Vitamin D-Binding Protein Deficiency and Homozygous Deletion of the GC Gene

Very Low Vitamin D in a Patient With a Novel Pathogenic Variant in the GC Gene That Encodes Vitamin D-Binding Protein

Circulating plasma vitamin D metabolites are highly bound to vitamin D-binding protein (DBP), also known as group-specific component or Gc-globulin. DBP, encoded by the GC gene, is a member of the albumin family of globular serum transport proteins. We previously described a homozygous GC gene deletion in a patient with apparent severe vitamin D deficiency, fragility fractures, and ankylosing spondylitis. Here, we report an unrelated patient free of fractures or rheumatologic disease, but with very low 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-hydroxyvitamin D, as well as undetectable DBP measured by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. A whole gene deletion was excluded by microarray, and Sanger sequencing of GC revealed a homozygous pathogenic variant affecting a canonical splice site (c0.702-1G > A). These findings indicate that loss of function variants in GC that eliminate DBP, and severely reduced total circulating vitamin D levels, do not necessarily result in significant metabolic bone disease. Together with our previous report, these cases support the free-hormone hypothesis, and suggest free vitamin D metabolites may serve as preferable indicators of bone and mineral metabolism, particularly when clinical suspicion of DBP deficiency is high.

Development and analytical validation of a novel bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D assay

BACKGROUND

Bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) may be a better indicator of vitamin D sufficiency than total 25OHD. This report describes a novel assay for measuring serum bioavailable 25OHD.

METHODS

We developed an assay for 25OHD % bioavailability based on competitive binding of 25OHD tracer between vitamin D-binding protein (DBP)-coated affinity chromatography beads and serum DBP. Bioavailable 25OHD, total 25OHD, albumin, and DBP protein concentrations were measured in 89 samples from hospitalized patients and 42 healthy controls to determine how the DBP binding assay responds to differences in concentrations of DBP and compares to calculated bioavailable 25OHD values.

RESULTS

DBP binding assay showed a linear relationship between DBP-bound 25OHD tracer recovered from bead supernatant and DBP calibrator concentrations (y = 0.0017x +0.731, R2 = 0.9961, p<0.001). Inversion of this relationship allowed interpolation of DBP binding equivalents based upon 25OHD tracer recovered. The relationship between DBP binding equivalents and % bioavailability fits a non-linear curve, allowing calculation of % bioavailable 25OHD from DBP binding equivalents (y = 10.625x-0.817, R2 = 0.9961, p<0.001). In hospitalized patient samples, there were linear relationships between DBP protein concentrations and DBP binding equivalents (y = 0.7905x + 59.82, R2 = 0.8597, p<0.001), between measured vs. calculated % bioavailability (y = 0.9528 + 0.0357, R2 = 0.7200, p<0.001), and between absolute concentrations of measured vs. calculated bioavailable 25OHD (y = 1.2403 + 0.1221, R2 = 0.8913, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The DBP-binding assay for bioavailable 25OHD shows expected changes in 25OHD % bioavailability in response to changes in DBP concentrations and concordance with calculated bioavailable 25OHD concentrations.