1
|
Mojtahed Poor S, Henke M, Ulshöfer T, Köhm M, Behrens F, Burkhardt H, Schiffmann S. The role of antidrug antibodies in ustekinumab therapy and the impact of methotrexate. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023; 62:3993-3999. [PMID: 37079726 PMCID: PMC10691926 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We investigated the impact of concomitant MTX on ustekinumab (UST) levels and antidrug antibody (ADA) formation in PsA and evaluated consequences in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. METHODS We conducted a post-hoc analysis on 112 PsA serum samples of subjects treated with open-label UST and either concomitant MTX (UST/MTX, n = 58) or placebo (UST/pbo, n = 54) obtained in a randomized (1:1), double-blind, multicentre trial. A validated antibody-binding-based multitiered testing was used to detect ADA and ADA with neutralizing capacity (nADA). The impact of MTX on UST immunogenicity was analysed by comparison of UST/pbo with UST/MTX cohorts at different time points. Patient- and disease-related predispositions for ADA formation were investigated with multiple linear regression analysis. Immunogenicity impact on pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy was determined by cohort comparison between patients with and without ADA formation. RESULTS Over 52 weeks, 11 UST/pbo- and 19 UST/MTX-treated patients developed ADA (P > 0.05). In the UST/pbo cohort, the visit-dependent UST levels were in the range of 0.047 (0.05) -0.110 (0.07) µg/ml overall, and 0.037 (0.04)-0.091 (0.08) µg/ml in ADA-confirmed subjects. In UST/MTX-treated patients, the UST levels exhibited an intervisit variation in the range of 0.0502 (0.04)-0.106 (0.07) µg/ml overall and 0.029 (0.03)-0.097 (0.07) µg/ml in ADA positive subjects (P > 0.05). At week 52, ADA-confirmed patients did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) in safety or clinical outcomes from ADA-negative patients. CONCLUSION Concomitant MTX had no significant impact on UST immunogenicity. Furthermore, ADA formation was not associated with impairments in UST safety, efficacy or trough levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03148860.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sorwe Mojtahed Poor
- Department of Rheumatology, Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Marina Henke
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Thomas Ulshöfer
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Michaela Köhm
- Department of Rheumatology, Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Frank Behrens
- Department of Rheumatology, Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Harald Burkhardt
- Department of Rheumatology, Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Susanne Schiffmann
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lustberg MB, Kuderer NM, Desai A, Bergerot C, Lyman GH. Mitigating long-term and delayed adverse events associated with cancer treatment: implications for survivorship. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023; 20:527-542. [PMID: 37231127 PMCID: PMC10211308 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00776-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Despite the importance of chemotherapy-associated adverse events in oncology practice and the broad range of interventions available to mitigate them, limited systematic efforts have been made to identify, critically appraise and summarize the totality of evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions. Herein, we review the most common long-term (continued beyond treatment) and late or delayed (following treatment) adverse events associated with chemotherapy and other anticancer treatments that pose major threats in terms of survival, quality of life and continuation of optimal therapy. These adverse effects often emerge during and continue beyond the course of therapy or arise among survivors in the months and years following treatment. For each of these adverse effects, we discuss and critically evaluate their underlying biological mechanisms, the most commonly used pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment strategies, and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for their appropriate management. Furthermore, we discuss risk factors and validated risk-assessment tools for identifying patients most likely to be harmed by chemotherapy and potentially benefit from effective interventions. Finally, we highlight promising emerging supportive-care opportunities for the ever-increasing number of cancer survivors at continuing risk of adverse treatment effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam B Lustberg
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Aakash Desai
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Cristiane Bergerot
- Centro de Câncer de Brasília, Instituto Unity de Ensino e Pesquisa, Brasilia, Brazil
| | - Gary H Lyman
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rodriguez G, Mancuso J, Lyman GH, Cardoso F, Nahleh Z, Vose JM, Gralow JR, Francisco M, Sherwood S. ASCO Policy Statement on Biosimilar and Interchangeable Products in Oncology. JCO Oncol Pract 2023:OP2200783. [PMID: 37027797 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
As the voice of cancer care clinicians and the patients they serve, ASCO has taken steps to elevate awareness about biosimilar products and their use in oncology. In 2018, ASCO released its Statement on Biosimilars in Oncology which was subsequently published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology to serve as an educational tool which highlighted and provided guidance on several topical areas surrounding biosimilars. At the time of its publication, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had approved eight biosimilar products for use in the United States, including one product for use as a supportive care agent in the cancer setting and two products for use in the treatment for cancer. This number has risen dramatically (40 approvals), with a total of 22 cancer or cancer-related biosimilar products approved since 2015. Recently, the FDA also approved the four interchangeable biosimilar products for diabetes, certain inflammatory diseases, and certain ophthalmic diseases. Given the current market dynamics and the regulatory landscape, this ASCO manuscript now seeks to propose several policy recommendations across the scope of value, interchangeability, clinician barriers, and patient education and access. This policy statement is intended to guide ASCO's future activities and strategies and serves to affirm our commitment to providing education to the oncology community on the use of biosimilars in the cancer setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joan Mancuso
- Independent Breast Cancer Advocate, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - Julie M Vose
- University of Nebraska Medical Center/Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shubow S, Sun Q, Nguyen Phan AL, Hammell DC, Kane M, Lyman GH, Gibofsky A, Lichtenstein GR, Bloomgarden Z, Cross RK, Yim S, Polli JE, Wang YM. Prescriber Perspectives on Biosimilar Adoption and Potential Role of Clinical Pharmacology: A Workshop Summary. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2023; 113:37-49. [PMID: 36251545 PMCID: PMC10099086 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The approval and adoption of biosimilar products are essential to contain increasing healthcare costs and provide more affordable choices for patients. Despite steady progress in the number of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) biosimilar approvals over the years, biosimilar adoption in the United States has been slow and gradual, largely driven by payers rather than clinicians. In order to better understand the barriers to biosimilar adoption in the clinic, the University of Maryland Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (M-CERSI) and the FDA jointly hosted a virtual workshop on April 13, 2022, titled "Biosimilars: A Decade of Experience and Future Directions - Strategies for Improving Biosimilar Adoption and the Potential Role of Clinical Pharmacology." This summary documents the experiences of four leading academic clinicians with specialties in oncology, rheumatology, gastroenterology, and endocrinology and their perspectives on how to increase biosimilar adoption, including the role of clinical pharmacology. Besides systemic changes in pricing and reimbursement, there is a need for additional education of a broad range of providers, including advanced care practitioners, and patients themselves. Educational efforts highlighting the rigor of the studies that support the approval of biosimilars-including the clinical pharmacology studies-and the benefits of biosimilars, can play a major role in improving biosimilar acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Shubow
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Qin Sun
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Dana C Hammell
- School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Maureen Kane
- School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Gary H Lyman
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Allan Gibofsky
- Division of Rheumatology, Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gary R Lichtenstein
- University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Zachary Bloomgarden
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Raymond K Cross
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sarah Yim
- Office of Therapeutic Biologics and Biosimilars, Office of New Drugs, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - James E Polli
- School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yow-Ming Wang
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sakihama S, Karube K. Genetic Alterations in Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma: Novel Discoveries with Clinical and Biological Significance. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2394. [PMID: 35625999 PMCID: PMC9139356 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) is a refractory T-cell neoplasm that develops in human T-cell leukemia virus type-I (HTLV-1) carriers. Large-scale comprehensive genomic analyses have uncovered the landscape of genomic alterations of ATLL and have identified several altered genes related to prognosis. The genetic alterations in ATLL are extremely enriched in the T-cell receptor/nuclear factor-κB pathway, suggesting a pivotal role of deregulation in this pathway in the transformation of HTLV-1-infected cells. Recent studies have revealed the process of transformation of HTLV-1-infected cells by analyzing longitudinal samples from HTLV-1 carriers and patients with overt ATLL, an endeavor that might enable earlier ATLL diagnosis. The latest whole-genome sequencing study discovered 11 novel alterations, including CIC long isoform, which had been overlooked in previous studies employing exome sequencing. Our study group performed the targeted sequencing of ATLL in Okinawa, the southernmost island in Japan and an endemic area of HTLV-1, where the comprehensive genetic alterations had never been analyzed. We found associations of genetic alterations with HTLV-1 strains phylogenetically classified based on the tax gene, an etiological virus factor in ATLL. This review summarizes the genetic alterations in ATLL, with a focus on their clinical significance, geographical heterogeneity, and association with HTLV-1 strains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shugo Sakihama
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara 903-0215, Japan
| | - Kennosuke Karube
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang HY, Liu CC, Yu Y, Wang L, Wu DW, Guo LW, Wang SH, Fang H, Bai Y, Fang Y, Fan Q, Sun C, Wu Y, Shi JF, Ma F, Tang Y, Dai M, Li N. Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Cancer Biosimilars Worldwide: A Systematic Review. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:572569. [PMID: 33536905 PMCID: PMC7849203 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.572569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose: The availability of oncology biosimilars is deemed as a fundamental strategy to achieve sustainable health care. However, there is scarce systematic evidence on economic effectiveness of cancer biosimilars. We aimed to synthesize evidence from pharmacoeconomic evaluation of oncology biosimilars globally, provide essential data and methodological reference for involved stakeholders. Materials and Methods: This systematic review was conducted in PubMed, embase, the Cochrane library, CRD, ISPOR and NICE utill December 31, 2019. Information on basic characteristics, evaluation methodology and results were extracted. Quality of included studies was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards Checklist. Results: For 17 studies identified (13 from Europe and four from United States), the overall quality was generally acceptable. A total of seven biological molecules involved with filgrastim, EPOETIN α, and trastuzumab leading the three. The mostly common evaluation perspective was payer, but the time horizon varied greatly. There were ten studies which adopted cost minimization analysis to evaluate efficiency while seven studies adopted budget impact analysis to address affordability, with cost ratio and cost saving being its corresponding primary endpoint. Although the comparability of included studies was limited and specific results were largely affected by uptake and price discount rates of the oncology biosimilar, the comprehensive results consistently favored its promotion. Conclusion: Globally, the economic evaluation of cancer biosimilars is in its initial phase. However, limited evidence from developed countries consistently supported both cost-effectiveness of efficiency and affordability of oncology biosimilars, while they were largely affected by uptake and price discount rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui-Yao Huang
- Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Cheng-Cheng Liu
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yue Yu
- Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Le Wang
- Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Da-Wei Wu
- Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lan-Wei Guo
- Office for Cancer Control and Research, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Shu-Hang Wang
- Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Fang
- Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Bai
- Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Fang
- Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qi Fan
- Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chao Sun
- Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Wu
- Pfizer Investment Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | - Ju-Fang Shi
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Ma
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Tang
- Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Min Dai
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Li
- Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lüftner D, Lyman GH, Gonçalves J, Pivot X, Seo M. Biologic Drug Quality Assurance to Optimize HER2 + Breast Cancer Treatment: Insights from Development of the Trastuzumab Biosimilar SB3. Target Oncol 2020; 15:467-475. [PMID: 32748046 PMCID: PMC7560928 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-020-00742-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
SB3 is a biosimilar of trastuzumab that has been approved for use in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor 2-positive breast cancer and human epidermal growth factor 2-positive gastric cancer. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity is one of several critical quality attributes of trastuzumab. Data from the development of SB3 support the hypothesis of a relationship between antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity activity and clinical outcomes in terms of the response rate and long-term survival. Current analytic methods utilizing advanced technology allow the detection of small changes in other quality attributes that influence antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, such as glycosylation and FcγRIIIa binding. Use of such methods to monitor batch-to-batch consistency enables production of trastuzumab biosimilars with consistent quality. Trastuzumab biosimilars such as SB3 therefore have the potential to increase accessibility to trastuzumab-based therapy without compromising efficacy or safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Lüftner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Gary H Lyman
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - João Gonçalves
- iMed, Faculdade Farmacia da Universidade Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Minji Seo
- Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd., Incheon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu YN, Huang J, Guo C, Yang S, Ye L, Wu ST, Zhang XF, Yang XY, Han CC, Pei Q, Huang L, He QN, Yang GP. A randomized, double-blind, single-dose study to evaluate the biosimilarity of QL1101 with bevacizumab in healthy male subjects. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2020; 85:555-562. [PMID: 31907645 PMCID: PMC7036053 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-019-04014-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 12/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This is the first study to compare the pharmacokinetics of QL1101, a proposed bevacizumab biosimilar, with Avastin® sourced from Roche Diagnostics GmbH. METHODS In this double-blind, single-dose, parallel-group study, healthy male subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive QL1101 or Avastin® 3 mg/kg intravenously. Pharmacokinetic assessments were conducted for 85 days, with additional safety and immunogenicity assessments until day 90. Primary study endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-last), and maximum serum concentration (Cmax). Pharmacokinetic equivalence was shown if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the C0-max, AUC0-last, and AUC0-∞ were within the predefined bioequivalence margin of 80-125.00%. RESULTS A total of 82 subjects were randomized to the following groups: 42 to QL1101 and 40 to Avastin®. The 90% CIs of the GMRs of AUC0-∞, AUC0-last, and Cmax of QL1101 and Avastin® were (97.8%, 107.0%), (94.5%, 106.9%), and (94.1%, 107.3%), respectively, which were all within the bioequivalence margin. The incidence of adverse events was 90.5% and 95.0% in the QL1101 and Avastin® groups, respectively. Mean serum concentration-time profiles, secondary pharmacokinetic parameters, and safety and immunogenicity profiles were comparable across the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrated the pharmacokinetic equivalence of QL1101 to Avastin®. QL1101 (3 mg/kg, iv) is safe and tolerable in healthy Chinese subjects. These data support the further clinical evaluation of QL1101 as a bevacizumab biosimilar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya-Nan Liu
- Clinical Trails Center of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- XiangYa School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Jie Huang
- Clinical Trails Center of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Can Guo
- Clinical Trails Center of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Shuang Yang
- Clinical Trails Center of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Ling Ye
- Clinical Trails Center of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Shu-Ting Wu
- Clinical Trails Center of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Xing-Fei Zhang
- Clinical Trails Center of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Xiao-Yan Yang
- Clinical Trails Center of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Cui-Cui Han
- Qilu Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Jinan, Shangdong, China
| | - Qi Pei
- Department of Pharmacy of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Lu Huang
- Department of Pharmacy of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Qing-Nan He
- Research Center for Drug Clinical Evaluation, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
- Department of Pediatrics of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
| | - Guo-Ping Yang
- Clinical Trails Center of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
- XiangYa School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
- Research Center for Drug Clinical Evaluation, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Huang HY, Wu DW, Ma F, Liu ZL, Shi JF, Chen X, Wang SH, Fang H, Bai Y, Yu Y, Fang Y, Sun C, Fan Q, Wu Y, Fan RH, Zhou CY, He BX, Dai M, Li N, Xu BH, Sun Y, He J. Availability of anticancer biosimilars in 40 countries. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:197-201. [PMID: 32007192 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30860-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
10
|
Felice C, Pugliese D, Armuzzi A. The role of healthcare providers in accompanying biosimilars in inflammatory bowel diseases. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2019; 19:967-969. [DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2019.1566455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Felice
- IBD Unit, Presidio Columbus, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Pugliese
- IBD Unit, Presidio Columbus, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Armuzzi
- IBD Unit, Presidio Columbus, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
A Phase 2, International, Multicenter, Open-label Clinical Trial of Subcutaneous Tbo-Filgrastim in Pediatric Patients With Solid Tumors Undergoing Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2019; 41:525-531. [PMID: 31274668 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000001542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
This phase 2, multicenter, open-label trial investigated the safety and tolerability of tbo-filgrastim in pediatric patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. In total, 50 patients 1 month to below 16 years of age with solid tumors without bone marrow involvement were stratified into 3 age groups (2 infants, 30 children, 18 adolescents) and prophylactically administered tbo-filgrastim 5 µg/kg body weight once daily subcutaneously. The administration started after the last chemotherapy treatment in week 1 of the first cycle and continued until the expected neutrophil nadir had passed, and the neutrophil count had recovered to 2.0×10/L. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability of tbo-filgrastim; secondary endpoints included efficacy. The mean (SD) number of doses administered was 9.2 (2.83) in children and 7.3 (1.88) in adolescents. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 24% of patients; the most common were febrile neutropenia (FN) (12%), anemia (8%), and thrombocytopenia (8%). Nine patients (18%) experienced mild treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events; the most common were musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (8%). No deaths or withdrawals occurred. The incidence of severe neutropenia (SN) was 52% and the mean (SD) duration of SN was 1.8 (2.21) days; FN incidence was 26%. A daily dose of tbo-filgrastim 5 μg/kg body weight administered to pediatric patients demonstrated a safety profile consistent with the safety profile in adult patients. The incidence of FN was on the lower end of the range reported in the literature and the SN results provide supportive data on the efficacy of tbo-filgrastim in pediatric patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Thill M, Thatcher N, Hanes V, Lyman GH. Biosimilars: what the oncologist should know. Future Oncol 2019; 15:1147-1165. [PMID: 30793950 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2018-0728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
As originator biologic medicines lose patent protection, some biopharmaceutical companies are focusing on developing similar versions of these costly and complex therapies with a goal of providing more affordable treatment options. Many of these molecules, known as biosimilars, are now approved worldwide and several more are expected to be introduced in the near future. As more biosimilars become available, it is important for clinicians to become familiar with this new category of products and understand how biosimilars are developed, how their development differs from that of originator biologics and how they differ from generics. This review aims to provide the practicing clinician with the knowledge needed to understand biosimilars, along with some guidance on their use in treating oncologic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Thill
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nicholas Thatcher
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Gary H Lyman
- Public Health Sciences and Research Divisions, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| |
Collapse
|