The drifting human genome

The Role of Cell Membrane Information Reception, Processing, and Communication in the Structure and Function of Multicellular Tissue

Investigations of information dynamics in eukaryotic cells focus almost exclusively on heritable information in the genome. Gene networks are modeled as “central processors” that receive, analyze, and respond to intracellular and extracellular signals with the nucleus described as a cell’s control center. Here, we present a model in which cellular information is a distributed system that includes non-genomic information processing in the cell membrane that may quantitatively exceed that of the genome. Within this model, the nucleus largely acts a source of macromolecules and processes information needed to synchronize their production with temporal variations in demand. However, the nucleus cannot produce microsecond responses to acute, life-threatening perturbations and cannot spatially resolve incoming signals or direct macromolecules to the cellular regions where they are needed. In contrast, the cell membrane, as the interface with its environment, can rapidly detect, process, and respond to external threats and opportunities through the large amounts of potential information encoded within the transmembrane ion gradient. Our model proposes environmental information is detected by specialized protein gates within ion-specific transmembrane channels. When the gate receives a specific environmental signal, the ion channel opens and the received information is communicated into the cell via flow of a specific ion species (i.e., K⁺, Na⁺, Cl⁻, Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺) along electrochemical gradients. The fluctuation of an ion concentration within the cytoplasm adjacent to the membrane channel can elicit an immediate, local response by altering the location and function of peripheral membrane proteins. Signals that affect a larger surface area of the cell membrane and/or persist over a prolonged time period will produce similarly cytoplasmic changes on larger spatial and time scales. We propose that as the amplitude, spatial extent, and duration of changes in cytoplasmic ion concentrations increase, the information can be communicated to the nucleus and other intracellular structure through ion flows along elements of the cytoskeleton to the centrosome (via microtubules) or proteins in the nuclear membrane (via microfilaments). These dynamics add spatial and temporal context to the more well-recognized information communication from the cell membrane to the nucleus following ligand binding to membrane receptors. Here, the signal is transmitted and amplified through transduction by the canonical molecular (e.g., Mitogen Activated Protein Kinases (MAPK) pathways. Cytoplasmic diffusion allows this information to be broadly distributed to intracellular organelles but at the cost of loss of spatial and temporal information also contained in ligand binding.

Strong links between genomic and anatomical diversity in both mammalian olfactory chemosensory systems

Mammalian olfaction comprises two chemosensory systems: the odorant-detecting main olfactory system (MOS) and the pheromone-detecting vomeronasal system (VNS). Mammals are diverse in their anatomical and genomic emphases on olfactory chemosensation, including the loss or reduction of these systems in some orders. Despite qualitative evidence linking the genomic evolution of the olfactory systems to specific functions and phenotypes, little work has quantitatively tested whether the genomic aspects of the mammalian olfactory chemosensory systems are correlated to anatomical diversity. We show that the genomic and anatomical variation in these systems is tightly linked in both the VNS and the MOS, though the signature of selection is different in each system. Specifically, the MOS appears to vary based on absolute organ and gene family size while the VNS appears to vary according to the relative proportion of functional genes and relative anatomical size and complexity. Furthermore, there is little evidence that these two systems are evolving in a linked fashion. The relationships between genomic and anatomical diversity strongly support a role for natural selection in shaping both the anatomical and genomic evolution of the olfactory chemosensory systems in mammals.

The microevolution of V1r vomeronasal receptor genes in mice

Vomeronasal sensitivity is important for detecting intraspecific pheromonal cues as well as environmental odorants and is involved in mating, social interaction, and other daily activities of many vertebrates. Two large families of seven-transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptors, V1rs and V2rs, bind to various ligands to initiate vomeronasal signal transduction. Although the macroevolution of V1r and V2r genes has been well characterized throughout vertebrates, especially mammals, little is known about their microevolutionary patterns, which hampers a clear understanding of the evolutionary forces behind the rapid evolutionary turnover of V1r and V2r genes and the great diversity in receptor repertoire across species. Furthermore, the role of divergent vomeronasal perception in enhancing premating isolation and maintaining species identity has not been evaluated. Here we sequenced 44 V1r genes and 25 presumably neutral noncoding regions in 14 wild-caught mice belonging to Mus musculus and M. domesticus, two closely related species with strong yet incomplete reproductive isolation. We found that nucleotide changes in V1rs are generally under weak purifying selection and that only ∼5% of V1rs may have been subject to positive selection that promotes nonsynonymous substitutions. Consistent with the low functional constraints on V1rs, 18 of the 44 V1rs have null alleles segregating in one or both species. Together, our results demonstrate that, despite occasional actions of positive selection, the evolution of V1rs is in a large part shaped by purifying selection and random drift. These findings have broad implications for understanding the driving forces of rapid gene turnovers that are often observed in the evolution of large gene families.

Gene copy-number polymorphism in nature

Differences between individuals in the copy-number of whole genes have been found in every multicellular species examined thus far. Such differences result in unique complements of protein-coding genes in all individuals, and have been shown to underlie adaptive phenotypic differences. Here, we review the evidence for copy-number variants (CNVs), focusing on the methods used to detect them and the molecular mechanisms responsible for generating this type of variation. Although there are multiple technical and computational challenges inherent to these experimental methods, next-generation sequencing technologies are making such experiments accessible in any system with a sequenced genome. We further discuss the connection between copy-number variation within species and copy-number divergence between species, showing that these values are exactly what one would expect from similar comparisons of nucleotide polymorphism and divergence. We conclude by reviewing the growing body of evidence for natural selection on copy-number variants. While it appears that most genic CNVs--especially deletions-are quickly eliminated by selection, there are now multiple studies demonstrating a strong link between copy-number differences at specific genes and phenotypic differences in adaptive traits. We argue that a complete understanding of the molecular basis for adaptive natural selection necessarily includes the study of copy-number variation.

The evolutionary significance of copy number variation in the human genome

Copy number variation provides the raw material for gene family expansion and diversification, which is an important evolutionary force. Moreover, copy number variants (CNVs) can influence gene transcriptional and translational levels and have been associated with complex disease susceptibility. Therefore, natural selection may have affected at least some of the greater than one thousand CNVs thus far discovered among the genomes of phenotypically normal humans. While identifying and understanding particular instances of natural selection may shed light on important aspects of human evolutionary history, our ability to analyze CNVs in traditional population genetic frameworks has been limited. However, progress has been made by adapting some of these frameworks for use with copy number data. Moving forward, these efforts will be aided by non-human organism studies of the population genetics of copy number variation, and by more direct comparisons of within-species copy number variation and between-species copy number fixation.

Copy number variation and evolution in humans and chimpanzees

Copy number variants (CNVs) underlie many aspects of human phenotypic diversity and provide the raw material for gene duplication and gene family expansion. However, our understanding of their evolutionary significance remains limited. We performed comparative genomic hybridization on a single human microarray platform to identify CNVs among the genomes of 30 humans and 30 chimpanzees as well as fixed copy number differences between species. We found that human and chimpanzee CNVs occur in orthologous genomic regions far more often than expected by chance and are strongly associated with the presence of highly homologous intrachromosomal segmental duplications. By adapting population genetic analyses for use with copy number data, we identified functional categories of genes that have likely evolved under purifying or positive selection for copy number changes. In particular, duplications and deletions of genes with inflammatory response and cell proliferation functions may have been fixed by positive selection and involved in the adaptive phenotypic differentiation of humans and chimpanzees.

Extensive copy-number variation of the human olfactory receptor gene family

As much as a quarter of the human genome has been reported to vary in copy number between individuals, including regions containing about half of the members of the olfactory receptor (OR) gene family. We have undertaken a detailed study of copy-number variation of ORs to elucidate the selective and mechanistic forces acting on this gene family and the true impact of copy-number variation on human OR repertoires. We argue that the properties of copy-number variants (CNVs) and other sets of large genomic regions violate the assumptions of statistical methods that are commonly used in the assessment of gene enrichment. Using more appropriate methods, we provide evidence that OR enrichment in CNVs is not due to positive selection but is because of OR preponderance in segmentally duplicated regions, which are known to be frequently copy-number variable, and because purifying selection against CNVs is lower in OR-containing regions than in regions containing essential genes. We also combine multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and PCR to assay the copy numbers of 37 candidate CNV ORs in a panel of approximately 50 human individuals. We confirm copy-number variation of 18 ORs but find no variation in this human-diversity panel for 16 other ORs, highlighting the caveat that reported intervals often overrepresent true CNVs. The copy-number variation we describe is likely to underpin significant variation in olfactory abilities among human individuals. Finally, we show that both homology-based and homology-independent processes have played a recent role in remodeling the OR family.