Evaluation of Current and Future Medical Staff Knowledge on the Course of Trauma Patient Management

INTRODUCTION

Management of injuries, especially in life-threatening situations, is critical to morbidity and mortality for trauma patients. The qualifications of medical staff and students in medicine, emergency medical services, and nursing help to ensure consistent, high-quality care for patients. The study aimed to assess the knowledge of our staff and learners in the management of trauma patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was carried out using a proprietary research tool consisting of 47 questions, including six independent variables. The knowledge assessment tool has been divided into five categories according to the degree of difficulty. The questions have been created based on the current guidelines of the ERC 2021, ITLS, PTLS, and TCCC.

RESULTS

The study included 295 subjects (medical students, nursing students, students of emergency medical services, physicians, paramedics, and nurses). The vast majority of respondents (79.7%) have never participated in a certified trauma course. Respondents could obtain a total of 117 points for answering all questions. The highest score was 111 points, and the lowest was 26 points. The average score was 63 points. Paramedics received the highest average score of 78 points. The question with the smallest number of correct answers concerned the priority procedure in the case of an electric shock victim.

CONCLUSION

Better training in trauma patient management is needed for both current medical staff and students. A certified trauma course is a good source of knowledge and skills, but it would need to be repeated periodically. This would ensure an increase in the competence of medical staff involved in the care of trauma patients.

High-Risk Airway Management in the Emergency Department: Diseases and Approaches, Part II

BACKGROUND

Successful airway management is critical to the practice of emergency medicine. Thus, emergency physicians must be ready to optimize and prepare for airway management in critically ill patients with a wide range of physiologic challenges. Challenges in airway management commonly encountered in the emergency department are discussed using a pearl and pitfall discussion in this second part of a 2-part series.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review presents an evidence-based approach to airway and patient management during endotracheal intubation in challenging cases commonly encountered in the emergency department.

DISCUSSION

Adverse events during emergent airway management are common with postintubation cardiac arrest, reported in as many as 1 in 25 intubations. Many of these adverse events can be avoided by proper identification and understanding the underlying physiology, preparation, and postintubation management. Those with high-risk features including trauma, elevated intracranial pressure, upper gastrointestinal bleed, cardiac tamponade, aortic stenosis, morbid obesity, and pregnancy must be managed with airway expertise.

CONCLUSIONS

This narrative review discusses the pearls and pitfalls of commonly encountered physiologic high-risk intubations with a focus on the emergency clinician.