1
|
Stone N, Graham C, Bremner S, McGrath N, Bedford R, Brown KE, Newby K, Clarke A, Jackson L, Morrison L, Nadarzynski T, To Y. Evaluating the home-based intervention strategy (HIS-UK) to reduce new chlamydia infection among young men aged 16-25 years by promoting correct and consistent condom use: findings from a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:1607. [PMID: 39696349 PMCID: PMC11654348 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11911-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 11/11/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Correct and consistent condom use is the most effective method to reduce transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). OBJECTIVE To compare the HIS-UK intervention to usual condom information and distribution care for effect on chlamydia test positivity. METHODS Trial design A 3-parallel arm randomised controlled trial (1:1:1 allocation, two intervention arms vs. control). Randomisation using permuted blocks of varying lengths, with stratification by site, ethnicity and sexual-partnering risk. Repeated measures design with monthly follow-up to six months post-randomisation. Setting Sexual health services in seven NHS Trusts and one university medical centre. Telephone and video consultations, online and in participants' homes in England, UK. Participants Target sample of 2231 men and people with penises, aged 16-25, at risk of STIs. Intervention HIS-UK delivered (1) face-to-face by health professionals (proHIS) or (2) digitally (eHIS). Two-weeks self-practice and experimentation using the HIS-UK condom kit. Primary health outcome Chlamydia test positivity by six-months. Secondary outcomes Frequency of unprotected sexual intercourse, reported condom use errors and problems, attitudes and use experience. Analyses Chlamydia test positivity by six months analysed by logistic regression. Secondary outcomes analysed using linear mixed effects models with fixed effects and a random effect for the repeated measures, and generalised estimating equations with a logit link, adjusting for fixed effects and specifying an autoregressive-1 correlation structure. RESULTS Seven hundred twenty-five participants (proHIS:241, eHIS:243, control:241) randomised. 575 participants completed all baseline activities, 189 (32.9%) reached six-months post-randomisation. The absolute difference in chlamydia test positivity between arms was -4.9 percentage points at six months (7.9% HIS-UK, 12.8% control). The odds of chlamydia test positivity during follow-up were 55% lower for HIS-UK participants (p=.261). HIS-UK showed a positive impact on recent condom use over time (p<.001). Significant reductions in condom errors and problems among HIS-UK participants were observed (p=.035). Lubricant use increased among HIS-UK participants, with evidence of an intervention-by-time interaction (p=.051), and a decline in poor condom fit and feel reports, but without intervention effect. CONCLUSIONS This study provides valuable insights into the potential of HIS-UK to enhance sexual health practices among at-risk populations at-risk of STI transmission. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN registration: 11400820 (23/10/2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Stone
- Centre for Sexual Health Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Cynthia Graham
- Centre for Sexual Health Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
- Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.
| | - Stephen Bremner
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
- Brighton and Sussex Clinical Trials Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Nuala McGrath
- CHERISH programme, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Department of Social Statistics & Demography, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Rowena Bedford
- NDORMS, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Katherine E Brown
- Public Health and Applied Behaviour Change Laboratory, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Katie Newby
- Public Health and Applied Behaviour Change Laboratory, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Amanda Clarke
- University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Louise Jackson
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Leanne Morrison
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Tom Nadarzynski
- School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK
| | - Ye To
- Brighton and Sussex Clinical Trials Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Silva RDS, Bossonario PA, Ferreira MRL, Andrade RLDP, Bonfim RO, Alencar V, Monroe AA. Factors associated with inconsistent condom use among young people: systematic review. Rev Gaucha Enferm 2024; 45:e2030207. [PMID: 39356923 DOI: 10.1590/1983-1447.2024.2030207.en] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify in the literature the factors associated with the inconsistent use of conservation by the young population. METHOD Systematic review that searched for studies in six data sources in June 2023, with no publication date or language restrictions. Materials were selected by two independent reviewers who individually screened observational studies by reading the title and abstract of the articles. The studies were assessed for methodological quality and narrative synthesis. RESULTS Of the 15,783 publications retrieved, nine were included. It was found that anal sex, not carrying a condom, low education, shame about buying condoms, drug use, early sexual debut and difficulties in negotiating condom use were factors associated with inconsistent condom use among the young population. CONCLUSION Multidimensional factors are associated with inconsistent condom use, permeated by sociodemographic, cultural and behavioral elements that challenge practices and policies aimed at promoting sexual and reproductive health, including the control of sexually transmitted infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Vitória Alencar
- Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gebru NM, James TG, Ahn S, Cheong J, Berry MS, Cook RL, Leeman RF. A Behavioral Economic Examination of Sexual Behaviors in the Era of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis via Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods. ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR 2024; 53:1541-1559. [PMID: 38472604 PMCID: PMC11124550 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-024-02822-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use may be associated with condom use decisions. The current investigation examined sexual decision-making in the context of PrEP among young adult men who have sex with men (MSM) between 18 and 30 years old, using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design. For the quantitative aim, 99 MSM currently taking PrEP (i.e., PrEP-experienced) and 140 MSM not currently taking PrEP (i.e., PrEP-naive) completed an online survey, including the Sexual Delay Discounting Task (SDDT), which captures likelihood of condom use. For the qualitative aim, 15 people from each group were interviewed about their (1) conceptualizations of risky sex and (2) ways they manage their sexual risk. Participants were, on average, 25.69 years old (SD = 3.07) and 64% White. Results from the quantitative aim revealed, controlling for covariates, PrEP-experienced participants exhibited significantly lower likelihood of (1) using an immediately available condom and (2) waiting for a delayed condom (i.e., sexual delay discounting) compared to PrEP-naive participants. Qualitative themes explaining what young adult MSM consider to be risky sex included: (1) any sex as risky sex, (2) risky sex as "sex without a conversation," and (3) risky sex as sex with risk for physical harm. Themes on ways young adult MSM manage sexual risk were classified as proactive, reactive, and passive. Results suggest that PrEP use is related to condom use decisions. Taken together, quantitative differences in sexual delay discounting, but qualitatively similar conceptualizations and management of risky sex, suggest that the SDDT may be a useful tool in sex research to capture processes (i.e., delay discounting) underlying sexual decision-making that may be missed by traditional self-reports. Implications of results, including potentially providing (good quality) condoms with every PrEP prescription, and future research topics are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nioud Mulugeta Gebru
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S. Main St., Box G-S121-3, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
- Department of Health Education and Behavior, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
- Southern HIV and Alcohol Research Consortium (SHARC), University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | - Tyler G James
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Seungjun Ahn
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - JeeWon Cheong
- Department of Health Education and Behavior, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Meredith S Berry
- Department of Health Education and Behavior, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Robert L Cook
- Southern HIV and Alcohol Research Consortium (SHARC), University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Robert F Leeman
- Department of Health Education and Behavior, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saavedra-Roa A, Vallejo-Medina P. A non-latex condom has no influence on male physiological sexual arousal. Int J Clin Health Psychol 2024; 24:100442. [PMID: 38348144 PMCID: PMC10859562 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objective Men do not use external condoms for several reasons, which can result in public health problems. One of these is related to Condom-Associated Erectile Problems. This study aimed to examine the sexual arousal response of heterosexual men when using an external condom made of synthetic resin type AT-10. Method A total of 82 Colombian young men (Mage = 23.17 years, SD = 3.04, age range = 18-30) participated in this experimental study. Two random groups (experimental and control; n = 41 each) were compared. The experimental group used condoms, whereas the control group did not. Fit and feel condom perceptions, initial erectile scores, age, and substance use were controlled for. Erection was measured while viewing a sexual video by using penile plethysmography and subjective arousal. Results The results, obtained from comparing the experimental group (using pre-erection condoms) with the control group (not using condoms), revealed no significant difference in both subjective and physiological sexual arousal. This suggests that pre-erection condoms do not have an effect on the erectile response. Discussion More research is needed in this area to provide treatment and clinical interventions or sexual and reproductive education to mitigate the occurrence of sexual dysfunction, unplanned pregnancies, or sexually transmitted infections. Also, research addresses public health issues related to the prevention and/or intervention of sexual risk behaviors and sexual dysfunctions, highlighting their significance in sexual education and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Saavedra-Roa
- SexLab KL - Human Sexual Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
| | - Pablo Vallejo-Medina
- SexLab KL - Human Sexual Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
- Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Department of Psychology and Education Sciences, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Flowers P, Vojt G, Pothoulaki M, Mapp F, Woode Owusu M, Estcourt C, Cassell JA, Saunders J. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to using self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infections and blood-borne viruses: Thematic analyses for intervention optimization. Br J Health Psychol 2023; 28:156-173. [PMID: 35918874 PMCID: PMC10086833 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and blood-borne viruses (BBVs) are widely offered. There are ongoing problems with reach and sample return rates. The packs have arisen without formal intervention development. This paper illustrates initial steps of an intervention optimization process to improve the packs. METHODS Eleven focus groups and seven interviews were conducted with convenience samples of patients recruited from sexual health clinics and members of the public (n = 56). To enable intervention optimization, firstly, we conducted an inductive appraisal of the behavioural system of using the pack to understand meaningful constituent behavioural domains. Subsequently, we conducted a thematic analysis of barriers and facilitators to enacting each sequential behavioural domain in preparation for future behaviour change wheel analysis. RESULTS Overall, we found that self-sampling packs were acceptable. Participants understood their overall logic and value as a pragmatic intervention that simultaneously facilitated and reduced barriers to individuals being tested for STIs and BBVs. However, at the level of each behavioural domain (e.g., reading leaflets, returning samples) problems with the pack were identified, as well as a series of potential optimizations, which might widen the reach of self-sampling and increase the return of viable samples. CONCLUSIONS This paper provides an example of a pragmatic approach to optimizing an intervention already widely offered globally. The paper demonstrates the added value health psychological approaches offer; conceptualizing interventions in behavioural terms, pinpointing granular behavioural problems amenable for systematic further improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Flowers
- School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Gabriele Vojt
- Department of Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Maria Pothoulaki
- Department of Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Fiona Mapp
- Department of Infection & Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Melvina Woode Owusu
- Department of Infection & Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Claudia Estcourt
- Department of Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jackie A Cassell
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK
| | - John Saunders
- Department of Infection & Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stone N, Bedford R, Newby K, Brown K, Jackson L, Bremner S, Morrison L, McGrath N, Nadarzynski T, Bayley J, Perry N, Graham C. Reducing new chlamydia infection among young men by promoting correct and consistent condom use: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial. (Preprint). JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 11:e35729. [PMID: 35947422 PMCID: PMC9403823 DOI: 10.2196/35729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The health, social, and economic costs of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) represent a major public health concern. Young people are considered one of the groups most at risk for acquiring and transmitting STIs. Correct and consistent condom use has been shown to be the most effective method for reducing STIs; however, condoms are often not used properly. Evidence shows that brief behavior change interventions that focus on skills, communication, and motivation to acquire safe sex practices should be adopted into routine care to reduce STIs. Funding for sexual health services in England has declined dramatically, so novel ways of reducing clinic attendance are being sought. The home-based intervention strategy (HIS-UK) to promote condom use among young men has shown promise in feasibility and pilot studies by demonstrating high acceptability of the intervention in participant and health professional feedback, including aiding men to find condoms they like and feel more confident when using condoms. Objective The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HIS-UK when compared to usual condom distribution care among young men. Methods The 3 trial arms consisting of “e-HIS” (HIS-UK delivered digitally), “ProHIS” (HIS-UK delivered face-to-face), and control condition (usual National Health Service [NHS] care) will be compared against the following 3 primary outcomes: the extent to which correct and consistent condom use is increased; improvement of condom use experiences (pleasure as well as fit and feel); and decrease in chlamydia test positivity. Eligibility criteria include men aged 16-25 years at risk of STIs through reporting of condom use errors (ie, breakage or slippage) or condomless penile-vaginal or penile-anal intercourse with casual or new sexual partners during the previous 3 months. Prospective participants will be recruited through targeted advertisements and an opportunistic direct approach at selected sexual health and genitourinary medicine services and university-associated health centers and general practitioner practices. Community and educational establishments will be used to further advertise the study and signpost men to recruitment sites. Participants will be randomly allocated to 1 of 3 trial arms. A repeated measures design will assess the parallel arms with baseline and 12 monthly follow-up questionnaires after intervention and 3 chlamydia screening points (baseline, 6, and 12 months). Results Recruitment commenced in March 2020. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the study was halted and has since reopened for recruitment in Summer 2021. A 30-month recruitment period is planned. Conclusions If effective and cost-effective, HIS-UK can be scaled up into routine NHS usual care to reduce both STI transmission in young people and pressure on NHS resources. This intervention may further encourage sexual health services to adopt digital technologies, allowing for them to become more widely available to young people while decreasing health inequalities and fear of stigmatization. Trial Registration ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN11400820; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11400820
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Stone
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Rowena Bedford
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Katie Newby
- Department of Psychology and Sports Science, Faculty of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine Brown
- Department of Psychology and Sports Science, Faculty of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Jackson
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Bremner
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Leanne Morrison
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Nuala McGrath
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Department of Social Statistics and Demography, Faculty of Economic, Social and Political Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Nadarzynski
- School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jake Bayley
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicky Perry
- University Hospitals Sussex NHS Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Cynthia Graham
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|