Hepatic artery reconstruction in living-donor liver transplantation: a review of its techniques and complications

Long-Term Suitability of Left Gastric Artery Inflow for Arterial Perfusion of Living Donor Right Lobe Grafts

Poorer than expected, living donor liver transplant outcomes are observed after recipient graft artery thrombosis. At grafting, the risk for later thrombosis is high if a dissected hepatic artery is used for standard reconstruction. Surgeon diagnosis of dissection requires nonstandard management with alternative technique in addition to microvascular expertise. Intimal flap repair with standard reconstruction is contingent on basis of a redo anastomosis. It is a suboptimal choice for living donor transplantation. Achieving goal graft arterial perfusion at first revascularization is crucial for superior outcomes. Managing dissection at grafting with nonstandard left gastric artery reconstruction is unreported. Our experience is limited, but this is our preferred alternative technique to standard hepatic artery reconstruction complicated by dissection. Here, we describe our two-case experience with left gastric arterialized grafts for management of dissection. Our living donor graft recipients with alternatively arterialized grafts are now 6- and 2-years posttransplant.

Techniques of hepatic arterial reconstruction in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatic artery reconstruction is an essential part of liver transplantation. This difficult stage of the operation is even more demanding in living donor liver transplantation than in deceased donor liver transplantation. One of the most important advances in hepatic artery reconstruction for living liver grafts was the introduction of microsurgical techniques involving an operative microscope or surgical loupe. Many surgical reconstruction techniques have been used in this field.

PURPOSE

In this article, first, we will talk about the hepatic artery reconstruction techniques that are frequently used in deceased donor liver transplantation, and afterward, we will talk about the hepatic artery reconstruction techniques used in living donor liver transplantation, which include the hepatic artery reconstruction technique we use and call "one stay corner suture technique".

CONCLUSIONS

We think high-volume transplant centers should tend to develop a standardized technique for doing hepatic artery reconstruction with their teams. We think the "one stay corner suture technique" can be easily applied in centers that perform LDLT.

Management of difficult hepatic artery reconstructions to reduce complications through continual technical refinements in living donor liver transplantations

BACKGROUND

Hepatic artery reconstruction (HAR) for liver transplantation is crucial for successful outcomes. We evaluated transplantation outcome improvement through continual technical refinements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HAR was performed in 1448 living donor liver transplants by a single plastic surgeon from 2008 to 2020. Difficult HARs were defined as graft or recipient hepatic artery ≤2 mm, size discrepancy (≥2 to 1), multiple hepatic arteries, suboptimal quality, intimal dissection of graft or recipient hepatic artery (HA), and immediate redo during transplantation. Technique refinements include early vessel injury recognition, precise HA dissection, the use of clips to ligate branches, an oblique cut for all HARs, a modified funneling method for size discrepancy, liberal use of an alternative artery to replace a pathologic HA, and reconstruction of a second HA for grafts with dual hepatic arteries in the graft.

RESULTS

Difficult HARs were small HA (21.35%), size discrepancy (12.57%), multiple hepatic arteries (11.28%), suboptimal quality (31.1%), intimal dissection (20.5%), and immediate redo (5.18%). The overall hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) rate was 3.04% in this series. The average HAT rate during the last 4 years (2017-2020) was 1.46% (6/408), which was significantly lower than the average HAT rate from 2008 to 2016 (39/1040, 3.8%) with a statistical significance (p = 0.025). Treatment for posttransplant HAT included anastomosis after trim back (9), reconstruction using alternatives (19), and nonsurgical treatment with urokinase (9).

CONCLUSION

Careful examination of the HA under surgical microscope and selection of the appropriate recipient HA are key to successful reconstruction. Through continual technical refinements, we can reduce HA complications to the lowest degree.

Artery Reconstruction in Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Donor-Recipient Vessel Ratio Is Key to Choosing Recipient Artery

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to investigate if recipient artery choice in right lobe living donor liver transplant affects postoperative complications and discuss solutions accordingly.

METHODS

Three hundred fourteen right lobe living donor liver transplantation patients were divided into 2 groups: 163 patients using right hepatic artery as the recipient vessel and 151 patients using left hepatic artery as the recipient vessel. Cases involving 2 recipient blood vessels or the use of other blood vessels as recipient vessels were excluded.

RESULTS

Overall vascular embolism rate in both groups was 1.3%, and our complication rate was lower than those in previous studies. There was no significant difference in complication rate between the groups, but a significant difference in recipient/donor artery size ratio was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Although left hepatic artery's anatomical position makes it less affected by bile duct anastomosis and thus fewer postoperative complications, we believe that the ratio of the donor-recipient blood vessel size and the length of the anastomosis vessel stumps are the key factors that affect the outcome of the vascular anastomosis.

Hepatic artery reconstruction using an operating microscope in pediatric liver transplantation-Is it worth the effort?

INTRODUCTION

In pediatric liver transplantation (pLT), hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is associated with inferior transplant outcome. Hepatic artery reconstruction (HAR) using an operating microscope (OM) is considered to reduce the incidence of HAT.

METHODS

HAR using an OM was compared to a historic cohort using surgical loupes (SL) in pLT performed between 2009 and 2020. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of HAT. Secondary endpoints were 1-year patient and graft survival determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and complications. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for HAT and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 79 pLTs were performed [30 (38.0%) living donations; 49 (62.0%) postmortem donations] divided into 23 (29.1%) segment 2/3, 32 (40.5%) left lobe, 4 (5.1%) extended right lobe, and 20 (25.3%) full-size grafts. One-year patient and graft survival were both 95.2% in the OM group versus 86.2% and 77.8% in the SL group (p = .276 and p = .077). HAT rate was 0% in the OM group versus 24.1% in the SL group (p = .013). One-year patient and graft survival were 64.3% and 35.7% in patient with HAT, compared to 93.9% and 92.8% in patients with no HAT (both p < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed HAR with SL (p = .022) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) (p = .014) as independent risk factors for HAT. The occurrence of HAT was independently associated with the need for retransplantation (p < .001) and biliary leakage (p = .045).

CONCLUSION

In pLT, the use of an OM is significantly associated to reduce HAT rate, biliary complications, and graft loss and outweighs the disadvantages of delayed arterial perfusion and prolonged warm ischemia time (WIT).

Outcomes of Right and Left Hepatic Arterial Anastomosis in Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplant

OBJECTIVES

Living donor liver transplant is a complex surgery with well-known complications. Here, we report the use of the right and left hepatic arteries of the recipient for anastomosis and the effects of each procedure on overall outcomes and any associated short-term or long-term biliary complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective observational study with long-term follow-up of 200 patients (100 in the right hepatic artery group and 100 in the left hepatic artery group).

RESULTS

The average donor age was 28.9 years in the left hepatic artery group and 30.9 years in the right hepatic artery group. Most of the donors (60%) were female. Overall, there was 10.5% mortality in the early postoperative period. Among survivors, there were more late strictures in the right hepatic artery group (29.7% vs 22.7%). Bile leak (P = .42), mortality (P = .71), and incidence of late-onset biliary strictures (P = .83) were less common in the left hepatic artery group.

CONCLUSIONS

Left artery anastomosis was found to be technically safe and feasible and did not adversely affect patient outcome compared with right artery anastomosis. Left hepatic artery anastomosis may also reduce the incidence of the biliary complications compared with the right hepatic artery anastomosis.

Analysis of Hepatic Arterial Reconstruction Technique Using Surgical Loupes for Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: Results From a Single Center

BACKGROUND

The reconstruction of the hepatic artery (HA) is the most complex step in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) owing to the artery's smaller diameter and the increased risk for HA-related complications. In this study, we presented our HA anastomosis technique for LDLT, which employed interrupted sutures using magnifying loupes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Since January 2019, we retrospectively analyzed 179 LDLTs that were performed at our center. HA anastomosis was performed under a loupes magnifier (2.5 or 4.5 × ) by the same surgeon.

RESULTS

There were 65 female and 114 male recipients with a mean age of 41.6 ± 21.6 years. Of the recipients, 34 were children. HA thrombosis (HAT) was seen in 3 recipients (1.67%; 1 child and 2 adults) in this series. HAT occurred on the third, sixth, and seventh days after LDLT. HAT was successfully treated with interventional radiologic technique. All recipients are still alive with a patent HA.

CONCLUSION

The use of magnifying surgical loupes and interrupted sutures to perform HA reconstruction is safe, feasible, and yields a low rate of HAT. Also, endovascular treatment can be used safely for treatment of HAT within the first week after LDLT with a high success rate and is not associated with major complications.

Microscope-Assisted Arterial Anastomosis in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes

BACKGROUND

 Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has expanded the availability of liver transplant but has been associated with early technical complications including the devastating complication of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), which has been reported to occur in 14% to 25% of LDLT using standard anastomotic techniques. Microvascular hepatic artery reconstruction (MHAR) has been implemented in an attempt to decrease rates of HAT. The purpose of this study was to review the available literature in LDLT, specifically related to MHAR to determine its impact on rates of posttransplant complications including HAT.

METHODS

 A systematic review was conducted using PubMed/Medline and Web of Science. Case series and reviews describing reports of microscope-assisted hepatic artery anastomosis in adult patients were considered for meta-analysis of factors contributing to HAT.

RESULTS

 In all, 462 abstracts were screened, resulting in 20 studies that were included in the meta-analysis. This analysis included 2,457 patients from eight countries. The pooled rate of HAT was 2.20% with an overall effect size of 0.00906.

CONCLUSION

 Systematic literature review suggests that MHAR during LDLT reduces vascular complications and improves outcomes posttransplant. Microvascular surgeons and transplant surgeons should collaborate when technical challenges such as small vessel size, short donor pedicle, or dissection of the recipient vessel wall are present.

Microsurgical Hepatic Artery Reconstruction in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation for Reduced Arterial Complications

Aberrant donor hepatic artery anatomy or hepatic artery injury during organ procurement or recipient preparation poses a surgical challenge during deceased donor liver transplantation. In this study, we aimed to investigate arterial reconstruction using microvascular techniques during deceased donor liver transplantation and suggest reasonable indications for the microsurgical approach in this setting. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 470 deceased donor liver transplantations performed at our institution between July 2011 and December 2015. Of these, 128 recipients underwent microsurgical hepatic artery reconstruction and 342 underwent reconstruction with surgical loupes. Thirty-two patients (6.8%) experienced hepatic artery-related complications, including hepatic artery thrombosis (n = 8, 1.7%). In the propensity score-matched cohort, the surgical loupe group showed a higher complication rate (P = .782). On multivariate analysis, cold ischemia time (odds ratio, 0.995; 95% confidence interval, 0.9920-0.999; P = .009) and use of aortohepatic conduits (odds ratio, 5.254; 95% confidence interval, 1.878-14.699; P = .002) were independent predictors of arterial complications. The low incidence of hepatic artery complications in this study is likely attributable to the active application of microsurgical techniques. Active application of back-table microsurgical plasty and selective application of microsurgical techniques for main arterial reconstruction may help minimize operative difficulties and arterial complications.

Impact of middle hepatic artery reconstruction after living donor liver transplantation using the left lobe

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to clarify the impact of middle hepatic artery reconstruction on the outcomes of duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using the left lobe.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 258 patients who underwent LDLT using the left lobe, 216 patients who underwent hepatic artery reconstruction and one hepatic duct reconstruction with duct-to-duct interrupted anastomosis were divided into three groups: Group A (n = 123), one arterial stump with left hepatic artery reconstruction; Group B (n = 32), two arterial stumps with only left hepatic artery reconstruction; and Group C (n = 61), two arterial stumps with reconstruction of the left and middle hepatic arteries. The outcomes after LDLT were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

No hepatic artery complications occurred. Group B had a significantly greater incidence of anastomotic biliary stricture than Group C. A multivariate analysis with Cox regression revealed that being in Group B was the only significant independent risk factor for postoperative anastomotic biliary stricture after LDLT.

CONCLUSIONS

Middle and left hepatic artery reconstruction is safe in LDLT and may prevent biliary stricture caused by dual hepatic artery reconstruction when the graft has left and middle hepatic artery stumps.

Comparison of hepatic artery reconstruction using surgical loupe and operating microscope during living donor liver transplantation focusing on the beginner's point

Backgrounds/Aims

Hepatic artery (HA) reconstruction during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been performed by experienced microsurgeons with operative microscope in most centers. However, it takes long time to learn the skills and so, to simplify this procedure, transplant surgeons recently performed this procedure using surgical loupe.

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed outcomes of 237 LDLTs at our institution from January 2012 to October 2016. In group I, HA reconstruction was performed under operative microscope by an experienced microsurgeon and in group II, it was performed using surgical loupe by a transplant surgeon with little experience for arterial anastomosis.

Results

There was no difference in most perioperative outcomes between two groups except mean time required for HA reconstruction (24.2±4.3 vs. 20.9±6.9 minutes, p=0.001). Multivariable regression modeling to adjust for baseline differences showed that the use of surgical loupe was not associated with either HA thrombosis or intraoperative HA revision rate.

Conclusions

HA reconstruction under surgical loupe can be performed simply and yields results as good as with operative microscopy, even when the transplant surgeon has less experience with HA anastomosis.

What happened in 133 consecutive hepatic artery reconstruction in liver transplantation in 1 year?

Background

The immediate challenges during microvascular reconstruction of hepatic artery (HAR) during liver transplantation (LT) can be many. Hence, in order to give a cross sectional view of these problems this study over a period of 1 year, showing our routine practice, was taken up.

Methods

From January 2015 to December 2015, a total of 133 LTs were performed in Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. All hepatic artery (HA) reconstructions were performed by a microvascular surgeon under an operating microscope.

Results

In the 133 patients, one artery was anastomosed in 123 (92.5%) patients, two in 9 (6.8%) patients and three in 1 (0.7%) of the patient. Eleven (8.3%) arteries were less than 2 mm in size (1-1.9 mm). There were intimal dissections (IDs) involving either the donor or the recipient arteries of mild to severe nature in 9 (6.8%) patients. Immediately following graft arterial anastomosis, either there was no flow or an intraoperative hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) was found in nine (7.1%-8 LDLT, 4.8%-1 DDLT) patients. Immediate re-do anastomosis was done in all of these patients who did well in the follow-up. The overall post-operative success rate was 99.2%. One patient (0.8%) developed postoperative HAT due to infection during follow up and died due to sepsis.

Conclusions

Small vessels or HA injury are the frequently encountered problems by a micro vascular surgeon. The other problems could be ID, need to do multiple reconstructions, immediate HAT and ability to re-do the HAR immediately.

Hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation using surgical loupes: Achieving low rate of hepatic arterial thrombosis in 741 consecutive recipients-tips and tricks to overcome the poor hepatic arterial flow

The reconstruction of the hepatic artery (HA) is the most complex step in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) because of the smaller diameter of the artery and the increased risk of HA-related complications. Because of the smaller diameter of the HA, many centers use a microsurgical technique with interrupted sutures for arterial anastomosis. The aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate the outcomes after HA reconstruction performed under magnifying loupes using the "parachute technique." From August 1, 2002 to August 31, 2016, LDLT was performed in 766 recipients. HA reconstruction for the initial 25 LDLT surgeries was performed using a microsurgery technique (era 1). From May 2007 until the end date, HA reconstruction was performed in 741 recipients by a "parachute technique" under surgical loupes (era 2). HA reconstruction was performed using surgical loupes in 737 adults (male:female, 526:211) and 4 pediatric patients (male:female, 3:1). The average diameter of the donor graft HA was 2.8 mm (range, 1-6.5 mm). The most notable factor in this era was the quick HA anastomosis procedure with a mean time of 10 ± 5 minutes (range, 5-30 minutes). In era 2, 9 (1.21%) patients developed hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), whereas 2 patients developed nonthrombotic HA-related complications. Extra-anatomic HA reconstruction was performed in 14 patients due to either primary HA anastomosis failure or a poor caliber recipient HA. The use of magnifying surgical loupes to perform HA reconstruction is safe, feasible, and yields a low incidence of HA-related complications. The "parachute technique" for HA reconstruction can achieve a speedy reconstruction without increasing the risk of HAT. Liver Transplantation 23 887-898 2017 AASLD.

CT evaluation of living liver donor: Can 100-kVp plus iterative reconstruction protocol provide accurate liver volume and vascular anatomy for liver transplantation with reduced radiation and contrast dose?

We evaluated whether donor computed tomography (CT) with a combined technique of lower tube voltage and iterative reconstruction (IR) can provide sufficient preoperative information for liver transplantation.We retrospectively reviewed CT of 113 liver donor candidates. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver was performed on the following protocol: protocol A (n = 70), 120-kVp with filtered back projection (FBP); protocol B (n = 43), 100-kVp with IR. To equalize the background covariates, one-to-one propensity-matched analysis was used. We visually compared the score of the hepatic artery (A-score), portal vein (P-score), and hepatic vein (V-score) of the 2 protocols and quantitatively correlated the graft volume obtained by CT volumetry (graft-CTv) under the 2 protocols with the actual graft weight.In total, 39 protocol-A and protocol-B candidates showed comparable preoperative clinical characteristics with propensity matching. For protocols A and B, the A-score was 3.87 ± 0.73 and 4.51 ± 0.56 (P < .01), the P-score was 4.92 ± 0.27 and 5.0 ± 0.0 (P = .07), and the V-score was 4.23 ± 0.78 and 4.82 ± 0.39 (P < .01), respectively. Correlations between the actual graft weight and graft-CTv of protocols A and B were 0.97 and 0.96, respectively.Liver-donor CT imaging under 100-kVp plus IR protocol provides better visualization for vascular structures than that under 120-kVp plus FBP protocol with comparable accuracy for graft-CTv, while lowering radiation exposure by more than 40% and reducing contrast-medium dose by 20%.

Vascular complications in living donor liver transplantation at a high-volume center: Evolving protocols and trends observed over 10 years

Vascular complications continue to have a devastating effect on liver transplantation recipients, even though their nature, incidence, and outcome might have actually changed with increasing experience and proficiency in high-volume centers. The aim of this study was to analyze the trends observed in vascular complications with changing protocols in adult and pediatric living donor liver transplantation over 10 years in 2 time frames in terms of nature, incidence, and outcome. It is a retrospective analysis of 391 (group 1, January 2006 to December 2010) and 741 (group 2, January 2011 to October 2013) patients. With a minimum follow-up of 2 years, incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) in adults has reduced significantly from 2.2% in group 1 to 0.5% in group 2 (P = 0.02). In group 2, nonsignificantly, more adult patients (75% with HAT) could be salvaged compared with only 25% patients in group 1 (P = 0.12). However, HAT in children had 100% mortality. Incidence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in complicated transplants in 2 eras remained the same (P = 0.2) and so has its mortality. The thrombosis rate of the neo-middle hepatic vein was significantly reduced in group 2 (P = 0.01). The incidence of HAT, particularly in adults, has decreased significantly though PVT has continued to puzzle surgeons in complicated transplants. In high-volume centers, increasing proficiency, technical modifications, early diagnosis, and multimodality of treatment is the key to decrease overall morbidity and mortality due to vascular complications. Liver Transplantation 23 457-464 2017 AASLD.

Hepatic Artery Reconstruction With Autologous Inferior Mesenteric Artery Graft in Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients

INTRODUCTION

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), hepatic arterial continuity is crucial to avoid biliary leakage, biliary stricture, cholangitis, and graft and patient loss. Sometimes there exist factors making anastomosis difficult or even impossible. In these cases, a vascular graft may be needed to bridge the two arteries for revascularization.

METHOD

Medical records of 297 patients who underwent LDLT between June 2000 and July 2016 at the Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit of Dokuz Eylul University Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. Twenty-eight (9%) patients younger than the age of 18 were excluded from the study. The remaining 269 patients were included in the study. We analyzed data of patients who developed hepatic arterial complications during or after LDLT and underwent revascularization using autologous interposed inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) grafts.

RESULTS

In 8 (2.9%) of the 269 patients who underwent LDLT and were included in the study, autologous interposed IMA grafts were used for the hepatic artery revascularization. All of the patients were males. Their mean age was 42 (range, 25-57). The mean duration of follow-up was 83.25 months (range, 3-144 months). One patient developed intraoperative hepatic arterial thrombosis (HAT) after autologus IMA reconstruction and this patient needed retransplantation. No arterial complications developed in the other 7 patients.

CONCLUSION

Autologous interposed IMA graft could be used as an alternative vascular graft in hepatic artery revascularization to provide tension-free hepatic arterial continuity.

Hepatic arterial and portal venous complications after adult and pediatric living donor liver transplantation, risk factors, management and outcome (A retrospective cohort study)

OBJECTIVES

Hepatic arterial (HA) and portal venous (PV) complications of recipients after living donor liver transplantation(LDLT) result in patient loss. The aim of this study was to analyze these complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed HA and/or PV complications in 213 of 222 recipients underwent LDLT in our centre. The overall male/female and adult/pediatric ratios were 183/30 and 186/27 respectively.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of HA and/or PV complications was 19.7% (n = 42), while adult and pediatric complications were 18.3% (n = 39) and 1.4% (n = 3) respectively. However early (<1month) and late (>1month) complications were 9.4% (n = 20) and 10.3% (n = 22) respectively. Individually HA problems (HA stenosis, HA thrombosis, injury and arterial steal syndrome) 15% (n = 32), PV problems (PV thrombosis and PV stenosis) 2.8% (n = 6) and simultaneous HA and PV problems 1.9% (n = 4). 40/42 of complications were managed by angiography (n = 18), surgery (n = 10) or medically (Anticoagulant and/or thrombolytic) (n = 12) where successful treatment occurred in 18 patients. 13/42 (31%) of patients died as a direct result of these complications. Preoperative PVT was significant predictor of these complications in univariate analysis. The 6-month, 1-, 3-, 5- 7- and 10-year survival rates in patients were 65.3%, 61.5%, 55.9%, 55.4%, 54.5% and 54.5% respectively.

CONCLUSION

HA and/or PV complications specially early ones lead to significant poor outcome after LDLT, so proper dealing with the risk factors like pre LT PVT (I.e. More intensive anticoagulation therapy) and the effective management of these complications are mandatory for improving outcome.

Two-step hepatic artery reconstruction for a hepatic artery lacking in length for the use of a microclamp in living donor liver transplantation

•

A graft hepatic artery we experienced too short to rotate a microclamp in living donor liver transplantation.

•

We performed two-step hepatic artery reconstruction.

•

In the first step, we cut the recipient right hepatic artery and used it as an arterial graft.

•

The graft hepatic artery was coapted to the distal stump of the arterial graft without a microclamp.

•

In the second step, the proximal stump of the arterial graft was coapted to the recipient right hepatic artery.

Introduction

We describe successful two-step hepatic artery reconstruction in a patient whose graft site hepatic artery was too short for the use of a microclamp in living donor liver transplantation.

Presentation of case

A 57-year-old woman was diagnosed as having hepatitis C and liver cirrhosis. Her 26-year-old son was the living liver donor. The living donor underwent right lobectomy. The dissected graft hepatic artery was too short for the use of a microclamp. The recipient right hepatic artery was cut and used as an arterial graft. The graft right hepatic artery was sutured to the right hepatic artery of the arterial graft and the graft posterior branch of the right hepatic artery was sutured to the middle hepatic artery of the arterial graft. After reconstruction of the portal vein and hepatic vein was completed, anastomosis was performed between the graft right hepatic artery and right hepatic artery. The patency of the vessels was checked using color Doppler ultrasonography for 1 week postoperatively. No postoperative complications involving blood flow of the hepatic artery were observed.

Discussion

In our case, the recipient hepatic artery was cut and used as an arterial graft. Although the number of anastomotic sites of the hepatic artery increased, we could perform hepatic artery reconstruction safely and easily.

Conclusion

Two-step hepatic artery reconstruction is a useful method in cases where the recipient hepatic artery does not have enough length.

Hepatic arterial and portal venous complications after adult and pediatric living donor liver transplantation, risk factors, management and outcome (A retrospective cohort study)

Objectives

Hepatic arterial (HA) and portal venous (PV) complications of recipients after living donor liver transplantation(LDLT) result in patient loss. The aim of this study was to analyze these complications.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed HA and/or PV complications in 213 of 222 recipients underwent LDLT in our centre. The overall male/female and adult/pediatric ratios were 183/30 and 186/27 respectively.

Results

The overall incidence of HA and/or PV complications was 19.7% (n = 42), while adult and pediatric complications were 18.3% (n = 39) and 1.4% (n = 3) respectively. However early (<1month) and late (>1month) complications were 9.4% (n = 20) and 10.3% (n = 22) respectively. Individually HA problems (HA stenosis, HA thrombosis, injury and arterial steal syndrome) 15% (n = 32), PV problems (PV thrombosis and PV stenosis) 2.8% (n = 6) and simultaneous HA and PV problems 1.9% (n = 4). 40/42 of complications were managed by angiography (n = 18), surgery (n = 10) or medically (Anticoagulant and/or thrombolytic) (n = 12) where successful treatment occurred in 18 patients. 13/42 (31%) of patients died as a direct result of these complications. Preoperative PVT was significant predictor of these complications in univariate analysis. The 6-month, 1-, 3-, 5- 7- and 10-year survival rates in patients were 65.3%, 61.5%, 55.9%, 55.4%, 54.5% and 54.5% respectively.

Conclusion

HA and/or PV complications specially early ones lead to significant poor outcome after LDLT, so proper dealing with the risk factors like pre LT PVT (I.e. More intensive anticoagulation therapy) and the effective management of these complications are mandatory for improving outcome.

•

Preoperative PVT was significant predictor of HA and/or PV complications.

•

HA and/or PV complications especially early ones lead to significant poor outcome.

•

Proper dealing with the risk factors like pre LT PVT improves outcome.

•

The effective management of these complications is mandatory for improving outcome.

Management of early hepatic artery occlusion after liver transplantation with failed rescue

Hepatic artery thrombosis is a serious complication after liver transplantation which often results in biliary complications, early graft loss, and patient death. It is generally thought that early hepatic artery thrombosis without urgent re-vascularization or re-transplantation almost always leads to mortality, especially if the hepatic artery thrombosis occurs within a few days after transplantation. This series presents 3 cases of early hepatic artery thrombosis after living donor liver transplantation, in which surgical or endovascular attempts at arterial re-vascularization failed. Unexpectedly, these 3 patients survived with acceptable graft function after 32 mo, 11 mo, and 4 mo follow-up, respectively. The literatures on factors affecting this devastating complication were reviewed from an anatomical perspective. The collective evidence from survivors indicated that modified nonsurgical management after liver transplantation with failed revascularization may be sufficient to prevent mortality from early hepatic artery occlusion. Re-transplantation may be reserved for selected patients with unrecovered graft function.

Division of surgeon workload in pancreaticoduodenectomy: striving to decrease post-operative pancreatic fistula

BACKGROUND

Many studies have reported factors affecting pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), but there have been few reports on surgeon workload and post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF). This study was conducted to explore whether a surgeon's workload during PD impacts the occurrence of POPF.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 270 consecutive patients who underwent PD between January 2008 and June 2013 by a single experienced surgeon. These patients were divided into those who underwent PD entirely by a single operator (group 1) and those who received reconstructions by other operators (group 2). Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy was performed on all patients. The International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula criteria were used to define POPF.

RESULTS

There were 157 patients (58.1%) in group 1 and 113 patients (41.9%) in group 2. The post-operative morbidity rate was comparable between the two groups (55.4% versus 52.2%; P = 0.603), but the clinical pancreatic fistula (grade B/C) rate was significantly different (10.8% versus 2.7%; P = 0.011). The overall post-operative mortality was one patient (0.4%). Significant associations were found between clinical pancreatic fistulas and soft pancreas texture (P = 0.021), preoperative serum albumin level ≤3.5 g/dL (P = 0.012), other pathology besides pancreatic cancer (P = 0.027) and a single-operator procedure (P = 0.019). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a single operator (odds ratio: 4.2, P = 0.029) was a significant predictive risk factor for clinically relevant POPF.

CONCLUSION

Dividing the surgeon's workload in PD is associated with lower rates of POPF.

Hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: risk factor analysis of complication and a role of MDCT scan for detecting anastomotic stricture

BACKGROUND

In partial liver transplantation, reconstruction of the hepatic artery is technically highly demanding and the incidence of arterial complications is high. We attempted to identify the risk factors for anastomotic complications after hepatic artery reconstruction and examined the role of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in the evaluation of the reconstructed hepatic artery in liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

A total of 109 adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantations (LDLT) were performed at our institute between 1999 and July 2011. Hepatic artery reconstruction was performed under a surgical microscope (MS group, n = 84), until we began to adopt surgical loupes (4.5×) for arterial reconstructions in all cases after January 2009 (SL group, n = 25). A dynamic MDCT study was prospectively carried out on postoperative days 7, 14, and 28, and at postoperative month 3, 6, and 12 after April 2005 (n = 60).

RESULTS

There were no cases of hepatic artery thrombosis and six cases (5.5 %) of interventional radiology-confirmed hepatic artery stenosis (HAS). Risk factor analysis for HAS showed that ABO-incompatible LDLT was associated with HAS. Use of surgical loupes provided superior results as compared to anastomosis under a surgical microscope, and it also provided the advantage of reduced operative time. The MDCT procedure was useful for detecting HAS; however, the false positive rate was relatively high until 3 months after the LDLT (100 % sensitivity and 72.8 % specificity at 3 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic arterial anastomosis using surgical loupes tended to be time-saving and to yield similar or better results than traditional microscope-anastomosis. The use of MDCT aided the diagnosis of HAS, although the substantial false positive rate should be borne in mind in clinical practice.

Experiences of microsurgical reconstruction for variant hepatic artery in living donor liver transplantation

There is an emergent need for improving the microsurgical technique of variant arterial anastomosis to reduce the often seen surgery-related complications. We describe in this article our experience in improving this technique, in 73 living donor liver grafts (64 right lobes, 9 left lobes) in patients with end-stage liver disease during living donor liver transplantation. The hepatic arteries were evaluated preoperatively with computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography. In this series, 13 grafts (17.80 %) with variant hepatic artery were conducted arterioplasty on a back-table under a loupe or a high-power microscope, which included one recipient in situ interposition vessel graft of recipient proper hepatic artery for artery reconstruction. The back-table reconstruction time was 16 ± 5.6 min. No arterial thrombosis was found in these cases during the 6-month postoperative follow-up. On the basis of our experience, we suggest that back-table microsurgical plasty for graft with arterial variation should be applied to minimize operative difficulties and to avoid arterial complications in living donor liver transplantation.

Hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: running suture under surgical loupes by cardiovascular surgeons in 180 recipients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate the outcomes of hepatic artery (HA) reconstruction by cardiovascular surgeons in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A-A LDLT).

METHODS

From April 2007 to April 2011, 187 recipients underwent A-A LDLT. After excluding seven ABO-incompatible transplant recipients, we reviewed the courses of 180 patients including 125 men and 55 women of mean age 52.5±9.2 years (range=23-71). One hundred seventy-seven patients received right-lobe grafts with inclusion of middle hepatic vein (MHV); two, right-lobe grafts without MHV; and one, left-lobe graft. A continuous, single-stitch, running suture with the parachute technique was used for HA reconstruction. The anastomosis was performed by cardiovascular surgeons employing surgical loupes with 4.5× magnification.

RESULTS

The mean time for an arterial reconstruction was 10.7±4.0 minutes (median=10, range=4-30). Hepatic arterial thrombosis (HAT) was encountered in 3 (1.66%) patients. One HAT that developed on postoperative day 1 was successfully rescued by the intra-arterial infusion of urokinase. Another patient required reoperation due to a redundant kinked HA. A third HAT patient underwent successful retransplantation with a cadaveric graft on postoperative day 6. In our series, no delayed HAT was detected and no recipient deaths were related to HAT.

CONCLUSION

HA reconstruction with a running suture under surgical loupes is a feasible technique in A-A LDLT. A speedy reconstruction can be performed by an experienced cardiovascular surgeon with a low incidence of HAT.

Left lobe living donor liver transplantation in adults

Adult left lobe (LL) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has not generally been recognized as a feasible procedure because of the problem of graft size. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility and short- and long-term results of adult LL LDLT in comparison with right lobe (RL) LDLT. Data on 200 consecutive LL LDLTs, including five retransplants, were retrospectively compared with those of 112 RL LDLTs, in terms of survival, complications and donor morbidity. The mean graft weight to standard volume ratio of LL grafts was 38.7% whereas that of RL grafts was 47.6% (p < 0.0001). The 1-, 5- and 10-year patient survival rates of LL LDLT were 85.6%, 77.9% and 69.5%, respectively, which were comparable to those of RL LDLT (89.8%, 71.3% and 70.7%, respectively). The incidence of small-for-size syndrome was higher in LL LDLT (19.5%) than in RL LDLT (7.1%) (p < 0.01). The overall donor morbidity rates were comparable between LL (36.0%) and RL (34.8%), whereas postoperative liver function tests and hospital stay were significantly better (p < 0.0001) in LL donors. In conclusion, adult LL LDLT has comparable outcomes to that of RL LDLT. LL LDLT is viable and is the first choice in adult LDLT.

Versatility of right gastroepiploic and gastroduodenal arteries for arterial reconstruction in adult living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

In cases where there is severe intimal dissection in the recipient hepatic artery (HA), or if the HA has been used already and additional operations are needed due to graft rejection or arterial occlusion, an alternative is necessary. In the present study, we have reported the feasibility of using the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) and gastroduodenal artery (GDA) in various situations where the HA is not a feasible option.

METHODS

Among 463 patients who underwent primary adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation from January 2002 to July 2010, eight subjects required alternative vessels. Four recipients displayed severe intimal injury associated with previous transarterial chemoembolization (TACE); two, required a salvage operation due to hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT); and two, retransplantations due to chronic rejection. The RGEA was used in five and the GDA in three patients.

RESULTS

Postoperative Doppler ultrasonography and three-dimensional computed tomography showed patent arterial flow in all patients. However, HAT recurred in one patient who underwent a salvage operation with the RGEA; she died 2 months later. Two other patients died due to wound infection and respiratory failure within 3 months despite intact hepatic arterial flow. Four patients had no further complications during follow-up (mean = 33 months).

CONCLUSION

Although there was a discrepancy in the diameter of the HA and the RGEA (or GDA), there was no problem with mobilization and microanastomosis. We therefore believe that these vessels can be good alternatives when the hepatic artery is unavailable.

Hepatic artery reconstruction and successful management of its complications in living donor liver transplantation using a right lobe

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to improve the techniques of hepatic artery (HA) reconstruction and to properly manage arterial complications after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

Prospectively collected data collected from 371 patients who underwent adult LDLT using a right lobe from January 2000 to August 2009 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 17 patients (4.6%, 17/371) with double HA stumps in the graft, 12 patients (70.6%) received dual HA reconstruction. HA complications were composed of thrombosis (n = 6), pseudoaneurysm (n = 2), and stenosis (n = 4), showing 3.2% (12/371) of incidence. In patients with HA thrombosis, whereas operative thrombectomies with re-anastomosis rescued all the grafts in early attack (n = 3, ≤1 wk), angiographic thrombolysis successfully reestablished the flow in patients with late attack (n = 3, >1 wk). In all patients with HA complications, except for one, all of our treatment modalities - operation and angiographic intervention - resulted in successful rescue of grafts and no patient received re-transplantation because of HA complications.

CONCLUSION

Prompt diagnosis of HA complications by serial post-operative Doppler ultrasound and corresponding treatment strategies, including operative and radiological intervention, can rescue both grafts and patients without necessitating re-transplantation.

Extra-anatomical hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: can this procedure save hepatic grafts?

Graft hepatic arteries (HAs) are usually reconstructed with a recipient HA branch (anatomical HA reconstruction) in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Surgeons often encounter difficulties in reconstructing HAs, particularly when a recipient artery other than an HA branch must be used; this is known as extra-anatomical HA reconstruction. The outcomes of LDLT recipients with extra-anatomical HA reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed. Between October 1996 and October 2009, we performed primary LDLT 335 times, re-LDLT 8 times, and HA re-reconstruction 5 times for patients with HA complications. Thirty-three extra-anatomical HA reconstructions were performed in 22 patients with primary LDLT (6.6%), 4 patients with re-LDLT (50%), and 4 patients with HA re-reconstructions for HA complications (80%). In extra-anatomical HA reconstructions, we used 12 right gastroepiploic arteries, 6 right gastric arteries, 5 gastroduodenal arteries, 2 left gastric arteries, 2 splenic arteries, 2 cystic arteries, and 4 interposition grafts as recipient inflow arteries. Only 1 HA-related complication, the formation of an aneurysm, occurred after extra-anatomical HA reconstruction. The overall graft and patient survival probabilities after primary LDLT with extra-anatomical HA reconstruction were comparable to those after LDLT with anatomical HA reconstruction, although approximately half of the patients with extra-anatomical HA reconstruction suffered anastomotic biliary strictures. Therefore, extra-anatomical HA reconstruction can be safely performed through the proper selection of recipient arteries and the use of interposition grafts. These procedures can save hepatic grafts, even when recipient HAs cannot be used as inflow arteries.

Microsurgical reconstruction of hepatic artery in A-A LDLT: 124 consecutive cases without HAT

AIM

To retrospectively investigate microsurgical hepatic artery (HA) reconstruction and management of hepatic thrombosis in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A-A LDLT).

METHODS

From January 2001 to September 2009, 182 recipients with end-stage liver disease underwent A-A LDLT. Ten of these patients received dual grafts. The 157 men and 25 women had an age range of 18 to 68 years (mean age, 42 years). Microsurgical techniques and running sutures with back-wall first techniques were performed in all arterial reconstructions under surgical loupes (3.5 x) by a group of vascular surgeons. Intimal dissections were resolved by interposition of the great saphenous vein (GSV) between the donor right hepatic artery (RHA) and recipient common HA (3 cases) or abdominal aorta (AA) (2 cases), by interposition of cryopreserved iliac vessels between the donor RHA and recipient AA (2 cases).

RESULTS

In the 58 incipient patients in this series, hepatic arterial thrombosis (HAT) was encountered in 4 patients, and was not observed in 124 consecutive cases (total 192 grafts, major incidence, 2.08%). All cases of HAT were suspected by routine color Doppler ultrasonographic examination and confirmed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound and hepatic angiography. Of these cases of HAT, two occurred on the 1st and 7th d, respectively, following A-A LDLT, and were immediately revascularized with GSV between the graft and recipient AA. HAT in one patient occurred on the 46th postoperative day with no symptoms, and the remaining case of HAT occurred on the 3rd d following A-A LDLT, and was cured by thrombolytic therapy combined with an anticoagulant but died of multiorgan failure on the 36th d after A-A LDLT. No deaths were related to HAT.

CONCLUSION

Applying microsurgical techniques and selecting an appropriate anastomotic artery for HA reconstruction are crucial in reducing the high risk of HAT during A-A LDLT.

Administration of dalteparin based on the activated clotting time for prophylaxis of hepatic vessel thrombosis in living donor liver transplantation

Beginning in 2004, dalteparin doses based on activated clotting time (ACT) were administered for hepatic vessel thrombosis prophylaxis in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We verified the feasibility of this new therapy by comparing it with the previous one. From 1993 through 2008, 42 metabolic liver patients who underwent LDLT were divided into two groups. Group A (1993-2003, n = 32) was administered a fixed dalteparin dose and a large amount of fresh frozen plasma (FFP); Group B (2004-2008, n = 10) was administered an appropriate dosage of dalteparin to maintain the ACT levels from 140 to 150 seconds and a small amount of FFP. Group B was administered a lesser amount of FFP and more dalteparin. This resulted in longer activated partial thromboplastin time, lower fibrinogen degradation products D-dimer, and lower aspartate aminotransferase levels compared to group A; all differences were significant. Group B showed neither thrombotic nor hemorrhagic complications. Anticoagulation therapy comprising adjustment of the dalteparin dose based on ACT reduces thrombotic complications without increasing hemorrhagic complications. ACT measurement is a simple, reliable method for bedside monitoring of dalteparin anticoagulant effects for LDLT.

Hepatic artery reconstruction in pediatric living donor liver transplantation under 10 kg, without microscope use

Arterial reconstructions are pivotal, particularly in pediatric LDLT. We describe microsurgical reconstruction technique with 6x loupes and the clinical course of the first 23 less than 10 kg recipients in an initial LDLT program at a developing country. From March 2002 to October 2008, 286 liver transplantation were performed in 279 patients at our unit. There were 73 children and 206 adults. Among the children, 23 weighing less than 10 kg were recipients from living donors. Arterial reconstructions were with end-to-end interrupted suture using a 6x magnification loupe, according to the untied suture technique. All patients were prospectively followed by color Doppler ultrasound protocol. In our initial experience there were no arterial complications. With mean 24 months of follow-up, 19 patients (82%) are alive with good graft function. Hepatic artery in LDLT can be safely reconstructed with microsurgical techniques without microscope using, with 6x loupe magnification, and can achieve good results in patients under 10 kg.

Endovascular treatment of hepatic artery thrombosis following liver transplantation

Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is the most frequent vascular complication following orthotopic liver transplantation. Urgent retransplantation has been considered as the mainstay therapy. Surgical revascularization is an effective alternative in asymptomatic patients. Endovascular therapies including intra-arterial thrombolysis, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), and stent placement have shown encouraging results in recent years; however, their use remains controversial because of potential risk of hemorrhage. Until June 2009, 69 cases were published in 16 reports describing therapeutic potential of endovascular modalities. Interventions were performed as early as within 4 h to as late as 120 days in patients ranging from 4 months to 64 years of age. Majority of published reports suggested the use of urokinase. Thrombolysis was successful in 47 out of 69 (68%) patients. Bleeding was the most common complication including fatal intra-abdominal hemorrhage in three patients. Twenty-nine out of 47 (62%) patients underwent further intervention in the form of PTA, stenting, or both. The follow-up patency ranged from 1 month to 26 months. In conclusion, whenever possible, efforts should be made to rescue the liver grafts through urgent revascularization (surgical and/or endovascular) depending on patient's condition and interventional expertise at the transplant center; reserving the option of retransplantation for failure, complications, and cases with severe clinical symptoms or allograft dysfunction.

Intimal dissection of the hepatic artery following transarterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: an intraoperative problem in adult living donor liver transplantation

The objective of this study was to describe the relationship between intimal dissection (ID) in the recipient hepatic artery (HA) and transarterial embolization (TAE) and highlight the reconstructive methods for the different types of ID encountered in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Fifty-four patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent LDLT. ID was classified as mild, moderate, or severe, and this classification was based on the extent of intimal injury. Mild, moderate, or severe ID were defined as ID that was less than one-quarter of the circumference of the HA, had reached one-half of the circumference of the HA, or was more than one-half of the circumference of the HA or involved the entire vessel wall, respectively. The reconstructive methods were based on the severity of ID encountered. Forty patients underwent TAE before LDLT, and 23 of these patients (57.5%) had ID. Nine patients had mild ID, 6 had moderate ID, and 8 had severe ID. In the 14 patients who did not undergo TAE, 4 had ID (28.6%; 3 mild and 1 severe). The other 10 patients (71.4%) had normal HA. In mild and moderate ID, the native HA was used after trimming of the HA until a healthy segment was encountered. In severe ID, the HA was reconstructed with alternative vessels. Two HA thromboses occurred postoperatively. TAE increased the risk of developing ID 2-fold. There was no graft loss or mortality in this series due to HA complications. In conclusion, ID of the HA is associated with pretransplant TAE among hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing LDLT. Intraoperative recognition of this complication and trimming until good vessel quality is encountered or using alternative vessels are important.

Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatectomy

Laparoscopic liver surgery is becoming more popular, and many high-volume liver centers are now gaining expertise in this area. Laparoscopic left lateral hepatectomy (LLLH) is a standardized and anatomically well-defined resection and may transform into a primarily laparoscopic procedure for cancer surgery or living donor hepatectomy for transplantation. Five case-control series were identified comparing a total of 167 cases (86 cases of LLLH plus 81 cases of open left lateral hepatectomy). Groups were matched by age and sex, with broadly similar indications for surgery and resection techniques. LLLH is associated with shorter hospital stays and less blood loss without compromising the margin status or increasing complication rates. Donors of LLLH grafts did not have higher graft-related morbidity. Prospective studies are required to define the safety in terms of disease-free and overall survival in this new avenue in laparoscopic liver surgery.

Early hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: a systematic review of the incidence, outcome and risk factors

To clarify inconsistencies in the literature we performed a systematic review to identify the incidence, risk factors and outcome of early hepatic artery thrombosis (eHAT) after liver transplantation. We searched studies identified from databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index) and references of identified studies. Seventy-one studies out of 999 screened abstracts were eligible for this systematic review. The incidence of eHAT was 4.4% (843/21, 822); in children 8.3% and 2.9% in adults (p < 0.001). Doppler ultrasound screening (DUS) protocols varied from 'no routine' to 'three times a day.' The median time to detection was at day seven. The overall retransplantation rate was 53.1% and was higher in children (61.9%) than in adults (50%, p < 0.03). The overall mortality rate of patients with eHAT was 33.3% (range: 0-80%). Mortality in adults (34.3%) was higher than in children (25%, p < 0.03). The reported risk factors for eHAT were, cytomegalovirus mismatch (seropositive donor liver in seronegative recipient), retransplantation, arterial conduits, prolonged operation time, low recipient weight, variant arterial anatomy, and low volume transplantation centers. eHAT is associated with significant graft loss and mortality. Uniform definitions of eHAT and uniform treatment modalities are obligatory to confirm these results and to obtain a better understanding of this disastrous complication.

Hepatic artery reconstruction with inferior mesenteric vein graft in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

We report a transplant of the left lateral liver segments with two arteries for a pediatric recipient from a live donor. A six-month-old female patient was diagnosed with liver cirrhosis secondary to biliary atresia and scheduled for LDLT (father as donor). Left lateral hepatectomy was performed at the donor site. The dissection of the left HA, which divided immediately after its origin, showed two branches for segments II and III. The artery for segment III was anastomosed to the recipient HA. The artery for segment II was too short for direct anastomosis with the gastroduodenal artery. After an unsuccessful attempt to use of the recipient's saphenous vein, the recipient's IMV was used as an interposition graft. No post-operative complications were observed. The outcome of this case demonstrates that left lateral segments with two arteries can be successfully used if proper surgical techniques are applied. From this experience we can recommend the IMV as an alternative to the saphenous vein for an interposition graft.

Intimal dissection of the hepatic artery after thrombectomy as a cause of graft loss in pediatric living-related liver transplantation

HAT is the main cause of graft loss in pediatric living-related LTx. Revascularization of the graft by thrombectomy and re-anastomosis has been reported to be effective for graft salvage in cases of HAT and should be attempted when potential donors are not available for emergency re-transplantation. Immediate complications secondary to revascularization attempts in cases of HAT are not described. Late complications are mainly related to biliary tree ischemia. We report a case of child who experienced intimal hepatic artery dissection, which extended into intra-hepatic branches of the artery after a thrombectomy with a Fogarty balloon catheter in an attempt to restore arterial flow after HAT. This complication led to acute deterioration of the graft and the need for emergency re-transplantation.

Microsurgical hepatic artery reconstruction during living-donor liver transplantation by using head-mounted surgical binocular system

We have described our experience with arterial reconstruction during living-donor liver transplantation by using Varioscope AF3--a head-mounted surgical binocular system with automatic focusing and continuous zoom magnification from 3.6x to 7.2x. From July 1996 to December 2006, 91 grafts were implanted in 89 living-donor liver transplantation recipients, including two that required retransplantation. For microsurgical reconstruction of the graft hepatic artery, a conventional operating microscope was used in the first 10 transplants and Varioscope, in the subsequent 81. The time required to complete arterial reconstruction while using a conventional operating microscope and Varioscope was 78.6 +/- 44.6 min and 35.5 +/- 15.5 min, respectively. No arterial complications, including hepatic artery thrombosis, occurred in any of the 89 patients during the observation period. In living-donor liver transplantation, successful hepatic artery reconstruction can be safely carried out using Varioscope.