A randomized trial of colchicine for acute pericarditis

Recurrent pericarditis and interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is defined by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) as an instance of acute pericarditis (AP) that occurs at least 4-6 weeks after the resolution of a previous episode of the same ailment. To mitigate the risk of RP, it is advised to administer accurate and prolonged pharmacological treatment for both the initial AP and subsequent RP. ESC guidelines recommend commencing treatment for any single episode of AP, including those that contribute to RP, with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in conjunction with colchicine for several months, often followed by gradual tapering. If there is an inadequate response, corticosteroids (CS) may be introduced cautiously. However, in a minority of cases, even when NSAIDs, colchicine, and CS are administered together at the highest recommended dosages, they may prove ineffective. In such instances, treatment with immunosuppressive drugs or biologics is advised. Among biologics, interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors have been extensively studied, although certain gaps remain. This narrative review delves into the rationale for employing IL-1 inhibitors and presents findings from existing studies regarding their efficacy, tolerability, and safety. Analysis of the literature indicates that there is currently insufficient data to ascertain the true therapeutic role of IL-1 inhibitors in managing and preventing RP. However, theoretically, drugs targeting both IL-1α and IL-1β may offer superior efficacy compared to those solely targeting IL-1β due to the significant involvement of both cytokines in inflammation. Further research is warranted to determine the comparative effectiveness of IL-1α and IL-1β inhibitors.

Genetic variants in patients with recurrent pericarditis

AIMS

Presence of family cases and multiple recurrences of pericarditis suggest the existence of a possible genetic background in at least 10% of cases. The aim of the present study is to describe the genetic landscape of a cohort of patients with multiple recurrences (at least two recurrences).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients referred for at least two episodes of recurrences in a tertiary referral centre. Genetic testing was performed by whole exome sequencing (WES).

RESULTS

Our cohort included 108 consecutive patients with recurrent pericarditis [median age 32 years, interquartile range (IQR) 18.5; 67.6% females, all Caucasian, idiopathic aetiology in 71.1%] with a median number of recurrences of 5 (IQR 2). Overall, 16 patients (14.8%) had variants in genes related to the inflammatory response. Eleven variants were located in genes already associated with recurrent pericarditis (NLRP3, TNFRSF1A and MEFV) and five in inflammation/immunodeficiency-related genes (IFIH1, NFKBIA, JAK1, NOD2 and ALPK1). Furthermore, we identified 10 patients with variants located in genes associated with conduction system-related diseases, and 22 variants in 21 patients with genes associated with heart structural-related diseases.

CONCLUSION

In this first observational study using WES to assess genetic variants in patients with multiple recurrences of pericarditis, about 15% of patients bore at least one variant that may be related to the disease. These findings highlight the importance of addressing the role of genetic predisposition in recurrent pericarditis. Moreover, 28.7% of patients carry variants in different cardiac genes, worthy of a deeper investigation.

Acute and Post-Acute COVID-19 Cardiovascular Complications: A Comprehensive Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The risk of cardiovascular complications due to SARS-CoV-2 are significantly increased within the first 6 months of the infection. Patients with COVID-19 have an increased risk of death, and there is evidence that many may experience a wide range of post-acute cardiovascular complications. Our work aims to provide an update on current clinical aspects of diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular manifestations during acute and long-term COVID-19.

RECENT FINDINGS

SARS-CoV-2 has been shown to be associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular complications such as myocardial injury, heart failure, and dysrhythmias, as well as coagulation abnormalities not only during the acute phase but also beyond the first 30 days of the infection, associated with high mortality and poor outcomes. Cardiovascular complications during long-COVID-19 were found regardless of comorbidities such as age, hypertension, and diabetes; nevertheless, these populations remain at high risk for the worst outcomes during post-acute COVID-19. Emphasis should be given to the management of these patients. Treatment with low-dose oral propranolol, a beta blocker, for heart rate management may be considered, since it was found to significantly attenuate tachycardia and improve symptoms in postural tachycardia syndrome, while for patients on ACE inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), under no circumstances should these medications be withdrawn. In addition, in patients at high risk after hospitalization due to COVID-19, thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban 10 mg/day for 35 days improved clinical outcomes compared with no extended thromboprophylaxis. In this work we provide a comprehensive review on acute and post-acute COVID-19 cardiovascular complications, symptomatology, and pathophysiology mechanisms. We also discuss therapeutic strategies for these patients during acute and long-term care and highlight populations at risk. Our findings suggest that older patients with risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and medical history of vascular disease have worse outcomes during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and are more likely to develop cardiovascular complications during long-COVID-19.

Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Treatment of Pericarditis: A Review

Importance

Pericarditis accounts for up to 5% of emergency department visits for nonischemic chest pain in North America and Western Europe. With appropriate treatment, 70% to 85% of these patients have a benign course. In acute pericarditis, the development of constrictive pericarditis (<0.5%) and pericardial tamponade (<3%) can be life-threatening.

Observations

Acute pericarditis is diagnosed with presence of 2 or more of the following: sharp, pleuritic chest pain that worsens when supine (≈90%); new widespread electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation and PR depression (≈25%-50%); a new or increased pericardial effusion that is most often small (≈60%); or a pericardial friction rub (<30%). In North America and Western Europe, the most common causes of acute pericarditis are idiopathic or viral, followed by pericarditis after cardiac procedures or operations. Tuberculosis is the most common cause in endemic areas and is treated with antituberculosis therapy, with corticosteroids considered for associated constrictive pericarditis. Treatment of acute idiopathic and pericarditis after cardiac procedures or operations involves use of high-dose nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), with doses tapered once chest pain has resolved and C-reactive protein level has normalized, typically over several weeks. These patients should receive a 3-month course of colchicine to relieve symptoms and reduce the risk of recurrence (37.5% vs 16.7%; absolute risk reduction, 20.8%). With a first recurrence of pericarditis, colchicine should be continued for at least 6 months. Corticosteroids are often used if pericarditis does not improve with NSAIDs and colchicine. In certain patients with multiple recurrences, which can occur for several years, interleukin 1 (IL-1) blockers have demonstrated efficacy and may be preferred to corticosteroids.

Conclusions

Acute pericarditis is a common cause of nonischemic chest pain. Tuberculosis is the leading cause of pericarditis in endemic areas and is treated with antitubercular therapy. In North America and Western Europe, pericarditis is typically idiopathic, develops after a viral infection, or develops following cardiac procedures or surgery. Treatment with NSAIDs and colchicine leads to a favorable prognosis in most patients, although 15% to 30% of patients develop recurrence. Patients with multiple recurrent pericarditis can have a disease duration of several years or more, are often treated with corticosteroids, and IL-1 blockers may be used for selected patients as steroid-sparing therapy.

Clinical Utility of Rilonacept for the Treatment of Recurrent Pericarditis: Design, Development, and Place in Therapy

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) has been traditionally regarded as a "nightmare" for both clinicians and patients. Until approximately a decade ago, available treatments were thin on the ground with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, glucocorticoids, colchicine, and classical immunosuppressants being the only options. The first important step in the tale of RP was the advent of colchicine in clinical practice, which has been shown to halve the rate of first and subsequent pericarditis recurrences. The second major breakthrough advance in this setting was the introduction of interleukin-1 inhibitors based on the recently unveiled autoinflammatory nature of pericarditis. At present, anti-interleukin-1 inhibitors available for clinical use in patients with refractory RP include anakinra and rilonacept, with the latter having obtained FDA approval for this indication. Apart from the remarkable efficacy and good safety profile which is a common feature of all anti-interleukin-1 compounds, rilonacept has the advantage of weekly administration (instead of daily compared to anakinra) which is important in terms of adherence to treatment and improved quality of life albeit at the expense of a higher cost. This review aims to summarize the available evidence on the role of rilonacept in the treatment of RP and the reduction of the recurrences risk.

Colchicine for the treatment of the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases: current evidence and ongoing perspectives

Colchicine is one of the oldest drugs in medicine. Traditionally used to treat and prevent gouty attacks, it has been introduced into cardiovascular medicine for the treatment and prevention of pericarditis, starting from the positive experience in the treatment and prevention of polyserositis in familial mediterranean fever. Colchicine is a lipophilic drug that enters the cells and is eliminated by glycoprotein P. As granulocytes are lacking in this protein, colchicine is able to concentrate in these cells, exerting a substantial anti-inflammatory action, even with low oral doses. As these cells may trigger acute cardiovascular events, colchicine has been shown to be efficacious and safe to prevent acute coronary syndromes and ischemic stroke with an efficacy comparable to more established treatments, such as antiplatelet agents and statins. On this basis, colchicine seems a promising, efficacious, well tolerated, and cheap option for the prevention of several cardiovascular events, and it may become an additional pillar in the pharmacologic treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

Recurrent Pericarditis and Paradigm Shift in Cardiovascular Imaging and Targeted Therapeutics

Recurrent pericarditis poses a significant challenge to patients and clinicians given its high morbidity and health care burden. Since the last iteration of European Society of Cardiology Guidelines in 2015, further insights have been gained into the pathophysiology, multimodality imaging assessment, and treatment of this condition. The purpose of this review is to discuss each of these aspects and highlight the role of imaging-guided therapy and interleukin-1 inhibitors in autoinflammatory phenotypes that together have transformed the care of these patients. Although future investigations are needed to optimize diagnostic surveillance and timing of therapy, recent evidence points at an encouraging paradigm shift in the treatment of recurrent pericarditis.

Age-stratified patterns in clinical presentation, treatment and outcomes in acute pericarditis: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on acute pericarditis according to different age groups. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of age-related features in clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of acute pericarditis, with a focus on the geriatric population.

METHODS

Patients with a first episode of acute pericarditis were consecutively enrolled between January 2014 and June 2022, and divided into four groups according to age (G1: 18-35 years; G2: 35-55 years; G3: 55-75 years; G4: >75 years). Clinical characteristics and medical therapy were recorded at baseline, and during follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 471 patients (median age 56.3 (IQR 33-73) years, 32.3% women) were included. Younger age (G1-G2-G3) was associated with a higher frequency of chest pain, pericardial rubs (p<0001), ECG changes (p=0.002) and were more commonly treated with colchicine (p<0.001), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (p=0.006). Older patients (G4) depicted more commonly dyspnoea, pericardial/pleural effusion (p=0.007) and were more often treated with corticosteroids (p=0.037). A secondary cause of pericarditis was detected in 128/471 (27.2%) patients. Older patients were more commonly hospitalised and had a complicated course with new-onset atrial fibrillation (p<0.001) and cardiac tamponade (p=0.005), compared with younger patients, who presented more recurrences (respectively G1: 43.0%, G2: 34.7%, G3: 28.2% and G4: 16.2%; p<0.001). After multivariable analysis, younger age remained the strongest independent predictor for recurrences (HR 3.23, 95% CI 1.81 to 5.58, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Older age is associated with less recurrences of pericarditis, but more severe complications with need for hospitalisation.

Novel Treatments in Refractory Recurrent Pericarditis

Refractory recurrent pericarditis is a troublesome condition that severely impairs the quality of life of affected patients and significantly increases healthcare spending. Until recently, therapeutic options included only a few medications and most of the patients resorted to chronic glucocorticoid treatment with steroid dependence. In the most recent decade, the introduction of interleukin-1 blockers in clinical practice has revolutionized the treatment of glucocorticoid-dependent and colchicine-resistant recurrent pericarditis due to their excellent efficacy and good safety profile. The rationale for the introduction of this class of medications in clinical practice is the autoinflammatory nature of recurrent pericarditis in a substantial rate of cases, with interleukin-1 being the main pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in this context. This review aims to discuss the contemporary available evidence from original research and real-world data on interleukin-1 blocker use in refractory recurrent pericarditis, in terms of indications, mechanism of action, efficacy, side effects, and recommended treatment protocols. Moreover, novel treatment proposals, such as hydroxychloroquine, beta blockers, and cannabidiol, which showed encouraging preliminary results, are addressed. Finally, gaps in knowledge, unmet needs, and future perspectives related to recurrent pericarditis are thoroughly discussed.

Comparison of Colchicine Monotherapy Versus Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Monotherapy or Combination Therapy for the Prevention of Recurrent Pericarditis in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and/or Coronary Artery Disease

Objective: Guidelines recommend nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin for 2-4 weeks with colchicine for 3 months for the treatment of acute pericarditis. In patients with HFrEF and/or CAD, the adverse effect profile of NSAIDs pose concern. While previous studies evaluated colchicine as adjunctive therapy, colchicine monotherapy has never been assessed. This study aims to compare the efficacy of colchicine monotherapy to NSAID monotherapy or combination therapy for the prevention of recurrent pericarditis in patients with HFrEF and/or CAD. Methods: This was a single health-system, retrospective, observational cohort study. Patients were 18 years or older, had a diagnosis of acute pericarditis and HFrEF and/or CAD, and were discharged on colchicine and/or NSAID therapy. Patients were excluded if they had an episode of pericarditis within the previous 12 months. The primary outcome was the incidence of pericarditis recurrence or documentation of incessant symptoms within 12 months of the index hospitalization. Results: Of the 77 patients included, 43 (55.8%) were treated with colchicine monotherapy, 7 (9.1%) were treated with NSAID monotherapy, and 27 (35.1%) were treated with combination therapy. Pericarditis recurrence or documentation of incessant symptoms occurred in 16.3% of patients treated with colchicine monotherapy, 28.6% of those treated with NSAID monotherapy, and 18.5% of those treated with combination therapy (P = .740). Conclusion: In this study, no difference in the primary outcome was observed between groups. However, a prospective, randomized trial is needed to further elucidate the efficacy of colchicine monotherapy for the treatment of acute pericarditis in patients with HFrEF and/or CAD.

Acute Pericarditis Triggered by Severe Thyrotoxicosis

Acute pericarditis is a common inflammatory disorder with several causes including infection, malignancy, acute myocardial infarction, and autoimmune disease. Acute pericarditis can rarely present in the setting of thyrotoxicosis. A 65-year-old man with a past medical history of HIV, diastolic dysfunction, and prediabetes presented with positional chest pain, respiratory distress, and altered mentation. He was found down on the ground in a lethargic state and was last seen normally five days before the presentation. On presentation, he was tachycardic and tachypneic, requiring supplemental oxygenation with a nonrebreather mask to maintain adequate oxygen saturation. Initial electrocardiogram (EKG) demonstrated diffuse ST-elevations with early repolarization, consistent with acute pericarditis. Laboratory diagnostics revealed elevated lactic acid, leukocytosis, acute kidney injury, undetectable thyroid stimulating hormone, and elevations in T3, T4, C-reactive protein, brain natriuretic peptide, and creatinine kinase. Given the patient's complex presentation involving thyrotoxicosis and pericarditis, a multidisciplinary team discussion was pursued involving critical care, cardiology, and endocrinology. He was started on intravenous methylprednisolone (subsequently transitioned to prednisone), methimazole, and metoprolol. Colchicine was subsequently added for the management of pericarditis and prednisone was continued (given concomitant thyroid disease) with a plan for tapering them off, per cardiology and endocrinology recommendations. A transthoracic echocardiogram revealed a small pericardial effusion. Anticoagulation was not initiated given the potential risk of developing a hemorrhagic pericardial effusion. Thyroid ultrasound was nonsuggestive of Graves' disease. Thyrotoxicosis may present with a constellation of symptoms, including acute pericarditis. Timely recognition with EKG and echocardiography can aid in prompt management.

The efficacy of colchicine in preventing atrial fibrillation recurrence and pericarditis post-catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation - A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

Introduction

Catheter ablation (CA) initiates a proinflammatory process responsible for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence (25-40%) and pericarditis (0.8%). Due to its anti-inflammatory properties, colchicine, a microtubule inhibitor, is explored for the prevention of early AF recurrence and pericarditis after pulmonary vein isolation. We performed a pooled analysis to determine the rates of AF recurrence and pericarditis after CA in patients receiving colchicine.

Methods

A comprehensive literature review was conducted on PubMed and SCOPUS from inception to December 2023 using medical subject headings and keywords, followed by a citation and reference search. We identified prospective studies reporting recurrent AF and pericarditis outcomes after catheter ablation in patients taking colchicine versus placebo. A binary random effects model was used to estimate pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the leave-one-out method, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.

Results

Of the 958 identified studies, 4 met our inclusion criteria. A total of 1,619 patients were analyzed; 743 received colchicine, and 875 were in the placebo group. Recurrent AF after CA occurred in 192 (29.0 %) of the colchicine group and 318 (39.5 %) of the placebo group. Post-ablation pericarditis occurred in 34 (5.3 %) of the colchicine group and 128 (16.5 %) of the placebo group. Pooled analysis of prospective studies showed that colchicine decreased the odds of recurrent AF [OR: 0.63 (95 % CI: 0.50-0.78), p < 0.01, I2  = 8 %] and post-ablation pericarditis [OR: 0.34 (95 % CI: 0.16-0.75), p < 0.01, I2  = 57 %]. Odds of GI disturbance were increased with colchicine use in our analysis [OR: 2.77 (95 % CI: 1.17-6.56), p = 0.02, I2  = 84 %].

Conclusion

Colchicine use is associated with decreased odds of recurrent AF and pericarditis post-CA from the analysis of prospective studies. These results underscore the potential for colchicine therapy for future exploration with randomized and controlled research with different dosages.

Addressing residual risk beyond statin therapy: New targets in the management of dyslipidaemias-A report from the European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular Round Table

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the most common cause of death in Europe. Despite proven benefits, use of lipid-lowering therapy remains suboptimal. Treatment goals are often not achieved, even in patients at high risk with atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD). The occurrence of CV events in patients on lipid-lowering drugs is defined as "residual risk", and can result from inadequate control of plasma lipids or blood pressure, inflammation, diabetes, and environmental hazards. Assessment of CV risk factors and vascular imaging can aid in the evaluation and management decisions for individual patients. Lifestyle measures remain the primary intervention for lowering CV risk. Where drug therapies are required to reach lipid treatment targets, their effectiveness increases when they are combined with lifestyle measures delivered through formal programs. However, lipid drug dosage and poor adherence to treatment remain major obstacles to event-free survival. This article discusses guideline-supported treatment algorithms beyond statin therapy that can help reduce residual risk in specific patient profiles while also likely resulting in substantial healthcare savings through better patient management and treatment adherence.

Efficacy and Safety of Interleukin-1 Inhibitors in the Management of Patients with Recurrent Pericarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of interleukin-1 (IL-1) inhibitors in patients with recurrent pericarditis (RP) remain to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the impact of IL-1 inhibitors on patients suffering from RP.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched to identify articles investigating the effects of IL-1 inhibitors in patients with RP up until January 2024. Relevant data on study characteristics and results were selected based on predefined criteria. The results were combined using a random effects model.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 102 patients from three open-label randomized controlled trials. Overall, the use of IL-1 inhibitors, in comparison to placebo, demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of pericarditis recurrence [risk ratio (RR) 0.13; 95% confident interval (CI) 0.05-0.30; p < 0.05; I2 = 0%]. However, the administration of IL-1 inhibitors may lead to certain adverse events (AEs), including infections and injection-site reactions. The risk of AEs is significantly higher with IL-1 inhibitors compared with placebo (RR 1.88; 95% CI 1.30-2.72; p < 0.05; I2 = 0%). Nevertheless, the occurrence of serious AEs among patients was relatively rare, and no fatalities were reported.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that IL-1 inhibitors can effectively reduce the risk of recurrence in patients with RP and are relatively safe.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO identifier number CRD42023492904.

Salicylic acid modulates secondary metabolism and enhanced colchicine accumulation in long yellow daylily (Hemerocallis citrina)

Salicylic acid (SA) is an essential phytoregulator that is widely used to promote the synthesis of high-value nutraceuticals in plants. However, its application in daylily, an ornamental plant highly valued in traditional Chinese medicine, has not been reported. Herein, we investigated the exogenous SA-induced physiological, transcriptional and biochemical changes in long yellow daylily (LYD). We found that 2 mg/L foliar SA treatment significantly improved LYD plant growth and yield. Transcriptome sequencing and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) analysis revealed that the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis, sulfur metabolism, plant hormone signal transduction and tyrosine metabolism were significantly induced in SA-treated leaves. Many transcription factors and antioxidant system-related DEGs were induced under the SA treatment. Biochemical analyses showed that the leaf contents of soluble sugar, soluble protein (Cpr), ascorbic acid (AsA) and colchicine were significantly increased by 15.15% (from 30.16 ± 1.301 to 34.73 ± 0.861 mg/g), 19.54% (from 60.3 ± 2.227 to 72.08 ± 1.617 mg/g), 30.45% (from 190.1 ± 4.56 to 247.98 ± 11.652 μg/g) and 73.05% (from 3.08 ± 0.157 to 5.33 ± 0.462 μg/g), respectively, under the SA treatment. Furthermore, we identified 15 potential candidate genes for enhancing the growth, production and phytochemical content of LYD. Our results provide support for the bioaccumulation of colchicine in yellow daylily and valuable resources for biotechnological-assisted production of this important nutraceutical in Hemerocallis spp.

The impact of colchicine on patients with acute and chronic coronary artery disease

Inflammation plays a central role in coronary artery disease (CAD), and recent data have shown that anti-inflammatory drugs have the potential to reduce ischemic events in CAD patients. Colchicine is an ancient anti-inflammatory drug that targets neutrophil and inflammasome activities. It has been prescribed for decades for different rheumatological conditions. Given the important role of inflammation in the development of cardiovascular disease, there has been considerable interest in studying colchicine's potential to limit the progression of atherosclerosis among afflicted patients. In fact, there is a growing body of randomized data suggesting that use of low-dose colchicine reduces the risk of ischemic events in patients with CAD, particularly repeated revascularizations, new myocardial infarctions and strokes. This review article summarizes background information-including possible side effects and contraindications-as well as the current evidence backing up the use of colchicine in patients with established CAD.

Predictors of post-pericardiotomy syndrome after native valve-sparing aortic valve surgery

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine the rate and impact of post-pericardiotomy syndrome after native valve-sparing aortic valve surgery and the perioperative factors associated with its occurrence.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent native valve-sparing aortic valve surgery (i.e., repair ± ascending aorta replacement, valve-sparing root replacement, Ross procedure ± ascending aorta replacement) at our institution between January 2021 and August 2023 served as our study population. Post-pericardiotomy syndrome was diagnosed if patients showed at least two of the following diagnostic criteria: evidence of (I) new/worsening pericardial effusion, or (II) new/worsening pleural effusions, (III) pleuritic chest pain, (IV) fever or (V) elevated inflammatory markers without alternative causes. A logistic regression model was calculated.

RESULTS

During the study period, 91 patients underwent native valve-sparing aortic valve surgery. A total of 21 patients (23%) developed post-pericardiotomy syndrome early after surgery (PPS group). The remaining 70 patients (77%) showed no signs of post-pericardiotomy syndrome (non-PPS group). Multivariate logistic regression revealed blood type O (OR: 3.15, 95% CI: 1.06-9.41, p = 0.040), valve-sparing root replacement (OR: 3.12, 95% CI: 1.01-9.59, p = 0.048) and peak C-reactive protein >15 mg/dl within 48 hours postoperatively (OR: 4.27, 95% CI: 1.05-17.29, p = 0.042) as independent risk factors. 73% (8/11) of patients displaying all three risk factors, 60% (9/15) of patients with blood type O and valve-sparing root replacement, 52% (11/21) of patients with blood type O and early postoperative peak C-reactive protein >15 mg/dl and 45% (13/29) of patients with early postoperative peak C-reactive protein >15 mg/dl and valve-sparing root replacement developed post-pericardiotomy syndrome.

CONCLUSION

In summary, blood type O, valve-sparing root replacement and peak C-reactive protein >15 mg/dl within 48 hours postoperatively are significantly associated with post-pericardiotomy syndrome after native valve-sparing aortic valve surgery. Particularly, the presence of all three risk factors is linked to a particularly high risk of post-pericardiotomy syndrome.

Colchicine to reduce coronavirus disease-19-related inflammation and cardiovascular complications in high-risk patients post-acute infection with SARS-COV-2-a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

There is no known effective pharmacological therapy for long COVID, which is characterized by wide-ranging, multisystemic, fluctuating, or relapsing symptoms in a large proportion of survivors of acute COVID. This randomized controlled trial aims to assess the safety and efficacy of an anti-inflammatory agent colchicine, to reduce symptoms among those at high risk of developing long COVID.

METHODS

This multi-centre, parallel arm, 1:1 individual randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind superiority trial will enrol 350 individuals with persistent post-COVID symptoms. Participants will be randomized to either colchicine 0.5 mg once daily (< 70 kg) or twice daily (≥ 70 kg) or matched placebo for 26 weeks and will be followed up until 52 weeks after randomization. The primary trial objective is to demonstrate the superiority of colchicine over a placebo in improving distance walked in 6 min at 52 weeks from baseline. The secondary objectives are to assess the efficacy of colchicine compared to placebo with respect to lung function, inflammatory markers, constitutional symptoms, and mental health state. In a sub-sample of 100 participants, cardiac biomarkers of myocardial injury and myocardial oedema using MRI will be compared.

DISCUSSION

Persistent inflammatory response following SARS-CoV-19 is one of the postulated pathophysiological mechanisms of long COVID. Colchicine, a low-cost anti-inflammatory agent, acts via multiple inflammatory pathways and has an established safety profile. This trial will generate evidence for an important health priority that can rapidly translate into practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This clinical trial has been registered prospectively on www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov with registration CTRI/2021/11/038234 dated November 24, 2021.

Colchicine in acute heart failure: Rationale and design of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (COLICA)

AIMS

Heart failure (HF) elicits a pro-inflammatory state, which is associated with impaired clinical outcomes, but no anti-inflammatory therapies have demonstrated a clinical benefit yet. Inflammatory pathways related with the interleukin-1 axis are overactivated during episodes of acute HF. Colchicine, an anti-inflammatory drug with proven benefits in acute pericarditis and ischaemic heart disease, may target this inflammatory response. This study aims to assess the efficacy of colchicine in acute HF patients.

METHODS

COLICA is a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling 278 patients across 12 sites. Patients presenting with acute HF, clinical evidence of congestion requiring ≥40 mg of intravenous furosemide and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) >900 pg/ml, are eligible for participation. Patients are enrolled irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction, HF type (new-onset or not) and setting (hospital or outpatient clinic). Patients are randomized 1:1 within the first 24 h of presentation to either placebo or colchicine, with an initial loading dose of 2 mg followed by 0.5 mg every 12 h for 8 weeks (reduced dose if <70 kg, >75 years old, or glomerular filtration rate <50 ml/min/1.73 m2). The primary efficacy endpoint is the time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP concentrations from baseline to week 8. Key secondary and exploratory outcomes include symptoms, diuretic use, worsening HF episodes, related biomarkers of cardiac stress and inflammation, total and cardiovascular readmissions, mortality and safety events.

CONCLUSION

COLICA will be the first randomized trial testing the efficacy and safety of colchicine for acute HF.

Medical therapy of pericarditis: tips and tricks for clinical practice

Medical therapy of pericarditis should be targeted at its aetiology. Unfortunately, many cases of pericarditis remain idiopathic after a complete diagnostic workup. In such cases, empiric anti-inflammatory therapy for pericarditis is aimed at controlling symptoms and preventing recurrences. The aim of the present clinical review is to summarize published evidence, guidelines, and to provide tips and tricks for clinical management of acute and recurrent pericarditis.

COVID-19 Presenting as Encephalitis and Myopericarditis: A Report of a Rare Case

COVID-19 might present with a wide range of clinical manifestations, from mild respiratory distress to severe multi-organ dysfunction. We present a unique case of complex COVID-19 presentation in a 45-year-old female who initially developed general symptoms such as fever, cough, headache, and weakness, which escalated to coma, requiring intubation and ICU admission. A brain MRI revealed lesions compatible with encephalitis, the cause of which remained unexplained after an in-depth clinical, laboratory, and imaging investigation. While in the ICU, the patient also developed cardiac tamponade, requiring pericardiocentesis, and atypical electrocardiographic changes. After treatment with steroids, her condition improved, and the patient was extubated and transferred to the ward. Upon checkup, cardiac MRI revealed fibrous tissue in the inferior cardiac wall and the adjacent intraventricular septum. In the absence of an alternative diagnosis, it might be important to consider the central nervous system and cardiac involvement in patients with COVID-19.

Novel Therapeutic Insights Into the Treatment of Pericarditis: Targeting the Innate Immune System

ABSTRACT

Acute pericarditis is characterized by pericardial inflammation that can be treated with anti-inflammatory drugs. A considerable percentage of patients develops recurrent pericarditis with several relapses. In developed countries, the idiopathic form is the most frequent and has a high risk of recurrences. Two pathophysiological mechanisms have been described for idiopathic recurrent pericarditis: autoimmune and autoinflammatory. The autoimmune mechanism is more frequently encountered in patients with rheumatologic disorders, especially systemic lupus erythematosus. The innate immune system plays a central role in the pathophysiology of pericarditis, especially in the autoinflammatory phenotype. Current evidence highlights the central role played by interleukin 1 and NLRP3 (NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) in idiopathic recurrent pericarditis. Accordingly, interleukin 1 blockers have been approved for the treatment of this condition. Neutrophils are likely to be important in such setting; however, their role has only been partially investigated. In the present review, we have collected the current knowledge on the role of innate immune system in pericarditis pathophysiology and how this can be used to provide targeted treatments for patients with recurrent pericarditis.

Acute and Complicated Inflammatory Pericarditis: A Guide to Contemporary Practice

Inflammatory disease of the pericardium represents a relatively common presentation, especially among the young. For the most part, inflammatory pericardial disease can be expeditiously and effectively managed without significant sequelae. However, some individuals present with severe and recurrent illness, representing significant therapeutic challenges. During the past decade, there have been great strides made in developing an evidence-based approach to management of inflammatory pericardial disease, the result of which has been the development of (1) a systematic, protocoled approach to initial care; (2) targeted therapeutics; and (3) specialized, collaborative, and integrated care pathways. Herein we present a review of the current state of the art as it pertains to the diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic considerations in inflammatory pericardial disease with a focus on acute and complicated pericarditis.

Efficacy and safety of colchicine for the treatment of myopericarditis

OBJECTIVE

Clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of colchicine only in simple pericarditis, excluding cases of concomitant myocarditis. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine for the treatment of the first attack of acute pericarditis with concomitant myocardial involvement.

METHODS

Double-centre retrospective cohort study analysing consecutive patients admitted for first attack of pericarditis with myocarditis and treated with or without colchicine. The primary efficacy end point was the time to the first recurrence. Propensity score matching was used to generate two groups of patients with similar baseline characteristics. Colchicine-associated side effects were analysed as safety end-point.

RESULTS

A total of 175 patients (mean age 46.2±20.1 years, 25.1% females, 88.6% with idiopathic/viral aetiology) were included. Seventy-nine (45.1%) patients were treated with colchicine. After a median follow-up of 25.3 (IQR 8.3-45.6) months, 58 (33.1%) patients had recurrences. The propensity score generated two groups of 73 patients with similar baseline characteristics but the use of colchicine. Patients treated with colchicine had a lower incidence of recurrences (respectively, 19.2% vs 43.8%; p=0.001) and a longer event-free survival (p=0.005). In multivariable analysis, women (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.73; p=0.037) and corticosteroid use (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.47; p=0.018) were independent risk factors for recurrences. Colchicine-associated side effects were mild and occurred in 3 (1.7%) patients.

CONCLUSION

In patients with first attack of pericarditis associated with myocardial involvement, colchicine was safe and efficacious for the reduction of recurrences.

Colchicine: the good, the bad, the ugly and how to minimize the risks

Colchicine has an important role in managing various conditions, including gout, familial Mediterranean fever, amyloidosis, Behçet's syndrome, recurrent pericarditis and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. The adverse effect profile of colchicine is well understood. However, due to its narrow therapeutic index, colchicine has been associated with overdose and fatalities. When ingested in toxic amounts, the mainstay of management is supportive care. Strategies to minimize the risk of colchicine poisoning can focus on three broad causes: unauthorized access, intentional overdose and inappropriate dosing. Culturally safe and appropriate education about storage and appropriate use of colchicine is essential to minimize the risk of overdose.

The role of the NLRP3 inflammasome and pyroptosis in cardiovascular diseases

An intense, stereotyped inflammatory response occurs in response to ischaemic and non-ischaemic injury to the myocardium. The NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome is a finely regulated macromolecular protein complex that senses the injury and triggers and amplifies the inflammatory response by activation of caspase 1; cleavage of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18, to their mature forms; and induction of inflammatory cell death (pyroptosis). Inhibitors of the NLRP3 inflammasome and blockers of IL-1β and IL-18 activity have been shown to reduce injury to the myocardium and pericardium, favour resolution of the inflammation and preserve cardiac function. In this Review, we discuss the components of the NLRP3 inflammasome and how it is formed and activated in various ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiac pathologies (acute myocardial infarction, cardiac dysfunction and remodelling, atherothrombosis, myocarditis and pericarditis, cardiotoxicity and cardiac sarcoidosis). We also summarize current preclinical and clinical evidence from studies of agents that target the NLRP3 inflammasome and related cytokines.

Constrictive pericarditis in the new millennium

Constrictive pericarditis (CP) is a complex clinical syndrome in which an inflamed pericardium becomes fibrotic and non-compliant, ultimately reducing cardiac pump performance. Although we have known about CP for centuries, it remains a challenge to diagnose. Recent advances in cardiac imaging, along with an expanding armamentarium of treatment options, have improved the quality and precision of care for patients with CP. This article reviews important historical and contemporary perspectives on the pathophysiology of CP, as well as our approach to diagnosis and management.

Efficacy of colchicine in addition to anakinra in patients with recurrent pericarditis

AIM

Anakinra, an anti IL-1 agent targeting IL-1 alfa and beta, is available for the treatment of recurrent pericarditis in cases with corticosteroid dependence and colchicine resistance after failure of conventional therapies. However, it is unclear if the combination with colchicine, a non-specific inhibitor of the inflammasome targeting the same inflammatory pathway of IL-1, could provide additional benefit to prevent further recurrences. The aim of the present observational study is to assess whether the addition of colchicine on top of anakinra could prolong the time to first recurrence and prevent recurrences better than anakinra alone.

METHODS

International, all-comers, multicentre, retrospective observational cohort study analysing all consecutive patients treated with anakinra for corticosteroid-dependent and colchicine-resistant recurrent pericarditis. The efficacy endpoint was recurrence rate and the time to the first recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 256 patients (mean age 45.0±15.4 years, 65.6% females, 80.9% with idiopathic/viral aetiology) were included. 64 (25.0%) were treated with anakinra as monotherapy while 192 (75.0%) with both anakinra and colchicine. After a follow-up of 12 months, 56 (21.9%) patients had recurrences. Patients treated with colchicine added to anakinra had a lower incidence of recurrences (respectively, 18.8% vs 31.3%; p=0.036) and a longer event-free survival (p=0.025). In multivariable analysis, colchicine use prevented recurrences (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.91; p=0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of colchicine on top of anakinra treatment could be helpful to reduce recurrences and prolong the recurrence-free survival.

Systematic Aetiological Assessment of Myocarditis: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Myocarditis is commonly diagnosed in the intensive care cardiology unit (ICCU). No current recommendation nor guideline aids exist for aetiological assessments.

METHODS

From September 2021 to October 2023, 84 patients with acute myocarditis underwent thorough and systematic serum and blood cell panel evaluations to determine the most common causes of myocarditis.

RESULTS

Of the 84 patients (median age 34 years, range 22-41 years, 79% male), 16 presented with complicated myocarditis. The systematic aetiological assessment revealed that 36% of patients were positive for lupus anticoagulant, 12% for antinuclear antibodies, 8% for anti-heart antibodies, and 12% for anti-striated muscle antibodies. Viral serology did not yield any significant results. After the aetiological assessment, one patient was diagnosed with an autoimmune inflammatory disorder (Still's disease). T-cell subset analyses indicated that myocarditis severity tended to increase with the T-cell lymphopenia status.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive, systematic aetiological assessment was of limited value in terms of predicting the clinical or therapeutic outcomes in myocarditis patients presenting to the ICCU.

Interleukin-1 Blockers in Recurrent and Acute Pericarditis: State of the Art and Future Directions

Diseases of the pericardium encompass a spectrum of conditions, including acute and recurrent pericarditis, where inflammation plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations. Anti-inflammatory therapy indeed forms the cornerstone of treating these conditions: NSAIDs, colchicine, and corticosteroids (as a second-line treatment) are recommended by current guidelines. However, these medications come with several contraindications and are not devoid of adverse effects. In recent years, there has been an increased focus on the role of the inflammasome and potential therapeutic targets. Recurrent pericarditis also shares numerous characteristics with other autoinflammatory diseases, in which interleukin-1 antagonists have already been employed with good efficacy and safety. The objective of this review is to summarize the available studies on the use of anti-IL-1 drugs both in acute and recurrent pericarditis.

Colchicine to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Inflammation may promote atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation. This study aimed to evaluate a short-term anti-inflammatory treatment with colchicine following ablation of AF.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for ablation were randomized to receive colchicine 0.6 mg twice daily or placebo for 10 days. The first dose of the study drug was administered within 4 hours before ablation. Atrial arrhythmia recurrence was defined as AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia >30 s on two 14-day Holters performed immediately and at 3 months following ablation.

RESULTS

The modified intention-to-treat population included 199 patients (median age, 61 years; 22% female; 70% first procedure) who underwent radiofrequency (79%) or cryoballoon ablation (21%) of AF. Antiarrhythmic drugs were prescribed at discharge in 149 (75%) patients. Colchicine did not prevent atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 2 weeks (31% versus 32%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% CI, 0.59-1.61]; P=0.92) or at 3 months following ablation (14% versus 15%; HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.45-2.02]; P=0.89). Postablation chest pain consistent with pericarditis was reduced with colchicine (4% versus 15%; HR, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.09-0.77]; P=0.02) and colchicine increased diarrhea (26% versus 7%; HR, 4.74 [95% CI, 1.95-11.53]; P<0.001). During a median follow-up of 1.3 years, colchicine did not reduce a composite of emergency department visit, cardiovascular hospitalization, cardioversion, or repeat ablation (29 versus 25 per 100 patient-years; HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.69-1.99]; P=0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Colchicine administered for 10 days following catheter ablation did not reduce atrial arrhythmia recurrence or AF-associated clinical events, but did reduce postablation chest pain and increase diarrhea.

The relationship between atrial fibrillation and NLRP3 inflammasome: a gut microbiota perspective

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common clinical arrhythmia whose pathogenesis has not been fully elucidated, and the inflammatory response plays an important role in the development of AF. The inflammasome is an important component of innate immunity and is involved in a variety of pathophysiologic processes. The NLRP3 inflammasome is by far the best studied and validated inflammasome that recognizes multiple pathogens through pattern recognition receptors of innate immunity and mediates inflammatory responses through activation of Caspase-1. Several studies have shown that NLRP3 inflammasome activation contributes to the onset and development of AF. Ecological dysregulation of the gut microbiota has been associated with the development of AF, and some evidence suggests that gut microbiota components, functional byproducts, or metabolites may induce or exacerbate the development of AF by directly or indirectly modulating the NLRP3 inflammasome. In this review, we report on the interconnection of NLRP3 inflammasomes and gut microbiota and whether this association is related to the onset and persistence of AF. We discuss the potential value of pharmacological and dietary induction in the management of AF in the context of the association between the NLRP3 inflammasome and gut microbiota. It is hoped that this review will lead to new therapeutic targets for the future management of AF.

The Canadian Study of Arterial Inflammation in Patients with Diabetes and Recent Vascular Events, Evaluation of Colchicine Effectiveness (CADENCE): protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Inflammation is a key mediator in the development and progression of the atherosclerotic disease process as well as its resultant complications, like myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and cardiovascular (CV) death, and is emerging as a novel treatment target. Trials involving anti-inflammatory medications have demonstrated outcome benefit in patients with known CV disease. In this regard, colchicine appears to hold great promise. However, there are potential drawbacks to colchicine use, as some studies have identified an increased risk of infection, and a non-significant trend for increased all-cause mortality. Thus, a more thorough understanding of the underlying mechanism of action of colchicine is needed to enable a better patient selection for this novel CV therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of the Canadian Study of Arterial Inflammation in Patients with Diabetes and Recent Vascular Events, Evaluation of Colchicine Effectiveness (CADENCE) trial is to assess the effect of colchicine on vascular inflammation in the carotid arteries and ascending aorta measured with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or pre-diabetes who have experienced a recent vascular event (acute coronary syndrome (ACS)/MI, transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or stroke). Secondary objectives include determining colchicine's effect on inflammatory biomarkers (high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6)). Additionally, we will assess if baseline inflammation imaging or biomarkers are associated with a treatment response to colchicine determined by imaging. Exploratory objectives will look at: (1) the difference in the inflammatory response to colchicine in patients with coronary events compared with patients with cerebral events; (2) the difference in the inflammatory response to colchicine in different vascular beds; (3) the relationship of FDG-PET imaging markers with serum biomarkers and (4) assessment of quality-of-life changes.

METHODS AND DESIGN

CADENCE is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to determine the effect of colchicine on arterial inflammation as assessed with imaging and circulatory biomarkers, specifically carotid arteries and aortic FDG uptake as well as hs-CRP and IL-6 among others. Patients with T2DM or pre-diabetes who have recently experienced a CV event (within 30-120 days after an ACS (ie, ST-elevation MI (STEMI) or non-STEMI)) or TIA/stroke with documented large vessel atherosclerotic disease will be randomised to treatment with either colchicine 0.6 mg oral daily or placebo. Participants will undergo baseline clinical evaluation including EQ5D assessment, blood work for inflammatory markers and FDG PET/CT scan of the ascending aorta and left and right carotid arteries. Patients will undergo treatment for 6 months and have repeat clinical evaluation including EQ5D assessment, blood work for inflammatory markers and FDG PET/CT scan at the conclusion of the study. The primary outcome will be the change in the maximum target to background ratio (TBRmax) in the ascending aorta (or carotid arteries) from baseline to follow-up on FDG PET/CT imaging.

DISCUSSION

Colchicine is an exciting potential new therapy for CV risk reduction. However, its use is associated with side effects and greater understanding of its underlying mechanism of action is needed. Importantly, the current study will determine whether its anti-inflammatory action is an indirect systemic effect, or a more local plaque action that decreases inflammation. The results will also help identify patients who will benefit most from such therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04181996.

Prevalence of Pericardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement in Patients After Cardiac Surgery: Clinical and Histological Correlations

BACKGROUND

Pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) is usually associated with active pericarditis, but it is not infrequently found in patients after cardiac surgery even a long time after the intervention. The clinical relevance of this finding and its histological correlates are unknown. We sought to determine the prevalence of chronic pericardial LGE in patients after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with previous cardiac surgery, who were referred to cardiovascular magnetic resonance between January 2017 and December 2021 were enrolled in the study. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance examination protocol was adapted to clinical indication but always included standard LGE acquisitions. Two independent observers blinded to clinical data assessed the presence of pericardial enhancement on LGE sequences. Fifteen patients underwent cardiac reintervention and pericardial biopsies were obtained. The primary study end point was to assess the prevalence of pericardial enhancement after cardiac surgery and identify possible determinants. The secondary end point was to correlate pericardial enhancement with clinical symptoms and histopathology.

RESULTS

Two hundred four patients were included in the study. The median time between surgery and cardiovascular magnetic resonance was 160 months (35-226 months). Pericardial LGE was observed in 90 patients (44%). All patients were asymptomatic, and no specific treatment for pericarditis was started. All patients remained asymptomatic at a 1-year clinical follow-up. Pericardial LGE was significantly correlated with the number of previous surgeries (P=0.03). Pericardial fibrosis was detected in all 15 pericardial biopsy specimens; pericardial LGE was present in 7 patients (47%) who underwent biopsy. Histological signs of low-grade inflammation were detected in 6 patients (40%) with severe, circumferential pericardial LGE but in no patient without pericardial enhancement.

CONCLUSIONS

Pericardial LGE is a frequent finding even several years after cardiac surgery. Its histological correlate is a chronic subclinical post-pericardiotomy inflammation.

Autoinflammatory Recurrent Pericarditis Associated with a New NLRP12 Mutation in a Male Adolescent

Idiopathic recurrent pericarditis (IRP) can be the hallmark of an autoinflammatory syndrome with recurrent attacks of chest pain and symptom-free intervals following an acute episode. The recurrence rate may be 35% in the pediatric population, frequently with less severe manifestations than at the first episode. Pericarditis can be the sole clinical manifestation or may be part of a systemic autoinflammatory disease (SAID), especially in the case of a recurrence. Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF), Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Periodic Syndrome (TRAPS), Mevalonate-Kinase Deficiency (MKD), nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2)-associated autoinflammatory syndrome, and others are closely related to IRP based on similar clinical manifestations and treatment responses to anti-interleukin 1 (IL-1) agents, such as anakinra, and should therefore be excluded in patients with IRP. A newly described SAID, an autosomal dominant disorder known as NLRP12-AID (nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat-containing receptor 12-related autoinflammatory disease) is caused by heterozygous mutations in the NLRP12 gene and most commonly affects children. Fewer than 40 pediatric patients with NLRP12-AID have been described in the medical literature, with none presenting with RP. We report a case of relapsing pericarditis responsive to anti-IL-1 therapy in a male adolescent who carried a missense mutation in the NLRP12 gene potentially causative of the excessive activation of inflammatory pathways. This is a unique case in the medical literature that associates recurrent pericarditis in an adolescent presumed to be related to the missense mutation in the NLRP12 gene. The role of the NLRP12 inflammasome in generating and maintaining recurrent pericardial inflammation should be considered.

Colchicine in atrial fibrillation: are old trees in bloom?

Colchicine is a widely used drug that was originally used to treat gout and rheumatic diseases. In recent years, colchicine has shown high potential in the cardiovascular field. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a cardiovascular disease with a high incidence. One of the most frequent complications following cardiovascular surgery is postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), which affects patient health and disease burden. This article reviews the research status of colchicine in AF and summarizes the relevant progress.

In-hospital adverse events and recurrence in hospitalized patients with acute pericarditis

BACKGROUND

Acute pericarditis occasionally requires invasive treatment, and may recur after discharge. However, there are no studies on acute pericarditis in Japan, and its clinical characteristics and prognosis are unknown.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of clinical characteristics, invasive procedures, mortality, and recurrence in patients with acute pericarditis hospitalized from 2010 to 2022. The primary in-hospital outcome was adverse events (AEs), a composite of all-cause mortality and cardiac tamponade. The primary outcome in the long-term analysis was hospitalization for recurrent pericarditis.

RESULTS

The median age of all 65 patients was 65.0 years [interquartile range (IQR), 48.0-76.0 years], and 49 (75.3 %) were male. The etiology of acute pericarditis was idiopathic in 55 patients (84.6 %), collagenous in 5 (7.6 %), bacterial in 1 (1.5 %), malignant in 3 (4.6 %), and related to previous open-heart surgery in 1 (1.5 %). Of the 8 patients (12.3 %) with in-hospital AE, 1 (1.5 %) died during hospitalization and 7 (10.8 %) developed cardiac tamponade. Patients with AE were less likely to have chest pain (p = 0.011) but were more likely to have symptoms lasting 72 h after treatment (p = 0.006), heart failure (p < 0.001), and higher levels of C-reactive protein (p = 0.040) and B-type natriuretic peptide (p = 0.032). All patients complicated with cardiac tamponade were treated with pericardial drainage or pericardiotomy. We analyzed 57 patients for recurrent pericarditis after excluding 8 patients: 1 with in-hospital death, 3 with malignant pericarditis, 1 with bacterial pericarditis, and 3 lost to follow-up. During a median follow-up of 2.5 years (IQR 1.3-3.0 years), 6 patients (10.5 %) had recurrences requiring hospitalization. The recurrence rate of pericarditis was not associated with colchicine treatment or aspirin dose or titration.

CONCLUSIONS

In acute pericarditis requiring hospitalization, in-hospital AE and recurrence were each observed in >10 % of patients. Further large studies on treatment are warranted.

Pericardial Diseases in Pregnancy

Pericardial effusion is the most common manifestation of pericardial diseases during pregnancy. This effusion is benign, mild, or moderate, well tolerated, with spontaneous resolution after delivery; no specific treatment is required. Acute pericarditis is the second most common condition, usually requiring medical therapy during pregnancy. Cardiac tamponade and constrictive pericarditis are rare in pregnancy. Pre-pregnancy counselling is essential in women of childbearing age with recurrent pericarditis to plan pregnancy in a phase of disease quiescence and to review therapy. High-dose aspirin or nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as ibuprofen and indomethacin, can be used up to the 20th week of gestation. Low-dose prednisone (2.5-10 mg/d) can be administered throughout pregnancy. All of these medications, apart from high-dose aspirin, may be used during lactation. Colchicine is compatible with pregnancy and breastfeeding, and it can be continued throughout pregnancy to prevent recurrences. Appropriate follow-up with a multidisciplinary team with experience in the field is recommended throughout pregnancy to ensure good maternal and fetal outcomes.

Treatment and Prophylaxis of Post-pericardiotomy Syndrome in Cardiac Surgery Patients: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Post-pericardiotomy syndrome (PPS) is a common complication of cardiac surgery. This systematic review aimed to investigate the efficacy of colchicine, indomethacin, and dexamethasone in the treatment and prophylaxis of PPS.

METHODS

Literature research was carried out using PubMed. Studies investigating ≥ 10 patients with clinically PPS treated with colchicine, dexamethasone, and indomethacin and compared with placebo were included. Animal or in vitro experiments, studies on < 10 patients, case reports, congress reports, and review articles were excluded. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2) was used for the quality assessment of studies.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included. Among studies with postoperative colchicine treatment, two of them demonstrated a significant reduction of PPS. In the single pre-surgery colchicine administration study, a decrease of PPS cases was registered. Indomethacin pre-surgery administration was linked to a reduction of PPS. No significant result emerged with preoperative dexamethasone intake.

CONCLUSION

Better outcomes have been registered when colchicine and indomethacin were administered as primary prophylactic agents in preventing PPS and PE. Further RCT studies are needed to confirm these results.

New Developments in the Management of Recurrent Pericarditis

Recurrent pericarditis is a common and troublesome complication that affects 15%-30% of patients with a previous episode of pericarditis. However, the pathogenesis of these recurrences is not well understood, and most cases remain idiopathic. Recent advances in medical therapy, including the use of colchicine and anti-interleukin-1 agents like anakinra and rilonacept, have suggested an autoinflammatory rather than an autoimmune mechanism for recurrences with an inflammatory phenotype. As a result, a more personalized approach to treatment is now recommended. Patients with an inflammatory phenotype (fever and elevated C-reactive protein level) should receive colchicine and anti-interleukin-1 agents as first-line therapy, whereas those without systemic inflammation should receive low to moderate doses of corticosteroids (eg, prednisone 0.2-0.5 mg/kg/d as an initial dose) and consider azathioprine and intravenous human immunoglobulins in the case of corticosteroid failure. Tapering of corticosteroids should be slow after achieving clinical remission. In this article, we review the new developments in the management of recurrent pericarditis.

Rilonacept and Other Interleukin-1 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Recurrent Pericarditis

Pericarditis is the commonest form of pericardial disease. Unfortunately, despite optimal treatment, approximately 15-30% of patients with acute pericarditis have recurrence. Many of these patients are refractory to colchicine, and become corticosteroid-dependent. Recurrent pericarditis severely impairs quality of life, and is associated with significant morbidity. Inflammasome formation and overproduction of interleukin (IL)-1 have been found to drive the systemic inflammatory response in recurrent autoinflammatory pericarditis. Several IL-1 inhibitors have been evaluated for their usefulness as therapeutic options. Rilonacept is a dimeric fusion protein that functions as a soluble decoy receptor that binds to both IL-1α and IL-1β, thereby inhibiting the IL-1 pathway. It is safe and efficacious in the treatment of recurrent pericarditis in the RHAPSODY II and III trials. Anakinra is a recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist that blocks the action of circulating IL-1α and IL-1β. It has also been shown to be safe and efficacious in the AIRTRIP and IRAP studies. Canakinumab is a selective human monoclonal antibody against IL-1β, and data on its use in recurrent pericarditis is scarce. Several questions regarding IL-1 inhibitor therapy, such as the duration of treatment and the recommended tapering protocols, as well as their use in special populations like pregnant or lactating women, remain unanswered and need to be addressed in future studies.

Efficacy and Safety of Different Dosing Regimens of Colchicine in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Network Meta-analysis of 15 Randomized Controlled Trials

ABSTRACT

Several meta-analyses have investigated the effects of different doses of colchicine in treating coronary artery disease, but all dosing regimens were never compared in a single study. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 3 dosing regimens of colchicine in patients with coronary artery disease. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS were searched for randomized controlled trials involving different colchicine doses. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs), discontinuation, and hospitalization were evaluated using risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 15 randomized controlled trial involving 13,539 patients were included. Pooled results calculated with STATA 14.0 showed that low-dose colchicine significantly reduced MACE (RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.83), recurrent MI (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35-0.89), stroke (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.23-1.00), and hospitalization (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.85), whereas high and loading doses significantly increased gastrointestinal AEs (RR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.26-6.24) and discontinuation (RR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.07-6.93), respectively. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that 3 dosing regimens did not reduce all-cause and cardiovascular mortality but significantly increased the gastrointestinal AEs, and high dose significantly increased AEs-related discontinuation; loading dose resulted in more discontinuation than low dose. Although differences between 3 dosing regimens of colchicine are not significant, low dose is more effective in reducing MACE, recurrent MI, stroke, and hospitalization than the control, whereas high and loading doses increase gastrointestinal AEs and discontinuation, respectively.

Can the current monkeypox affect the heart? A systematic review of case series and case report

BACKGROUND

Monkeypox is a zoonotic viral infection first reported in May 2022. Monkeypox cases present with prodromal symptoms, rash, and/or systemic complications. This study systematically reviews the monkeypox cases presented with any cardiac complications.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was done to locate papers that discuss any cardiac complications associated with monkeypox; then, data were analyzed qualitatively.

RESULTS

Nine articles, including the 13 cases that reported cardiac complications of the disease, were included in the review. Five cases previously had sex with men, and two cases had unprotected intercourse, which reveals the importance of the sexual route in disease transmission. All cases have a wide spectrum of cardiac complications, such as acute myocarditis, pericarditis, pericardial effusion, and myopericarditis.

CONCLUSION

This study clarifies the potential for cardiac complications in monkeypox cases and provides avenues for future research to determine the underlying mechanism. Also, we found that the cases with pericarditis were treated with colchicine, and those with myocarditis were treated with supportive care or cardioprotective treatment (Bisoprolol and Ramipril). Furthermore, Tecovirimat is used as an antiviral drug for 14 days.

Colchicine usage for prevention of post atrial fibrillation ablation pericarditis in patients undergoing high-power short-duration ablation

INTRODUCTION

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been associated with variable incidence (0.88%-10%) of pericarditis manifested as chest pain, possibly more prevalent with the advent of high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation. This has led to the widespread use of colchicine in preventative protocols for postablation pericarditis. However, the efficacy of preventative colchicine has not been validated yet.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of a routine postoperative colchicine regimen (0.6 mg twice a day for 14 days post-AF ablation) for prevention of postablation pericarditis in patients undergoing HPSD ablation.

METHOD

We retrospectively evaluated consecutive single-operator HPSD AF ablation procedures at our institution from June 2019 to July 2022. A colchicine protocol was introduced in June 2021 for the prevention of postablation pericarditis. All ablations were performed with 50 watts. Patients were divided into colchicine and noncolchicine groups. We recorded incidence of postablation chest pain, emergency room (ER) visit for chest pain, pericardial effusion, pericardiocentesis, any ER visit, hospitalization, AF recurrence, and cardioversion for AF within the first 30 days following ablation. We also recorded colchicine-related side effects and medication compliance.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ninety-four consecutive HPSD AF ablation patients were screened for the study. After implementing the prespecified exclusion criteria, a total of 205 patients were included in the final analysis, yielding 101 patients in the colchicine group and 104 patients in the noncolchicine group. Both groups were well-matched for demographic and procedural parameters. There was no significant difference in postablation chest pain (9.9% vs. 8.6%, p = .7), pericardial effusion (2.9% vs. 0.9%, p = .1), ER visits (11.9% vs. 12.5%, p = .2), 30-day hospitalization for AF recurrence (0.9% vs. 0.96%, p = .3), and 30-day need for cardioversion for AF (3.9% vs. 5.7%, p = .2). Fifteen (15) patients had severe colchicine-related diarrhea, out of which 12 discontinued it prematurely. There were no major procedural complications in either group.

CONCLUSION

In this single-operator retrospective analysis, prophylactic colchicine was not associated with significant reduction in the incidence of postablation chest pain, pericarditis, 30 day hospitalization, ER visits, or AF recurrence or need of cardioversion within first 30 days after HPSD ablation for AF. However, its usage was associated with significant diarrhea. This study concludes no additional advantage of prophylactic use of colchicine after HPSD AF ablation.