Interdomain dynamics and coactivation of the mRNA decapping enzyme Dcp2 are mediated by a gatekeeper tryptophan

Eukaryotic mRNA decapping factors: molecular mechanisms and activity

Decapping is the enzymatic removal of 5' cap structures from mRNAs in eukaryotic cells. Cap structures normally enhance mRNA translation and stability, and their excision commits an mRNA to complete 5'-3' exoribonucleolytic digestion and generally ends the physical and functional cellular presence of the mRNA. Decapping plays a pivotal role in eukaryotic cytoplasmic mRNA turnover and is a critical and highly regulated event in multiple 5'-3' mRNA decay pathways, including general 5'-3' decay, nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), AU-rich element-mediated mRNA decay, microRNA-mediated gene silencing, and targeted transcript-specific mRNA decay. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mRNA decapping is carried out by a single Dcp1-Dcp2 decapping enzyme in concert with the accessory activities of specific regulators commonly known as decapping activators or enhancers. These regulatory proteins include the general decapping activators Edc1, 2, and 3, Dhh1, Scd6, Pat1, and the Lsm1-7 complex, as well as the NMD-specific factors, Upf1, 2, and 3. Here, we focus on in vivo mRNA decapping regulation in yeast. We summarize recently uncovered molecular mechanisms that control selective targeting of the yeast decapping enzyme and discuss new roles for specific decapping activators in controlling decapping enzyme targeting, assembly of target-specific decapping complexes, and the monitoring of mRNA translation. Further, we discuss the kinetic contribution of mRNA decapping for overall decay of different substrate mRNAs and highlight experimental evidence pointing to the functional coordination and physical coupling between events in mRNA deadenylation, decapping, and 5'-3' exoribonucleolytic decay.

Insights into the Structure of Invisible Conformations of Large Methyl Group Labeled Molecular Machines from High Pressure NMR

Most proteins are highly flexible and can adopt conformations that deviate from the energetically most favorable ground state. Structural information on these lowly populated, alternative conformations is often lacking, despite the functional importance of these states. Here, we study the pathway by which the Dcp1:Dcp2 mRNA decapping complex exchanges between an autoinhibited closed and an open conformation. We make use of methyl Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) NMR relaxation dispersion (RD) experiments that report on the population of the sparsely populated open conformation as well as on the exchange rate between the two conformations. To obtain volumetric information on the open conformation as well as on the transition state structure we made use of RD measurements at elevated pressures. We found that the open Dcp1:Dcp2 conformation has a lower molecular volume than the closed conformation and that the transition state is close in volume to the closed state. In the presence of ATP the volume change upon opening of the complex increases and the volume of the transition state lies in-between the volumes of the closed and open state. These findings show that ATP has an effect on the volume changes that are associated with the opening-closing pathway of the complex. Our results highlight the strength of pressure dependent NMR methods to obtain insights into structural features of protein conformations that are not directly observable. As our work makes use of methyl groups as NMR probes we conclude that the applied methodology is also applicable to high molecular weight complexes.

Assessing the applicability of 19F labeled tryptophan residues to quantify protein dynamics

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is uniquely suited to study the dynamics of biomolecules in solution. Most NMR studies exploit the spins of proton, carbon and nitrogen isotopes, as these atoms are highly abundant in proteins and nucleic acids. As an alternative and complementary approach, fluorine atoms can be introduced into biomolecules at specific sites of interest. These labels can then be used as sensitive probes for biomolecular structure, dynamics or interactions. Here, we address if the replacement of tryptophan with 5-fluorotryptophan residues has an effect on the overall dynamics of proteins and if the introduced fluorine probe is able to accurately report on global exchange processes. For the four different model proteins (KIX, Dcp1, Dcp2 and DcpS) that we examined, we established that ¹⁵N CPMG relaxation dispersion or EXSY profiles are not affected by the 5-fluorotryptophan, indicating that this replacement of a proton with a fluorine has no effect on the protein motions. However, we found that the motions that the 5-fluorotryptophan reports on can be significantly faster than the backbone motions. This implies that care needs to be taken when interpreting fluorine relaxation data in terms of global protein motions. In summary, our results underscore the great potential of fluorine NMR methods, but also highlight potential pitfalls that need to be considered.

Decapping factor Dcp2 controls mRNA abundance and translation to adjust metabolism and filamentation to nutrient availability

Degradation of most yeast mRNAs involves decapping by Dcp1/Dcp2. DEAD-box protein Dhh1 has been implicated as an activator of decapping, in coupling codon non-optimality to enhanced degradation, and as a translational repressor, but its functions in cells are incompletely understood. RNA-Seq analyses coupled with CAGE sequencing of all capped mRNAs revealed increased abundance of hundreds of mRNAs in dcp2 Δ cells that appears to result directly from impaired decapping rather than elevated transcription, which was confirmed by ChIP-Seq analysis of RNA Polymerase II occupancies genome-wide. Interestingly, only a subset of mRNAs requires Dhh1 for targeting by Dcp2, and also generally requires the other decapping activators Pat1, Lsm2, Edc3 or Scd6; whereas most of the remaining transcripts utilize NMD factors for Dcp2-mediated turnover. Neither inefficient translation initiation nor stalled elongation appears to be a major driver of Dhh1-enhanced mRNA degradation. Surprisingly, ribosome profiling revealed that dcp2 Δ confers widespread changes in relative TEs that generally favor well-translated mRNAs. Because ribosome biogenesis is reduced while capped mRNA abundance is increased by dcp2 Δ, we propose that an increased ratio of mRNA to ribosomes increases competition among mRNAs for limiting ribosomes to favor efficiently translated mRNAs in dcp2 Δ cells. Interestingly, genes involved in respiration or utilization of alternative carbon or nitrogen sources are derepressed, and both mitochondrial function and cell filamentation (a strategy for nutrient foraging) are elevated by dcp2 Δ, suggesting that mRNA decapping sculpts gene expression post-transcriptionally to fine-tune metabolic pathways and morphological transitions according to nutrient availability.

RNase H-based analysis of synthetic mRNA 5' cap incorporation

Advances in mRNA synthesis and lipid nanoparticles technologies have helped make mRNA therapeutics and vaccines a reality. The 5' cap structure is a crucial modification required to functionalize synthetic mRNA for efficient protein translation in vivo and evasion of cellular innate immune responses. The extent of 5' cap incorporation is one of the critical quality attributes in mRNA manufacturing. RNA cap analysis involves multiple steps: generation of predefined short fragments from the 5' end of the kilobase-long synthetic mRNA molecules using RNase H, a ribozyme or a DNAzyme, enrichment of the 5' cleavage products, and LC-MS intact mass analysis. In this paper, we describe (1) a framework to design site-specific RNA cleavage using RNase H; (2) a method to fluorescently label the RNase H cleavage fragments for more accessible readout methods such as gel electrophoresis or high-throughput capillary electrophoresis; (3) a simplified method for post-RNase H purification using desthiobiotinylated oligonucleotides and streptavidin magnetic beads followed by elution using water. By providing a design framework for RNase H-based RNA 5' cap analysis using less resource-intensive analytical methods, we hope to make RNA cap analysis more accessible to the scientific community.

Dcp2 C-terminal cis-binding elements control selective targeting of the decapping enzyme by forming distinct decapping complexes

A single Dcp1-Dcp2 decapping enzyme targets diverse classes of yeast mRNAs for decapping-dependent 5' to 3' decay, but the molecular mechanisms controlling mRNA selectivity by the enzyme remain elusive. Through extensive genetic analyses we reveal that Dcp2 C-terminal domain cis-regulatory elements control decapping enzyme target specificity by orchestrating formation of distinct decapping complexes. Two Upf1-binding motifs direct the decapping enzyme to NMD substrates, a single Edc3-binding motif targets both Edc3 and Dhh1 substrates, and Pat1-binding leucine-rich motifs target Edc3 and Dhh1 substrates under selective conditions. Although it functions as a unique targeting component of specific complexes, Edc3 is a common component of multiple complexes. Scd6 and Xrn1 also have specific binding sites on Dcp2, allowing them to be directly recruited to decapping complexes. Collectively, our results demonstrate that Upf1, Edc3, Scd6, and Pat1 function as regulatory subunits of the holo-decapping enzyme, controlling both its substrate specificity and enzymatic activation.

Eukaryotic mRNA Decapping Activation

The 5'-terminal cap is a fundamental determinant of eukaryotic gene expression which facilitates cap-dependent translation and protects mRNAs from exonucleolytic degradation. Enzyme-directed hydrolysis of the cap (decapping) decisively affects mRNA expression and turnover, and is a heavily regulated event. Following the identification of the decapping holoenzyme (Dcp1/2) over two decades ago, numerous studies revealed the complexity of decapping regulation across species and cell types. A conserved set of Dcp1/2-associated proteins, implicated in decapping activation and molecular scaffolding, were identified through genetic and molecular interaction studies, and yet their exact mechanisms of action are only emerging. In this review, we discuss the prevailing models on the roles and assembly of decapping co-factors, with considerations of conservation across species and comparison across physiological contexts. We next discuss the functional convergences of decapping machineries with other RNA-protein complexes in cytoplasmic P bodies and compare current views on their impact on mRNA stability and translation. Lastly, we review the current models of decapping activation and highlight important gaps in our current understanding.

Biomolecular condensates amplify mRNA decapping by biasing enzyme conformation

Cells organize biochemical processes into biological condensates. P-bodies are cytoplasmic condensates that are enriched in enzymes important for mRNA degradation and have been identified as sites of both storage and decay. How these opposing outcomes can be achieved in condensates remains unresolved. mRNA decapping immediately precedes degradation, and the Dcp1/Dcp2 decapping complex is enriched in P-bodies. Here, we show that Dcp1/Dcp2 activity is modulated in condensates and depends on the interactions promoting phase separation. We find that Dcp1/Dcp2 phase separation stabilizes an inactive conformation in Dcp2 to inhibit decapping. The activator Edc3 causes a conformational change in Dcp2 and rewires the protein-protein interactions to stimulate decapping in condensates. Disruption of the inactive conformation dysregulates decapping in condensates. Our results indicate that the regulation of enzymatic activity in condensates relies on a coupling across length scales ranging from microns to ångstroms. We propose that this regulatory mechanism may control the functional state of P-bodies and related phase-separated compartments.

Dcp2: an mRNA decapping enzyme that adopts many different shapes and forms

•

Structure of the active state of the Dcp2 decapping enzyme.

•

Insights into the structural states that are sampled in solution.

•

Details regarding the intermolecular network that Dcp2 is embedded in.

Eukaryotic mRNAs contain a 5’ cap structure that protects the transcript against rapid exonucleolytic degradation. The regulation of cellular mRNA levels therefore depends on a precise control of the mRNA decapping pathways. The major mRNA decapping enzyme in eukaryotic cells is Dcp2. It is regulated by interactions with several activators, including Dcp1, Edc1, and Edc3, as well as by an autoinhibition mechanism. The structural and mechanistical characterization of Dcp2 complexes has long been impeded by the high flexibility and dynamic nature of the enzyme. Here we review recent insights into the catalytically active conformation of the mRNA decapping complex, the mode of action of decapping activators and the large interactions network that Dcp2 is embedded in.

Control of mRNA decapping by autoinhibition

5′ mediated cytoplasmic RNA decay is a conserved cellular process in eukaryotes. While the functions of the structured core domains in this pathway are well-studied, the role of abundant intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) is lacking. Here we reconstitute the Dcp1:Dcp2 complex containing a portion of the disordered C-terminus and show its activity is autoinhibited by linear interaction motifs. Enhancers of decapping (Edc) 1 and 3 cooperate to activate decapping by different mechanisms: Edc3 alleviates autoinhibition by binding IDRs and destabilizing an inactive form of the enzyme, whereas Edc1 stabilizes the transition state for catalysis. Both activators are required to fully stimulate an autoinhibited Dcp1:Dcp2 as Edc1 alone cannot overcome the decrease in activity attributed to the C-terminal extension. Our data provide a mechanistic framework for combinatorial control of decapping by protein cofactors, a principle that is likely conserved in multiple 5′ mRNA decay pathways.

The Translation Inhibitor Rocaglamide Targets a Bimolecular Cavity between eIF4A and Polypurine RNA

A class of translation inhibitors, exemplified by the natural product rocaglamide A (RocA), isolated from Aglaia genus plants, exhibits antitumor activity by clamping eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A (eIF4A) onto polypurine sequences in mRNAs. This unusual inhibitory mechanism raises the question of how the drug imposes sequence selectivity onto a general translation factor. Here, we determined the crystal structure of the human eIF4A1⋅ATP analog⋅RocA⋅polypurine RNA complex. RocA targets the "bi-molecular cavity" formed characteristically by eIF4A1 and a sharply bent pair of consecutive purines in the RNA. Natural amino acid substitutions found in Aglaia eIF4As changed the cavity shape, leading to RocA resistance. This study provides an example of an RNA-sequence-selective interfacial inhibitor fitting into the space shaped cooperatively by protein and RNA with specific sequences.

Structural and molecular mechanisms for the control of eukaryotic 5'-3' mRNA decay

5'-3' RNA decay pathways are critical for quality control and regulation of gene expression. Structural and biochemical studies have provided insights into the key nucleases that carry out deadenylation, decapping, and exonucleolysis during 5'-3' decay, but detailed understanding of how these activities are coordinated is only beginning to emerge. Here we review recent mechanistic insights into the control of 5'-3' RNA decay, including coupling between translation and decay, coordination between the complexes and activities that process 5' and 3' RNA termini, conformational control of enzymatic activity, liquid phase separation, and RNA modifications.

mRNA decapping: finding the right structures

In eukaryotes, the elimination of the m⁷GpppN mRNA cap, a process known as decapping, is a critical, largely irreversible and highly regulated step of mRNA decay that withdraws the targeted mRNAs from the pool of translatable templates. The decapping reaction is catalysed by a multi-protein complex formed by the Dcp2 catalytic subunit and its Dcp1 cofactor, a holoenzyme that is poorly active on its own and needs several accessory proteins (Lsm1-7 complex, Pat1, Edc1-2, Edc3 and/or EDC4) to be fully efficient. Here, we discuss the several crystal structures of Dcp2 domains bound to various partners (proteins or small molecules) determined in the last couple of years that have considerably improved our current understanding of how Dcp2, assisted by its various activators, is recruited to its mRNA targets and adopts its active conformation upon substrate recognition. We also describe how, over the years, elegant integrative structural biology approaches combined to biochemistry and genetics led to the identification of the correct structure of the active Dcp1-Dcp2 holoenzyme among the many available conformations trapped by X-ray crystallography.This article is part of the theme issue '5' and 3' modifications controlling RNA degradation'.

Structure of the activated Edc1-Dcp1-Dcp2-Edc3 mRNA decapping complex with substrate analog poised for catalysis

The conserved decapping enzyme Dcp2 recognizes and removes the 5′ eukaryotic cap from mRNA transcripts in a critical step of many cellular RNA decay pathways. Dcp2 is a dynamic enzyme that functions in concert with the essential activator Dcp1 and a diverse set of coactivators to selectively and efficiently decap target mRNAs in the cell. Here we present a 2.84 Å crystal structure of K. lactis Dcp1–Dcp2 in complex with coactivators Edc1 and Edc3, and with substrate analog bound to the Dcp2 active site. Our structure shows how Dcp2 recognizes cap substrate in the catalytically active conformation of the enzyme, and how coactivator Edc1 forms a three-way interface that bridges the domains of Dcp2 to consolidate the active conformation. Kinetic data reveal Dcp2 has selectivity for the first transcribed nucleotide during the catalytic step. The heterotetrameric Edc1–Dcp1–Dcp2–Edc3 structure shows how coactivators Edc1 and Edc3 can act simultaneously to activate decapping catalysis.

The decapping enzyme Dcp2 removes the 5′ eukaryotic cap from mRNA transcripts and acts in concert with its essential activator Dcp1 and various coactivators. Here the authors present the structure of the fully-activated mRNA decapping complex, which reveals how Dcp2 recognizes the cap substrate and coactivators Edc1 and Edc3 activate catalysis.

Mille viae in eukaryotic mRNA decapping

Cellular mRNA levels are regulated via rates of transcription and decay. Since the removal of the mRNA 5'-cap by the decapping enzyme DCP2 is generally an irreversible step towards decay, it requires regulation. Control of DCP2 activity is likely effected by two interdependent means: by conformational control of the DCP2-DCP1 complex, and by assembly control of the decapping network, an array of mutually interacting effector proteins. Here, we compare three recent and conformationally distinct crystal structures of the DCP2-DCP1 decapping complex in the presence of substrate analogs and decapping enhancers and we discuss alternative substrate recognition modes for the catalytic domain of DCP2. Together with structure-based insight into decapping network assembly, we propose that DCP2-mediated decapping follows more than one path.

Changes in conformational equilibria regulate the activity of the Dcp2 decapping enzyme

Crystal structures of enzymes are indispensable to understanding their mechanisms on a molecular level. It, however, remains challenging to determine which structures are adopted in solution, especially for dynamic complexes. Here, we study the bilobed decapping enzyme Dcp2 that removes the 5' cap structure from eukaryotic mRNA and thereby efficiently terminates gene expression. The numerous Dcp2 structures can be grouped into six states where the domain orientation between the catalytic and regulatory domains significantly differs. Despite this wealth of structural information it is not possible to correlate these states with the catalytic cycle or the activity of the enzyme. Using methyl transverse relaxation-optimized NMR spectroscopy, we demonstrate that only three of the six domain orientations are present in solution, where Dcp2 adopts an open, a closed, or a catalytically active state. We show how mRNA substrate and the activator proteins Dcp1 and Edc1 influence the dynamic equilibria between these states and how this modulates catalytic activity. Importantly, the active state of the complex is only stably formed in the presence of both activators and the mRNA substrate or the m7GDP decapping product, which we rationalize based on a crystal structure of the Dcp1:Dcp2:Edc1:m7GDP complex. Interestingly, we find that the activating mechanisms in Dcp2 also result in a shift of the substrate specificity from bacterial to eukaryotic mRNA.

Structural basis of mRNA-cap recognition by Dcp1-Dcp2

Removal of the 5′ cap on mRNA by the decapping enzyme Dcp2 is a critical step in 5′-to-3′ mRNA decay. Understanding the structural basis of Dcp2 activity has been a significant challenge because Dcp2 is dynamic, with weak affinity for cap substrate. Here we present a 2.6-Å-resolution crystal structure of a heterotrimer of fission yeast Dcp2, its essential activator Dcp1, and the human NMD cofactor PNRC2, in complex with a tight-binding cap analog. Cap binding is accompanied by a conformational change of Dcp2 to form a composite nucleotide binding site using conserved residues on the catalytic and regulatory domains. Kinetic analysis of PNRC2 reveals a conserved short linear motif enhances both substrate affinity and the catalytic step of decapping. These findings explain why Dcp2 requires a conformational change for efficient catalysis and reveals that coactivators can promote RNA binding and the catalytic step of decapping, possibly through different conformational states.

Structure of the active form of Dcp1-Dcp2 decapping enzyme bound to m7GDP and its Edc3 activator

Elimination of the 5' cap of eukaryotic mRNAs, known as decapping, is considered to be a crucial, irreversible and highly regulated step required for the rapid degradation of mRNA by Xrn1, the major cytoplasmic 5'-3' exonuclease. Decapping is accomplished by the recruitment of a protein complex formed by the Dcp2 catalytic subunit and its Dcp1 cofactor. However, this complex has a low intrinsic enzymatic activity and requires several accessory proteins such as the Lsm1-7 complex, Pat1, Edc1-Edc2 and/or Edc3 to be fully active. Here we present the crystal structure of the active form of the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis Dcp1-Dcp2 enzyme bound to its product (m⁷GDP) and its potent activator Edc3. This structure of the Dcp1-Dcp2 complex bound to a cap analog further explains previously published data on substrate binding and provides hints as to the mechanism of Edc3-mediated Dcp2 activation.

The S. pombe mRNA decapping complex recruits cofactors and an Edc1-like activator through a single dynamic surface

The removal of the 5' 7-methylguanosine mRNA cap structure (decapping) is a central step in the 5'-3' mRNA degradation pathway and is performed by the Dcp1:Dcp2 decapping complex. The activity of this complex is tightly regulated to prevent premature degradation of the transcript. Here, we establish that the aromatic groove of the EVH1 domain of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Dcp1 can interact with proline-rich sequences in the exonuclease Xrn1, the scaffolding protein Pat1, the helicase Dhh1, and the C-terminal disordered region of Dcp2. We show that this region of Dcp1 can also recruit a previously unidentified enhancer of decapping protein (Edc1) and solved the crystal structure of the complex. NMR relaxation dispersion experiments reveal that the Dcp1 binding site can adopt multiple conformations, thus providing the plasticity that is required to accommodate different ligands. We show that the activator Edc1 makes additional contacts with the regulatory domain of Dcp2 and that an activation motif in Edc1 increases the RNA affinity of Dcp1:Dcp2. Our data support a model where Edc1 stabilizes the RNA in the active site, which results in enhanced decapping rates. In summary, we show that multiple decapping factors, including the Dcp2 C-terminal region, compete with Edc1 for Dcp1 binding. Our data thus reveal a network of interactions that can fine-tune the catalytic activity of the decapping complex.

Sequences flanking the core-binding site modulate glucocorticoid receptor structure and activity

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) binds as a homodimer to genomic response elements, which have particular sequence and shape characteristics. Here we show that the nucleotides directly flanking the core-binding site, differ depending on the strength of GR-dependent activation of nearby genes. Our study indicates that these flanking nucleotides change the three-dimensional structure of the DNA-binding site, the DNA-binding domain of GR and the quaternary structure of the dimeric complex. Functional studies in a defined genomic context show that sequence-induced changes in GR activity cannot be explained by differences in GR occupancy. Rather, mutating the dimerization interface mitigates DNA-induced changes in both activity and structure, arguing for a role of DNA-induced structural changes in modulating GR activity. Together, our study shows that DNA sequence identity of genomic binding sites modulates GR activity downstream of binding, which may play a role in achieving regulatory specificity towards individual target genes.

Structure of the Dcp2-Dcp1 mRNA-decapping complex in the activated conformation

The removal of the mRNA 5' cap (decapping) by Dcp2 shuts down translation and commits mRNA to full degradation. Dcp2 activity is enhanced by activator proteins such as Dcp1 and Edc1. However, owing to conformational flexibility, the active conformation of Dcp2 and the mechanism of decapping activation have remained unknown. Here, we report a 1.6-Å-resolution crystal structure of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe Dcp2-Dcp1 heterodimer in an unprecedented conformation that is tied together by an intrinsically disordered peptide from Edc1. In this ternary complex, an unforeseen rotation of the Dcp2 catalytic domain allows residues from both Dcp2 and Dcp1 to cooperate in RNA binding, thus explaining decapping activation by increased substrate affinity. The architecture of the Dcp2-Dcp1-Edc1 complex provides a rationale for the conservation of a sequence motif in Edc1 that is also present in unrelated decapping activators, thus indicating that the presently described mechanism of decapping activation is evolutionarily conserved.

Two-headed tetraphosphate cap analogs are inhibitors of the Dcp1/2 RNA decapping complex

Dcp1/2 is the major eukaryotic RNA decapping complex, comprised of the enzyme Dcp2 and activator Dcp1, which removes the 5' m(7)G cap from mRNA, committing the transcript to degradation. Dcp1/2 activity is crucial for RNA quality control and turnover, and deregulation of these processes may lead to disease development. The molecular details of Dcp1/2 catalysis remain elusive, in part because both cap substrate (m(7)GpppN) and m(7)GDP product are bound by Dcp1/2 with weak (mM) affinity. In order to find inhibitors to use in elucidating the catalytic mechanism of Dcp2, we screened a small library of synthetic m(7)G nucleotides (cap analogs) bearing modifications in the oligophosphate chain. One of the most potent cap analogs, m(7)GpSpppSm(7)G, inhibited Dcp1/2 20 times more efficiently than m(7)GpppN or m(7)GDP. NMR experiments revealed that the compound interacts with specific surfaces of both regulatory and catalytic domains of Dcp2 with submillimolar affinities. Kinetics analysis revealed that m(7)GpSpppSm(7)G is a mixed inhibitor that competes for the Dcp2 active site with micromolar affinity. m(7)GpSpppSm(7)G-capped RNA undergoes rapid decapping, suggesting that the compound may act as a tightly bound cap mimic. Our identification of the first small molecule inhibitor of Dcp2 should be instrumental in future studies aimed at understanding the structural basis of RNA decapping and may provide insight toward the development of novel therapeutically relevant decapping inhibitors.

The BEACH Domain Protein SPIRRIG Is Essential for Arabidopsis Salt Stress Tolerance and Functions as a Regulator of Transcript Stabilization and Localization

Members of the highly conserved class of BEACH domain containing proteins (BDCPs) have been established as broad facilitators of protein-protein interactions and membrane dynamics in the context of human diseases like albinism, bleeding diathesis, impaired cellular immunity, cancer predisposition, and neurological dysfunctions. Also, the Arabidopsis thaliana BDCP SPIRRIG (SPI) is important for membrane integrity, as spi mutants exhibit split vacuoles. In this work, we report a novel molecular function of the BDCP SPI in ribonucleoprotein particle formation. We show that SPI interacts with the P-body core component DECAPPING PROTEIN 1 (DCP1), associates to mRNA processing bodies (P-bodies), and regulates their assembly upon salt stress. The finding that spi mutants exhibit salt hypersensitivity suggests that the local function of SPI at P-bodies is of biological relevance. Transcriptome-wide analysis revealed qualitative differences in the salt stress-regulated transcriptional response of Col-0 and spi. We show that SPI regulates the salt stress-dependent post-transcriptional stabilization, cytoplasmic agglomeration, and localization to P-bodies of a subset of salt stress-regulated mRNAs. Finally, we show that the PH-BEACH domains of SPI and its human homolog FAN (Factor Associated with Neutral sphingomyelinase activation) interact with DCP1 isoforms from plants, mammals, and yeast, suggesting the evolutionary conservation of an association of BDCPs and P-bodies.

The activation of the decapping enzyme DCP2 by DCP1 occurs on the EDC4 scaffold and involves a conserved loop in DCP1

The removal of the 5′-cap structure by the decapping enzyme DCP2 and its coactivator DCP1 shuts down translation and exposes the mRNA to 5′-to-3′ exonucleolytic degradation by XRN1. Although yeast DCP1 and DCP2 directly interact, an additional factor, EDC4, promotes DCP1–DCP2 association in metazoan. Here, we elucidate how the human proteins interact to assemble an active decapping complex and how decapped mRNAs are handed over to XRN1. We show that EDC4 serves as a scaffold for complex assembly, providing binding sites for DCP1, DCP2 and XRN1. DCP2 and XRN1 bind simultaneously to the EDC4 C-terminal domain through short linear motifs (SLiMs). Additionally, DCP1 and DCP2 form direct but weak interactions that are facilitated by EDC4. Mutational and functional studies indicate that the docking of DCP1 and DCP2 on the EDC4 scaffold is a critical step for mRNA decapping in vivo. They also revealed a crucial role for a conserved asparagine–arginine containing loop (the NR-loop) in the DCP1 EVH1 domain in DCP2 activation. Our data indicate that DCP2 activation by DCP1 occurs preferentially on the EDC4 scaffold, which may serve to couple DCP2 activation by DCP1 with 5′-to-3′ mRNA degradation by XRN1 in human cells.

The role of disordered protein regions in the assembly of decapping complexes and RNP granules

Removal of the 5′ cap structure is a critical step in mRNA turnover, yet key questions regarding the assembly and regulation of decapping complexes remain unanswered. This review provides comprehensive insight into the structural and biochemical properties of decapping factors. Jonas and Izaurralde highlight the plasticity of the decapping network and cover recent advances that reveal how short linear motifs (SliMs) in disordered regions help maintain interactions between decapping network members.

The removal of the 5′ cap structure by the decapping enzyme DCP2 inhibits translation and generally commits the mRNA to irreversible 5′-to-3′ exonucleolytic degradation by XRN1. DCP2 catalytic activity is stimulated by DCP1, and these proteins form the conserved core of the decapping complex. Additional decapping factors orchestrate the recruitment and activity of this complex in vivo. These factors include enhancer of decapping 3 (EDC3), EDC4, like Sm14A (LSm14A), Pat, the LSm1–7 complex, and the RNA helicase DDX6. Decapping factors are often modular and feature folded domains flanked or connected by low-complexity disordered regions. Recent studies have made important advances in understanding how these disordered regions contribute to the assembly of decapping complexes and promote phase transitions that drive RNP granule formation. These studies have also revealed that the decapping network is governed by interactions mediated by short linear motifs (SLiMs) in these disordered regions. Consequently, the network has rapidly evolved, and although decapping factors are conserved, individual interactions between orthologs have been rewired during evolution. The plasticity of the network facilitates the acquisition of additional subunits or domains in pre-existing subunits, enhances opportunities for regulating mRNA degradation, and eventually leads to the emergence of novel functions.

Active site conformational dynamics are coupled to catalysis in the mRNA decapping enzyme Dcp2

Removal of the 5' cap structure by Dcp2 is a major step in several 5'-3' mRNA decay pathways. The activity of Dcp2 is enhanced by Dcp1 and bound coactivators, yet the details of how these interactions are linked to chemistry are poorly understood. Here, we report three crystal structures of the catalytic Nudix hydrolase domain of Dcp2 that demonstrate binding of a catalytically essential metal ion, and enzyme kinetics are used to identify several key active site residues involved in acid/base chemistry of decapping. Using nuclear magnetic resonance and molecular dynamics, we find that a conserved metal binding loop on the catalytic domain undergoes conformational changes during the catalytic cycle. These findings describe key events during the chemical step of decapping, suggest local active site conformational changes are important for activity, and provide a framework to explain stimulation of catalysis by the regulatory domain of Dcp2 and associated coactivators.

The glucocorticoid receptor dimer interface allosterically transmits sequence-specific DNA signals

Glucocorticoid receptor binds to genomic response elements and regulates gene transcription with cell- and gene-specificity. Within a response element, the precise sequence to which the receptor binds has been implicated in directing its structure and activity. We use NMR chemical shift difference mapping to show that non-specific interactions with particular base positions within the binding sequence, such as those of the “spacer”, affect the conformation of distinct regions of the rat glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding domain. These regions include the DNA-binding surface, the “lever arm” and the dimerization interface, suggesting an allosteric pathway that signals between the DNA binding sequence and the associated dimer partner. Disrupting this path by mutating the dimer interface alters sequence-specific conformations, DNA-binding kinetics and transcriptional activity. Our study demonstrates that glucocorticoid receptor dimer partners collaborate to read DNA shape and to direct sequence specific gene activity.

Structural and functional control of the eukaryotic mRNA decapping machinery

The regulation of mRNA degradation is critical for proper gene expression. Many major pathways for mRNA decay involve the removal of the 5' 7-methyl guanosine (m(7)G) cap in the cytoplasm to allow for 5'-to-3' exonucleolytic decay. The most well studied and conserved eukaryotic decapping enzyme is Dcp2, and its function is aided by co-factors and decapping enhancers. A subset of these factors can act to enhance the catalytic activity of Dcp2, while others might stimulate the remodeling of proteins bound to the mRNA substrate that may otherwise inhibit decapping. Structural studies have provided major insights into the mechanisms by which Dcp2 and decapping co-factors activate decapping. Additional mRNA decay factors can function by recruiting components of the decapping machinery to target mRNAs. mRNA decay factors, decapping factors, and mRNA substrates can be found in cytoplasmic foci named P bodies that are conserved in eukaryotes, though their function remains unknown. In addition to Dcp2, other decapping enzymes have been identified, which may serve to supplement the function of Dcp2 or act in independent decay or quality control pathways. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: RNA Decay mechanisms.