1
|
McDonald S, Wallis K, Horowitz M, Mann E, Le V, Donald M. Acceptability and optimisation of resources to support antidepressant cessation: a qualitative think-aloud study with patients in Australian primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2024; 74:e113-e119. [PMID: 38272680 PMCID: PMC10714746 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2023.0269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stopping long-term (>12 months) antidepressant use can be difficult due to unpleasant withdrawal symptoms. Many people do not recognise withdrawal symptoms or understand how to minimise them while safely discontinuing antidepressants. To address the gaps, the authors developed the 'Redressing long-term antidepressant use' (RELEASE) resources, comprising a medicines information brochure, a decision aid, and drug- specific hyperbolic tapering protocols. AIM To explore patients' acceptability of the RELEASE resources to optimise their use and impact. DESIGN AND SETTING A think-aloud interview study among adults with lived experience of long-term antidepressant use conducted in south-east Queensland, Australia, between November 2021 and June 2022. METHOD Participants were purposively sampled from general practices and interviewed face-to-face or via videoconferencing. Participants verbalised their thoughts, impressions, and feelings while engaging with each resource. Interviews were analysed using a deductive coding framework, including codes related to acceptability and optimisation. Interviews were analysed in a series of four tranches, with iterative modifications made to resources after each tranche. RESULTS Participants (n = 14) reported the resources to be relevant, informative, motivational, and usable. Participants' comments informed modifications, including changes to wording, content order, and layout. Several participants expressed frustration that they had not had these resources earlier, with one reporting the information could have been 'life changing'. Many commented on the need for these resources to be widely available to both patients and doctors. CONCLUSION The RELEASE resources were found to be acceptable, useful, and potentially life changing. The effectiveness of these consumer-informed resources in supporting safe cessation of long-term antidepressants is currently being tested in general practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne McDonald
- General Practice Clinical Unit, Medical School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Katharine Wallis
- General Practice Clinical Unit, Medical School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Mark Horowitz
- Research and Development Department, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Esther Mann
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Vilany Le
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Maria Donald
- General Practice Clinical Unit, Medical School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carter M, Abutheraa N, Ivers N, Grimshaw J, Chapman S, Rogers P, Simeoni M, Antony J, Watson MC. Audit and feedback interventions involving pharmacists to influence prescribing behaviour in general practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fam Pract 2023; 40:615-628. [PMID: 36633309 PMCID: PMC10745261 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmac150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pharmacists, as experts in medicines, are increasingly employed in general practices and undertake a range of responsibilities. Audit and feedback (A&F) interventions are effective in achieving behaviour change, including prescribing. The extent of pharmacist involvement in A&F interventions to influence prescribing is unknown. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of A&F interventions involving pharmacists on prescribing in general practice compared with no A&F/usual care and to describe features of A&F interventions and pharmacist characteristics. METHODS Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, (Social) Science Citation Indexes, ISI Web of Science) were searched (2012, 2019, 2020). Cochrane systematic review methods were applied to trial identification, selection, and risk of bias. Results were summarized descriptively and heterogeneity was assessed. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted where studies were sufficiently homogenous in design and outcome. RESULTS Eleven cluster-randomized studies from 9 countries were included. Risk of bias across most domains was low. Interventions focussed on older patients, specific clinical area(s), or specific medications. Meta-analysis of 6 studies showed improved prescribing outcomes (pooled risk ratio: 0.78, 95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.94). Interventions including both verbal and written feedback or computerized decision support for prescribers were more effective. Pharmacists who received study-specific training, provided ongoing support to prescribers or reviewed prescribing for individual patients, contributed to more effective interventions. CONCLUSIONS A&F interventions involving pharmacists can lead to small improvements in evidence-based prescribing in general practice settings. Future implementation of A&F within general practice should compare different ways of involving pharmacists to determine how to optimize effectiveness.PRISMA-compliant abstract included in Supplementary Material 1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Carter
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Nouf Abutheraa
- School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Noah Ivers
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeremy Grimshaw
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Chapman
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Philip Rogers
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jesmin Antony
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Margaret C Watson
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wallis KA, Donald M, Horowitz M, Moncrieff J, Ware RS, Byrnes J, Thrift K, Cleetus M, Panahi I, Zwar N, Morgan M, Freeman C, Scott I. RELEASE (REdressing Long-tErm Antidepressant uSE): protocol for a 3-arm pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial effectiveness-implementation hybrid type-1 in general practice. Trials 2023; 24:615. [PMID: 37770893 PMCID: PMC10537226 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07646-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many people experience withdrawal symptoms when they attempt to stop antidepressants. Withdrawal symptoms are readily misconstrued for relapse or ongoing need for medication, contributing to long-term use (> 12 months). Long-term antidepressant use is increasing internationally yet is not recommended for most people. Long-term use is associated with adverse effects including weight gain, sexual dysfunction, lethargy, emotional numbing and increased risk of falls and fractures. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of two multi-strategy interventions (RELEASE and RELEASE+) in supporting the safe cessation of long-term antidepressants, estimate cost-effectiveness, and evaluate implementation strategies. METHODS DESIGN: 3-arm pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial effectiveness-implementation hybrid type-1. SETTING primary care general practices in southeast Queensland, Australia. POPULATION adults 18 years or older taking antidepressants for longer than 1 year. Practices will be randomised on a 1.5:1:1 ratio of Usual care:RELEASE:RELEASE+. INTERVENTION RELEASE for patients includes evidence-based information and resources and an invitation to medication review; RELEASE for GPs includes education, training and printable resources via practice management software. RELEASE+ includes additional internet support for patients and prescribing support including audit and feedback for GPs. OUTCOME MEASURES the primary outcome is antidepressant use at 12 months self-reported by patients. Cessation is defined as 0 mg antidepressant maintained for at least 2 weeks. SECONDARY OUTCOMES at 6 and 12 months are health-related quality of life, antidepressant side effects, well-being, withdrawal symptoms, emotional numbing, beliefs about antidepressants, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms; and at 12 months 75% reduction in antidepressant dose; aggregated practice level antidepressant prescribing, and health service utilisation for costs. SAMPLE SIZE 653 patients from 28 practices. A concurrent evaluation of implementation will be through mixed methods including interviews with up to 40 patients and primary care general practitioners, brief e-surveys, and study administrative data to assess implementation outcomes (adoption and fidelity). DISCUSSION The RELEASE study will develop new knowledge applicable internationally on the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and implementation of two multi-strategy interventions in supporting the safe cessation of long-term antidepressants to improve primary health care and outcomes for patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ANZCTR, ACTRN12622001379707p. Registered on 27 October 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine A Wallis
- General Practice Clinical Unit, Medical School, The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
| | - Maria Donald
- General Practice Clinical Unit, Medical School, The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - Mark Horowitz
- NHS Foundation Trust, Research and Development Department, London, Northeast London, UK
| | | | - Robert S Ware
- Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Joshua Byrnes
- Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Karen Thrift
- General Practice Clinical Unit, Medical School, The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - MaryAnne Cleetus
- General Practice Clinical Unit, Medical School, The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - Idin Panahi
- General Practice Clinical Unit, Medical School, The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - Nicholas Zwar
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Mark Morgan
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Chris Freeman
- The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - Ian Scott
- The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kurlander JE, Helminski D, Lanham M, Henstock JL, Kidwell KM, Krein SL, Saini SD, Richardson CR, De Vries R, Resnicow K, Ruff AL, Wallace DM, Jones EK, Perry LK, Parsons J, Ha N, Alexandris-Souphis T, Dedrick D, Aldridge E, Barnes GD. Development of a multicomponent implementation strategy to reduce upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk in patients using warfarin and antiplatelet therapy, and protocol for a pragmatic multilevel randomized factorial pilot implementation trial. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:8. [PMID: 35090577 PMCID: PMC8796614 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00256-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The concomitant use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications increases the risk of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Two underused evidence-based practices (EBPs) can reduce the risk: de-prescribe unnecessary antiplatelet therapy or initiate a proton pump inhibitor. We describe the development of a multicomponent intervention to increase use of these EBPs in patients treated with warfarin and followed by an anticoagulation monitoring service (AMS), and the design of a pilot pragmatic implementation trial. METHODS A participatory planning group iteratively used Implementation Mapping and the Multiphase Optimization Strategy to develop implementation strategies and plan the trial. Informed by qualitative interviews with patients and clinicians, we drew on several implementation science theories, as well as self-determination theory, to design interventions. For patients, we developed an activation guide to help patients discuss the EBPs with their clinicians. For clinicians, we developed two electronic health record (EHR)-based interventions: (1) clinician notification (CN) consists of a templated message that identifies a patient as high risk, summarizes the EBPs, and links to a guidance statement on appropriate use of antiplatelet therapy. (2) Clinician notification with nurse facilitation (CN+NF) consists of a similar notification message but includes additional measures by nursing staff to support appropriate and timely decision-making: the nurse performs a chart review to identify any history of vascular disease, embeds indication-specific guidance on antiplatelet therapy in the message, and offers to assist with medication order entry and patient education. We will conduct a pilot factorial cluster- and individual-level randomized controlled trial with a primary objective of evaluating feasibility. Twelve clinicians will be randomized to receive either CN or CN+NF for all their patients managed by the AMS while 50 patients will be individually randomized to receive either the activation guide or usual care. We will explore implementation outcomes using patient and clinician interviews along with EHR review. DISCUSSION This pilot study will prepare us to conduct a larger optimization study to identify the most potent and resource conscious multicomponent implementation strategy to help AMSs increase the use of best practices for upper GI bleeding risk reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05085405 . Registered on October 19, 2021-retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob E Kurlander
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Veterans Affairs (VA) Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Danielle Helminski
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michael Lanham
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan Office of Clinical Informatics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jennifer L Henstock
- Health Information Technology and Services, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kelley M Kidwell
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sarah L Krein
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Veterans Affairs (VA) Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sameer D Saini
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Veterans Affairs (VA) Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Caroline R Richardson
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Raymond De Vries
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kenneth Resnicow
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - David M Wallace
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Elizabeth K Jones
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Linda K Perry
- Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jacqueline Parsons
- Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nghi Ha
- Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tina Alexandris-Souphis
- Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Dale Dedrick
- Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Elizabeth Aldridge
- Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Geoffrey D Barnes
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wallis KA, Elley CR, Hikaka JF, Moyes SA. Process evaluation of the Safer Prescribing and Care for the Elderly (SPACE) cluster randomised controlled trial in New Zealand general practice. J Prim Health Care 2022; 14:244-253. [DOI: 10.1071/hc22052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
6
|
Safer prescribing and care for the elderly (SPACE): cluster randomised controlled trial in general practice. BJGP Open 2021; 6:BJGPO.2021.0129. [PMID: 34645654 PMCID: PMC8958757 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Safer prescribing in general practice may help to decrease preventable adverse drug events (ADE) and related hospitalisations. Aim To test the effect of the Safer Prescribing and Care for the Elderly (SPACE) intervention on high-risk prescribing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or antiplatelet medicines and related hospitalisations. Design & setting A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial in general practice. Participants were patients at increased risk of ADEs from NSAIDs and/or antiplatelet medicines at baseline. SPACE comprises automated search to generate for each GP a list of patients with high-risk prescribing; pharmacist outreach to provide education and one-on-one review of list with GP; and automated letter inviting patients to seek medication review with their GP. Method The primary outcome was the difference in high-risk prescribing of NSAIDs and/or antiplatelet medicines at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were high-risk prescribing for gastrointestinal, renal, or cardiac ADEs separately, 12-month outcomes, and related ADE hospitalisations. Results Thirty-nine practices were recruited with 205 GPs and 191 593 patients, of which 21 877 (11.4%) were participants. Of the participants, 1479 (6.8%) had high-risk prescribing. High-risk prescribing improved in both groups at 6 and 12 months compared with baseline. At 6 months, there was no significant difference between groups (odds ratio [OR] 0.99; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.87 to 1.13) although SPACE improved more for gastrointestinal ADEs (OR 0.81; 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.96). At 12 months, the control group improved more (OR 1.29; 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.49). There was no significant difference for related hospitalisations. Conclusion Further work is needed to identify scalable interventions that support safer prescribing in general practice. The use of automated search and feedback plus letter to patient warrants further exploration.
Collapse
|
7
|
Safer Prescribing and Care for the Elderly (SPACE): a pilot study in general practice. BJGP Open 2018; 2:bjgpopen18X101594. [PMID: 30564727 PMCID: PMC6189787 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen18x101594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background High-risk prescribing places patients at increased risk of adverse drug events (ADEs). High-risk prescribing and ADE hospitalisations are increasingly common as people are living longer and taking more medicines for multiple chronic conditions. The Safer Prescribing and Care for the Elderly (SPACE) intervention is designed to foster patient engagement in medicines management and prompt medicines review. Aim To pilot the SPACE intervention in preparation for a larger cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT). Design & setting A pilot study in two general practices. Study participants were all patients at increased risk of an adverse drug reaction (ADE) from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or antiplatelet medicines. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants receiving high-risk prescribing at 6 months and 12 months compared with baseline. Method The SPACE intervention comprised automated practice audit to identify and generate for each GP a list of patients with high-risk prescribing for these medicines; an outreach visit by clinical advisory pharmacist to deliver education and to go through with each GP their list of at-risk patients and indicate in a tick-box the intended action for each patient; and a mail-out from GPs to selected patients containing a medicines information brochure and a letter encouraging patients to discuss their medicines when they next see their GP. Results SPACE can be delivered within existing primary care infrastructure. The rate of high-risk prescribing was reduced at 6 months following the delivery of the intervention, but these improvements were not evident at 12 months. Conclusion SPACE prompts medicines review and shows promising signs of supporting safer prescribing in general practice in the short term. A randomised trial of SPACE started in 2018.
Collapse
|
8
|
Wallis KA, Elley CR, Lee A, Moyes S, Kerse N. Safer Prescribing and Care for the Elderly (SPACE): Protocol of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care. JMIR Res Protoc 2018; 7:e109. [PMID: 29699966 PMCID: PMC5945992 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.9839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2018] [Revised: 03/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-risk prescribing, adverse drug events, and avoidable adverse drug event hospitalizations are common. The single greatest risk factor for high-risk prescribing and adverse drug events is the number of medications a person is taking. More people are living longer and taking more medications for multiple long-term conditions. Most on-going prescribing occurs in primary care. The most effective, cost-effective, and practical approach to safer prescribing in primary care is not yet known. OBJECTIVE To test the effect of the Safer Prescribing And Care for the Elderly (SPACE) intervention on high-risk prescribing of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and antiplatelet medicines, and related adverse drug event hospitalizations. METHODS This is a protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial. The clusters will be primary care practices. Data collection and analysis will be at the level of patient. RESULTS Recruitment started in 2018. Six-month data collection will be in 2018. CONCLUSIONS This study addresses an important translational gap, testing an intervention designed to prompt medicines review and support safer prescribing in routine primary care practice. TRIAL REGISTRATIONgeneral practice Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12618000034235 http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12618000034235.aspx (Archived with Webcite at http://www.webcitation.org/6yj9RImDf)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine Ann Wallis
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Carolyn Raina Elley
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Arier Lee
- School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Simon Moyes
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ngaire Kerse
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dovey S. From the Editor: Kindness and positive deviance. J Prim Health Care 2017. [DOI: 10.1071/hcv9n2_ed1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|