Internal Mammary and Medial Supraclavicular Irradiation in Breast Cancer

Toxicity Evaluation of Dose-Escalation in Hypofractionated Regional Nodal Irradiation for Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

Regional nodal irradiation (RNI) to the axilla and supraclavicular area presents distinct toxicities, such as lymphedema and shoulder stiffness, compared with whole-breast irradiation. There is insufficient evidence on the safety of dose-escalation in hypofractionated RNI. We aimed to evaluate and compare toxicity rates in patients with breast cancer who received hypofractionated RNI with and without dose-escalation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed 381 patients with breast cancer treated with hypofractionated RNI between March 2015 and February 2017. Patients received either the standard-dose to the regional nodal area (43.2 Gy/16 fx; 48.7 Gy3.5 equivalent dose [EQD2], 2 Gy equivalent dose with α/β= 3.5 Gy) or dose-escalation with a median dose of 54.8 Gy3.5 EQD2 (range, 51.7-60.9 Gy3.5 EQD2), depending on clinical and pathologic nodal stage. Toxicity rates of lymphedema and shoulder stiffness were assessed, and statistical analyses were conducted to identify associated factors.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 32.3 months (5.7-47.0 months). After radiation therapy, 71 (18.6%) patients developed lymphedema, and 48 (12.6%) developed shoulder stiffness. Patients who received dose-escalation exhibited significantly higher rates of lymphedema (32.1% vs 14.8%; odds ratio, 2.72, P = .0004) and shoulder stiffness (23.8% vs 9.4%; odds ratio, 2.01, P = .0205) compared with the standard-dose group. Moreover, dose-escalation showed a tendency to increase the severity of lymphedema and shoulder stiffness.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received dose-escalation in hypofractionated RNI face a higher risk of developing lymphedema and shoulder stiffness compared with those who received standard-dose hypofractionated RNI. Therefore, it is crucial to implement close and frequent monitoring for early detection, along with timely rehabilitation interventions for these patients.

Personalized Deep Learning Model for Clinical Target Volume on Daily Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Breast Cancer Patients

Purpose

Herein, we developed a deep learning algorithm to improve the segmentation of the clinical target volume (CTV) on daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans in breast cancer radiation therapy. By leveraging the Intentional Deep Overfit Learning (IDOL) framework, we aimed to enhance personalized image-guided radiation therapy based on patient-specific learning.

Methods and Materials

We used 240 CBCT scans from 100 breast cancer patients and employed a 2-stage training approach. The first stage involved training a novel general deep learning model (Swin UNETR, UNET, and SegResNET) on 90 patients. The second stage used intentional overfitting on the remaining 10 patients for patient-specific CBCT outputs. Quantitative evaluation was conducted using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff Distance (HD), mean surface distance (MSD), and independent samples t test with expert contours on CBCT scans from the first to 15th fractions.

Results

IDOL integration significantly improved CTV segmentation, particularly with the Swin UNETR model (P values < .05). Using patient-specific data, IDOL enhanced the DSC, HD, and MSD metrics. The average DSC for the 15th fraction improved from 0.9611 to 0.9819, the average HD decreased from 4.0118 mm to 1.3935 mm, and the average MSD decreased from 0.8723 to 0.4603. Incorporating CBCT scans from the initial treatments and first to third fractions further improved results, with an average DSC of 0.9850, an average HD of 1.2707 mm, and an average MSD of 0.4076 for the 15th fraction, closely aligning with physician-drawn contours.

Conclusion

Compared with a general model, our patient-specific deep learning-based training algorithm significantly improved CTV segmentation accuracy of CBCT scans in patients with breast cancer. This approach, coupled with continuous deep learning training using daily CBCT scans, demonstrated enhanced CTV delineation accuracy and efficiency. Future studies should explore the adaptability of the IDOL framework to diverse deep learning models, data sets, and cancer sites.

The EORTC 22922/10925 trial investigating regional nodal irradiation in stage I-III breast cancer: Outcomes according to locoregional and systemic therapies

The EORTC 22922/10925 trial aimed to investigate the impact on overall survival (OS) of elective internal mammary and medial supraclavicular (IM-MS) radiation therapy (RT) in breast cancer stage I-III. Surgery for the primary tumour and axillary lymph nodes, chest wall RT, boost RT after whole breast RT in breast conserving therapy (BCT), RT to operated axilla, and systemic therapy were per physician's preference. The aim of the current analysis is to assess breast cancer outcomes according to different locoregional and systemic therapy used in the trial.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Data with a median follow-up of 15.7 years were extracted from the trial's case report forms. Kaplan-Meier curves of disease-free and OS and cumulative incidence curves of breast cancer events were produced. An exploratory analysis of the effect of the type of locoregional and systemic therapy on breast cancer outcomes was conducted using the Cox model or the Fine & Gray model accounting for competing risks, both models being adjusted for baseline patient and disease characteristics and treatment. The significance level was set at 5 %, 2-sided.

RESULTS

Of the 4,004 patients included, 625 (16%) did not receive any postoperative systemic therapy, 1,185 (30%) received endocrine therapy only, 994 (25%) chemotherapy only, and 1,200 (30%) both chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, without differences between the randomisation arms. Administration and type of therapy was associated with age, menopausal status, clinical T- and N-stage and ER status (p < 0.0001). Local control was better with mastectomy (with/without postmastectomy RT) as compared to BCT, but mastectomy was associated with more distant metastasis (DM) as first event. Similarly, DM as first event occurred more in the BCT group that received a boost as compared to no boost and in those who received RT to the lower axillary level. IM-MS RT reduced significantly regional recurrences and improved disease-free survival in a sensitivity stratified analysis. OS was worse with mastectomy as compared to BCT and with irradiation of the axilla but better with sentinel node dissection and adjuvant combined chemo and hormonal therapy.

CONCLUSION

Different components of therapy influenced the site of first event. IM-MS RT improved outcomes in different breast cancer outcomes were most probably related that the group were balanced due to the trial arms and stratification methods.

Establishing a risk stratification model to identify clinically high-risk N0 breast cancer who could benefit from regional nodal irradiation: a single institute analysis

Background

The purpose of this real-world study was to investigate the risk factors for developing recurrence among patients with pathological T1-3N0 breast cancer (BC) treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by whole breast irradiation alone (WBI) and identify those clinically high-risk BCs who could benefit from regional nodal irradiation (RNI).

Materials and methods

Female BC patients treated at Shanghai Ruijin hospital from 2009 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival differences were compared with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. An external validation was conducted by using SEER database.

Results

A total of 622 BC patients treated with BCS+WBI alone were included. With a median follow-up of 82 months, the 7-year OS, BCSS and DFS for the entire cohort was 97%, 99% and 91%, respectively. Multivariable Cox analysis indicated that tumor size (p=0.006), tumor location (p=0.033), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) status (p=0.0028) and Ki-67 index (p=0.051) were independent risk factors for DFS. A scoring system was developed using these four factors and the 7-year DFS and OS were 97% and 96% for patients with 0-1 risk factors, 95% and 82% for patients with ≥2 risk factors (p<0.0001 for DFS, and p=0.0063 for OS). Based on tumor size and tumor location, an external validation by demonstrated that the 7-year OS was 90% and 88% for patients with 0-1 risk factor, which was significantly better than those defined as high-risk BC patients (82%, p<0.0001).

Conclusion

By using our institute database, we establish a risk stratification system for identifying sub-group of pN0 BC patients, who are at high risk for developing recurrence. The results of our study support tailored RT decision-making according to individual risks, which needed to be confirmed in further studies.

Oncological outcomes in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and prognostic implications of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 152 patients with residual TNBC who underwent breast-conserving surgery after NAC between December 2008 and December 2017. Most patients (n = 133; 87.5%) received taxane-based chemotherapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) was administered at a total dose of 45-65 Gy in 15-30 fractions to the whole breast, with some patients also receiving RT to regional nodes. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors influencing survival were analyzed using the Cox proportional-hazards model.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 66 months (range, 9 to 179 months), the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 68.0%. The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival rates were 83.6%, 72.6%, and 78.7%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the cN stage, ypT stage, ypN stage, axillary operation type, and RT field were associated with DFS. Multivariate analysis revealed that higher ypT stage (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-3.82; p = 0.049) and ypN stage (HR = 4.7; 95% CI 1.57-14.24; p = 0.006) were associated with inferior DFS. Among clinically node-positive patients, those who received RT to the breast only had a 5-year DFS of 73.7%, whereas those who received RNI achieved a DFS of 59.6% (p = 0.164). There were no differences between the DFS and RNI.

CONCLUSION

In patients with residual TNBC, higher ypT and ypN stages were associated with poorer outcomes after NAC. RNI did not appear to improve DFS. More intensive treatments incorporating systemic therapy and RT should be considered for these patients.

Underuse of Postoperative Radiation After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Standard Radiation Indications

Purpose

Nipple areola complex-sparing surgeries, such as nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), are increasingly used for women with early-stage breast cancer. In the postoperative setting, 2 major indications for postoperative radiation (PORT) with/without regional nodal irradiation (RNI) are: positive margins (margin+) and pathologically involved lymph nodes (pN+). The frequency of these adverse pathologic features and the rate of PORT utilization following NSM for these 2 indications are unknown. We determined the frequency of margin+ and pN+ following NSM compared with nipple-sparing lumpectomy/breast-conserving surgery [BCS] and identified trends in appropriate PORT administration for these standard indications in the NSM setting.

Methods and Materials

Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), women diagnosed with cT1 to cT3,N0M0 invasive carcinoma between 2004 and 2017 who underwent NSM were compared with those who underwent BCS (with nipple preservation). The frequencies of margin+ and pN+ by surgical subtype and use of PORT with/without RNI were assessed by cohort to determine if the type of surgery was associated with radiation delivery. Overall survival between the 2 cohorts was also compared. We performed univariable/multivariable logistic and Cox regression with ORs to control for confounders.

Results

Of 624,075 women included, 611,907 underwent BCS, and 12,168 underwent NSM. The surgical margin+ rate was significantly higher for NSM at 4.5% (n = 544) than for BCS at 3.7% (n = 22,449) (P < .001) and remained significant on multivariable analysis (MVA; OR, 1.13; CI, 1.03-1.25; P = .012). Use of PORT for margins+ was significantly lower by MVA after NSM (OR, 0.07; CI, 0.06-0.09; P < .001). Similarly, pN+ rate was significantly higher for NSM at 22.5% (n = 2740) versus BCS at 13.5% (n = 82,288) (P < .001), retaining significance on MVA (OR, 1.12; CI, 1.06-1.19; P < .001). For pN+ undergoing NSM, PORT with RNI was delivered significantly less often on MVA (OR, 0.73; CI, 0.67-0.81; P < .001). Neither high-risk subgroup had differences in overall survival on MVA.

Conclusions

NSM is associated with a higher rate of margin+ and pN+ compared with BCS. Radiation is underused after NSM for these standard indications. Our results highlight the need to further refine patient selection for NSM and the importance of communicating the higher potential for adverse pathologic features (and thus, the potential need for radiation) to patients undergoing NSM.

Dosimetric Analyses of the Three Radiation Techniques Used in the EORTC 22922/10925 IM-MS Breast Cancer Trial

PURPOSE

The aim of the current study is to compare the dosimetry of 3 radiation therapy (RT) techniques used in the EORTC 22922/10925 trial for irradiating the internal mammary (IM) and medial supraclavicular nodes (MS) using a treatment planning system available nowadays for dose calculation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective dosimetry analysis of anonymised data; thus, ethics approval was not required. Ten cases of left-sided breast were randomly selected for RT planning to a total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The treatment planning was done according to the trial's protocol and under the supervision of the EORTC trial's coordinators. Doses to planning target volumes (PTV) and to organs at risk (OARs) are reported. Data is presented in descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 10 cases and 40 treatment plans (4 plans per case: standard-plan A, modified standard-plan B, individualised-plan C and breast-only-plan D). For all planning techniques, the mean dose to the PTV of the left breast (plan A-D) and the PTV-MS (plan A-C) exceeded 95% of the prescribed dose (>47.5 Gy). The individualised technique (plan C) had a lower coverage for PTV-IM, with a mean of 87% of the prescribed dose compared to ∼102% for plans A and B. The dose to OARs varied between techniques, with the mean heart dose being higher in the standard and modified standard techniques (18.3 and 16.6 Gy, respectively) compared to the individualised technique (9.5 Gy).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3 RT techniques used in the trial varied in target coverage and OARs dose. Our results may help to understand the observed larger absolute benefit of individualised IM-MS treatment planning in terms of breast cancer outcomes.

Post-mastectomy radiation therapy after breast reconstruction: from historic dogmas to practical expert agreements based on a large literature review of surgical and radiation therapy considerations

Breast reconstruction (BR) after mastectomy is important to consider for a woman's body image enhancement and psychological well-being. Although post-mastectomy radiation (PMRT) significantly improves the outcome of patients with high-risk breast cancer (BC), PMRT after BR may affect cosmetic outcomes and may compromise the original goal of improving quality of life (QoL). With the lack of practical guidelines, it seems essential to work on a consensus and provide some "expert agreements" to offer patients the best option for PMRT after BR. We report a global "expert agreement" that results from a critical review of the literature on BR and PMRT during the 6th international multidisciplinary breast conference in March 2023.

RecurIndex-Guided postoperative radiotherapy with or without Avoidance of Irradiation of regional Nodes in 1-3 node-positive breast cancer (RIGAIN): a study protocol for a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled prospective, phase III trial

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer with one to three lymph node metastases, particularly within the pT1-2N1M0 cohort with a low clinical risk of local-regional recurrence (LRR), has incited a discourse surrounding personalised treatment strategies. Multigene testing for Recurrence Index (RecurIndex) model capably differentiates patients based on their level of LRR risk. This research aims to validate whether a more aggressive treatment approach can enhance clinical outcomes in N1 patients who possess a clinically low risk of LRR, yet a high RecurIndex-determined risk of LRR. Specifically, this entails postoperative whole breast irradiation combined with regional lymph node irradiation (RNI) following breast-conserving surgery or chest wall irradiation with RNI after mastectomy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The RIGAIN (RecurIndex-Guided postoperative radiotherapy with or without Avoidance of Irradiation of regional Nodes in 1-3 node-positive breast cancer) Study is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, phase III clinical trial that is being conducted in China. In this study, patients with low clinical LRR risk but high RecurIndex-LRR risk are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the experimental group or the control group. In the experimental group, RNI is performed and the control group omits RNI. Efficacy and safety analyses will be conducted, enrolling a total of 540 patients (270 per group). The primary endpoint is invasive disease-free survival, and secondary endpoints include any first recurrence, LRR-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, recurrence-free survival, overall survival, disease-free survival, breast cancer-specific mortality and assessment of patient quality of life. The study began in April 2023 and with a follow-up period of 60 months after the last participant completes radiation therapy.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University (SYSKY-2022-097-02, V.3.1). It adheres to the Helsinki Declaration and Good Clinical Practice. Research findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04069884.

Post-Operative Radiation in Early Breast Cancer with N1 Disease: 10-Year Follow-Up

Post-operative radiotherapy for post-menopausal women with early breast cancer and N1 disease is controversial. Although locoregional control is improved, overall survival (OS) benefit is unclear. The clinical benefit of post-operative irradiation in this group of patients over 10 years was reviewed. We aimed to evaluate the OS, disease-free survival (DFS), and factors affecting OS and DFS. A retrospective review of 191 post-menopausal women with early breast cancer and N1 disease from 2004 to 2011 was performed. Demographics, post-operative histology, adjuvant treatment, OS, and DFS were evaluated. Post-operative radiation was given to 95 of 191 women (49.7%). Younger age at diagnosis (p < 0.001), a greater number of involved nodes (p = 0.004), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and a higher tumor grade (p = 0.001) were more likely in women who received post-operative radiation. Nodal radiation did not improve 10-year DFS (p = 0.084) or OS (p = 0.203). Post-operative nodal radiation was associated with significant improvement in 10-year OS in women who received only hormonal therapy (p = 0.047) and no other systemic therapy. Women with unfavorable risk factors were more likely to receive post-operative radiation, likely due to a perceived higher risk of recurrence. Nodal radiation did not significantly improve 10-year DFS or OS in early breast cancer patients with N1 disease, and the benefit was not clearly demonstrated. However, in those who were on hormonal therapy, radiotherapy was beneficial in improving overall survival.

Assessment of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy Receipt by Age and Association With Outcomes in Women With Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) reduces locoregional recurrence (LRR) and improves overall survival (OS) in patients with breast cancer. Young age has been recognized as a risk factor for LRR. The primary objective of this study was to determine if recommendations for PMRT differed among patients younger than 50 years as compared to women aged 50 years or older.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of patients with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy with or without PMRT from 2010 through 2018. Univariable and multivariable models were used to estimate the association of age with PMRT.

RESULTS

Of 2471 patients, 839 (34%) were <50 years; 1632 (66%) were ≥50 years. Patients <50 years had a higher percentage of grade 3 tumors, hormone receptor (HR) negative and/or Her-2/neu positive tumors, clinical stage T2/T3 tumors, and nodal involvement. Compared with patients ≥50 years, patients <50 years were more likely to undergo PMRT (OR 1.57; P = .001) and regional node irradiation (RNI) to the internal mammary nodes. Advanced clinical and pathologic stage, invasive tumor histology, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, and treatment with systemic chemotherapy were predictors of PMRT receipt for patients <50 years (P < .05). PMRT was associated with improved OS and recurrence free survival (RFS) among all patients (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Patients <50 years were more likely to undergo PMRT and to receive RNI to the internal mammary nodes but were also more likely to have other risk factors for recurrence that would warrant a PMRT recommendation. PMRT improved OS and RFS for all patients.

Breast Cancer Presenting With Intravascular Tumor Emboli in Axillary Soft Tissue: Recurrence Risk and Radiation Therapy Outcomes

Purpose

Intravascular tumor emboli in axillary soft tissue (ITE) is a rare pathologic finding in breast cancer and is associated with higher axillary nodal disease burden. The independent prognostic and predictive value of this entity is unknown, as is the role of radiation therapy for ITE.

Methods and Materials

We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of breast cancer patients treated from 1992 to 2020. Patients with ITE were matched to those without (1:2) based on propensity scores to control for potential confounding factors. Locoregional (LRR) and distant recurrence (DR) were evaluated using competing risks methods accounting for death as a competing event. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated by Cox regression models. Among patients with ITE, we also evaluated whether RT improved outcomes.

Results

Among 2377 total patients, 129 had ITE, of whom 126 were propensity score matched to 252 without ITE. Median follow-up from time of surgery was 5.5 years (IQR 2.3, 9.7). There were no statistically significant differences in the 5-year incidence of LRR between groups (5.4% [95% CI, 1.6%-13%] with ITE vs 10% [95% CI, 6.7%-15%] without, P = .53) or DR (24% [95% CI, 15% 35%] with ITE vs 21% [95% CI, 16%-27%] without, P = .51). Five-year OS and DFS did not differ between groups (P > .9 for both comparisons, patients with ITE vs without ITE). In analyzing the effect of RT among patients with ITE, receipt of RT was associated with significantly improved DFS (HR, 0.34, 95% CI, 0.12-0.93, P = .04).

Conclusions

Patients with ITE do not exhibit significantly worse LRR, DR, DFS, or OS compared with a propensity-score-matched cohort without ITE. However, among patients with ITE, those who received RT demonstrated significantly improved DFS. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the prognostic and predictive implications of ITE.

Axillary Management: How Much Is Too Much?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the current management of the axilla in breast cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Axillary dissection is no longer indicated in patients with clinically node-negative axilla with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes following upfront surgery or in patients with clinically node-negative axilla following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast cancer has evolved away from routine axillary clearance to the less invasive sentinel lymph node biopsy to now complete omission of axillary sampling in select patients. We will review the most salient evidence that has shaped these practice changes over the last three decades. Current practice controversies are especially relevant for elderly populations and those receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Ongoing clinical trials will provide data to further guide breast cancer surgical management.

Breast Cancer Patient's Outcomes after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery at 5 and 10 Years for Stage II-III Disease

Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer offers the possibility to facilitate breast and axillary surgery; it is a test of chemosensibility in vivo with significant prognostic value and may be used to tailor adjuvant treatment according to the response. Material and Methods: A retrospective single-institution cohort of 482 stage II and III breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on anthracycline and taxans, plus antiHEr2 in Her2-positive cases, was studied. Survival was calculated at 5 and 10 years. Kaplan-Meier curves with a log-rank test were calculated for differences according to age, BRCA status, menopausal status, TNM, pathological and molecular surrogate subtype, 20% TIL cut-off, surgical procedure, response to chemotherapy and the presence of vascular invasion. Results: The pCR rate was 25.3% and was greater in HER2 (51.3%) and TNBC (31.7%) and in BRCA carriers (41.9%). The factors independently related to patient survival were pathology and molecular surrogate subtype, type of surgery, response to NACT and vascular invasion. BRCA status was a protective prognostic factor without reaching statistical significance, with an HR 0.5 (95%CI 0.1-1.4). Mastectomy presented a double risk of distant recurrence compared to breast-conservative surgery (BCS), supporting BCS as a safe option after NACT. After a mean follow-up of 126 (SD 43) months, luminal tumors presented a substantial difference in survival rates calculated at 5 or 10 years (81.2% compared to 74.7%), whereas that for TNBC was 75.3 and 73.5, respectively. The greatest difference was seen according to the response in patients with pCR, who exhibited a 10 years DDFS of 95.5% vs. 72.4% for those patients without pCR, p < 0001. This difference was especially meaningful in TNBC: the 10 years DDFS according to an RCB of 0 to 3 was 100%, 80.6%, 69% and 49.2%, respectively, p < 0001. Patients with a particularly poor prognosis were those with lobular carcinomas, with a 10 years DDFS of 42.9% vs. 79.7% for ductal carcinomas, p = 0.001, and patients with vascular invasion at the surgical specimen, with a 10 years DDFS of 59.2% vs. 83.6% for those patients without vascular invasion, p < 0.001. Remarkably, BRCA carriers presented a longer survival, with an estimated 10 years DDFS of 89.6% vs. 77.2% for non-carriers, p = 0.054. Conclusions: Long-term outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy can help patients and clinicians make well-informed decisions.

Retrospective evaluation of the contribution of radiotherapy to survival in breast cancer treatment with propensity score based on stage and subgroup

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer has been a disease in which treatment strategy has changed over time under the influence of different hypotheses and evidence for more than a century. We analyzed the contribution of radiotherapy to disease-free survival and overall survival by classifying according to stage, 1-3 lymph node involvement, and molecular subgroups.

METHODS

Following the approval of the Institutional Review Board, records of patients with breast cancer who were admitted to University School of Medicine Departments of Radiation Oncology and Medical Oncology between July 1999 and December 2020 were reviewed. Using data propensity score matching was performed between the groups that did and did not receive radiotherapy using an optimal matching algorithm (optimum, 1:1). Disease-free survival and overall survival after propensity score matching were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to estimate hazard ratios.

RESULTS

In the radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy groups, disease-free survival was 257.42 ± 5.46 (246.72- 268.13), 208,96 ± 8,15 (192,97-224,94) months respectively, (p = < 0.001), overall survival was 272,46 ± 8,68 (255,43-289,49), 219,05 ± 7,32 (204,70-233,41) months respectively (p = .002). We compared the 19 N1 patient groups who received radiotherapy with the 19 patients who did not receive radiotherapy and calculated the disease-free survival times was 202,21 ± 10,50 (181,62-222,79) and 148,82 ± 24,91 (99,99-197,65) months respectively (p = .011) and overall survival times was 200,85 ± 12,79 (175,77-225,92) and 166,90 ± 20,39 (126,93-206,82) months respectively (p = .055). We examined disease-free survival and overall survival times in both groups according to Luminal A, Luminal B, TNBC, and HER2-enriched subgroups. In the Luminal B subgroup, the disease-free survival duration in the groups receiving radiotherapy and not receiving radiotherapy was 264.83 ± 4.95 (255.13-274.54) and 187.09 ± 11.06 (165.41-208.78) months (p < .001), and overall survival times were 252.29 ± 10.54 (231.62-272.97) and 197.74 ± 9.72 (178.69-216.80) months (p = .001) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Thanks to studies proving that RT increases long-term survival rates in breast cancer as a result of reducing locoregional recurrence and systemic metastasis rates, it has been understood that the spectrum hypothesis is the hypothesis that most accurately describes breast cancer to date. We found that patients with Luminal B invasive breast cancer benefited significantly more from RT compared to other subgroups.

Dosimetric risk factors for radiation esophagitis in patients with breast cancer following regional nodal radiation

BACKGROUND

Radiation esophagitis (RE) is one of the most common clinical symptoms of regi-onal lymph node radiotherapy for breast cancer. However, there are fewer studies focusing on RE caused by hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT).

AIM

To analyze the clinical and dosimetric factors that contribute to the development of RE in patients with breast cancer treated with HFRT of regional lymph nodes.

METHODS

Between January and December 2022, we retrospectively analysed 64 patients with breast cancer who met our inclusion criteria underwent regional nodal intensity-modulated radiotherapy at a radiotherapy dose of 43.5 Gy/15F.

RESULTS

Of the 64 patients in this study, 24 (37.5%) did not develop RE, 29 (45.3%) developed grade 1 RE (G1RE), 11 (17.2%) developed grade 2 RE (G2RE), and none developed grade 3 RE or higher. Our univariable logistic regression analysis found G2RE to be significantly correlated with the maximum dose, mean dose, relative volume 20-40, and absolute volume (AV) 20-40. Our stepwise linear regression analyses found AV30 and AV35 to be significantly associated with G2RE (P < 0.001). The optimal threshold for AV30 was 2.39 mL [area under the curve (AUC): 0.996; sensitivity: 90.9%; specificity: 91.1%]. The optimal threshold for AV35 was 0.71 mL (AUC: 0.932; sensitivity: 90.9%; specificity: 83.9%).

CONCLUSION

AV30 and AV35 were significantly associated with G2RE. The thresholds for AV30 and AV35 should be limited to 2.39 mL and 0.71 mL, respectively.

The Role of MRI in Breast Cancer and Breast Conservation Therapy

Contrast-enhanced breast MRI has an established role in aiding in the detection, evaluation, and management of breast cancer. This article discusses MRI sequences, the clinical utility of MRI, and how MRI has been evaluated for use in breast radiotherapy treatment planning. We highlight the contribution of MRI in the decision-making regarding selecting appropriate candidates for breast conservation therapy and review the emerging role of MRI-guided breast radiotherapy.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy with simultaneous tumor bed boost (Hi-RISE) in breast cancer patients receiving upfront breast-conserving surgery: study protocol for a phase III randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has been demonstrated in several pivotal randomized trials. However, the feasibility of applying simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the tumor bed and regional node irradiation (RNI) using modern radiotherapy techniques with HFRT needs further evaluation.

METHODS

This prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled, non-inferiority phase III trial aims to determine the non-inferiority of HFRT combined with SIB (HFRTsib) compared with conventional fractionated radiotherapy with sequential boost (CFRTseq) in terms of five-year locoregional control rate in breast cancer patients undergoing upfront BCS. A total of 2904 participants will be recruited and randomized in a 1:1 ratio into the HFRTsib and CFRTseq groups. All patients will receive whole breast irradiation, and those with positive axillary nodes will receive additional RNI, including internal mammary irradiation. The prescribed dose for the HFRTsib group will be 40 Gy in 15 fractions, combined with a SIB of 48 Gy in 15 fractions to the tumor bed. The CFRTseq group will receive 50 Gy in 25 fractions, with a sequential boost of 10 Gy in 5 fractions to the tumor bed.

DISCUSSION

This trial intends to assess the effectiveness and safety of SIB combined with HFRT in early breast cancer patients following BCS. The primary endpoint is locoregional control, and the results of this trial are expected to offer crucial evidence for utilizing HFRT in breast cancer patients after BCS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered at ClincalTrials.gov (NCT04025164) on July 18, 2019.

The impact of the new ESTRO-ACROP target volume delineation guidelines for postmastectomy radiotherapy after implant-based breast reconstruction on breast complications

The European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology-Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice (ESTRO-ACROP) updated a new target volume delineation guideline for postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) after implant-based reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the impact on breast complications with the new guideline compared to the conventional guidelines. In total, 308 patients who underwent PMRT after tissue expander or permanent implant insertion from 2016 to 2021 were included; 184 received PMRT by the new ESTRO-ACROP target delineation (ESTRO-T), and 124 by conventional target delineation (CONV-T). The endpoints were major breast complications (infection, necrosis, dehiscence, capsular contracture, animation deformity, and rupture) requiring re-operation or re-hospitalization and any grade ≥2 breast complications. With a median follow-up of 36.4 months, the cumulative incidence rates of major breast complications at 1, 2, and 3 years were 6.6%, 10.3%, and 12.6% in the ESTRO-T group, and 9.7%, 15.4%, and 16.3% in the CONV-T group; it did not show a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.56). In multivariable analyses, target delineation is not associated with the major complications (sHR = 0.87; p = 0.77). There was no significant difference in any breast complications (3-year incidence, 18.9% vs. 23.3%, respectively; p = 0.56). Symptomatic RT-induced pneumonitis was developed in six (3.2%) and three (2.4%) patients, respectively. One local recurrence occurred in the ESTRO-T group, which was within the ESTRO-target volume. The new ESTRO-ACROP target volume guideline did not demonstrate significant differences in major or any breast complications, although it showed a tendency of reduced complication risks. As the dosimetric benefits of normal organs and comparable oncologic outcomes have been reported, further analyses with long-term follow-up are necessary to evaluate whether it could be connected to better clinical outcomes.

The Japanese breast cancer society clinical practice guidelines for radiation treatment of breast cancer, 2022 edition

The Breast Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines, organized by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS), were published in 2022. We present the English version of the Radiation Therapy (RT) section of the guidelines. The JBCS formed a task force to update the 2018 version of the JBCS Clinical Practice Guidelines. The Background Questions (BQs) contain the standard treatments for breast cancer in clinical practice, whereas the Clinical Questions (CQs) address daily clinical questions that remain controversial. Future Research Questions (FRQs) explore the subjects that are considered important issues, despite there being insufficient data for inclusion as CQs. The task force selected the 12 BQs, 8 CQs, and 6 FRQs for the RT section. For each CQ, systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses were conducted according to the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2020, version 3.0. The recommendations, strength of recommendation, and strength of evidence for each CQ were determined based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and finalized by voting at the recommendation decision meeting.

Prediction of Overall Disease Burden in (y)pN1 Breast Cancer Using Knowledge-Based Machine Learning Model

BACKGROUND

We aimed to construct an expert knowledge-based Bayesian network (BN) model for assessing the overall disease burden (ODB) in (y)pN1 breast cancer patients and compare ODB across arms of ongoing trials.

METHODS

Utilizing institutional data and expert surveys, we developed a BN model for (y)pN1 breast cancer. Expert-derived probabilities and disability weights for radiotherapy-related benefit (e.g., 7-year disease-free survival [DFS]) and toxicities were integrated into the model. ODB was defined as the sum of disability weights multiplied by probabilities. In silico predictions were conducted for Alliance A011202, PORT-N1, RAPCHEM, and RT-CHARM trials, comparing ODB, 7-year DFS, and side effects.

RESULTS

In the Alliance A011202 trial, 7-year DFS was 80.1% in both arms. Axillary lymph node dissection led to higher clinical lymphedema and ODB compared to sentinel lymph node biopsy with full regional nodal irradiation (RNI). In the PORT-N1 trial, the control arm (whole-breast irradiation [WBI] with RNI or post-mastectomy radiotherapy [PMRT]) had an ODB of 0.254, while the experimental arm (WBI alone or no PMRT) had an ODB of 0.255. In the RAPCHEM trial, the radiotherapy field did not impact the 7-year DFS in ypN1 patients. However, there was a mild ODB increase with a larger irradiation field. In the RT-CHARM trial, we identified factors associated with the major complication rate, which ranged from 18.3% to 22.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

The expert knowledge-based BN model predicted ongoing trial outcomes, validating reported results and assumptions. In addition, the model demonstrated the ODB in different arms, with an emphasis on quality of life.

A Questionnaire Survey of Current Practice in the Management of Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer

Nita S. NairBackground  Radiotherapy (RT) is an important modality in the management of breast cancers (BC). Large randomized trials have suggested that prophylactic regional nodal irradiation inclusive of internal mammary lymph nodes (IMLN) reduces BC-related mortality. However, the adoption of IMLN-RT has been variable due to relative benefits and toxicity concerns. Methods  A survey was emailed to radiation oncologists (ROs) across the country wherein they were asked about their practice regarding IMLN-RT in BC. Results  We received 128 responses, which included radiation oncologists across both private institutions (PIs) and government institutions (GIs). Fifty-six (43.8%) routinely offer prophylactic(p) IMLN-RT and an additional 15 (11.71%) suggested they would have offered it in the absence of logistic constraints. Almost all, 121 (94.5%) radiate the IMLN in case of radiologically positive lymph nodes (LNs). Fifty-six ROs (43.8%) offered prophylactic IMLN-RT in node-negative disease. Among those who did not offer IMLN-RT, most (84.72%) felt the clinical evidence was equivocal. Of the 56 who offered pIMLN-RT, 34/56 (60.71%) offered to locally advanced tumors, 20/56 (35.71%) offered to all inner and central tumors (ICQT), 29/56 (51.78%) to > 4 axillary LN-positive and 9/56 (16.07%) to any axillary LN-positive. The majority, i.e., 36/56 (64.28%) radiated upper three intercostal spaces, 9 (16.07%) radiated upper five intercostal spaces, and 6 (10.9%) decided based on tumor location, while 5 (9%) irradiated one space below the involved space. Overall, simulation-based planning was undertaken in 99% of PIs as opposed to 89% of GIs ( p  = 0.03). The majority of ROs, i.e., 92 (72.4%) preferred IMRT to IMLN-RT. In addition, the surgical approach to IMLN was practiced by surgeons at 18 (14%) centers, of which 13 (72.22%) operated the IMLN when radiologically evident. The IMLN dissection was preferentially performed for second and third intercostal spaces as suggested in 10 (55.55%) responses, while 8 (44.44%) performed thoracoscopic dissection of the IMLN chain. The distribution of prophylactic, definitive IMLN-RT, and IMLN dissection did not differ significantly between GI and PI ( p  = NS). Conclusion  pIMLN-RT is still not the standard protocol in most centers citing equivocal evidence in the literature. Logistics, though different in GIs and PIs, did not impact the decision of pIMLN-RT. Further efforts would be required to standardize practice in IMLN across India.

Does Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy Confer Survival Benefits on Patients With 1-3 Clinically Positive Lymph Nodes Rendered Pathologically Negative After Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy: Consensus from A Pooled Analysis?

The advent of taxane-based chemotherapy has revolutionized breast cancer care. This advance has helped improve the response to downstaging tumors that might otherwise be inoperable. It has also helped in rendering clinically (cN+) positive lymph nodes (LNs) pathologically negative (ypN0). The standard of care for cN+ patients included post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), regardless of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, PMRT in patients with 1-3 positive LNs still lacks definitive guidelines. Numerous retrospective results have been inconclusive about the benefit of PMRT on survival in patients with 1-3 positive LNs. This pooled analysis attempts to reach a consensus. The PubMed database was searched through October 2023. The search yielded 27 papers, of which 11 satisfied the inclusion criteria. The locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) for each study were tabulated when given, and two groups were created, the PMRT and NO PMRT, respectively. The results were then pooled for analysis. The total number of patients was 8340, 4136 in the PMRT group, and 4204 in the NO PMRT group, respectively. The LRRFS, DFS, and OS were 96.9%, 82.1%, and 87.3% for the PMRT group and 93.2%, 79.6%, and 84.8% for the NO PMRT group, respectively. There was no statistical significance in LRRFS, DFS, or OS between the two groups (p = 0.61, p = 0.61, and p = 0.38, respectively). PMRT does not seem to confer survival benefits in patients with pN1 rendered ypN0 for stages T1-3. This pooled analysis's findings should be confirmed prospectively with a longer period of follow-up.

Radiotherapy for breast cancer

In early breast cancer, adjuvant moderately hypofractionated regimens are recommended for both whole breast, partial breast and locoregional irradiation which abbreviates the overall treatment time, as argued in this review. Gating is recommended as well as the use of a simultaneous integrated boost when indicated. A tangential field set-up is standard, however, for challenging cases volumetric modulated arc therapy techniques, or referral for proton therapy, may be considered. In the metastatic setting, stereotactic radiotherapy is a promising treatment option for oligometastatic disease.

Estimating the risk and benefit of radiation therapy in (y)pN1 stage breast cancer patients: A Bayesian network model incorporating expert knowledge (KROG 22-13)

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the risk and benefit of (y)pN1 breast cancer patients in a Bayesian network model.

METHOD

We developed a Bayesian network (BN) model comprising three parts: pretreatment, intervention, and risk/benefit. The pretreatment part consisted of clinical information from a tertiary medical center. The intervention part regarded the field of radiotherapy. The risk/benefit component encompasses radiotherapy (RT)-related side effects and effectiveness, including factors such as recurrence, cardiac toxicity, lymphedema, and radiation pneumonitis. These factors were evaluated in terms of disability weights and probabilities from a nationwide expert survey. The overall disease burden (ODB) was calculated as the sum of the probability multiplied by the disability weight. A higher value of ODB indicates a greater disease burden for the patient.

RESULTS

Among the 58 participants, a BN model utilizing discretization and clustering techniques revealed five distinct clusters. Overall, factors associated with breast reconstruction and RT exhibited high discrepancies (24-34 %), while RT-related side effects demonstrated low discrepancies (3-11 %) among the experts. When incorporating recurrence and RT-related side effects, the mean ODB of (y)pN1 patients was 0.258 (range, 0.244-0.337), with a higher tendency observed in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or mastectomy cases. The ODB for TNBC patients undergoing mastectomy without postmastectomy radiotherapy was 0.327, whereas for non-TNBC patients undergoing breast conserving surgery with RT, the disease burden was 0.251. There was an increasing trend in ODB as the field of RT increased.

CONCLUSION

We developed a Bayesian network model based on an expert survey, which helps to understand treatment patterns and enables precise estimations of RT-related risk and benefit in (y)pN1 patients.

Normal tissue complication probability models of hypothyroidism after radiotherapy for breast cancer

Purpose

We aimed to develop Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) and multivariable normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models to predict the risk of radiation-induced hypothyroidism (RIHT) in breast cancer patients.

Materials and methods

A total of 1,063 breast cancer patients who underwent whole breast irradiation between 2009 and 2016 were analyzed. Individual dose-volume histograms were used to generate LKB and multivariable logistic regression models. LKB model was fit using the thyroid radiation dose-volume parameters. A multivariable model was constructed to identify potential dosimetric and clinical parameters associated with RIHT. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping techniques, and model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) goodness-of-fit test.

Results

RIHT developed in 4 % of patients with a median follow-up of 77.7 months. LKB and multivariable NTCP models exhibited significant agreement between the predicted and observed results (HL P values > 0.05). The multivariable NTCP model outperformed the LKB model in predicting RIHT (AUC 0.62 vs. 0.54). In the multivariable model, systemic therapy, age, and percentage of thyroid volume receiving ≥ 10 Gy (V10) were significant prognostic factors for RIHT. The cumulative incidence of RIHT was significantly higher in patients who exceeded the cut-off values for all three risk predictors (systemic therapy, age ≥ 40 years, and thyroid V10 ≥ 26 %, P < 0.005).

Conclusions

Systemic therapy, age, and V10 of the thyroid were identified as strong risk factors for the development of RIHT. Our NTCP models provide valuable insights to clinicians for predicting and preventing hypothyroidism by identifying high-risk patients.

Deep inspirational breast hold (DIBH) for right breast irradiation: Improved sparing of liver and lung tissue

Objective

To reduce liver and lung dose during right breast irradiation while maintaining optimal dose to the target volume. This dose reduction has the potential to decrease acute side effects and long-term toxicity.

Materials and Methods

16 patients treated with radiation therapy for localized carcinoma of the right breast were included retrospectively. For the planning CT, each patient was immobilised on an indexed board with the arms placed above the head. CT scans were acquired in free-breathing (FB) as well as with deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH). Both scans were acquired with the same length. Planning target volumes (PTV's) were created with a 5 mm margin from the respective clinical target volumes (CTV's) on both CT datasets. The liver was outlined as scanned. Dose metrics evaluated were as follows: differences in PTV coverage, dose to the liver (max, mean, V90%, V50%, V30%), dose to lung (mean, V20Gy, relative electron density) and dose to heart (Dmax). The p-values were calculated using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. A p-value was significant when <0.05.

Results

Differences in PTV coverage between plans using FB and DIBH were less than 2 %. Maximum liver dose was significantly less using DIBH: 17.5 Gy versus FB: 40.3 Gy (p < 0.001). The volume of the liver receiving 10 % of the dose was significantly less using DIBH with 1.88 cm3 versus 72.2 cm3 under FB (p < 0.001). The absolute volume receiving 20 Gy in the right lung was larger using DIBH: 291 cm3 versus 230 cm3 under FB (p < 0.001) and the relative volume of lung receiving dose greater than 20 Gy was smaller with DIBH: 11.5 % versus 14 % in FB (p = 0.007). The relative electron density of lung was significantly less with DIBH: 0.59 versus 0.62 with FB, (p < 0.001). This suggests that the lung receives less dose due to its lower density when using DIBH.

Conclusion

Radiation of the right breast using DIBH spares liver and lung tissue significantly and thus carries the potential of best practice for right sided breast cancer.

Novel immunotherapies for breast cancer: Focus on 2023 findings

Immunotherapy has emerged as a revolutionary approach in cancer therapy, and recent advancements hold significant promise for breast cancer (BCa) management. Employing the patient's immune system to combat BCa has become a focal point in immunotherapeutic investigations. Strategies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), adoptive cell transfer (ACT), and targeting the tumor microenvironment (TME) have disclosed encouraging clinical outcomes. ICIs, particularly programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitors, exhibit efficacy in specific BCa subtypes, including triple-negative BCa (TNBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive cancers. ACT approaches, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, showed promising clinical outcomes in enhancing tumor recognition and elimination. Targeting the TME through immune agonists and oncolytic viruses signifies a burgeoning field of research. While challenges persist in patient selection, resistance mechanisms, and combination therapy optimization, these novel immunotherapies hold transformative potential for BCa treatment. Continued research and clinical trials are imperative to refine and implement these innovative approaches, paving the way for improved outcomes and revolutionizing the management of BCa. This review provides a concise overview of the latest immunotherapies (2023 studies) in BCa, highlighting their potential and current status.

Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) clinical practice guidance for the prevention of breast cancer-related arm lymphoedema (BCRAL): international Delphi consensus-based recommendations

Background

Developing strategies to prevent breast cancer-related arm lymphoedema (BCRAL) is a critical unmet need because there are no effective interventions to eradicate it once it reaches a chronic state. Certain strategies such as prospective surveillance programs and prophylactic lymphatic reconstruction have been reported to be effective in clinical trials. However, a large variation exists in practice based on clinician preference, organizational standards, and local resources.

Methods

A two-round international Delphi consensus process was performed from February 27, 2023 to May 25, 2023 to compile opinions of 55 experts involved in the care and research of breast cancer and lymphoedema on such interventions.

Findings

Axillary lymph node dissection, use of post-operative radiotherapy, relative within-arm volume increase one month after surgery, greater number of lymph nodes dissected, and high body mass index were recommended as the most important risk factors to guide selection of patients for interventions to prevent BCRAL. The panel recommended that prospective surveillance programs should be implemented to screen for and reduce risks of BCRAL where feasible and resources allow. Prophylactic compression sleeves, axillary reverse mapping and prophylactic lymphatic reconstruction should be offered for patients who are at risk for developing BCRAL as options where expertise is available and resources allow. Recommendations on axillary management in clinical T1-2, node negative breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes were also provided by the expert panel. Routine axillary lymph node dissection should not be offered in these patients who receive breast conservation therapy. Axillary radiation instead of axillary lymph node dissection should be considered in the same group of patients undergoing mastectomy.

Interpretation

An individualised approach based on patients' preferences, risk factors for BCRAL, availability of treatment options and expertise of the healthcare team is paramount to ensure patients at risk receive preventive interventions for BCRAL, regardless of where they are receiving care.

Funding

This study was not supported by any funding. RJC received investigator grant support from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1194051).

Treatment of Internal Mammary Nodes is Associated With Improved Overall Survival in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The role of internal mammary nodal irradiation (IMNI) as a component of regional nodal radiotherapy is a controversial issue in breast radiation oncology with conflicting results presented in recent landmark trials. We thus created a meta-analysis of available data to better ascertain the potential benefit of IMNI. We hypothesize that with the increased power available within a meta-analysis, IMNI will prove to improve overall survival (OS) in breast cancer.

METHODS

Literature search was conducted for prospective studies comparing IMNI to no IMNI. Primary endpoint was OS and secondary endpoints included local recurrence, regional recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer mortality (BCM), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), grade 2+ skin toxicity, cardiac events, and pneumonitis events. Subgroup analyses were performed for tumor location (medial/central vs. lateral), and nodal status (pN+ vs. pN0). Fixed-effect model was used if there was no heterogeneity, random-effects model otherwise.

RESULTS

Four studies with a total of 5258 patients (IMNI: n=2592; control: n=2666) were included in the study. Pooled results showed IMNI significantly improved OS for all-comers (hazard ratio [HR]=0.89; 95% CI 0.81-0.97; P =0.008), as well as subgroups of pN+ with medial/central tumor location (HR=0.84; 95% CI 0.73-0.96; P =0.01) and pN+ with lateral tumor location (HR=0.87; 95% CI 0.77-0.99; P =0.04). There was no significant difference in OS for subgroups of pN0 and medial/central tumor location. There was no difference in local recurrence, but regional recurrence was significantly improved ( P =0.04). Endpoints of DFS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.99 P =0.03), BCM (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.98, P =0.03), and DMFS (HR=0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98; P =0.02) were all improved with IMNI. Grade 2+ skin toxicity, cardiac events and pneumonitis events were not significantly different between patient in the IMNI and no IMNI groups.

CONCLUSION

Inclusion of IMN irradiation improves OS, DFS, BCM, and DMFS in breast cancer. Largest effect on OS was noted in the subgroup of patients with pN+ and medial/central tumor location.

Comparative Evaluation of Proton Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Brachial Plexus Sparing in the Comprehensive Reirradiation of High-Risk Recurrent Breast Cancer

Purpose

Recurrent or new primary breast cancer requiring comprehensive regional nodal irradiation after prior radiation therapy (RT) to the supraclavicular area and upper axilla is challenging due to cumulative brachial plexus (BP) dose tolerance. We assessed BP dose sparing achieved with pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT) and photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

Methods and Materials

In an institutional review board-approved planning study, all patients with ipsilateral recurrent breast cancer treated with PBS-PT re-RT (PBT1) with at least partial BP overlap from prior photon RT were identified. Comparative VMAT plans (XRT1) using matched BP dose constraints were developed. A second pair of proton (PBT2) and VMAT (XRT2) plans using standardized target volumes were created, applying uniform prescription dose of 50.4 per 1.8 Gy and a maximum BP constraint <25 Gy. Incidence of brachial plexopathy was also assessed.

Results

Ten consecutive patients were identified. Median time between RT courses was 48 months (15-276). Median first, second, and cumulative RT doses were 50.4 Gy (range, 42.6-60.0), 50.4 Gy relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) (45.0-64.4), and 102.4 Gy (RBE) (95.0-120.0), respectively. Median follow-up was 15 months (5-33) and 18 months for living patients (11-33) Mean BP max was 37.5 Gy (RBE) for PBT1 and 36.9 Gy for XRT1. Target volume coverage of V85% (volume receiving 85% of prescription dose), V90%, and V95% were numerically lower for XRT1 versus PBT1. Similarly, axilla I-III and supraclavicular area coverage were significantly higher for PBT2 than XRT2 at dose levels of V55%, V65%, V75%, V85%, and V95%. Only axilla I V55% did not reach significance (P = .06) favoring PBS-PT. Two patients with high cumulative BPmax (95.2 Gy [RBE], 101.6 Gy [RBE]) developed brachial plexopathy symptoms with ulnar nerve distribution neuropathy without pain or weakness (1 of 2 had symptom resolution after 6 months without intervention).

Conclusions

PBS-PT improved BP sparing and target volume coverage versus VMAT. For patients requiring comprehensive re-RT for high-risk, nonmetastatic breast cancer recurrence with BP overlap and reasonable expectation for prolonged life expectancy, PBT may be the preferred treatment modality.

Exploring Helium Ions' Potential for Post-Mastectomy Left-Sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Proton therapy presents a promising modality for treating left-sided breast cancer due to its unique dose distribution. Helium ions provide increased conformality thanks to a reduced lateral scattering. Consequently, the potential clinical benefit of both techniques was explored. An explorative treatment planning study involving ten patients, previously treated with VMAT (Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy) for 50 Gy in 25 fractions for locally advanced, node-positive breast cancer, was carried out using proton pencil beam therapy with a fixed relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 and helium therapy with a variable RBE described by the mMKM (modified microdosimetric kinetic model). Results indicated that target coverage was improved with particle therapy for both the clinical target volume and especially the internal mammary lymph nodes compared to VMAT. Median dose value analysis revealed that proton and helium plans provided lower dose on the left anterior descending artery (LAD), heart, lungs and right breast than VMAT. Notably, helium therapy exhibited improved ipsilateral lung sparing over protons. Employing NTCP models as available in the literature, helium therapy showed a lower probability of grade ≤ 2 radiation pneumonitis (22% for photons, 5% for protons and 2% for helium ions), while both proton and helium ions reduce the probability of major coronary events with respect to VMAT.

Pectoralis Muscle Dosimetry and Posttreatment Rehabilitation Utilization for Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Up to 50% of women treated for localized breast cancer will experience some degree of arm or shoulder morbidity. Although radiation is thought to contribute to this morbidity, the mechanism remains unclear. Prior studies have shown biologic and radiographic changes in the pectoralis muscles after radiation. This study thus aimed to investigate the relationship between radiation to the pectoralis muscles and referrals for rehabilitation services posttreatment for arm and shoulder morbidity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective 1:1 matched case-control study was conducted for patients with breast cancer who were and were not referred for breast or shoulder rehabilitation services between 2014 and 2019 at a single academic institution. Patients were included if they had a lumpectomy and adjuvant radiation. Patients who underwent an axillary lymph node dissection were excluded. Cohorts were matched based on age, axillary surgery, and use of radiation boost. Muscle doses were converted to equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions assuming an α:β ratio of 2.5 and were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 50 patients of a median age 60 years (interquartile range, 53-68 years), 36 patients (72%) underwent a sentinel lymph node biopsy in addition to a lumpectomy. Although pectoralis muscle doses were generally higher in those receiving rehabilitation services, this was not statistically significant. Pectoralis major V20-40 Gy reached borderline significance, as did pectoralis major mean dose (17.69 vs 20.89 Gy; P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

In this limited cohort of patients, we could not definitively conclude a relationship between pectoralis muscle doses and use of rehabilitation services. Given the borderline significant findings, this should be further investigated in a larger cohort.

Outcomes with and without postmastectomy radiotherapy for pT3N0-1M0 breast cancer: An institutional experience

AIM

The objective of this study is to comprehensively evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in treating patients with pT3N0-1M0 breast cancer within the context of modern therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

Clinical data from patients with pT3N0-1M0 breast cancer who underwent mastectomy from January 2005 to December 2018 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The study involved a total of 222 participants, with 112 individuals undergoing PMRT and 110 individuals not receiving it. The median follow-up duration was 77 months (range: 6-171 months). The entire cohort demonstrated 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of 85.1% and 91.0%, respectively, along with a locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate as low as 7.2%. The PMRT group showed significantly better 5-year DFS (90.2% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.02) and OS (95.5% vs. 86.4%, p = 0.012) rates, as well as a lower LRR rate (4.5% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.122), compared to the group without PMRT. Cox regression analysis confirmed the independent prognostic significance of PMRT for both DFS (p = 0.040) and OS (p = 0.047). Following propensity score matching (PSM), the analysis included 100 matched patients, revealing an improved prognosis for those who received PMRT (DFS: p = 0.067; OS: p = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals favorable prognoses for pT3N0-1M0 breast cancer patients treated within contemporary therapeutic approaches. The pivotal role of PMRT in this context is evident. However, due to the retrospective design of our study and the relatively limited sample size, further investigation is imperative to validate and enhance these initial findings.

What's new in surgical oncology breast

It is on the backdrop of advances in tumor biology and systemic therapy for breast cancer, that progress in locoregional treatment has focused on management of the breast for invasive cancer, imaging for staging and therapeutic decision-making, and de-escalation in the management of the axilla.

Impact of breath hold on regional nodal irradiation and heart volume in field in left breast cancer adjuvant irradiation

PURPOSE

Compared to the free-breathing technique, adjuvant left breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy using the breath-hold method significantly reduces the heart mean dose, Left anterior descending artery, and ipsilateral lung doses. Movement with deep inspiration may also reduce heart volume in the field and regional node doses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pre-radiotherapy planning CT was performed in the free-breathing, and breath-hold techniques using RPM, demographic information, clinicopathological data, heart volume in the field, heart mean dose, LAD mean dose, and regional nodal doses were calculated in both free breathing and DIBH. Fifty patients with left breast cancer receiving left breast adjuvant radiation were enrolled.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in axillary LN coverage between the two techniques, except for SCL maximum dose, Axilla I node maximum dose, and Axilla II minimum dose in favor of the breath hold technique. The mean age was 47.54 years, 78% had GII IDC, 66% had positive LVSI results, and 74% of patients had T2. The breath hold strategy resulted in considerably decreased mean heart dose (p = 0.000), LAD dose (p = 0.000), ipsilateral lung mean dose (p = 0.012), and heart volume if the field (p = 0.013). The mean cardiac dosage and the dose of the LAD were significantly correlated (p = 0.000, R = 0.673). Heart volume in the field and heart mean dosage was not significantly correlated (p = 0.285, r = - 0.108).

CONCLUSION

When compared to free breathing scans, DIBH procedures result in considerably reduced dosage to the OAR and no appreciable changes in dose exposure to regional lymph node stations in patients with left-sided breast cancer.

De-escalation of Post-mastectomy Irradiation in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer with One to Three Positive Nodes

BACKGROUND

The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) is used to predict benefit from chemotherapy in hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer with one to three positive lymph nodes. Prospective-retrospective studies have shown that the RS is prognostic for both systemic and locoregional recurrence in tamoxifen-treated patients. We aimed to assess whether RS could be utilized to predict a survival benefit from postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify women ≤ 75 years of age with HR+, HER2-negative, T1-3, N1, M0 breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and axillary staging with available RS during the years 2010-2016. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify association between treatment and overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify variables correlating with PMRT and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 8907 patients were identified. Of the total, 3203 (36%) patients received adjuvant PMRT and 5704 (64%) did not. Across the entire cohort, 5-year OS was 97.5% for patients receiving PMRT and 96.8% for those who did not (P = 0.063). After adjusting for all covariates, in patients with RS ≤ 25, there was no statistically significant improvement in 5-year OS with the addition of adjuvant PMRT (97.5% versus 98.1% P = 0.093). Moreover, no survival benefit was seen with axillary node dissection (P = 0.58) or with the addition of chemotherapy (P = 0.312).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort of patients with one to three positive nodes and a RS ≤ 25, omission of post-mastectomy radiation therapy had no impact on OS. Our results suggest that RS may be utilized in the individualized decision making on PMRT.

Benefit of postoperative regional nodal irradiation in patients receiving preoperative systemic therapy with docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab/pertuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer

AIM

The role of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) after preoperative systemic treatment (PST) with targeted therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the impact of RNI on locoregional recurrence (LRR) and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes after docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab/pertuzumab (TCHP) for PST.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 255 patients who were treated with six cycles of TCHP between 2016 and 2019. The patients were divided into four groups based on clinical nodal involvement: group A, with no nodal disease; group B, with axillary lymph node (AXL) level I; group C, with AXL level I with II/III; and group D, with supraclavicular or internal mammary nodes.

RESULTS

The RNI group had more advanced nodal disease (C/D) than the no RNI group (56.9 % vs. 6.8 %). With a median follow-up of 51.3 months, there were two (0.8 %), three (1.2 %), and 15 (5.9 %) local, regional, and distant metastases, respectively. LRR did not differ significantly according to the RNI (2.6 % vs. 1.0 %, p = 0.651). Group D had the most frequent distant metastases (17.5 %; p = 0.005). The 4-year DFS rate was 92.7 %, and DFS did not improve significantly after RNI (p = 0.074). When stratified by clinical nodal groups and pathological axillary response, RNI had no effect on LRR/DFS outcomes.

CONCLUSION

With a rare incidence of LRR, RNI did not significantly affect LRR or DFS in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer after with PST-TCHP. However, intensive systemic treatment is required for advanced diseases (C/D). Selective de-intensified RNI and intensified systemic treatment should be investigated in future studies.

Postmastectomy Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy: 5-Year Oncologic and Patient-Reported Outcomes

PURPOSE

To report oncologic, physician-assessed, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for a group of women homogeneously treated with modern, skin-sparing multifield optimized pencil-beam scanning proton (intensity modulated proton therapy [IMPT]) postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed consecutive patients who received unilateral, curative-intent, conventionally fractionated IMPT PMRT between 2015 and 2019. Strict constraints were applied to limit the dose to the skin and other organs at risk. Five-year oncologic outcomes were analyzed. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated as part of a prospective registry at baseline, completion of PMRT, and 3 and 12 months after PMRT.

RESULTS

A total of 127 patients were included. One hundred nine (86%) received chemotherapy, among whom 82 (65%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 4.1 years. Five-year locoregional control was 98.4% (95% CI, 93.6-99.6), and overall survival was 87.9% (95% CI, 78.7-96.5). Acute grade 2 and 3 dermatitis was seen in 45% and 4% of patients, respectively. Three patients (2%) experienced acute grade 3 infection, all of whom had breast reconstruction. Three late grade 3 adverse events occurred: morphea (n = 1), infection (n = 1), and seroma (n = 1). There were no cardiac or pulmonary adverse events. Among the 73 patients at risk for PMRT-associated reconstruction complications, 7 (10%) experienced reconstruction failure. Ninety-five patients (75%) enrolled in the prospective PRO registry. The only metrics to increase by >1 point were skin color (mean change: 5) and itchiness (2) at treatment completion and tightness/pulling/stretching (2) and skin color (2) at 12 months. There was no significant change in the following PROs: bleeding/leaking fluid, blistering, telangiectasia, lifting, arm extension, or bending/straightening the arm.

CONCLUSIONS

With strict dose constraints to skin and organs at risk, postmastectomy IMPT was associated with excellent oncologic outcomes and PROs. Rates of skin, chest wall, and reconstruction complications compared favorably to previous proton and photon series. Postmastectomy IMPT warrants further investigation in a multi-institutional setting with careful attention to planning techniques.

Wide Tangent Photon Field Versus Electron Field in the Treatment of Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes in Patients With Left Breast Cancer: A Decision-Making Flowchart

Purpose

This study of internal mammary lymph node chain (IMC) irradiation in patients with left breast cancer aimed at comparing the merits of using, on one hand, a dedicated direct IMC electron field versus a wide tangent photon field covering both breast and IMC on the other. The objective was to produce guidelines allowing clinicians to readily determine the preferred method for each patient.

Methods and Materials

For 19 patients with cancer of the left breast/chest wall, we produced 2 treatment plans each using a different technique: the electron technique using 2 standard opposed photon tangents covering only the breast or chest wall along with a matching adjacent electron field targeting the IMC only or the wide tangent technique using 2 opposed wide tangents covering simultaneously IMC and breast or chest wall. All plans were then optimized for acceptable target coverage.

Results

For patients where the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was located outside of the wide tangent fields (13 patients), the wide tangent technique resulted in lower dose to the LAD, left lung, and heart. When the LAD was inside the wide tangents (6 patients), dose was lower with the electron technique for LAD and heart. In all cases, regardless of LAD location, the wide tangent technique returned strictly superior dose homogeneity but much higher right (contralateral) breast dose.

Conclusions

A flowchart was produced based on LAD location that allows the clinician to readily determine the preferred technique for each patient without having to perform and compare 2 treatment plans, thus saving valuable planning time.

De-escalated radiotherapy for HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes undergoing anti-HER2 targeted therapy

Background

In the era of anti-HER2 targeted therapy, the potential clinical feasibility of considering HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cases presenting with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes as low-risk, and thereby contemplating postoperative radiotherapy reduction, remains an important subject for in-depth examination. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of de-escalated radiotherapy in T1-2N1M0 HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients receiving anti-HER2 targeted therapy. Specifically, omitting regional lymph node irradiation (RNI) after breast-conserving surgery and only performing whole-breast irradiation or omitting postmastectomy radiation therapy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 429 patients with stage T1-2N1M0 primary invasive HER2-overexpressing breast cancer from our center between 2004 and 2018. Patients who received anti-HER2 targeted therapy were divided into an RNI group and a no RNI group to assess the role of RNI. The prognostic role of RNI was investigated via the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results

The median follow-up time was 46.8 months (range 7.1-225.8 months). In the anti-HER2 targeted therapy group RNI yielded no significant improvements in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) (p = 0.940), local-regional recurrence-free survival (p = 0.380), distant metastases-free survival (p = 0.698), or overall survival (p = 0.403). Estrogen receptor (ER) status (hazard ratio [HR] 0.105, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.023-0.749, p = 0.004) and lymph vascular invasion status (LVI) (HR 5.721, 95% CI 1.586-20.633, p = 0.008) were identified as independent prognostic factors for IDFS, and ER-positive and LVI-negative patients exhibited better prognoses.

Conclusion

Omitting RNI may be a safe option in T1-2N1 HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients receiving standardized anti-HER2 targeted therapy; particularly in ER-positive or LVI-negative subgroups.

One versus three weeks hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer treatment: the FAST-Forward phase III RCT

Background

FAST-Forward aimed to identify a 5-fraction schedule of adjuvant radiotherapy delivered in 1 week that was non-inferior in terms of local cancer control and as safe as the standard 15-fraction regimen after primary surgery for early breast cancer. Published acute toxicity and 5-year results are presented here with other aspects of the trial.

Design

Multicentre phase III non-inferiority trial. Patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast (pT1-3pN0-1M0) after breast conservation surgery or mastectomy randomised (1 : 1 : 1) to 40 Gy in 15 fractions (3 weeks), 27 Gy or 26 Gy in 5 fractions (1 week) whole breast/chest wall (Main Trial). Primary endpoint was ipsilateral breast tumour relapse; assuming 2% 5-year incidence for 40 Gy, non-inferiority pre-defined as < 1.6% excess for 5-fraction schedules (critical hazard ratio = 1.81). Normal tissue effects were assessed independently by clinicians, patients and photographs.

Sub-studies

Two acute skin toxicity sub-studies were undertaken to confirm safety of the test schedules. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients with grade ≥ 3 acute breast skin toxicity at any time from the start of radiotherapy to 4 weeks after completion. Nodal Sub-Study patients had breast/chest wall plus axillary radiotherapy testing the same three schedules, reduced to the 40 and 26 Gy groups on amendment, with the primary endpoint of 5-year patient-reported arm/hand swelling.

Limitations

A sequential hypofractionated or simultaneous integrated boost has not been studied.

Participants

Ninety-seven UK centres recruited 4096 patients (1361:40 Gy, 1367:27 Gy, 1368:26 Gy) into the Main Trial from November 2011 to June 2014. The Nodal Sub-Study recruited an additional 469 patients from 50 UK centres. One hundred and ninety and 162 Main Trial patients were included in the acute toxicity sub-studies.

Results

Acute toxicity sub-studies evaluable patients: (1) acute grade 3 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity reported in 40 Gy/15 fractions 6/44 (13.6%); 27 Gy/5 fractions 5/51 (9.8%); 26 Gy/5 fractions 3/52 (5.8%). (2) Grade 3 common toxicity criteria for adverse effects toxicity reported for one patient. At 71-month median follow-up in the Main Trial, 79 ipsilateral breast tumour relapse events (40 Gy: 31, 27 Gy: 27, 26 Gy: 21); hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) versus 40 Gy were 27 Gy: 0.86 (0.51 to 1.44), 26 Gy: 0.67 (0.38 to 1.16). With 2.1% (1.4 to 3.1) 5-year incidence ipsilateral breast tumour relapse after 40 Gy, estimated absolute differences versus 40 Gy (non-inferiority test) were -0.3% (-1.0-0.9) for 27 Gy (p = 0.0022) and -0.7% (-1.3-0.3) for 26 Gy (p = 0.00019). Five-year prevalence of any clinician-assessed moderate/marked breast normal tissue effects was 40 Gy: 98/986 (9.9%), 27 Gy: 155/1005 (15.4%), 26 Gy: 121/1020 (11.9%). Across all clinician assessments from 1 to 5 years, odds ratios versus 40 Gy were 1.55 (1.32 to 1.83; p < 0.0001) for 27 Gy and 1.12 (0.94-1.34; p = 0.20) for 26 Gy. Patient and photographic assessments showed higher normal tissue effects risk for 27 Gy versus 40 Gy but not for 26 Gy. Nodal Sub-Study reported no arm/hand swelling in 80% and 77% in 40 Gy and 26 Gy at baseline, and 73% and 76% at 24 months. The prevalence of moderate/marked arm/hand swelling at 24 months was 10% versus 7% for 40 Gy compared with 26 Gy.

Interpretation

Five-year local tumour incidence and normal tissue effects prevalence show 26 Gy in 5 fractions in 1 week is a safe and effective alternative to 40 Gy in 15 fractions for patients prescribed adjuvant local radiotherapy after primary surgery for early-stage breast cancer.

Future work

Ten-year Main Trial follow-up is essential. Inclusion in hypofractionation meta-analysis ongoing. A future hypofractionated boost trial is strongly supported.

Trial registration

FAST-Forward was sponsored by The Institute of Cancer Research and was registered as ISRCTN19906132.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 09/01/47) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 25. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Breast Cancer: An Overview of Current Therapeutic Strategies, Challenge, and Perspectives

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of death among female patients, which seriously threatens the health of women in the whole world. The treatments of breast cancer require the cooperation of a multidisciplinary setting and taking tumor load and molecular makers into account. For early breast cancer, breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy or mastectomy alone remains the standard management, and the administration of adjuvant systemic therapy is decided by the status of lymph nodes, hormone receptors, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2. For metastatic breast cancer, the goal of treatments is to prolong survival and maintain quality of life. This review will present the current advances and controversies of surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, gene therapy, and other innovative treatment strategies in early-stage and metastatic breast cancer.

Is Axillary Staging Obsolete in Early Breast Cancer?

This article reviews the incidence of nodal metastases in early-stage breast cancer and the need for axillary staging to maintain local control in the axilla or to determine the need for adjuvant systemic therapy across the spectrum of patients with breast cancer, and reviews clinical trials addressing this question. At present, sentinel lymph node biopsy should be omitted in women age ≥70 years with cT1-2 N0, HR+/HER2- cancers. The importance of nodal status in selecting patients for radiotherapy remains the main reason for axillary staging in younger postmenopausal women with cT1-2N0, HR+/HER2- cancers.

Explaining risks and benefits of loco-regional treatments to patients

Treatment for early-stage breast cancer is complex, requiring multidisciplinary care with a multitude of treatment options available for each patient. Coupled with the rising importance of shared decision-making, patient-physician conversations are progressively more complicated. These conversations require frank disclosure of risks and benefits of the different treatment modalities in a way that is individualized for each patient and simple to understand. In most patients, breast conserving therapy with radiation should be presented as the gold-standard local treatment given similar long-term and improved quality of life outcomes. De-escalation is currently at the forefront of research in loco-regional treatments, and further investigations are required to best determine the optimal patient populations for reduced sentinel lymph node sampling, omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy altogether and omission of radiation treatment. For future trials, better endpoints need to be established considering patient-centered outcomes as well as recurrence.

Trends and variation in treatment of early breast cancer in European certified breast centres: an EUSOMA-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Practice indicators (PI) measure provided care making use of real-world data. This study describes trends and variations in adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer (EBC) using the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) database.

METHODS

The analysis was conducted on anonymous cumulative data registered by 56 certified breast centres, which all entered at least 500 new diagnoses in the database in the 10-year period 2010-2019. Practice trends of radiotherapy, endocrine treatment, chemotherapy, and anti-HER2 therapy were evaluated. The association with age group (<50, 50-69, ≥70) and geographical area of the centre (Northern, Central, Southern Europe; NE, CE, SE) was assessed with the Pearson Chi2 test for independence in contingency tables.

RESULTS

In total, 150,150 patients with EBC were selected. Overall, radiotherapy was administered more frequently in NE centres, and conversely, endocrine, chemo-, and anti-HER2 therapy were used more frequently in SE centres (p<0.001). 46.9% of the pN1 patients received postmastectomy radiotherapy, with significant differences by age and geographical region (p < 0.001). Adjuvant endocrine treatment for endocrine-sensitive carcinoma in situ was administered in 46.1%, with a decreasing trend during the study period (58.5-34.5%; p < 0.001). Anti-HER2 therapy was delivered in 75.6% of all patients with HER2BC T1a/bN0, patients older than 70 received anti-HER2 in 67.6% in SE compared to 31.3% in NE centres.

CONCLUSION

Important variations in EBC management between European certified breast centres have been demonstrated. PI using real-world data can help to monitor, evaluate, and eventually guide and align good clinical practice in the management of breast cancer.