Influence of substituents on the nature of metal⋯π interaction and its cooperativity with halogen bond

Can we quantitatively evaluate the mutual impacts of intramolecular metal-ligand bonds the same as intermolecular noncovalent bonds?

In this paper, we have reviewed several equations for calculating the cooperative energy of two chemical bonds between three fragments/species, regardless of whether they are atoms, ions or molecules, and whether the bonds between them are intra- or intermolecular. It is emphasized that two chemical bonds upon cooperation in a new compound change the bond dissociation energy of each other exactly by the same quantitative value, their cooperative energy, regardless of the nature of the bonds or whether one bond is very weak and another one is very strong. However, the final benefit/drawback of weak bonds from this cooperation can be considerably larger than that of strong bonds. The above statements are supported by a computational study on the various types of inter- and intramolecular chemical bonds.

Theoretical investigation on the nature of substituted benzene⋯AuX interactions: covalent or noncovalent?

The nature of interactions between AuX (X = F, Cl, Br, CN, NO2, CH3) and aromatic moieties with different electronic properties has been investigated for possible tuning of coinage–metal bonds by varying the substituents.

Synergistic and Diminutive Effects between Regium and Aerogen Bonds

The aerogen bond is formed in complexes of HCN-XeF₂ O and C₂ H₄ -XeF₂ O. The lone pair on the N atom of HCN is a better electron donor in the aerogen bond than the π electron on the C=C bond of C₂ H₄ . The coinage substitution strengthens the aerogen bond in MCN-XeF₂ O (M=Cu, Ag, and Au) and its enhancing effect becomes larger in the Au<Cu<Ag pattern. The aerogen bond is further enhanced by the regium bond in C₂ H₂ -MCN-XeF₂ O and C₂ H₄ -MCN-XeF₂ O, but is weakened by the regium bond in MCN-C₂ H₄ -XeF₂ O and C₂ (CN)₄ -MCN-XeF₂ O. Simultaneously, the regium bond is also strengthened or weakened in these triads. The synergistic and diminutive effects between regium and aerogen bonds have been explained by means of charge transfer and electrostatic potentials.

Coinage-Metal Bond between [1.1.1]Propellane and M2/MCl/MCH3 (M = Cu, Ag, and Au): Cooperativity and Substituents

A coinage-metal bond has been predicted and characterized in the complexes of [1.1.1]propellane (P) and M₂/MCl/MCH₃ (M = Cu, Ag, and Au). The interaction energy varies between −16 and −47 kcal/mol, indicating that the bridgehead carbon atom of P has a good affinity for the coinage atom. The coinage-metal bond becomes stronger in the Ag < Cu < Au sequence. Relative to M₂, both MCl and MCH₃ engage in a stronger coinage-metal bond, both -Cl and -CH₃ groups showing an electron-withdrawing property. The formation of coinage-metal bonding is mainly attributed to the donation orbital interactions from the occupied C-C orbital into the empty metal orbitals and a back-donation from the occupied d orbital of metal into the empty C-C anti-bonding orbital. In most complexes, the coinage-metal bond is dominated by electrostatic interaction, with moderate contribution of polarization. When P binds simultaneously with two coinage donors, negative cooperativity is found. Moreover, this cooperativity is prominent for the stronger coinage-metal bond.

Regulation of coin metal substituents and cooperativity on the strength and nature of tetrel bonds

Ab initio calculations have been performed for the tetrel-bonded dyad MCN⋯TF₄ (M = Cu, Ag, and Au; T = C, Si, Ge, and Sn) and C₂H₄…MCN…TF₄ and C₂(CN)₄…MCN…TF₄.