Drug-induced cutaneous lupus erythematosus, a distinct syndrome that is frequently unrecognized

Drug-Induced Lupus Secondary to Ethosuximide in Association with Acute Tubulointerstitial Nephritis and Nephrotic Syndrome

Background. Drug-induced lupus (DIL) is an autoimmune phenomenon where the patient develops lupus-like symptoms after exposure to a long-term medication. Case Summary. Here we describe a 10-year-old female with absence seizures who developed a lupus-like syndrome after being on ethosuximide for three months. She presented with nephrotic syndrome (NS) and acute kidney injury. Four weeks prior to presentation, she had been prescribed a seven-day course of oral amoxicillin for submental swelling after dental extraction. Investigations showed high titer of antinuclear antibody (ANA) and anti-double stranded DNA, elevated serum IgE level, and positive Coombs' test, along with positive anti-histone antibodies. Renal biopsy showed features of acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN) and partial podocyte foot process effacement without evidence of lupus nephritis. The patient had an excellent response to the steroid therapy with remission within two weeks. The patient remained in remission for two months as evaluated during the most recent follow-up; the autoimmune antibodies and immunoglobulin E trended down. Ethosuximide has been reported to cause DIL, however its possible association with TIN has not been reported. Although amoxicillin could have caused the TIN and NS in this patient, a possible novel association of ethosuximide with this nephrotic-nephritic presentation (NNP) cannot be ruled out. Conclusions. A renal histology is important to determine the accurate etiology of NNP in patients with DIL. Further studies are necessary to determine any possible causal effect of ethosuximide with NNP.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus induced by drugs - novel insights

Introduction: There is a growing list of drugs implicated in inducing both subacute and chronic forms of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is important to recognize these drugs in order to quickly treat patients with drug induced disease.Areas covered: This paper reviews the current literature describing drugs implicated in causing cutaneous lupus erythematosus. A Pubmed search was used to compile a list of medications implicated up to August 2019. It reviews new classes of drugs identified as causing cutaneous lupus erythematosus, the pathophysiology of the disease process, and current recommendations for treatment of the disease.Expert opinion: Many drugs have been identified as inducing lupus, and many more continue to be described in new reports. Further research is needed to understand this phenomenon, which will aid in the diagnosis and treatment of affected patients.

Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Induced by Nifedipine

Background:

Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) has been reported to be associated with the use of several drugs, including thiazides, terbinafine, and, rarely, calcium channel blockers.

Objective:

A case of SCLE induced by nifedipine is presented.

Methods and Results:

A 48-year-old white woman developed a papulosquamous and annular eruption in sun-exposed areas during the summer. The patient was taking nifedipine for essential hypertension for four years. Serology showed the presence of antinuclear and anti-Ro/SSA as well as antihistone antibodies. Histopathologic and immunopathologic (granular IgM deposits at the dermoepidermal junction) findings confirmed the diagnosis of SCLE. Nifedipine discontinuation led to rapid improvement with almost complete resolution of skin lesions in one month in the absence of active treatment. Reduction of antinuclear, anti-Ro/SSA, and antihistone antibody levels was documented after six months.

Conclusion:

Nifedipine can cause SCLE after a long period of administration. Antihistone antibodies may be associated with drug-induced SCLE.

Drug-induced lupus: an update

Drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE) is a lupus-like illness that has been recognized as an entity under environmentally-induced lupus erythematosus, where other agents such as physical (ultra-violet irradiation), chemical (heavy metals, aromatic amines) and food products (alfalfa sprouts) have been implicated. DILE has been accepted as a side effect of therapy with over 80 drugs since its first description in association with sulfadiazine in 1945. The epidemiology and clinical course of SLE and DILE differ markedly and prognosis is generally favourable in the latter although occasional lifethreatening cases have been reported in the literature. Constant pharmacovigilance is crucial for prompt diagnosis and cessation of offending therapy offers the best outcome. This review discusses the clinical presentation, diagnosis of DILE as well as provides an update on postulated pathogenic mechanisms and an overview of implicated drugs.

Drug-induced lupus: Including anti-tumour necrosis factor and interferon induced

Drug-induced lupus erythematosus is defined as a syndrome with clinical and serological features similar to systemic lupus erythematosus that is temporally related to continuous drug exposure and which resolves after discontinuation of this drug. More than 90 drugs, including biological modulators such as tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors and interferons, have been identified as likely ‘culprits’. While there are no standard diagnostic criteria for drug-induced lupus erythematosus, guidelines that can help to distinguish drug-induced lupus erythematosus from systemic lupus erythematosus have been proposed and several different patterns of drug-induced lupus erythematosus are emerging. Distinguishing drug-induced lupus erythematosus from systemic lupus erythematosus is important because the prognosis of drug-induced lupus erythematosus is usually good when the drug is withdrawn. This review discusses the differences between drug-induced lupus erythematosus and systemic lupus erythematosus, the mechanisms of action of drug-induced lupus erythematosus and drugs that are usually associated with drug-induced lupus erythematosus, with particular focus on the biological treatments.

Idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions: current concepts

Idiosyncratic drug reactions are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for patients; they also markedly increase the uncertainty of drug development. The major targets are skin, liver, and bone marrow. Clinical characteristics suggest that IDRs are immune mediated, and there is substantive evidence that most, but not all, IDRs are caused by chemically reactive species. However, rigorous mechanistic studies are very difficult to perform, especially in the absence of valid animal models. Models to explain how drugs or reactive metabolites interact with the MHC/T-cell receptor complex include the hapten and P-I models, and most recently it was found that abacavir can interact reversibly with MHC to alter the endogenous peptides that are presented to T cells. The discovery of HLA molecules as important risk factors for some IDRs has also significantly contributed to our understanding of these adverse reactions, but it is not yet clear what fraction of IDRs have a strong HLA dependence. In addition, with the exception of abacavir, most patients who have the HLA that confers a higher IDR risk with a specific drug will not have an IDR when treated with that drug. Interindividual differences in T-cell receptors and other factors also presumably play a role in determining which patients will have an IDR. The immune response represents a delicate balance, and immune tolerance may be the dominant response to a drug that can cause IDRs.

Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: evidence for differences from its idiopathic counterpart

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (DI-SCLE) is a lupus variant with predominant skin involvement temporally related to drug exposure and resolving after drug discontinuation. It usually presents with annular polycyclic or papulosquamous eruptions on sun-exposed skin and shows serum anti-Ro/SSA antibodies.

OBJECTIVES

To address the question whether DI-SCLE differs significantly from idiopathic SCLE by virtue of clinical features.

METHODS

Ninety patients with SCLE seen in our departments from 2001 to 2010 were reviewed. Eleven of them diagnosed as having DI-SCLE were evaluated for type of skin lesions, systemic involvement, clinical course, and histopathological, direct immunofluorescence and laboratory findings. The cutaneous features were compared with those of the 79 patients with idiopathic SCLE.

RESULTS

The cutaneous picture was widespread in 82% of patients with DI-SCLE and in 6% of those with idiopathic SCLE [odds ratio (OR) 66·6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 11·2-394·9; P = 0·0001]. Bullous and erythema multiforme (EM)-like lesions were present in 45% of patients with DI-SCLE and in 1% of those with idiopathic SCLE (OR 65·0, 95% CI 6·5-649·6; P = 0·0001). Vasculitic lesions were observed in 45% of patients with DI-SCLE and in 3% of those with idiopathic SCLE (OR 32·1, 95% CI 5·1-201·7; P = 0·0001). Malar rash occurred in 45% of patients with DI-SCLE and in 6% of those with idiopathic SCLE (OR 12·3, 95% CI 2·8-54·9; P = 0·001). Visceral manifestations were excluded in all patients with DI-SCLE. Anti-Ro/SSA antibodies were found in all but one patient with DI-SCLE and disappeared after resolution in 73% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

DI-SCLE differs from idiopathic SCLE by virtue of distinctive cutaneous features, particularly the widespread presentation and the frequent occurrence of malar rash and bullous, EM-like and vasculitic manifestations.

Drug-induced lupus: an update on its dermatologic aspects

Drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE) is defined as an entity characterized by clinical manifestations and immunopathological serum findings similar to those of idiopathic lupus but which is temporally related to continuous drug exposure and resolves after discontinuation of the offending drug. Similar to idiopathic lupus, DILE can be divided into systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) and chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE). Based on the literature review and retrospective analysis of our case series, we focused on the dermatological aspects of DILE. The cutaneous features of drug-induced SLE are protean, including particularly purpura, erythema nodosum and photosensitivity as well as the skin lesions characterizing both urticarial and necrotizing vasculitis. The typical laboratory profile of systemic DILE consists of positive antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and antihistone antibodies, the latter being regarded as the serum marker of this subset. The drugs most frequently implicated in the development of systemic DILE are hydralazine, procainamide, isoniazid and minocycline. Drug-induced SCLE usually presents with annular polycyclic or papulosquamous cutaneous manifestations as in the idiopathic form, but blisters or targetoid lesions mimicking erythema multiforme cannot rarely be associated. The clinical presentation is often generalized, with involvement of the lower legs that are usually spared in idiopathic SCLE. ANA and anti-Ro/SSA antibodies are usually present, whereas antihistone antibodies are uncommonly found. Drugs associated with SCLE include particularly calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, thiazide diuretics, terbinafine and the recently reported tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonists. Drug-induced CCLE is very rarely described in the literature and usually refers to fluorouracile agents or TNF-α antagonists. The picture is characterized by the occurrence of classic discoid lesions, but aspects of lupus tumidus can occasionally develop. ANA are demonstrated in around two-thirds of the cases. Management of DILE is based on the withdrawal of the offending drug. Topical and/or systemic corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents should be reserved for resistant cases.

RETRACTED: Drug-induced lupus erythematosus

Drug-induced lupus is a syndrome which share symptoms and laboratory characteristics with idiopathic systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The terms drug-induced lupus (DIL) and drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE) are preferred, but other ones are also used-drug-related lupus, lupus-like syndrome and lupus erythematosus medicamentosus. The first case of DILE was reported in 1945 and associated with sulfadiazine. In 1953, it was reported that DILE was related to the use of hydralazine. More than 80 drugs have been associated with DILE. The average age of patients with DILE is nearly twice that of patients with idiopathic SLE. Approximately half the patients with drug-induced SLE are women, compared with 90% of patients with idiopathic SLE. Similarly to idiopathic lupus, DILE can be divided into systemic, sub-acute cutaneous and chronic cutaneous lupus. The syndrome is characterised by arthralgia, myalgia, pleurisy, rash and fever in association with antinuclear antibodies in the serum. The clinical and laboratory manifestations of drug-induced SLE are similar to those of idiopathic SLE, but central nervous system and renal involvement are rare in DILE. Recognition of DILE is important because it usually reverts within a few weeks after stopping the drug. This review discusses the general issues in DILE, such as pathogenic mechanisms, clinical forms and diagnostic criteria, and provides more detailed information for some of the most recent implicated drugs: minocycline, statins, anti-TNF-alpha agents.

Recent advances in cardiorespiratory medicine: management of pulmonary embolism and prevention of venous thromboembolism, recent treatment strategies in childhood asthma, and dermatological adverse reactions to cardiovascular drugs

This article is the fifth in a series of CPD articles aimed at reviewing the recent general medical literature relating to topics that may be of interest to dermatologists. This issue looks at advances in cardiorespiratory medicine, including the management of pulmonary embolism and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VT), recent treatment strategies in childhood asthma, and an update on dermatological adverse reactions to cardiovascular drugs.

Syndrome de Stevens-Johnson et aggravation d’un lupus systémique induits par la terbinafine

BACKGROUND

There have been published reports of induction and aggravation of subacute systemic lupus erythematosus of lupus by terbinafine. We report the case of female patient with systemic lupus erythematosus who, after treatment with terbinafine, presented a Stevens Johnson syndrome eruption, together with renal exacerbation of her connective tissue disease.

OBSERVATION

A 25 - year-old woman was followed for 4 years for systemic lupus erythematosus was no renal involvement. The patient was stable under corticosteroids (20 mg/d) and chloroquine (200 mg/d). She was treated with terbinafine onychomycosis caused by Trichophyton rubrum. Seven days after trunk and limbs, with cheilitis affecting the mucous membrane and bilateral conjunctivitis. This rash was followed by epidermolysis involving 10% of the cutaneous area. Stevens-Johnson syndrome was diagnosed. Laboratory tests indicated massive hematuria and proteinuria, and the renal needle biopsy sample showed signs of class III lupus glomerulonephritis. The anti-histone antibodies were highly positive. The patient was treated with systemic corticosteroids (1 mg/kg/d), chloroquine was recommenced and cyclophosphamides were given in a bolus. The outcome of the patient's eruption and lupus was favorable.

DISCUSSION

Although induction and worsening of lupus by terbinafine have already been reported, the present case differs through the concomitant occurrence of eruption on treatment with terbinafine and severe relapse of lupus, thus suggesting the involvement of a shared immunological mechanism.

Coexisting subacute and systemic lupus erythematosus after terbinafine administration: successful treatment with mycophenolate mofetil

A 39-year-old female patient with systemic lupus erythematosus was treated with terbinafine for onychomycosis. After only 7 days of treatment with 250 mg terbinafine, a widespread severe erythematous eruption developed. The results of clinical, histological and immunofluorescent examinations confirmed the diagnosis of coexisting subacute and systemic lupus erythematosus. The patient was treated with drug withdrawal and administration of cyclosporine and methylprednisolone. One year later, mycophenolate mofetil was successfully used. Exacerbation or induction of lupus erythematosus is an extremely rare cutaneous side-effect of terbinafine. Patients with lupus erythematosus should be advised about the risk of some drugs that might exacerbate their disease.

Aggravation d’un lupus érythémateux subaigu sous infliximab

BACKGROUND

Infliximab (Remicade) is an anti-TNF alpha indicated in the treatment of chronic inflammatory rheumatism, notably rheumatoid arthritis.

CASE-REPORT

We report the case of a 56 year-old woman who developed severe worsening of an SSA-positive subacute lupus erythematosus on initiation of treatment with infliximab for rheumatoid arthritis.

DISCUSSION

A review of the literature found 30 cases of drug-induced lupus and listed the autoimmune modifications induced by anti-TNF alpha. This first case of subacute lupus erythematosus, existing before the introduction of treatment and worsening during the latter, emphasizes the risk of developing a severe flare of an autoimmune disease during treatment with anti-TNF alpha. It raises the question of the relative contraindications of anti-TNF alpha in patients with lupus erythematosus.

Drug-induced lupus erythematosus

Among the numerous idiopathic immune-mediated diseases that can be drug-induced, such as pemphigus, psoriasis, lichen, etc, drug-induced lupus is the most widely commented upon and investigated. The terms drug-induced lupus (DIL) and drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE) are preferred, but other ones are also used--drug-related lupus, lupus-like syndrome, and lupus erythematosus medicamentosus. This review discusses the general issues in DILE, such as pathogenic mechanisms, clinical forms, and diagnostic criteria, and provides more detailed information for some of the implicated drugs: minocycline, statins, terbinafine, etc.

Drug-induced, Ro/SSA-positive cutaneous lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical and immunopathologic findings of drug-induced, Ro/SSA-positive cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE).

DESIGN

Retrospective medical and laboratory record review.

SETTING

Immunodermatology Division of Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, Md).

PATIENTS

Of 120 patients found to have anti-Ro/SSA antibodies by hemagglutination and/or double immunodiffusion, 70 had clinical and immunopathologic confirmation of CLE. Fifteen of these 70 patients had a history of new drug exposure, defined as less than 6 months, associated with disease development.

RESULTS

The disease-associated drugs included hydrochlorothiazide (5 patients), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (3 patients), calcium channel blockers (3 patients), interferons (2 patients), and statins (2 patients). The most common presentations were photodistributed diffuse erythema and subacute CLE-type lesions without evidence of significant systemic disease. All specimens revealed interface dermatitis and fine granular IgG deposition along the basement membrane zone and throughout the epidermis. Most patients experienced improvement or resolution of clinical lesions within 8 weeks and decrease of Ro/SSA titers within 8 months after discontinuation of drug treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Antihypertensive drugs are the most commonly associated with Ro-positive CLE. Clinical and immunopathologic features of this drug-induced variant do not seem to differ from the idiopathic disease. In most cases, the disease improves or resolves on discontinuation of the offending drug treatment. It is not known if these drugs precipitate disease in patients who have subclinical disease. Drug-induced Ro/SSA-positive CLE should be included on the differential diagnosis in patients presenting with photosensitive or subacute CLE-type eruptions.

Management of skin disease in patients with lupus erythematosus

Skin disease in patients with lupus erythematosus may be subdivided into two broad categories - those represented by a 'specific' histopathology, the interface dermatitis, and those with changes that are not specific to lupus erythematosus, for example, vasculitis, mucin infiltration, etc. The specific skin lesions that are most common are discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE). Evaluation will allow the treating physician to assign a prognosis. Cutaneous lesions can generally be managed with standard therapies. Patients with discoid LE and subacute cutaneous LE are generally photosensitive, and therefore sunscreens, protective clothing and behavioural alteration should be discussed with all patients. Topical corticosteroids are a standard form of therapy, but 'newer' agents such as retinoids, calcipotriene and tacrolimus might be effective. Antimalarial agents are generally effective. Attempts to reduce or stop smoking may aid in the control of cutaneous LE. The choice of alternative therapy is personal, and discussions of the risks and benefits should be carefully documented.