needed to evaluate the effects of OSA treatment on neurocognitive impairment in children with CHD.

Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea: A Pooled Cohort Analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Early evidence with transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) demonstrates improved disease severity and quality of life (QOL) in patients with central sleep apnea (CSA). The goal of this analysis is to evaluate the complete prospective experience with PNS in order to better characterize its efficacy and safety, including in patients with concomitant heart failure (HF).

METHODS

Using pooled individual data from the pilot (n = 57) and pivotal (n = 151) studies of the remedē System in patients with predominant moderate to severe CSA, we evaluated 12-month safety and 6- and 12-month effectiveness based on polysomnography data, QOL, and cardiac function.

RESULTS

Among 208 combined patients (June 2010 to May 2015), a remedē device implant was successful in 197 patients (95%), 50/57 pilot study patients (88%) and 147/151 pivotal trial patients (97%). The pooled cohort included patients with CSA of various etiologies, and 141 (68%) had concomitant HF. PNS reduced apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) at 6 months by a median of -22.6 episodes/h (25th and 75th percentile; -38.6 and -8.4, respectively) (median 58% reduction from baseline, P < .001). Improvement in sleep variables was maintained through 12 months of follow-up. In patients with HF and ejection fraction ≤ 45%, PNS was associated with improvement in systolic function from 27.0% (23.3, 36.0) to 31.1% (24.0, 41.5) at 12 months (P = .003). In the entire cohort, improvement in QOL was concordant with amelioration of sleep measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Transvenous PNS significantly improves CSA severity, sleep quality, ventricular function, and QOL regardless of HF status. Improvements, which are independent of patient compliance, are sustained at 1 year and are associated with acceptable safety.

Phrenic nerve stimulation to treat patients with central sleep apnoea and heart failure

AIMS

The presence of central sleep apnoea (CSA) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF). The aim of this analysis was to evaluate if using phrenic nerve stimulation to treat CSA in patients with CSA and HF was associated with changes in HF-specific metrics.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients randomized in the remedē System Pivotal Trial and identified at baseline with HF were included (n = 96). Effectiveness data from treatment and former control groups were pooled based on months since therapy activation. Changes from baseline to 6 and 12 months in sleep metrics, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, patient global assessment health-related quality of life, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), and echocardiographic parameters are reported. HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and the composite of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death within 6 months are reported by the original randomized group assignment for safety assessment. Sleep metrics and quality of life improved from baseline to 6 and 12 months. At 12 months, MLHFQ scores changed by -6.8 ± 20.0 (P = 0.005). The 6-month rate of HF hospitalization was 4.7% in treatment patients (standard error = 3.3) and 17.0% in control patients (standard error = 5.5) (P = 0.065). Reported adverse events were as expected for a transvenous implantable system.

CONCLUSIONS

Phrenic nerve stimulation reduces CSA severity in patients with HF. In parallel, this CSA treatment was associated with benefits on HF quality of life.

What is the Optimal Strategy for Adaptive Servo-Ventilation Therapy?

Clinical advantages in the adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy have been reported in selected heart failure patients with/without sleep-disorder breathing, whereas multicenter randomized control trials could not demonstrate such advantages. Considering this discrepancy, optimal patient selection and device setting may be a key for the successful ASV therapy. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters indicating pulmonary congestion such as elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were reported as predictors of good response to ASV therapy. Recently, parameters indicating right ventricular dysfunction also have been reported as good predictors. Optimal device setting with appropriate pressure setting during appropriate time may also be a key. Large-scale prospective trial with optimal patient selection and optimal device setting is warranted.

Identification and Treatment of Central Sleep Apnoea: Beyond SERVE-HF

Central sleep apnoea (CSA) occurs in a large proportion of HF patients. CSA has clear detrimental effects, resulting in intermittent hypoxia and sympathetic activation, and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment options are limited following the results of a recent trial in which adaptive servo-ventilation resulted in an increase in cardiovascular mortality. Ongoing studies utilising other forms of positive airway pressure may provide additional insight into the results of this trial. A new neurostimulation therapy, phrenic nerve stimulation, has offered a new physiological approach to the treatment of CSA. This therapy has resulted in improvements in the severity of disease and quality of life.

Adaptive servo-ventilation to treat central sleep apnea in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the Bad Oeynhausen prospective ASV registry

BACKGROUND

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is highly prevalent in heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HF-REF). The Bad Oeynhausen Adaptive Servo-ventilation (ASV) registry (NCT01657188) was designed to investigate whether treatment of CSA with ASV improved survival in HF-REF patients; the effects of ASV on symptoms and cardiopulmonary performance were also investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From January 2004 to October 2013, the registry prospectively enrolled HF-REF patients [NYHA class ≥ II, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 45%] with moderate to severe predominant CSA [apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15/h]. ASV-treated patients were followed up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, including natriuretic peptide concentrations, blood gas analyses, echocardiography, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) testing. 550 patients were included [age 67.7 ± 10 years, 90% male, 52% in NYHA class ≥ III, LVEF 29.9 ± 8%, AHI 35.4 ± 13.6/h, and time with nocturnal oxygen saturation < 90% (T < 90%) 58 ± 73 min]; ASV was prescribed to 224 patients. Over a median follow-up of 6.6 years, 109 (48.7%) ASV-treated patients and 191 (58.6%) controls died (adjusted Cox modelling hazard ratio of 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.68-1.24; p = 0.740); older age, lower LVEF, impaired renal function, low sodium concentration, and nocturnal hypoxemia were significant predictors of mortality. Patient reported NYHA functional class improved in the ASV group, but LVEF, CPX, 6MWD, natriuretic peptides and blood gases remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term ASV treatment of predominant CSA in HF-REF patients included in our registry had no statistically significant effect on survival. ASV improved HF symptoms, but had no significant effects on exercise capacity, LVEF, natriuretic peptide concentrations or blood gases during follow-up as compared to control patients.

Beneficial effects of adaptive servo-ventilation therapy on readmission and medical costs in patients with chronic heart failure

Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy is a novel modality of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and is now widely utilized to treat patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). However, there has been no clinical study of the effect of ASV therapy on readmission and cost-effectiveness for the treatment of CHF. The present study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of home ASV therapy in 45 patients with a history of two or more admissions a year for worsening CHF. Seven patients refused to undergo chronic ASV therapy and three died. Thus, 35 patients were eventually enrolled in the present study. New York Heart Association class (2.8 ± 0.4 versus 2.3 ± 0.5, p < 0.001), log plasma B-type natriuretic peptide level (2.53 ± 0.44 versus 2.29 ± 0.40 pg/mL, p < 0.0001), left atrial dimension (47.5 ± 7.0 versus 44.9 ± 7.6 mm, p = 0.014), and mitral regurgitation area ratio (20.3 ± 12.1 versus 16.9 ± 8.9%, p = 0.007) decreased significantly after 12 months of ASV therapy. The frequency of hospitalization after ASV was significantly lower than before ASV (1.0 ± 1.0 versus 2.3 ± 0.5 times/year/patient, p < 0.0001). ASV also decreased the duration of hospitalization from 64.4 ± 46.5 to 22.8 ± 27.5 days/year/patient (p < 0.0001). Consequently, the total medical costs were reduced by 37% after ASV (1.95 ± 1.37 versus 3.11 ± 1.75 million yen/patient, p = 0.003). ASV therapy reduced readmissions and medical costs in patients with CHF.

Complementary roles of gasotransmitters CO and H2S in sleep apnea

Sleep apnea, which is the periodic cessation of breathing during sleep, is a major health problem affecting over 10 million people in the United States and is associated with several sequelae, including hypertension and stroke. Clinical studies suggest that abnormal carotid body (CB) activity may be a driver of sleep apnea. Because gaseous molecules are important determinants of CB activity, aberrations in their signaling could lead to sleep apnea. Here, we report that mice deficient in heme oxygenase-2 (HO-2), which generates the gaseous molecule carbon monoxide (CO), exhibit sleep apnea characterized by high apnea and hypopnea indices during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Similar high apnea and hypopnea indices were also noted in prehypertensive spontaneously hypertensive (SH) rats, which are known to exhibit CB hyperactivity. We identified the gaseous molecule hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) as the major effector molecule driving apneas. Genetic ablation of the H₂S-synthesizing enzyme cystathionine-γ-lyase (CSE) normalized breathing in HO-2^-/- mice. Pharmacologic inhibition of CSE with l-propargyl glycine prevented apneas in both HO-2^-/- mice and SH rats. These observations demonstrate that dysregulated CO and H₂S signaling in the CB leads to apneas and suggest that CSE inhibition may be a useful therapeutic intervention for preventing CB-driven sleep apnea.

Management of Mechanical Ventilation in Decompensated Heart Failure

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a life-saving intervention for respiratory failure, including decompensated congestive heart failure. MV can reduce ventricular preload and afterload, decrease extra-vascular lung water, and decrease the work of breathing in heart failure. The advantages of positive pressure ventilation must be balanced with potential harm from MV: volutrauma, hyperoxia-induced injury, and difficulty assessing readiness for liberation. In this review, we will focus on cardiac, pulmonary, and broader effects of MV on patients with decompensated HF, focusing on practical considerations for management and supporting evidence.