1
|
Schmitt F, Najjari L, Kupec T, Stickeler E, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Wittenborn J. Predictors of significant distress in cervical cancer patients: a cross sectional study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024; 310:551-560. [PMID: 38652310 PMCID: PMC11169000 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07505-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This cross-sectional study aims to investigate parameters that predict relevant levels of distress in women in a perioperative setting undergoing treatment for cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from 495 patients with cervical cancer that were treated at the university hospital Aachen between 2010 and 2022 were analysed based on their respective National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer score (DT) and Problem List (PL) and their clinical history. 105 patients were enrolled in the study. 18 medical and demographic variables were analysed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS Three variables contributed significantly to the prediction of a DT score ≥ 5. Significant distress was defined as a DT score of ≥ 5, which was observed in 70.5% of the participants (mean: 5.58 ± 2.892). Women who chose to receive psycho-oncological counselling were more likely to have a DT score ≥ 5 (Odds Ratio(OR) = 3.323; Confidence Interval (CI95%): 1.241-8.900; p-value: 0.017). In addition, women who did not receive chemoradiation had significantly higher DT scores (OR = 3.807; CI 95%:1.185-12.236; p-value: 0.025), as did women whose Distress Thermometer was assessed in the first month after their initial diagnosis (OR = 3.967; CI 95%:1.167-13.486; p-value: 0.027). CONCLUSION Increased distress in women with cervical cancer is common especially in the first month after diagnosis, in patients who do not receive chemoradiation and in patients who seek psycho-oncological counselling. Surgical factors do not play a major role in patient distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friederike Schmitt
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Laila Najjari
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Tomas Kupec
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Gießen, Justus Liebig University, Klinikstraße 33, 35392, Gießen, Germany
| | - Julia Wittenborn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Van Damme A, Tummers P, De Visschere P, Van Dorpe J, Van de Vijver K, Vercauteren T, De Gersem W, Denys H, Naert E, Makar A, De Neve W, Vandecasteele K. Exclusion of non-Involved uterus from the target volume (EXIT-trial): An individualized treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer using modern radiotherapy and imaging techniques followed by completion surgery. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 47:100793. [PMID: 38798749 PMCID: PMC11126536 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). In this study, we postulate that omitting an iconographical unaffected uterus (+12 mm distance from the tumour) from the treatment volume is safe and that no tumour will be found in the non-targeted uterus (NTU) leading to reduction of high-dose volumes of surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Material and Methods In this single-arm phase 2 study, two sets of target volumes were delineated: one standard-volume (whole uterus) and an EXIT-volume (exclusion of non-tumour-bearing parts of the uterus with a minimum 12 mm margin from the tumour). All patients underwent chemoradiotherapy targeting the EXIT-volume, followed by completion hysterectomy. In 15 patients, a plan comparison between two treatment plans (PTV vs PTV_EXIT) was performed. The primary endpoint was the pathological absence of tumour involvement in the non-targeted uterus (NTU). Secondary endpoints included dosimetric impact of target volume reduction on OARs, acute and chronic toxicity, overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results In all 21 (FIGO stage I: 2; II: 14;III: 3; IV: 2) patients the NTU was pathologically negative. Ssignificant reductions in Dmean in bladder, sigmoid and rectum; V15Gy in sigmoid and rectum, V30Gy in bladder, sigmoid and rectum; V40Gy and V45Gy in bladder, bowel bag, sigmoid and rectum; V50Gy in rectum were achieved. Median follow-up was 54 months (range 7-79 months). Acute toxicity was mainly grade 2 and 5 % grade 3 urinary. The 3y- OS, PFS and LRFS were respectively 76,2%, 64,9% and 81 %. Conclusion MRI-based exclusion of the non-tumour-bearing parts of the uterus at a minimum distance of 12 mm from the tumour out of the target volume in LACC can be done without risk of residual disease in the NTU, leading to a significant reduction of the volume of surrounding OARS treated to high doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Van Damme
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philippe Tummers
- Department of Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pieter De Visschere
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Departement of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Jo Van Dorpe
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen Van de Vijver
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tom Vercauteren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Werner De Gersem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Department of Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, ZNA Middelheim Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Eline Naert
- Department of Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, ZNA Middelheim Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Amin Makar
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wilfried De Neve
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Katrien Vandecasteele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lambaudie E, Bogart E, Le Deley MC, El Hajj H, Gauthier T, Hebert T, Collinet P, Classe JM, Lecuru F, Motton S, Conri V, Ferrer C, Marchal F, Ferron G, Probst A, Jauffret C, Narducci F. The Influence of Surgical Complexity and Center Experience on Postoperative Morbidity After Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: Lessons Learned from the ROBOGYN-1004 Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4566-4575. [PMID: 38616209 PMCID: PMC11164758 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15265-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was a secondary analysis of the ROBOGYN-1004 trial conducted between 2010 and 2015. The study aimed to identify factors that affect postoperative morbidity after either robot-assisted laparoscopy (RL) or conventional laparoscopy (CL) in gynecologic oncology. METHODS The study used two-level logistic regression analyses to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of patient, surgery, and center characteristics in predicting severe postoperative morbidity 6 months after surgery. RESULTS This analysis included 368 patients. Severe morbidity occurred in 49 (28 %) of 176 patients who underwent RL versus 41 (21 %) of 192 patients who underwent CL (p = 0.15). In the multivariate analysis, after adjustment for the treatment group (RL vs CL), the risk of severe morbidity increased significantly for patients who had poorer performance status, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.62 for the 1-point difference in the WHO performance score (95 % CI 1.06-2.47; p = 0.027) and according to the type of surgery (p < 0.001). A focus on complex surgical acts showed significant more morbidity in the RL group than in the CL group at the less experienced centers (OR, 3.31; 95 % CI 1.0-11; p = 0.05) compared with no impact at the experienced centers (OR, 0.87; 95 % CI 0.38-1.99; p = 0.75). CONCLUSION The findings suggest that the center's experience may have an impact on the risk of morbidity for patients undergoing complex robot-assisted surgical procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marie-Cécile Le Deley
- Oscar Lambret Cancer Center, Lille, France
- Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Houssein El Hajj
- Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
- Oscar Lambret Cancer Center, Lille, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Frederic Marchal
- CRAN, UMR 7039, CNRS Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine Vandoeuvre les-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Gwenael Ferron
- Institut Claudius Regaud Cancer Center-Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Agusti N, Viveros-Carreño D, Melamed A, Pareja R, Kanbergs A, Wu CF, Nitecki R, Colbert L, Rauh-Hain JA. Adjuvant external beam radiotherapy combined with brachytherapy for intermediate-risk cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024:ijgc-2024-005570. [PMID: 38925662 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with intermediate-risk cervical cancer receive external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) as adjuvant treatment. It is commonly administered with brachytherapy without proven benefits. Therefore, we evaluated the frequency of brachytherapy use, the doses for EBRT administered alone or with brachytherapy, and the overall survival impact of brachytherapy in patients with intermediate-risk, early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was performed using data collected from the National Cancer Database. Patients diagnosed with cervical cancer from 2004 to 2019 who underwent a radical hysterectomy and lymph node staging and had disease limited to the cervix but with tumors larger than 4 cm or ranging from 2 to 4 cm with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) were included. Patients with distant metastasis or parametrial involvement were excluded. Patients who underwent EBRT alone were compared with those who also received brachytherapy after 2:1 propensity score matching. RESULTS In total, 1174 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 26.7% of them received brachytherapy. After 2:1 propensity score matching, we included 620 patients in the EBRT group and 312 in the combination treatment group. Patients who received brachytherapy had higher equivalent doses than those only receiving EBRT. Overall survival did not differ between the two groups (hazard ratio (HR) 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62 to 1.23]; p=0.45). After stratification according to tumor histology, LVSI, and surgical approach, brachytherapy was not associated with improved overall survival. However, in patients who did not receive concomitant chemotherapy, the overall survival rate for those receiving EBRT and brachytherapy was significantly higher than that for those receiving EBRT alone (HR, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.86]; p=0.011). CONCLUSION About one-fourth of the study patients received brachytherapy and EBRT. The variability in the doses and radiotherapy techniques used highlights treatment heterogeneity. Overall survival did not differ for EBRT with and without brachytherapy. However, overall survival was longer for patients who received brachytherapy but did not receive concomitant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuria Agusti
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David Viveros-Carreño
- Unidad Ginecología Oncológica, Grupo de Investigación GIGA, Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo - CTIC, Bogota, Colombia
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Clínica Universitaria Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rene Pareja
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Alexa Kanbergs
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chi-Fang Wu
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Roni Nitecki
- Gynecologic Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren Colbert
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bercow A, Del Carmen MG, Rauh-Hain JA, Melamed A. Role of Minimally Invasive Techniques in the Management of Early-Stage Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2400656. [PMID: 38917386 DOI: 10.1200/jco.24.00656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Bercow
- Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meigs Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Marcela G Del Carmen
- Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meigs Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Alexander Melamed
- Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meigs Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guo XM, Roman LD, Matsuo K. Considerations for route of hysterectomy in low-risk cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024:ijgc-2024-005745. [PMID: 38909992 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- X Mona Guo
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Koji Matsuo
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yu H, He H, Liang X, Lin H, Sun D, Fan J. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: The more experienced the bedside assistant, the better? Heliyon 2024; 10:e31741. [PMID: 38841439 PMCID: PMC11152684 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Aim to investigate the impact of bedside assistant's work experience and learning curve on the short-term safety and efficacy in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Methods Our research retrospectively retrieved 120 cases of early-stage cervical cancer patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. According to the different work experiences of the two bedside assistants (BA), patients were divided into a research group (inexperienced BA 1) and a control group (experienced BA 2). Furthermore, the learning curves of these BAs were plotted separately and divided into two distinct phases by cumulative summation: the first learning phase and the second master phase. Result In terms of work experience, comparing BA 1 with BA 2 who was more experienced, although the average operative time was prolonged by 29 min (P<0.001), it did not increase the incidence of operative complication [24.4 % VS 29.1 %, P = 0.583], positive resection margin [4.9 % VS 7.6 %, P = 0.714], intraoperative organ damage [0 % VS 2.5 %, P = 0.546] and there was no significant difference in the number of lymph nodes [19 VS 15, P = 0.103]. Additionally, comparing two distinct phases of the same bedside assistant, there was no significant increasing rate in terms of operative complication, positive resection margin, intraoperative organ damage, and the number of lymph nodes (P>0.05) neither BA 1 nor BA 2, except for a slight extension of operative time about 20 min in learning phase (P<0.05). Conclusion In robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer, work inexperience and the learning phase of BA only result in a slight extension of operative time, without causing worse short-term surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hang Yu
- Department of Gynecology, Guangxi Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
- Department of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Haijing He
- Department of Gynecology, Guangxi Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Xuzhi Liang
- Department of Gynecology, Guangxi Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Huisi Lin
- Department of Gynecology, Guangxi Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Dan Sun
- Department of Gynecology, Guangxi Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Jiangtao Fan
- Department of Gynecology, Guangxi Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pergialiotis V, Rodolakis I, Rodolakis A, Thomakos N. Controversies and Advances in the Personalized Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer. J Pers Med 2024; 14:606. [PMID: 38929827 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14060606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer represents a global health issue as it is mostly encountered in women of reproductive age, while at the same time, survival outcomes seem to have remained constant during the last two decades. The need to implement fertility-sparing strategies as well as to decrease the morbidity that accompanies radical treatment has been extensively studied. During the last decade, several randomized clinical trials have been released, resulting in significant advances in the surgical treatment of early-stage disease. At the same time, evidence about the surgical treatment of advanced-stage disease as well as recurrent disease has gradually appeared and seems to be promising, thus leading the point forward towards personalized medicine that will remove the surgical barriers that seem concrete in our era. Nevertheless, the discrepancies in perioperative morbidity and survival outcomes that were observed among published studies raise several questions. In the present article, we chose to review the gray fields in the surgical treatment of early-stage and advanced-stage cervical cancer. Studies that are based on strong evidence that support current clinical practice are compared to smaller cohorts that present novel data that may form the basis for future research, and issues that remain poorly explored are discussed in an effort to help establish a consensus for future research development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilios Pergialiotis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15703 Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Rodolakis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15703 Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15703 Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15703 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Uwins C, Assalaarachchi H, Bennett K, Read J, Tailor A, Crawshaw J, Chatterjee J, Ellis P, Skene SS, Michael A, Butler-Manuel S. MIRRORS: a prospective cohort study assessing the feasibility of robotic interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:886-897. [PMID: 38561194 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish the feasibility and safety of robotic interval debulking surgery following the MIRRORS protocol (robot-assisted laparoscopic assessment prior to robotic or open surgery) in women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. MIRRORS is the first of three planned trials: MIRRORS, MIRRORS-RCT (pilot), and MIRRORS-RCT. METHODS The participants were patients with stage IIIc-IVb epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, suitable for interval debulking surgery with a pelvic mass ≤8 cm. The intervention was robot-assisted laparoscopic assessment prior to robotic or open interval debulking surgery (MIRRORS protocol). The primary outcome was feasibility of recruitment, and the secondary outcomes were quality of life (EORTC QLQC30/OV28, HADS questionnaires), pain, surgical complications, complete cytoreduction rate (%), conversion to open surgery (%), and overall and progression-free survival at 1 year. RESULTS Overall, 95.8% (23/24) of patients who were eligible were recruited. Median age was 68 years (range 53-83). All patients had high grade serous histology and were BRCA negative. In total, 56.5% were stage IV, 43.5% were stage III, 87.0% had a partial response, while 13.0% had stable disease by RECIST 1.1. Median peritoneal cancer index was 24 (range 6-38). Following MIRRORS protocol, 87.0% (20/23) underwent robotic interval debulking surgery, and 13.0% (3/23) had open surgery. All patients achieved R<1 (robotic R0=47.4%, open R0=0%). No patients had conversion to open. Median estimated blood loss was 50 mL for robotic (range 20-500 mL), 2026 mL for open (range 2000-2800 mL) (p=0.001). Median intensive care length of stay was 0 days for robotic (range 0-8) and 3 days (range 3-13) for MIRRORS Open (p=0.012). The median length of stay was 1.5 days for robotic (range 1-17), 6 days for open (range 5-41) (p=0.012). The time to chemotherapy was as follows 18.5 days for robotic (range 13-28), 25 days for open (range 22-28) (p=0.139). CONCLUSIONS Robotic interval debulking surgery appears safe and feasible for experienced robotic surgeons in patients with a pelvic mass ≤8 cm. A randomized controlled trial (MIRRORS-RCT) will determine whether MIRRORS protocol has non-inferior survival (overall and progression-free) compared with open interval debulking surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Uwins
- Academic Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
- School of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Hasanthi Assalaarachchi
- Academic Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Kate Bennett
- Surrey Clinical Trials Unit, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - James Read
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Anil Tailor
- Academic Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - James Crawshaw
- Department or Radiology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Jayanta Chatterjee
- Academic Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Patricia Ellis
- Academic Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Simon S Skene
- Surrey Clinical Trials Unit, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Agnieszka Michael
- School of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Surrey Clinical Trials Unit, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK
- St Luke's Cancer Centre, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Simon Butler-Manuel
- Academic Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Davidson SJ, El-Rayes D, Khalifa M, Fok CS, Erickson BK. HPV-independent cervical cancer associated with non-reducible pelvic organ prolapse: A case report. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2024; 53:101408. [PMID: 38774769 PMCID: PMC11107248 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
•The presence of concomitant non-reducible prolapse and cervical cancer is rare.•Treatment of cervical cancer complicated by non-reducible prolapse must be individualized.•The role prolapse may play in the development of HPV-negative cervical cancer is unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J Davidson
- University of Minnesota, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women’s Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Dina El-Rayes
- University of Minnesota, Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Mahmoud Khalifa
- University of Minnesota, Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Cynthia S Fok
- University of Minnesota, Department of Urology, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Britt K Erickson
- University of Minnesota, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sulaiman M, Ali KA, Chunguang Y, Hashim R, Luan Y, Xiong ZZ, Huang H, Wang Z. Open versus robot-assisted retroperitoneal tumors resection involving inferior vena cava, abdominal aorta, and renal hilum: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:3288-3295. [PMID: 38658391 PMCID: PMC11133115 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10848-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgery is currently the only effective treatment for retroperitoneal tumors that do not involve any specific organ. The use of robots for removing both benign and malignant retroperitoneal tumors is considered safe and feasible. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether robotic retroperitoneal tumor resection (RMBRs) is superior to open retroperitoneal malignant resection (OMBRs). This study compares the short-term outcomes of robotic excision of benign and malignant retroperitoneal tumors with open excision of the same-sized tumors. METHODS The study compared demographics and outcomes of patients who underwent robotic resection (n = 54) vs open resection (n = 54) of retroperitoneal tumors between March 2018 and December 2022. A 1:1 matching analysis was conducted to ensure a fair comparison. RESULTS The study found that RBMRs resulted in reduced operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBM), and postoperative hospital stay (PSH) when compared to OBMRs. Additionally, RBMRs reduced EBL, PHS, and OT for patients with malignant tumor involvement in major vessels. No significant differences were found in tumor size, blood transfusion rate, and morbidity rate between the RBMRs and OBMRs groups. CONCLUSION When comparing RMBRs to OMBRs, it was observed that RMBR was associated with lower (EBL), shorter postoperative hospital stays (PHS), and reduced operative time (OT) in a specific group of patients with both benign and malignant tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manan Sulaiman
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Khan Akhtar Ali
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Yang Chunguang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Rubina Hashim
- Department of Trauma, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Institute of Trauma, Karachi, 74000, Pakistan
| | - Yang Luan
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Ze Zhong Xiong
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Hui Huang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Zhihua Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Somasegar S, Anastasio MK, Karam A, Rossi EC, Obermair A. Controversies in the Surgical Management of Gynecologic Cancer: Balancing the Decision to Operate or Hesitate. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e438550. [PMID: 38815208 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_438550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
Cancer outcomes are largely measured in terms of disease-free survival or overall survival, which is highly dependent on timely diagnosis and access to treatment methods available within the country's existing health care system. Although cancer survival rates have markedly led in the past few decades, any improvement in the 5-year survival of gynecologic cancers has been modest, as in the case of ovarian and cervical cancers, or has declined, as in the case of endometrial cancer. The lack of effective screening options contributes to many women presenting with advanced-stage disease and the need for radical approaches to treatment. Although treatment for early-stage disease can lead to a cure, advanced-stage disease is fraught with a high potential for morbidity and mortality, and recent clinical trials have aimed to assess the noninferiority of minimally invasive options versus aggressive surgical approaches. Of particular interest is fertility-sparing treatments for endometrial and cervical cancers, which have recently been on the rise among younger women. Balancing morbidity with the risk of mortality, and loss of fertility and quality of life requires a targeted patient-centered approach to treatment. This is an ongoing area of intense research and sometimes may challenge current treatment paradigms. In this two-part review, we present an overview of current approaches to gynecologic cancer treatment and the need to de-escalate radical surgical approaches and preserve fertility. We also review the intricacies of ovarian and advanced endometrial cancer treatment, exploring the nuances in surgical debulking timing and its impact on outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahana Somasegar
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Mary Katherine Anastasio
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Amer Karam
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Emma C Rossi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Andreas Obermair
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Loverro M, Bizzarri N, Capomacchia FM, Watrowski R, Querleu D, Gioè A, Naldini A, Santullo F, Foschi N, Fagotti A, Scambia G, Fanfani F. Indocyanine green fluorescence applied to gynecologic oncology: beyond sentinel lymph node. Int J Surg 2024; 110:3641-3653. [PMID: 38489558 PMCID: PMC11175818 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Indocyanine green (ICG), a well-known molecule employed in medicine for over five decades, has emerged as a versatile dye widely embraced across various surgical disciplines. In gynecologic oncology, its prevalent use revolves around the detection of sentinel lymph nodes. However, the true potential of ICG extends beyond this singular application, owing to its pragmatic utility, cost-effectiveness, and safety profile. Furthermore, ICG has been introduced in the theranostic landscape, marking a significant juncture in the evolution of its clinical utility. This narrative review aims to describe the expanding horizons of ICG fluorescence in gynecologic oncology, beyond the sentinel lymph node biopsy. The manifold applications reported within this manuscript include: 1) lymphography; 2) angiography; 3) nerve visualization; 4) ICG-driven resections; and 5) theranostic. The extensive exploration across these numerous applications, some of which are still in the preclinical phase, serves as a hypothesis generator, aiming to stimulate the development of clinical studies capable of expanding the use of this drug in our field, enhancing the care of gynecological cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Loverro
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS
| | - Nicolò Bizzarri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS
| | | | - Rafał Watrowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obsterics, Helios Hospital Müllheim, Teaching Hospital of the University of Freiburg, 79379 Müllheim
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Denis Querleu
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS
| | - Alessandro Gioè
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS
| | - Angelica Naldini
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS
| | - Francesco Santullo
- Operational Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli
| | - Nazario Foschi
- Urology Division, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wang R, Ma L, Xiao Y, Jiang H, Zhu J, Xia H. A case of postoperative non-invasive mucosal implantation of early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma to the clitoris. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2024; 165:1295-1297. [PMID: 38282450 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
SynopsisPostoperative non‐invasive mucosal implantation of cervical adenocarcinoma on the clitoris is rare. Surgical resection is appropriate for local recurrence in the vulva.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rongmin Wang
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lingwei Ma
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yinping Xiao
- Department of Pathology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongyuan Jiang
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Disease, Shanghai, China
| | - Jin Zhu
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Disease, Shanghai, China
| | - Hexia Xia
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Disease, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nica A, Benseler A, Parbhakar A, Fortin LAT, Heyns M, Lee M, Covens A, Plante M, May T. Robotic versus vaginal radical trachelectomy for reproductive-aged patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma: A multi-center cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 185:95-100. [PMID: 38377763 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A randomized non-inferiority trial showed worse survival in women with early-stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy by minimally invasive approach compared to laparotomy; the impact of surgical approach on survival following radical trachelectomy is unknown. OBJECTIVE To examine oncologic outcomes in women with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent robotic or vaginal radical trachelectomy at Canadian cancer centers with the highest volumes of radical trachelectomy procedures. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective multi-centre cohort analysis which includes patients who had surgery between 2006 and 2019. Women with International FIGO 2009 stage IA-IB cervical cancer who underwent radical trachelectomy and lymph node assessment were grouped by surgical approach (vaginal versus robotic surgery). RESULTS A total of 197 patients were included from 4 regional referral centres. 56 women underwent robotic radical trachelectomy and 141 underwent vaginal radical trachelectomy. All patients had lymph node assessment by a minimally invasive technique. Median age was 32 years, median tumor size was 12 mm, and median depth of invasion was 5 mm. Recurrence-free survival was 97% in both groups at a median follow-up of 57 months. On multivariable analysis, after adjusting for previously chosen confounders (high risk pathologic criteria, tumor size, and LVSI) there was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the 2 groups (HR 2.1, 95%CI 0.3-7.1, p = 0.5). Tumor size larger than 2 cm (HR 9.4, 95%CI 2.8-26, p = 0.003) was the only variable predictive of recurrence. CONCLUSION Survival outcomes were excellent in both cohorts of patients undergoing robotic vs. vaginal radical trachelectomy. The surgical approach was not significantly associated with risk of recurrence after adjusting for clinically important confounders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andra Nica
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Anouk Benseler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ashna Parbhakar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ly-Ann Teo Fortin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Marguerite Heyns
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Marette Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Al Covens
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marie Plante
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Taymaa May
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nistor SI, El Tawab S, Zouridis A, Ferrari F, Soleymani Majd H. Minimally invasive surgery in the management of early stage cervical cancer after the publication of SHAPE trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024:ijgc-2024-005724. [PMID: 38821544 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Ioana Nistor
- Gynaecology Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Sally El Tawab
- Gynaecology Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, El-Shatby Children's Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Andreas Zouridis
- Gynaecology Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Federico Ferrari
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Hooman Soleymani Majd
- Gynaecology Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ramirez PT, Robledo KP, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Ribeiro R, Lopez A, Yan X, Isla D, Moretti R, Bernardini MQ, Gebski V, Asher R, Behan V, Coleman RL, Obermair A. LACC Trial: Final Analysis on Overall Survival Comparing Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2302335. [PMID: 38810208 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The aim of this study was to compare overall survival between open and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with participants followed for 4.5 years. The primary objective was to evaluate whether minimally invasive surgery was noninferior in disease-free survival (DFS) to abdominal radical hysterectomy. Secondary outcomes included overall survival. Sample size was based on DFS of 90% at 4.5 years and 7.2% noninferiority margin for minimally invasive surgery. A total of 631 patients were enrolled: 319 assigned to minimally invasive and 312 to open surgery. Of these, 289 (90.6%) patients underwent minimally invasive surgery and 274 (87.8%) patients open surgery. At 4.5 years, DFS was 85.0% in the minimally invasive group and 96% in the open group (difference of -11.1; 95% CI, -15.8 to -6.3; P = .95 for noninferiority). Minimally invasive surgery was associated with lower rate of DFS compared with open surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 3.91 [95% CI, 2.02 to 7.58]; P < .001). Rate of overall survival at 4.5 years was 90.6% versus 96.2% for the minimally invasive and open surgery groups, respectively (HR for death of any cause = 2.71 [95% CI, 1.32 to 5.59]; P = .007). Given higher recurrence rate and worse overall survival with minimally invasive surgery, an open approach should be standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston, Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Kristy P Robledo
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Frumovitz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rene Pareja
- Clínica de Oncología Astorga, Medellín, Colombia
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Reitan Ribeiro
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Aldo Lopez
- Departament of Gynecologic Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru
| | - Xiaojian Yan
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - David Isla
- Department of Oncological Gynecology, National Institute of Cancerology, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Renato Moretti
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paolo, Brazil
| | - Marcus Q Bernardini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Val Gebski
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca Asher
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Vanessa Behan
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Andreas Obermair
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nasioudis D, Labban N, Gysler S, Ko EM, Giuntoli RL, Kim SH, Latif NA. Outcomes of Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Carcinoma, with or without Prior Cervical Excision Procedure. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2051. [PMID: 38893170 PMCID: PMC11171021 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of a prior cervical excisional procedure on the oncologic outcomes of patients with apparent early-stage cervical carcinoma undergoing radical hysterectomy. METHODS The National Cancer Database (2004-2015) was accessed, and patients with FIGO 2009 stage IB1 cervical cancer who had a radical hysterectomy with at least 10 lymph nodes (LNs) removed and a known surgical approach were identified. Patients who did and did not undergo a prior cervical excisional procedure (within 3 months of hysterectomy) were selected for further analysis. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated following the generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control a priori-selected confounders. RESULTS A total of 3159 patients were identified; 37.1% (n = 1171) had a prior excisional procedure. These patients had lower rates of lymphovascular invasion (29.2% vs. 34.9%, p = 0.014), positive LNs (6.7% vs. 12.7%, p < 0.001), and a tumor size >2 cm (25.7% vs. 56%, p < 0.001). Following stratification by tumor size, the performance of an excisional procedure prior to radical hysterectomy was associated with better OS even after controlling for confounders (aHR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.30, 0.66). The rate of minimally invasive surgery was higher among patients who had a prior excisional procedure (61.5% vs. 53.2%, p < 0.001). For these patients, performance of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was not associated with worse OS (aHR: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.66, 2.82). CONCLUSIONS For patients undergoing radical hysterectomy, preoperative cervical excision may be associated with a survival benefit. For patients who had a prior excisional procedure, minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was not associated with worse overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Nasioudis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Han S, Na J, Li Y, Wang J. Surgical procedures and techniques in robot-assisted uterine artery-preserving radical trachelectomy. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:222. [PMID: 38795189 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01982-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/27/2024]
Abstract
The aim of the study was to study robotic cervical radical trachelectomy, aimed at standardizing and optimizing surgical procedures, thereby facilitating the learning process. All surgical procedures were based on the anatomy of the embryonic compartments, which not only help prevent tumor spillage due to disruption of the embryonic compartments, but also maximize the avoidance of inadequate resection margins. Using robotics to perform radical trachelectomy, combined with the concept of membrane anatomy, not only enables a bloodless surgical process, but also streamlines and simplifies the procedure, making it more efficient and precise. Utilizing robotics for radical hysterectomy can lead to a more meticulous and refined outcome. Precise surgical techniques contribute to standardizing and optimizing surgical procedures, thereby facilitating the learning process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shichao Han
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 467 Zhongshan Road, Shahekou District, Dalian, Liaoning province, China.
| | - Jing Na
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 467 Zhongshan Road, Shahekou District, Dalian, Liaoning province, China
| | - Ya Li
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 467 Zhongshan Road, Shahekou District, Dalian, Liaoning province, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 467 Zhongshan Road, Shahekou District, Dalian, Liaoning province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Persson J, Lührs O, Geppert B, Ekdahl L, Lönnerfors C. A prospective study evaluating an optimized sentinel node algorithm in early stage cervical cancer: The PROSACC-study. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 187:178-183. [PMID: 38788515 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2024] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A single center prospective non-randomized study to assess a systematically developed anatomically-based sentinel lymph node (SLN) algorithm in cervical cancer. METHODS Consecutive women with FIGO 2009 stage 1A2-2A1 cervical cancer undergoing robotic radical hysterectomy/trachelectomy between September 2014 and January 2023 had cervically injected Indocyanine Green (ICG) as a tracer for detection of pelvic SLN. An anatomically based surgical algorithm was adhered to; defining SLNs as the juxtauterine mapped nodes within the upper and lower paracervical lymphatic pathways including separate removal of the parauterine lymphovascular tissue (PULT). A completion pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed. Ultrastaging and immunohistochemistry was performed on SLNs, including the PULT. RESULTS 181 women were included for analysis. Median histologic tumor size was 14.0 mm (range 2-80 mm). The bilateral mapping rate was 98.3%. As per protocol an interim analysis rejected H0 and inclusion stopped at 29 node positive women, all identified by at least one metastatic ICG-defined SLN. One woman awaiting histology at study-closure was node positive and included in the analysis. Sensitivity was 100% (95% CI, 88.4%-100%) and NPV 100% (95% CI, 97.6%-100%). In node positive women, the proximal obturator position harbored 46.1% of all SLN metastases representing the only position in 40% and 10% had isolated metastases in the PULT. CONCLUSIONS Strictly adhering to an anatomically based SLN-algorithm including identification of parallell lymphatics within major pathways, partilularly the obturator compartment, assessment of the PULT, restricting nodal dissection to the removal of SLNs accurately identifies pelvic nodal metastatic disease in early-stage cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Persson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 22185 Lund, Sweden.
| | - Oscar Lührs
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 22185 Lund, Sweden
| | - Barbara Geppert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 22185 Lund, Sweden
| | - Linnea Ekdahl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 22185 Lund, Sweden
| | - Celine Lönnerfors
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 22185 Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fichtinger RS, Aldrighetti LA, Abu Hilal M, Troisi RI, Sutcliffe RP, Besselink MG, Aroori S, Menon KV, Edwin B, D'Hondt M, Lucidi V, Ulmer TF, Díaz-Nieto R, Soonawalla Z, White S, Sergeant G, Olij B, Ratti F, Kuemmerli C, Scuderi V, Berrevoet F, Vanlander A, Marudanayagam R, Tanis P, Dewulf MJ, Dejong CH, Eminton Z, Kimman ML, Brandts L, Neumann UP, Fretland ÅA, Pugh SA, van Breukelen GJ, Primrose JN, van Dam RM. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hemihepatectomy: The ORANGE II PLUS Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1799-1809. [PMID: 38640453 PMCID: PMC11107897 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare outcomes after laparoscopic versus open major liver resection (hemihepatectomy) mainly for primary or metastatic cancer. The primary outcome measure was time to functional recovery. Secondary outcomes included morbidity, quality of life (QoL), and for those with cancer, resection margin status and time to adjuvant systemic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a multicenter, randomized controlled, patient-blinded, superiority trial on adult patients undergoing hemihepatectomy. Patients were recruited from 16 hospitals in Europe between November 2013 and December 2018. RESULTS Of the 352 randomly assigned patients, 332 patients (94.3%) underwent surgery (laparoscopic, n = 166 and open, n = 166) and comprised the analysis population. The median time to functional recovery was 4 days (IQR, 3-5; range, 1-30) for laparoscopic hemihepatectomy versus 5 days (IQR, 4-6; range, 1-33) for open hemihepatectomy (difference, -17.5% [96% CI, -25.6 to -8.4]; P < .001). There was no difference in major complications (laparoscopic 24/166 [14.5%] v open 28/166 [16.9%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.84; P = .58). Regarding QoL, both global health status (difference, 3.2 points; P < .001) and body image (difference, 0.9 points; P < .001) scored significantly higher in the laparoscopic group. For the 281 (84.6%) patients with cancer, R0 resection margin status was similar (laparoscopic 106 [77.9%] v open 122 patients [84.1%], OR, 0.60; P = .14) with a shorter time to adjuvant systemic therapy in the laparoscopic group (46.5 days v 62.8 days, hazard ratio, 2.20; P = .009). CONCLUSION Among patients undergoing hemihepatectomy, the laparoscopic approach resulted in a shorter time to functional recovery compared with open surgery. In addition, it was associated with a better QoL, and in patients with cancer, a shorter time to adjuvant systemic therapy with no adverse impact on cancer outcomes observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S. Fichtinger
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Roberto I. Troisi
- Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Transplantation Service, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Robert P. Sutcliffe
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Somaiah Aroori
- Department of Surgery, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Krishna V. Menon
- Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Intervention Center and Department of Hepatic, Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Valerio Lucidi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tom F. Ulmer
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Rafael Díaz-Nieto
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Zahir Soonawalla
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Steve White
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Gregory Sergeant
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Bram Olij
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Christoph Kuemmerli
- Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Vincenzo Scuderi
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Frederik Berrevoet
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Aude Vanlander
- Department of Surgery, Free University Hospital, AZ Jette Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Pieter Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maxime J.L. Dewulf
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis H.C. Dejong
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Deceased
| | - Zina Eminton
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Merel L. Kimman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lloyd Brandts
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ulf P. Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Åsmund A. Fretland
- Intervention Center and Department of Hepatic, Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Siân A. Pugh
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Gerard J.P. van Breukelen
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - John N. Primrose
- Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Ronald M. van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wolf J, Wu Y, Hayek J, Zhang Q, Alagkiozidis I. Trends in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Management in the US: A National Cancer Database Analysis. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:2836-2845. [PMID: 38785496 PMCID: PMC11119135 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31050215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 05/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial was published in 2018 and demonstrated that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) yields inferior survival outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer compared to open surgery. This study investigates how the results of the LACC trial have impacted the selection of the primary treatment modality and adjuvant radiation utilization in early-stage cervical cancer. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we compared patients with stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer before (1/2016-12/2017) and after (1/2019-12/2020) the LACC trial. A total of 7930 patients were included: 4609 before and 3321 after the LACC trial. There was a decline in MIS usage from 67% pre-LACC to 35% thereafter (p < 0.001). In both the pre- and post-LACC periods, patients undergoing radical MIS more frequently had small volume disease (pre-LACC tumors ≤ 2 cm, 48% MIS vs. 41% open, p = 0.023; post-LACC stage IA2, 22% vs. 15%, p = 0.002). Pre-LACC, MIS radical hysterectomy was associated with White race (82% vs. 77%, p = 0.001) and private insurance (63% vs. 54%, p = 0.004), while there was no difference in socioeconomic factors in the post-LACC period. Although the proportion of patients treated with primary chemoradiation remained stable, the post-LACC cohort had a younger median age (52.47 vs. 56.37, p = 0.005) and more microscopic disease cases (13% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.002). There was no difference in the rate of radiation after radical hysterectomy before and after the trial (26% vs. 24%, p = 0.3). Conclusions: Post-LACC, patients were less likely to undergo MIS but received adjuvant radiation at similar rates, and primary chemoradiation patients were younger and more likely to have microscopic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Wolf
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA
| | - Yiyuan Wu
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Judy Hayek
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA
| | - Qi Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11219, USA
| | - Ioannis Alagkiozidis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11219, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dai Z, Qin F, Yang Y, Liang W, Wang X. Efficacy and safety of robotic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1303165. [PMID: 38812787 PMCID: PMC11134290 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1303165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) is a newly developed minimally invasive surgery that has been suggested as a substitute for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH). This meta-analysis aims to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (RRH) for cervical cancer. Materials and methods A systematic search was conducted in four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL) for studies comparing the utilization of RRH and LRH in the treatment of cervical cancer. The search included articles published from the inception of the databases up until July 18, 2023. Meta-analyses were conducted to assess several surgical outcomes, including operation time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, pelvic lymph nodes, positive surgical margin, total complications, one-year recurrence rate, one-year mortality, and one-year disease-free survival rate. Results Six studies were included for meta-analysis. In total, 234 patients were in the RRH group and 174 patients were in the LRH group. RRH had significantly longer operative time (MD=14.23,95% CI:5.27~23.20, P=0.002),shorter hospital stay (MD= -1.10,95% CI:-1.43~0.76, P <0.00001),more dissected pelvic lymph nodes(MD=0.89,95%CI:0.18~1.60, P =0.01) and less blood loss(WMD = -27.78,95%CI:-58.69 ~ -3.14, P=0.08, I2 = 80%) compared with LRH. No significant difference was observed between two groups regarding positive surgical margin (OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.18~2.76, P=0.61), over complications (OR = 0.77, 95% CI, 0.46-1.28, P=0.31), one-year recurrence rate (OR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.03-1.15, P=0.13), one-year mortality rate (OR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.03-1.15, P=0.07) and disease-free survival at one year (OR = 1.92, 95% CI 0.32-11.50, P=0.48). Conclusion RRH is an increasingly popular surgical method known for its high level of security and efficiency. It has many benefits in comparison to LRH, such as decreased blood loss, a higher quantity of dissected pelvic lymph nodes, and a shorter duration of hospitalization. Further multicenter, randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up durations are necessary to conclusively determine the safety and efficacy of RRH, as no significant differences were observed in terms of positive surgical margin, postoperative complications, 1-year recurrence, 1-year mortality, and 1-year disease-free survival. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023446653.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Xiao Wang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Naumann RW. The SHAPE trial: is good is good enough? J Gynecol Oncol 2024; 35:35.e107. [PMID: 38789397 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2024] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- R Wendel Naumann
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Levine Cancer, Atrium Health, Wake Forest University, Charlotte, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Shuai X, Xiao D, Han B, Du Y. Type and approach of hysterectomy and oncological survival of women with stage II cancer of endometrium: a large retrospective cohort study. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1404831. [PMID: 38803540 PMCID: PMC11128539 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1404831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To explore the association between the Type and approach of hysterectomy and oncological survival of women with stage II cancer of the endometrium. Patients and methods 684 women with stage II endometrial cancer were included. Eligible cases were grouped by type of hysterectomy (simple hysterectomy or radical hysterectomy)and approach of hysterectomy (laparoscopy or laparotomy). The baseline characteristics were compared among groups. The survival outcomes (disease-free survival and overall survival) were calculated and compared among groups, and the underlying confounding factors were adjusted by the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Results The radical hysterectomy group and the simple hysterectomy group had 217 cases and 467 cases, respectively. Between the groups, the difference in 5-year disease-free survival (87.3% versus 87.9%, HR=0.97, P=0.87) and 5-year overall survival (83.8% versus 83.8%, HR=0.95, P=0.95) was not statistically significant. The laparotomy group and the laparoscopy group had 277 cases and 407 cases, respectively. Between the groups, the difference in 5-year disease-free survival (88.7% versus 87.1%, HR=1.22, P=0.34) and 5-year overall survival (85.5% versus 82.7%, HR=1.00, P=0.99) was not statistically significant. Conclusion For long-term oncological survival, radical hysterectomy is not superior to total hysterectomy in stage II endometrial cancer. Also, for stage II cancer of the endometrium, laparoscopic hysterectomy is as oncologically safe as open hysterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu Shuai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Fifth People’s Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Affiliated Fifth People's Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Chengdu, China
- Geriatric Disease Institute of Chengdu, Cancer Prevention and Treatment institute of Chengdu, Chengdu, China
| | - Dan Xiao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Fifth People’s Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Affiliated Fifth People's Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Chengdu, China
- Geriatric Disease Institute of Chengdu, Cancer Prevention and Treatment institute of Chengdu, Chengdu, China
| | - Binhua Han
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yixue Du
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Di Donato V, Bogani G, Laganà AS, Giannini A. Editorial: Early cervical cancer: laparotomic vs minimally invasive surgery and fertility-sparing possible strategies. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1415558. [PMID: 38765252 PMCID: PMC11099829 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1415558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Violante Di Donato
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Paolo Giaccone” Hospital, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrea Giannini
- Unit of Gynecology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yang S, Ding Y, Li H, Wu S, Feng W, Wang Y, Wang X, Hua K. Impact of peritoneal vaginoplasty combined with radical hysterectomy on the quality of sexual life for patients with early-stage cervical cancer: trial protocol for a multi-center superiority randomized controlled trial. J Gynecol Oncol 2024; 35:e23. [PMID: 38037548 PMCID: PMC11107286 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical hysterectomy (RH) is commonly used to treat early-stage cervical cancer in women of childbearing age and sexual dysfunction due to postoperative vaginal shortening is a major concern. The impact of intraoperative vaginoplasty on prognosis and quality of sexual life in patients with early-stage cervical cancer remains controversial and lacks high-level evidence. However, there are few reports on vaginoplasty after RH to lengthen vagina in patients. This prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial aims to explore the impact of peritoneal vaginoplasty with or without ovarian transposition after laparoscopic RH on sexual dysfunction in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS Eligible patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive peritoneal vaginoplasty or not. The primary evaluation indicators are female sexual function index (FSFI) and male sexual satisfaction scale. The secondary evaluation indicators include EORTC QLQ-CX24, 2-year overall survival (OS), 5-year OS, 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), 5-year PFS and surgery-related complications. The trial will enroll 368 patients from 6 hospitals in China over a 3-year period and follow up for 5 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000040610.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shimin Yang
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Ding
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Huaifang Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sufang Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiwei Feng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yudong Wang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The International Peace Maternity & Child Health Hospital (IPMCH) of China Welfare Institute (CWI), Shanghai, China
| | - Xipeng Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Keqin Hua
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chikazawa K, Muro S, Yamaguchi K, Imai K, Kuwata T, Konno R, Akita K. Denonvilliers' fascia as a potential nerve-course marker for the female urinary bladder. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 184:1-7. [PMID: 38271772 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study investigated the relationship between Denonvilliers' fascia (DF) and the pelvic plexus branches in women and explored the possibility of using the DF as a positional marker in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (RH). METHODS This study included eight female cadavers. The DF, its lateral border, and the pelvic autonomic nerves running lateral to the DF were dissected and examined. The pelvis was cut into two along the mid-sagittal line. The uterine artery, deep uterine veins, vesical veins, and nerve branches to the pelvic organs were carefully dissected. RESULTS The nerves ran sagitally, while the DF ran perpendicularly to them. The rectovaginal ligament was continuous with the DF, forming a single structure. The DF attached perpendicularly and seamlessly to the pelvic plexus. The pelvic plexus branches were classified into a ventral part branching to the bladder, uterus, and upper vagina and a dorsal part branching to the lower vagina and rectum as well as into four courses. Nerves were attached to the rectovaginal ligament and ran on its surface to the bladder ventral to the DF. The uterine branches split from the common trunk of these nerves. The most dorsal branch to the bladder primarily had a common trunk with the uterine branch, which is the most important and should be preserved in nerve-sparing Okabayashi RH. CONCLUSION The DF can be used as a marker for nerve course, particularly in one of the bladder branches running directly superior to the DF, which can be preserved in nerve-sparing Okabayashi RH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenro Chikazawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama 330-8503, Japan; Department of Clinical Anatomy, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo City, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
| | - Satoru Muro
- Department of Clinical Anatomy, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo City, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
| | - Kumiko Yamaguchi
- Department of Clinical Anatomy, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo City, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
| | - Ken Imai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama 330-8503, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Kuwata
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
| | - Ryo Konno
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama 330-8503, Japan
| | - Keiichi Akita
- Department of Clinical Anatomy, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo City, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Knigin D, Brezinov Y, Salvador S, Lau S, Gotlieb WH. Surgery Advances in Gynecologic Tumors: The Evolution and Outcomes of Robotic Surgery for Gynecologic Cancers in a Tertiary Center. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:2400-2409. [PMID: 38785460 PMCID: PMC11120242 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31050179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The integration of innovation into routine clinical practice is faced with many challenges. In 2007, we received the mandate to evaluate how the introduction of a robotic program in gynecologic oncology affected patient-centered care by studying its impact on clinical outcomes and hospital resource utilization. Here we summarize the history and experience of developing a robotic surgery program for gynecologic cancers over 16 years. Analysis of the data indicates that robotic surgery improved perioperative patient clinical parameters, decreased blood loss, complications, and hospital stay, maintained the oncologic outcome, and is cost-effective, resulting in it becoming the dominant surgical approach in gynecologic oncology in a tertiary cancer care institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Knigin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada; (D.K.); (S.S.); (S.L.)
- Segal Cancer Center, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Yoav Brezinov
- Segal Cancer Center, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada; (D.K.); (S.S.); (S.L.)
- Segal Cancer Center, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada; (D.K.); (S.S.); (S.L.)
- Segal Cancer Center, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Walter H. Gotlieb
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada; (D.K.); (S.S.); (S.L.)
- Segal Cancer Center, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Baekelandt J. vNOTES Radical Hysterectomy: A New Approach to Cervical Cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024:S1553-4650(24)00173-0. [PMID: 38642886 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To demonstrate how a radical hysterectomy with sentinel node resection for cervical cancer can be performed via vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES). DESIGN Demonstration of the technique in 10 steps. making use of narrated original video footage SETTING: The surgical treatment of cervical cancer is traditionally performed via one of the following techniques: Wertheim radical hysterectomy via laparotomy, Schauta radical hysterectomy vaginally, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy or robotic radical hysterectomy. The results of the LACC trial showed that minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was associated with lower rates of disease-free survival and overall survival than open radical hysterectomy among women with early-stage cervical Cancer [1]. For endometrial cancer, a vNOTES retroperitoneal approach to sentinel node resection was first published in 2019 [2]. Based on the experience with this approach and with Schauta-Stoeckel radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer [3], a new approach was developed to perform a radical hysterectomy via vNOTES whereby most of the procedure is performed retroperitoneally [4]. This video article demonstrates in 10 steps how a radical hysterectomy via vNOTES is performed. INTERVENTIONS Radical hysterectomy via vNOTES demonstrated making use of original video footage of a 57-year-old woman operated on for cervical adenocarcinoma 7 weeks after a LEEP cone. The steps of the procedure are: 1. Vaginal cuff creation, 2. Development of lateral retroperitoneal space and sentinel node resection, 3. Uterine artery and vein transection, 4. Hypogastric nerve dissection, 5. Development of central retroperitoneal space and rectum dissection, 6. Posterior colpotomy, 7. Parametrium dissection, 8. Bladder pillar dissection, 9. Anterior colpotomy, 10. Salpingo-oophorectomy or salpingectomy. 3 Patients were so far treated by this new technique that allowed for good hemostatic control. CONCLUSION vNOTES enables a potentially less invasive approach to radical hysterectomy performed largely retroperitoneally and completely transvaginally, leaving no visible scars. The endoscopic approach offers excellent visualization of the retroperitoneal and parametrial anatomy. This is a new approach that requires further validation and should only be performed in a research setting, taking into account the current reservations about endoscopic surgery for cervical cancer resulting from the LACC trial. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Baekelandt
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Imelda Hospital and Department of Development and Regeneration, University of Leuven (Dr. Baekelandt), Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bebia V, Díaz-Feijoo B, Tejerizo Á, Torne A, Benito V, Hernández A, Gorostidi M, Domingo S, Bradbury M, Luna-Guibourg R, Gil-Moreno A. Patterns of First Recurrence and Oncological Outcomes in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients: Does Surgical Staging Play a Role? Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1423. [PMID: 38611101 PMCID: PMC11011205 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to determine whether surgical aortic staging by minimally invasive paraaortic lymphadenectomy (PALND) affects the pattern of first recurrence and survival in treated locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) patients when compared to patients staged by imaging (noPALND). METHODS This study was a multicenter observational retrospective cohort study of patients with LACC treated at tertiary care hospitals throughout Spain. The inclusion criteria were histological diagnosis of squamous carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, and/or adenocarcinoma; FIGO stages IB2, IIA2-IVA (FIGO 2009); and planned treatment with primary chemoradiotherapy between 2000 and 2016. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed before the analysis. RESULTS After PSM and sample replacement, 1092 patients were included for analysis (noPALND n = 546, PALND n = 546). Twenty-one percent of patients recurred during follow-up, with the PALND group having almost double the recurrences of the noPALND group (noPALND: 15.0%, PALND: 28.0%, p < 0.001). Nodal (regional) recurrences were more frequently observed in PALND patients (noPALND:2.4%, PALND: 11.2%, p < 0.001). Among those who recurred regionally, 57.1% recurred at the pelvic nodes, 37.1% recurred at the aortic nodes, and 5.7% recurred simultaneously at both the pelvic and aortic nodes. Patients who underwent a staging PALND were more frequently diagnosed with a distant recurrence (noPALND: 7.0%, PALND: 15.6%, p < 0.001). PALND patients presented poorer overall, cancer-specific, and disease-free survival when compared to patients in the noPALND group. CONCLUSION After treatment, surgically staged patients with LACC recurred more frequently and showed worse survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicente Bebia
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain (M.B.); (A.G.-M.)
| | - Berta Díaz-Feijoo
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain (M.B.); (A.G.-M.)
- Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Álvaro Tejerizo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Aureli Torne
- Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Virginia Benito
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular-Materno Infantil, 35016 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Alicia Hernández
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Mikel Gorostidi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario Donostia, 20014 San Sebastián, Spain;
| | - Santiago Domingo
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Melissa Bradbury
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain (M.B.); (A.G.-M.)
| | - Rocío Luna-Guibourg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08041 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain (M.B.); (A.G.-M.)
- CIBERONC Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer, 08193 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wess B, Kohler C, Plaikner A, El-Safadi S, Schwandner T, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Favero G. Comparative study using indocyanine green and patent blue dye for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024:ijgc-2023-005206. [PMID: 38485222 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymphatic involvement is the most important prognostic factor in early-stage cervical cancer. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a viable alternative to systematic lymphadenectomy and may identify metastases more precisely. OBJECTIVE To compare two tracers (indocyanine green and patent blue) to detect sentinel nodes. METHODS A single-center, retrospective study of women treated due to early-stage cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 IA1 with lymphovascular invasion, IA2, and IB1). Location and tracer of all detected sentinel nodes had been documented for a prospective, multicenter trial (SENTIX trial). All sentinel nodes were sent to frozen section and final analysis through ultrastaging using a standard protocol. RESULTS Overall, 103 patients were included. Bilateral detection rate for indocyanine green (93.2%) was significantly higher than for blue dye (77.7%; p=0.004). Their combined use significantly increased the bilateral detection to 99.0% (p=0.031). While 97.4% of all sentinel nodes were located below the common iliac vessels, no para-aortic nodes were labeled. Simultaneous bilateral detection with both tracers was found in 71.8% of the cases, of which the sentinel nodes were identical in 91.9%. Nine positive nodes were detected among seven patients (6.8%), all marked with indocyanine green while patent blue labeled six. Frozen section failed to detect one of three macrometastases and three of four micrometastases (sensitivity 43%; negative prediction value 96%). CONCLUSION Anatomical distribution and topographic localization of the sentinel nodes obtained with these tracers were not different. Indocyanine green provided a significantly higher bilateral detection rate and had superior sensitivity to detect positive nodes compared with patent blue. Combining indocyanine green and blue dye increased the bilateral detection rate significantly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Wess
- University Hospitals Giessen and Marburg Campus Giessen, Giessen, Hessen, Germany
| | - Christhardt Kohler
- Department of Gynecology, University of Cologne, Koln, Germany
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg-Altona, Asklepios Hospital Group, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Plaikner
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg-Altona, Asklepios Hospital Group, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Giovanni Favero
- University Hospitals Giessen and Marburg Campus Giessen, Giessen, Hessen, Germany
- Asklepios Hospital Lich, Lich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zhang J, Zhou Y, Ye H, Chen C, Luo Y. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal hysterectomy on wound complications in patients with early stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J 2024; 21:e14529. [PMID: 38069545 PMCID: PMC10961037 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (LARVH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) have been widely applied to treat cervical carcinoma. But LARVH and ARH have not been fully investigated in treating cervical carcinoma after injury associated with injury. This research is intended to provide an up-to-date basis for comparing LARVH with ARH in early stage cervical carcinoma. Comparison between LARVH and ARH in cervical carcinoma was carried out through a combination of related research. Eligible articles from databases such as PubMed and Embase were screened using an established search strategy. This report covered the results of LARVH versus ARH in cervical carcinoma. The average difference and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for the combination of consecutive variables. The combination of categorical variables was performed with the odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval. Through the identification of 1137 publications, eight of them were chosen to be analysed. Among them, 363 were treated with LARVH and 326 were treated with ARH. Eight trials showed that LARVH was associated with a reduced risk of postoperative wound infection than ARH (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.1-0.55, p = 0.0009). Five trials showed that there was no difference in the risk of postoperative bleeding after surgery (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.42-3.29, p = 0.76). We also did not differ significantly in the duration of the surgery (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, -6.58 to 10.15, p = 0.68). So, the two surgical methods differ significantly only in the risk of postoperative wound infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Zhang
- Department of GynecologyThe First College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges UniversityYichangChina
| | - Yuanhong Zhou
- Department of GynecologyThe First College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges UniversityYichangChina
| | - Hong Ye
- Department of GynecologyThe First College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges UniversityYichangChina
| | - Chuanqi Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe Central Hospital Of Enshi Tujia And Miao Autonomous PrefectureEnshiChina
| | - Youzhen Luo
- Department of GynecologyThe First College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges UniversityYichangChina
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gass P, Thiel FC, Häberle L, Ackermann S, Theuser AK, Hummel N, Boehm S, Kimmig R, Reinthaller A, Becker S, Hilpert F, Janni W, Vergote I, Harter P, Emons J, Hein A, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Pöschke P. Primary results of the AGO-Zervix-1 Study: A prospective, randomized phase III study to compare the effects of paclitaxel and topotecan with those of cisplatin and topotecan in the treatment of patients with recurrent and persistent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 183:25-32. [PMID: 38490057 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Before the era of immunotherapies and antibody-drug conjugates, there were limited chemotherapeutic options for patients with recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer. Combination therapies with cisplatin have shown some superiority over monotherapy. This study examined platinum-free treatment regimens, comparing a combination of topotecan and paclitaxel (TP) with topotecan and cisplatin (TC) in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, with or without prior platinum-based treatment. METHODS The AGO-Zervix-1 Study (NCT01405235) is a prospective, randomized phase III study in which patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to treatment within the control arm with topotecan (0.75 mg/m2) on days 1-3 and cisplatin (50 mg/m2) on day 1 every 3 weeks and in the study arm topotecan (1.75 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (70 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks or treatment. The primary study aim was overall survival; progression-free survival, toxicity, and quality of life were secondary aims. The interim and final analysis is here reported after recruitment of 173 of 312 planned patients. RESULTS Median overall survival in the TP arm was 9.6 months, compared with 12.0 months in the TC arm (log-rank test, P = 0.33). Median progression-free survival rates were 4.4 months with TP and 4.2 months with TC (log-rank test, P = 0.47). Leukopenia and nausea/vomiting were more frequent in the cisplatin-containing arm. Otherwise, toxicity profiles were comparable. There were no differences in FACT-G-assessed quality of life. CONCLUSION Platinum-based combination chemotherapy remains the standard of care chemotherapy regimen for patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Falk C Thiel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Alb Fils Clinics, Klinik am Eichert, Göppingen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sven Ackermann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | - Nadine Hummel
- Institut für Frauengesundheit GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Boehm
- Institut für Frauengesundheit GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rainer Kimmig
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Reinthaller
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, AKH Vienna University Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sven Becker
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix Hilpert
- Onkologisches Therapiezentrum, Krankenhaus Jerusalem, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Phlipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Patrik Pöschke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Song YL, Li RZ, Feng BJ, Lu YH, Wang LF, Wang ZY, Pei KG, Sun LF, Li R. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with protective colpotomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108240. [PMID: 38457858 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery on treatment of early-stage cervical cancer is debatable. Traditional approaches of colpotomy are considered responsible for an inferior oncological outcome. Evidence on whether protective colpotomy could optimize minimally invasive technique and improve prognoses of women with early-stage cervical cancer remains limited. We produced a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare oncological outcomes of the patients treated by minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with protective colpotomy to those treated by open surgery according to existing literature. We explored PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to December 2022. Inclusion criteria were: (1) randomized controlled trials or observational studies published in English, (2) studies comparing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with protective colpotomy to abdominal radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer, and (3) studies comparing survival outcomes. Two reviewers performed the screening, data extraction, and quality assessment independently. A total of 8 retrospective cohort studies with 2020 women were included in the study, 821 of whom were in the minimally invasive surgery group, and 1199 of whom were in the open surgery group. The recurrence-free survival and overall survival in the minimally invasive surgery group were both similar to that in the open surgery group (pooled hazard ratio, 0.88 and 0.78, respectively; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.38 and 0.42-1.44, respectively). Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with protective colpotomy on treatment of early-stage cervical cancer had similar recurrence-free survival and overall survival compared to abdominal radical hysterectomy. Protective colpotomy could be a guaranteed approach to modifying minimally invasive technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue-Lin Song
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
| | - Rui-Zhe Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bo-Jie Feng
- West China School of Medicine of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yu-Han Lu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
| | - Li-Fei Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China
| | - Zhao-Yun Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
| | - Kai-Ge Pei
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
| | - Li-Fei Sun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China.
| | - Rui Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Taliento C, Scutiero G, Arcieri M, Pellecchia G, Tius V, Bogani G, Petrillo M, Pavone M, Bizzarri N, Driul L, Greco P, Scambia G, Restaino S, Vizzielli G. Simple hysterectomy versus radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108252. [PMID: 38471373 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis aims to compare the surgery-related results and oncological outcomes between SH and RH in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. METHOD We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane to collect studies that compared oncological and surgery-related outcomes between SH and RH groups in patients with stage IA2 and IB1 cervical cancer. A random-effect model calculated the weighted average difference of each primary outcome via Review Manager V.5.4. RESULT Seven studies comprising 6977 patients were included into our study. For oncological outcomes, we found no statistical difference in recurrence rate [OR = 0.88; 95% CI (0.50, 1.57); P = 0.68] and Overall Survival (OS) [OR = 1.23; 95% CI (0.69, 2.19), P = 0.48]. No difference was detected in the prevalence of positive LVSI and lymph nodes metastasis between the two groups. Concerning surgery-related outcomes, the comprehensive effects revealed that the bladder injury [OR = 0.28; 95% CI (0.08, 0.94), P = 0.04] and bladder disfunction [OR = 0.10; 95% CI (0.02, 0.53), P = 0.007] of the RH group were higher compared to the SH group. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggested there are no significant differences in terms of both recurrence rate and overall survival among patients with stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer undergoing SH or RH, while the SH group has better surgery-related outcomes. These data confirm the need to narrow the indication for RH in early-stage cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Taliento
- Department of Medical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Ferrara, Italy; Department of Development and Regeneration - Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Scutiero
- Department of Medical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Ferrara, Italy
| | - M Arcieri
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy; Medical Area Department (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - G Pellecchia
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy; Medical Area Department (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - V Tius
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy; Medical Area Department (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - G Bogani
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - M Petrillo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - M Pavone
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy; Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - N Bizzarri
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - L Driul
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy; Medical Area Department (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - P Greco
- Department of Medical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Ferrara, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - S Restaino
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
| | - G Vizzielli
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy; Medical Area Department (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bizzarri N, Fedele C, Teodorico E, Certelli C, Pedone Anchora L, Carbone V, Giannarelli D, Fagotti A, Zannoni GF, Valente M, Querleu D, Ferrandina G, Scambia G, Fanfani F. Survival associated with the use of one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) to detect sentinel lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108250. [PMID: 38461568 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is part of surgical treatment of apparent early-stage cervical cancer. SLN is routinely analyzed by ultrastaging and immunohistochemistry. The aim of this study was to assess the survival of patients undergoing SLN analyzed by one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) compared with ultrastaging. METHODS Single-center, retrospective, cohort study. Patients undergoing primary surgery and SLN mapping ( ±pelvic lymphadenectomy) for apparent early-stage cervical cancer between May 2017 and January 2021 were included. SLN was analyzed exclusively with OSNA or with ultrastaging. Patients with bilateral SLN mapping failure, with SLN analyzed alternatively/serially with OSNA and ultrastaging, and undergoing neo-adjuvant therapy were excluded. Baseline clinic-pathological differences between the two groups were balanced with propensity-match analysis. RESULTS One-hundred and fifty-seven patients were included, 50 (31.8%) in the OSNA group and 107 (68.2%) in the ultrastaging group. Median follow up time was 41 months (95%CI:37.9-42.2). 5-year DFS in patients undergoing OSNA versus ultrastaging was 87.0% versus 91.0% (p = 0.809) and 5-year overall survival was 97.9% versus 98.6% (p = 0.631), respectively. No difference in the incidence of lymph node recurrence between the two groups was noted (OSNA 20.0% versus ultrastaging 18.2%, p = 0.931). In the group of negative SLN, no 5-year DFS difference was noted between the two groups (p = 0.692). No 5-year DFS and OS difference was noted after propensity-match analysis (87.6% versus 87.0%, p = 0.726 and 97.4% versus 97.9%, p = 0.998, respectively). CONCLUSION The use of OSNA as method to exclusively process SLN in cervical cancer was not associated with worse DFS compared to ultrastaging. Incidence of lymph node recurrence in the two groups was not different.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Bizzarri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Camilla Fedele
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Teodorico
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Camilla Certelli
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Pedone Anchora
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Vittoria Carbone
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Biostatistics Unit, Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Gian Franco Zannoni
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Valente
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Denis Querleu
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Yun Z, Li X, Zhu D, Li L, Jiang S. A meta-analysis examining the impact of open surgical therapy versus minimally invasive surgery on wound infection in females with cervical cancer. Int Wound J 2024; 21:e14535. [PMID: 38169097 PMCID: PMC10961045 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
A meta-analysis study was executed to measure the effect of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgical management (OSM) on wound infection (WI) in female's cervical cancer (CC). A comprehensive literature study till February 2023 was applied and 1675 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 41 chosen investigations enclosed 10 204 females with CC and were in the chosen investigations' starting point, 4294 of them were utilizing MIS, and 5910 were utilizing OSM. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized to compute the value of the effect of MIS and OSM on WI in female's CC and by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. The MIS had significantly lower WI (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.15-0.35, p < 0.001) with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%) and postoperative aggregate complications (PACs) (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.37-0.64, p < 0.001) in females with CC and compared OSM. However, MIS compared with OSM in females with CC and had no significant difference in pelvic infection and abscess (PIA) (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.31-1.16, p = 0.13). The MIS had significantly lower WI, and PACs, though, had no significant difference in PIA in females with CC and compared with OSM. However, care must be exercised when dealing with its values because of the low sample size of some of the nominated investigations for the meta-analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhouhui Yun
- Obstetrics DepartmentZhejiang HospitalHangzhouChina
| | - Xiumin Li
- Obstetrics DepartmentZhejiang HospitalHangzhouChina
| | - Di Zhu
- Obstetrics DepartmentZhejiang HospitalHangzhouChina
| | - Lijie Li
- Obstetrics DepartmentZhejiang HospitalHangzhouChina
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Puppo A, Migliaretti G, Landoni F, Uccella S, Camanni M, Ceccaroni M, Delpiano EM, Mantovani G, Roviglione G, Bianchi T, Grassi T, Maggi V, Garzon S, Galli L, Calandra V, Olearo E. SUrgical Access and Pattern of Recurrence of Endometrial Cancer: The SUPeR Study, a Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024; 31:321-329. [PMID: 38301845 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To evaluate recurrence rate and pattern in apparently early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) treated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and compare it to the "historical" populations treated by laparotomy. Secondary outcomes were to establish if, among MIS recurrent patients, intermediate-high/high-risk patients presented the same recurrence pattern compared to those at low/intermediate-risk and to evaluate time to first recurrence (TTR) of the study population. DESIGN Multicenter retrospective observational study. SETTING Five Italian Gynecologic Oncology referral centers. PATIENTS All patients with proven recurrence of apparently early-stage EC treated with MIS from January 2017 to June 2022 . The laparotomic historical cohort was obtained from Laparoscopy Compared With Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (LAP2) and Laparoscopic Approach to Cancer of the Endometrium trials. INTERVENTIONS Evaluation of recurrence rate and pattern. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Seventy-seven recurrences occurred on the total of 1028 patients treated with MIS for apparently early-stage EC during a median follow-up time of 36 months. The rate of recurrence in our cohort did not differ significantly from the rate of the historical cohort (7.4% vs 7.9%, odds ratio 0.9395, 95% CI 0.6901-1.2792). No significant differences were noticed for local, abdominal, nodal, and multiple site recurrence patterns; distant site recurrence appeared more likely in patients from the historical cohort. Postoperative low/intermediate risk patients had a higher likelihood of local recurrence compared to intermediate-high/high risk patients. Mean TTR was 19 months. No significant difference of TTR was observed for each pattern of recurrence compared to others. CONCLUSION MIS appears to be safe for the treatment of early-stage EC. We did not identify any recurrence pattern specifically associated with MIS in early-stage EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Puppo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ospedale Santa Croce e Carle Cuneo (Drs. Puppo, Galli, Calandra, and Olearo)
| | - Giuseppe Migliaretti
- Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, Università of Turin (Dr. Migliaretti)
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca (Drs. Landoni and Bianchi), Milan, Italy; Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Fondazione San Gerardo dei Tintori (Drs. Landoni, Bianchi, and Grassi), Monza, Italy
| | - Stefano Uccella
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona (Drs. Uccella, Maggi, Garzon, Galli, and Calandra)
| | - Marco Camanni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Martini, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Citta' di Torino (Drs. Camanni and Delpiano)
| | - Marcello Ceccaroni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS "Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria" Hospital (Drs. Ceccaroni, Mantovani, and Roviglione), Negrar, Verona
| | - Elena M Delpiano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Martini, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Citta' di Torino (Drs. Camanni and Delpiano)
| | - Giulia Mantovani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS "Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria" Hospital (Drs. Ceccaroni, Mantovani, and Roviglione), Negrar, Verona
| | - Giovanni Roviglione
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS "Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria" Hospital (Drs. Ceccaroni, Mantovani, and Roviglione), Negrar, Verona
| | - Tommaso Bianchi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca (Drs. Landoni and Bianchi), Milan, Italy; Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Fondazione San Gerardo dei Tintori (Drs. Landoni, Bianchi, and Grassi), Monza, Italy
| | - Tommaso Grassi
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Fondazione San Gerardo dei Tintori (Drs. Landoni, Bianchi, and Grassi), Monza, Italy
| | - Veronica Maggi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona (Drs. Uccella, Maggi, Garzon, Galli, and Calandra)
| | - Simone Garzon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona (Drs. Uccella, Maggi, Garzon, Galli, and Calandra)
| | - Liliana Galli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ospedale Santa Croce e Carle Cuneo (Drs. Puppo, Galli, Calandra, and Olearo); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona (Drs. Uccella, Maggi, Garzon, Galli, and Calandra)
| | - Valerio Calandra
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ospedale Santa Croce e Carle Cuneo (Drs. Puppo, Galli, Calandra, and Olearo); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona (Drs. Uccella, Maggi, Garzon, Galli, and Calandra)
| | - Elena Olearo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ospedale Santa Croce e Carle Cuneo (Drs. Puppo, Galli, Calandra, and Olearo).
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ke Y, Zhang Z, Li Y, Qin Y, Yang Q, Zheng C. Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with non-metastatic cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy: A population-based study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108258. [PMID: 38484490 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The lymph node ratio (LNR) is an emerging prognostic biomarker in multiple malignancies. This study aimed to explore the prognostic role of LNR in patients with non-metastatic cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy. METHODS Data were extracted from the SEER 17 registry. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS). A nomogram was constructed to predict the 5-year and 10-year CSS. Survival analyses stratified by the status of LNR and different adjuvant treatments were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS A total of 8128 female patients with non-metastatic cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and regional node examination (≥8) were enrolled. Of these, 1269 (15.6%) were confirmed as lymph node-positive. Cox regression analyses showed that age, race, tumor size, tumor grade, histology, and LNR were significant factors affecting CSS. A nomogram was developed for predicting the 5-year and 10-year CSS, which showed good discrimination and calibration. Patients without lymph node involvement had inferior CSS with adjuvant treatments compared to those who did not receive further treatment. In patients with LNR ≤10%, only those receiving adjuvant radiotherapy had a trend of better CSS. In patients with an LNR between 10% and 30% and more than 30%, concurrent radiochemotherapy (CCRT) proved to be the best treatment. CONCLUSIONS LNR is an independent prognostic factor in patients with non-metastatic cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy. For patients with negative lymph nodes, no further treatment is recommended. Patients with positive lymph nodes could benefit more from CCRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingyue Ke
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shiyan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shiyan, 442099, China
| | - Zhijia Zhang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Yicheng Li
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Yan Qin
- Department of Blood Transfusion, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China
| | - Qiao Yang
- Department of Ultrasound, The 941st Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Xining, 810007, China
| | - Chengcheng Zheng
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shiyan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shiyan, 442099, China.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kyrgiou M, Bowden S, Denny L, Fagotti A, Abu-Rustum NR, Ramirez PT, Querleu D. Innovation in gynaecological cancer: highlighting global disparities. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:425-430. [PMID: 38461833 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00137-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Kyrgiou
- Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction - Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - Sarah Bowden
- Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction - Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Lynette Denny
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory, South Africa
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA)
| | - Denis Querleu
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bizzarri N, Obermair A, Hsu HC, Chacon E, Collins A, Tsibulak I, Mutombo A, Abu-Rustum NR, Balaya V, Buda A, Cibula D, Covens A, Fanfani F, Ferron G, Frumovitz M, Guani B, Kocian R, Kohler C, Leblanc E, Lecuru F, Leitao MM, Mathevet P, Mueller MD, Papadia A, Pareja R, Plante M, Querleu D, Scambia G, Tanner E, Zapardiel I, Garcia JR, Ramirez PT. Consensus on surgical technique for sentinel lymph node dissection in cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:504-509. [PMID: 38378695 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to establish a consensus on the surgical technique for sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection in cervical cancer. METHODS A 26 question survey was emailed to international expert gynecological oncology surgeons. A two-step modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus. After a first round of online survey, the questions were amended and a second round, along with semistructured interviews was performed. Consensus was defined using a 70% cut-off for agreement. RESULTS Twenty-five of 38 (65.8%) experts responded to the first and second rounds of the online survey. Agreement ≥70% was reached for 13 (50.0%) questions in the first round and for 15 (57.7%) in the final round. Consensus agreement identified 15 recommended, three optional, and five not recommended steps. Experts agreed on the following recommended procedures: use of indocyanine green as a tracer; superficial (with or without deep) injection at 3 and 9 o'clock; injection at the margins of uninvolved mucosa avoiding vaginal fornices; grasping the cervix with forceps only in part of the cervix is free of tumor; use of a minimally invasive approach for SLN biopsy in the case of simple trachelectomy/conization; identification of the ureter, obliterated umbilical artery, and external iliac vessels before SLN excision; commencing the dissection at the level of the uterine artery and continuing laterally; and completing dissection in one hemi-pelvis before proceeding to the contralateral side. Consensus was also reached in recommending against injection at 6 and 12 o'clock, and injection directly into the tumor in cases of the tumor completely replacing the cervix; against removal of nodes through port without protective maneuvers; absence of an ultrastaging protocol; and against modifying tracer concentration at the time of re-injection after mapping failure. CONCLUSION Recommended, optional, and not recommended steps of SLN dissection in cervical cancer have been identified based on consensus among international experts. These represent a surgical guide that may be used by surgeons in clinical trials and for quality assurance in routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Bizzarri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andreas Obermair
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Heng-Cheng Hsu
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Enrique Chacon
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Anna Collins
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Irina Tsibulak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Alex Mutombo
- Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Congo (Democratic Republic of the)
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vincent Balaya
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Felix Guyon Hospital, CHU Nord Réunion, France
| | - Alessandro Buda
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Ospedale Michele e Pietro Ferrero, Verduno, Italy
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Allan Covens
- Gynecologic Oncology, Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gwenaël Ferron
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Michael Frumovitz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Benedetta Guani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fribourg Hospitals, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Roman Kocian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Christhardt Kohler
- Department of Gynaecology, University of Cologne, Koln, Germany
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg-Altona, Asklepios Hospital Group, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Eric Leblanc
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Fabrice Lecuru
- Breast, Gynaecology, and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Patrice Mathevet
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois Departement de gynecologie-obstetrique et genetique medicale, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Michael D Mueller
- Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Inselspital University Hospital Berne Department of Gynaecology, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Papadia
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
- Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Rene Pareja
- Department of Gynaecology, Gynaecologic Oncology, Clinica Astorga, Medellin, Colombia
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Edward Tanner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaime R Garcia
- Department of Academic Analytics and Technology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bellotti JA, Gutierres IG, Furtado YL, Patury P, Figueiredo JDA, Guitmann G, Fiorelli RKA, da Silva FC. Surgical, oncologic, and obstetric outcomes of radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: results from a retrospective cohort study at Brazil National Cancer Institute. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1267625. [PMID: 38525414 PMCID: PMC10958530 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1267625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective to analyze oncological, obstetrical, and surgical results of young early-stage cervical cancer patients who underwent radical trachelectomy (RT) surgery and wished to maintain their fertility. Methodology a retrospective cohort study was carried out concerning cases attended at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute Gynecology Oncology Service. Patients who underwent RT between January 2005 and January 2021 were included. Results A total of 32 patients with median age of 32 years old, 62.5% of whom were nulliparous, were assessed. Concerning cancer type, 65.6% squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cases, 31.2% adenocarcinoma cases and 3.1% adenosquamous carcinoma cases were verified. Stage IA2 was evidenced in 12.5% of the patients and stage IB < 4 cm in 87.5%. Regarding surgical approaches, 68.25% of the patients underwent vaginal RT (VRT), 18.75%, abdominal RT (ART), 9.3%, the robotic radical trachelectomy (RORT) and 3.1%, video laparoscopy radical trachelectomy (VLRT). The median number of removed lymph nodes was 14, with only two detected as positive. Two cases of positive surgical margins were noted. A total of 3.1% intraoperative and 31.25% postoperative complications were observed, with cervical stenosis being the most common. The recurrence rate of the study was 3.1%, with a median follow-up time of 87 months, where 3.1% deaths occurred. The pregnancy rate of the study was 17.85% (5/28), with 54.5% evolving to live births and 45.5% evolving to abortion. Conclusion Radical trachelectomy is a feasible procedure presenting good oncological results and acceptable pregnancy rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Augusto Bellotti
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rio de Janeiro State Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Isabella Gonçalves Gutierres
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rio de Janeiro State Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil
| | - Yara Lúcia Furtado
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rio de Janeiro State Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Department of Gynecology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Patricia Patury
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | | | - Gustavo Guitmann
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | | | - Fernanda Campos da Silva
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rio de Janeiro State Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Yoon HJ, Kwon BS, Rho HJ, Lee TH, Jeong DH, Kim KH, Suh DS, Song YJ. Comparison of survival outcome of open, total laparoscopic, and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for stage IB2 cervical cancer patients: A multicenter retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e37426. [PMID: 38457577 PMCID: PMC10919498 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000037426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare survival outcomes of 3 different radical hysterectomy (RH) types, namely total abdominal radical hysterectomy (TARH), total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH), and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH), in patients with FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer. We retrospectively identified a cohort of patients who underwent RH for cervical cancer between 2010 and 2017. Patients with stage IB2 cervical cancer were included and were classified into TARH, TLRH, and LARVH treatment groups. Survival outcomes were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to estimate the independent association of RH technique with outcome. 194 patients were included in this study: 79 patients in the TARH group, 55 in the TLRH group, and 60 in the LARVH group. No significant differences were found in clinicopathological characteristics between the 3 RH groups. On comparing survival outcomes with TARH, both TLRH and LARVH showed no significant difference in terms of 5-year overall survival (TARH vs TLRH, P = .121 and TARH vs LARVH, P = .436). Conversely, compared to the TARH group, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly worse in the TLRH group (P = .034) but not in the LARVH group (P = .288). Multivariate analysis showed that TLRH surgical approach (hazard ratio, 3.232; 95% confidence interval, 1.238-8.438; P = .017) was an independent prognostic factor for PFS in patients with IB2 cervical cancer. Our study suggests that in patients with FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer, among the minimally invasive RH approaches, TLRH and LARVH, only TLRH approach was associated with worse PFS when compared with the TARH approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Joon Yoon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
- Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Su Kwon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Jin Rho
- College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Hwa Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Hoon Jeong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Hyung Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Soo Suh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Jung Song
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Chen W, Wang R, Wu J, Wu Y, Xiao L. Comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes between different surgical approaches for overweight or obese cervical cancer patients. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:107. [PMID: 38436785 PMCID: PMC10912340 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01863-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
The purpose was to investigate the safety and advantages of different surgical approaches applied to overweight or obese cervical cancer patients by comparing their surgical and oncological outcomes. This is a retrospective cohort study. 382 patients with a body mass index of at least 24.0 kg/m2 and stage IB-IIA (The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, FIGO 2009) cervical cancer were enrolled, and then were divided into three groups: open radical hysterectomy (ORH) group, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) group, and robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (RRH) group according to the surgical approach. IBM SPSS version 25.0 was used to analyze data. There were 51 patients in ORH group, 225 patients in LRH group and 106 patients in RRH group. In the comparison of surgical outcomes, compared to LRH and ORH, RRH had the shortest operating time, the least estimated blood loss, the shortest postoperative hospital stay, and the shortest recovery time for bowel function (P < 0.05). In the comparison of postoperative complications, ORH has the highest rate of postoperative infection and wound complication compared to LRH and RRH (P < 0.05), and RRH has the highest proportion of urinary retention. After a median follow-up time of 61 months, there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in terms of 5-year overall survival (OS) rate and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate, (P = 0.262, P = 0.453). In patients with overweight or obese cervical cancer, the long-term outcomes of the three surgical approaches were comparable, with RRH showing significant advantages over ORH and LRH in terms of surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanli Chen
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Rong Wang
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Jialin Wu
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Yingyu Wu
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Lin Xiao
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Armbrust R, Davies-Oliveira J, Sehouli J. Health-related quality of life metrics as endpoints in surgical trials: hype or hope? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:447-450. [PMID: 38438183 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The management of gynecological cancer has evolved considerably over the past decades in almost every field of treatment. Surgery plays a major role in the treatment algorithm. However, these invasive interventions can have profound implications for the quality of life (QoL) of affected individuals. The routine implementation of QoL measurements in clinical trials has become common, reflecting a new research 'standard', despite the fact that all available QoL instruments were not designed nor validated prospectively for surgical trials. This review seeks to address whether patient reported outcomes and QoL measurements rightfully take center stage in current surgical trials, leading to direct implementation for the benefit of patient care, or are they simply more of a researcher's hope. We will also provide an 'action plan' to better implement QoL measurements in future surgical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Armbrust
- Gynecology with Center of Oncological Surgery, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Jalid Sehouli
- Gynecology with Center of Oncological Surgery, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Akhtar K, Alkhaffaf B, Ariyarathenam A, Avery K, Barham P, Bateman A, Beard C, Berrisford R, Blazeby JM, Blencowe N, Boddy A, Bowrey D, Bracey T, Brierley RC, Briton K, Byrne J, Catton J, Chaparala R, Clark SK, Clarke T, Cooke J, Couper G, Culliford L, Dawson H, Deans C, Donovan JL, Ekblad C, Elliott J, Exon D, Falk S, Farooq N, Garfield K, Gaunt DM, Gill F, Goldin R, Gravani A, Hanna G, Hayes S, Heys R, Hindmarsh C, Hollinghurst S, Hollingworth W, Hollowood A, Houlihan R, Howes B, Howie L, Humphreys L, Hutton D, Jarvis R, Jepson M, Kandiyali R, Kaur S, Kaye P, Kelly J, King A, Kirwin J, Krysztopik R, Lamb P, Lang A, Lee V, Maitland S, Mapstone N, Melia G, Metcalfe C, Melhado R, Moure-Fernandez A, Nair B, Nicklin J, Noble F, Noble SM, O’Connell A, Palmer S, Parsons S, Pursnani K, Rea N, Reed F, Rice C, Richards C, Rogers C, Sanders G, Save V, Shaw C, Schiller M, Schranz R, Shetty V, Shirkey B, Singleton J, Skipworth R, Smith J, Streets C, Titcomb D, Turner P, Ubhi S, Underwood T, Vinod C, Vohra R, Ward EM, Warman R, Welch N, Wheatley T, White K, Wickens RA, Wilkerson P, Williams A, Williams R, Wilmshurst N, Wong NACS. Laparoscopic or open abdominal surgery with thoracotomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: ROMIO randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae023. [PMID: 38525931 PMCID: PMC10961947 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study investigated if hybrid oesophagectomy with minimally invasive gastric mobilization and thoracotomy enabled faster recovery than open surgery. METHODS In eight UK centres, this pragmatic RCT recruited patients for oesophagectomy to treat localized cancer. Participants were randomly allocated to hybrid or open surgery, stratified by centre and receipt of neoadjuvant treatment. Large dressings aimed to mask patients to their allocation for six days post-surgery. The authors present the intention-to-treat analysis of outcome measures from the first 3 months post-randomization, including the primary outcome, the patient-reported physical function scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30, and cost-effectiveness. Current Controlled Trials registration: ISRCTN 59036820 (feasibility study), 10386621 (definitive study). FINDINGS There was no evidence of a difference between hybrid (n = 267) and open (n = 266) surgery in average physical function over 3 months post-randomization: difference in means 2.1, 95% c.i. -2.0 to 6.2, P = 0.3. Complication rates were similar; for example, 88 (34%) participants in the open and 82 (32%) participants in the hybrid surgery groups experienced a pulmonary infection within 30 days. There was no evidence that hybrid surgery was more cost-effective than open surgery at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS Patient-reported physical function in the 3 months post-randomization provided no evidence of a difference in recovery time between hybrid and open surgery, or a difference in cost-effectiveness. Both approaches to surgery were completed safely, with a similar risk of key complications, suggesting that surgeons who have a preference for one of the two approaches need not change their practice.
Collapse
|
48
|
Takekuma M. Challenges and perspectives on less invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: a critical analysis of the SHAPE trial and its implications. J Gynecol Oncol 2024; 35:e48. [PMID: 38499045 PMCID: PMC10948994 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e48] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
|
49
|
Balafoutas D, Vlahos N. The role of minimally invasive surgery in gynaecological cancer: an overview of current trends. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2024; 16:23-33. [PMID: 38551472 PMCID: PMC11198884 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.16.1.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The capabilities of minimally invasive surgery, either as conventional laparoscopy, or as robotic surgery, have increased to an extent that it enables complex operations in the field of gynaecological oncology. Objective To document the role of minimally invasive gynaecological surgery in cancer. Materials and methods A review of the literature that shaped international guidelines and clinical practice. Main outcome measures Current guidelines of major international scientific associations and trends in accepted clinical practice. Results In recent years, evidence on oncologic outcome has limited the role of minimally invasive techniques in cervical cancer, while the treatment of early endometrial cancer with laparoscopy and robotic surgery has become the international standard. In ovarian cancer, the role of minimally invasive surgery is still limited. Current evidence on perioperative morbidity underlines the necessity to implicate minimally invasive techniques whenever possible. Conclusion The optimal surgical route for the treatment of gynaecological cancer remains in many cases controversial. The role of minimally invasive surgery remains increasing in the course of time. What is new? This comprehensive review offers an entire perspective on the current role of minimally invasive surgery in gynaecological cancer therapy.
Collapse
|
50
|
Zhu X, Ye L, Fu Y, You B, Lu W. Radical Hysterectomy With Preoperative Conization in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024; 31:193-199. [PMID: 38016630 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The investigation of the role of preoperative conization in cervical cancer aiming to explore its potential clinical significance. DATA SOURCES Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science, up to April 28, 2023. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION (1) Observational cohort studies, (2) studies comparing radical hysterectomy with preoperative conization (CO) vs radical hysterectomy without preoperative conization (NCO) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer, and (3) studies comparing disease-free survival outcomes. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed the quality of the studies. The meta-analysis used combined hazard ratios along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals to compare CO and NCO. We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to compare minimally invasive CO, open CO, minimally invasive NCO, and open NCO. Our study included 15 retrospective trials, 10 of which were used to traditional pairwise meta-analysis and 8 for network meta-analysis. The NCO group exhibited a notably higher probability of cancer recurrence than the CO group (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.65). In the network meta-analysis, minimally invasive NCO showed the worst survival outcome. CONCLUSION Preoperative conization seems to be a protective factor in decreasing recurrence risk, assisting clinicians in predicting survival outcomes for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. It may potentially aid in selecting suitable candidates for minimally invasive surgery in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinbin Zhu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology (Zhu, You, and Dr. Lu), Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lele Ye
- Women's Reproductive Health Laboratory of Zhejiang Province (Drs. Ye and Lu), Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yunfeng Fu
- Medical Centre for Cervical Diseases (Dr. Fu), Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Fu and Lu), Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Bingbing You
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology (Zhu, You, and Dr. Lu), Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Weiguo Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology (Zhu, You, and Dr. Lu), Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Women's Reproductive Health Laboratory of Zhejiang Province (Drs. Ye and Lu), Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Fu and Lu), Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|