1
|
Tomblinson CM, Stowell JT, Zavaletta V, Freeman N, Yong-Hing CJ, Carroll EF, Willis MH, Flores EJ, Spalluto LB. Beyond the Binary: Moving the Radiology Workforce Toward Gender Inclusion, From the AJR Special Series on DEI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 221:425-432. [PMID: 36919881 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.28967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
Gender representation in radiology has traditionally been evaluated and reported through binary models, accompanied by advocacy efforts focused on increasing the number of women in radiology. A paucity of data exists to understand the entire gender composition of the radiology workforce, including representation of people who are transgender and gender diverse. Further, little information exists on how to provide a supportive work environment for radiologists and support staff who identify as belonging to an underrepresented gender minority group. Intentional efforts to comprehensively understand the gender representation of the radiology workforce can help to establish a diverse workforce that is more representative of the patient populations that we serve, while promoting high-quality inclusive health care. Moving beyond gender binary thought and practices can help foster a culture of inclusion and belonging in radiology. This article provides practical steps that radiology practices can take to understand and support gender diversity beyond the binary in the radiology workforce, including providing definitions and inclusive language, understanding limitations of historical methods of gender data collection in radiology and relevant published literature, establishing best practices for future data collection, and developing a strategic vision with action items to create a more inclusive work environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney M Tomblinson
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, MCN CCC-1118, Nashville, TN 37232
| | - Justin T Stowell
- Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Vaz Zavaletta
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Charlotte J Yong-Hing
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Evelyn F Carroll
- Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Marc H Willis
- Department of Radiology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Efren J Flores
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lucy B Spalluto
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, MCN CCC-1118, Nashville, TN 37232
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
- Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Health Care System Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xiao N, Marquez-Karry R, Oliveira DFM, Berggruen S, Horowitz JM. Gender Disparities in Academic Radiology Authorship: A 13-Year Review. Acad Radiol 2023; 30:1714-1720. [PMID: 36424312 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Underrepresentation of women in many scientific fields has been linked to biases against female-authored publications in peer-reviewed journals, thereby reducing their opportunities for career development and promotions. The objective of this study is to determine the representation of female academic radiologists in four flagship general radiology journals to elucidate gender-specific trends and disparities in academic radiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed 23,741 peer-reviewed articles published in Radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology, Journal of the American College of Radiology and Academic Radiology from 2007 to 2020. Data abstraction and statistical analysis were performed for author gender, first and last authorship, research funding, and number of citations and grants. Baseline demographics data of academic radiologists was obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). RESULTS A total of 72.4% of authors were male with 54% of articles were written by a male first author and male last author. When compared with assumed random pairing, there were significantly fewer Male/Female author combinations and more Female/Female author combinations than expected (p<0.01). Over the 13-year time period, the rate of increase in the number of female authors exceeded the rate of increase in women in academic radiology as reported by the AAMC. Female last authors received on average 3.2 less citations than their male counterparts (p=.03). Of manuscripts with last female authors, 31.7% of female last authors were funded compared to 25.9% of last male authors. CONCLUSION This study showed the increasing numbers and higher productivity of female authors in academic radiology, suggesting progress is being made in overcoming gender disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Xiao
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Diego F M Oliveira
- Social Data Science Center - SoDa, College of Information Studies, University of Maryland, Maryland
| | - Senta Berggruen
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jeanne M Horowitz
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gibson LM, Wood KL, Wardlaw JM. Towards equality: gender representation at the Royal College of Radiologists' Annual Scientific Meeting 2014-2021. Wellcome Open Res 2023; 7:291. [PMID: 37577449 PMCID: PMC10422055 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18439.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Conferences facilitate career advancement, but gender imbalances in public fora may negatively impact both women and men, and society. We aimed to describe the gender distribution of presenters at the UK's 2014-2021 Royal College of Radiologists' (RCR) Annual Scientific Meeting. Methods: We extracted data on presenter name, role and session type from meeting programmes. We classified gender as male or female using names, records or personal pronouns, accepting the limitations of these categories. We classified roles by prestige: lead, other (speakers and workshop faculty), proffered paper or poster presenters. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between gender and binary outcomes using logistic regression. Results: Women held 1,059 (37.5%) of 2,826 conference roles and presented 9/27 keynotes. Compared to men, women were less likely to hold other roles such as speakers and workshop faculty (OR 0.72 95% CI 0.61-0.83), and more likely to present posters (OR 1.49 95% CI 1.27-1.76). There were 60 male-only and eight women-only multi-presenter sessions. Sessions led by women had higher proportions of women speakers. The odds of roles being held by women increased during online meetings during COVID in 2020 and 2021 (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.36-1.91) compared to earlier years. Conclusion: The proportion of women presenters and keynote speakers reflects that of RCR membership, but not of wider society. Disadvantage starts from the earliest career stages, prejudicing career opportunities. Efforts to improve inclusion and diversity are needed; focusing on lead roles and hybrid online/in-person formats may accelerate change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna M. Gibson
- Centre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kayleigh L. Wood
- Department of Clinical Radiology, New Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Joanna M. Wardlaw
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Imaging, and Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gibson LM, Wood KL, Wardlaw JM. Towards equality: gender representation at the Royal College of Radiologists’ Annual Scientific Meeting 2014-2021. Wellcome Open Res 2022. [DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18439.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Conferences facilitate career advancement, but gender imbalances in public fora may negatively impact both women and men, and society. We aimed to describe the gender distribution of presenters at the UK’s 2014-2021 Royal College of Radiologists’ (RCR) Annual Scientific Meeting. Methods: We extracted data on presenter name, role and session type from meeting programmes. We classified gender as male or female using names, records or personal pronouns, accepting the limitations of these categories. We classified roles by prestige: lead, other (speakers and workshop faculty), proffered paper or poster presenters. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between gender and binary outcomes using logistic regression. Results: Women held 1,059 (37.5%) of 2,826 conference roles and presented 9/27 keynotes. Compared to men, women were less likely to hold other roles such as speakers and workshop faculty (OR 0.72 95% CI 0.61-0.83), and more likely to present posters (OR 1.49 95% CI 1.27-1.76). There were 60 male-only and eight women-only multi-presenter sessions. Sessions led by women had higher proportions of women speakers. The odds of roles being held by women increased during online meetings during COVID (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.36-1.91). Conclusion: The proportion of women presenters and keynote speakers reflects that of RCR membership, but not of the patient population. Disadvantage starts from the earliest career stages, prejudicing career opportunities. Efforts to improve inclusion and diversity are needed; focusing on lead roles and hybrid online/in-person formats may accelerate change.
Collapse
|
5
|
Pitot MA, White MA, Edney E, Mogensen MA, Solberg A, Kattapuram T, Sinha C, Kadom N. You Too? Female Radiologists' Narratives on Discrimination and Harassment. J Am Coll Radiol 2021; 19:288-303. [PMID: 34822789 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.09.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a paucity of examples for gender discrimination and sexual harassment in radiology. This lack of knowledge can limit radiologists' ability to relate to this topic, acknowledge its importance and impact, and take actions toward improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a qualitative analysis using the model of thematic analysis developed by Braun and Clarke of narrative responses to a survey on the topic of #MeToo, which was distributed to a social media group of female radiologists. RESULTS In all, 575 anonymous survey responses from 3,265 social media group members were analyzed. Among these responses, the study team identified important themes with examples, including Victims and Perpetrators, Acts of Gender Discrimination, Inequalities, Sexual Harassment and Assault, and Microaggressions. CONCLUSION The narratives provide relatable examples of gender discrimination and sexual harassment in radiology. These may spark discussions that raise awareness among radiologists and result in interventions geared toward improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marika A Pitot
- Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Marney A White
- Director, Online Education Social and Behavioral Sciences Track; and Director, Essential Topics in Public Health, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Monique A Mogensen
- Neuroradiology Fellowship Program Director and Co-Chair, Radiation Safety Subcommittee, Quality and Safety Committee, University of Washington and University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Taj Kattapuram
- RadKatt, La Crosse, Wisconsin; ACR, Council Steering Committee; and Wisconsin Rad Society, Board Director-at-Large
| | - Cynthia Sinha
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology-BMT, Emory University, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia; and Editorial Board Member, Journal of Marriage and Family
| | - Nadja Kadom
- Director for Quality, Department of Radiology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia; Director for Quality Education, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; and Associate Professor, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.
| |
Collapse
|