The role of members of the pertussis toxin-sensitive family of G proteins in coupling receptors to the activation of the G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channel

Insights into the Current and Possible Future Use of Opioid Antagonists in Relation to Opioid-Induced Constipation and Dysbiosis

Opioid receptor agonists, particularly those that activate µ-opioid receptors (MORs), are essential analgesic agents for acute or chronic mild to severe pain treatment. However, their use has raised concerns including, among others, intestinal dysbiosis. In addition, growing data on constipation-evoked intestinal dysbiosis have been reported. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) creates an obstacle to continuing treatment with opioid analgesics. When non-opioid therapies fail to overcome the OIC, opioid antagonists with peripheral, fast first-pass metabolism, and gastrointestinal localized effects remain the drug of choice for OIC, which are discussed here. At first glance, their use seems to only be restricted to constipation, however, recent data on OIC-related dysbiosis and its contribution to the appearance of several opioid side effects has garnered a great of attention from researchers. Peripheral MORs have also been considered as a future target for opioid analgesics with limited central side effects. The properties of MOR antagonists counteracting OIC, and with limited influence on central and possibly peripheral MOR-mediated antinociception, will be highlighted. A new concept is also proposed for developing gut-selective MOR antagonists to treat or restore OIC while keeping peripheral antinociception unaffected. The impact of opioid antagonists on OIC in relation to changes in the gut microbiome is included.

Generation of Gαi knock-out HEK293 cells illuminates Gαi-coupling diversity of GPCRs

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are pivotal cell membrane proteins that sense extracellular molecules and activate cellular responses. The G-protein α subunit i (Gαi) family represents the most common GPCR-coupling partner and consists of eight subunits with distinct signaling properties. However, analyzing the coupling pattern has been challenging owing to endogenous expression of the Gαi subunits in virtually all cell lines. Here, we generate a HEK293 cell line lacking all Gαi subunits, which enables the measurement of GPCR-Gαi coupling upon transient re-expression of a specific Gαi subunit. We profile Gαi-coupling selectivity across 11 GPCRs by measuring ligand-induced inhibitory activity for cAMP accumulation. The coupling profiles are then classified into three clusters, representing those preferentially coupled to Gαz, those to Gαo, and those with unapparent selectivity. These results indicate that individual Gαi-coupled GPCRs fine-tune Gαi signaling by exerting coupling preference at the Gαi-subunit level.

Mechanisms and Regulation of Neuronal GABAB Receptor-Dependent Signaling

γ-Aminobutyric acid B receptors (GABA_BRs) are broadly expressed throughout the central nervous system where they play an important role in regulating neuronal excitability and synaptic transmission. GABA_BRs are G protein-coupled receptors that mediate slow and sustained inhibitory actions via modulation of several downstream effector enzymes and ion channels. GABA_BRs are obligate heterodimers that associate with diverse arrays of proteins to form modular complexes that carry out distinct physiological functions. GABA_BR-dependent signaling is fine-tuned and regulated through a multitude of mechanisms that are relevant to physiological and pathophysiological states. This review summarizes the current knowledge on GABA_BR signal transduction and discusses key factors that influence the strength and sensitivity of GABA_BR-dependent signaling in neurons.

Functional characterization of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B serotonin receptor signaling through G-protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channels in a fluorescence-based membrane potential assay

The 5-HT_1A and 5-HT_1B serotonin receptors are abundantly expressed in the CNS and constitute validated as well as putative drug targets in a variety of psychiatric and cognitive disorders, alcoholism/addiction, pain and migraine. In the present study we have characterized the functional properties of human 5-HT_1A and 5-HT_1B stably co-expressed with the human G-protein-activated inwardly rectifying K⁺ channel 2 (GIRK2) in HEK293 cells in the fluorescence-based FLIPR® Membrane Potential Blue (FMP) assay. Serotonin and other agonists induced robust decreases in fluorescence levels in the 5-HT_1A/GIRK2- and 5-HT_1B/GIRK2-HEK293 cells in a concentration-dependent manner in the assay, and these responses could be inhibited by selective 5-HT_1A/5-HT_1B antagonists and by the Gα_i/o-protein inhibitor pertussis toxin (PTX). Five additional stable HEK293 cell lines co-expressing 5-HT_1A or 5-HT_1B with GIRK2 and one of the PTX-insensitive Gα_i/o-subunit mutants Gα_i1^C351I, Gα_i2^C352I and Gα_o1^C351I were constructed, and 5-HT_1A/5-HT_1B-mediated responses through these specific Gα_i/o-subunits were measured in these cells pretreated with PTX in the FMP assay. The functional properties of 16 reference 5-HT₁ agonists were characterized at the seven cell lines, which constitutes the most detailed pharmacological profiling and comparison of 5-HT_1A and 5-HT_1B receptor signaling in the same assay published to date. We propose that this approach to assay 5-HT₁-mediated signaling through endogenous Gα_i/o-proteins in HEK293 cells or through specific Gα_i/o-subunits in a fairly high-throughput manner holds some advantages to other functional assays for Gα_i/o-coupled receptors. The assay will facilitate detailed profiling of the Gα_i/o- and Gβγ-mediated signaling of 5-HT_1A and 5-HT_1B at the molecular level, and it could also be used to identify novel modulators for the receptors.

Activation of HIF-1α by δ-Opioid Receptors Induces COX-2 Expression in Breast Cancer Cells and Leads to Paracrine Activation of Vascular Endothelial Cells

Opioids promote tumor angiogenesis in mammary malignancies, but the underlying signaling mechanism is largely unknown. The current study investigated the hypothesis that stimulation of δ-opioid receptors (DOR) in breast cancer (BCa) cells activates the hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), which triggers synthesis and release of diverse angiogenic factors. Immunoblotting revealed that incubation of human MCF-7 and T47D breast cancer cells with the DOR agonist d-Ala²,d-Leu⁵-enkephalin (DADLE) resulted in a transient accumulation and thus activation of HIF-1α DADLE-induced HIF-1α activation preceded PI3K/Akt stimulation and was blocked by the DOR antagonist naltrindole and naloxone, pertussis toxin, different phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, and the Akt inhibitor Akti-1/2. Whereas DADLE exposure had no effect on the expression and secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in BCa cells, an increased abundance of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and release of prostaglandin E2 (PGE₂) was detected. DADLE-induced COX-2 expression was also observed in three-dimensional cultured MCF-7 cells and impaired by PI3K/Akt inhibitors and the HIF-1α inhibitor echinomycin. Supernatant from DADLE-treated MCF-7 cells triggered sprouting of endothelial (END) cells, which was blocked when MCF-7 cells were pretreated with echinomycin or the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib. Also no sprouting was observed when END cells were exposed to the PGE₂ receptor antagonist PF-04418948. The findings together indicate that DOR stimulation in BCa cells leads to PI3K/Akt-dependent HIF-1α activation and COX-2 expression, which trigger END cell sprouting by paracrine activation of PGE₂ receptors. These findings provide a potential mechanism of opioid-driven tumor angiogenesis and thus therapeutic targets to combat the tumor-angiogenic opioid effect. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Opioids are indispensable analgesics for treating cancer-related pain. However, opioids were found to promote tumor growth and metastasis, which questions the use of these potent pain-relieving drugs in cancer patients. Enhanced tumor vascularization after opioid treatment implies that tumor progression results from angiogenic opioid effects. Thus, understanding the signaling mechanism of opioid-driven tumor angiogenesis helps to identify therapeutic targets to combat these undesired tumor effects. The present study reveals that stimulation of δ-opioid receptors in breast cancer cells leads to an activation of HIF-1α and expression of COX-2 via PI3K/Akt stimulation, which results in a paracrine activation of vascular endothelial cells by prostaglandin E₂ receptors.

Mutual action by Gγ and Gβ for optimal activation of GIRK channels in a channel subunit-specific manner

The tetrameric G protein-gated K⁺ channels (GIRKs) mediate inhibitory effects of neurotransmitters that activate G_i/o-coupled receptors. GIRKs are activated by binding of the Gβγ dimer, via contacts with Gβ. Gγ underlies membrane targeting of Gβγ, but has not been implicated in channel gating. We observed that, in Xenopus oocytes, expression of Gγ alone activated homotetrameric GIRK1* and heterotetrameric GIRK1/3 channels, without affecting the surface expression of GIRK or Gβ. Gγ and Gβ acted interdependently: the effect of Gγ required the presence of ambient Gβ and was enhanced by low doses of coexpressed Gβ, whereas excess of either Gβ or Gγ imparted suboptimal activation, possibly by sequestering the other subunit “away” from the channel. The unique distal C-terminus of GIRK1, G1-dCT, was important but insufficient for Gγ action. Notably, GIRK2 and GIRK1/2 were not activated by Gγ. Our results suggest that Gγ regulates GIRK1* and GIRK1/3 channel’s gating, aiding Gβ to trigger the channel’s opening. We hypothesize that Gγ helps to relax the inhibitory effect of a gating element (“lock”) encompassed, in part, by the G1-dCT; GIRK2 acts to occlude the effect of Gγ, either by setting in motion the same mechanism as Gγ, or by triggering an opposing gating effect.

Differential effects of inhibitory G protein isoforms on G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+ currents in adult murine atria

G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K⁺ (GIRK) channels are the major inwardly rectifying K⁺ currents in cardiac atrial myocytes and an important determinant of atrial electrophysiology. Inhibitory G protein α-subunits can both mediate activation via acetylcholine but can also suppress basal currents in the absence of agonist. We studied this phenomenon using whole cell patch clamping in murine atria from mice with global genetic deletion of Gα_i2, combined deletion of Gα_i1/Gα_i3, and littermate controls. We found that mice with deletion of Gα_i2 had increased basal and agonist-activated currents, particularly in the right atria while in contrast those with Gα_i1/Gα_i3 deletion had reduced currents. Mice with global genetic deletion of Gα_i2 had decreased action potential duration. Tissue preparations of the left atria studied with a multielectrode array from Gα_i2 knockout mice showed a shorter effective refractory period, with no change in conduction velocity, than littermate controls. Transcriptional studies revealed increased expression of GIRK channel subunit genes in Gα_i2 knockout mice. Thus different G protein isoforms have differential effects on GIRK channel behavior and paradoxically Gα_i2 act to increase basal and agonist-activated GIRK currents. Deletion of Gα_i2 is potentially proarrhythmic in the atria.

A live cell assay of GPCR coupling allows identification of optogenetic tools for controlling Go and Gi signaling

Background

Animal opsins are light-sensitive G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that enable optogenetic control over the major heterotrimeric G-protein signaling pathways in animal cells. As such, opsins have potential applications in both biomedical research and therapy. Selecting the opsin with the best balance of activity and selectivity for a given application requires knowing their ability to couple to a full range of relevant Gα subunits. We present the GsX assay, a set of tools based on chimeric Gs subunits that transduce coupling of opsins to diverse G proteins into increases in cAMP levels,  measured with a real-time reporter in living cells. We use this assay to compare coupling to Gi/o/t across a panel of natural and chimeric opsins selected for potential application in gene therapy for retinal degeneration.

Results

Of the opsins tested, wild-type human rod opsin had the highest activity for chimeric Gs proxies for Gi and Gt (Gsi and Gst) and was matched in Go proxy (Gso) activity only by a human rod opsin/scallop opsin chimera. Rod opsin drove roughly equivalent responses via Gsi, Gso, and Gst, while cone opsins showed much lower activities with Gso than Gsi or Gst, and a human rod opsin/amphioxus opsin chimera demonstrated higher activity with Gso than with Gsi or Gst. We failed to detect activity for opsin chimeras bearing three intracellular fragments of mGluR6, and observed unexpectedly complex response profiles for scallop and amphioxus opsins thought to be specialized for Go.

Conclusions

These results identify rod opsin as the most potent non-selective Gi/o/t-coupled opsin, long-wave sensitive cone opsin as the best for selectively activating Gi/t over Go, and a rod opsin/amphioxus opsin chimera as the best choice for selectively activating Go over Gi/t.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0475-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Canonical and noncanonical g-protein signaling helps coordinate actin dynamics to promote macrophage phagocytosis of zymosan

Both chemotaxis and phagocytosis depend upon actin-driven cell protrusions and cell membrane remodeling. While chemoattractant receptors rely upon canonical G-protein signaling to activate downstream effectors, whether such signaling pathways affect phagocytosis is contentious. Here, we report that Gαi nucleotide exchange and signaling helps macrophages coordinate the recognition, capture, and engulfment of zymosan bioparticles. We show that zymosan exposure recruits F-actin, Gαi proteins, and Elmo1 to phagocytic cups and early phagosomes. Zymosan triggered an increase in intracellular Ca(2+) that was partially sensitive to Gαi nucleotide exchange inhibition and expression of GTP-bound Gαi recruited Elmo1 to the plasma membrane. Reducing GDP-Gαi nucleotide exchange, decreasing Gαi expression, pharmacologically interrupting Gβγ signaling, or reducing Elmo1 expression all impaired phagocytosis, while favoring the duration that Gαi remained GTP bound promoted it. Our studies demonstrate that targeting heterotrimeric G-protein signaling offers opportunities to enhance or retard macrophage engulfment of phagocytic targets such as zymosan.

Role of p53-dependent placental apoptosis in the reproductive and developmental toxicities of caffeine in rodents

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of placental apoptosis in mediating the reproductive and developmental toxicity of caffeine in rodents. Female Kunming mice were treated with caffeine (60, 120 and 240 mg/kg per day) before and during pregnancy. The conception rate, maternal bodyweight gain, placental weight and indices of fetal developmental, including the rate of intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR; i.e. the actual number of fetuses exhibiting IUGR as a percentage of the total number of fetuses), were determined on gestational day (GD) 18. Female Wistar rats were treated with caffeine (20, 60 and 180 mg/kg per day) from GD11 to GD20. The IUGR rate, maternal plasma angiotensin (Ang) II and prolactin concentrations, placental pathology, expression of angiotensin AT(1) and AT(2) receptors and apoptosis-related proteins were measured on GD20. In mice, caffeine treatment dose-dependently reduced the total conception rate, delayed conception and decreased maternal bodyweight gain, placental weight, fetal bodyweight and fetal body and tail lengths, whereas the IUGR rate was increased. In rats, caffeine treatment dose-dependently decreased placental weight and fetal bodyweight and increased the IUGR rate. Abnormal placental structures and decreased maternal plasma prolactin concentrations were observed following 180 mg/kg per day caffeine treatment, which resulted in increases in renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activity, including maternal plasma AngII concentrations and placental AT(1B) and AT(2) receptor expression, and Bax and p53 expression, but decreases in placental Bcl-2 expression. On the basis of the results of the present study, it appears that caffeine ingestion has detrimental effects on the reproductive system and fetal development in rodents that are associated with chronic activation of the maternal and placental RAS, and induction of p53-dependent placental apoptosis.

The Role of Inhibitory G Proteins and Regulators of G Protein Signaling in the in vivo Control of Heart Rate and Predisposition to Cardiac Arrhythmias

Inhibitory heterotrimeric G proteins and the control of heart rate. The activation of cell signaling pathways involving inhibitory heterotrimeric G proteins acts to slow the heart rate via modulation of ion channels. A large number of Regulators of G protein signalings (RGSs) can act as GTPase accelerating proteins to inhibitory G proteins and thus it is important to understand the network of RGS\G-protein interaction. We will review our recent findings on in vivo heart rate control in mice with global genetic deletion of various inhibitory G protein alpha subunits. We will discuss potential central and peripheral contributions to the phenotype and the controversies in the literature.

GABAB receptor coupling to G-proteins and ion channels

GABA(B) receptors have been found to play a key role in regulating membrane excitability and synaptic transmission in the brain. The GABA(B) receptor is a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) that associates with a subset of G-proteins (pertussis toxin sensitive Gi/o family), that in turn regulate specific ion channels and trigger cAMP cascades. In this review, we describe the relationships between the GABA(B) receptor, its effectors and associated proteins that mediate GABA(B) receptor function within the brain. We discuss a unique feature of the GABA(B) receptor, the requirement for heterodimerization to produce functional receptors, as well as an increasing body of evidence that suggests GABA(B) receptors comprise a macromolecular signaling heterocomplex, critical for efficient targeting and function of the receptors. Within this complex, GABA(B) receptors associate specifically with Gi/o G-proteins that regulate voltage-gated Ca(2+) (Ca(V)) channels, G-protein activated inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels, and adenylyl cyclase. Numerous studies have revealed that lipid rafts, scaffold proteins, targeting motifs in the receptor, and regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins also contribute to the function of GABA(B) receptors and affect cellular processes such as receptor trafficking and activity-dependent desensitization. This complex regulation of GABA(B) receptors in the brain may provide opportunities for new ways to regulate GABA-dependent inhibition in normal and diseased states of the nervous system.

Boolean modeling of transcriptome data reveals novel modes of heterotrimeric G-protein action

Classical mechanisms of heterotrimeric G-protein signaling are observed to function in regulation of the transcriptome. Conversely, many theoretical regulatory modes of the G-protein are not manifested in the transcriptomes we investigate.

A new mechanism of G-protein signaling is revealed, in which the β subunit regulates gene expression identically in the presence or absence of the α subunit.

We find evidence of cross-talk between G-protein-mediated and hormone-mediated transcriptional regulation.

We find evidence of system specificity in G-protein signaling.

Heterotrimeric G-proteins, composed of α, β, and γ subunits, participate in a wide range of signaling pathways in eukaryotes (Morris and Malbon, 1999). According to the typical, mammalian paradigm, in its inactive state, the G-protein exists as an associated heterotrimer. G-protein signaling begins with ligand binding that results in a conformational change in a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Once activated by the GPCR, the Gα separates from the associated Gβγ dimer and the freed Gα and Gβγ proteins can then interact with downstream effector molecules, alone or in combination, to transduce the signal. Subsequent to signal propagation, Gα re-associates with the Gβγ dimer to reform the G-protein complex.

There are several classical routes for signal propagation through heterotrimeric G-proteins that have been categorized in mammalian systems (Marrari et al, 2007; Dupre et al, 2009). One route, which we designate classical I, requires the presence of both subunits, and can invoke one of two distinct mechanisms. In one mechanism, on GPCR activation, freed Gα and Gβγ each interact with downstream effectors to elicit the downstream response. In a related mechanism, Gα but not Gβγ interacts with downstream effectors, but the Gβγ dimer is nevertheless required to facilitate coupling of Gα with the relevant GPCR (Marrari et al, 2007). In a second route, which we designate classical II, it is solely the Gβγ dimer that interacts with downstream effectors; in this case, sequestration of Gβγ within the heterotrimer prevents signal propagation. In addition, a few non-classical G-protein regulatory modes have also been implicated in some systems, for example signaling by the intact heterotrimer in yeast (Klein et al, 2000; Frank et al, 2005). Observations such as these lead to a fundamental question, namely, which of all the theoretical regulatory modes of G-protein signaling are realized biologically. Our study answers this question in the context of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, and in addition analyzes the manner in which G-protein signaling couples with signaling by the plant hormone abscisic acid. The Arabidopsis genome encodes only one canonical Gα subunit, GPA1, and one canonical Gβ subunit, AGB1, and knockout mutants are available for each of these, allowing clear dissection of Gα- and Gβ-related phenotypes.

Abscisic acid (ABA) is a major plant hormone, which inhibits growth and promotes tolerance of abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, and cold. ABA signaling is known to interact with heterotrimeric G-protein signaling in both developmental and stress responses in a complex manner, causing, for example, ABA hyposensitivity of guard cell stomatal opening in gpa1 and agb1 single mutants as well as agb1 gpa1 double mutants (Fan et al, 2008), but ABA hypersensitivity of the inhibition of seed germination and post-germination seedling development in the same mutants (Pandey et al, 2006). These experimental observations implicate G-proteins as one of the components of ABA signaling, but to date no systematic study has been conducted in either plant or metazoan systems to define the co-regulatory modes of a G-protein and a hormone.

In this study, we conduct genome-wide gene expression profiling in G-protein subunit mutants of A. thaliana guard cells and leaves, with or without treatment with ABA. By introducing one or more mediators acting downstream of the G-protein and ABA to control transcript levels, we propose nine G-protein/ABA signaling pathways including ABA-independent G-protein signaling pathways, G-protein-independent ABA signaling pathways, and seven distinct ABA–G-protein-coupled signaling pathways (Figure 1). We develop a Boolean modeling framework to systematically enumerate 14 possible theoretical regulatory modes of the G-protein and 142 co-regulatory modes of the G-protein and ABA, and then use a pattern matching approach to associate target genes with theoretical regulatory modes.

Our analysis shows that the G-protein regulatory mode that requires the presence of both Gα and Gβγ subunits (consistent with classical I mechanisms), is well represented in both guard cells and leaves. The G-protein regulatory mode that requires a freed Gβγ subunit (classical II G-protein regulatory mechanism) is well supported in guard cells and somewhat less so in leaves. In addition, a G-protein regulatory mode representing a non-classical regulatory mechanism is prevalent in guard cells but less so in leaves (Figure 5). In this regulatory mode, signaling by Gβ(γ) occurs, and this signaling is not regulated in any way by Gα.

By relating the target genes with the nine proposed G-protein/ABA signaling pathways, we are able to gauge the plausibility of regulatory modes of the G-protein and ABA at the pathway level. We find that G-protein-independent ABA signaling pathways are prevalent in both guard cells and leaves. The existence of an ABA-independent regulatory activity of the G-protein is well supported in guard cells, but not supported in leaves. Additive regulation by G-protein signaling plus G-protein-independent ABA signaling is rare in both guard cells and leaves. In addition, combinatorial cross-talk between G-protein signaling and ABA signaling and additive cross-talk between ABA–G-protein signaling and G-protein-independent ABA signaling are observed in both guard cells and leaves. Our transcriptome analysis indicates that in some cases, ABA definitely does not influence G-protein signaling, though it may do so in some other cases.

To investigate whether previously observed hypersensitivity or hyposensitivity of developmental and dynamic transient responses to ABA in G-protein mutants is recapitulated at the level of transcriptional regulation, we compare gene regulation by ABA in guard cells and leaves of the G-protein mutants versus wild type. We find that in guard cells, equal ABA hyposensitivity of all mutants combined is significant, although hyposensitivity in individual mutants is not. There is also a separate group of genes in guard cells that show ABA hypersensitivity in the gpa1 mutant, suggesting complex interactions between ABA and G-protein signaling in gene regulation in this cell type. In leaves, ABA hyposensitivity of gene expression in the three individual mutants and equal hyposensitivity in all mutants are strongly supported. In addition, several of the functional categories identified by our analysis of G-protein regulatory modes have been implicated in previous physiological analyses of G-protein mutants, providing validation to the biological interpretation of our results.

In summary, by conducting a genome-wide gene expression profiling study in G-protein subunit mutants of A. thaliana guard cells and leaves and developing a Boolean modeling framework, we systematically evaluate the biological utilization of mechanisms of G-protein regulatory action and reveal novel regulatory modes of the G-protein. The results generate empirical evidence and insights regarding molecular events of G-protein signaling and response at the physiological level in both plants and mammals.

Heterotrimeric G-proteins mediate crucial and diverse signaling pathways in eukaryotes. Here, we generate and analyze microarray data from guard cells and leaves of G-protein subunit mutants of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, with or without treatment with the stress hormone, abscisic acid. Although G-protein control of the transcriptome has received little attention to date in any system, transcriptome analysis allows us to search for potentially uncommon yet significant signaling mechanisms. We describe the theoretical Boolean mechanisms of G-protein × hormone regulation, and then apply a pattern matching approach to associate gene expression profiles with Boolean models. We find that (1) classical mechanisms of G-protein signaling are well represented. Conversely, some theoretical regulatory modes of the G-protein are not supported; (2) a new mechanism of G-protein signaling is revealed, in which Gβ regulates gene expression identically in the presence or absence of Gα; (3) guard cells and leaves favor different G-protein modes in transcriptome regulation, supporting system specificity of G-protein signaling. Our method holds significant promise for analyzing analogous ‘switch-like' signal transduction events in any organism.

Emerging roles for G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels in health and disease

G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels hyperpolarize neurons in response to activation of many different G protein-coupled receptors and thus control the excitability of neurons through GIRK-mediated self-inhibition, slow synaptic potentials and volume transmission. GIRK channel function and trafficking are highly dependent on the channel subunit composition. Pharmacological investigations of GIRK channels and studies in animal models suggest that GIRK activity has an important role in physiological responses, including pain perception and memory modulation. Moreover, abnormal GIRK function has been implicated in altering neuronal excitability and cell death, which may be important in the pathophysiology of diseases such as epilepsy, Down's syndrome, Parkinson's disease and drug addiction. GIRK channels may therefore prove to be a valuable new therapeutic target.

G alpha(i) and G betagamma jointly regulate the conformations of a G betagamma effector, the neuronal G protein-activated K+ channel (GIRK)

Stable complexes among G proteins and effectors are an emerging concept in cell signaling. The prototypical G betagamma effector G protein-activated K(+) channel (GIRK; Kir3) physically interacts with G betagamma but also with G alpha(i/o). Whether and how G alpha(i/o) subunits regulate GIRK in vivo is unclear. We studied triple interactions among GIRK subunits 1 and 2, G alpha(i3) and G betagamma. We used in vitro protein interaction assays and in vivo intramolecular Förster resonance energy transfer (i-FRET) between fluorophores attached to N and C termini of either GIRK1 or GIRK2 subunit. We demonstrate, for the first time, that G betagamma and G alpha(i3) distinctly and interdependently alter the conformational states of the heterotetrameric GIRK1/2 channel. Biochemical experiments show that G betagamma greatly enhances the binding of GIRK1 subunit to G alpha(i3)(GDP) and, unexpectedly, to G alpha(i3)(GTP). i-FRET showed that both G alpha(i3) and G betagamma induced distinct conformational changes in GIRK1 and GIRK2. Moreover, GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits assumed unique, distinct conformations when coexpressed with a "constitutively active" G alpha(i3) mutant and G betagamma together. These conformations differ from those assumed by GIRK1 or GIRK2 after separate coexpression of either G alpha(i3) or G betagamma. Both biochemical and i-FRET data suggest that GIRK acts as the nucleator of the GIRK-G alpha-G betagamma signaling complex and mediates allosteric interactions between G alpha(i)(GTP) and G betagamma. Our findings imply that G alpha(i/o) and the G alpha(i) betagamma heterotrimer can regulate a G betagamma effector both before and after activation by neurotransmitters.

Elucidation of the gating of the GIRK channel using a spectroscopic approach

The traditional view of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signalling puts the players in this signalling cascade, namely the GPCR, the G protein and its effector, as individual components in space, where the signalling specificity is obtained mainly by the interaction of the GPCR and the Galpha subunits of the G protein. A question is then raised as to how fidelity in receptor signalling is achieved, given that many systems use the same components of the G protein signalling machinery. One possible mechanism for obtaining the specific flow of the downstream signals, from the activated G protein to its specific effector target, in a timely manner, is compartmentalization, a spatial arrangement of the complex in a rather restricted space. Here we review our recent findings related to these issues, using the G protein-coupled potassium channel (GIRK) as a model effector and fluorescence-based approaches to reveal how the signalling complex is arranged and how the G protein exerts its action to activate the GIRK channel in intact cells.

The role of inhibitory heterotrimeric G proteins in the control of in vivo heart rate dynamics

Multiple isoforms of inhibitory Galpha-subunits (Galphai1,2,3, as well as Galphao) are present within the heart, and their role in modulating pacemaker function remains unresolved. Do inhibitory Galpha-subunits selectively modulate parasympathetic heart rate responses? Published findings using a variety of experimental approaches have implicated roles for Galphai2, Galphai3, and Galphao in parasympathetic signal transduction. We have compared in vivo different groups of mice with global genetic deletion of Gialpha1/Galphai3, Galphai2, and Galphao against littermate controls using implanted ECG telemetry. Significant resting tachycardia was observed in Galphai2(-/-) and Galphao(-/-) mice compared with control and Galphai1(-/-)/Galphai3(-/-) mice (P < 0.05). Loss of diurnal heart rate variation was seen exclusively in Galphao(-/-) mice. Using heart rate variability (HRV) analysis, compared with littermate controls (4.02 ms2 +/- 1.17; n = 6, Galphai2(-/-)) mice have a selective attenuation of high-frequency (HF) power (0.73 ms2 +/- 0.31; n = 5, P < 0.05). Galphai1(-/-)/Galphai3(-/-) and Galphao(-/-) cohorts have nonsignificant changes in HF power. Galphao(-/-) mice have a different basal HRV signature. The observed HRV phenotype in Galphai2(-/-) mice was qualitatively similar to atropine (1 mg/kg)-treated controls [and mice treated with the GIRK channel blocker tertiapinQ (0.05 mg/kg)]. Maximal cardioinhibitory response to the M(2)-receptor agonist carbachol (0.5 mg/kg) compared with basal heart rate was attenuated in Galphai2(-/-) mice (0.08 +/- 0.04; n = 6) compared to control (0.27 +/- 0.04; n = 7 P < 0.05). Our data suggest a selective defect of parasympathetic heart rate modulation in mice with Galphai2 deletion. Mice with Galphao deletion also have a defect in short-term heart rate dynamics, but this is qualitatively different to the effects of atropine, tertiapinQ, and Galphai2 deletion. In contrast, Galphai1 and Galphai3 do not appear to be essential for parasympathetic responses in vivo.

Influence of positive allosteric modulators on GABA(B) receptor coupling in rat brain: a scintillation proximity assay characterisation of G protein subtypes

Little is known concerning coupling of cerebral GABA(B) receptors to G protein subtypes, and the influence of positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) has not been evaluated. These questions were addressed by an antibody-capture/scintillation proximity assay strategy. GABA concentration-dependently enhanced the magnitude of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to Galphao and, less markedly, Galphai(1/3) in cortex, whereas Gq and Gs/olf were unaffected. (R)-baclofen and SKF97581 likewise activated Galphao and Galphai(1/3), expressing their actions more potently than GABA. Similar findings were acquired in hippocampus and cerebellum, and the GABA(B) antagonist, CGP55845A, abolished agonist-induced activation of Galphao and Galphai(1/3) in all structures. The PAMs, GS39783, CGP7930 and CGP13501, inactive alone, enhanced efficacy and potency of agonist-induced [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to Galphao in all regions, actions abolished by CGP55845A. In contrast, they did not modify efficacies at Galphai(1/3). Similarly, in human embryonic kidney cells expressing GABA(B(1a+2)) or GABA(B(1b+2)) receptors, allosteric modulators did not detectably enhance efficacy of GABA at Galphai(1/3), though they increased its potency. To summarise, GABA(B) receptors coupled both to Galphao and to Galphai, but not Gq and Gs/olf, in rat brain. PAMs more markedly enhanced efficacy of coupling to Go versus Gi(1/3). It will be of interest to confirm these observations employing complementary techniques and to evaluate their potential therapeutic significance.

Coregulation of natively expressed pertussis toxin-sensitive muscarinic receptors with G-protein-activated potassium channels

Many inhibitory neurotransmitters in the brain activate Kir3 channels by stimulating pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive G-protein-coupled receptors. Here, we investigated the regulation of native muscarinic receptors and Kir3 channels expressed in NGF-differentiated PC12 cells, which are similar to sympathetic neurons. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and immunocytochemistry revealed that NGF treatment significantly upregulated mRNA and protein for m2 muscarinic receptors, PTX-sensitive G alpha(o) G-proteins, and Kir3.2c channels. Surprisingly, these upregulated muscarinic receptor/Kir3 signaling complexes were functionally silent. Ectopic expression of m2 muscarinic receptors or Kir3.2c channels was unable to produce muscarinic receptor-activated Kir3 currents with oxotremorine. Remarkably, pretreatment with muscarinic (m2/m4) receptor antagonists resulted in robust oxotremorine-activated Kir3 currents. Thus, sustained cholinergic stimulation of natively expressed m2/m4 muscarinic receptors controlled cell surface expression and functional coupling of both receptors and Kir3 channels. This new pathway for controlling Kir3 signaling could help limit the potential harmful effects of excessive Kir3 activity in the brain.

Definitive role for natriuretic peptide receptor-C in mediating the vasorelaxant activity of C-type natriuretic peptide and endothelium-derived hyperpolarising factor

OBJECTIVE

C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) has recently been suggested to represent an endothelium-derived hyperpolarising factor (EDHF) in the mammalian resistance vasculature and, as such, important in the regulation of local blood flow and systemic blood pressure. Additionally, this peptide has been shown to protect against ischaemia-reperfusion injury and inhibits leukocyte and platelet activation. Herein, we use a novel, selective natriuretic peptide receptor-C (NPR-C) antagonist (M372049) to highlight the pivotal contribution of CNP/NPR-C signalling in the EDHF-dependent regulation of vascular tone and investigate the mechanism(s) underlying the release and biological activity of CNP.

METHODS

In vitro pharmacological investigation was conducted in rat (Sprague-Dawley) aorta and mesenteric resistance arteries. Relaxant responses to CNP, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), the nitric oxide donor spermine-NONOate (SPER-NO) and the endothelium-dependent vasodilator, acetylcholine (ACh) were examined in the absence and presence of M372049 or inhibitor cocktails shown previously to block endothelium-dependent dilatation in the resistance vasculature. RT-PCR was employed to characterize the expression of NPR subtypes in the vessels studied.

RESULTS

M372049 produced concentration-dependent inhibition of the vasorelaxant activity of CNP in rat isolated mesenteric resistance arteries but not aorta; in contrast, M372049 did not affect relaxations to ANP or SPER-NO in either vessel. M372049 or ouabain alone produced small, significant inhibition of EDHF-dependent relaxations in mesenteric arteries and in combination acted synergistically to abolish such responses. A combination of M372049 with established inhibitors of EDHF-dependent relaxation revealed that multiple, distinct pathways coordinate the bioactivity of EDHF in the resistance vasculature, and that CNP/NPR-C signalling represents a major component.

CONCLUSIONS

These data substantiate CNP/NPR-C signalling as a fundamental pathway underlying EDHF-dependent regulation of vascular tone in the rat mesenteric resistance vasculature. An increased understanding of the physiological roles of CNP/NPR-C signalling in the vasculature (now facilitated by the identification of a selective NPR-C antagonist) should aid determination of the (patho)physiological importance of EDHF and might provide the rationale for the design of novel therapeutics.

Dominant role of GABAB2 and Gbetagamma for GABAB receptor-mediated-ERK1/2/CREB pathway in cerebellar neurons

gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptor is an allosteric complex made of two subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2). GABA(B2) plays a major role in the coupling to G protein whereas GABA(B1) binds GABA. It has been shown that GABA(B) receptor activates ERK(1/2) in neurons of the central nervous system, but the molecular mechanisms underlying this event are poorly characterized. Here, we demonstrate that activation of GABA(B) receptor by either GABA or the selective agonist baclofen induces ERK(1/2) phosphorylation in cultured cerebellar granule neurons. We also show that CGP7930, a positive allosteric regulator specific of GABA(B2), alone can induce the phosphorylation of ERK(1/2). PTX, a G(i/o) inhibitor, abolishes both baclofen and CGP7930-mediated-ERK(1/2) phosphorylation. Moreover, both baclofen and CGP7930 induce ERK-dependent CREB phosphorylation. Furthermore, by using LY294002, a PI-3 kinase inhibitor, and a C-term of GRK-2 that has been reported to sequester Gbetagamma subunits, we demonstrate the role of Gbetagamma in GABA(B) receptor-mediated-ERK(1/2) phosphorylation. In conclusion, the activation of GABA(B) receptor leads to ERK(1/2) phosphorylation via the coupling of GABA(B2) to G(i/o) and by releasing Gbetagamma subunits which in turn induce the activation of CREB. These findings suggest a role of GABA(B) receptor in long-term change in the central nervous system.

GIRK Channel Activation Involves a Local Rearrangement of a Preformed G Protein Channel Complex

G protein-coupled signaling is one of the major mechanisms for controlling cellular excitability. One of the main targets for this control at postsynaptic membranes is the G protein-coupled potassium channels (GIRK/Kir3), which generate slow inhibitory postsynaptic potentials following the activation of Pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein-coupled receptors. Using total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy combined with fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), in intact cells, we provide evidence for the existence of a trimeric G protein-channel complex at rest. We show that activation of the channel via the receptor induces a local conformational switch of the G protein to induce channel opening. The presence of such a complex thus provides the means for a precise temporal and highly selective activation of the channel, which is required for fine tuning of neuronal excitability.

Modulation of basal and receptor-induced GIRK potassium channel activity and neuronal excitability by the mammalian PINS homolog LGN

G protein-activated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels mediate slow synaptic inhibition and control neuronal excitability. It is unknown whether GIRK channels are subject to regulation by guanine dissociation inhibitor (GDI) proteins like LGN, a mammalian homolog of Drosophila Partner of Inscuteable (mPINS). Here we report that LGN increases basal GIRK current but reduces GIRK activation by metabotropic transmitter receptors coupled to Gi or Go, but not Gs. Moreover, expression of its N-terminal, TPR-containing protein interaction domains mimics the effects of LGN in mammalian cells, probably by releasing sequestered endogenous LGN. In hippocampal neurons, expression of LGN, or LGN fragments that mimic or enhance LGN activity, hyperpolarizes the resting potential due to increased basal GIRK activity and reduces excitability. Using Lenti virus for LGN RNAi to reduce endogenous LGN levels in hippocampal neurons, we further show an essential role of LGN for maintaining basal GIRK channel activity and for harnessing neuronal excitability.

The selective interactions and functions of regulators of G-protein signalling

There is accumulating evidence that regulators of G-protein signalling (RGS) can have roles in signal transduction that are not related to GAP activity. Furthermore, RGSs have much more selective effects in vivo than might be anticipated from their behaviour in in vitro assays. I discuss the molecular mechanisms by which these phenomena might be explained including specific interactions between the RGS and G-protein coupled receptor, G-protein and effector.

Molecular diversity, trafficking and subcellular localization of GABAB receptors

GABAB receptors are the G-protein coupled receptors for the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). While native studies predicted pharmacologically distinct GABAB receptor subtypes, molecular studies failed to identify the expected receptor varieties. Mouse genetic experiments therefore addressed whether the cloned receptors can account for the classical electrophysiological, biochemical and behavioral GABAB responses or whether additional receptors exist. Among G-protein coupled receptors, GABAB receptors are unique in that they require 2 distinct subunits for functioning. This atypical receptor structure triggered a large body of work that investigated the regulation of receptor assembly and trafficking. With the availability of molecular tools, substantial progress was also made in the analysis of the receptor protein distribution in neuronal compartments. Here, we review recent studies that shed light on the molecular diversity, the subcellular distribution and the cell surface dynamics of GABAB receptors.

Heterotrimeric G proteins precouple with G protein-coupled receptors in living cells

Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy, we investigate how heterotrimeric G proteins interact with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In the absence of receptor activation, the alpha2A adrenergic and muscarinic M4 receptors are present on the cell membrane as dimers. Furthermore, there is an interaction between the G protein subunits alpha o, beta1, and gamma2 and a number of GPCRs including M4, alpha2A, the adenosine A1 receptor, and the dopamine D2 receptor under resting conditions. The interaction between GPCRs and Galpha proteins shows specificity: there is interaction between the alpha2A receptor and Go, but little interaction between the alpha2A receptor and Gs. In contrast, the predominantly Gs-coupled prostacyclin receptor interacted with Gs, but there was little interaction between the prostacyclin receptor and Go. Inverse agonists did not change the FRET ratio, whereas the addition of agonist resulted in a modest fall. Our work suggests that GPCR dimers and the G protein heterotrimer are present at the cell membrane in the resting state in a pentameric complex.

PKC-delta sensitizes Kir3.1/3.2 channels to changes in membrane phospholipid levels after M3 receptor activation in HEK-293 cells

G protein-gated inward rectifier (Kir3) channels are inhibited by activation of G(q/11)-coupled receptors and this has been postulated to involve the signaling molecules protein kinase C (PKC) and/or phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP(2)). Their precise roles in mediating the inhibition of this family of channels remain controversial. We examine here their relative roles in causing inhibition of Kir3.1/3.2 channels stably expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells after muscarinic M(3) receptor activation. In perforated patch mode, staurosporine prevented the G(q/11)-mediated, M(3) receptor, inhibition of channel activity. Recovery from M(3)-mediated inhibition was wortmannin sensitive. Whole cell currents, where the patch pipette was supplemented with PIP(2), were still irreversibly inhibited by M(3) receptor stimulation. When adenosine A(1) receptors were co-expressed, inclusion of PIP(2) rescued the A(1)-mediated response. Recordings from inside-out patches showed that catalytically active PKC applied directly to the intracellular membrane face inhibited the channels: a reversible effect modulated by okadaic acid. Generation of mutant heteromeric channel Kir3.1S185A/Kir3.2C-S178A, still left the channel susceptible to receptor, pharmacological, and direct kinase-mediated inhibition. Biochemically, labeled phosphate is incorporated into the channel. We suggest that PKC-delta mediates channel inhibition because recombinant PKC-delta inhibited channel activity, M(3)-mediated inhibition of the channel, was counteracted by overexpression of two types of dominant negative PKC-delta constructs, and, by using confocal microscopy, we have demonstrated translocation of green fluorescent protein-tagged PKC-delta to the plasma membrane on M(3) receptor stimulation. Thus Kir3.1/3.2 channels are sensitive to changes in membrane phospholipid levels but this is contingent on the activity of PKC-delta after M(3) receptor activation in HEK-293 cells.

GoLoco motif peptides as probes of Galpha subunit specificity in coupling of G-protein-coupled receptors to ion channels

Biochemical and structural studies of signaling proteins have revealed critical features of peptide motifs at the interaction surfaces between proteins. Such information can be used to design small peptides that can be used as functional probes of specific interactions in signaling cascades. This article describes the use of a novel domain (the GoLoco motif) found in several members of the regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) protein family to probe the specificity of Galpha subunit involvement in the coupling of dopamine and somatostatin receptors to ion channels in the AtT20 neuroendocrine cell line. Peptides encoding the GoLoco motifs of RGS12 and AGS3 were perfused into single cells during electrical recording of agonist-induced current responses by whole cell patch clamp methods. The particular sequences chosen have been demonstrated to bind selectively to the GDP-bound form of Galphai, but not Galphao, and preclude association of Gbetagamma and Galphai subunits. A functional manifestation of this property is observed in the progressive uncoupling of D2 dopamine receptors and Kir3.1/3.2 channels with repeated agonist application. Similar uncoupling is not observed with somatostatin receptors nor with D2 receptors coupling to calcium channels, suggesting Galpha subunit specificity in these signaling pathways. Motifs found in other proteins in the GPCR signaling machinery may also prove useful in assessing G-protein signaling specificity and complexity in single cells in the future.

Regulators of G-protein signaling form a quaternary complex with the agonist, receptor, and G-protein. A novel explanation for the acceleration of signaling activation kinetics

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins modulate signaling through heterotrimeric G-proteins. They act to enhance the intrinsic GTPase activity of the Galpha subunit but paradoxically have also been shown to enhance receptor-stimulated activation. To study this paradox, we used a G-protein gated K+ channel to report the dynamics of the G-protein cycle and fluorescence resonance energy transfer techniques with cyan and yellow fluorescent protein-tagged proteins to report physical interaction. Our data show that the acceleration of the activation kinetics is dissociated from deactivation kinetics and dependent on receptor and RGS type, G-protein isoform, and RGS expression levels. By using fluorescently tagged proteins, fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy showed a stable physical interaction between the G-protein alpha subunit and RGS (RGS8 and RGS7) that is independent of the functional state of the G-protein. RGS8 does not directly interact with G-protein-coupled receptors. Our data show participation of the RGS in the ternary complex between agonist-receptor and G-protein to form a "quaternary complex." Thus we propose a novel model for the action of RGS proteins in the G-protein cycle in which the RGS protein appears to enhance the "kinetic efficacy" of the ternary complex, by direct association with the G-protein alpha subunit.

Endogenous RGS proteins enhance acute desensitization of GABA(B) receptor-activated GIRK currents in HEK-293T cells

The coupling of GABA(B) receptors to G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels constitutes an important inhibitory pathway in the brain. Here, we examined the mechanism underlying desensitization of agonist-evoked currents carried by homomeric GIRK2 channels expressed in HEK-293T cells. The canonical GABA(B) receptor agonist baclofen produced GIRK2 currents that decayed by 57.3+/-1.4% after 60 s of stimulation, and then deactivated rapidly (time constant of 3.90+/-0.21 s) upon removal of agonist. Surface labeling studies revealed that GABA(B) receptors, in contrast to micro opioid receptors (MOR), did not internalize with a sustained stimulation for 10 min, excluding receptor redistribution as the primary mechanism for desensitization. Furthermore, heterologous desensitization was observed between GABA(B) receptors and MOR, implicating downstream proteins, such G-proteins or the GIRK channel. To investigate the G-protein turnover cycle, the non-hydrolyzable GTP analogue (GTPgammaS) was included in the intracellular solution and found to attenuate desensitization to 38.3+/-2.0%. The extent of desensitization was also reduced (45.3+/-1.3%) by coexpressing a mutant form of the Galphaq G-protein subunit that has been designed to sequester endogenous RGS proteins. Finally, reconstitution of GABA(B) receptors with Galphao G-proteins rendered insensitive to RGS resulted in significantly less desensitization (28.5+/-3.2%). Taken together, our results demonstrate that endogenous levels of RGS proteins effectively enhance GABA(B) receptor-dependent desensitization of GIRK currents.

Measuring the modulatory effects of RGS proteins on GIRK channels

Discovery of "regulators of G-protein signaling" (RGS) as GTPase-activating proteins for heterotrimeric G proteins has provided a highly sought "missing link," reconciling past discrepancies between the in vitro GTPase activity of purified G proteins and the kinetics of physiological responses mediated by G-protein signaling in vivo. With the number of RGS genes in the mammalian genome at more than 30, associating specific RGS proteins to specific G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling events has become a focus of RGS investigators. The ubiquitous expression of multiple RGS proteins has complicated this effort, yet the outlook has been encouraged with the identification of RGS9 as the determinant mediating rapid recovery of the transducin-dependent photoresponse. G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels that mediate inhibitory synaptic transmission via GPCR activation of pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins are similarly accelerated by RGS proteins when reconstituted in heterologous cell expression systems and fully reproduce the gating properties of native GIRK channels in neurons and cardiomyocytes. The endogenous neuronal and cardiac RGS protein(s) that accelerate GPCR-->GIRK channel-gating kinetics are currently not known. This article describes methods used to measure the receptor-dependent GIRK channel-gating parameters reconstituted in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells and Xenopus oocytes, as well as rat atrial myocytes and rat cerebellar granule neurons as model cells with native GPCR-->GIRK channel signaling. Applications of these methods for structure-function-based studies of RGS proteins, G proteins, and GPCRs are discussed. We also describe single cell reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction methods developed to profile atrial myocyte and neuronal RGS expression to identify specific RGS proteins for targeted knockdown or knockout.

Dopamine Receptor Signaling

The D1-like (D1, D5) and D2-like (D2, D3, D4) classes of dopamine receptors each has shared signaling properties that contribute to the definition of the receptor class, although some differences among subtypes within a class have been identified. D1-like receptor signaling is mediated chiefly by the heterotrimeric G proteins Galphas and Galphaolf, which cause sequential activation of adenylate cyclase, cylic AMP-dependent protein kinase, and the protein phosphatase-1 inhibitor DARPP-32. The increased phosphorylation that results from the combined effects of activating cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase and inhibiting protein phosphatase 1 regulates the activity of many receptors, enzymes, ion channels, and transcription factors. D1 or a novel D1-like receptor also signals via phospholipase C-dependent and cyclic AMP-independent mobilization of intracellular calcium. D2-like receptor signaling is mediated by the heterotrimeric G proteins Galphai and Galphao. These pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins regulate some effectors, such as adenylate cyclase, via their Galpha subunits, but regulate many more effectors such as ion channels, phospholipases, protein kinases, and receptor tyrosine kinases as a result of the receptor-induced liberation of Gbetagamma subunits. In addition to interactions between dopamine receptors and G proteins, other protein:protein interactions such as receptor oligomerization or receptor interactions with scaffolding and signal-switching proteins are critical for regulation of dopamine receptor signaling.

Molecular structure and physiological functions of GABA(B) receptors

GABA(B) receptors are broadly expressed in the nervous system and have been implicated in a wide variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders. The cloning of the first GABA(B) receptor cDNAs in 1997 revived interest in these receptors and their potential as therapeutic targets. With the availability of molecular tools, rapid progress was made in our understanding of the GABA(B) system. This led to the surprising discovery that GABA(B) receptors need to assemble from distinct subunits to function and provided exciting new insights into the structure of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in general. As a consequence of this discovery, it is now widely accepted that GPCRs can exist as heterodimers. The cloning of GABA(B) receptors allowed some important questions in the field to be answered. It is now clear that molecular studies do not support the existence of pharmacologically distinct GABA(B) receptors, as predicted by work on native receptors. Advances were also made in clarifying the relationship between GABA(B) receptors and the receptors for gamma-hydroxybutyrate, an emerging drug of abuse. There are now the first indications linking GABA(B) receptor polymorphisms to epilepsy. Significantly, the cloning of GABA(B) receptors enabled identification of the first allosteric GABA(B) receptor compounds, which is expected to broaden the spectrum of therapeutic applications. Here we review current concepts on the molecular composition and function of GABA(B) receptors and discuss ongoing drug-discovery efforts.

A retinal-specific regulator of G-protein signaling interacts with Galpha(o) and accelerates an expressed metabotropic glutamate receptor 6 cascade

G(o) is the most abundant G-protein in the brain, but its regulators are essentially unknown. In retina, Galpha(o1) is obligatory in mediating the metabotropic glutamate receptor 6 (mGluR6)-initiated ON response. To identify the interactors of G(o), we conducted a yeast two-hybrid screen with constituitively active Galpha(o) as a bait. The screen frequently identified a regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS), Ret-RGS1, the interaction of which we confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation with Galpha(o) in transfected cells and in retina. Ret-RGS1 localized to the dendritic tips of ON bipolar neurons, along with mGluR6 and Galpha(o1). When Ret-RGS1 was coexpressed in Xenopus oocytes with mGluR6, Galpha(o1), and a GIRK (G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+) channel, it accelerated the deactivation of the channel response to glutamate in a concentration-dependent manner. Because light onset suppresses glutamate release from photoreceptors onto the ON bipolar dendrites, Ret-RGS1 should accelerate the rising phase of the light response of the ON bipolar cell. This would tend to match its kinetics to that of the OFF bipolar that arises directly from ligand-gated channels.

The extracellular cyclic AMP-adenosine pathway in renal physiology

Many cell types in the kidney express adenosine receptors, and adenosine has multiple effects on renal function. Although adenosine is produced within the kidney by several biochemical reactions, recent studies support a novel mechanism for renal adenosine production, the extracellular cAMP-adenosine pathway. This extracellular cAMP-adenosine pathway is initiated by efflux of cAMP from cells following activation of adenylyl cyclase. Extracellular cAMP is then converted to adenosine by the serial actions of ecto-phosphodiesterase and ecto-5'-nucleotidase. When extracellular cAMP is converted to adenosine near the biophase of cAMP production and efflux, this local extracellular cAMP-adenosine pathway permits tight coupling of the site of adenosine production to the site of adenosine receptors. cAMP in renal compartments may also be formed by tissues/organs remote from the kidney. For example, stimulation of hepatic adenylyl cyclase by the pancreatic hormone glucagon increases circulating cAMP, which is filtered at the glomerulus and concentrated in the tubular lumen as water is extracted from the ultrafiltrate. Conversion of hepatic-derived cAMP to adenosine in the kidney completes a pancreatohepatorenal cAMP-adenosine pathway that may serve as an endocrine link between the pancreas, liver, and kidney.

Gαi1 and Gαi3 Differentially Interact with, and Regulate, the G Protein-activated K+ Channel

G protein-activated K(+) channels (GIRKs; Kir3) are activated by direct binding of Gbetagamma subunits released from heterotrimeric G proteins. In native tissues, only pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins of the G(i/o) family, preferably Galpha(i3) and Galpha(i2), are donors of Gbetagamma for GIRK. How this specificity is achieved is not known. Here, using a pull-down method, we confirmed the presence of Galpha(i3-GDP) binding site in the N terminus of GIRK1 and identified novel binding sites in the N terminus of GIRK2 and in the C termini of GIRK1 and GIRK2. The non-hydrolyzable GTP analog, guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate, reduced the binding of Galpha(i3) by a factor of 2-4. Galpha(i1-GDP) bound to GIRK1 and GIRK2 much weaker than Galpha(i3-GDP). Titrated expression of components of signaling pathway in Xenopus oocytes and their activation by m2 muscarinic receptors revealed that G(i3) activates GIRK more efficiently than G(i1), as indicated by larger and faster agonist-evoked currents. Activation of GIRK by purified Gbetagamma in excised membrane patches was strongly augmented by coexpression of Galpha(i3) and less by Galpha(i1). Differences in physical interactions of GIRK with GDP-bound Galpha subunits, or Galphabetagamma heterotrimers, may dictate different extents of Galphabetagamma anchoring, influence the efficiency of GIRK activation by Gbetagamma, and play a role in determining signaling specificity.

Rapid desensitization of G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) currents is determined by G protein cycle

Activation of G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels, found in the brain, heart, and endocrine tissue, leads to membrane hyperpolarization that generates neuronal inhibitory postsynaptic potentials, slows the heart rate, and inhibits hormone release. During stimulation of G(i/o)-coupled receptors and subsequent channel activation, it has been observed that the current desensitizes. In this study we examined mechanisms underlying fast desensitization of cloned heteromeric neuronal Kir3.1+3.2A and atrial Kir3.1+3.4 channels and also homomeric Kir3.0 currents in response to stimulation of several G(i/o) G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) expressed in HEK-293 cells (adenosine A(1), adrenergic alpha(2A), dopamine D(2S), M(4) muscarinic, and GABA(B1b/2) receptors). We found that all agonist-induced currents displayed a similar degree of desensitization except the adenosine A(1) receptor, which exhibits an additional desensitizing component. Using the nonhydrolyzable GTP analog guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS), we found that this is due to a receptor-dependent, G protein-independent process. Using Ca(2+) imaging we showed that desensitization is unlikely to be accounted for solely by phospholipase C activation and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP(2)) hydrolysis. We examined the contribution of the G protein cycle and found the following. First, agonist concentration is strongly correlated with degree of desensitization. Second, competitive inhibition of GDP/GTP exchange by using nonhydrolyzable guanosine 5'-O-(2-thiodiphosphate) (GDPbetaS) has two effects, a slowing of channel activation and an attenuation of the fast desensitization phenomenon. Finally, using specific Galpha subunits we showed that ternary complexes with fast activation rates display more prominent desensitization than those with slower activation kinetics. Together our data suggest that fast desensitization of GIRK currents is accounted for by the fundamental properties of the G protein cycle.

Contribution of Kir3.1, Kir3.2A and Kir3.2C subunits to native G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium currents in cultured hippocampal neurons

G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels are found in neurons, atrial myocytes and neuroendocrine cells. A characteristic feature is their activation by stimulation of Gi/o-coupled receptors. In central neurons, for example, they are activated by adenosine and GABA and, as such, they play an important role in neurotransmitter-mediated regulation of membrane excitability. The channels are tetrameric assemblies of Kir3.x subunits (Kir3.1-3.4 plus splice variants). In this study I have attempted to identify the channel subunits which contribute to the native GIRK current recorded from primary cultured rat hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction revealed the expression of mRNA for Kir3.1, 3.2A, 3.2C and 3.3 subunits and confocal immunofluorescence microscopy was used to investigate their expression patterns. Diffuse staining was observed on both cell somata and dendrites for Kir3.1 and Kir3.2A yet that for Kir3.2C was weaker and punctate. Whole-cell patch clamp recordings were used to record GIRK currents from hippocampal pyramidal neurons which were identified on the basis of inward rectification, dependence of reversal potential on external potassium concentration and sensitivity to tertiapin. The GIRK currents were enhanced by the stimulation of a number of Gi/o-coupled receptors and were inhibited by pertussis toxin. In order to ascertain which Kir3.x subunits were responsible for the native GIRK current I compared the properties with those of the cloned Kir3.1 + 3.2A and Kir3.1 + 3.2C channels heterologously expressed in HEK293 cells.

GABA mediates autoreceptor feedback inhibition in the rat carotid body via presynaptic GABAB receptors and TASK-1

Background K+ channels exert control over neuronal excitability by regulating resting potential and input resistance. Here, we show that GABAB receptor-mediated activation of a background K+ conductance modulates transmission at rat carotid body chemosensory synapses in vitro. Carotid body chemoreceptor (type I) cells expressed GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) subunits as well as endogenous GABA. The GABAB receptor agonist baclofen activated an anandamide- and Ba2+-sensitive TASK-1-like background K+ conductance in chemoreceptor cell clusters, but was without effect on voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Hydroxysaclofen (50 microM), 5-aminovaleric acid (100 microM) and CGP 55845 (100 nM), selective GABAB receptor blockers, potentiated the hypoxia-induced receptor potential; this effect was abolished by pre-treatment with pertussis toxin (PTX; 500 ng ml-1), an inhibitor of Gi, or by H-89 (50 microM), a selective inhibitor of protein kinase A. The protein kinase C inhibitor chelerythrine chloride (100 microM) was without effect on this potentiation. GABAB receptor blockers also caused depolarisation of type I cells in clusters, and enhanced spike discharge in spontaneously firing cells. In functional co-cultures of type I clusters and petrosal sensory neurones, GABAB receptor blockers potentiated hypoxia-induced postsynaptic chemosensory responses mediated by the fast-acting transmitters ACh and ATP. Thus GABAB receptor-mediated activation of TASK-1 or a related channel provides a presynaptic autoregulatory feedback mechanism that modulates fast synaptic transmission in the rat carotid body.

Gabapentin actions on Kir3 currents and N-type Ca2+ channels via GABAB receptors in hippocampal pyramidal cells

Gabapentin is a clinically effective anticonvulsant with an unclear mechanism of action. It was described as a GABA(B(1a,2)) receptor subtype-selective agonist, activating postsynaptic K(+) currents and inhibiting postsynaptic Ca(2+) channels in CA1 pyramidal cells, but without presynaptic actions. These activities appeared controversial and we therefore sought to further clarify gabapentin actions in rat hippocampal slices by characterizing K(+) currents and Ca(2+) channels targeted by gabapentin using whole-cell recording and multiphoton Ca(2+) imaging. 1) We found that gabapentin and baclofen induced inwardly rectifying K(+) currents (K(Gbp) and K(Bac), respectively), sensitive to Ba(2+) and Cs(+). 2) A constitutively active K(IR) current, independent of GABA(B) receptor activation and sensitive to Ba(2+) and Cs(+) was also present. 3) K(Gbp), K(Bac), and K(IR) currents showed some differences in sensitivity to Ba(2+) and Cs(+), indicating the possible activation of distinct Kir3 currents, independent of K(IR), by gabapentin and baclofen. 4) Gabapentin inhibition of Ca(2+) channels was abolished by omega-conotoxin GVIA, but not by omega-agatoxin IVA and nimodipine, indicating a predominant action of gabapentin on N-type Ca(2+) channels. 5) Gabapentin actions were linked to activation of pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins since N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) blocked K(Gbp) activation and Ca(2+) channel inhibition by gabapentin. 6) Finally, gabapentin reduced epileptiform discharges in slices via GABA(B) receptor activation. The anticonvulsant actions of gabapentin in hippocampal cells may thus involve GABA(B) receptor coupling to G-proteins and modulation of Kir3 and N-type Ca(2+) channels. Moreover, gabapentin and baclofen activation of GABA(B) receptors may couple to distinct cellular targets.

Coupling to Gs and G(q/11) of histamine H2 receptors heterologously expressed in adult rat atrial myocytes

The predominant histamine receptor subtype in the supraventricular and ventricular tissue of various mammalian species is the H2 receptor (H2-R) subtype, which is known to couple to stimulatory G proteins (Gs), i.e. the major effects of this autacoid are an increase in sinus rate and in force of contraction. To investigate histamine effects in H2-R-transfected rat atrial myocytes, endogenous GIRK currents and L-type Ca2+ currents were used as functional assays. In H2-R-transfected myocytes, exposure to His resulted in a reversible augmentation of L-type Ca2+ currents, consistent with the established coupling of this receptor to the Gs-cAMP-PKA signalling pathway. Mammalian K+ channels composed of GIRK (Kir3.x) subunits are directly controlled by interaction with betagamma subunits released from G proteins, which couple to seven-helix receptors. In mock-transfected atrial cardiomyocytes, activation of muscarinic K+ channels (IK(ACh)) was limited to Gi-coupled receptors (M2R, A1R). In H2-R-overexpressing cells, histamine activated IK(ACh) via Gs-derived betagamma subunits since the histamine-induced current was insensitive to pertussis toxin. These data indicate that overexpression of Gs-coupled H2-R results in a loss of target specificity due to an increased agonist-induced release of Gs-derived betagamma subunits. When IK(ACh) was maximally activated by GTP-gamma-S, histamine induced an irreversible inhibition of the inward current in a fraction of H2-R-transfected cells. This inhibition is supposed to be mediated via a G(q/11)-PLC-mediated depletion of PIP2, suggesting a partial coupling of overexpressed H2-R to G(q/11). Dual coupling of H2-Rs to Gs and Gq is demonstrated for the first time in cardiac myocytes. It represents a novel mechanism to augment positive inotropic effects by activating two different signalling pathways via one type of histamine receptor. Activation of the Gs-cAMP-PKA pathway promotes Ca2+ influx through phosphorylation of L-type Ca2+ channels. Simultaneous activation of Gq-signalling pathways might result in phosphoinositide turnover and Ca2+ release from intracellular stores, thereby augmenting H2-induced increases in [Ca2+]i.

Convergent control of synaptic GABA release from rat dorsal horn neurones by adenosine and GABA autoreceptors

Perforated patch clamp recordings were performed on cultured superficial neonatal rat dorsal horn (DH) spinal cord neurones in order to study the presynaptic modulation of GABA release at unitary synaptic connections. Since ATP can be coreleased with GABA at about two-thirds of GABAergic synapses between DH neurones, and can be rapidly metabolized to adenosine in the extracellular space, we investigated the potential role of A1 adenosine receptors and GABAB receptors which might function as inhibitory autoreceptors. Adenosine and GABAB receptor agonists reduced the amplitude of electrically evoked GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (eIPSCs) as well as the frequency of GABAergic miniature IPSCs, suggesting a presynaptic action of these substances. The actions of adenosine were blocked by the A1 receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX). The effects of adenosine and GABAB agonists were occlusive, indicating a functional convergence of the signalling pathways engaged by A1 and GABAB receptors. A1 and GABAB antagonists increased the amplitude of eIPSCs in a supra-additive manner, suggesting a tonic activation of these receptors by ambient adenosine and GABA. Moreover, using trains of electrical stimulations, we were able to unravel a phasic (activity-dependent) activation of presynaptic A1 and GABAB autoreceptors only in the case of neurones coreleasing ATP and GABA, despite the presence of functional presynaptic A1 and GABAB receptors on all GABAergic DH neurones. This selective, convergent and activity-dependent inhibition of GABA release by A1 and GABAB autoreceptors might modulate the integrative properties of postsynaptic DH neurones under physiological conditions and/or during the development of pathological pain states.

Agonist unbinding from receptor dictates the nature of deactivation kinetics of G protein-gated K+ channels

G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) (Kir) channels are found in neurones, atrial myocytes, and endocrine cells and are involved in generating late inhibitory postsynaptic potentials, slowing the heart rate and inhibiting hormone release. They are activated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) via the inhibitory family of G protein, G(i/o), in a membrane-delimited fashion by the direct binding of Gbetagamma dimers to the channel complex. In this study we are concerned with the kinetics of deactivation of the cloned neuronal G protein-gated K(+) channel, Kir3.1 + 3.2A, after stimulation of a number of GPCRs. Termination of the channel activity on agonist removal is thought to solely depend on the intrinsic hydrolysis rate of the G protein alpha subunit. In this study we present data that illustrate a more complex behavior. We hypothesize that there are two processes that account for channel deactivation: agonist unbinding from the GPCR and GTP hydrolysis by the G protein alpha subunit. With some combinations of agonist/GPCR, the rate of agonist unbinding is slow and rate-limiting, and deactivation kinetics are not modulated by regulators of G protein-signaling proteins. In another group, channel deactivation is generally faster and limited by the hydrolysis rate of the G protein alpha subunit. G protein isoform and interaction with G protein-signaling proteins play a significant role with this group of GPCRs.

Modulatory role of adenosine receptors in insect motor nerve terminals

The effects of adenosine and ATP were studied on blowfly larvae Calliphora vicina neuromuscular preparation. Adenosine diminished (IC50 = 40 +/- 3 microM) the amplitude of nerve-evoked postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) and slightly decreased the frequency of spontaneous currents without affecting their amplitude. EPSCs were slightly reduced by ATP, and this effect was prevented by concanavalin A. Presynaptic inhibition by adenosine was temperature-dependent and insensitive to pertussis toxin. A1 agonists of vertebrate adenosine receptor CPA and NECA failed to reproduce the effect of adenosine, and 2-CADO enhanced the EPSCs. A1 antagonist DPCPX competitively inhibited adenosine action. A2 agonist DPMA potentiated EPSCs, and its effect was abolished by A2 antagonist DMPX. Adenosine and ATP failed to affect the nonquantal release of glutamate. The results show for the first time the presence of presynaptic adenosine receptors regulating transmitter release at insect motor nerve terminals and point to differences in pharmacological properties of adenosine receptor subtypes in insects and vertebrates.