1
|
Chow EPF, Fairley CK, Kong FYS. STI pathogens in the oropharynx: update on screening and treatment. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2024; 37:35-45. [PMID: 38112085 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The rise in antimicrobial resistance in several STI pathogens such as Neisseria gonorrhoeae has become a public health threat as only one first-line treatment remains. Reducing screening interval for gonorrhoea and chlamydia in high-prevalence populations has been proposed to address antimicrobial stewardship, but this remains controversial. This review aimed to revisit the epidemiology of infections at the oropharynx and review the current screening recommendations and treatment guidelines in different populations. RECENT FINDINGS Emerging evidence suggests that the oropharynx is the primary anatomical site for gonorrhoea transmission but maybe not for chlamydia transmission. Most international guidelines recommend 3-monthly oropharyngeal gonorrhoea and chlamydia screening for high-prevalence populations (e.g. men who have sex with men) but not low-prevalence populations (e.g. heterosexuals) given the clinical and public health benefits of screening in low-prevalence populations are still unclear. Doxycycline remains the first-line treatment for oropharyngeal chlamydia in most guidelines. However, some countries have moved from dual therapy (ceftriaxone and azithromycin) to monotherapy (ceftriaxone) for oropharyngeal gonorrhoea treatment to address antimicrobial stewardship. SUMMARY The transmission of gonorrhoea and chlamydia is still not fully understood. Further work will be required to evaluate the benefits and harms of reducing screening in high-prevalence populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric P F Chow
- Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Christopher K Fairley
- Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University
| | - Fabian Y S Kong
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Philipova I, Levterova V, Simeonovski I, Kantardjiev T. High rate of fluoroquinolone resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae detected by molecular surveillance of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Bulgaria. BIOTECHNOL BIOTEC EQ 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2022.2146532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ivva Philipova
- Department of Microbiology, National Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases (NCIPD), Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Victoriya Levterova
- Department of Microbiology, National Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases (NCIPD), Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Ivan Simeonovski
- Department of Microbiology, National Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases (NCIPD), Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Todor Kantardjiev
- Department of Microbiology, National Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases (NCIPD), Sofia, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Unemo M, Ross J, Serwin AB, Gomberg M, Cusini M, Jensen JS. Background review for the '2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults'. Int J STD AIDS 2020; 32:108-126. [PMID: 33323071 DOI: 10.1177/0956462420948739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Gonorrhoea is a major public health concern globally. Increasing incidence and sporadic ceftriaxone-resistant cases, including treatment failures, are growing concerns. The 2020 European gonorrhoea guideline provides up-to-date evidence-based guidance regarding the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea. The updates and recommendations emphasize significantly increasing gonorrhoea incidence; broad indications for increased testing with validated and quality-assured nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and culture; dual antimicrobial therapy including high-dose ceftriaxone and azithromycin (ceftriaxone 1 g plus azithromycin 2 g) OR ceftriaxone 1 g monotherapy (ONLY in well-controlled settings, see guideline for details) for uncomplicated gonorrhoea when the antimicrobial susceptibility is unknown; recommendation of test of cure (TOC) in all gonorrhoea cases to ensure eradication of infection and identify resistance; and enhanced surveillance of treatment failures when recommended treatment regimens have been used. Improvements in access to appropriate testing, test performance, diagnostics, antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance and treatment, and follow-up of gonorrhoea patients are essential in controlling gonorrhoea and to mitigate the emergence and/or spread of ceftriaxone resistance and multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant gonorrhoea. This review provides the detailed background, evidence base and discussions, for the 2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults (Unemo M, et al. Int J STD AIDS. 2020).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Unemo
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Gonorrhoea and other STIs, National Reference Laboratory for STIs, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology, Örebro University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Jdc Ross
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - A B Serwin
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Poland
| | - M Gomberg
- Moscow Scientific and Practical Center of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology, Moscow, Russia
| | - M Cusini
- Department of Dermatology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - J S Jensen
- Infection Preparedness, Research Unit for Reproductive Tract Microbiology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chow EPF, Maddaford K, Hocking JS, Bradshaw CS, Wigan R, Chen MY, Howden BP, Williamson DA, Fairley CK. An open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial of antiseptic mouthwash versus antibiotics for oropharyngeal gonorrhoea treatment (OMEGA2). Sci Rep 2020; 10:19386. [PMID: 33168910 PMCID: PMC7652834 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76184-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
New treatments for oropharyngeal gonorrhoea are required to address rising antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to examine the efficacy of a 14-day course of mouthwash twice daily compared to standard treatment (antibiotic) for the treatment of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea. The OMEGA2 trial was a parallel-group and open-labelled randomised controlled trial among men with untreated oropharyngeal gonorrhoea that was conducted between September 2018 and February 2020 at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre in Australia. Men were randomised to the intervention (rinsing, gargling and spraying mouthwash twice daily for 14 days) or control (standard treatment) arm and followed for 28 days. Participants in both arms were advised to abstain from sex and kissing with anyone for 14 days after enrolment. Oropharyngeal swabs were collected at baseline, Day 14 and Day 28 and tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) and culture. The primary outcome was the detection of oropharyngeal N. gonorrhoeae by NAAT at Day 14 after treatment. This trial was registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001380280). This trial stopped early due to a high failure rate in the mouthwash arm. Twelve men were randomly assigned to either mouthwash (n = 6) or standard treatment (n = 6). Of the 11 men who returned at Day 14, the cure rate for oropharyngeal gonorrhoea in the mouthwash arm was 20% (95% CI 1-72%; 1/5) and in the standard treatment arm was 100% (95% CI 54-100%; 6/6). A 14-day course of mouthwash failed to cure a high proportion of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric P F Chow
- Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia.
| | - Kate Maddaford
- Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jane S Hocking
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Catriona S Bradshaw
- Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rebecca Wigan
- Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Marcus Y Chen
- Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Benjamin P Howden
- Microbiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Deborah A Williamson
- Microbiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Microbiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher K Fairley
- Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Unemo M, Ross J, Serwin AB, Gomberg M, Cusini M, Jensen JS. 2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults. Int J STD AIDS 2020:956462420949126. [PMID: 33121366 DOI: 10.1177/0956462420949126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Gonorrhoea is a major public health concern globally. Increasing incidence and sporadic ceftriaxone-resistant cases, including treatment failures, are growing concerns. The 2020 European gonorrhoea guideline provides up-to-date evidence-based guidance regarding the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea. The updates and recommendations emphasize significantly increasing gonorrhoea incidence; broad indications for increased testing with validated and quality-assured nucleic acid amplification tests and culture; dual antimicrobial therapy including high-dose ceftriaxone and azithromycin (ceftriaxone 1 g plus azithromycin 2 g) OR ceftriaxone 1 g monotherapy (ONLY in well-controlled settings, see guideline for details) for uncomplicated gonorrhoea when the antimicrobial susceptibility is unknown; recommendation of test of cure (TOC) in all gonorrhoea cases to ensure eradication of infection and identify resistance; and enhanced surveillance of treatment failures when recommended treatment regimens have been used. Improvements in access to appropriate testing, test performance, diagnostics, antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance and treatment, and follow-up of gonorrhoea patients are essential in controlling gonorrhoea and to mitigate the emergence and/or spread of ceftriaxone resistance and multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant gonorrhoea. For detailed background, evidence base and discussions, see the background review for the present 2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults (Unemo M, et al. Int J STD AIDS. 2020).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Unemo
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Gonorrhoea and other STIs, National Reference Laboratory for STIs, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology, Örebro University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Jdc Ross
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - A B Serwin
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Poland
| | - M Gomberg
- Moscow Scientific and Practical Center of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology, Moscow, Russia
| | - M Cusini
- Department of Dermatology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - J S Jensen
- Infection Preparedness, Research Unit for Reproductive Tract Microbiology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ong JJ, Wi T, Hughes G, Williamson DA, Mayaud P, Chow EPF. Gonorrhoea: tackling the global epidemic in the era of rising antimicrobial resistance. Sex Health 2020; 16:397-400. [PMID: 32172790 DOI: 10.1071/sh19121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
This Special Issue of Sexual Health aims to collate the latest evidence base focussed on understanding the current epidemic and transmission of gonorrhoea, choice of treatment, molecular epidemiology application, concerns about antimicrobial resistance and alternative prevention and control for gonorrhoea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason J Ong
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic. 3053, Australia; and Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK; and Corresponding author.
| | - Teodora Wi
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva 1211, Switzerland
| | - Gwenda Hughes
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale NW9 5EQ, UK
| | - Deborah A Williamson
- Microbiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, The University of Melbourne at The Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia
| | - Philippe Mayaud
- Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Eric P F Chow
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic. 3053, Australia; and Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Carlton, Vic. 3053, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Richardson D, Lewis DA, Jeoffreys NJ, Couldwell DL. Mycoplasma genitalium coinfection in men with symptomatic gonococcal urethritis. Sex Transm Infect 2020; 97:363-367. [PMID: 32912933 DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2020-054529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES International guidelines recommend Mycoplasma genitalium testing, preferably using an assay to detect macrolide resistance-associated mutations, for men presenting with non-gonococcal urethritis, but there is no specific guidance on such testing for men with gonococcal urethritis. METHODS This study aimed to estimate the proportion of men with gonococcal urethritis who have coinfection with M. genitalium through a retrospective analysis of cases of symptomatic urethral gonorrhoea at Western Sydney Sexual Health Centre in 2017 and 2018. RESULTS Fourteen of 184 (7.6%, 95% CI 3.7 to 11.5) men with gonococcal urethritis had M. genitalium detected in the urine at the time of presentation. No demographic or behavioural factors predicted M. genitalium coinfection. Coinfection with urethral Chlamydia trachomatis was detected in 29 of 184 (15.8%, 95% CI 10.5 to 21.1). All five men with macrolide-resistant M. genitalium detected returned for treatment with moxifloxacin at a median of 8 days (range 5-16 days) after presentation and treatment of gonorrhoea; three of five were documented to remain symptomatic at this visit. CONCLUSION Although M. genitalium coinfection is less common than chlamydia among men with symptomatic gonococcal urethritis, M. genitalium testing, using an assay to detect macrolide resistance, will potentially reduce symptom duration particularly for men with macrolide-resistant infections, but may not be justifiable on cost-benefit analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Richardson
- Western Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Western Sydney Local Health District, Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David A Lewis
- Western Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Western Sydney Local Health District, Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia.,Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity and Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney Medical School, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Neisha J Jeoffreys
- Department of Microbiology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Deborah L Couldwell
- Western Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Western Sydney Local Health District, Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia.,Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity and Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney Medical School, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|