Variation in the direction of selection applied by pentenol to the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster

Tolerance to 1-pentene-3-ol and to 1-pentene-3-one in relation to alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldo keto reductase (AKR) activities in Drosophila melanogaster

The detoxification of 1-pentene-3-ol (pentenol) and 1-pentene-3-one (pentenone) by Drosophila melanogaster adult flies has been studied in two homozygous lines for the AdhF and AdhS alleles (LRC lines), in their respective lines selected for tolerance to ethanol (LRSe lines) and in a homozygous strain for the Adhn4 null allele. For each line, the genotype and sex LDs50 of both compounds were estimated. Then, in order to explain the differences in LD50, both alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldo keto reductase (AKR) activities were assayed. In addition, the effects of pentenone on AKR activity were also studied. Our results show that ADH-positive flies exhibit a much higher sensitivity to pentenol than ADH-null flies. However, both ADH-positive and ADH-null flies show a similar tolerance to pentenone. Our results show that flies selected for improving tolerance to ethanol also have increased tolerance to pentenol (FF and SS flies) and pentenone (SS flies). However, this improved ability to tolerate pentenol and/or pentenone cannot be explained by changes in ADH or AKR activities. On the other hand, we have observed a beneficial effect of pentenol, but not of pentenone, in n4 flies. We also show that AKR activity is not modified by the administration of pentenone. These results suggest that, in the absence of ADH activity, pentenol may be transformed into a compound that is less toxic than pentenone and that pentenone itself might also be transformed into a less toxic compound.

Participation of Drosophila melanogaster alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) in the detoxification of 1-pentene-3-ol and 1-pentene-3-one

The participation of the ADH enzymes in the detoxification by D. melanogaster of 1-pentene-3-ol (also called pentenol) and its oxidized product, 1-pentene-3-one (usually known as ethyl-vinyl-ketone or pentenone) have been studied using the LR lines. For this purpose flies of AdhS AdhS (SS) and AdhF AdhF (FF) genotypes were independently pretreated with a 2 per cent isopropanol (2-propanol) solution and the survivors exposed to water, to a 0.0075 per cent pentenol solution or to a 0.00375 per cent pentenone solution. After one day in these solutions, the ability to tolerate both compounds was checked and the ADH activity of the surviving flies was measured and compared with those of control flies not pretreated with isopropanol. Additionally, the effects of pentenone on ADH enzymes have been studied by comparing them with those of acetone. Our results show that, in contrast to acetone, pentenone neither reduced significantly the ADH activity in vivo nor altered the normal proportion of ADH isozymes of either SS or FF flies. Our findings also demonstrate that the isopropanol pretreatment implied a considerable decrease in sensitivity not only to pentenol (60 and 91 per cent for SS and FF flies, respectively) but also to pentenone (72 and 80 per cent for SS and FF flies, respectively). After isopropanol pretreatment, FF flies continued exhibiting higher ADH activities than SS ones. However, FF pretreated flies displayed higher tolerance to pentenol and a similar tolerance to pentenone than SS animals. Our results suggest that pentenol (unsaturated secondary alcohol) and isopropanol (saturated secondary alcohol) may be detoxified by slightly different processes (both ADH-activity-dependent), and that pentenone could not be accumulated in the fly but transformed into another compound(s) by means of some ADH-independent mechanism(s).

Differences in life history traits between alcohol dehydrogenase genotypes of Drosophila mercatorum: background and maternal genotype effects

The effects of genotype at the alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) locus on developmental time and fecundity were studied using three strains of Drosophila mercatorum. All three strains had similar genetic backgrounds and two were homozygous for the same electrophoretic allele (F for fast). The third strain was homozygous for the slow allele (S). The life history traits of all possible progeny of these strains were studied. The results showed that for both mean developmental time and pattern of eclosion, strong maternal genotype and background effects were present. Fecundity among genotypes was not different, although there was an effect on the total number of offspring suggesting differences in egg-to-adult survivorship.

The alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 3. Differences in developmental times

From the F2ratios of crosses betweenDrosophila melanogasterstrains homozygous for theAdhF(F) and theAdhs(S) allele it has been concluded that the developmental time ofFFhomozygotes is shorter than that ofSShomozygotes. This difference is found to be reinforced by increasing levels of crowding. A further analysis of developmental times has been performed by the transfer of larvae to agar medium after they have stayed for periods of variable length on regular food. From the percentage of emerging adults it can be concluded thatFFlarvae and, to a lesser extentFSlarvae, either reach their critical weights for pupation earlier thanSSlarvae or possess a lower critical weight. These differences in developmental time influence the course of allele frequencies. Between populations kept on a 2-week transfer schedule and on a 3-week schedule a divergence of allele frequencies is observed, in the former a decrease inSfrequency occurs. The relevance of the observed differences in developmental time for the maintenance of theAdhpolymorphism is discussed for laboratory populations kept on regular food and at varying densities.