Comparative effects of long-acting beta2-agonists, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor on exercise-induced asthma

Emerging Roles and Therapeutic Applications of Arachidonic Acid Pathways in Cardiometabolic Diseases

Cardiometabolic disease has become a major health burden worldwide, with sharply increasing prevalence but highly limited therapeutic interventions. Emerging evidence has revealed that arachidonic acid derivatives and pathway factors link metabolic disorders to cardiovascular risks and intimately participate in the progression and severity of cardiometabolic diseases. In this review, we systemically summarized and updated the biological functions of arachidonic acid pathways in cardiometabolic diseases, mainly focusing on heart failure, hypertension, atherosclerosis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity, and diabetes. We further discussed the cellular and molecular mechanisms of arachidonic acid pathway-mediated regulation of cardiometabolic diseases and highlighted the emerging clinical advances to improve these pathological conditions by targeting arachidonic acid metabolites and pathway factors.

Pharmacologic Strategies for Exercise-Induced Bronchospasm with a Focus on Athletes

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is the transient narrowing of the airways during and after exercise that occurs in response to increased ventilation in susceptible individuals. It occurs across the age spectrum in patients with underlying asthma and can occur in athletes without baseline asthma. The inflammatory mechanisms underlying EIB in patients without asthma may be distinct from those underlying EIB in patients with asthma. This review summarizes mechanistic and clinical data that can guide the choice of chronic and acute pharmacologic therapies targeting control of EIB. Relevant regulations from the World Anti-Doping Agency are also discussed.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction update-2016

The first practice parameter on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) was published in 2010. This updated practice parameter was prepared 5 years later. In the ensuing years, there has been increased understanding of the pathogenesis of EIB and improved diagnosis of this disorder by using objective testing. At the time of this publication, observations included the following: dry powder mannitol for inhalation as a bronchial provocation test is FDA approved however not currently available in the United States; if baseline pulmonary function test results are normal to near normal (before and after bronchodilator) in a person with suspected EIB, then further testing should be performed by using standardized exercise challenge or eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH); and the efficacy of nonpharmaceutical interventions (omega-3 fatty acids) has been challenged. The workgroup preparing this practice parameter updated contemporary practice guidelines based on a current systematic literature review. The group obtained supplementary literature and consensus expert opinions when the published literature was insufficient. A search of the medical literature on PubMed was conducted, and search terms included pathogenesis, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and therapy (both pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical) of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction or exercise-induced asthma (which is no longer a preferred term); asthma; and exercise and asthma. References assessed as relevant to the topic were evaluated to search for additional relevant references. Published clinical studies were appraised by category of evidence and used to document the strength of the recommendation. The parameter was then evaluated by Joint Task Force reviewers and then by reviewers assigned by the parent organizations, as well as the general membership. Based on this process, the parameter can be characterized as an evidence- and consensus-based document.

Can a single dose response predict the effect of montelukast on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction?

RATIONALE

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) can be prevented by a single dose of montelukast (MLK). The effect is variable, similar to the variable responsiveness observed after daily treatment with MLK. We hypothesized that the effect of a single MLK-dose (5 or 10 mg) on EIB could predict the clinical effectiveness of longer term once daily treatment.

METHODS

This was a prospective, open-label study. Twenty-four asthmatic adolescents (12-17 years) suboptimally controlled by low-dose inhaled corticosteroids, with ≥10% post-exercise fall in FEV1 , were included. They performed an exercise test at baseline, 20 hr after a single MLK-dose and 40-44 hr after the last dose of 4 weeks once daily treatment. The correlations between the effect of a single dose and 4 weeks treatment on area under the curve (AUC) and maximum % fall in FEV1 were calculated.

RESULTS

AUC0-20 min decreased significantly after a single MLK-dose (P = 0.001, CI: 64.9-218.2), but not after 4 weeks of treatment (P = 0.080, CI: -12.2 to 200.4). There was a moderate correlation between the effect of a single MLK-dose and 4 weeks treatment on AUC0-20 min , r = 0.49 (P = 0.011), and maximum % fall in FEV1 , r = 0.40 (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

The protection provided by a single MLK-dose against EIB only modestly predicts the effect of regular treatment against EIB in adolescent asthmatics on low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. If used on a daily base, MLK offered clinically significant protection against EIB in two thirds of adolescents suboptimally controlled by low-dose ICS.

'Indirect' challenges from science to clinical practice

Indirect challenges act to provoke bronchoconstriction by causing the release of endogenous mediators and are used to identify airway hyper-responsiveness. This paper reviews the historical development of challenges, with exercise, eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea (EVH) of dry air, wet hypertonic saline, and with dry powder mannitol, that preceded their use in clinical practice. The first challenge developed for clinical use was exercise. Physicians were keen for a standardized test to identify exercise-induced asthma (EIA) and to assess the effect of drugs such as disodium cromoglycate. EVH with dry air became a surrogate for exercise to increase ventilation to very high levels. A simple test was developed with EVH and used to identify EIA in defence force recruits and later in elite athletes. The research findings with different conditions of inspired air led to the conclusion that loss of water by evaporation from the airway surface was the stimulus to EIA. The proposal that water loss caused a transient increase in osmolarity led to the development of the hypertonic saline challenge. The wet aerosol challenge with 4.5% saline, provided a known osmotic stimulus, to which most asthmatics were sensitive. To simplify the osmotic challenge, a dry powder of mannitol was specially prepared and encapsulated. The test pack with different doses and an inhaler provided a common operating procedure that could be used at the point of care. All these challenge tests have a high specificity to identify currently active asthma. All have been used to assess the benefit of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Over the 50 years, the methods for testing became safer, less complex, and less expensive and all used forced expiratory volume in 1 sec to measure the response. Thus, they became practical to use routinely and were recommended in guidelines for use in clinical practice.

Beta₂-agonists for exercise-induced asthma

BACKGROUND

It is well known that physical exercise can trigger asthma symptoms and can induce bronchial obstruction in people without clinical asthma. International guidelines on asthma management recommend the use of beta2-agonists at any stage of the disease. At present, however, no consensus has been reached about the efficacy and safety of beta2-agonists in the pretreatment of exercise-induced asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. For the purpose of the present review, both of these conditions are referred to by the acronymous EIA, independently from the presence of an underlying chronic clinical disease.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of inhaled short- and long-acting beta2-agonists, compared with placebo, in the pretreatment of children and adults with exercise-induced asthma (or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction).

SEARCH METHODS

Trials were identified by electronic searching of the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of Trials and by handsearching of respiratory journals and meetings. Searches are current as of August 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of any study design, published in full text, that assessed the effects of inhaled beta2-agonists on EIA in adults and children. We excluded studies that did not clearly state diagnostic criteria for EIA.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures as expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 53 trials consisting of 1139 participants. Forty-eight studies used a cross-over design, and five were performed in accordance with a parallel-group design. Forty-five studies addressed the effect of a single beta2-agonist administration, and eight focused on long-term treatment. We addressed these two different intervention regimens as different comparisons.Among primary outcomes for short-term administration, data on maximum fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) showed a significant protective effect for both short-acting beta-agonists (SABA) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) compared with placebo, with a mean difference of -17.67% (95% confidence interval (CI) -19.51% to -15.84%, P = 0.00001, 799 participants from 72 studies). The subgroup analysis of studies performed in adults compared with those performed in children showed high heterogeneity confined to children, despite the comparable mean bronchoprotective effect.Secondary outcomes on other pulmonary function parameters confirmed a more positive and protective effect of beta2-agonists on EIA compared with placebo. Occurrence of side effects was not significantly different between beta2-agonists and placebo.Overall evaluation of the included long-term studies suggests a beta2-agonist bronchoprotective effect for the first dose of treatment. However, long-term use of both SABA and LABA induced the onset of tolerance and decreased the duration of drug effect, even after a short treatment period.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence of low to moderate quality shows that beta2-agonists, both SABA and LABA, when administered in a single dose, are effective and safe in preventing EIA.Long-term regular administration of inhaled beta2-agonists induces tolerance and lacks sufficient safety data. This finding appears to be of particular clinical relevance in view of the potential for prolonged regular use of beta2-agonists as monotherapy in the pretreatment of EIA, despite the warnings of drug agencies (FDA, EMA) regarding LABA.

A randomized, comparative, multicentric clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of zileuton extended-release tablets with montelukast sodium tablets in patients suffering from chronic persistent asthma

Leukotriene (LT) modifiers are anti-inflammatory drugs that are useful as an add-on therapy with first-line asthma-controller medications. This group includes LT synthesis inhibitors (eg, Zileuton) and receptor antagonists (eg, Montelukast), whose direct comparative clinical data are not available. This study was conducted to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of orally administered Zileuton extended-release (ER) with Montelukast sodium in patients suffering from chronic persistent asthma. Patients of 18-65 years of age with mild to moderate chronic stable asthma were randomized to treatment with Zileuton ER 2400 mg/d or Montelukast 10 mg/d for 12 weeks. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and asthma symptoms (cough, wheeze, chest tightness, and shortness of breath each on a 4-point scale) were assessed on monthly scheduled out-patient visits. Safety assessments by clinical and laboratory parameters were carried out during the course of the study. Among 210 patients eligible for efficacy assessment, PEFR improved by 64.8 ± 52.8 (95% confidence interval: 54.8-74.7) L/min with Zileuton ER (n = 109) and 40.6 ± 47.5 (31.3-49.9) L/min with Montelukast (n = 101; P < 0.001), whereas percent improvements were 27.0% (22.6%-31.5%) versus 18.4% (14.1%-22.7%), respectively (P = 0.006). Zileuton ER lead to ≥12% PEFR improvements in 74 of 109 [67.9% (59.1%-76.7%)] patients, whereas the same was noted in 52 of 101 [51.5% (41.7%-61.2%)] patients receiving Montelukast (P = 0.015). The reduction in the mean overall symptom intensity score was also significantly better with Zileuton ER [-5.0 ± 2.1 (4.6-5.4) versus -4.2 ± 2.3 (3.8-4.7)] (P = 0.018); however, the same was not observed for the decline in the individual symptom scores. A lesser but not significantly different adverse event rate was reported in the Zileuton ER group than the Montelukast group with the commonest events being headache and gastrointestinal effects in both the groups. Thus, Zileuton ER seems to be more efficacious than Montelukast and well tolerated for the treatment of mild to moderate chronic persistent asthma in adult patient population. Further studies can elucidate the comparative treatment benefits of these LT modifiers in asthma management.

Pharmacotherapy for exercise-induced asthma: allowing normal levels of activity and sport

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is experienced by the majority of an estimated 300 million individuals who have asthma, a condition that affects all ages and is increasing globally. Respiratory water loss with dehydration of the airways causing mediator release and airway narrowing is considered the cause of EIB, the severity of which will be increased if the inhaled air is cold or polluted. Adequate control of asthma is essential to minimize or prevent EIB and permit normal levels of physical activity and sport. This is important because exercise is a necessary component of daily living, assists in obtaining and maintaining a healthy body and has been demonstrated to benefit asthmatics. Inhaled glucocorticosteroids and inhaled β(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (IβA) are the pharmacological agents of choice to manage asthma and minimize EIB, assisted when necessary, by other drugs including leukotriene receptor antagonists and chromones. Tolerance from daily use of IβA is of concern and more flexible drug therapy needs to be considered. Optimal use of inhalers to deliver drugs effectively requires closer attention. Pharmacogenetics may hold the key to future drug therapy.

Pulmonary disorders in athletes

Exercise is rarely limited by pulmonary causes in normal individuals. Cardiac output and peripheral muscle disease are usually the limiting factors. Although minute ventilation rises steeply during exercise, normal individuals maintain a substantial breathing reserve. Exercise in patients, however, can be limited by pulmonary disorders. Acute pulmonary causes (exercise-induced bronchospasm, vocal cord dysfunction, exercise-induced anaphylaxis, and exercise-induced urticaria) or chronic disorders (obstructive and restrictive lung disorders) reduce exercise tolerance. Exercise testing has proved the mainstay for diagnosis and treatment of these disorders.

Mast cell modulation of the vascular and lymphatic endothelium

Mast cells (MCs) promote a wide range of localized and systemic inflammatory responses. Their involvement in immediate as well as chronic inflammatory reactions at both local and distal sites points to an extraordinarily powerful immunoregulatory capacity with spatial and temporal versatility. MCs are preferentially found in close proximity to both vascular and lymphatic vessels. On activation, they undergo a biphasic secretory response involving the rapid release of prestored vasoactive mediators followed by de novo synthesized products. Many actions of MCs are related to their capacity to regulate vascular flow and permeability and to the recruitment of various inflammatory cells from the vasculature into inflammatory sites. These mediators often work in an additive fashion and achieve their inflammatory effects locally by directly acting on the vascular and lymphatic endothelia, but they also can affect distal sites. Along these lines, the lymphatic and endothelial vasculatures of the host act as a conduit for the dissemination of MC signals during inflammation. The central role of the MC-endothelial cell axis to immune homeostasis is emphasized by the fact that some of the most effective current treatments for inflammatory disorders are directed at interfering with this interaction.

Time-effect of montelukast on protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

INTRODUCTION

Montelukast has been proven to assure a protective effect against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

AIM

To verify exactly when montelukast begins protection in asthmatic children by evaluating different time intervals between dosing and challenge.

METHODS

In a double blind, placebo-controlled, three day doses, crossover study, patients were randomized to receive in sequence treatment with either a placebo or montelukast and assigned to one of seven groups that were tested 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8 h after drug administration, respectively. For each group, the exercise challenge was always performed at the same hour on the first and third days of treatment.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine asthmatic children took part in the study. On day 3, the mean FEV(1) % fall from baseline was 25.54 (95% CI = 21.63/29.46) and 14.89 (95% CI = 11.85/17.92) for the placebo and active drug (p < 0.05), respectively. On day 1, the mean fall of FEV(1) was 28.20 (95% CI = 24.46/31.94) and 19.01 (95% CI = 15.71/22.31) for the placebo and montelukast (p < 0.05), respectively. Clinical protection was achieved in 21 (30%) and 33 (48%) subjects by montelukast on the first and third days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Montelukast assured protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction from the first through the eighth hour from the first day of treatment. However, individual susceptibility to protection was evident since some individuals were not protected at any time. We conclude that in clinical use individual responses to the drug should be carefully evaluated in the follow-up management.

[Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in non-asthmatic athletes]

INTRODUCTION

A new clinical entity, exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), has been recently defined which describes bronchoconstriction occurring in association with exercise in susceptible non-asthmatic persons.

STATE OF ART

There is considerable evidence that the pathogenesis of this condition is related to airway injury, due to prolonged hyperventilation and aggressive environmental factors. If the objective diagnostic tests are identical for the diagnosis of exercise induced asthma and EIB, the diagnoses are established differently, according to the high sensitivity of provocation by exercise "in the field" or the eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation provocation test.

PERSPECTIVES

Current pharmacological treatment is based upon the inhalation of ß2-agonists prior to exercise, but to be granted permission to use them, athletes are required to provide documentation of objective evidence of EIB. Therefore, the diagnostic pathway in athletes is essential and respiratory physicians need to know the specific features of this new clinical entity.

CONCLUSIONS

EIB distinct from the presence of asthma is prevalent in elite athletes and its determinants should be well known by their health care providers to assure an optimal management of this peculiar disease, in respect to drug doping regulations.

Effect of montelukast or salmeterol added to inhaled fluticasone on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of montelukast, 5 mg, or inhaled salmeterol, 50 microg, added to inhaled fluticasone in reducing the maximum percentage decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) after a standardized exercise challenge and response to rescue bronchodilation with albuterol in children aged 6 to 14 years with persistent asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB).

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, 2-period, 4-week, crossover study conducted between December 22, 2005 and November 14, 2008 at 30 centers in Europe, Asia, Mexico, and South America. Patients with asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroids demonstrated an FEV1 of 70% or higher of the predicted value and EIB (defined as a decrease in FEV1 > or = 15% compared with preexercise baseline FEV1 on 2 occasions before randomization). Standardized exercise challenges were performed at baseline (prerandomization) and at the end of each active treatment period.

RESULTS

Of 154 patients randomized, 145 completed the study. Montelukast, compared with salmeterol, significantly reduced the mean maximum percentage decrease in FEV1 (10.6% vs 13.8%; P = .009), mean area under the curve for the first 20 minutes after exercise (116.0% x min vs 168.8% x min; P = .006), and median time to recovery (6.0 vs 11.1 minutes; P = .04). Response to albuterol rescue after exercise challenge was significantly greater (P < .001) with montelukast. Montelukast and salmeterol were generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Attenuation and response of EIB to albuterol rescue after exercise challenge were significantly better with montelukast than with salmeterol after 4 weeks of treatment.

Exercise-induced asthma in children

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction affects 40-90% of people with asthma, compared with 3-15% of the general population. Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) is diagnosed on the basis of subjective symptoms of airflow obstruction during and after exercise, objective measures of airflow obstruction and the exclusion of alternative diagnoses. Although the pathogenesis of EIA has not been fully elucidated, two major theories have been proposed: the airway rewarming theory and the hyperosmolarity theory. Increasing evidence suggests that airway inflammation plays a major role in the pathogenesis of EIA. In this article, we review the prevalence, pathogenesis, methods for diagnosis and treatment of EIA, as well as the responsiveness of children and adolescents to EIA therapies.

Exercise-induced wheeze: Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide-directed management

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Exercise-induced wheeze (EIW) is common. Several treatment options exist. Patients with low fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (F(E)NO) are unlikely to be steroid-responsive and might benefit from non-steroidal therapies. We assessed: the efficacy of cromoglycate, formoterol and montelukast in patients with EIW and low F(E)NO (<35 ppb) in a randomized cross-over trial, and the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroid in a high F(E)NO (>35 ppb) group.

METHODS

Patients had EIW and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to mannitol and/or exercise. Those with low F(E)NO (n = 19) received cromoglycate (20 mg inh. bd + before challenge tests), formoterol (12 microg inh. bd + before challenge tests) and montelukast (10 mg p.o. od), each for 2 weeks. Those with high F(E)NO (n = 20) took inhaled fluticasone (500 microg) daily for 4 weeks. Primary end-points were: 50% reduction in maximum FEV(1) %fall (clinical protection) and decrease in AHR to mannitol.

RESULTS

In patients with low F(E)NO, cromoglycate, formoterol and montelukast significantly decreased AHR to mannitol in 63%, 61% and 47% of patients, respectively. In this group, the magnitude of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) was significantly reduced with montelukast and formoterol; between-treatment differences were not significant. Of 6/19 with low F(E)NO and EIB, protection occurred in 67% (cromoglycate), 83% (formoterol) and 50% (montelukast), respectively. In the high F(E)NO group, AHR to mannitol and EIB decreased significantly with fluticasone (P < 0.001, P = 0.005, respectively), and protection occurred in 7/8 (88%) with EIB.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with EIW and low F(E)NO, the number of 'responders' to cromoglycate, formoterol and montelukast was similar. In a high F(E)NO population the response to inhaled corticosteroid was highly significant and comparable to previous studies.

Section 2. Exercise-Induced Bronchospasm: Albuterol versus Montelukast: Highlights of the Asthma Summit 2009: Beyond the Guidelines

Exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) involves airway obstruction with an onset shortly after exercising. It can occur in individuals without a diagnosis of asthma, but is most common in asthmatic patients (and in this scenario may be referred to as exercise-induced asthma, EIA), correlating with the patient's degree of airway hyperreactivity. While albuterol is the most commonly used rescue and prophylactic medication for EIB, the leukotriene antagonist, monetlukast, may be an appropriate choice for some patients. Clinical data have shown that once-daily treatment with montelukast (5 or 10 mg tablet) can offer protection against EIB within 3 days for some patients. Such an approach might be preferred for patients who have difficulty with inhaled medications and for children who cannot access their inhalers during the school day. Montelukast also may be an option to reduce side effects associated with albuterol for individuals who exercise regularly.

Exercise-induced asthma: critical analysis of the protective role of montelukast

Exercise-induced asthma/exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIA/EIB) is a prevalent and clinically important disease affecting young children through older adulthood. These terms are often used interchangeably and the differences are not clearly defined in the literature. The pathogenesis of EIA/EIB may be different in those with persistent asthma compared to those with exercise-induced symptoms only. The natural history of EIA is unclear and may be different for elite athletes. Leukotriene biology has helped the understanding of EIB. The type and intensity of exercise are important factors for EIB. Exercise participation is necessary for proper development and control of EIA is recommended. Symptoms of EIB should be confirmed by proper testing. Biologic markers may also be helpful in diagnosis. Not all exercise symptoms are from EIB. Many medication and nonpharmacologic treatments are available. Asthma education is an important component of managing EIA. Many medications have been tested and the comparisons are complicated. Montelukast is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved asthma and EIB controller and has a number of potential advantages to other asthma medications including short onset of action, ease of use, and lack of tolerance. Not all patients improve with montelukast and rescue medication should be available.

Role of leukotrienes in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) refers to acute airflow obstruction that is triggered by a period of physical exertion. EIB occurs mainly in individuals with other features of asthma but is especially prominent in a subset of asthmatics with pronounced indirect airway hyperresponsiveness. Leukotrienes (LTs) play a critical role in the pathophysiology of EIB. Asthmatics who are susceptible to EIB have increased levels of cysteinyl LTs (cysLTs [ie, LTs C4, D4, and E4]) in induced sputum and exhaled breath condensate. Exercise challenge in individuals susceptible to this disorder initiates the sustained increase in cysLTs in the airways and an increase in the ratio of cysLTs to prostaglandin E(2). The effects of cysLTs leading to secreted mucin release and smooth muscle constriction may be mediated in part through activation of sensory nerves. Therapies that block cysLT production or the cysLT(1) receptor effectively reduce the severity of EIB.

Association of IL-13 polymorphisms with leukotriene receptor antagonist drug responsiveness in Korean children with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

BACKGROUND

IL-13 is a pivotal cytokine in allergic inflammation and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and is known to influence leukotriene levels.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether IL-13 polymorphisms may be associated with clinical phenotypes and drug responsiveness to the leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) in Korean asthmatic children with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB).

METHODS

We enrolled 242 normal controls and 374 patients with asthma. Of the asthmatic patients, 100 performed exercise challenge tests before and after receiving montelukast (5 mg/day) for 8 weeks and included 80 subjects in drug responsiveness analysis. We assessed IL-13 polymorphisms (-1512A/C, -1112C/T, +2044G/A) through PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

RESULTS

Significantly higher total IgE levels and maximum percent fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (%) after exercise challenge test were found in asthmatic patients carrying one or two copies of the IL-13 +2044A versus those homozygous for +2044G (P=0.011 and 0.040, respectively). We further noted a correlation of total IgE with maximum percent fall in FEV1 (%) in asthmatic patients, as well as a reverse correlation with improvement of maximum percent fall in FEV1 (%) after exercise challenge tests. Finally, we observed a significant association between responsiveness to montelukast and IL-13 -1112C/T polymorphism and the haplotype of IL-13 polymorphisms.

CONCLUSION

The IL-13 +2044G/A polymorphism may be associated with atopy and EIB severity in Korean children with EIB, and thus could potentially be considered as a disease-modifying gene. Moreover, the IL-13 -1112C/T polymorphism and the haplotype of IL-13 polymorphisms seem to be associated with LTRA drug responsiveness, and thus might prove useful as a target for modulation of LTRA drug responsiveness.

Airway injury as a mechanism for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in elite athletes

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a consequence of evaporative water loss in conditioning the inspired air. The water loss causes cooling and dehydration of the airway surface. One acute effect of dehydration is the release of mediators, such as prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and histamine, that can stimulate smooth muscle, causing contraction and a change in vascular permeability. Inspiring cold air increases dehydration of the surface area and causes changes in bronchial blood flow. This article proposes that the pathogenesis of EIB in elite athletes relates to the epithelial injury arising from breathing poorly conditioned air at high flows for long periods of time or high volumes of irritant particles or gases. The evidence to support this proposal comes from many markers of injury. The restorative process after injury involves plasma exudation and movement of cells into the airways, a process repeated many times during a season of training. This process has the potential to expose smooth muscle to a wide variety of plasma- and cell-derived substances. The exposure to these substances over time can lead to an alteration in the contractile properties of the smooth muscle, making it more sensitive to mediators of bronchoconstriction. It is proposed that cold-weather athletes have airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to pharmacologic agents as a result of epithelial injury. In those who are allergic, AHR can also be expressed as EIB. The role of beta(2)-receptor agonists in inhibiting and enhancing the development of AHR and EIB is discussed.

Pretreatment with albuterol versus montelukast for exercise-induced bronchospasm in children

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To compare pretreatment with albuterol versus montelukast added to the current asthma regimen for protection against exercise-induced bronchospasm in children with mild-to-moderate asthma, and to determine whether cysteinyl leukotriene (Cys-LT) concentrations measured in the exhaled breath condensate correlated with response to montelukast.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study.

SETTING

Asthma clinic at a university-affiliated medical center.

PATIENTS

Eleven children aged 7-17 years with physician-diagnosed mild-to-moderate asthma for at least 6 months and with self-reported exercise-induced bronchospasm (defined as > or = 15% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [FEV(1)] at screening and baseline visit).

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomly assigned to receive 3-7 days of oral montelukast 5-10 mg/day or 2 puffs of an albuterol metered-dose inhaler just before an exercise challenge and then were crossed over to the alternate therapy for the last visit.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Serial spirometry was performed before and at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after the exercise challenge at each visit. Measurement of exhaled breath condensate was performed at the screening visit and study visits 1 and 2. The primary outcome was the maximum change in FEV(1) after exercise. Secondary outcomes were the area under the curve for FEV(1) (expressed as percentage decrease from baseline) during the first 60 minutes (AUC(0-60)) after exercise and the proportion of patients in whom exercise-induced bronchospasm was prevented (defined as < 15% decrease in FEV(1) after exercise challenge). The mean +/- SD maximum decrease in FEV(1) was 27.5 +/- 7.9% at baseline. Patients receiving montelukast had an 18.3 +/- 13.7% decrease in FEV(1) compared with 0.7 +/- 1.6% in patients receiving albuterol (p=0.002, paired t test). Exercise-induced bronchospasm was prevented in 100% of the patients receiving albuterol compared with 55% receiving montelukast (p<0.05, McNemar's test). The AUC(0-60) was significantly smaller with albuterol compared with montelukast (p<0.001, Wilcoxon signed rank test). No correlations were found between Cys-LT concentration and the severity of exercise-induced bronchospasm or the response to montelukast.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment with albuterol is more effective than montelukast for prevention of exercise-induced bronchospasm in children with asthma.

Single-Dose Montelukast or Salmeterol as Protection Against Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

It has been previously established that montelukast provides protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) after a single dose. The present objective was to assess the onset and duration of this protective action in a trial that included both positive and negative controls.

METHODS

A randomized, active-controlled and placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, three-way crossover study was conducted in 47 patients (age range, 15 to 44 years) in whom there was a 20 to 40% fall in FEV(1) following exercise (DeltaFEV(1)). In randomized sequence, patients received oral montelukast (10 mg), placebo, or inhaled salmeterol (50 microg) as a positive control. Dosing was followed by exercise challenges at 2, 8.5, and 24 h. The primary end point was maximum DeltaFEV(1) at 2 h postdose. Secondary end points included maximum DeltaFEV(1) at the two later time points, and other measures (including recovery time and need for beta-agonist rescue) at all time points.

RESULTS

The maximum DeltaFEV(1) magnitudes at 2, 8.5, and 24 h were significantly smaller after montelukast administration than after placebo administration (least squares mean [+/- SE], 13.2 +/- 1.2%, 11.7 +/- 1.2%, and 10.0 +/- 1.1% vs 21.8 +/- 1.2%, 16.8 +/- 1.3%, and 14.0 +/- 1.1%, respectively; p <or= 0.001, < 0.01, and < 0.05). All secondary end point results supported the primary end point. Montelukast and salmeterol had similar efficacy at 2 and 8.5 h, but only montelukast was effective at 24 h.

CONCLUSION

Montelukast provided significant protection against EIB having an onset within 2 h following a single oral dose and lasting for at least 24 h.

Update on montelukast and its role in the treatment of asthma, allergic rhinitis and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Montelukast sodium (Singulair, Merck and Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ) is a selective and orally-active leukotriene receptor antagonist with demonstrated effectiveness for treating allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis in adults and children as young as 12 months of age for allergic asthma and 6 months of age for allergic rhinitis. It was recently approved in the US for prevention of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in patients who are > or = 15 years of age. This paper updates a prior review of the data on the clinical efficacy of montelukast published in this journal.

Cold air-provoked respiratory symptoms: the mechanisms and management

OBJECTIVES

To describe the mechanisms and management of cold air-provoked respiratory symptoms.

STUDY DESIGN

A literature review.

METHODS

The review includes human epidemiological studies, human and animal experimental studies, as well as human studies about management of the cold air-provoked respiratory symptoms.

RESULTS

Cold air is unlikely to be a causal factor initiating respiratory diseases but a symptom trigger. In the present review, the airway responses beyond these symptoms were divided into three types. The short-term responses are those that develop within minutes in response to sudden cooling of the airways. Subjects with asthma or rhinitis are especially prone to these responses. The long-term responses are those that develop in response to repeated and long-standing cooling and drying of the airways, usually in endurance athletes. Finally, there are the physiological, reflex-mediated lower-airway responses to cooling of the skin or upper airways.

CONCLUSIONS

The mechanisms beyond cold air-provoked respiratory symptoms vary considerably and mainly depend on the individual's susceptibility and the ventilation level during the cold exposure. An understanding of these mechanisms is essential for successful management of the symptoms.

Leukotriene synthesis inhibitors versus antagonists: the pros and cons

It has been recognized for many years that leukotrienes play an important role in mediating various effects of the allergic reaction. Recent evidence has shown that they play a role in other diseases. Leukotrienes can be separated into the fairly well-characterized cysteinyl leukotrienes and the less well-characterized leukotriene B(4). Effects of the leukotrienes are mediated through receptors that are expressed on a variety of cell types and can be modulated based on the inflammatory environment present. The pharmaceutical industry has long been interested in blocking leukotriene action. As such, two approaches have been developed that led to drugs approved for treating allergic disease. The most widely used class is the cysteinyl type 1 receptor antagonists, which block binding of the cysteinyl leukotrienes to the cell. The second class is an inhibitor of the 5-lipoxygenase enzyme that prevents synthesis of both the cysteinyl leukotrienes and leukotriene B(4). This review focuses on the role that leukotrienes play in various diseases, with the emphasis on allergic diseases, and considers the rationale for choosing either a leukotriene antagonist or synthesis inhibitor as a treatment option.

Protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction two hours after a single oral dose of montelukast

The objective of this double-blind cross-over study was to evaluate montelukast for the prevention of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Sixty-two patients with EIB (post-exercise decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) > or = 20% at pre-randomization) were randomized to montelukast 10 mg or placebo, followed by exercise-challenge 2, 12, and 24 hours postdose. The primary endpoint was the maximum percent-fall in FEV(1) (from pre-exercise FEV(1)) during 60 minutes after exercise-challenge at 2 hours postdose. This endpoint was improved after montelukast (mean +/- SD = 11.7% +/- 10.8) versus placebo (17.5% +/- 13.8) (p < or = 0.001); numerically greater improvements were seen at 12 hours and 24 hours. A quicker time to recovery after challenge (p < or = 0.001) and a smaller area under the curve for percent-fall in FEV(1) during 60 minutes after challenge (p < or = 0.01) were seen with montelukast at 2 hours. At this timepoint, more patients taking montelukast (45/54) than taking placebo (37/54) were protected against EIB (p = 0.039). We concluded that montelukast provided significant protection against EIB at 2 hours after a single dose.

Zileuton: clinical implications of 5-Lipoxygenase inhibition in severe airway disease

The 5-Lipoxygenase pathway results in the formation of leukotrienes, including leukotriene B(4) (LTB(4)), 5-oxo-6E,8Z,11Z,14Z-eicosatetranoic acid and the cysteinyl leukotrienes (LTC(4), LTD(4) and LTE(4)) and activates all four leukotriene receptors, BLT1, BLT2, cysLT(1) and cysLT(2). Zileuton is the only commercially available inhibitor of the 5-Lipoxygenase pathway. In a number of clinical trials, zileuton has been shown to improve airway function and inflammation, asthma symptom control and quality of life in asthmatics. Given the important role that leukotrienes play in airway inflammation, zileuton provides an additional therapeutic option in the management of chronic, persistent asthma, particularly those asthmatics with more severe disease. In addition, zileuton has shown promise in a number of other conditions, including upper airway inflammatory conditions, dermatological disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The development of new formulations, including a controlled release tablet formulation for b.i.d. dosing and an intravenous preparation for acute asthma exacerbations may enhance clinical utility and expand therapeutic indications.

Optimisation, validation and application of a capillary electrophoretic method for the determination of zafirlukast in pharmaceutical formulations

Zafirlukast is a selective and competitive orally administered inhibitor of the cysteinyl leukotrienes and currently indicated for the prophylaxis and treatment chronic asthma. A simple, rapid, reliable capillary zone electrophoresis method for the determination of ZAF in pharmaceutical formulations was developed and validated. The influence of buffer concentration, buffer pH, organic modifier, capillary temperature, applied voltage and injection time was systemically investigated in a fused silica capillary (i.d. 50 microm, total length 80.5 cm and effective length 72.0 cm). Optimum results were obtained with 50mM borate buffer at pH 8.50, capillary temperature 25 degrees C and applied voltage 30 kV. The samples were injected hydrodynamically for 3s at 50 mbar. Detection wavelength was set at 240 nm. Meloxicam was used as internal standard. The method was suitably validated with respect to linearity, limit of detection and quantification, accuracy, precision, selectivity, robustness and ruggedness. The linear calibration range was 2.00-80.00 microg mL(-1) and the limits of detection and quantification were 0.75 and 2.00 microg mL(-1) with R.S.D. of 3.88 and 2.75%, respectively. The proposed method was applied for the determination of ZAF in its pharmaceutical formulations. The results obtained from developed method were compared with a HPLC method reported in the literature and no significant difference was found statistically.

Onset and duration of protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by a single oral dose of montelukast

BACKGROUND

Leukotriene modifiers have been shown to protect against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) with repeated, chronic dosing.

OBJECTIVE

To study the onset and duration of protection against EIB after a single dose of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist.

METHODS

In this randomized, crossover, double-blind study, 51 adult asthma patients with EIB (> or = 20% postexercise decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]) received a single oral dose of montelukast (10 mg), or placebo followed by exercise challenge 2, 12, and 24 hours after dosing. The primary end point was maximum percentage decrease in FEV1 from preexercise baseline during 60 minutes after the 2-hour challenge.

RESULTS

At 2, 12, and 24 hours after dosing, the maximum decrease in FEV1 was 10.8% +/- 7.9%, 8.4% +/- 7.5%, and 8.3% +/- 7.3% for montelukast and 22.3% +/- 13.1%, 16.1% +/- 10.2%, and 16.9% +/- 11.7% for placebo, respectively (P < or = .001 at each time point). Postexercise recovery was quicker with montelukast than with placebo (P < or = .001); mean (95% confidence interval) differences were -26.8 minutes (-35.1 to -18.4 minutes), -16.0 minutes (-22.9 to -9.2 minutes), and -17.4 minutes (-24.9 to -9.9 minutes) at the 3 time points, respectively. At all time points, area under the curve for percentage decrease in FEV1 during 60 minutes after exercise was smaller after montelukast (P < or = .001); montelukast protected more patients against EIB (P < or = .001). Fewer patients required postexercise beta-agonist rescue at 2 hours after dosing with montelukast (P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Montelukast provided significant protection against EIB as soon as 2 hours after a single oral dose, with persistent benefit up to 24 hours.

Asthma and athletes: therapy to compete

Asthma presents special challenges to both the athletes who have it and to their health care providers. This article briefly reviews the problem of asthma--especially exercise-induced asthma--in the competitive athlete, and then describes treatments that are effective in controlling asthma. Drug-doping regulations are explained, as is the worldwide impact of drug doping on competitive athletes who have asthma. This review concludes with recommendations for competitive athletes and their health care providers regarding how to deal with asthma in this patient population.

New anti-inflammatory therapies and targets for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are diseases of the airways with an underlying inflammatory component. The prevalence and healthcare burden of asthma and COPD is still rising and is predicted to continue to rise in the foreseeable future. Beta-agonists and corticosteroids form the basis of the therapies available to treat asthma. However, the treatments available for COPD, corticosteroids and anticholinergics, reduce the number and severity of exacerbations, but have a limited effect on slowing the progression of the disease. The inflammatory processes underlying the pathology of asthma have received a great deal of attention and more recently, those underlying COPD have begun to be elucidated. This has resulted in the identification of new targets that will allow the development of novel approaches by the pharmaceutical industry, which will be able to focus its efforts in an attempt to provide new and improved therapies to treat these debilitating diseases. The resultant therapies should impinge on the underlying development of these diseases rather than providing symptomatic relief or palliative treatment alone. This review will outline new targets and novel approaches currently under investigation, which may provide opportunities for novel anti-inflammatory therapeutic interventions that slow or halt disease progression in asthma and COPD.

Identifying exercise-induced bronchospasm: treatment hinges on distinguishing it from chronic asthma

Exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) is an often-undiagnosed but common problem affecting both recreational and elite athletes. Although exercise can trigger exacerbation of chronic asthma, EIB should not be confused with the chronic inflammatory disease. In this article, Drs Hermansen and Kirchner review the incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of EIB and explain how to distinguish EIB from chronic asthma.

Control of asthma under specialist care: is it achieved?

BACKGROUND

The goal of asthma treatment is control of asthma and good quality of life for asthmatic patients; however, many asthmatic patients experience symptoms and limitations.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To examine treatment outcome in asthmatic patients under specialist care.

DESIGN

Multicenter, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Four large outpatient asthma clinics in teaching hospitals in three Greek cities.

PATIENTS

Three hundred seventy-eight randomly selected patients with mild or moderate asthma (265 female patients; mean age, 42.3 years).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Patients completed a questionnaire structured with eight domains covering patient characteristics, drug use at baseline and during exacerbations, regular follow-up, emergency visits, asthma control, symptoms, and limitations. Results show that the majority of patients have symptoms and limitations in their physical and social activities and have frequent exacerbations, while > 40% of patients think that their asthma is not well controlled. Most of our patients receive preventive medication (primarily inhaled corticosteroids, but less so long-acting beta2-agonists [LABAs] and leukotriene antagonists), increase their use of medication in case of exacerbations and have regular follow-up. However, the report shows that 48% of patients tried to reduce their medication dose, a fact implying that compliance is not always good.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that the goals of asthma treatment are not achieved, even under specialist care. Perhaps more effort should be invested in patient education while an increase in the use of LABAs and leukotriene antagonists, medications that have been shown to prevent exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and improve quality of life, may help better asthma outcomes.

Role of leukotriene receptor antagonists in the treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: a review

Asthma is a very common disorder that still causes significant morbidity and mortality. A high percentage of individuals with asthma also experience exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). This article reviews the current literature and updates the reader on the safety, efficacy, and clinical applications of leukotriene modifiers in the treatment of EIB.

Bronchoprotective Effects of Single Doses of Salmeterol Combined With Montelukast in Thermally Induced Bronchospasm

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Salmeterol (S) and montelukast (M) individually inhibit the obstructive consequences of thermal stimuli such as exercise and hyperventilation (HV), but there is no information on whether these drugs can interact positively.

DESIGN

Randomized trial.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Atopic asthmatic patients with sensitivity to thermal provocations.

INTERVENTIONS

Eleven asthmatic patients generated stimulus-response curves to isocapnic HV while breathing frigid air without any interventions and then after pretreatment with 42 mug of S, 10 mg of M, and the combination. The order of testing was randomly determined.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Minute ventilation (Ve) was increased in 20-L increments until FEV(1) fell >or= 15%. Measurements were obtained before and 1 h after drug administration, and then again 5 min after each bout of HV. In the nonintervention trial, the provocation commenced after the patients presented to the laboratory. In the control challenge, the mean (+/- SEM) FEV(1) decreased 24.6 +/- 1.7% from baseline. S and M both increased the mean prechallenge FEV(1) significantly (S, 10.4 +/- 1.7% [p < 0.01]; M, 4.1 +/- 1.3% [p = 0.02]; S + M, p = 0.01). The combination of S + M produced greater bronchodilatation (mean improvement, 12.4 +/- 2.3%) than M alone (p = 0.004), but not greater than S alone (p = 0.80). Both drugs blunted the obstructive response similarly (protection: M, 34.6 +/- 15.1%; S, 60 +/- 8.7%; p = 0.13). The benefits added arithmetically with the combined regimen (protection with S + M, 84.9 +/- 5.5%; p = 0.01 vs S alone; p = 0.003 vs M alone).

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that the concurrent administration of single standard doses of S and M appears to provide greater protection against thermal stimuli than does either drug alone. Further experimentation will be required to ascertain whether the combination will provide additional clinical benefits to patients over those of the single agents.

Single-dose agents in the prevention of exercise-induced asthma: a descriptive review

Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) refers to the transient narrowing of the airways that occurs after vigorous exercise in 50-60% of patients with asthma. The need to condition the air inspired during exercise causes water to be lost from the airway surface, and this is thought to cause the release of inflammatory mediators (histamine, leukotrienes, and prostaglandins) from mast cells. EIA is associated with airway inflammation and its severity is markedly reduced following treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Drugs that inhibit the release of mediators and drugs that inhibit their contractile effects are the most successful in inhibiting EIA. Single doses of short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists, given as aerosols immediately before exercise, are very effective in the majority of patients with asthma, providing about 80% protection for up to 2 hours. Long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) given in single doses can be effective for up to 12 hours when used intermittently, but tolerance to the protective effect occurs if they are taken daily. Drugs such as cromolyn sodium (sodium cromoglicate) and nedocromil given as aerosols are less effective than beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (beta(2)-agonists), providing 50-60% protection for only 1-2 hours, but they have some advantages. They do not induce tolerance, the aerosol dosage can be easily titrated for the individual, and the protective effect is immediate. Because they cause no significant adverse effects, multiple doses can be used in a day. Leukotriene receptor antagonists, such as montelukast and zafirlukast, are also used for the prevention of EIA and provide 50-60% protection for up to 24 hours when given as tablets. Tolerance to the protective effect does not develop with regular use. If breakthrough EIA occurs, a beta(2)-agonist can be used effectively for rescue medication. For those patients with more persistent symptoms, the use of a LABA in combination with an inhaled corticosteroid has raised a number of issues with respect to the choice of prophylactic treatment for EIA. The most important issue is the development of tolerance to the protective effect of a LABA such that extra treatment may be needed in the middle of a treatment period. Recommending extra doses of a beta(2)-agonist to control EIA is not advisable on the basis that multiple doses can enhance the severity of EIA, delay spontaneous recovery from bronchoconstriction, and enhance responses to other contractile stimuli. It is time to take into account the advantages and disadvantages of the different drugs available to prevent EIA and to recognize that there are some myths related to their use in EIA.

Asthma associated with exercise

Exercise is a potent stimulus to asthma. The diagnosis is not always straightforward, and health care providers should have a high index of suspicion. Treatment usually controls exercise-induced asthma but usually requires therapy tailored for each individual patient.

Prolonged effect of montelukast in asthmatic children with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Accumulating evidence shows that cysteinyl leukotrienes are the most important mediators in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). In contrast to several studies in adults, there are few long-term studies of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) in children with EIB. The aim of this study was to assess the prolonged clinical and bronchoprotective effects of montelukast in asthmatic children with EIB. We randomly assigned 64 asthmatic children with EIB. Forty subjects received montelukast (5 mg/day), and 24 subjects received placebo once daily for 8 weeks. Exercise challenge was performed before and after 8 weeks of treatment. Of the 40 patients in the montelukast group, 28 patients crossed over after 8 weeks. The response was measured as asthma symptom score, maximum percent fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) from pre-exercise baseline, and time to recovery of FEV(1) to within 10% of pre-exercise baseline (time to recovery). Following 8 weeks of treatment with montelukast, the montelukast group compared with placebo showed significant improvements in all endpoints, including asthma symptom score, maximum percent fall in FEV(1) after exercise, and time to recovery. In the cross-over group, even 8 weeks after stopping montelukast treatment, all endpoints were significantly and persistently improved. These results indicate that montelukast provides clinical protection from airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic children with EIB, and suggest that LTRAs may be useful for the long-term management of asthmatic children with EIB.

A comparison of the effects of oral montelukast and inhaled salmeterol on response to rescue bronchodilation after challenge

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of addition of montelukast or salmeterol to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on the response to rescue beta2-agonist use after exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

METHODS

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed at 16 centers in the United States. Patients with asthma (n = 122, ages 15-58) whose symptoms were uncontrolled on Low-dose inhaled fluticasone and who had a history of exercise-induced worsening of asthma were randomized to receive either montelukast (10 mg once daily), salmeterol (50microg twice daily), or placebo for 4 weeks. Standardized spirometry after exercise challenge and beta2-agonist rescue was performed at baseline, week 1 and 4.

RESULTS

Maximum achievable forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) percent predicted after rescue beta2-agonist improved in the montelukast (+1.5%) and placebo (+1.2%) groups at 4 weeks, but diminished in the salmeterol (-3.9%) group (P < 0.001). Although pre-exercise FEV1 was greatest with salmeterol (P = 0.10), patients taking montelukast had significantly greater protection from an exercise-induced decrease in FEV1 than those taking salmeterol (P < 0.001). Both the magnitude and rate of rescue bronchodilation were greater with montelukast compared with salmeterol (P < 0.001). Five minutes after rescue beta2-agonist, 92% of patients taking montelukast and 68% of those taking placebo had recovered to pre-exercise levels, whereas only 50% of those taking salmeterol had recovered to pre-exercise levels.

CONCLUSION

In patients whose asthma symptoms remain uncontrolled using ICS, addition of montelukast permits a greater and more rapid rescue bronchodilation with a short-acting beta2-agonist than addition of salmeterol and provides consistent and clinically meaningful protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

Therapeutic responses in asthma and COPD. Bronchodilators

The presence of acute reversibility to bronchodilators does not distinguish asthma from COPD. Patients with either condition can benefit from bronchodilators, and should be given a trial to assess their response. Some respond with a change in lung volume with less hyperinflation; others improve their forced inspiratory flow and become much more comfortable. The combination of long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) and inhaled steroids is useful in both conditions. While anticholinergics seem to yield the best results in COPD, some patients with asthma benefit from their use. Tiotropium may be the most effective agent as monotherapy in COPD, but the combination of an inhaled steroid and a LABA may produce similar results in improving lung function. Long-acting bronchodilators are effective agents as monotherapy in COPD, but in asthma should be combined with a controller medication. Short-acting beta-agonists should be used intermittently in asthma, but may be used regularly or combined with an anticholinergic in COPD. The roles of stereoisomers, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and type 4 phosphodiesterase inhibitors in asthma and COPD remain uncertain at this time.

Management of exercise-induced bronchospasm in children: the role of leukotriene antagonists

This review assesses the evidence on the efficacy of leukotriene antagonists in the management of exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) in children. Only two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover studies have examined the effect of leukotriene antagonists in EIB in a pediatric setting. All other studies, including those comparing leukotriene antagonists with other agents such as beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (beta(2)-agonists) and inhaled corticosteroids, primarily involve adult patients. In children, not receiving other asthma medication, leukotriene antagonists can offer statistically significant protection from EIB compared with placebo. However, protection is not complete, as a significant proportion of children will continue to experience a >15% reduction in FEV(1). None of the studies involved children treated concurrently with other asthma medications; therefore, comments on additive therapy cannot be made. Despite evidence from only a few studies, leukotriene antagonists are seen to be well tolerated, efficacious, and of benefit to some children. In addition, current management for EIB with short-acting beta(2)-agonists is less than ideal. It is therefore concluded that in children with EIB, leukotriene antagonists are indicated on a trial basis with individualized therapy and follow-up to evaluate treatment response.

Identifying exercise-induced bronchospasm. Treatment hinges on distinguishing it from chronic asthma

Exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) is an often-undiagnosed but common problem affecting both recreational and elite athletes. Although exercise can trigger exacerbation of chronic asthma, EIB should not be confused with the chronic inflammatory disease. In this article, Drs Hermansen and Kirchner review the incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of EIB and explain how to distinguish EIB from chronic asthma.

Recent advances in the management of asthma using leukotriene modifiers

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways that affects approximately 100 million people worldwide. In order to reduce symptoms, improve pulmonary function, and decrease morbidity, current treatment guidelines emphasize the importance of controlling the underlying inflammation in patients with asthma. Leukotrienes are leukocyte-generated lipid mediators that promote airway inflammation. Recognition of the importance of leukotrienes in the pathogenesis of asthma has led to the development of leukotriene modifiers, the first new class of drugs for the treatment of asthma to become available in 25 years. Controlled clinical trials with the four currently used leukotriene modifiers (montelukast, zafirlukast, and zileuton in the US and pranlukast in Japan) have established their efficacy in improving pulmonary function, reducing symptoms, decreasing night-time awakenings, and decreasing the need for rescue medications. They exert anti-inflammatory effects that attenuate cellular infiltration and bronchial hyperresponsiveness and complement the anti-inflammatory properties of inhaled corticosteroids. In patients with moderate and severe asthma, they permit tapering of the corticosteroid dose. In patients with exercise-induced asthma, leukotriene modifiers limit the decline in and quicken the recovery of pulmonary functions without the tolerance issues seen with chronic long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist use. In patients with aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid)-induced asthma, they improve pulmonary function and shift the dose response curve to the right, reducing the patient's response to aspirin. In patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, with or without concomitant asthma, they improve nasal, eye, and throat symptoms as well as quality of life. Leukotriene modifiers are generally safe and well tolerated with adverse effect profiles similar to that of placebo. The one safety issue raised with leukotriene modifiers, Churg-Strauss Syndrome, appears to be the unmasking of an already present syndrome that is manifested when the leukotriene modifiers permit corticosteroid doses to be reduced. Although current treatment guidelines recommend their use in patients with mild persistent asthma, these guidelines were developed just as leukotriene modifiers were coming to the market, before much of the clinical efficacy data were published. Because asthma is a heterogeneous disease, the different asthma phenotypes respond differently to therapies; consequently asthma therapy needs to be individualized. Leukotriene modifiers increase the therapeutic options for patients with asthma and, based on recent data, it is expected that future guidelines will describe expanded uses for these agents in clinical circumstances where these drugs are effective.

Azelastine inhibits secretion of IL-6, TNF-alpha and IL-8 as well as NF-kappaB activation and intracellular calcium ion levels in normal human mast cells

BACKGROUND

Mast cells are involved in allergic inflammation by secreting histamine, proteases and several cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and IL-8. Certain histamine-1 receptor antagonists, such as azelastine present in the ophthalmic solution Optivar, have been reported to inhibit histamine and tryptase secretion, but its effect on inflammatory cytokine release from normal human umbilical cord blood-derived cultured mast cells (hCBMC) are not well known.

METHODS

We investigated the effect of azelastine on the secretion of IL-6, TNF-alpha and IL-8 from hCBMC, as well as its possible mechanism of action. hCBMC sensitized with IgE were pretreated for 5 min with azelastine at 0.01, 0.1, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, or 60 microM of Optivar, before stimulation with anti-IgE for 6 h. Optivar vehicle without azelastine was used as control. Cytokines were measured by ELISA, intracellular calcium levels by calcium indicators confocal, and nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) by electromobility shift assay.

RESULTS

Stimulation with anti-IgE led to substantial secretion of IL-6, TNF-alpha and IL-8. Preincubation for 5 min resulted in almost maximal inhibition with 6 microM azelastine for TNF-alpha (80%), with 24 microM for IL-6 (83%) and 60 microM for IL-8 (99%); the vehicle solution at the same concentrations as Optivar had no effect. Stimulation with anti-IgE increased intracellular Ca2+ level and induced NF-kappaB expression in hCBMC, which was inhibited by 24 microM azelastine.

CONCLUSION

Azelastine inhibited hCBMC secretion of IL-6, TNF-alpha and IL-8, possibly by inhibiting intracellular Ca2+ ions and NF-kappaB activation. Azelastine may, therefore, be helpful in treating allergic inflammation.

Exercise-Induced Asthma: An Update

Exercise-induced asthma (E.I.A) affects 12–16% of the general population and most of the patients affected by extrinsic or intrinsic asthma. Surprisingly, also a high percentage of professional and Olympic athletes are affected, showing that E.I.A. does not impair physical activity, whereas endurance sports bear a higher risk than the others. The mast cell role, late asthmatic responses, diagnosis, therapy, theories and data about immunological parameters in sports are taken into consideration in this review.