Cochlear implants: Causes, effects and mitigation strategies for the foreign body response and inflammation

Cochlear implants provide effective auditory rehabilitation for patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. Recent advances in cochlear implant technology and surgical approaches have enabled a greater number of patients to benefit from this technology, including those with significant residual low frequency acoustic hearing. Nearly all cochleae implanted with a cochlear implant electrode array develop an inflammatory and fibrotic response. This tissue reaction can have deleterious consequences for implant function, residual acoustic hearing, and the development of the next generation of cochlear prosthetics. This article reviews the current understanding of the inflammatory/foreign body response (FBR) after cochlear implant surgery, its impact on clinical outcome, and therapeutic strategies to mitigate this response. Findings from both in human subjects and animal models across a variety of species are highlighted. Electrode array design, surgical techniques, implant materials, and the degree and type of electrical stimulation are some critical factors that affect the FBR and inflammation. Modification of these factors and various anti-inflammatory pharmacological interventions have been shown to mitigate the inflammatory/FBR response. Ongoing and future approaches that seek to limit surgical trauma and curb the FBR to the implanted biomaterials of the electrode array are discussed. A better understanding of the anatomical, cellular and molecular basis of the inflammatory/FBR response after cochlear implantation has the potential to improve the outcome of current cochlear implants and also facilitate the development of the next generation of neural prostheses.

Predictors of Fibrotic and Bone Tissue Formation With 3-D Reconstructions of Post-implantation Human Temporal Bones

HYPOTHESIS

Years of implantation, surgical insertion approach, and electrode length will impact the volume of new tissue formation secondary to cochlear implantation.

BACKGROUND

New tissue formation, fibrosis, and osteoneogenesis after cochlear implantation have been implicated in increasing impedance and affecting performance of the cochlear implant.

METHODS

3-D reconstructions of 15 archival human temporal bones from patients with a history of cochlear implantation (CI) were generated from H&E histopathologic slides to study factors which affect volume of tissue formation.

RESULTS

Years of implantation was a predictor of osteoneogenesis (r = 0.638, p-value = 0.011) and total new tissue formation (r = 0.588, p-value = 0.021), however not of fibrosis (r = 0.235, p-value = 0.399). Median total tissue formation differed between cochleostomy and round window insertions, 25.98 and 10.34%, respectively (Mann-Whitney U = 7, p = 0.018). No correlations were found between electrode length or angular insertion depth and total new tissue (p = 0.192, p = 0.35), osteoneogenesis (p = 0.193, p = 0.27), and fibrosis (p = 0.498, p = 0.83), respectively. However, the type II error for electrode length and angular insertion depth ranged from 0.73 to 0.90, largely due to small numbers of the shorter electrodes.

CONCLUSIONS

With numbers of cochlear implant recipients increasing worldwide, an understanding of how to minimize intracochlear changes from implantation is important. The present study demonstrates that increasing years of implantation and inserting electrodes via a cochleostomy compared with a round window approach are associated with significantly greater degree of new tissue volume formation. While previous studies have demonstrated increased intracochlear damage in the setting of translocation with longer electrodes, length, and angular insertion depth of CI electrodes were not associated with increased tissue formation.