Efficacy of esmolol as a myocardial protective agent during continuous retrograde blood cardioplegia

Cardioplegia between Evolution and Revolution: From Depolarized to Polarized Cardiac Arrest in Adult Cardiac Surgery

Despite current advances in perioperative care, intraoperative myocardial protection during cardiac surgery has not kept the same pace. High potassium cardioplegic solutions were introduced in the 1950s, and in the early 1960s they were soon recognized as harmful. Since that time, surgeons have minimized many of the adverse effects by lowering the temperature of the heart, lowering K⁺ concentration, reducing contact K⁺ time, changing the vehicle from a crystalloid solution to whole-blood, adding many pharmacological protectants and modifying reperfusion conditions. Despite these attempts, high potassium remains a suboptimalway to arrest the heart. We briefly review the historical advances and failures of finding alternatives to high potassium, the drawbacks of a prolonged depolarized membrane, altered Ca²⁺ intracellular circuits and heterogeneity in atrial-ventricular K⁺ repolarization during reanimation. Many of these untoward effects may be alleviated by a polarized membrane, and we will discuss the basic science and clinical experience from a number of institutions trialling different alternatives, and our institution with a non-depolarizing adenosine, lidocaine and magnesium (ALM) cardioplegia. The future of polarized arrest is an exciting one and may play an important role in treating the next generation of patients who are older, and sicker with multiple comorbidities and require more complex operations with prolonged cross-clamping times.

Cardioprotection with esmolol-based cardioplegia for non-infarcted and infarcted rat hearts

OBJECTIVES

Esmolol-based cardioplegic arrest offers better cardioprotection than crystalloid cardioplegia but has been compared experimentally with blood cardioplegia only once. We investigated the influence of esmolol crystalloid cardioplegia (ECCP), esmolol blood cardioplegia (EBCP) and Calafiore blood cardioplegia (Cala) on cardiac function, metabolism and infarct size in non-infarcted and infarcted isolated rat hearts.

METHODS

Two studies were performed: (i) the hearts were subjected to a 90-min cardioplegic arrest with ECCP, EBCP or Cala and (ii) a regional myocardial infarction was created 30 min before a 90-min cardioplegic arrest. Left ventricular peak developed pressure (LVpdP), velocity of contractility (dLVP/dtmax), velocity of relaxation over time (dLVP/dtmin), heart rate and coronary flow were recorded. In addition, the metabolic parameters were analysed. The infarct size was determined by planimetry, and the myocardial damage was determined by electron microscopy.

RESULTS

In non-infarcted hearts, cardiac function was better preserved with ECCP than with EBCP or Cala relative to baseline values (LVpdP: 100 ± 28% vs 86 ± 11% vs 57 ± 7%; P = 0.002). Infarcted hearts showed similar haemodynamic recovery for ECCP, EBCP and Cala (LVpdP: 85 ± 46% vs 89 ± 55% vs 56 ± 26%; P = 0.30). The lactate production with EBCP was lower than with ECCP (0.6 ± 0.7 vs 1.4 ± 0.5 μmol/min; P = 0.017). The myocardial infarct size and (ECCP vs EBCP vs Cala: 16 ± 7% vs 15 ± 9% vs 24 ± 13%; P = 0.21) the ultrastructural preservation was similar in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In non-infarcted rat hearts, esmolol-based cardioplegia, particularly ECCP, offers better myocardial protection than Calafiore. After an acute myocardial infarction, cardioprotection with esmolol-based cardioplegia is similar to that with Calafiore.

Esmolol in Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the administration of the ultra-short-acting β-blocker esmolol in cardiac surgery could have a cardioprotective effect that translates into improved postoperative outcomes.

DESIGN

Single-center, double-blinded, parallel-group randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

A tertiary care referral center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with preoperative evidence of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter >60 mm and/or left ventricular ejection fraction <50%.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were assigned randomly to receive either esmolol (1 mg/kg as a bolus before aortic cross-clamping and 2 mg/kg mixed in the cardioplegia solution) or placebo in a 1:1 allocation ratio.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary composite endpoint of prolonged intensive care unit stay and/or in-hospital mortality occurred in 36/98 patients (36%) in the placebo group versus 27/102 patients (27%) in the esmolol group (p = 0.13). In the esmolol group, a reduction in the maximum inotropic score during the first 24 postoperative hours was observed (10 [interquartile range 5-15] v 7 [interquartile range 5-10.5]; p = 0.04), as well as a trend toward a reduction in postoperative low-cardiac-output syndrome (13/98 v 6/102; p = 0.08) and the rate of hospital admission at one year (26/95 v 16/96; p = 0.08). A trend toward an increase in the number of patients with ejection fraction ≥60% at hospital discharge also was observed (4/95 v 11/92; p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present trial, esmolol as a cardioplegia adjuvant enhanced postoperative cardiac performance but did not reduce a composite endpoint of prolonged intensive care unit stay and/or mortality.

Time Window Is Important for Adenosine Preventing Cold-induced Injury to the Endothelium

Cold cardioplegia is used to induce heart arrest during cardiac surgery. However, endothelial function may be compromised after this procedure. Accordingly, interventions such as adenosine, that mimic the effects of preconditioning, may minimize endothelial injury. Herein, we investigated whether adenosine prevents cold-induced injury to the endothelium. Cultured human cardiac microvascular endothelial cells were treated with adenosine for different durations. Phosphorylation and expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), p38MAPK, ERK1/2, and p70S6K6 were measured along with nitric oxide (NO) production using diaminofluorescein-2 diacetate (DAF-2DA) probe. Cold-induced injury by hypothermia to 4°C for 45 minutes to mimic conditions of cold cardioplegia during open heart surgery was induced in human cardiac microvascular endothelial cells. Under basal conditions, adenosine stimulated NO production, eNOS phosphorylation at serine 1177 from 5 minutes to 4 hours and inhibited eNOS phosphorylation at threonine 495 from 5 minutes to 6 hours, but increased phosphorylation of ERK1/2, p38MAPK, and p70S6K only after exposure for 5 minutes. Cold-induced injury inhibited NO production and the phosphorylation of the different enzymes. Importantly, adenosine prevented these effects of hypothermic injury. Our data demonstrated that adenosine prevents hypothermic injury to the endothelium by activating ERK1/2, eNOS, p70S6K, and p38MAPK signaling pathways at early time points. These findings also indicated that 5 minutes after administration of adenosine or release of adenosine is an important time window for cardioprotection during cardiac surgery.

A pilot study of perioperative esmolol for myocardial protection during on-pump cardiac surgery

The protective effects of preprocedural esmolol on myocardial injury and hemodynamics have not, to date, been investigated in patients who were scheduled for cardiac surgeries under a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). A pilot randomized controlled trial was performed at The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (Dalian, China). Patients scheduled for elective open-heart surgeries under CBP were included, and were randomized to esmolol and control groups. For patients in the esmolol groups, intravenous esmolol (70 µg/kg/min) was administered at the time of incision until CPB was performed. For patients assigned to the control group, equal volumes of 0.9% saline were administered. Markers of myocardial injury and hemodynamic parameters were observed until 12 h post surgery. A total of 24 patients were included in the present study. No significant differences in hemodynamic parameters, including the central venous pressure and heart rate, were detected between patients in the two groups during the perioperative period or within the first 12 h post-surgery (P>0.05), except for the mean arterial pressure, which was higher in the esmolol group compared with the control group at 5 and 12 h post-surgery (P<0.05). However, the serum level of cardiac troponin I was higher in patients of the control group compared with those of the esmolol group during the preoperative period (P<0.05). Although creatinine kinase was significantly different at T2 between the two groups, its MB isoenzyme was not significantly different between the groups (P>0.05). In addition, administration of esmolol was not associated with an increased risk for severe complications and adverse events in these patients. In conclusion, preoperative esmolol may be an effective and safe measure of myocardial protection for patients who undergo elective cardiac surgeries under CBP.

Myocardial protection in cardiac surgery: a historical review from the beginning to the current topics

Myocardial protection has become an essential adjunctive measure in cardiac surgery for a couple of decades, because since the 1950s, the methods of cardioprotection (cardioplegic solutions and related procedures) have been improved by the mechanism of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion-induced damage being unveiled through the untiring efforts of researchers and clinicians. The concept of myocardial protection in cardiac surgery was proposed along with introduction of hypothermic crystalloid potassium cardioplegia in the beginning and has been diversified by pharmacological additives, blood cardioplegia, temperature modulation (warm; tepid), retrograde cardioplegia, controlled reperfusion, integrated cardioplegia, and pre-and postconditioning. This historical review summarized experimental and clinical studies dealing with the methods and results of myocardial protection in cardiac surgery, introducing the newly developed concepts for the last decade and the current topics.

Protective effect of esmolol on myocardial ischemic injury during open heart surgery in children

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy of esmolol in protecting the myocardium from ischemia during pediatric cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND

Esmolol, an ultra-short acting beta 1-adrenoceptor blocker, reduces myocardial injury in adult cardiac operations. However, this technique is rarely used in pediatric cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Thirty children with ventricular septal defect were randomly allocated to the esmolol group and the control group. Patients received intravenous esmolol (0.05 mg·kg(-1) ·min(-1) after tracheal intubation, 0.3 mg·kg(-1) ·min(-1) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and 0.03-0.05 mg·kg(-1) ·min(-1) until the end of surgery) or placebo, respectively.

RESULTS

Plasma levels of creatine kinase-MB, cardiac troponin I in the esmolol group 2 min after completion of CPB, at the end of surgery, 4 h after surgery, and the first postoperative day were significantly lower than those in the control group. Values of heart rate 10 min after induction, 2 min before institution of CPB, 2 min after completion of CPB, and at the end of surgery were significantly lower in the esmolol group; however, mean arterial pressure, CPB time, cross-clamp time, and the rate of heart spontaneous rebeating were not statistically different between two groups. Cumulative postoperative dosage of dopamine in the esmolol group (100.1 ± 53.1 mg) was significantly less than that in the control group (171.4 ± 92.1 mg).

CONCLUSIONS

Esmolol can protect the myocardium from ischemic injury during CPB in children and significantly reduce the use of inotropic drug.

Myocardial preservation: controlled reperfusion

Reperfusion injury after reestablishing coronary flow by releasing the aortic cross clamp after cardiac surgery with cardioplegic arrest causes myocardial damage and even death. Attenuation of this reperfusion response by controlling the biochemical and physical environment can avoid morbidity and mortality. Use of a warm reperfusate with addition of drugs that are known to decrease reperfusion injury with manipulation of coronary vascular resistance and the physical parameters of the reperfusion environment helps the heart to reestablish coronary perfusion while decreasing the harm produced by the period of ischemia that occurs during cardiac surgery with intermittent cardioplegic arrest.

Effect of short-acting beta blocker on the cardiac recovery after cardiopulmonary bypass

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of beta blocker on cardiac recovery and rhythm during cardiac surgeries. Sixty surgical rheumatic heart disease patients were received esmolol 1 mg/kg or the same volume of saline prior to removal of the aortic clamp. The incidence of cardiac automatic re-beat, ventricular fibrillation after reperfusion, the heart rate after steady re-beat, vasoactive drug use during weaning from bypass, the posterior parallel time and total bypass time were decreased by esmolol treatment.

IN CONCLUSION

Esmolol has a positive effect on the cardiac recovery in cardiopulmonary bypass surgeries.

Esmolol cardioplegia: the cellular mechanism of diastolic arrest

AIMS

Esmolol, an ultra-short-acting beta-blocker, acts as a cardioplegic agent at millimolar concentrations. We investigated the mechanism by which esmolol induces diastolic ventricular arrest.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In unpaced Langendorff-perfused rat hearts, esmolol (0.03-3 mmol/L) had a profound negative inotropic effect resulting in diastolic arrest at 1 mmol/L and above. This inhibition of contraction was maintained during ventricular pacing. At 3 mmol/L, esmolol also abolished action potential conduction. To determine the cellular mechanism for the negative inotropism, we measured contraction (sarcomere shortening) and the calcium transient (fura-2 fluorescence ratio; Ca(tr)) in electrically-stimulated rat ventricular myocytes at 23 and 34 degrees C. The decrease in contraction (by 72% at 23 degrees C, from 0.16 +/- 0.01 to 0.04 +/- 0.01 microm, P < 0.001) was similar to that of isolated hearts and was caused by a large decrease in Ca(tr) (from 0.13 +/- 0.02 to 0.07 +/- 0.02, P < 0.001). There was no additional effect on myofilament Ca(2+) sensitivity. Esmolol's effects on contraction and Ca(tr) were not shared or altered by the beta-blocker, atenolol (1 mmol/L). Sarcoplasmic reticulum inhibition with thapsigargin did not alter the inhibitory effects of esmolol. Whole-cell voltage-clamp experiments revealed that esmolol inhibited the L-type calcium current (I(Ca,L)) and the fast sodium current (I(Na)), with IC(50) values of 0.45 +/- 0.05 and 0.17 +/- 0.025 mmol/L, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Esmolol at millimolar concentrations causes diastolic ventricular arrest by two mechanisms: at 1 mmol/L (and below), the pronounced negative inotropic effect is due largely to inhibition of L-type Ca(2+) channels; additionally, higher concentrations prevent action potential conduction, probably due to the inhibition of fast Na(+) channels.