1
|
Lala F, Chiyo PI, Omondi P, Okita-Ouma B, Kanga E, Koskei M, Tiller L, Morris AW, Severud WJ, Bump JK. Influence of infrastructure, ecology, and underpass-dimensions on multi-year use of Standard Gauge Railway underpasses by mammals in Tsavo, Kenya. Sci Rep 2022; 12:5698. [PMID: 35383206 PMCID: PMC8983743 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09555-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Rail and road infrastructure is essential for economic growth and development but can cause a gradual loss in biodiversity and degradation of ecosystem function and services. We assessed the influence of underpass dimensions, fencing, proximity to water and roads, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), presence of other species and livestock on underpass use by large and medium-sized mammals. Results revealed hyenas and leopards used the underpasses more than expected whereas giraffes and antelopes used the underpasses less than expected. Generalized linear mixed-effects models revealed that underpass height influenced use by wildlife, with several species preferring to use taller underpasses. Electric fencing increased underpass use by funneling species towards underpasses, except for elephants and black-backed jackal for which it reduced underpass passage. We also found that the use of underpasses by livestock reduced the probability of use by nearly 50% for wildlife species. Carnivore species were more likely to cross underpasses used by their prey. Buffalo, livestock, and hyenas used underpasses characterized by vegetation with higher NDVI and near water sources while baboons, dik-diks and antelope avoided underpasses with high NDVI. Our findings suggest a need for diverse and comprehensive approaches for mitigating the negative impacts of rail on African wildlife.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fredrick Lala
- Wildlife Research and Training Institute, P.O. Box 842-20117, Naivasha, Kenya. .,University of Minnesota, 2003 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN, 55108-6074, USA.
| | - Patrick I Chiyo
- Department of Biology, Duke University, P.O. Box 90338, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Patrick Omondi
- Wildlife Research and Training Institute, P.O. Box 842-20117, Naivasha, Kenya
| | | | - Erustus Kanga
- Ministry of Tourism and Wildlife, P. O. Box 41394, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya
| | - Michael Koskei
- Save the Elephants, P.O. Box 54667, Nairobi, 00200, Kenya
| | - Lydia Tiller
- Save the Elephants, P.O. Box 54667, Nairobi, 00200, Kenya
| | - Aaron W Morris
- University of Minnesota, 2003 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN, 55108-6074, USA
| | - William J Severud
- University of Minnesota, 2003 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN, 55108-6074, USA
| | - Joseph K Bump
- University of Minnesota, 2003 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN, 55108-6074, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nieman WA, Wilgen BW, Radloff FGT, Tambling CJ, Leslie AJ. The effects of fire frequency on vegetation structure and mammal assemblages in a savannah‐woodland system. Afr J Ecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/aje.12971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Willem A. Nieman
- Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology Stellenbosch University Matieland South Africa
| | - Brian W. Wilgen
- Department of Botany and Zoology Centre for Invasion Biology Stellenbosch University Matieland South Africa
| | - Frans G. T. Radloff
- Department of Conservation and Marine Science Cape Peninsula University of Technology Cape Town South Africa
| | - Craig J. Tambling
- Department of Zoology and Entomology University of Fort Hare Alice South Africa
| | - Alison J. Leslie
- Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology Stellenbosch University Matieland South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The development of ecotourism involving wild animals in Russia is overlooked despite the fact that the country’s territory is significant not only in terms of area but also in terms of the diversity of its flora and fauna. A significant part of Russia’s territory has a low population density, especially beyond the Ural ridge. It retains its natural primeval nature, which can contribute to the development of ecotourism. Initial attempts have been made to develop this, mainly in the European part (Tatarstan, Murmansk Region, the Baltic Sea, Baikal, Altai), but the commercial use of wild animals within ecotourism programs, including the ones in Siberia and the Far East, has not been discussed. This work focuses on the basics of launching ecotourism in the industrial region of Siberia (Kuzbass, Russia) as part of the Alcesalces conservation program.
Collapse
|