Sagittal and vertical changes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion according to the Cetlin method

Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class II subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols

Background

This study cephalometrically compared the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes consequent to one and three-premolar extraction protocols of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment.

Methods

A sample of 126 lateral cephalometric radiographs from 63 patients was selected and divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 31 type 1 class II subdivision malocclusion patients treated with asymmetric extractions of two maxillary premolars and one mandibular premolar on the class I side, with an initial mean age of 13.58 years. Group 2 consisted of 32 type 2 class II subdivision malocclusion patients treated with asymmetric extraction of one maxillary first premolar on the class II side, with an initial mean age of 13.98 years. t test was used for intergroup comparison at the pre- and posttreatment stages and to compare the treatment changes.

Results

Group 1 had greater maxillomandibular sagittal discrepancy reduction and greater maxillary first molar extrusion. Group 2 had mandibular incisor labial inclination and protrusion, and group 1 had mandibular incisor lingual inclination and retraction. Maxillary molar asymmetry increased in group 2, while mandibular molar asymmetry increased in group 1.

Conclusions

The treatment changes produced by these two class II subdivision protocols are different to adequately satisfy the different needs for types 1 and 2 class II subdivision malocclusions.

Bilateral en-masse distalization of maxillary posterior teeth with skeletal anchorage: a case report

Objective:

The aim of this study was to introduce a new method for bilateral distal movement of the entire maxillary posterior segment.

Case report:

A 17-year-old girl with Class I skeletal malocclusion (end-to-end molar relationships, deviated midline and space deficiency for left maxillary canine) was referred for orthodontic treatment. She did not accept maxillary first premolars extraction. A modified Hyrax appliance (Dentaurum Ispringen, Germany) was used for bilateral distalization of maxillary posterior teeth simultaneously. Expansion vector was set anteroposteriorly. Posterior legs of Hyrax were welded to first maxillary molar bands. All posterior teeth on each side consolidated with a segment of 0.017 × 0.025-in stainless steel wire from the buccal side. Anterior legs of Hyrax were bent into eyelet form and attached to the anterior palate with two mini-screws (2 × 10 mm) (Jeil Medical Corporation Seoul, South Korea). Hyrax opening rate was 0.8 mm per month. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were used to evaluate the extent of distal movement. 3.5-mm distalization of posterior maxillary teeth was achieved in five months.

Results:

A nearly bodily distal movement without anchorage loss was obtained.

Conclusion:

The mini-screw-supported modified Hyrax appliance was found to be helpful for achieving en-masse distal movement of maxillary posterior teeth.

Dentoskeletal effects of the fast-back molar distalizer followed by fixed appliances

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to analyze the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes induced by the Fast-Back appliance followed by fixed appliances when compared with untreated Class II controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The treated and untreated samples consisted of 27 subjects each (16 girls and 11 boys in the Fast-Back Group, FBG; 15 girls and 12 boys in the control Group, CG) with mean ages at the start of treatment of 13 years 3 months in the FBG and 13 years 2 months in the CG. Subjects of the FBG were treated during either the pubertal or postpubertal periods. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed at 2 observation periods: before distalization (T1) and after comprehensive orthodontic treatment appliance (T2). The T1-T2 changes in the FBG were contrasted with those in the CG by means of Mann-Whitney U test (p<0.05).

RESULTS

Treatment induced an average correction of molar relationship of 2.4mm. The significant correction of the overjet (2.1mm) was associated with a significant amount of lower incisor proclination (3.8 degrees). A significant extrusion of lower molars (1.8mm) was recorded in the FBG. The FBG showed also a significant increase in total mandibular length (Co-Gn, 2.6mm), a counterclockwise rotation of the palatal plane (1.4 degrees), an increase in anterior facial height (N-Me, 2.7 mm), and in mandibular ramus height (Co-Go, 2.6mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The Fast-Back is an effective appliance for Class II correction during the pubertal or postpubertal periods.

Non-compliance maxillary molar distalizing appliances: an overview of the last decade

OBJECTIVES

To perform a literature review focusing on the use of non-compliance intraoral appliances for molar distalization therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search ranged from January 1999 to December 2009 in order to describe dento-alveolar changes and skeletal vertical modifications following the use of conventional anchorage intraoral distalizing appliances. The quality of the retrieved studies was ranked on a 12-points scale, from low to high quality.

RESULTS

A total of 214 articles were found and only 24 were considered eligible for the critical examination. Maxillary first molar distalization ranged from 6.4mm to 0.5mm with a concomitant distal tipping from 18.5° to bodily distalization. A smaller amount of distal movement and a greater amount of crown tipping can be noted at second molars. Premolar anchorage loss and incisor proclination represent an unavoidable side-effect and ranged from 4.33 mm to 0.73 mm and from 13.7° to 0.6° respectively. Skeletal vertical modifications were noted. Increase in vertical facial dimension ranged from 1.5° to -1.8° and lower anterior facial height ranged from an increase of 3.2 to a decrease of 0.6 mm. The assessment of study quality showed that 19 studies were of low quality, 3 of medium quality and 2 of medium-high quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Maxillary molar distalization can be effectively performed with the use of noncompliance intraoral appliances. As a consequence, premolar anchorage loss, incisor proclination and a slight increase in vertical facial dimension can occur. Because of the lack of high-quality studies the findings of this review should be carefully interpreted.

Mandibular lip bumper treatment and second molar eruption disturbances

INTRODUCTION

Mandibular lip-bumper (LB) nonextraction treatment, usually started before complete second molar (M2) eruption, inevitably interacts with the development of the dentition. Yet, its effects on M2 eruption are still unknown. The first aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate whether LB therapy (260 patients) enhances the risk for M2 ectopic eruptions and impactions in comparison with 135 untreated subjects. The second aim was to assess, among treated patients (n = 197), the main potential determinants of M2 impaction and ectopic eruption.

METHODS

M2 eruption and impaction were determined on panoramic radiographs. To assess the predictive role of M2 inclination in relation to the first molar, a panoramic radiograph suitable for this measurement before treatment was required. The data were analyzed by using software (version 8.2, SAS, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

LB treatment significantly enhanced M2 impaction and ectopic eruption. Negative prognostic factors were found. An initial inclination of the M2 greater than 30° was significantly associated with a higher impaction risk compared with an angulation less than 10°. LB treatment duration longer than 2 years increased the risk of ectopic eruptions.

CONCLUSIONS

While gaining space in the anterior arch, unwanted effects might be produced in the posterior arch. To be informed about these unplanned events is necessary to better optimize treatment.

A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: Distal jet versus pendulum

INTRODUCTION

This study compared the dentoalveolar and skeletal effects on Class II malocclusions of the distal jet with concurrent full fixed appliances and the pendulum appliance both followed by fixed appliances.

METHODS

The 2 samples each consisted of 32 subjects (19 girls and 13 boys) with mean ages at the start of treatment of 12 years 3 months in the distal jet group and 12 years 6 months in the pendulum group. The durations of the distalization phase of treatment were 10 months in the distal jet group and 7 months in the pendulum group, and the durations of the second phase of treatment with fixed appliances were 18 months in the distal jet group and 24 months in the pendulum group. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed at 3 observation times: before treatment, after distalization, and after orthodontic treatment.

RESULTS

During molar distalization, the pendulum subjects showed significantly more distal molar movement and significantly less anchorage loss at both the premolars and the maxillary incisors than the distal jet subjects. The distal jet used simultaneously with fixed appliances and the pendulum were equal in their ability to move the molars bodily. Very little change occurred in the inclination of the mandibular plane at the end of the 2-phase treatment (less than 1 degrees ) in both groups. At the end of comprehensive treatment, the maxillary first molars were 0.6 mm mesial to their original positions in the distal jet group and 0.5 mm distal in the pendulum group. Nevertheless, total molar correction was identical in the 2 groups (3.0 mm), and both appliances were equally effective in achieving a Class I molar relationship. Simultaneous edgewise orthodontic treatment during molar distalization in the distal jet group shortened the overall treatment time but produced significant flaring of both maxillary and mandibular incisors at the end of treatment. The impact on the soft tissue profile was minimal with both appliances.

Dentoskeletal effects induced by rapid molar distalization with the first class appliance

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment effects of the first class appliance (FCA; Leone, Firenze, Italy), a new intraoral device for unilateral or bilateral rapid molar distalizaton. A retrospective study was conducted to compare the predistalization and postdistalization cephalograms of 17 patients (10 male, 7 female) with Class II malocclusions treated with the FCA. Mean age at the start of treatment was 13 years 4 months. The FCA produced rapid molar distalization, and the bilateral Class II molar relationship was corrected in 2.4 months, on average. Maxillary molar distalization contributed to 70% of the space created anterior to the first molars; 30% of the space was due to reciprocal anchorage loss of the maxillary second premolars. The maxillary first molars showed a significant distalization of 4.0 mm, associated with a significant distal axial incline of 4.6 degrees and a significant extrusion of 1.2 mm. As for anchorage loss, the second premolars exhibited a significant mesial movement of 1.7 mm, associated with a significant mesial axial incline of 2.2 degrees and a nonsignificant extrusion of 1.0 mm. In the anterior region, a significant mesial movement of the maxillary incisor of 1.3 mm was associated with a significant incisor proclination (2.6 degrees ) and a significant increase in overjet (1.2 mm). No significant changes in either sagittal or vertical skeletal relationships were observed. The results suggest that the FCA is an efficient and reliable device for distalizing the maxillary permanent first molars.

Distal molar movement with Kloehn headgear: is it stable?

The aim of this study was to evaluate intramaxillary molar movement after 8 months of cervical traction and posttreatment displacement 7 years later. The total molar displacements in relation to stable intraosseous reference points were compared with those observed in an untreated control group that also had intraosseous reference indicators inserted. During the headgear period, the type of molar displacement could be predicted by the direction of the force system acting on the teeth. It was noted, however, that the variation in the vertical development was related more to each patient's growth pattern than to the force system applied. After cessation of the headgear, intramaxillary displacement of the molars was noted, and the total displacement of the molars did not differ from that of the untreated group. The indication for intramaxillary displacement of the molars by means of extraoral traction is therefore questioned.

Upper molar distalization: a critical analysis

Traditional upper molar distalization techniques require patient co-operation with the headgear or elastics. Recently, several different intraoral procedures have been introduced to minimize the need for patient co-operation. This article reviews the appliances currently available for maxillary molar distalization and critically analyses their dentoalveolar and skeletal effects.