"Our complication rates are lower than theirs": statistical critique of heart valve comparisons

Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo-Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Aortic stenosis is a common and significant valve condition requiring bioprosthetic heart valves with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) being strongly recommended for high-risk patients or patients over 75 years. This meta-analysis aimed to pool existing data on postprocedural clinical as well as echocardiographic outcomes comparing valve-in-valve (ViV)-TAVR to redo-surgical aortic valve replacement to assess the short-term and medium-term outcomes for both treatment methods. A systematic literature search on Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Medline (PubMed interface) electronic databases from inception to August 2023. We used odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. Twenty-four studies (25,216 patients) were pooled with a mean follow-up of 16.4 months. The analysis revealed that ViV-TAVR group showed a significant reduction in 30-day mortality (OR 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43 to 0.58, p <0.00001), new-onset atrial fibrillation (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.67, p = 0.002), major bleeding event (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.45, p <0.00001) and lower rate of device success (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.53, p = 0.0003). There were no significant differences between either group when assessing 1-year mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, and effective orifice area. ViV-TAVR cohort showed a significantly increased incidence of paravalvular leaks, aortic regurgitation, and increased mean aortic valve gradient. ViV-TAVR is a viable short-term option for older patients with high co-morbidities and operative risks, reducing perioperative complications and improving 30-day mortality with no significant cardiovascular adverse events. However, both treatment methods present similar results on short-term to medium-term complications assessment.

Clinical Outcomes Using Freestyle Valve/Valsalva Graft Composite Conduit for Aortic Root Replacement

BACKGROUND

We review the clinical outcomes with a novel method of aortic root replacement using a self-constructed tissue valve-conduit comprised of a Freestyle subcoronary valve sewn into a Valsalva graft.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2020, 523 patients had aortic root replacement operations using a self-constructed Freestyle Subcoronary-Valsalva graft tissue valve-conduit. Median age was 62 years (IQR 54-70) and 430 (82%) were male patients. Primary outcomes were mortality and the need for reoperation. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for mortality and reoperation.

RESULTS

Urgent procedures comprised 48.37% of the cases and 29.26% were reoperative procedures. Concomitant ascending aorta replacement, hemi-arch replacement, and total arch replacement were required in 348 (67%), 227 (44%), and 40 (8%) patients, respectively. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 189 minutes (IQR 164-218) and 166 minutes (IQR 145-191). Early mortality was 7.7% (40), five and ten-year survival was 83% and 71% respectively. At last echo follow-up, LVEF, LV end diastolic diameter, degree of AI, and mean aortic valve gradient were significantly improved from baseline, p<0.001. Increasing age, peripheral artery disease, tobacco use, increased preoperative creatinine, and prior aortic valve surgery were risk factors for both mortality and the composite outcome (p<0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In a complex patient population, aortic root replacement using a self-constructed composite tissue valve-conduit comprised of a Freestyle Subcoronary Valve/Valsalva Graft can be performed with excellent operative and 10-year outcomes. Mid-term survival is acceptable and valve durability was outstanding with an exceedingly low incidence for valve reintervention.

Low-dose anticoagulation after isolated mechanical aortic valve replacement with Liva Nova Bicarbon prosthesis: A post hoc analysis of LOWERING-IT Trial

Thromboembolic complications after cardiac valve replacement are due to a complex interplay between patients' characteristics, device features and anticoagulation intensity. Subtle design and material differences in available prostheses may thrombosis. We conducted a post-hoc sub-analysis of the LOWERING-IT database to test the safety and feasibility of a low-level oral anticoagulant regime in low-risk patients with aortic LivaNova prosthetic valve replacement. The study population included 148 patients randomized to a low INR target (1.5-2.5; LOW-INR group), and 144 patients to the standard INR (2.0-3.0; CONVENTIONAL-INR group). The non-inferiority of thromboembolic events between LOW-INR and CONVENTIONAL-INR groups was tested. Cumulative follow-up reached 1,545 patient/years. The mean INR was 1.91 ± 0.23 in the LOW-INR group, and 2.59 ± 0.26 in the CONVENTIONAL-INR group (P < 0.001). There were 3 thromboembolic events, all in the CONVENTIONAL-INR group. Comparison of thromboembolic events was not significant. The 1-sided 97.5% exact CI for the difference in primary event proportion was 0.54%, satisfying criteria non-inferiority. Bleeding events were significantly different: 6.61 per 1,000 patient-year in LOW-INR group vs 18.65 per 1,000 patient-year in CONVENTIONAL-INR group (p < 0.045, RR 0.37). In conclusions these data suggest that low-dose anticoagulation is safe in selected patients after aortic LivaNova Bicarbon prosthesis implantation.

[Antiplatelet or anticoagulative strategies after surgical/interventional valve treatment]

At the end of August 2017 the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) published new joint guidelines for the treatment of valvular heart disease. These guidelines incorporate the scientific progress since the last version of the guidelines published in 2012. This article reviews current guideline recommendations for antiplatelet and anticoagulative therapy after surgical/interventional treatment of the aortic and mitral valves and discusses the underlying scientific evidence.

Implications of using different methods to characterise anticoagulant control in patients with second generation mechanical heart valve prostheses

OBJECTIVE

Characterisation of anticoagulant control is fundamental to investigations of its association with clinical outcome. Anticoagulant control depends on several factors. This paper aims to illustrate the implications of different methods for measuring and analysing anticoagulant control in patients with second generation mechanical heart valve prostheses.

METHODS

International normalised ratio (INR) data collected during the 10-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial were analysed. We considered the influence of: 3 different target INR ranges; anticoagulant control expressed as the proportion of INR readings (PoR) vs. anticoagulant control follow-up time (PoT); 3 ways of describing the profile of anticoagulant control over time.

RESULTS

Different target INR ranges dramatically influenced derived measures of anticoagulant control; the PoT within the target range varied from 88% for the widest to 28% for narrowest range. Overall distributions of PoR and PoT observations were similar but differed by up to ± 20% for individuals; PoT exceeded PoR when control was good but was less than PoR when control was poor. Classifying PoT outside the target range showed that widely varying combinations of PoT too high and too low are possible across individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Researchers' choices about methods for measuring and quantifying anticoagulant control markedly influence the values derived from INR readings. The use of different methods across studies makes it difficult or impossible to compare findings and to establish an evidence base for clinical practice. Methods for quantifying anticoagulant control should be standardised.

Association of gene polymorphisms with the risk of warfarin bleeding complications at therapeutic INR in patients with mechanical cardiac valves

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Pharmacogenetic studies of the genetic regulation of warfarin dose requirement have been reported, but few have been on the bleeding complications at therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of gene polymorphisms of CYP2C9, VKORC1, thrombomodulin (THBD) and C-reactive protein (CRP) on the risk of bleeding complications of warfarin at therapeutic INR in Korean patients with mechanical cardiac valves.

METHODS

A retrospective warfarin pharmacogenetic association study was performed. One hundred and forty-two patients with mechanical cardiac valves who were on warfarin anticoagulation therapy and maintained INR levels of 2·0-3·0 for 3 consecutive time intervals were followed up. CYP2C9 rs1057910, VKORC1 rs9934438, CRP rs1205, THBD rs1042580 and THBD rs3176123 were genotyped. The association between genotypes and warfarin bleeding complications was evaluated using logistic regression analysis, adjusted for demographic and clinical factors.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Of 142 eligible patients, 21 patients (14·8%) had bleeding complications at therapeutic INR. Patients with the G allele in THBD rs1042580 (AG or GG) had a lower risk of bleeding than patients with the AA genotype (adjusted OR: 0·210, 95% CI: 0·050-0·875, P = 0·032). The THBD rs3176123 polymorphism did not show any association with bleeding. For CRP rs1205, patients with the A allele (GA or AA genotype) had a higher risk of bleeding than patients with the GG genotype (adjusted OR: 5·575, 95% CI: 1·409-22·058, P = 0·014). Variant VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes did not confer a significant increase in the risk for bleeding complications.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

As expected, no association could be found between bleeding complications and two dose-related genes (CYP2C9*3 and VKORC1 rs9934438). In contrast, our results suggest that two genetic markers (THBD rs1042580 and CRP rs1205) could be predictors of bleeding complications of warfarin at normal INR. Given the retrospective study design and the relatively small sample size, our hypothesis requires further independent validation using more robust prospective designs. However, additional retrospective studies similar to ours but in populations with different genetic backgrounds should also be useful.

Statistical analysis of the results of heart valve replacement

A variety of statistical methods can be used to analyze the results of heart valve replacement. In this review, we illustrate the methodology and the application of the techniques that are most widely used. For early events, univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression are illustrated. For late (time-related) events, nonparametric methods (Kaplan-Meier and cumulative incidence or 'actual' analysis), parametric methods (based on the exponential, Gompertz and Weibull distributions) and semiparametric methods (Cox proportional hazards) are illustrated.

Management dilemmas in patients with mechanical heart valves and warfarin-induced major bleeding

Management of warfarin-induced major bleeding in patients with mechanical heart valves is challenging. There is vast controversy and confusion in the type of treatment required to reverse anticoagulation and stop bleeding as well as the ideal time to restart warfarin therapy safely without recurrence of bleeding and/or thromboembolism. Presently, the treatments available to reverse warfarin-induced bleeding are vitamin K, fresh frozen plasma, prothrombin complex concentrates and recombinant activated factor VIIa. Currently, vitamin K and fresh frozen plasma are the recommended treatments in patients with mechanical heart valves and warfarin-induced major bleeding. The safe use of prothrombin complex concentrates and recombinant activated factor VIIa in patients with mechanical heart valves is controversial and needs well-designed clinical studies. With regard to restarting anticoagulation in patients with warfarin-induced major bleeding and mechanical heart valves, the safe period varies from 7-14 d after the onset of bleeding for patients with intracranial bleed and 48-72 h for patients with extra-cranial bleed. In this review article, we present relevant literature about these controversies and suggest recommendations for management of patients with warfarin-induced bleeding and a mechanical heart valve. Furthermore, there is an urgent need for separate specific guidelines from major associations/ professional societies with regard to mechanical heart valves and warfarin-induced bleeding.

Achieved anticoagulation vs prosthesis selection for mitral mechanical valve replacement: a population-based outcome study

BACKGROUND

Thromboembolic events (TEs) are frequent after mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR), but their association to anticoagulation quality is unclear and has never been studied in a population-based setting with patients who have a complete anticoagulation record.

METHODS

We compiled a complete record of all residents of Olmsted County, MN, who underwent mechanical MVR between 1981 and 2004, for all TE, bleeding episodes, and international normalized ratios (INRs) measured from prosthesis implantation.

RESULTS

In the 112 residents (mean [+/- SD] age, 57 +/- 16 years; 60% female residents) who underwent mechanical MVR, 19,647 INR samples were obtained. While INR averaged 3.02 +/- 0.57, almost 40% of INRs were < 2 or > 4.5. Thirty-four TEs and 28 bleeding episodes occurred during a mean duration of 8.2 +/- 6.1 years of follow-up. There was no trend of association of INR (average, SD, growth variance rate, or intensity-specific incidence of events) with TE. Previous cardiac surgery (p = 0.014) and ball prosthesis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.92; 95% CI, 1.43 to 5.94; p = 0.003) independently determined TE. With MVR using a ball prosthesis, despite higher anticoagulation intensity (p = 0.002), the 8-year rate of freedom from TE was considerably lower (50 +/- 9% vs 81 +/- 5%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Compared with expected stroke rates in the population, stroke risk was elevated with non-ball prosthesis MVR (HR 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 5.2; p = 0.007) but was considerable with ball prosthesis MVR (HR 11.7; 95% CI, 7.5 to 18.4; p < 0.0001). INR variability (SD) was higher with a higher mean INR value (p < 0.0001). INR variability (HR 2.485; 95% CI, 1.11 to 5.55; p = 0.027) and cancer history (p < 0.0001) independently determined bleeding rates.

CONCLUSION

This population-based comprehensive study of anticoagulation and TE post-MVR shows that, in these closely anticoagulated patients, anticoagulation intensity was highly variable and not associated with TE incidence post-MVR. Higher anticoagulation intensity is linked to higher variability and, thus, to bleeding. The MVR-ball prosthesis design is associated with higher TE rates notwithstanding higher anticoagulation intensity, and its use should be retired worldwide.

Mitral valve-sparing procedures and prosthetic heart valve failure: a case report

Prosthetic heart valve dysfunction due to thrombus or pannus formation can be a life-threatening complication. The present report describes a 47-year-old woman who developed valvular cardiomyopathy after chorda-sparing mitral valve replacement, and subsequently underwent heart transplantation for progressive heart failure. The explanted mitral valve prosthesis showed significant thrombus and pannus leading to reduced leaflet mobility and valvular stenosis. The present report illustrates the role of the subvalvular apparatus and pannus in prosthesis dysfunction.

Anticoagulation intensity and outcomes among patients prescribed oral anticoagulant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy balance the risks of hemorrhage and thromboembolism. We sought to determine the association between anticoagulation intensity and the risk of hemorrhagic and thromboembolic events. We also sought to determine how under-or overanticoagulation would influence patient outcomes.

METHODS

We reviewed the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and CINAHL databases to identify studies involving patients taking anticoagulants that reported person-years of observation and the number of hemorrhages or thromboemboli in 3 or more discrete ranges of international normalized ratios. We estimated the overall relative and absolute risks of events specific to anticoagulation intensity.

RESULTS

We included 19 studies. The risk of hemorrhage increased significantly at high international normalized ratios. Compared with the therapeutic ratio of 2-3, the relative risk (RR) of hemorrhage (and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were 2.7 (1.8-3.9; p < 0.01) at a ratio of 3-5 and 21.8 (12.1-39.4; p < 0.01) at a ratio greater than 5. The risk of thromboemboli increased significantly at ratios less than 2, with a relative risk of 3.5 (95% CI 2.8-4.4; p < 0.01). The risk of hemorrhagic or thromboembolic events was lower at ratios of 3-5 (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.6) than at ratios of less than 2 (RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.9-3.1; p = 0.10). We found that a ratio of 2-3 had the lowest absolute risk (AR) of events (AR 4.3%/yr, 95% CI 3.0%-6.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The risks of hemorrhage and thromboemboli are minimized at international normalized ratios of 2-3. Ratios that are moderately higher than this therapeutic range appear safe and more effective than subtherapeutic ratios.

Choice of echocardiography method for postoperative evaluation of mitral valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis

OBJECT

The French Cardiology Society (SFC) systematically recommends (Class I) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after any mitral valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis (MMVR). Taking into account the increasing workload of echocardiography laboratories, our attitude was to propose that only post-operative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possible risks of this simplified procedure.

METHODS

We performed a precise analysis of one full year of practice of MMVR with exhaustive follow-up for the first 2 years concentrating on thromboembolic complications.

RESULTS

From January to December 2003, 84 MMVRs (46 after rheumatic fever, 22 degenerative disease, 11 infective endocarditis (IE) and 5 ischemia) were conducted in 45 women and 39 men of average age 61 years. Early mortality (<30 days) concerned 5 patients (5.9%). A control TTE to determine normal prosthetic function was performed 7+/-2 days after surgery and this revealed 2 cases of nonobstructive thrombosis which were treated medically, 3 cases of paraprosthetic regurgitation, and 1 vegetation due to underlying IE. Actuarial survival was 90.5% at 1 year and 83.3% at 2 years. After a mean follow-up of 179.3 patient-years, 5 patients were reoperated (5.9%): 1 for IE, 1 for paravalvular regurgitation, 1 for mitral valve insufficiency with haemolysis, and 2 for obstructive prosthetic valve thromboses. In addition there were 2 cases of prosthetic valve thrombosis, 8 ischemic strokes (2 ministrokes, 6 sequelar strokes), and 1 peripheral embolism. The global thromboembolic complication rate was therefore 6.1 per 100 patient-years (n=11). There were 4 hemorrhagic events, i.e. a rate of 2.2 events per 100 patient-years. 63% of the 1193 INR conducted were within the target range (3-4.5), 26% were below 3 and 11% were greater than 4.5. 35% of patients with thromboembolic complications had an INR<3.

CONCLUSION

Morbidity and mortality during the first 2 years after MMVR were relatively high but equivalent to the values of comparable series in the literature. These complications would not have been reduced by a more precise screening based on early TEE. Despite the increasingly litigious nature of the doctor-patient relationship, it would probably be excessive to oppose that this guideline was not followed in a dispute; in particular as it is difficult to apply this measure as echocardiography departments are overworked.

Prospective randomized comparison of CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical bileaflet mechanical heart valve prostheses: Ten-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

This is the final report of a randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of CarboMedics (CarboMedics Inc., Austin, Tex) and St. Jude Medical (St. Jude Medical Inc, St Paul, Minn) bileaflet mechanical heart valve prostheses 10 years after surgery.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 1996, 485 patients undergoing mechanical heart valve replacement were randomized to receive CarboMedics (n = 234) or St. Jude Medical (n = 251) prostheses for aortic (n = 288), mitral (n = 160), or double (n = 37) valve replacements. Patients were followed annually to the end of 2004.

RESULTS

Demographic, preoperative, and operative characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The median follow-up was 10 years in both groups (CarboMedics 99% complete, St. Jude Medical 98% complete; 3879 patient-years of follow-up). Overall, 165 patients died, 25 of valve-related causes. Ten-year survivals were 66.4% (95% confidence interval: 59.6%-72.3%) and 64.7% (95% confidence interval: 58.0%-70.6%) in the CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical groups, respectively (P = .94). Freedom at 10 years from valve-related mortality was 95.0% (95% confidence interval: 90.8%-97.3%) in the CarboMedics group and 93.0% (95% confidence interval: 88.3%-95.9%) in the St. Jude Medical group. During follow-up, 34 patients had a thromboembolic event, 79 patients had at least 1 bleeding event, and 14 patients required reoperation. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to freedom from complications (P > or = .12); freedom from thromboembolism at 10 years (CarboMedics: 91.5%, 95% confidence interval: 86.5%-94.7%; St. Jude Medical: 92.2%, 95% confidence interval: 87.5%-95.2%); freedom from bleeding events (CarboMedics: 83.0%, 95% confidence interval: 76.6%-87.8%; St. Jude Medical: 77.5%, 95% confidence interval: 71.1%-82.7%); and freedom from death or valve-related complication (CarboMedics: 51.6%, 95% confidence interval: 44.7%-58.0%; St. Jude Medical: 46.2%, 95% confidence interval: 39.7%-52.4%). Linearized rates per patient-year were 1.1% in the CarboMedics group and 0.8% in the St. Jude Medical group for thromboembolism; 2.3% in the CarboMedics group and 3.2% in the St. Jude Medical group for bleeding events; and 0.72% in the CarboMedics group and 0.47% in the St. Jude Medical group for nonstructural valve dysfunction. International normalized ratio values were similar between the 2 groups throughout the study period.

CONCLUSION

At 10 years, the clinical outcome was similar with respect to these 2 mechanical bileaflet prostheses.

Fifteen-year results with the Hancock II valve: A multicenter experience

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to review the 15-year outcome of patients who received isolated aortic or mitral valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis.

METHODS

From 1983 through 2002, 1274 patients underwent 1293 isolated valve replacements, 809 aortic valve replacements and 484 mitral valve replacements, at hospitals in the Venetian area (Padova, Treviso, and Venice). Mean age was 68 +/- 8 years in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement and 66 +/- 9 years in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement; 52% of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement and 63% of patients undergoing mitral valve replacement were in New York Heart Association class III or greater. Coronary artery disease was present in 32% of patients who had undergone aortic valve replacement and 18% of patients who had undergone mitral valve replacement. Follow-up included 8520 patient-years, with a median of 12 years, and was 97% complete.

RESULTS

Overall 15-year survival was 39.7% +/- 2.4%, similar in both the aortic and mitral positions. Multivariable analysis of late survival showed the incremental risk of male sex, higher New York Heart Association class, coronary artery disease, and mitral position. Freedom from embolism was higher in the aortic position (81% +/- 2.9% in aortic vs 72% +/- 4.7% in mitral valve replacements). Freedom from endocarditis was similar in the aortic and mitral position (95% +/- 1.2% vs 94% +/- 1.7%). Freedom from reoperation (82% +/- 3.7% vs 71% +/- 5.0%) and from valve-related morbidity-mortality (52% +/- 3.6% vs 36% +/- 4.4%) was higher in patients who had undergone AVR. Actual freedom from structural valve deterioration for patients 60 years and older who had undergone aortic valve replacement was 96.5% +/- 1.3% versus 88% +/- 3.2% for patients who had undergone mitral valve replacement and 70% +/- 7.5% versus 77.5% +/- 5.3%, respectively, in younger patients. Multivariable Weibull analysis showed structural valve deterioration related to younger age and preoperative valve incompetence and inversely related to coronary artery disease.

CONCLUSION

Optimal 15-year durability can be expected in male patients 60 years and older who have undergone aortic valve replacement and in male patients 65 years and older who have undergone mitral valve replacement, extending safely the age limits for the use of this valve.

Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement

OBJECTIVE

Choice of a mechanical or biologic valve in aortic valve replacement remains controversial and rotates around different complications with different time-related incidence rates. Because serious complications will always "spill over" into mortality, our aim was to perform a meta-analysis on overall mortality after aortic valve replacement from series with a maximum follow-up of at least 10 years to determine the age- and risk factor-corrected impact of currently available mechanical versus stented bioprosthetic valves.

METHODS

Following a formal study protocol, we performed a dedicated literature search of publications during 1989 to 2004 and included articles on adult aortic valve replacement with a mechanical or stented bioprosthetic valve if age, mortality statistics, and prevalences of well-known risk factors could be extracted. We used standard and robust regression analyses of the case series data with valve type as a fixed variable.

RESULTS

We could include 32 articles with 15 mechanical and 23 biologic valve series totaling 17,439 patients and 101,819 patient-years. The mechanical and biologic valve series differed in regard to mean age (58 vs 69 years), mean follow-up (6.4 vs 5.3 years), coronary artery bypass grafting (16% vs 34%), endocarditis (7% vs 2%), and overall death rate (3.99 vs 6.33 %/patient-year). Mean age of the valve series was directly related to death rate with no interaction with valve type. Death rate corrected for age, New York Heart Association classes III and IV, aortic regurgitation, and coronary artery bypass grafting left valve type with no effect. Included articles that abided by current guidelines and compared a mechanical and biologic valve found no differences in rates of thromboembolism.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in risk factor-corrected overall death rate between mechanical or bioprosthetic aortic valves irrespective of age. Choice of prosthetic valve should therefore not be rigorously based on age alone. Risk of bioprosthetic valve degeneration in young and middle-aged patients and in the elderly and old with a long life expectancy would be an important factor because risk of stroke may primarily be related to patient factors.

[Surgery for patients with mechanical heart valves--adjustment and tailoring of anticoagulant therapy]

Valvular surgery in patients (pts) with long history of cardiac valve disease is accomplishing improvement of symptoms, functional status and longevity. The numbers are very big also in our country. Our census numbers are not reliable, but estimation of above 15000 pts with prosthetic heart valve implants is close to correct. Since significant increase in survival and longevity of those pts, the possibility and necessity for non cardiac operative procedures are also increased. Because of specificity and complex constant regular anticoagulation therapy in order to prevent catastrophic prosthetic valve thrombosis and common thromboembolic complication good, but safe reduction of anticoagulation status to accomplish also safe haemostatic condition necessary for all surgical procedures. Individual adjustment and tailoring of anticoagulant and anti aggregation therapies according to accepted international protocols should be carefully done with necessery variation depending on the non cardiac organ and system involved: urgent either minor or major surgical interventions; bleeding peptic ulcer; elective surgery including ophtalmic and common dental procedures with risk of bleeding.

Recommendations for the management of patients after heart valve surgery

Approximately 50,000 valve replacement operations take place in Europe annually and almost as many valve repair procedures. Previous European guidelines on management of patients after valve surgery were last published in 1995 and were limited to recommendations about antithrombotic prophylaxis. American guidelines covering the broader topic of the investigation and treatment of patients with valve disease were published in 1998 but devoted relatively little space to post-surgical management. This document represents the consensus view of a committee drawn from three European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Groups (WG): the WG on Valvular Heart Disease, the WG on Thrombosis, and the WG on Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology. In almost all areas of patient management after valve surgery, randomized trials and meta-analyses do not exist. Such randomized trials as do exist are very few in number, are narrowly focused with small numbers, have limited general applicability, and do not lend themselves to meta-analysis because of widely divergent methodologies and different patient characteristics. Recommendations are therefore almost entirely based on non-randomized studies and relevant basic science.

Drug Insight: an overview of current anticoagulation therapy after heart valve replacement

Vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, are the gold standard approach for the long-term anticoagulant therapy of patients with mechanical heart valves. Management decisions are, however, based predominantly on expert consensus and on data from nonrandomized, follow-up studies, which have inherent limitations in their methods. Low-intensity anticoagulation therapy provides protection against thromboembolic complications in patients with most types of modern prosthetic heart valve. The addition of low-dose aspirin is safe if international normalized ratio values below 3.5 are maintained. A combined regimen should be considered in high-risk patients and those with coexistent coronary artery or cerebrovascular disease, and in patients who have suffered a thromboembolic event despite a therapeutic international normalized ratio. Thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparins is restricted to specific situations, such as when a patient is intolerant to vitamin K antagonists, when surgical procedures require discontinuation of oral anticoagulation, or when the patient is pregnant. A lack of uniformity across practice guidelines make it difficult to reach treatment decisions. Each patient's preference, expressed after counseling about the risks and benefits of each treatment strategy, and an individual assessment of the patient's risk factors, should guide treatment decisions. At present, new anticoagulant agents such as factor Xa inhibitors do not represent a treatment option for heart valve recipients.

Mitral mechanical replacement in young rheumatic women: Analysis of long-term survival, valve-related complications, and pregnancy outcomes over a 3707-patient-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

A follow-up study was performed to assess long-term survival, valve-related complications, and pregnancy outcomes in young rheumatic women undergoing isolated mitral mechanical replacement. The influence of prosthetic type on outcomes was also investigated.

METHODS

Between 1975 and 2003, 267 isolated mitral mechanical prostheses were implanted. Follow-up reached 3707.8 patient-years.

RESULTS

Actuarial survival at 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years was 97% +/- 0.01%, 90.4% +/- 0.017%, 85.3% +/- 0.023%, 82.3% +/- 0.025%, 71.7% +/- 0.036%, and 70.2% +/- 0.038%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, atrial fibrillation at follow-up was identified as an independent risk factor for late mortality, whereas left ventricular ejection fraction at 12 postoperative months proved to be a protective factor. Freedom from thromboembolism at 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years was 98.1% +/- 0.01%, 94.1% +/- 0.015%, 89.1% +/- 0.021%, 85.9% +/- 0.025%, 81.1% +/- 0.031%, and 75.3% +/- 0.063%, respectively. Atrial fibrillation and Carbomedics device were significantly associated with an increase in thromboembolic events. Freedom from reoperation at 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years was 99.2% +/- 0.005%, 95% +/- 0.014%, 91.6% +/- 0.018%, 88.6% +/- 0.022%, and 85.7% +/- 0.041%. Type of prosthesis (tilting disc) was identified as a predictor of reoperation. At the end of the study, 208 patients were still alive: 94.7% were in New York Heart Association class I or II. When receiving warfarin therapy, no patient undertaking pregnancy (n = 35) experienced adverse cardiac or valve-related events. Fetal events were significantly less frequent with a daily warfarin dose less than 5 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical devices provided excellent performance, safety, and durability. The prognostic role of left ventricular function and atrial fibrillation overwhelmed any differences that might exist between different prosthetic designs. Pregnancies entail virtually no maternal risk and predictable fetal complications.

Mitral valve repair: We must do a better job

Mitral valve repair is the only heart valve operation with the potential to restore a patient to expected survival. A mandate currently exists for early surgical repair of mitral regurgitation before the onset of symptoms and significant left ventricular dysfunction. It is based upon a better understanding of the natural history of mitral regurgitation, the poor results with medical therapy, and the negative impact of abnormal left ventricular size and function, and symptoms of long-term survival. It is also based on better operative mortality, quality of life, and longevity with repair compared with replacement. Despite the existence of this mandate, overall mitral valve repair rates remain generally low in the United States. The biggest impact on mitral repair rates is likely to come from cardiologists, who would embrace the mandate and insist on mitral valve repair and refer their patients to surgeons who consistently and successfully repair mitral valves.

Thromboembolic and Bleeding Complications Following St. Jude Medical Valve Replacement

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Due to their inherent thrombogenicity, mechanical cardiac valves necessitate lifelong oral anticoagulation. Less intensive oral anticoagulation than recommended earlier might result in a lower incidence of bleeding complications without increasing the embolic hazard significantly.

DESIGN

Comparison of three different intensities of oral anticoagulation in a prospective, randomized multicenter design. Three months after valve replacement, patients were randomly assigned to stratum A, international normalized ratio (INR) 3.0 to 4.5; stratum B, INR 2.5 to 4.0; or stratum C, INR 2.0 to 3.5.

PATIENTS

Data from 2,735 patients following aortic valve replacement (AVR; n = 2,024), mitral valve replacement (MVR; n = 553), and combined AVR and MVR (n = 158) with the St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve (St. Jude Medical; St. Paul, MN) between July 1993 and May 1999 were analyzed, covering a total follow-up period of 6,801 patient-years. All complications were registered prospectively.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Fifty-one thromboembolic events (TEs) were documented, resulting in a linearized incidence of 0.75 TEs per 100 patient-years, 22 of which were minor (0.32% per patient-year), 10 were moderate (0.15% per patient-year), and 19 were severe (0.28% per patient-year). Thromboembolism following AVR was significantly lower than after MVR (0.53% per patient-year vs 1.64% per patient-year). Patients reported 1,687 bleeding complications (24.8% per patient-year). The vast majority of bleeding complications (n = 1,509; 22.2% per patient-year) were classified as minor, 140 were classified as moderate (2.06% per patient-year), and 38 were classified as severe (0.56% per patient-year). The clinically relevant incidences of moderate and severe TEs and bleeding complications were not significantly different between the three prespecified INR strata.

CONCLUSIONS

The intention-to-treat analysis of the results of the German Experience With Low Intensity Anticoagulation study leads to the unexpected result that despite a sophisticated reporting system, the incidence of moderate and severe TE and bleeding complications was comparably low in all INR strata and more or less within the so-called background incidence reported for an age-related "normal" population. This study supports reexamination of the intensity of anticoagulation in patients with the SJM valve.

Biological or mechanical prostheses in tricuspid position? a meta-analysis of intra-institutional results

BACKGROUND

Tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) is an uncommon procedure. The use of biological vs mechanical prostheses in TVR has pros and cons. Therefore, we debate the choice between the different types of valves by means of a meta-analysis of studies of the last decade.

METHODS

The heading "tricuspid valve replacement and (bio* or mec*)" was used to retrieve studies from Medline, Current Contents, and Embase. Eight out of 11 studies met the preset strict criteria: intra-institutional comparison of results of biological or mechanical TVR. Survival of hospital-discharged patients was recalculated to reduce the effect of unbalanced perioperative risk factors on overall survival. Hazard ratio was obtained from actuarial survival graphics comparison and at-risk groups, according to the method described by Parmar. If missing, the number of patients at risk was approximated assuming constant and noninformative censoring. Hazard pooling was done according to study heterogeneity. Bioprostheses were assumed as the gold standard and mechanical prostheses assumed as the challenging device. Therefore, a hazard more than 1 pointed to a higher risk of mechanical prostheses. Our 1998 study was updated for this analysis.

RESULTS

In this study, 1,160 prostheses and 6,046 follow-up years were analyzed. The pooled survival hazard ratio of mechanical prostheses versus bioprostheses was 1.07 (0.84 to 1.35, p = 0.60). The pooled freedom from reoperation hazard ratio was 1.24 (0.67 to 2.31, p = 0.67). Pooled survival differences were trivial, favoring mechanical prostheses at 1 (-0.04%) and 15 years (-1.1%) and favoring bioprostheses (+1.8%) at 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

There is not a gold standard in tricuspid prostheses replacement. Prosthetic choice is left to the surgeon's clinical judgment, taking into consideration each patient's characteristics and needs.

Mechanical heart valves: are two leaflets better than one?

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement with single-disc and bileaflet mechanical heart valves.

METHODS

From May 1975 through October 2001, 590 single-disc valves (7 models) were used for isolated valve replacement, and from November 1980 through July 2002, 1283 bileaflet valves (10 models) were used for isolated valve replacement. Detailed follow-up was performed to a maximum of 27.4 and 21.9 years with a total of 6872 and 5811 patient-years for single-disc valves and bileaflet valves, respectively. Survival and valve-related events were analyzed.

RESULTS

Single-disc valves were mainly implanted from 1975 through 1995, whereas bileaflet valves were mainly implanted from 1987 through 2002; thus the years of concurrent use were 1987 through 1995. The bileaflet valve had a significantly lower explantation rate, whereas the single-disc valve had a significantly lower thromboembolism rate. No significant differences were detected in early mortality, long-term survival, and other valve-related complications. When limiting the comparison to the concurrent period of 1987 through 1995, no significant difference was detected in survival or in any valve-related complication.

CONCLUSION

Single-disc and bileaflet valves provide similar clinical performance. The predominant use of bileaflet valves is not based on clinical outcomes.

Newer concepts in the surgical treatment of valvular heart disease

The search for the ideal therapy for valve replacement continues. The major options include mechanical or tissue valves, with an increasing variety of tissue valves becoming available. The key factor continues to be thrombogenicity versus durability. Aortic valve surgery primarily consists of replacement. This is aided by the increased variety of options allowing tailoring of the procedure to the patient's native valve disease. Mitral valve surgery has greater potential for repair, which affords preservation of the native valve, optimizing function and reducing long-term complications. An increasingly popular concept is treatment of secondary or functional mitral valve regurgitation in the setting of depressed left ventricular function. The routine use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography and a trend toward the use of minimally invasive procedures are altering the conduct of valve operations.