Targeting Mutant BRAF in Relapsed or Refractory Hairy-Cell Leukemia

Detangling the Threads of Hairy Cell Leukemia, Beyond the Morphology and Into the Molecular

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) makes up 2% of leukemias in the United States and encompasses great molecular heterogeneity. The standard treatment paradigm involves purine nucleoside analogues in the upfront setting with high complete response rate to initial therapy but frequent relapses. There is an increasing role for BRAF inhibitors, with or without rituximab, in refractory and even in untreated patients. The response to purine analogues in HCL variant cases, otherwise classified as splenic lymphoma with prominent nucleolus in the 5th WHO edition classification, is less robust. Several antibodies, small molecular inhibitors, and combination regimens have been explored in HCL but data is frequently limited by case reports or small case series. Here we review available treatment options including their efficacy and safety profiles. We also explore investigational agents and potential future targets. The goal is to present a comprehensive therapeutic review of this rare disease entity and outline the ever increasing and novel therapeutic management options which interrupt key pathways in the pathogenesis of this malignancy.

Non-canonical BRAF variants and rearrangements in hairy cell leukemia

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is an uncommon mature B-cell malignancy characterized by a typical morphology, immunophenotype, and clinical profile. The vast majority of HCL patients harbor the canonical BRAF V600E mutation which has become a rationalized target of the subsequently deregulated RAS-RAF-MEK-MAPK signaling pathway in HCL patients who have relapsed or who are refractory to front-line therapy. However, several HCL patients with a classical phenotype display non-canonical BRAF mutations or rearrangements. These include sequence variants within alternative exons and an oncogenic fusion with the IGH gene. Care must be taken in the molecular diagnostic work-up of patients with typical HCL but without the BRAF V600E to include investigation of these uncommon mechanisms. Identification, functional characterization, and reporting of further such patients is likely to provide insights into the pathogenesis of HCL and enable rational selection of targeted inhibitors in such patients if required.

Recommendations for the Management of Patients with Hairy-Cell Leukemia and Hairy-Cell Leukemia-like Disorders: A Work by French-Speaking Experts and French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO) Group

INTRODUCTION

Hairy-cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorder (B-CLPD), whose favorable prognosis has changed with the use of purine nucleoside analogs (PNAs), such as cladribine (CDA) or pentostatin (P). However, some patients eventually relapse and over time HCL becomes resistant to chemotherapy. Many discoveries have been made in the pathophysiology of HCL during the last decade, especially in genomics, with the identification of the BRAFV600E mutation and cellular biology, including the importance of signaling pathways as well as tumor microenvironment. All of these new developments led to targeted treatments, especially BRAF inhibitors (BRAFis), MEK inhibitors (MEKis), Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors (BTKis) and recombinant anti-CD22 immunoconjugates.

RESULTS

The following major changes or additions were introduced in these updated guidelines: the clinical relevance of the changes in the classification of splenic B-cell lymphomas and leukemias; the increasingly important diagnostic role of BRAFV600E mutation; and the prognostic role of the immunoglobulin (IG) variable (V) heavy chain (H) (IGHV) mutational status and repertory. We also wish to insist on the specific involvement of bones, skin, brain and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of the disease at diagnosis or during the follow-up, the novel targeted drugs (BRAFi and MEKi) used for HCL treatment, and the increasing role of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment.

CONCLUSION

Here we present recommendations for the diagnosis of HCL, treatment in first line and in relapsed/refractory patients as well as for HCL-like disorders including HCL variant (HCL-V)/splenic B-cell lymphomas/leukemias with prominent nucleoli (SBLPN) and splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma (SDRPL).

Single agent vemurafenib or rituximab-vemurafenib combination for the treatment of relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia, a multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare mature B-cell malignancy that is primarily treated with purine analogues. However, relapse remains a significant challenge, prompting the search for alternative therapies. The BRAF V600E mutation prevalent in HCL patients provides a target for treatment with vemurafenib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included nine patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) HCL from six different centers. Patient data included demographics, prior treatments, clinical outcomes, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Patients received different treatment regimens between centers, including vemurafenib alone or in combination with rituximab. Despite the differences in protocols, all patients achieved at least a partial response, with seven patients achieving a complete response. Adverse events were generally mild with manageable side effects. The absence of myelotoxic effects and manageable side effects make BRAF inhibitors attractive, especially for patients ineligible for purine analogues or those with severe neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Single agent vemurafenib or in combination with rituximab appears to be a promising therapeutic option for R/R HCL. Further research is needed to establish standardized treatment protocols and to investigate long-term outcomes.

Hairy cell leukemia 2024: Update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and treatment-Annual updates in hematological malignancies

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and HCL-like disorders, including HCL variant (HCL-V) and splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma (SDRPL), are a very heterogenous group of mature lymphoid B-cell disorders characterized by the identification of hairy cells, a specific genetic profile, a different clinical course and the need for appropriate treatment.

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis of HCL is based on morphological evidence of hairy cells, an HCL immunologic score of 3 or 4 based on the CD11c, CD103, CD123, and CD25 expression, the trephine biopsy which makes it possible to specify the degree of tumoral bone marrow infiltration and the presence of BRAFV600E somatic mutation.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Progression of patients with HCL is based on a large splenomegaly, leukocytosis, a high number of hairy cells in the peripheral blood, and the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene mutational status. VH4-34 positive HCL cases are associated with a poor prognosis, as well as HCL with TP53 mutations and HCL-V.

TREATMENT

Patients should be treated only if HCL is symptomatic. Chemotherapy with risk-adapted therapy purine analogs (PNAs) are indicated in first-line HCL patients. The use of chemo-immunotherapy combining cladribine (CDA) and rituximab (R) represents an increasingly used therapeutic approach. Management of relapsed/refractory disease is based on the use of BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) plus R, MEK inhibitors (MEKi), recombinant immunoconjugates targeting CD22, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), and Bcl-2 inhibitors (Bcl-2i). However, the optimal sequence of the different treatments remains to be determined.

If it's a target, it's a pan-cancer target: Tissue is not the issue

Cancer is traditionally diagnosed and treated on the basis of its organ of origin (e.g., lung or colon cancer). However, organ-of-origin diagnostics does not reveal the underlying oncogenic drivers. Fortunately, molecular diagnostics have advanced at a breathtaking pace, and it is increasingly apparent that cancer is a disease of the genome. Hence, we now have multiple genomic biomarker-based, tissue-agnostic Food and Drug Administration approvals for both gene- and immune-targeted therapies (larotrectinib/entrectinib, for NTRK fusions; selpercatinib, RET fusions; dabrafenib plus trametinib, BRAFV600E mutations; pembrolizumab/dostarlimab, microsatellite instability; and pembrolizumab for high tumor mutational burden; pemigatinib is also approved for FGFR1-rearranged myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms). There are emerging targets as well, including but not limited to ALK, BRCA and/or homologous repair deficiency, ERBB2 (HER2), IDH1/2, KIT, KRASG12C, NRG1, and VHL. Many tissue-agnostic approvals center on rare/ultra-rare biomarkers (often < 1 % of cancers), necessitating screening hundreds of tumors to find a single one harboring the cognate molecular alteration. Approval has generally been based on small single-arm studies (<30-100 patients) with high response rates (>30 % to > 75 %) of remarkable durability. Because of biomarker rarity, single-gene testing is not practical; next generation sequencing of hundreds of genes must be performed to obtain timely answers. Resistance to biomarker-driven therapeutics is often due to secondary mutations or co-driver gene defects; studies are now addressing the need for customized drug combinations matched to the complex molecular alteration portfolio in each tumor. Future investigation should expand tissue-agnostic therapeutics to encompass both hematologic and solid malignancies and include biomarkers beyond those that are DNA-based.

An unusual form of BRAF-V600E mutated hairy cell neoplasm with clinical resistance to BRAF inhibition: Challenging precision medicine

Distinct outcomes of BRAF inhibition in BRAF-mutated hairy cell neoplasms with wild-type or mutant TP53, and alternative strategies to overcome mutant TP53.

Clinical analysis of hairy cell leukemia: the rare indolent hematological malignancy

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical features, diagnosis and treatment and prognosis of the rare hairy cell leukemia (HCL), in order to provide new references for the clinical and basic research of HCL.

METHODS

The clinical data of 17 patients with HCL admitted to Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Putian University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University from January 1, 2016 to July 1, 2023 were collected and retrospectively studied, and the clinical features, diagnosis and treatment effects and prognosis of patients with HCL were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Meanwhile, the latest literature from PubMed was retrieved to systematically discuss the research progress in the diagnosis and treatment of HCL.

RESULTS

In this study, there were 11 males and 6 females, the median age at diagnosis was 59.5 (30-81) years old, and the median time from the onset of clinical symptoms or signs to diagnosis was 4.5 (0.5-28.5) months. There were 9 cases (52.94%) with lymphoma B symptoms (fever, night sweating, and weight loss), 15 cases (88.24%) were accompanied by splenomegaly (3 cases of mild splenomegaly, 4 cases of moderate splenomegaly, and 8 cases of megasplenomegaly), the positive rate of BRAFV600E mutation is 76.47% (13/17). All patients in this study were treated, of which 11 were treated with Cladribine, 3 with Interferon, 2 with FC regimen, and 1 with R-CVP regimen + Cladribine. The median follow-up time was 39 (range, 2-83) months, 3 patients died, all due to failure of chemotherapy due to disease progression. The prognosis of HCL-v patients was significantly worse than that of cHCL patients (P=0.01), and there was no significant difference in the impact of different treatment regiments on the OS of HCL patients (P=0.328).

CONCLUSION

HCL is a rare clinically indolent hematological tumor, which is sensitive to Cladribine, with the emergence of precision treatments such as the novel molecular-targeted drugs and immunotherapy also plays an indispensable role in clinical practice of HCL.

Clinical analysis of hairy cell leukemia: the rare indolent hematological malignancy

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical features, diagnosis and treatment and prognosis of the rare hairy cell leukemia (HCL), in order to provide new references for the clinical and basic research of HCL.

METHODS

The clinical data of 17 patients with HCL admitted to Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Putian University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University from January 1, 2016 to July 1, 2023 were collected and retrospectively studied, and the clinical features, diagnosis and treatment effects and prognosis of patients with HCL were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Meanwhile, the latest literature from PubMed was retrieved to systematically discuss the research progress in the diagnosis and treatment of HCL.

RESULTS

In this study, there were 11 males and 6 females, the median age at diagnosis was 59.5 (30-81) years old, and the median time from the onset of clinical symptoms or signs to diagnosis was 4.5 (0.5-28.5) months. There were 9 cases (52.94%) with lymphoma B symptoms (fever, night sweating, and weight loss), 15 cases (88.24%) were accompanied by splenomegaly (3 cases of mild splenomegaly, 4 cases of moderate splenomegaly, and 8 cases of megasplenomegaly), the positive rate of BRAFV600E mutation is 76.47% (13/17). All patients in this study were treated, of which 11 were treated with Cladribine, 3 with Interferon, 2 with FC regimen, and 1 with R-CVP regimen + Cladribine. The median follow-up time was 39 (range, 2-83) months, 3 patients died, all due to failure of chemotherapy due to disease progression. The prognosis of HCL-v patients was significantly worse than that of cHCL patients (P=0.01), and there was no significant difference in the impact of different treatment regiments on the OS of HCL patients (P=0.328).

CONCLUSION

HCL is a rare clinically indolent hematological tumor, which is sensitive to Cladribine, with the emergence of precision treatments such as the novel molecular-targeted drugs and immunotherapy also plays an indispensable role in clinical practice of HCL.

Novel BRAF N581S mutation in mantle cell lymphoma

BRAF mutations are associated with a small number of hematologic malignancies, including hairy cell leukemia and histiocytic disorders. In addition, BRAF mutations have also been detected in low frequency in other B-cell lymphomas, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, but never in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We present a case of a 69-year-old female with classic MCL harboring a BRAFN581S mutation. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of any BRAF mutation in MCL.

Molecular Targeting of the BRAF Proto-Oncogene/Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Pathway across Cancers

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is essential for cellular proliferation, growth, and survival. Constitutive activation of this pathway by BRAF mutations can cause downstream activation of kinases, leading to uncontrolled cellular growth and carcinogenesis. Therefore, inhibition of BRAF and the downstream substrate MEK has been shown to be effective in controlling tumor growth and proliferation. Over the last decade, several BRAF and MEK inhibitors have been investigated, ranging from primarily melanoma to various cancer types with BRAF alterations. This subsequently led to several Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for BRAF/MEK inhibitors for melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, anaplastic thyroid cancer, colorectal cancer, histiocytosis neoplasms, and finally, tumor-agnostic indications. Here, this comprehensive review will cover the developments of BRAF and MEK inhibitors from melanomas to tumor-agnostic indications, novel drugs, challenges, future directions, and the importance of those drugs in personalized medicine.

Considering molecular alterations as pan-cancer tissue-agnostic targets

Owing to high response rates, the Food and Drug Administration has approved both gene- and immune-targeted drugs for tumor-agnostic, genomic biomarker-based indications, for lethal solid and blood cancers. We posit that current data support tissue-agnostic activity as a paradigm, rather than an exception to the rule.

The course of patients with hairy cell leukemia during the omicron surge of the Covid-19 pandemic

In this study, we aim to explore the outcomes of Covid-19 infection in patients with Hairy cell leukemia (HCL). The cohort is based on data obtained from electronic medical records. It includes 218 consecutive patients diagnosed with HCL between 16 June 1998, and 20 September 2022, out of which the coronavirus has infected 85 patients during the Omicron surge. Out of 85 patients with HCL who were infected by Covid-19; 7 patients (8.2%) have been hospitalized, and the mortality rate was 2.3% (two patients). Thirteen of the 85 patients had been infected by Covid-19 in previous waves, including 9/13 after vaccination, and none of them developed a severe disease. Humoral immune response after three doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination regimen was evaluated in 40 patients and was attained in 67.5%. Based on multivariate analysis: unfavorable outcome was significantly more common in patients with HCL above 65 years old, who had at least one cytopenia, and with comorbidity of cardiovascular disease or asplenia. Our results indicates that the course of COVID-19 in patients with HCL during the Omicron wave has been improved relatively favorable.

Long term follow-up of refractory/relapsed hairy cell leukaemia patients treated with low-dose vemurafenib between 2013 and 2022 at the Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University

Introduction: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is an indolent B-cell lymphoproliferative disease. BRAF V600E mutation is detected in nearly all classical HCL cases which offers the possibility of targeted therapy. Objective: The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of low-dose vemurafenib as well as to assess the long term outcome of HCL patients treated with this drug at the Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology at Semmelweis University. Methods: We report on 10 patients with classical HCL treated with low-dose vemurafenib at our Department between 2013 and 2022. Results: As a result of fixed time low-dose vemurafenib treatment, 5 of 10 patients (5/10) achieved partial remission, 4 (4/10) had stable disease, and 1 (1/10) had MRD positivity. No patients achieved complete remission. The median progression-free survival was 28.5 months while the overall survival was 82 months. Conclusion: We confirm that low dose of vemurafenib is effective and safe in the vast majority of patients with HCL. This small-molecule oral treatment allows to gain valuable time-months or even years-before further, usually parenteral treatment options have to be given or before previous treatment has to be repeated. There are also promising data supporting the combination of vemurafenib with other drugs for the treatment of HCL patients which could provide even further possibility to bridge treatment.

New Targeted Therapy Combination Holds Promise to Untangle Hairy Cell Leukemia

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is an uncommon B-cell neoplasm uniquely characterized by a high prevalence of the BRAFV600E mutation, which leads to constitutive activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway.1 In fact, the BRAFV600E point mutation is identified in nearly all cases of HCL; however, it is absent in HCL variant (vHCL) and rare in other B-cell neoplasms.2,3 Notably, in contrast to melanoma or other BRAF mutant solid tumors, HCL exhibits very few other mutations, potentially explaining the high response rates observed in patients treated with mutant BRAF-targeted agents, such as vemurafenib.

Vemurafenib and Obinutuzumab as Frontline Therapy for Hairy Cell Leukemia

BACKGROUND: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is characterized by the underlying genetic lesion of BRAFV600E and responsiveness to BRAF inhibitors. We assessed the safety and activity of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib combined with obinutuzumab in patients with previously untreated HCL. METHODS: We conducted a single-arm, multicenter clinical study of vemurafenib plus obinutuzumab. Vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily was administered for four cycles, and obinutuzumab was administered in cycles 2 to 4. The primary end point was complete remission (CR). Secondary end points included assessment of safety, minimal residual disease (MRD), and BRAF allele burden according to digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled in the study, and 27 patients completed all four cycles of treatments and achieved CR (90%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 73 to 98). Three patients discontinued the study early because of adverse events and were not evaluable for response. Of the 27 patients who achieved CR, 26 patients (96%; 95% CI, 81 to 99) achieved MRD negativity. BRAFV600E allele was undetectable by ddPCR in all 21 evaluable patients. At a median follow-up of 34.9 months (95% CI, 29.6 to 36.9), no patient experienced disease relapse. The most common vemurafenib-related adverse events were rash and arthralgia. Febrile neutropenia occurred in two patients, and blood or platelet transfusions were required in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Combined time-limited vemurafenib and obinutuzumab achieved CR in more than 90% of patients with previously untreated HCL. In this small study, acquired vemurafenib resistance or dose-limiting toxicity was not observed. Patients were not observed long enough to reveal secondary malignancies. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03410875.)

BRAF(V600E) mutation together with loss of Trp53 or pTEN drives the origination of hairy cell leukemia from B-lymphocytes

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a B-lymphoma induced by BRAF(V600E) mutation. However, introducing BRAF(V600E) in B-lymphocytes fails to induce hematological malignancy, suggesting that BRAF(V600E) needs concurrent mutations to drive HCL ontogeny. To resolve this issue, here we surveyed human HCL genomic sequencing data. Together with previous reports, we speculated that the tumor suppressor TP53, P27, or PTEN restrict the oncogenicity of BRAF(V600E) in B-lymphocytes, and therefore that their loss-of-function facilitates BRAF(V600E)-driven HCL ontogeny. Using genetically modified mouse models, we demonstrate that indeed BRAF(V600E)KI together with Trp53KO or pTENKO in B-lymphocytes induces chronic lymphoma with pathological features of human HCL. To further understand the cellular programs essential for HCL ontogeny, we profiled the gene expression of leukemic cells isolated from BRAF(V600E)KI and Trp53KO or pTENKO mice, and found that they had similar but different gene expression signatures that resemble that of M2 or M1 macrophages. In addition, we examined the expression signature of transcription factors/regulators required for germinal center reaction and memory B cell versus plasma cell differentiation in these leukemic cells and found that most transcription factors/regulators essential for these programs were severely inhibited, illustrating why hairy cells are arrested at a transitional stage between activated B cells and memory B cells. Together, our study has uncovered concurrent mutations required for HCL ontogeny, revealed the B cell origin of hairy cells and investigated the molecular basis underlying the unique pathological features of the disease, with important implications for HCL research and treatment.

Hairy Cell Leukemia: Where Are We in 2023?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article summarizes the current state of knowledge of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) regarding presentation, diagnosis, therapy, and monitoring, including perspectives on emergent therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past decade, there has been enormous progress in the understanding of the biology of HCL which has led to the development of novel therapeutic strategies. The maturation of data regarding existing management strategies has also lent considerable insight into therapeutic outcomes and prognosis of patients treated with chemo- or chemoimmunotherapy. Purine nucleoside analogs remain the cornerstone of treatment, and the addition of rituximab has deepened and prolonged responses in the upfront and relapsed setting. Targeted therapies now have a more defined role in the management of HCL, with BRAF inhibitors now having a potential in the first-line setting in selected cases as well as in relapse. Next-generation sequencing for the identification of targetable mutations, evaluation of measurable residual disease, and risk stratification continue to be areas of active investigation. Recent advances in HCL have led to more effective therapeutics in the upfront and relapsed setting. Future efforts will focus on identifying patients with high-risk disease who require intensified regimens. Multicenter collaborations are the key to improving overall survival and quality of life in this rare disease.

Beyond EGFR inhibitors in advanced colorectal cancer: Targeting BRAF and HER2

The addition of antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies, cetuximab or panitumumab, to conventional chemotherapy has improved clinical outcomes for rat sarcoma virus (RAS) wild-type advanced colorectal cancer patients, however, durable responses and 5-year overall survival rates remain limited. BRAF V600E somatic mutation and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) amplification/overexpression have been separately implicated in primary resistance to anti-EGFR therapeutic strategies via aberrant activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, resulting in poorer outcomes. In addition to being a negative predictive biomarker for anti-EGFR therapy, BRAF V600E mutation and HER2 amplification/overexpression serve as positive predictors of response to therapies targeting these respective tumor promoters. This review will highlight key clinical studies that support the rational use of v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) and HER2-targeted therapies, often in combination with other targeted agents, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. We discuss current challenges with BRAF and HER2-targeted therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer and potential opportunities for improvement.

Untangling the Strands of Hairy Cell Leukemia: The Clinicopathological Spectrum over Eleven Years at a Tertiary Care Center

BACKGROUND

Hairy Cell Leukemia (HCL) is an uncommon, indolent lymphoproliferative disorder of mature B lymphoid cells, accounting for 2% of all lymphoid tumors. The present study evaluated the clinical-hematological profile of HCL patients diagnosed at a single tertiary care center over a 11-year period.

METHODS

The retrospective observational study was done between October 2010 and September 2021. The relevant clinical and laboratory information were retrieved from hospital medical records and electronic databases. The statistical analysis was performed using version 23.0 of SPSS.

RESULTS

66 (5.9%) of 1125 cases of chronic lymphoproliferative disorder were HCL. Splenomegaly was found in 47 (71.2%), hepatomegaly in 26 (39.5%), and lymphadenopathy in 17 (25.7%) of the cases. The mean hemoglobin, total leukocytes count, and platelets count were 8.04 g/dl, 6.76 X 109/L, and 77 X 109/L, respectively. Pancytopenia was detected in 40 cases (60.61 %). Bone marrow biopsies were majorly hypercellular and showed predominantly diffuse infiltration by atypical lymphoid cells. In two patients, initially thought of having refractory/hypoplastic anemia, the bone marrow biopsy and flow cytometry revealed HCL involvement.  42 cases of HCL underwent flow cytometry. CD20, CD 11c, CD 25 and CD 103 were positive in all the cases. The aberrant expression of CD5, CD10, and CD23 was found in frequencies of 5.71 %, 31.42 %, and 19.35%, respectively. In 40 cases for which follow-up information was available, there was full remission in 26 patients (65%), and later three showed relapse (7.5%) of which one died, and persistent leukemic activity in five (10%).  Eight patients (20%) died even before the initiation of treatment. One patient died within one month of therapy. No patient was examined for BRAF V600E mutation analysis.

CONCLUSION

CD 10+ HCL was the most prevalent atypical immunophenotypic subgroup. Bone marrow biopsy and flow cytometry are crucial diagnostic tools to rule out hairy cell leukemia. However, BRAF V600E mutation analysis should be performed in cases with unusual presentation or resistance to treatment.

Top advances of the year: Precision oncology

The advent of precision medicine has changed the landscape of oncologic biomarkers, drug discovery, drug development, and, more importantly, outcomes for patients with cancer. Precision oncology entails the genomic profiling of tumors to detect actionable aberrations. The advances in clinical next-generation sequencing from both tumor tissue and liquid biopsy and availability of targeted therapies has rapidly entered mainstream clinical practice. In this review, recent major developments in precision oncology that have affected outcomes for patients with cancer are discussed. Rapid clinical development was seen of targeted agents across various mutational profiles such as KRASG12C (which was considered "undruggable" for almost 4 decades), Exon 20 insertions, and RET mutations. Approaches to precision chemotherapy delivery by the introduction of antibody drug conjugates in the armamentarium against lung cancer has been appreciated.

Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with relapsed/refractory BRAF V600E mutation-positive hairy cell leukemia

BRAF V600E is the key oncogenic driver mutation in hairy cell leukemia (HCL). We report the efficacy and safety of dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with relapsed/refractory BRAF V600E mutation-positive HCL. This open-label, phase 2 study enrolled patients with BRAF V600E mutation-positive HCL refractory to first-line treatment with a purine analog or relapsed after ≥2 prior lines of treatment. Patients received dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily plus trametinib 2 mg once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per criteria adapted from National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Consensus Resolution guidelines. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Fifty-five patients with BRAF V600E mutation-positive HCL were enrolled. The investigator-assessed ORR was 89.0% (95% confidence interval, 77.8%-95.9%); 65.5% of patients had a complete response (without minimal residual disease [MRD]: 9.1% [negative immunohistochemistry of bone marrow {BM} biopsy], 12.7% [negative BM aspirate flow cytometry {FC}], 16.4% [negative immunohistochemistry and/or FC results]; with MRD, 49.1%), and 23.6% had a partial response. The 24-month DOR was 97.7% with 24-month PFS and OS rates of 94.4% and 94.5%, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events were pyrexia (58.2%), chills (47.3%), and hyperglycemia (40.0%). Dabrafenib plus trametinib demonstrated durable responses with a manageable safety profile consistent with previous observations in other indications and should be considered as a rituximab-free therapeutic option for patients with relapsed/refractory BRAF V600E mutation-positive HCL. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02034110.

Case report: A case of classic hairy cell leukemia with CNS involvement treated with vemurafenib

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare mature B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder and most often presents as classic hairy cell leukemia. This entity is characterized by an indolent course and the presence of the BRAF V600E mutation. We report the case of an 80-year-old man with a history of classical hairy cell leukemia who presented with fatigue, dizziness, shortness of breath, blurring of vision, and headache. His initial diagnosis was 9 years prior, and he received treatments with cladribine, pentostatin, and rituximab. The workup showed an elevated white blood cell count with atypical lymphocytes, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. A peripheral blood smear confirmed HCL relapse, and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed diffuse, nonenhancing masses in the supratentorial and infratentorial regions of the brain. He was initiated on treatment with vemurafenib, with improvements in his white blood cell count and a recovery of his platelet count and hemoglobin. A repeat MRI of the brain after 3 months showed complete resolution of the lesions. Vemurafenib was discontinued after 6 months, with bone marrow biopsy showing no evidence of residual hairy cell leukemia. There have only been limited reports of HCL involvement in the central nervous system in the literature. Due to the rarity of the condition, it is not clear which treatments can be effective for intracranial disease control. Our report shows the successful use of vemurafenib, resulting in complete remission of relapsed HCL with CNS involvement.

BRAF inhibitor treatment of classical hairy cell leukemia allows successful vaccination against SARS-CoV-2

In classical hairy cell leukemia (HCL), standard treatments including purine analogs achieve a durable response (up to 90%), but lead to severe immunosuppression and long-lasting depletion of CD4 + T lymphocytes. The BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib is effective in HCL, but its use in first-line treatment is restricted to select clinical situations (e.g. active infection). Its impact on immune function or response to vaccines in HCL is unclear. We treated four HCL patients with vemurafenib during the COVID-19 pandemic and monitored immune reconstitution and response to SARS-CoV-2 immunization. All patients responded to HCL treatment with normalization of peripheral blood counts. No severe infections occurred. As an indication of limited immunosuppression by vemurafenib, stable CD4 + and CD8 + T lymphocyte counts and immunoglobulin levels were observed. Three out of four patients received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech) during treatment with vemurafenib. IgG antibody levels against the spike-protein of SARS-CoV-2 were detected (40-818 AE/ml). Our data suggest that vemurafenib has limited effects on cellular and humoral immune function in HCL, which allows for successful SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. These data support the use of BRAF inhibitors during the current pandemic where continued immune response is necessary for minimizing the COVID-19-related risk of non-vaccinated patients.

The coming decade in precision oncology: six riddles

High-throughput methods to investigate tumour omic landscapes have quickly catapulted cancer specialists into the precision oncology era. The singular lesson of precision oncology might be that, for it to be precise, treatment must be personalized, as each cancer's complex molecular and immune landscape differs from patient to patient. Transformative therapies include those that are targeted at the sequelae of molecular abnormalities or at immune mechanisms, and, increasingly, pathways previously thought to be undruggable have become druggable. Critical to applying precision medicine is the concept that the right combination of drugs must be chosen for each patient and used at the right stage of the disease. Multiple puzzles remain that complicate therapy choice, including evidence that deleterious mutations are common in normal tissues and non-malignant conditions. The host's role is also likely to be key in determining treatment response, especially for immunotherapy. Indeed, maximizing the impact of immunotherapy will require omic analyses to match the right immune-targeted drugs to the individualized patient and tumour setting. In this Perspective, we discuss six key riddles that must be solved to optimize the application of precision oncology to otherwise lethal malignancies.

BRAF and MEK Inhibitors and Their Toxicities: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis summarizes the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AE) of BRAFi and MEKi.

METHODS

A systematic search of Medline/PubMed was conducted to identify suitable articles published in English up to 31 December 2021. The primary outcomes were profiles for all-grade and grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs, and the analysis of single side effects belonging to both categories.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of treatment-related all-grade Aes was 99% for Encorafenib (95% CI: 0.97-1.00) and 97% for Trametinib (95% CI: 0.92-0.99; I² = 66%) and Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.94-0.99; I² = 0%). In combined therapies, the rate was 98% for both Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (95% CI: 0.96-0.99; I² = 77%) and Encorafenib + Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.96-1.00). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 69% of cases for Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.50-0.84; I² = 71%), 68% for Encorafenib (95% CI: 0.61-0.74), and 72% for Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (95% CI: 0.65-0.79; I² = 84%). The most common grade 1-2 AEs were pyrexia (43%) and fatigue (28%) for Dabrafenib + Trametinib and diarrhea for both Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (52%) and Encorafenib + Binimetinib (34%). The most common AEs of grade 3 or higher were pyrexia, rash, and hypertension for Dabrafenib + Trametinib (6%), rash and hypertension for Encorafenib + Binimetinib (6%), and increased AST and ALT for Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides comprehensive data on treatment-related adverse events of BRAFi and MEKi combination therapies, showing related toxicity profiles to offer a helpful tool for clinicians in the choice of therapy.

Long-term outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory hairy cell leukemia treated with vemurafenib monotherapy

Vemurafenib, an oral BRAF inhibitor, has demonstrated high response rates in relapsed/refractory (R/R) hairy cell leukemia (HCL). However, little is known about long-term outcomes and response to retreatment. Herein, we report the results of 36 patients with R/R HCL treated with vemurafenib from the United States arm of the phase 2 clinical trial (NCT01711632). The best overall response rate was 86%, including 33% complete response (CR) and 53% partial response (PR). After a median follow-up of 40 months, 21 of 31 responders (68%) experienced relapse with a median relapse-free survival (RFS) of 19 months (range, 12.5-53.9 months). There was no significant difference in the RFS for patients with CR vs PR. Fourteen of 21 (67%) relapsed patients were retreated with vemurafenib, with 86% achieving complete hematologic response. Two patients acquired resistance to vemurafenib with the emergence of new KRAS and CDKN2A mutations, respectively. Six of 12 (50%) responders to vemurafenib retreatment experienced another relapse with a median RFS of 12.7 months. Overall survival (OS) was 82% at 4 years, with a significantly shorter OS in patients who relapsed within 1 year of initial treatment with vemurafenib. Higher cumulative doses or a longer duration of treatment did not lengthen the durability of response. All adverse events in the retreatment cohort were grade 1/2 except for 1 case of a grade 3 rash and 1 grade 3 fever/pneumonia. Our data suggest that vemurafenib retreatment is a safe and effective option for patients with R/R HCL.

Novel targeted treatments in hairy cell leukemia and other hairy cell-like disorders

In the category of mature B-cell neoplasms, splenic B-cell lymphoma and leukemia were clearly identified and include four distinct entities: hairy cell leukemia (HCL), splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL), splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma (SDRPL) and the new entity named splenic B-cell lymphoma/leukemia with prominent nucleoli (SBLPN). The BRAF^V600E mutation is detected in nearly all HCL cases and offers a possibility of targeted therapy. BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) represent effective and promising therapeutic approaches in patients with relapsed/refractory HCL. Vemurafenib and dabrafenib were assessed in clinical trials. The BRAF^V600E mutation is missing in SDRPL and SBLPN: mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (MAP2K1) mutations were found in 40% of SBLPN and VH4-34+ HCL patients, making possible to use MEK inhibitors (MEKi) such as trametinib, cobimetinib or binimetinib in monotherapy or associated with BRAFi. Other mutations may be associated and other signaling pathways involved, including the B-cell receptor signaling (BCR), cell cycle, epigenetic regulation and/or chromatin remodeling. In SDRPL, cyclin D3 (CCND3) mutations were found in 24% of patients, offering the possibility of using cell cycle inhibitors. Even if new emerging drugs, particularly those involved in the epigenetic regulation, have recently been added to the therapeutic armamentarium in HCL and HCL-like disorders, purine nucleoside analogs more and more associated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, are still used in the frontline setting. Thanks to the recent discoveries in genetics and signaling pathways in HCL and HCL-like disorders, new targeted therapies have been developed, have proven their efficacy and safety in several clinical trials and become essential in real life: BRAFi, MEKi, Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKi) and anti-CD22 immunotoxins. New other drugs emerged and have to be assessed in the future. In this article, we will discuss the main mutations identified in HCL and HCL-like disorders and the signaling pathways potentially involved in the pathogenesis of the different hairy cell disorders. We will discuss the results of the recent clinical trials, which will help us to propose an algorithm useful in clinical practice and we will highlight the different new drugs that may be used in the near future.

Consensus opinion from an international group of experts on measurable residual disease in hairy cell leukemia

A significant body of literature has been generated related to the detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) at the time of achieving complete remission (CR) in patients with hairy cell leukemia (HCL). However, due to the indolent nature of the disease as well as reports suggesting long-term survival in patients treated with a single course of a nucleoside analog albeit without evidence of cure, the merits of detection of MRD and attempts to eradicate it have been debated. Studies utilizing novel strategies in the relapse setting have demonstrated the utility of achieving CR with undetectable MRD (uMRD) in prolonging the duration of remission. Several assays including immunohistochemical analysis of bone marrow specimens, multi-parameter flow cytometry and molecular assays to detect the mutant BRAF V600E gene or the consensus primer for the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene (IGH) rearrangement have been utilized with few comparative studies. Here we provide a consensus report on the available data, the potential merits of MRD assessment in the front-line and relapse settings and recommendations on future role of MRD assessment in HCL.

Long-term follow-up of cladribine treatment in hairy cell leukemia: 30-year experience in a multicentric Italian study

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare lymphoproliferative disease with an excellent prognosis after treatment with cladribine (2CDA), although relapse may occur during follow-up. The aim of the study is to review the efficacy, safety, long-term remission rate, and overall survival (OS) in those patients who received 2CDA as first-line treatment. We retrospectively reviewed data of HCL patients treated with 2CDA between March 1991 and May 2019 at 18 Italian Hematological centers: 513 patients were evaluable for study purpose. The median age was 54 years (range 24–88) and ECOG was 0 in 84.9% of cases. A total of 330 (64.3%) patients received 2CDA intravenously and 183 (35.7%) subcutaneously. ORR was 91.8%: CR was obtained in 335 patients (65.3%), PR in 96 (18.7%), and hematological response in 40 (7.8%) patients; in 42 (8.2%) no response was observed. Hemoglobin value (p = 0.044), frequency of circulating hairy cells (p = 0.039), recovery of absolute neutrophil count (p = 0.006), and normalization of spleen (p ≤ 0.001) were associated with CR compared to PR in univariable analysis. At a median follow-up of 6.83 years (range 0.04–28.52), the median time to relapse was 12.2 years. A significant difference in duration of response was identified between patients that obtained a CR and PR (19.4 years versus 4.8 years, p < 0.0001). Non-hematological grade 3 or higher early toxicity was reported in 103 (20.1%) patients. Median OS was not reached: 95.3%, 92.4%, and 81.8% of patients were estimated to be alive at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Forty-nine patients died (9.5%), following an infection in 14 cases (2.7%), natural causes in 14 (2.7%), cardiovascular events in 13 (2.5%), a second neoplasm in 6 (1.2%), and progression of HCL in 2 cases (0.4%). Following treatment of HCL with 2CDA, 80% of patients are estimated to be alive 15 years after diagnosis.

BRAF Rearrangements and BRAF V600E Mutations Are Seen in a Subset of Pancreatic Carcinomas With Acinar Differentiation

CONTEXT.—

Comprehensive genomic profiling has demonstrated that approximately 20% of pancreatic carcinomas with acinar differentiation harbor potentially targetable BRAF fusions that activate the MAPK pathway.

OBJECTIVES.—

To validate the above finding by BRAF break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in a large series of pure acinar cell carcinomas (ACCs), evaluate tumors for the presence of BRAF V600E mutations, and compare clinicopathologic features of tumors with BRAF rearrangements with those without.

DESIGN.—

Thirty cases of pure ACC and 6 cases of mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinoma (ACC-NEC) were retrieved. A break-apart FISH probe was used to detect BRAF rearrangements. Immunohistochemistry for BRAF V600E was performed.

RESULTS.—

BRAF rearrangements by FISH were found in 6 of 36 cases (17%), 5 of which were pure ACC and 1 was a mixed ACC-NEC. Follow-up was available in 29 of 36 cases (81%). The median survival was 22 months for BRAF-rearranged cases and 16 months for BRAF-intact cases; the 2-year overall survival was 50% for BRAF-rearranged cases and 35% for BRAF-intact cases. No significant clinicopathologic differences were identified in cases with BRAF rearrangement compared with those without BRAF rearrangement. BRAF V600E mutation was identified in 2 of 34 cases (6%), both of which were pure ACC and were BRAF-intact by FISH.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This study supports the finding that BRAF rearrangements are present in approximately 20% of cases and identified BRAF V600E mutations in approximately 5% of cases. These cases may benefit from targeted therapy.

La résistance aux inhibiteurs de BRAF

La voie de signalisation MAPK/ERK est une voie centrale de la signalisation intracellulaire. Sa dérégulation participe à la transformation et la progression tumorales. Dans plusieurs cancers, la découverte de mutations activatrices de BRAF, à l’origine de l’activation de cette voie, a ouvert de nouvelles perspectives thérapeutiques avec le développement d’inhibiteurs spécifiques de la protéine. Selon les cancers, ces inhibiteurs ont cependant montré soit une efficacité insuffisante, due à la résistance primaire des cellules tumorales, soit une efficacité transitoire, due à l’apparition d’une résistance acquise. Dans cette revue, nous revenons sur les découvertes qui ont conduit au développement de ces inhibiteurs de BRAF. Nous détaillons également les mécanismes moléculaires et cellulaires de la résistance à ces inhibiteurs observée dans différents types de cancers. Comprendre ces mécanismes est en effet primordial pour développer des stratégies thérapeutiques qui soient plus efficaces.

Tissue-Agnostic Activity of BRAF plus MEK Inhibitor in BRAF V600-Mutant Tumors

BRAF plus MEK inhibitor combinations are currently FDA-approved for melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and anaplastic thyroid cancer. The lack of clinical benefit with BRAF inhibition in BRAF V600-mutated colorectal cancer has prevented its tissue-agnostic drug development. We reviewed the AACR GENIE database for the prevalence of BRAF V600 mutations across tumor types. We reviewed the literature for case reports of clinical responses, outcomes in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive nonmelanoma malignancies who received BRAF inhibitor therapy, and data from published adult and pediatric trials. BRAF V600 mutations are prevalent across multiple nonmelanoma malignancies (>40 different tumor types), lead to oncogene addiction, and are clinically actionable in a broad range of adult and pediatric nonmelanoma rare malignancies. Continued tissue-agnostic drug development is warranted beyond the current BRAF plus MEK approved cancers.

How I treat refractory/relapsed hairy cell leukemia with BRAF inhibitors

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) responds very well to frontline chemotherapy with purine analogs (cladribine and pentostatine). However, approximately half of patients experience 1 or more relapses, which become progressively resistant to these myelotoxic and immunosuppressive agents. At progression, standard therapeutic options include a second course of purine analogs alone or in combination with rituximab and, upon second relapse, therapy with the anti-CD22 immunotoxin moxetumomab pasudotox. Furthermore, blockade of the mutant BRAF-V600E kinase (the pathogenetic hallmark of HCL) through orally available specific inhibitors (vemurafenib or dabrafenib) effaces the peculiar morphologic, phenotypic, and molecular identity of this disease and its typical antiapoptotic behavior and is emerging as an attractive chemotherapy-free strategy in various clinical scenarios. These include patients with, or at risk of, severe infections and, in a highly effective combination with rituximab, patients with relapsed or refractory HCL. Other treatments explored in clinical trials are BTK inhibition with ibrutinib and co-inhibition of BRAF (through dabrafenib or vemurafenib) and its downstream target MEK (through trametinib or cobimetinib). Here, we focus on our experience with BRAF inhibitors in clinical trials and as off-label use in routine practice by presenting 3 challenging clinical cases to illustrate their management in the context of all available treatment options.

Updates in hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and variant-type HCL (HCL-V): rationale for targeted treatments with a focus on ibrutinib

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and HCL-like disorders such as hairy cell leukemia variant (HCL-V) and splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma (SDRPL) are rare indolent B-cell malignancies. Purine analogs (PNAs), alone or in association with rituximab (R), are the standard of care for HCL in the first-line setting. However, PNAs are toxic and patients may become resistant to these drugs. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies are needed. Several recent in vitro studies highlighted the importance of the interactions between HCL cells and their microenvironment, in particular with bone marrow stromal cells, endothelial cells, and the extracellular matrix. In these interactions, chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules play a major role. Moreover, the importance of signaling pathways, like BRAF, BCR, and CXCR4 has been underlined. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a fundamental signal transmitter of BCR and CXCR4 in HCL. Preclinical and recent clinical data showed an efficacy of ibrutinib, a BTK inhibitor (BTKi), in HCL and HCL-V. These promising results joined those of other emerging drugs like BRAF or MEK inhibitors and anti-CD22 immunotoxins.

Plain Language Summary

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors (BTKi) in hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and variant-type HCL The treatment of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) has changed significantly in recent years. In the first-line settings, treatment with purine analogs (PNAs) with or without anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies remains the gold standard in 2022. In relapsed/refractory HCL, other drugs are needed: BRAF inhibitors: vemurafenib monotherapy with or without rituximab or dabrafenib in combination with trametinib, an MEK inhibitor (MEKi), as well as the anti-CD22 antibody drug conjugate moxetumomab pasudotox.There are arguments for the use of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi). Ibrutinib was recently tested in a multisite phase 2 study in 37 patients with either HCL (28 patients: 76%) or HCL-V (nine patients: 24%) including two who were previously untreated. Patients received single-agent ibrutinib at 420 mg daily (24 patients) or 840 mg daily (13 patients) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The overall response rate (ORR) at 32 weeks was 24%, increasing to 36% at 48 weeks and reaching 54% at any time since starting ibrutinib. Seven patients achieved a complete response (CR) as the best response at any time on study, while 13 patients had a partial response (PR) and 10 patients had stable disease (SD). Interestingly, the response rate was not statistically different between HCL and HCL-V patients, suggesting that ibrutinib could be an option in both entities. The estimated 36-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 73% and the estimated 36-month overall survival (OS) was 85%, with no differences between HCL and HCL-V. The frequency of cardiovascular grade 1-2 adverse events (AEs) was 16% for atrial fibrillation; 3% for atrial flutter; 32% for hypertension; and 0%, 3%, and 11%, respectively, for grade ⩾ 3 AEs. Unlike in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), where the mechanism of action of ibrutinib is well known, the mechanism of action of ibrutinib in HCL appears to be unclear. No mutations were identified in patients with progressive disease, suggesting that the mechanisms of resistance could be different between HCL and CLL. The BTKi that are not yet approved are challenged by the new other targeted treatments.