Computational models of migration modes improve our understanding of metastasis

Positive and negative durotaxis - mechanisms and emerging concepts

Cell migration is controlled by the coordinated action of cell adhesion, cytoskeletal dynamics, contractility and cell extrinsic cues. Integrins are the main adhesion receptors to ligands of the extracellular matrix (ECM), linking the actin cytoskeleton to the ECM and enabling cells to sense matrix rigidity and mount a directional cell migration response to stiffness gradients. Most models studied show preferred migration of single cells or cell clusters towards increasing rigidity. This is referred to as durotaxis, and since its initial discovery in 2000, technical advances and elegant computational models have provided molecular level details of stiffness sensing in cell migration. However, modeling has long predicted that, depending on cell intrinsic factors, such as the balance of cell adhesion molecules (clutches) and the motor proteins pulling on them, cells might also prefer adhesion to intermediate rigidity. Recently, experimental evidence has supported this notion and demonstrated the ability of cells to migrate towards lower rigidity, in a process called negative durotaxis. In this Review, we discuss the significant conceptual advances that have been made in our appreciation of cell plasticity and context dependency in stiffness-guided directional cell migration.

Adhesion tunes speed and persistence by coordinating protrusions and extracellular matrix remodeling

Cell migration through 3D environments is essential to development, disease, and regeneration processes. Conceptual models of migration have been developed primarily on the basis of 2D cell behaviors, but a general understanding of 3D cell migration is still lacking due to the added complexity of the extracellular matrix. Here, using a multiplexed biophysical imaging approach for single-cell analysis of human cell lines, we show how the subprocesses of adhesion, contractility, actin cytoskeletal dynamics, and matrix remodeling integrate to produce heterogeneous migration behaviors. This single-cell analysis identifies three modes of cell speed and persistence coupling, driven by distinct modes of coordination between matrix remodeling and protrusive activity. The framework that emerges establishes a predictive model linking cell trajectories to distinct subprocess coordination states.

A multiscale whole-cell theory for mechanosensitive migration on viscoelastic substrates

Increasing experimental evidence validates that both the elastic stiffness and viscosity of the extracellular matrix regulate mesenchymal cell behavior, such as the rational switch between durotaxis (cell migration to stiffer regions), anti-durotaxis (migration to softer regions), and adurotaxis (stiffness-insensitive migration). To reveal the mechanisms underlying the crossover between these motility regimes, we have developed a multiscale chemomechanical whole-cell theory for mesenchymal migration. Our framework couples the subcellular focal adhesion dynamics at the cell-substrate interface with the cellular cytoskeletal mechanics and the chemical signaling pathways involving Rho GTPase proteins. Upon polarization by the Rho GTPase gradients, our simulated cell migrates by concerted peripheral protrusions and contractions, a hallmark of the mesenchymal mode. The resulting cell dynamics quantitatively reproduces the experimental migration speed as a function of the uniform substrate stiffness and explains the influence of viscosity on the migration efficiency. In the presence of stiffness gradients and absence of chemical polarization, our simulated cell can exhibit durotaxis, anti-durotaxis, and adurotaxis respectively with increasing substrate stiffness or viscosity. The cell moves toward an optimally stiff region from softer regions during durotaxis and from stiffer regions during anti-durotaxis. We show that cell polarization through steep Rho GTPase gradients can reverse the migration direction dictated by the mechanical cues. Overall, our theory demonstrates that opposing durotactic behaviors emerge via the interplay between intracellular signaling and cell-medium mechanical interactions in agreement with experiments, thereby elucidating complex mechanosensing at the single-cell level.

A novel integrated experimental and computational approach to unravel fibroblast motility in response to chemical gradients in 3D collagen matrices

Fibroblasts play an essential role in tissue repair and regeneration as they migrate to wounded areas to secrete and remodel the extracellular matrix. Fibroblasts recognize chemical substances such as growth factors, which enhance their motility towards the wounded tissues through chemotaxis. Although several studies have characterized single-cell fibroblast motility before, the migration patterns of fibroblasts in response to external factors have not been fully explored in 3D environments. We present a study that combines experimental and computational efforts to characterize the effect of chemical stimuli on the invasion of 3D collagen matrices by fibroblasts. Experimentally, we used microfluidic devices to create chemical gradients using collagen matrices of distinct densities. We evaluated how cell migration patterns were affected by the presence of growth factors and the mechanical properties of the matrix. Based on these results, we present a discrete-based computational model to simulate cell motility, which we calibrated through the quantitative comparison of experimental and computational data via Bayesian optimization. By combining these approaches, we predict that fibroblasts respond to both the presence of chemical factors and their spatial location. Furthermore, our results show that the presence of these chemical gradients could be reproduced by our computational model through increases in the magnitude of cell-generated forces and enhanced cell directionality. Although these model predictions require further experimental validation, we propose that our framework can be applied as a tool that takes advantage of experimental data to guide the calibration of models and predict which mechanisms at the cellular level may justify the experimental findings. Consequently, these new insights may also guide the design of new experiments, tailored to validate the variables of interest identified by the model.

Unravelling cell migration: defining movement from the cell surface

Cell motility is essential for life and development. Unfortunately, cell migration is also linked to several pathological processes, such as cancer metastasis. Cells' ability to migrate relies on many actors. Cells change their migratory strategy based on their phenotype and the properties of the surrounding microenvironment. Cell migration is, therefore, an extremely complex phenomenon. Researchers have investigated cell motility for more than a century. Recent discoveries have uncovered some of the mysteries associated with the mechanisms involved in cell migration, such as intracellular signaling and cell mechanics. These findings involve different players, including transmembrane receptors, adhesive complexes, cytoskeletal components , the nucleus, and the extracellular matrix. This review aims to give a global overview of our current understanding of cell migration.

Engineering cell-substrate interactions on porous membranes for microphysiological systems

Microphysiological systems are now widely used to recapitulate physiological and pathological microenvironments in order to study and understand a variety of cellular processes as well as drug delivery and stem cell differentiation. Central to many of these systems are porous membranes that enable tissue barrier formation as well as compartmentalization while still facilitating small molecule diffusion, cellular transmigration and cell-cell communication. The role or impact of porous membranes on the cells cultured upon them has not been widely studied or reviewed. Although many chemical and physical substrate characteristics have been shown to be effective in controlling and directing cellular behavior, the influence of pore characteristics and the ability to engineer porous membranes to influence these responses is not fully understood. In this mini-review, we show that many studies point to a multiphasic cell-substrate response, where increasing pore sizes and pore-pore spacing generally leads to improved cell-substrate interactions. However, the smallest pores in the nano-scale sometimes promote the strongest cell-substrate interactions, while the very largest micron-scale pores hinder cell-substrate interactions. This synopsis provides an insight into the importance of membrane pores in controlling cellular responses, and may help with the design and utilization of porous membranes for induction of desired cell processes in the development of biomimetic platforms.

Optogenetic control of intracellular flows and cell migration: A comprehensive mathematical analysis with a minimal active gel model

The actin cytoskeleton of cells is in continuous motion due to both polymerization of new filaments and their contraction by myosin II molecular motors. Through adhesion to the substrate, such intracellular flow can be converted into cell migration. Recently, optogenetics has emerged as a new powerful experimental method to control both actin polymerization and myosin II contraction. While optogenetic control of polymerization can initiate cell migration by generating protrusion, it is less clear if and how optogenetic control of contraction can also affect cell migration. Here we analyze the latter situation using a minimal variant of active gel theory into which we include optogenetic activation as a spatiotemporally constrained perturbation. The model can describe the symmetrical flow of the actomyosin system observed in optogenetic experiments, but not the long-lasting polarization required for cell migration. Motile solutions become possible if cytoskeletal polymerization is included through the boundary conditions. Optogenetic activation of contraction can then initiate locomotion in a symmetrically spreading cell and strengthen motility in an asymmetrically polymerizing one. If designed appropriately, it can also arrest motility even for protrusive boundaries.

Adhesion strength and contractility enable metastatic cells to become adurotactic

Significant changes in cell stiffness, contractility, and adhesion, i.e., mechanotype, are observed during a variety of biological processes. Whether cell mechanics merely change as a side effect of or driver for biological processes is still unclear. Here, we sort genotypically similar metastatic cancer cells into strongly adherent (SA) versus weakly adherent (WA) phenotypes to study how contractility and adhesion differences alter the ability of cells to sense and respond to gradients in material stiffness. We observe that SA cells migrate up a stiffness gradient, or durotax, while WA cells largely ignore the gradient, i.e., adurotax. Biophysical modeling and experimental validation suggest that differences in cell migration and durotaxis between weakly and strongly adherent cells are driven by differences in intra-cellular actomyosin activity. These results provide a direct relationship between cell phenotype and durotaxis and suggest how, unlike other senescent cells, metastatic cancer cells navigate against stiffness gradients.