In vivo evaluation of the surface of posterior resin composite restorations: a pilot study

In vivo wear of CAD-CAM composite versus lithium disilicate full coverage first-molar restorations: a pilot study over 2 years

Objectives

To present a digital approach to measure and compare material wear behavior of antagonistic first molar restorations made of an experimental CAD/CAM composite (COMP) and lithium disilicate ceramic (LS2) in patients with reconstructed vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) after generalized hard tissue loss.

Methods

A total of 12 patients underwent complete full jaw rehabilitation with full occlusal coverage restorations made either of COMP or LS2. The first molar restorations (n = 48) were chosen for wear examination. At annual recall appointments, polyether impressions were taken, and resulting plaster casts were digitalized using a laboratory scanner. Mean observation period was 371 days for first and 769 days for second year. The resulting 96 datasets were analyzed by superimposition of 3-D datasets using an iterative best-fit method. Based on the superimposition data, the wear rates of the occlusal contact areas (OCAs) were calculated.

Results

For antagonistic restorations made of COMP, the average wear rate was 24.8 ± 13.3 μm/month, while for LS2, it was 9.5 ± 4.3 μm/month in first year, with significant differences (p < 0.0001) between the materials. In second year, monthly wear rates decreased significantly for both materials: COMP (16.2 ± 10.7 μm/month) and LS2 (5.5 ± 3.3 μm/month). Statistical comparison between wear time showed significant differences for both materials: COMP p < 0.037 and LS2 p < 0.001. A logarithmic fit (COMP R² = 0.081; LS2 R² = 0.038) of the data was calculated to estimate the wear progression.

Significance

In patients with reconstructed VDO, restorations made of LS2 show a more stable wear behavior than ones out of experimental CAD/CAM composite. In cases of complete rehabilitation, load bearing CAD/CAM-composite restorations should be critically considered for application due to their occlusal wear behavior. However, when choosing a restorative material, not only the functional occlusal stability should be taken into account but also the prospect of minimally invasive treatment with maximum preservation of natural tooth structures.

Wear measurement of dental tissues and materials in clinical studies: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to systematically review the different methods used for wear measurement of dental tissues and materials in clinical studies, their relevance and reliability in terms of accuracy and precision, and the performance of the different steps of the workflow taken independently.

METHODS

An exhaustive search of clinical studies related to wear of dental tissues and materials reporting a quantitative measurement method was conducted. MedLine, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were used. Prospective studies, pilot studies and case series (>10 patients), as long as they contained a description of wear measurement methodology. Only studies published after 1995 were considered.

RESULTS

After duplicates' removal, 495 studies were identified, and 41 remained for quantitative analysis. Thirty-four described wear-measurement protocols, using digital profilometry and superimposition, whereas 7 used alternative protocols. A specific form was designed to analyze the risk of bias. The methods were described in terms of material analyzed; study design; device used for surface acquisition; matching software details and settings; type of analysis (vertical height-loss measurement vs volume loss measurement); type of area investigated (entire occlusal area or selective areas); and results.

SINIFICANCE

There is a need of standardization of clinical wear measurement. Current methods exhibit accuracy, which is not sufficient to monitor wear of restorative materials and tooth tissues. Their performance could be improved, notably limiting the use of replicas, using standardized calibration procedures and positive controls, optimizing the settings of scanners and matching softwares, and taking into account unusable data.

Clinical studies of dental erosion and erosive wear

We define erosion as a partial demineralisation of enamel or dentine by intrinsic or extrinsic acids and erosive tooth wear as the accelerated loss of dental hard tissue through the combined effect of erosion and mechanical wear (abrasion and attrition) on the tooth surface. Most experts believe that during the last decade there has been a significant increase in the prevalence and severity of erosive tooth wear, particularly in adolescents. Even when erosive wear occurs in its milder forms, this is a matter of concern, as it may compromise the integrity of an otherwise healthy dentition in later life. The erosive wear process is complicated and modified by many chemical, behavioural and associated processes in the mouth. If interventions are to be developed it is therefore important that in vivo methods are developed to assess the outcomes of the erosion and erosive wear processes and the effects of interventions upon them. This paper discusses potential methods of investigating erosion and erosive wear in vivo and the difficulties associated with clinical studies.

Wear of feldspathic ceramic, nano-filled composite resin and acrylic resin artificial teeth when opposed to different antagonists

The aim of this study was to evaluate the wear of denture teeth and their antagonists produced by two-body and three-body wear tests. Three types of denture teeth, namely feldspathic ceramic (FC), nano-filled composite resin (NCR), and experimental acrylic resin teeth (AR), were tested. For each type two groups of eight upper premolars each were prepared. The first group was tested against cusps from the same material and the second group was tested against human enamel cusps. Each group was loaded with a total of 200,000 chewing cycles (two-body wear 100,000 cycles and three-body wear 100,000 cycles). Wear was analyzed by measuring the maximum depth and volume loss of the denture teeth using a laser scanner and by measuring the vertical loss of the antagonists using an optical macroscope. Statistically, there was no significant difference between the following combinations: FC-FC and NCR-NCR regarding the vertical and volume loss; and FC-enamel and NCR-enamel regarding the total vertical substance loss. The combinations AR-AR and AR-enamel showed higher wear values than the other combinations. For complete dentures, composite resin and ceramic teeth showed similar vertical and volume loss, whereas composite resin teeth seemed to be more suitable for partial dentures opposing natural teeth in terms of wear of teeth and antagonists.

Evaluation of a profilometrical method for monitoring erosive tooth wear

The in vivo monitoring of erosive wear is difficult because lesions mostly progress relatively slowly and reliable reference points are difficult to obtain. To date, only a few methods for clinical monitoring of erosive loss have been described, which either require extensive equipment or do not provide sufficient sensitivity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate, using study models (epoxy resin material), a procedure that permits the reliable and accurate monitoring of erosive substance loss within acceptable observation periods. The method is the profilometric measurement of erosive tissue loss using acid-resistant markers, which represent both a reference area and a structure for the defined retracing of a given erosive lesion surface. The study model magnified values slightly (2.8%; not significant), the precision was < 4 microm, and the repeatability was good (95% limits of repeatability ranging from -4.7 to 5.2 microm). The estimated detection threshold for erosive loss is 15 microm, which appears to be adequate for monitoring. The method is indicated for special dental care in cases of severe dental erosion (e.g. eating disorders) and for clinical studies.

A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: Three-year results

OBJECTIVES

Ormocer composites, consisting of a silicon-based polymer, have been developed recently as a tooth-coloured restorative material. The purpose of this prospective randomised clinical trial was to evaluate the performance of two small-particle hybrid ormocer-based restorative systems (AD, Admira/Admira Bond, VOCO; DE, Definite/Etch & Prime 3.0, Dentsply) and one small-particle hybrid bis-GMA-based composite restorative system (TC, Tetric-Ceram/Syntac, Ivoclar-Vivadent) in occlusal stress-bearing restorations.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-eight occlusal-proximal restorations (44 AD, 43 DE and 41 TC) were placed according to the manufacturer's instructions in thirty-two adult patients. Their clinical performance was scored according to the USPHS criteria and evaluation of bite-wing radiographs.

RESULTS

After 3 years, four AD, five DE and four TC restorations had failed due to fracture or marginal gap formation. Surface roughness improved significantly when compared to the baseline in AD and TC (Friedman test, p<0.05) during the first year but returned to baseline values after 3 years. DE had a significant tendency towards discolouration (p<0.05). Bite-wing radiographs showed two AD and one TC restorations with internal porosities. ANOVA showed that larger restorations (> or = 3 surfaces) showed significantly more degradation than smaller ones.

CONCLUSIONS

In a group of class II restorations, there was no significant difference in failures after 3 years between ormocer-based and bis-GMA-based restorative systems.

Influence of filler loading on the two-body wear of a dental composite

The purpose of the study was to explore the fundamental wear behaviour of a dental composite with different filler loadings under two-body wear conditions. The parent resin and filler components were mixed according to different weight ratios to produce experimental composites with filler loadings ranging from 20 to 87.5% by weight. A two-body wear test was conducted on the experimental composites using a wear-testing machine. The machine was designed to simulate the impact of the direct cyclic masticatory loading that occurs in the occlusal contact area in vivo. The results showed that there was little increase in the rate of wear with filler loadings below 60 wt%, but a sharp increase between 80 and 87.5 wt% in filler loading. Wide striations and bulk loss of material were apparent on the wear surfaces at higher filler loadings. Coefficients of friction increased with filler loading and followed the increase in rate of wear loss closely. It was concluded that, under two-body wear conditions, addition of high levels of filler particles into the resin matrix could reduce the wear resistance of dental composites. This finding may help when designing future dental composites for use in particular clinical settings.

Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique

PURPOSE

To report the 4-year clinical performance of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a period of 1 year, 726 restorations (248 molars, 478 premolars; 260 Class I, 466 Class II; 540 replacements, 186 primary decay) were placed on conservative preparations, using the incremental placement technique in a clinical environment. Baseline data were collected, and the restorations were evaluated after 4 years. Z100 and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SBMP) (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, Minnesota) were used as the restorative system. The criteria evaluated were color match, marginal adaptation, anatomic form, cavosurface marginal discoloration, axial contour, interproximal contact, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, and tooth vitality.

RESULTS

At baseline, 24% of the teeth restored presented postoperative sensitivity; 86% of the sensitive teeth were from the replacement group. At 4 years, all teeth were vital to cold test. Eighteen restorations (2.5%) presented clinically detectable marginal fracture. The shade was acceptable in all restorations. Cavosurface marginal discoloration was observed in 47 restorations (6.5% bravo scores). Axial contour, interproximal contact, and marginal adaptation received 100% alfa scores. No secondary caries was diagnosed in any of the teeth examined. None of the examined restorations required replacement.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Under controlled clinical conditions, posterior resin-based composite restorations placed with the total-etch technique and restorative Z100/SBMP have the potential to present a high success rate at 4 years. None of the examined restorations required replacement, and there was no clinically detectable wear in any of the restorations. Simultaneous etching of enamel and dentin followed by the application of a resin adhesive can be considered an adequate modality of pulp protection in nonexposed tooth preparations.

In vivo wear of three types of veneering materials using implant-supported restorations: a method evaluation

In a previous study, we determined the precision and the positional duplicability of a system that used implant connectors to transfer restorations between the oral cavity and the measuring device. The objectives of the present study were to determine whether this testing procedure was suitable for clinical use, and to apply the procedure to the longitudinal assessment of the wear of three types of veneering materials. Ten patients received a total of 12 restorations. The restorations were made either of ceramic (positive control), poly(methylmethacrylate) resin (negative control) or of composite resin. The restorations were profiled at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months. For profiling, the restorations were secured to the x-y table of the measuring device using the octagonal connector of the ITI implant system. Numerical analyzes were performed using a commercial array-oriented software package. The ceramic and the composite wore at roughly 12-14 microm yr(-1) (height) 10-12 microm3 microm2 yr(-1) (volume). The resin wore at c. 50 micorm yr(-1) (height) and c. 45 microm3 microm2 yr(-1) (volume). The error of the procedure was estimated at +/- 13%. It was concluded that the procedure was applicable for clinical studies, and that the composite did not differ from the ceramic as to its wear rate.