1
|
Wang A, Yuan Y, Chu H, Gao Y, Jin Z, Jia Q, Zhu B. Somatostatin Receptor 2: A Potential Predictive Biomarker for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment. Pathol Oncol Res 2022; 28:1610196. [PMID: 35264912 PMCID: PMC8898825 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2022.1610196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2), the most abundant receptor of somatostatin (SST), possesses immunoreactivity and is altered in many cancers. However, the association between SSTR2 and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has not yet been reported. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) information across 20 cancers was collected from the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) and used to analyze the expression of SSTR2. Immune signatures collected from public databases, such as BioCarta or Reactome, were used to investigate the association between SSTR2 and the tumor microenviroment in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Data from cohorts treated with ICIs were collected to assess whether SSTR2 is associated with benefits from ICIs treatment. In the HPA, we found the SSTR2 IHC-positive rate of 13 cancers to be above 50%. Five types of cancer express SSTR2 mildly (positive rate: 25%-50%), while the remaining two types of cancer barely stained SSTR2-positive (positive rate: 0%-24%). In TCGA analysis, immune cell signatures and immune function pathways were enriched in high SSTR2 expression groups in most cancers. In each ICIs treated cohort, patients with high SSTR2 expression experienced numerically superior objective response rate (Braun: 14.8% vs 13.4%, p = 0.85; Gide: 69.4% vs 40.5%, p = 0.025; Mariathasan: 22.4% vs 16.7%, p = 0.233; Miao: 37.5% vs 11.8%; Riaz: 32.0% vs 7.7%, p = 0.067) and overall survival (Braun: HR (95%CI): 0.80 [0.62-1.04], p = 0.80; Gide: HR (95%CI): 0.61 [0.29-1.30], p = 0.20; Mariathasan: HR (95%CI): 0.83 [0.64-1.08], p = 0.16; Miao: HR (95%CI): 0.24 [0.086-0.65], p = 0.0028; Nathanson cohort: HR (95%CI): 0 [0-inf], p = 0.18; Riaz: HR (95%CI): 0.24 [0.086-0.65], p = 0.028) than patients with low SSTR2 expression. In pooled cohort, we found these differences were significant (Pool: 24.6% vs 16.7%, p = 0.0077; HR (95% CI): 0.77 [0.65-0.91], p = 0.0018). Our results suggest that SSTR2 is a potential predictive biomarker for response to ICIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aoyun Wang
- Institute of Cancer, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunotherapy, Chongqing, China
| | - Yixiao Yuan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Han Chu
- Center of Growth, Metabolism and Aging, Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yixing Gao
- Institute of Cancer, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunotherapy, Chongqing, China
| | - Zheng Jin
- Research Institute, GloriousMed Clinical Laboratory (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | - Qingzhu Jia
- Institute of Cancer, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunotherapy, Chongqing, China
| | - Bo Zhu
- Institute of Cancer, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunotherapy, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Suresh V, Sundaram R, Dash P, Sabat SC, Mohapatra D, Mohanty S, Vasudevan D, Senapati S. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor of Syrian golden hamster shares structural and functional similarity with human counterpart and promotes pancreatic cancer. Sci Rep 2019; 9:15507. [PMID: 31664114 PMCID: PMC6820718 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51947-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a pleiotropic cytokine that increasingly is being studied in cancers and inflammatory diseases. Though murine models have been instrumental in understanding the functional role of MIF in different pathological conditions, the information obtained from these models is biased towards a specific species. In experimental science, results obtained from multiple clinically relevant animal models always provide convincing data that might recapitulate in humans. Syrian golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus), is a clinically relevant animal model for multiple human diseases. Hence, the major objectives of this study were to characterize the structure and function of Mesocricetus auratus MIF (MaMIF) and finally evaluate its effect on pancreatic tumor growth in vivo. Initially, the recombinant MaMIF was cloned, expressed and purified in a bacterial expression system. The MaMIF primary sequence, biochemical properties, and crystal structure analysis showed greater similarity with human MIF. The crystal structure of MaMIF illustrates that it forms a homotrimer as known in human and mouse. However, MaMIF exhibits some minor structural variations when compared to human and mouse MIF. The in vitro functional studies show that MaMIF has tautomerase activity and enhances activation and migration of hamster peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Interestingly, injection of MaMIF into HapT1 pancreatic tumor-bearing hamsters significantly enhanced the tumor growth and tumor-associated angiogenesis. Together, the current study shows a structural and functional similarity between the hamster and human MIF. Moreover, it has demonstrated that a high level of circulating MIF originating from non-tumor cells might also promote pancreatic tumor growth in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Voddu Suresh
- Tumor Microenvironment and Animal Models Lab, Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.,Regional Centre for Biotechnology, Faridabad, Haryana, India
| | - Rajivgandhi Sundaram
- Macromolecular Crystallography Lab, Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.,Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Pujarini Dash
- Tumor Microenvironment and Animal Models Lab, Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Surendra Chandra Sabat
- Molecular Biology of Abiotic Stress Lab, Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Debasish Mohapatra
- Tumor Microenvironment and Animal Models Lab, Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Sneha Mohanty
- Department of Microbiology, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Dileep Vasudevan
- Macromolecular Crystallography Lab, Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
| | - Shantibhusan Senapati
- Tumor Microenvironment and Animal Models Lab, Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zanjani FS, Gaeni AA, Aras D, Akalan C. The effect of strength and endurance training on SSTR2 and SSTR5 in patients with colorectal cancer. J Exerc Rehabil 2019; 15:622-627. [PMID: 31523687 PMCID: PMC6732536 DOI: 10.12965/jer.1938250.125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The roots of apoptosis caused by the use of certain drugs in patients with colorectal cancer and certain drugs could be induced the change in genes SSTR2 and SSTR5. SSTRs play a role in colorectal cancer and it’s also known that exercise training has similar effects to certain drugs. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effects of a combined training program on hormonal and physiological changes in patients with colorectal cancer. Twenty patients with colorectal cancer were included in this study and divided into two groups as experimental (n=10) and control (n=10). The experimental group performed an exercise training program 5 days a week for 14 weeks. Blood samples were taken from the patients before and after the training program, and analyzed for somatostatin and its receptors. When the pretest effect excluded as statistical, there were no significant differences in SSRT2 (P>0.05) and SSRT5 (P>0.05) between the experimental and control groups. The hypothesis for this study was “SSTR2 and SSTR5 will improve after combined training program” however, in accordance with the results it was rejected. It seems that the determined training program for these patients need to be extended and performed for at least 3 months in a gradual incremental structure so that it could affect their health indicators significantly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farhad Safari Zanjani
- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Education, IA University Zanjan Branch, Zanjan, Iran
| | - Abbas Ali Gaeni
- Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Dicle Aras
- Department of Coaching Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cengiz Akalan
- Department of Coaching Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Günther T, Tulipano G, Dournaud P, Bousquet C, Csaba Z, Kreienkamp HJ, Lupp A, Korbonits M, Castaño JP, Wester HJ, Culler M, Melmed S, Schulz S. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CV. Somatostatin Receptors: Structure, Function, Ligands, and New Nomenclature. Pharmacol Rev 2019; 70:763-835. [PMID: 30232095 PMCID: PMC6148080 DOI: 10.1124/pr.117.015388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Somatostatin, also known as somatotropin-release inhibitory factor, is a cyclopeptide that exerts potent inhibitory actions on hormone secretion and neuronal excitability. Its physiologic functions are mediated by five G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) called somatostatin receptor (SST)1-5. These five receptors share common structural features and signaling mechanisms but differ in their cellular and subcellular localization and mode of regulation. SST2 and SST5 receptors have evolved as primary targets for pharmacological treatment of pituitary adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors. In addition, SST2 is a prototypical GPCR for the development of peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. This review article summarizes findings published in the last 25 years on the physiology, pharmacology, and clinical applications related to SSTs. We also discuss potential future developments and propose a new nomenclature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Günther
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Giovanni Tulipano
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Pascal Dournaud
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Corinne Bousquet
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Zsolt Csaba
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Hans-Jürgen Kreienkamp
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Amelie Lupp
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Márta Korbonits
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Justo P Castaño
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Hans-Jürgen Wester
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Michael Culler
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Shlomo Melmed
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Stefan Schulz
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rouanet M, Lebrin M, Gross F, Bournet B, Cordelier P, Buscail L. Gene Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: Specificity, Issues and Hopes. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18:ijms18061231. [PMID: 28594388 PMCID: PMC5486054 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18061231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2017] [Revised: 06/01/2017] [Accepted: 06/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A recent death projection has placed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma as the second cause of death by cancer in 2030. The prognosis for pancreatic cancer is very poor and there is a great need for new treatments that can change this poor outcome. Developments of therapeutic innovations in combination with conventional chemotherapy are needed urgently. Among innovative treatments the gene therapy offers a promising avenue. The present review gives an overview of the general strategy of gene therapy as well as the limitations and stakes of the different experimental in vivo models, expression vectors (synthetic and viral), molecular tools (interference RNA, genome editing) and therapeutic genes (tumor suppressor genes, antiangiogenic and pro-apoptotic genes, suicide genes). The latest developments in pancreatic carcinoma gene therapy are described including gene-based tumor cell sensitization to chemotherapy, vaccination and adoptive immunotherapy (chimeric antigen receptor T-cells strategy). Nowadays, there is a specific development of oncolytic virus therapies including oncolytic adenoviruses, herpes virus, parvovirus or reovirus. A summary of all published and on-going phase-1 trials is given. Most of them associate gene therapy and chemotherapy or radiochemotherapy. The first results are encouraging for most of the trials but remain to be confirmed in phase 2 trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Rouanet
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Rangueil, 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, Toulouse 31059, France.
- INSERM UMR 1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, Toulouse 31037, France.
| | - Marine Lebrin
- Center for Clinical Investigation 1436, Module of Biotherapy, CHU Rangueil, 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
| | - Fabian Gross
- Center for Clinical Investigation 1436, Module of Biotherapy, CHU Rangueil, 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
| | - Barbara Bournet
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Rangueil, 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, Toulouse 31059, France.
- INSERM UMR 1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, Toulouse 31037, France.
- University of Toulouse III, Medical School of Medicine Rangueil, Toulouse 31062, France.
| | - Pierre Cordelier
- INSERM UMR 1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, Toulouse 31037, France.
| | - Louis Buscail
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Rangueil, 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, Toulouse 31059, France.
- INSERM UMR 1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, Toulouse 31037, France.
- Center for Clinical Investigation 1436, Module of Biotherapy, CHU Rangueil, 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
- University of Toulouse III, Medical School of Medicine Rangueil, Toulouse 31062, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In nearly all cases, acromegaly is caused by excess GH from a pituitary adenoma, resulting in elevated circulating levels of GH and, subsequently, IGF-1. Treatment goals are to eliminate morbidity and restore the increased mortality to normal rates. Therapeutic strategies aim to minimize tumor mass and normalize GH and IGF-1 levels. Somatostatin analogues are the medical treatment of choice in acromegaly, as first-line or post-surgical therapy, and have proven efficacy in pituitary tumor volume reduction (TVR). METHODS Here we review the effects of somatostatin analogue therapy on pituitary tumor volume in patients with acromegaly. RESULTS TVR with somatostatin analogues may be mediated by direct anti-proliferative effects via activation of somatostatin receptors, or by indirect effects, such as angiogenesis inhibition, and is more pronounced when they are administered as first-line therapy. Various studies of first-line treatment with octreotide LAR have shown significant TVR in ≥73% of patients. First-line treatment with lanreotide Autogel has shown evidence of TVR, although more studies are needed. In a recent randomized, double-blind, 12-month trial in 358 medical-treatment-naïve acromegaly patients, significant TVR was achieved by 81% of patients administered pasireotide LAR and 77% administered octreotide LAR. Pre-operative somatostatin analogue therapy may also induce TVR and improve post-operative disease control compared with surgery alone. TVR is progressive with prolonged treatment, and decreased IGF-1 levels may be its best predictor, followed by age and degree of GH decrease. However, TVR does not always correlate with degree of biochemical control. CONCLUSION Somatostatin analogues (first- or second-line treatment) are the mainstay of medical therapy and, as first-line medical therapy, are associated with significant pituitary TVR in most patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annamaria Colao
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Sezione di Endocrinologia, Università Federico II di Napoli, via S Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Renata S Auriemma
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Sezione di Endocrinologia, Università Federico II di Napoli, via S Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Rosario Pivonello
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Sezione di Endocrinologia, Università Federico II di Napoli, via S Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hanoun N, Gayral M, Pointreau A, Buscail L, Cordelier P. Initial Characterization of Integrase-Defective Lentiviral Vectors for Pancreatic Cancer Gene Therapy. Hum Gene Ther 2016; 27:184-92. [PMID: 26731312 PMCID: PMC4779299 DOI: 10.1089/hum.2015.151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Accepted: 12/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The vast majority (85%) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) are discovered at too of a late stage to allow curative surgery. In addition, PDAC is highly resistant to conventional methods of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which only offer a marginal clinical benefit. Consequently, the prognosis of this cancer is devastating, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. In this dismal context, we recently demonstrated that PDAC gene therapy using nonviral vectors is safe and feasible, with early signs of efficacy in selected patients. Our next step is to transfer to the clinic HIV-1-based lentiviral vectors (LVs) that outshine other therapeutic vectors to treat experimental models of PDAC. However, a primary safety issue presented by LVs that may delay their use in patients is the risk of oncogenesis after vector integration in the host's cell DNA. Thus, we developed a novel anticancerous approach based on integrase-defective lentiviral vectors (IDLVs) and demonstrated that IDLVs can be successfully engineered to transiently deliver therapeutic genes to inhibit pancreatic cancer cells proliferation. This work stems for the use of therapeutic IDLVs for the management of PDAC, in forthcoming early phase gene therapy clinical trial for this disease with no cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naima Hanoun
- Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
- Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
| | - Marion Gayral
- Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
- Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
| | - Adeline Pointreau
- Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
- Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Louis Buscail
- Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
- Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre Cordelier
- Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
- Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
War SA, Kim B, Kumar U. Human somatostatin receptor-3 distinctively induces apoptosis in MCF-7 and cell cycle arrest in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2015; 413:129-44. [PMID: 26112183 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2015.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2015] [Revised: 06/12/2015] [Accepted: 06/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Somatostatin (SST) mediates cytostatic and pro-apoptotic effects through five somatostatin receptors (SSTR1-5). The modest clinical benefits of SST analogs in cancers of different origin such as breast cancer are attributed to diminished SSTRs expression at tumor sites. In the present study, SSTR3 was overexpressed in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231, and analyzed for downstream signaling molecules associated with cytostatic and cytotoxic effect. Cells overexpressing SSTR3 displayed inhibition of EGF induced proliferation and enhanced antiproliferative effect of SSTR3-specific agonist in comparison to non-transfected cells. SSTR3 overexpression in MCF-7 cells (R3-MCF-7) constitutively enhanced TUNEL staining, PARP-1 and p27(Kip1) expression suggesting apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest. Conversely, R3-MB-231 cells with SSTR3 overexpression exerted cytostatic and were devoid of any cytotoxic effects. The expression of PTP-1C and the status of ERK1/2, p38 and PI3K phosphorylation was modulated in a cell-specific manner. These findings provide new insights in understanding the antiproliferative role of SSTR3 in breast tumor biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sajad A War
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Brian Kim
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Ujendra Kumar
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kiviniemi A, Gardberg M, Frantzén J, Pesola M, Vuorinen V, Parkkola R, Tolvanen T, Suilamo S, Johansson J, Luoto P, Kemppainen J, Roivainen A, Minn H. Somatostatin receptor subtype 2 in high-grade gliomas: PET/CT with (68)Ga-DOTA-peptides, correlation to prognostic markers, and implications for targeted radiotherapy. EJNMMI Res 2015; 5:25. [PMID: 25977882 PMCID: PMC4420768 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-015-0106-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2015] [Accepted: 04/14/2015] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background High-grade gliomas (HGGs) express somatostatin receptors (SSTR), rendering them candidates for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Our purpose was to evaluate the potential of 68Ga-DOTA-1-Nal3-octreotide (68Ga-DOTANOC) or 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide (68Ga-DOTATOC) to target SSTR subtype 2 (SSTR2) in HGGs, and to study the association between SSTR2 expression and established biomarkers. Methods Twenty-seven patients (mean age 52 years) with primary or recurrent HGG prospectively underwent 68Ga-DOTA-peptide positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) before resection. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and receptor binding potential (BP) were calculated on PET/CT and disruption of blood–brain barrier (BBB) from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-T1-Gad). Tumor volume concordance between PET and MRI-T1-Gad was assessed by Dice similarity coefficient (DC) and correlation by Spearman’s rank. Immunohistochemically determined SSTR2 status was compared to receptor imaging findings, prognostic biomarkers, and survival with Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson chi-square, and multivariate Cox regression, respectively. Results All 19 HGGs with disrupted BBB demonstrated tracer uptake. Tumor SUVmax (2.25 ± 1.33) correlated with MRI-T1-Gad (r = 0.713, P = 0.001) although DC 0.41 ± 0.19 suggested limited concordance. SSTR2 immunohistochemistry was regarded as positive in nine HGGs (32%) but no correlation with SUVmax or BP was found. By contrast, SSTR2 expression was associated with IDH1 mutation (P = 0.007), oligodendroglioma component (P = 0.010), lower grade (P = 0.005), absence of EGFR amplification (P = 0.021), and longer progression-free survival (HR 0.161, CI 0.037 to 0.704, P = 0.015). Conclusions In HGGs, uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-peptides is associated with disrupted BBB and cannot be predicted by SSTR2 immunohistochemistry. Thus, PET/CT shows limited value to detect HGGs suitable for PRRT. However, high SSTR2 expression portends favorable outcome along with established biomarkers such as IDH1 mutation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01460706
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aida Kiviniemi
- Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521 Turku, Finland ; Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Maria Gardberg
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Janek Frantzén
- Department of Neurosurgery, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Marko Pesola
- Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Ville Vuorinen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Riitta Parkkola
- Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Tuula Tolvanen
- Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Sami Suilamo
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Jarkko Johansson
- Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Pauliina Luoto
- Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Jukka Kemppainen
- Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Anne Roivainen
- Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521 Turku, Finland ; Turku Center for Disease Modeling, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Heikki Minn
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, 20521 Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Buscail L, Bournet B, Vernejoul F, Cambois G, Lulka H, Hanoun N, Dufresne M, Meulle A, Vignolle-Vidoni A, Ligat L, Saint-Laurent N, Pont F, Dejean S, Gayral M, Martins F, Torrisani J, Barbey O, Gross F, Guimbaud R, Otal P, Lopez F, Tiraby G, Cordelier P. First-in-man phase 1 clinical trial of gene therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: safety, biodistribution, and preliminary clinical findings. Mol Ther 2015; 23:779-89. [PMID: 25586689 DOI: 10.1038/mt.2015.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2014] [Accepted: 12/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
This phase 1 trial was aimed to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary clinical activity of CYL-02, a nonviral gene therapy product that sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells to chemotherapy. CYL-02 was administrated using endoscopic ultrasound in 22 patients with pancreatic cancer that concomitantly received chemotherapy (gemcitabine). The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) exceeded the maximal feasible dose of CYL-02 and was not identified. Treatment-related toxicities were mild, without serious adverse events. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a dose-dependent increase in CYL-02 DNA exposure in blood and tumors, while therapeutic RNAs were detected in tumors. No objective response was observed, but nine patients showed stable disease up to 6 months following treatment and two of these patients experienced long-term survival. Panels of plasmatic microRNAs and proteins were identified as predictive of gene therapy efficacy. We demonstrate that CYL-02 nonviral gene therapy has a favorable safety profile and is well tolerated in patients. We characterize CYL-02 biodistribution and demonstrate therapeutic gene expression in tumors. Treated patients experienced stability of disease and predictive biomarkers of response to treatment were identified. These promising results warrant further evaluation in phase 2 clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Buscail
- 1] Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Toulouse - Rangueil, Toulouse, France [2] Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [3] Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [4] CIC Biotherapies 511, CHU Toulouse and INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Barbara Bournet
- 1] Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Toulouse - Rangueil, Toulouse, France [2] Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [3] Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Gilles Cambois
- Cayla InvivoGen Company, Research Department, Toulouse, France
| | - Hubert Lulka
- 1] Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [2] Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
| | - Naïma Hanoun
- 1] Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [2] Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
| | - Marlène Dufresne
- 1] Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [2] Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
| | - Aline Meulle
- 1] Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [2] Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
| | - Alix Vignolle-Vidoni
- 1] Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Toulouse - Rangueil, Toulouse, France [2] Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [3] Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
| | - Laetitia Ligat
- 1] Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [2] Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [3] Inserm, UMR1037 Proteomic Group-CRCT, Toulouse, France
| | - Nathalie Saint-Laurent
- 1] Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [2] Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [3] Inserm, UMR1037 Proteomic Group-CRCT, Toulouse, France
| | - Frédéric Pont
- 1] Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [2] Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [3] Inserm, UMR1037 Proteomic Group-CRCT, Toulouse, France
| | - Sébastien Dejean
- Department of Mathematics, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Marion Gayral
- 1] Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [2] Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Jérôme Torrisani
- 1] Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [2] Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
| | - Odile Barbey
- CIC Biotherapies 511, CHU Toulouse and INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Fabian Gross
- CIC Biotherapies 511, CHU Toulouse and INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Rosine Guimbaud
- 1] Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [2] Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [3] Department of Oncology, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Philippe Otal
- 1] Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [2] Department of Radiology, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Frédéric Lopez
- 1] Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [2] Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [3] Inserm, UMR1037 Proteomic Group-CRCT, Toulouse, France
| | - Gérard Tiraby
- Cayla InvivoGen Company, Research Department, Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre Cordelier
- 1] Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France [2] Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cai Z, Ouyang Q, Zeng D, Nguyen KN, Modi J, Wang L, White AG, Rogers BE, Xie XQ, Anderson CJ. 64Cu-labeled somatostatin analogues conjugated with cross-bridged phosphonate-based chelators via strain-promoted click chemistry for PET imaging: in silico through in vivo studies. J Med Chem 2014; 57:6019-29. [PMID: 24983404 PMCID: PMC4261236 DOI: 10.1021/jm500416f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
![]()
Somatostatin
receptor subtype 2 (sstr2) is a G-protein-coupled
receptor (GPCR) that is overexpressed in neuroendocrine tumors. The
homology model of sstr2 was built and was used to aid the design of
new somatostatin analogues modified with phosphonate-containing cross-bridged
chelators for evaluation of using them as PET imaging radiopharmaceuticals.
The new generation chelators were conjugated to Tyr3-octreotate
(Y3-TATE) through bioorthogonal, strain-promoted alkyne azide cycloaddition
(SPAAC) to form CB-TE1A1P–DBCO–Y3-TATE (AP) and CB-TE1K1P–PEG4–DBCO–Y3-TATE
(KP) in improved yields compared to standard direct conjugation methods
of amide bond formation. Consistent with docking studies, the clicked
bioconjugates showed high binding affinities to sstr2, with Kd values ranging from 0.6 to 2.3 nM. Selected
isomers of the clicked products were used in biodistribution and PET/CT
imaging. Introduction of the bulky dibenzocyclooctyne group in AP
decreased clearance rates from circulation. However, the additional
carboxylate group and PEG linker from the KP conjugate significantly
improved labeling conditions and in vivo stability of the copper complex
and ameliorated the slower pharmacokinetics of the clicked somatostatin
analogues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengxin Cai
- Department of Radiology, §Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy, ¶Drug Discovery Institute, ⊥Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, and ▲Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hennigs JK, Müller J, Adam M, Spin JM, Riedel E, Graefen M, Bokemeyer C, Sauter G, Huland H, Schlomm T, Minner S. Loss of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 in prostate cancer is linked to an aggressive cancer phenotype, high tumor cell proliferation and predicts early metastatic and biochemical relapse. PLoS One 2014; 9:e100469. [PMID: 25010045 PMCID: PMC4091868 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2014] [Accepted: 05/26/2014] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2) is the most frequently expressed SSTR subtype in normal human tissues. SSTR2 expression is differentially regulated in various tumor types and therapeutic somatostatin analogs binding to SSTR2 are in clinical use. In prostate cancers highly contradictory results in terms of SSTR2 expression and its consequences have been published over the past years. The aim of this study was to clarify prevalence and clinical significance of SSTR2 expression in prostate cancer. Therefore, quantitative immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a tissue microarray containing samples from 3,261 prostate cancer patients with extensive clinical and molecular cancer characteristics and oncological follow-up data was performed. IHC data was compared to publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus datasets of human prostate cancer gene expression arrays. While membranous SSTR2 staining was always seen in normal prostate epithelium, SSTR2 staining was absent in more than half (56.1%) of 2,195 interpretable prostate cancer samples. About 13% of all analyzed prostate cancers showed moderate to strong cytoplasmic and membranous SSTR2 staining. Staining intensities were inversely correlated with high Gleason grade, advanced pT category, high tumor cell proliferation (p<0.0001 each), high pre-operative PSA levels, (p = 0.0011) and positive surgical margins (p = 0.006). In silico analysis confirmed lower SSTR2 gene expression in prostate cancers vs. normal adjacent tissue (p = 0.0424), prostate cancer metastases vs. primary cancers (p = 0.0011) and recurrent vs. non-recurrent prostate cancers (p = 0.0438). PSA-free survival gradually declined with SSTR2 staining intensity (p<0.0001). SSTR2-negative cancers were more likely to develop metastases over time (p<0.05). In conclusion, most prostate cancers are indeed SSTR2-negative and loss of SSTR2 strongly predicts an unfavorable tumor phenotype and poor prognosis. Therefore, SSTR2 expression seems an important factor in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer and re-introduction of the receptor in SSTR2-negative prostate cancers may feature a promising target for novel gene therapy approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan K. Hennigs
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine II - Oncology, Hematology, BMT with Section Pneumology, Hubertus-Wald-Tumorzentrum/University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Julia Müller
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matti Adam
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University – School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Joshua M. Spin
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University – School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Emilia Riedel
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- Department of Internal Medicine II - Oncology, Hematology, BMT with Section Pneumology, Hubertus-Wald-Tumorzentrum/University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Guido Sauter
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hartwig Huland
- Martini Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Martini Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Minner
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cuevas-Ramos D, Fleseriu M. Somatostatin receptor ligands and resistance to treatment in pituitary adenomas. J Mol Endocrinol 2014; 52:R223-40. [PMID: 24647046 DOI: 10.1530/jme-14-0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Somatostatin (SST), an inhibitory polypeptide with two biologically active forms SST14 and SST28, inhibits GH, prolactin (PRL), TSH, and ACTH secretion in the anterior pituitary gland. SST also has an antiproliferative effect inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Such actions are mediated through five G-protein-coupled somatostatin receptors (SSTR): SSTR1-SSTR5. In GH-secreting adenomas, SSTR2 expression predominates, and somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs; octreotide and lanreotide) directed to SSTR2 are presently the mainstays of medical therapy. However, about half of patients show incomplete biochemical remission, but the definition of resistance per se remains controversial. We summarize here the determinants of SRL resistance in acromegaly patients, including clinical, imaging features as well as molecular (mutations, SSTR variants, and polymorphisms), and histopathological (granulation pattern, and proteins and receptor expression) predictors. The role of SSTR5 may explain the partial responsiveness to SRLs in patients with adequate SSTR2 density in the cell membrane. In patients with ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas, i.e. Cushing's disease (CD), SSTR5 is the most abundant receptor expressed and tumors show low SSTR2 density due to hypercortisolism-induced SSTR2 down-regulation. Clinical studies with pasireotide, a multireceptor-targeted SRL with increased SSTR5 activity, lead to approval of pasireotide for treatment of patients with CD. Other SRL delivery modes (oral octreotide), multireceptor-targeted SRL (somatoprim) or chimeric compounds targeting dopamine D2 receptors and SSTR2 (dopastatin), are briefly discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Cuevas-Ramos
- Department of MedicinePituitary Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USANorthwest Pituitary Center and Departments of Medicine and Neurological SurgeryOregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road (BTE 472), Portland, Oregon 97239, USA
| | - Maria Fleseriu
- Department of MedicinePituitary Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USANorthwest Pituitary Center and Departments of Medicine and Neurological SurgeryOregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road (BTE 472), Portland, Oregon 97239, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Puig-Domingo M, Luque RM, Reverter JL, López-Sánchez LM, Gahete MD, Culler MD, Díaz-Soto G, Lomeña F, Squarcia M, Mate JL, Mora M, Fernández-Cruz L, Vidal O, Alastrué A, Balibrea J, Halperin I, Mauricio D, Castaño JP. The truncated isoform of somatostatin receptor5 (sst5TMD4) is associated with poorly differentiated thyroid cancer. PLoS One 2014; 9:e85527. [PMID: 24465589 PMCID: PMC3897452 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2013] [Accepted: 11/28/2013] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Somatostatin receptors (ssts) are expressed in thyroid cancer cells, but their biological significance is not well understood. The aim of this study was to assess ssts in well differentiated (WDTC) and poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC) by means of imaging and molecular tools and its relationship with the efficacy of somatostatin analog treatment. Thirty-nine cases of thyroid carcinoma were evaluated (20 PDTC and 19 WDTC). Depreotide scintigraphy and mRNA levels of sst-subtypes, including the truncated variant sst5TMD4, were carried out. Depreotide scans were positive in the recurrent tumor in the neck in 6 of 11 (54%) PDTC, and in those with lung metastases in 5/11 cases (45.4%); sst5TMD4 was present in 18/20 (90%) of PDTC, being the most densely expressed sst-subtype, with a 20-fold increase in relation to sst2. In WDTC, sst2 was the most represented, while sst5TMD4 was not found; sst2 was significantly increased in PDTC in comparison to WDTC. Five depreotide positive PDTC received octreotide for 3–6 months in a pilot study with no changes in the size of the lesions in 3 of them, and a significant increase in the pulmonary and cervical lesions in the other 2. All PDTC patients treated with octreotide showed high expression of sst5TMD4. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that only sst5TMD4 discriminates between PDTC and WDTC. We conclude that sst5TMD4 is overexpressed in PDTC and may be involved in the lack of response to somatostatin analogue treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manel Puig-Domingo
- Service of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Germans Trias i Pujol Health Science Research Institute and Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | - Raúl M. Luque
- Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology University of Córdoba, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Jordi L. Reverter
- Service of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Germans Trias i Pujol Health Science Research Institute and Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| | - Laura M. López-Sánchez
- Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology University of Córdoba, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Manuel D. Gahete
- Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology University of Córdoba, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Córdoba, Spain
| | | | - Gonzalo Díaz-Soto
- Service of Endocrinology, Hospital Clínico de Valladolid, Valladolid, IEN-UVa, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Francisco Lomeña
- Service of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mattia Squarcia
- Service of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Luis Mate
- Department of Pathology, Germans Trias i Pujol Health Science Research Institute and Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| | - Mireia Mora
- Service of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Oscar Vidal
- Service of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Alastrué
- Service of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Germans Trias i Pujol Health Science Research Institute and Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| | - Jose Balibrea
- Service of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Germans Trias i Pujol Health Science Research Institute and Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
- Service of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute and Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Irene Halperin
- Service of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dídac Mauricio
- Service of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Germans Trias i Pujol Health Science Research Institute and Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| | - Justo P. Castaño
- Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology University of Córdoba, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Córdoba, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Giladi M, Schneiderman RS, Porat Y, Munster M, Itzhaki A, Mordechovich D, Cahal S, Kirson ED, Weinberg U, Palti Y. Mitotic disruption and reduced clonogenicity of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and in vivo by tumor treating fields. Pancreatology 2013; 14:54-63. [PMID: 24555979 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2013] [Revised: 09/30/2013] [Accepted: 11/16/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive cancer treatment modality approved for the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma. The present study determined the efficacy and mechanism of action of TTFields in preclinical models of pancreatic cancer. METHODS The effect of TTFields in vitro was assessed using cell counts, clonogenic assays, cell cycle analysis and analysis of mitotic figures. The effect in vivo effect was studied in the PC1-0 hamster pancreatic cancer model. RESULTS Application of TTFields in vitro showed a significant decrease in cell count, an increase in cell volume and reduced clonogenicity. Further analysis demonstrated significant increase in the number of abnormal mitotic figures, as well as a decrease in G2-M cell population. In hamsters with orthotopic pancreatic tumors, TTFields significantly reduced tumor volume accompanied by an increase in the frequency of abnormal mitotic events. TTFields efficacy was enhanced both in vitro and in vivo when combined with chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS These results provide the first evidence that TTFields serve as an effective antimitotic treatment in preclinical pancreatic cancer models and have a long term negative effect on cancer cell survival. These results make TTFields an attractive candidate for testing in the treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|
16
|
Theodoropoulou M, Stalla GK. Somatostatin receptors: from signaling to clinical practice. Front Neuroendocrinol 2013; 34:228-52. [PMID: 23872332 DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2013.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 241] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2013] [Revised: 06/13/2013] [Accepted: 07/12/2013] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Somatostatin is a peptide with a potent and broad antisecretory action, which makes it an invaluable drug target for the pharmacological management of pituitary adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors. Somatostatin receptors (SSTR1, 2A and B, 3, 4 and 5) belong to the G protein coupled receptor family and have a wide expression pattern in both normal tissues and solid tumors. Investigating the function of each SSTR in several tumor types has provided a wealth of information about the common but also distinct signaling cascades that suppress tumor cell proliferation, survival and angiogenesis. This provided the rationale for developing multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analogs and combination therapies with signaling-targeted agents such as inhibitors of the mammalian (or mechanistic) target of rapamycin (mTOR). The ability of SSTR to internalize and the development of rabiolabeled somatostatin analogs have improved the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marily Theodoropoulou
- Department of Endocrinology, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Kraepelinstrasse 10, 80804 Munich, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Peptide receptor targeting in cancer: the somatostatin paradigm. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEPTIDES 2013; 2013:926295. [PMID: 23476673 PMCID: PMC3582104 DOI: 10.1155/2013/926295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2012] [Revised: 12/10/2012] [Accepted: 12/28/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Peptide receptors involved in pathophysiological processes represent promising therapeutic targets. Neuropeptide somatostatin (SST) is produced by specialized cells in a large number of human organs and tissues. SST primarily acts as inhibitor of endocrine and exocrine secretion via the activation of five G-protein-coupled receptors, named sst1–5, while in central nervous system, SST acts as a neurotransmitter/neuromodulator, regulating locomotory and cognitive functions. Critical points of SST/SST receptor biology, such as signaling pathways of individual receptor subtypes, homo- and heterodimerization, trafficking, and cross-talk with growth factor receptors, have been extensively studied, although functions associated with several pathological conditions, including cancer, are still not completely unraveled. Importantly, SST exerts antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects on cancer cells in vitro, and on experimental tumors in vivo. Moreover, SST agonists are clinically effective as antitumor agents for pituitary adenomas and gastro-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. However, SST receptors being expressed by tumor cells of various tumor histotypes, their pharmacological use is potentially extendible to other cancer types, although to date no significant results have been obtained. In this paper the most recent findings on the expression and functional roles of SST and SST receptors in tumor cells are discussed.
Collapse
|
18
|
Durán-Prado M, Gahete MD, Hergueta-Redondo M, Martínez-Fuentes AJ, Córdoba-Chacón J, Palacios J, Gracia-Navarro F, Moreno-Bueno G, Malagón MM, Luque RM, Castaño JP. The new truncated somatostatin receptor variant sst5TMD4 is associated to poor prognosis in breast cancer and increases malignancy in MCF-7 cells. Oncogene 2012; 31:2049-61. [PMID: 21927030 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2011.389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Somatostatin receptors (sst1-5) are present in different types of tumors, where they inhibit key cellular processes such as proliferation and invasion. Although ssts are densely expressed in breast cancer, especially sst2, their role and therapeutic potential remain uncertain. Recently, we identified a new truncated sst5 variant, sst5TMD4, which is related to the abnormal response of certain pituitary tumors to treatment with somatostatin analogs. Here, we investigated the possible role of sst5TMD4 in breast cancer. This study revealed that sst5TMD4 is absent in normal mammary gland, but is abundant in a subset of poorly differentiated human breast tumors, where its expression correlated to that of sst2. Moreover, in the MCF-7 breast cancer model cell, sst5TMD4 expression increased malignancy features such as invasion and proliferation abilities (both in cell cultures and nude mice). This was likely mediated by sst5TMD4-induced increase in phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 and p-Akt levels, and cyclin D3 and Arp2/3 complex expression, which also led to mesenchymal-like phenotype. Interestingly, sst5TMD4 interacts physically with sst2 and thereby alters its signaling, enabling disruption of sst2 inhibitory feedback and providing a plausible basis for our findings. These results suggest that sst5TMD4 could be involved in the pathophysiology of certain types of breast tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Durán-Prado
- Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), and CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Córdoba, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
A switch of G protein-coupled receptor binding preference from phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-p85 to filamin A negatively controls the PI3K pathway. Mol Cell Biol 2011; 32:1004-16. [PMID: 22203038 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.06252-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Frequent oncogenic alterations occur in the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, urging identification of novel negative controls. We previously reported an original mechanism for restraining PI3K activity, controlled by the somatostatin G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) sst2 and involving a ligand-regulated interaction between sst2 with the PI3K regulatory p85 subunit. We here identify the scaffolding protein filamin A (FLNA) as a critical player regulating the dynamic of this complex. A preexisting sst2-p85 complex, which was shown to account for a significant basal PI3K activity in the absence of ligand, is disrupted upon sst2 activation. FLNA was here identified as a competitor of p85 for direct binding to two juxtaposed sites on sst2. Switching of GPCR binding preference from p85 toward FLNA is determined by changes in the tyrosine phosphorylation of p85- and FLNA-binding sites on sst2 upon activation. It results in the disruption of the sst2-p85 complex and the subsequent inhibition of PI3K. Knocking down FLNA expression, or abrogating FLNA recruitment to sst2, reversed the inhibition of PI3K and of tumor growth induced by sst2. Importantly, we report that this FLNA inhibitory control on PI3K can be generalized to another GPCR, the mu opioid receptor, thereby providing an unprecedented mechanism underlying GPCR-negative control on PI3K.
Collapse
|
20
|
Mittal Y, Pavlova Y, Garcia-Marcos M, Ghosh P. Src homology domain 2-containing protein-tyrosine phosphatase-1 (SHP-1) binds and dephosphorylates G(alpha)-interacting, vesicle-associated protein (GIV)/Girdin and attenuates the GIV-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt signaling pathway. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:32404-15. [PMID: 21799016 PMCID: PMC3173146 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.275685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2011] [Revised: 07/26/2011] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
GIV (Gα-interacting vesicle-associated protein, also known as Girdin) is a bona fide enhancer of PI3K-Akt signals during a diverse set of biological processes, e.g. wound healing, macrophage chemotaxis, tumor angiogenesis, and cancer invasion/metastasis. We recently demonstrated that tyrosine phosphorylation of GIV by receptor and non-receptor-tyrosine kinases is a key step that is required for GIV to directly bind and enhance PI3K activity. Here we report the discovery that Src homology 2-containing phosphatase-1 (SHP-1) is the major protein-tyrosine phosphatase that targets two critical phosphotyrosines within GIV and antagonizes phospho-GIV-dependent PI3K enhancement in mammalian cells. Using phosphorylation-dephosphorylation assays, we demonstrate that SHP-1 is the major and specific protein-tyrosine phosphatase that catalyzes the dephosphorylation of tyrosine-phosphorylated GIV in vitro and inhibits ligand-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of GIV downstream of both growth factor receptors and GPCRs in cells. In vitro binding and co-immunoprecipitation assays demonstrate that SHP-1 and GIV interact directly and constitutively and that this interaction occurs between the SH2 domain of SHP-1 and the C terminus of GIV. Overexpression of SHP-1 inhibits tyrosine phosphorylation of GIV and formation of phospho-GIV-PI3K complexes, and specifically suppresses GIV-dependent activation of Akt. Consistently, depletion of SHP-1 enhances peak tyrosine phosphorylation of GIV, which coincides with an increase in peak Akt activity. We conclude that SHP-1 antagonizes the action of receptor and non-receptor-tyrosine kinases on GIV and down-regulates the phospho-GIV-PI3K-Akt axis of signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mikel Garcia-Marcos
- Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093
| | - Pradipta Ghosh
- From the Departments of Medicine and
- Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hasskarl J, Kaufmann M, Schmid HA. Somatostatin receptors in non-neuroendocrine malignancies: the potential role of somatostatin analogs in solid tumors. Future Oncol 2011; 7:895-913. [PMID: 21732759 DOI: 10.2217/fon.11.66] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Somatostatin receptors (sstrs) are G-protein-coupled receptors that mediate various physiological effects when activated by the neuropeptide somatostatin or its synthetic analogs. In addition to the well-documented antisecretory effects of sstr2-preferential somatostatin analogs octreotide and lanreotide, ligand binding to sstr initiates an inhibitory action on tumor growth. This effect may result from both indirect actions (suppression of growth factors and growth-promoting hormones [e.g., GH/IGF-1 axis] and inhibition of angiogenesis) and direct actions (activation of antigrowth activities [e.g., apoptosis]). As solid tumor cells express multiple sstrs, there is a rationale to evaluate the potential antitumor effects of pasireotide (SOM230), a multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analog with high binding affinity for sstr1–3 and sstr5. Pasireotide reduces systemic IGF-1 levels more potently than currently available somatostatin analogs and has been well tolerated in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martina Kaufmann
- Novartis Pharma AG, Forum 1, Novartis Campus, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Herbert A Schmid
- Novartis Pharma AG, Forum 1, Novartis Campus, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Somatostatin inhibits cell migration and reduces cell counts of human keratinocytes and delays epidermal wound healing in an ex vivo wound model. PLoS One 2011; 6:e19740. [PMID: 21589940 PMCID: PMC3092774 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2010] [Accepted: 04/14/2011] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The peptide hormone somatostatin (SST) and its five G protein-coupled receptors
(SSTR1-5) were described to be present in the skin, but their cutaneous
function(s) and skin-specific signalling mechanisms are widely unknown. By using
receptor specific agonists we show here that the SSTRs expressed in
keratinocytes are functionally coupled to the inhibition of adenylate cyclase.
In addition, treatment with SSTR4 and SSTR5/1 specific agonists significantly
influences the MAP kinase signalling pathway. As epidermal hormone receptors in
general are known to regulate re-epithelialization following skin injury, we
investigated the effect of SST on cell counts and migration of human
keratinocytes. Our results demonstrate a significant inhibition of cell
migration and reduction of cell counts by SST. We do not observe an effect on
apoptosis and necrosis. Analysis of signalling pathways showed that somatostatin
inhibits cell migration independent of its effect on cAMP. Migrating
keratinocytes treated with SST show altered cytoskeleton dynamics with delayed
lamellipodia formation. Furthermore, the activity of the small GTPase Rac1 is
diminished, providing evidence for the control of the actin cytoskeleton by
somatostatin receptors in keratinocytes. While activation of all receptors leads
to redundant effects on cell migration, only treatment with a SSTR5/1 specific
agonist resulted in decreased cell counts. In accordance with reduced cell
counts and impaired migration we observe delayed re-epithelialization in an
ex vivo wound healing model. Consequently, our experiments
suggest SST as a negative regulator of epidermal wound healing.
Collapse
|
23
|
GPCR somatostatin receptor extracellular loop 2 is a key ectodomain for making subtype-selective antibodies with agonist-like activities in the pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor BON cell line. Pancreas 2010; 39:1155-66. [PMID: 20531241 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0b013e3181de8c05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) ectodomain of the G protein-coupled receptor class A is thought to function like an inactivation "lid." We created polyclonal somatostatin receptor ECL2 (anti-SSTR ECL2) antibodies to target this lid and to examine if these antibodies can selectively activate the SSTR. METHODS Western blots and live-cell immunofluorescence microscopy determined anti-SSTR ECL2 antibody receptor binding selectivity. 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium assay (MTS assay) and cell cycle assay (fluorescence-activated cell sorting) checked for antibody effect on antiproliferation. Nexin assay examined the antibody's ability to induce apoptosis. LANCE cAMP kit (Perkin Elmer) detected antibody-dependent cAMP decrease. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay measured antibody effect on suppressing serotonin secretion. Ligand-receptor binding interference assay with the fluorescent somatostatin (FAM-SST) was used to examine antibody interference to SST-SSTR binding. RESULTS Anti-SSTR ECL2 antibodies are SSTR subtype selective and agonist-like, and they suppress cell proliferation via cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. In addition, these antibodies decrease cAMP production and inhibit serotonin secretion. Interestingly, these antibodies do not interfere with SST-SSTR binding. CONCLUSIONS The ECL2 is an important ectodomain for G protein-coupled receptor activation and required for ligand binding selectivity. The anti-SSTR2, anti-SSTR3, and anti-SSTR5 ECL2 antibodies independently inhibited BON proliferation and decreased hormone secretion. Unlike octreotide, our antibodies do not interfere with SST-SSTR binding.
Collapse
|
24
|
Use of H19 Gene Regulatory Sequences in DNA-Based Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2010; 2010:178174. [PMID: 21052499 PMCID: PMC2967839 DOI: 10.1155/2010/178174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2010] [Accepted: 09/13/2010] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is the eighth most common cause of death from cancer in the world, for which palliative treatments are not effective and frequently accompanied by severe side effects. We propose a DNA-based therapy for pancreatic cancer using a nonviral vector, expressing the diphtheria toxin A chain under the control of the H19 gene regulatory sequences. The H19 gene is an oncofetal RNA expressed during embryo development and in several types of cancer. We tested the expression of H19 gene in patients, and found that 65% of human pancreatic tumors analyzed showed moderated to strong expression of the gene. In vitro experiments showed that the vector was effective in reducing Luciferase protein activity on pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. In vivo experiment results revealed tumor growth arrest in different animal models for pancreatic cancer. Differences in tumor size between control and treated groups reached a 75% in the heterotopic model (P = .037) and 50% in the orthotopic model (P = .007). In addition, no visible metastases were found in the treated group of the orthotopic model. These results indicate that the treatment with the vector DTA-H19 might be a viable new therapeutic option for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|
25
|
Fougner SL, Lekva T, Borota OC, Hald JK, Bollerslev J, Berg JP. The expression of E-cadherin in somatotroph pituitary adenomas is related to tumor size, invasiveness, and somatostatin analog response. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:2334-42. [PMID: 20335450 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2009-2197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Appropriate cell-to-cell adhesion is fundamental for the epithelial phenotype of pituitary cells. Loss of the adhesion protein E-cadherin has been associated with invasiveness, metastasis, and poor prognosis in cancers of epithelial origin. In somatotroph adenomas, a variable and reduced expression of E-cadherin has been demonstrated. In addition, nuclear translocation of E-cadherin was found to correlate with pituitary tumor invasion. OBJECTIVE The objective was to examine the protein expression of E-cadherin in somatotroph pituitary adenomas in relation to adenoma size, invasiveness, and somatostatin analog (SMS) efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eighty-three patients were included, and 29 were treated preoperatively with SMS. Adenoma E-cadherin protein expression was analyzed by Western blot (61 patients) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) (80 patients) with antibodies directed against both extracellular and intracellular domains (IHC). The acute (direct surgery group) and long-term (preoperatively treated group) SMS responses were evaluated. Baseline tumor volume and invasiveness were measured on magnetic resonance imaging scans. RESULTS Membranous E-cadherin was lost in several adenomas. Nine of these were nuclear E-cadherin positive. The E-cadherin protein expression correlated negatively to tumor size and positively to acute SMS response. Low E-cadherin levels (preoperatively treated group only) and loss of membranous E-cadherin correlated to tumor invasiveness. The E-cadherin level correlated positively to tumor reduction after SMS treatment, and adenomas with nuclear E-cadherin staining had lower IGF-I reduction and tumor shrinkage. Preoperatively treated adenomas had reduced E-cadherin protein levels, but the IHC expression was unaltered. CONCLUSION Reduced E-cadherin expression may correlate to a dedifferentiated phenotype in the somatotroph pituitary adenomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine Lyngvi Fougner
- Research Institute for Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Rikshospitalet Medical Centre, N-0027 Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tumoral prostate shows different expression pattern of somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) and phosphotyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 (PTPN6) according to tumor progression. Adv Urol 2009:723831. [PMID: 19365586 PMCID: PMC2667939 DOI: 10.1155/2009/723831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2008] [Revised: 02/01/2009] [Accepted: 02/16/2009] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate proliferation is dependent of androgens and many peptide hormones. Recent reports suggest that SSTR2 and SHP-1 were two fundamental components on antiproliferative effect of somatostatin. Many studies on SHP-1 revealed that the expression of this protein was diminished or abolished in several of the cancer cell lines and tissues examined. However, it is necessary to confront the cell lines data with real situation in cancer cases. Our studies have shown that epithelial expressions of both proteins, SHP-1 and SSTR2, in normal and benign hyperplasia are localized in the luminal side of duct and acinar cells. Also, SSTR2 is expressed in stromal cells. In malignant prostate tissue, SHP-1 was diminished in 28/45 cases or absent in 12/45 cases, whereas SSTR2 epithelial was diminished in 38/45 cases or lost in only 2/45 cases. The intensity of immunostained was highly negative correlated with Gleason grade for two proteins.
Collapse
|
27
|
Acunzo J, Thirion S, Roche C, Saveanu A, Gunz G, Germanetti AL, Couderc B, Cohen R, Figarella-Branger D, Dufour H, Brue T, Enjalbert A, Barlier A. Somatostatin receptor sst2 decreases cell viability and hormonal hypersecretion and reverses octreotide resistance of human pituitary adenomas. Cancer Res 2009; 68:10163-70. [PMID: 19074883 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-1857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In human somatotroph adenomas, growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion can be inhibited by somatostatin analogues such as octreotide. Unfortunately, serum GH levels reach normal values in only 60% of treated patients. The decreased sensitivity to octreotide is strongly related to a lower expression of somatostatin receptor sst2. In this present study, the sst2 gene was transferred by an adenoviral vector (Ad-sst2) in human somatotroph (n = 7) and lactotroph (n = 2) adenomas in vitro. Sst2 mRNA levels and sst2 immunostaining dramatically increased after infection. Ten days after infection at 20 multiplicity of infection (MOI), sst2 gene transfer decreased cell viability from 19% to 90% by caspase-dependent apoptosis. At low viral doses (5 MOI), Ad-sst2 decreased GH or prolactin (PRL) basal secretion and mRNA expression. Somatotroph tumors were classified in three groups according to their octreotide sensitivity. Four days after infection by 5 MOI Ad-sst2, the maximal GH suppression by octreotide increased from 31% to 57% in the octreotide partially resistant group and from 0% to 27% in the resistant ones. In the octreotide-sensitive group, EC(50) values significantly decreased from 1.3 x 10(-11) to 6.6 x 10(-13) mol/L without improving maximal GH suppression. Finally, lactotroph tumors, nonresponding to octreotide in basal conditions, became octreotide sensitive with a maximal PRL suppression of 43% at 10(-8) mol/L. Therefore, sst2 reexpression is able to improve octreotide sensitivity. Sst2 gene transfer may open new therapeutic strategies in treatment combined with somatostatin analogues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Acunzo
- Center of Research in Neurobiology-Neurophysiology of Marseille, UMR 6231 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Fédératif Jean-Roche, University of Méditerranée, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Li M, Wang X, Li W, Li F, Yang H, Wang H, Brunicardi FC, Chen C, Yao Q, Fisher WE. Somatostatin receptor-1 induces cell cycle arrest and inhibits tumor growth in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Sci 2008; 99:2218-23. [PMID: 18823376 DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00940.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Functional somatostatin receptors (SSTR) are lost in human pancreatic cancer. Transfection of SSTR-1 inhibited pancreatic cancer cell proliferation in vitro. We hypothesize that stable transfection of SSTR-1 may inhibit pancreatic cancer growth in vivo possibly through cell cycle arrest. In this study, we examined the expression of SSTR-1 mRNA in human pancreatic cancer tissue specimens, and investigated the effect of SSTR-1 overexpression on cell proliferation, cell cycle, and tumor growth in a subcutaneous nude mouse model. We found that SSTR-1 mRNA was downregulated in the majority of pancreatic cancer tissue specimens. Transfection of SSTR-1 caused cell cycle arrest at the G(0)/G(1) growth phase, with a corresponding decline of cells in the S (mitotic) phase. The overexpression of SSTR-1 significantly inhibited subcutaneous tumor size by 71% and 43% (n = 5, P < 0.05, Student's t-test), and inhibited tumor weight by 69% and 47% (n = 5, P < 0.05, Student's t-test), in Panc-SSTR-1 and MIA-SSTR-1 groups, respectively, indicating the potent inhibitory effect of SSTR-1 on pancreatic cancer growth. Our data demonstrate that overexpression of SSTR-1 significantly inhibits pancreatic cancer growth possibly through cell cycle arrest. This study suggests that gene therapy with SSTR-1 may be a potential adjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Li
- Michael E DeBakey Department of Surgery, Molecular Surgeon Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
The Effect of Transforming Growth Factor β on Human Neuroendocrine Tumor BON Cell Proliferation and Differentiation Is Mediated through Somatostatin Signaling. Mol Cancer Res 2008; 6:1029-42. [DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-07-2073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
30
|
Pyronnet S, Bousquet C, Najib S, Azar R, Laklai H, Susini C. Antitumor effects of somatostatin. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2008; 286:230-7. [PMID: 18359151 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2007] [Revised: 01/15/2008] [Accepted: 02/02/2008] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Since its discovery three decades ago as an inhibitor of GH release from the pituitary gland, somatostatin has attracted much attention because of its functional role in the regulation of a wide variety of physiological functions in the brain, pituitary, pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, adrenals, thyroid, kidney and immune system. In addition to its negative role in the control of endocrine and exocrine secretions, somatostatin and analogs also exert inhibitory effects on the proliferation and survival of normal and tumor cells. Over the past 15 years, studies have begun to reveal some of the molecular mechanisms underlying the antitumor activity of somatostatin. This review covers the present knowledge in the antitumor effect of somatostatin and analogs and discusses the perspectives of novel clinical strategies based on somatostatin receptor sst2 gene transfer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphane Pyronnet
- INSERM U858, Institut de Médecine Moléculaire de Rangueil, Dpt Cancer/E16, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse Cedex 4, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Gene therapy is a very attractive strategy in experimental cancer therapy. Ideally, the approach aims to deliver therapeutic genes selectively to cancer cells. However, progress in the improvement of gene therapy formulations has been hampered by difficulties in measuring transgene delivery and in quantifying transgene expression in vivo. In clinical trials, endpoints rely almost exclusively on the analysis of biopsies, which provide limited information. Non-invasive monitoring of gene delivery and expression is a very attractive approach as it can be repeated over time in the same patient to provide spatiotemporal information on gene expression on a whole body scale. Thus, imaging methods can uniquely provide researchers and clinicians the ability to directly and serially assess morphological, functional and metabolic changes consequent to molecular and cellular based therapies. This review highlights the various methods currently being developed in preclinical models.
Collapse
|
32
|
Vernejoul F, Ghénassia L, Souque A, Lulka H, Drocourt D, Cordelier P, Pradayrol L, Pyronnet S, Buscail L, Tiraby G. Gene therapy based on gemcitabine chemosensitization suppresses pancreatic tumor growth. Mol Ther 2006; 14:758-67. [PMID: 17000136 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2006.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2005] [Revised: 07/07/2006] [Accepted: 07/17/2006] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Excepting surgical resection, there is no efficient treatment against pancreatic cancer. The chemotherapeutic agent gemcitabine improves the patient's clinical status but survival is not prolonged. The aim of this study was to design a new strategy to render gemcitabine more efficient in the treatment of pancreatic cancer using gene therapy. We have generated a fusion gene (DCK::UMK) combining deoxycytidine kinase (DCK) and uridine monophosphate kinase (UMK), which converts gemcitabine into its toxic phosphorylated metabolite. Antitumor effects of DCK::UMK gene expression were tested in vitro and in vivo in an orthotopic transplantable model of pancreatic cancer established in hamsters. DCK::UMK sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine by reducing dramatically both in vitro cell viability and in vivo tumor volume. We found that in vivo expression of DCK::UMK resulted in an antitumor bystander effect due to apoptosis of untransduced cells. In vivo intratumoral gene transfer of DCK::UMK using the synthetic carrier PEI induced a potent tumor regression. Taken together, the results show that the fusion gene DCK::UMK sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine treatment to induce cell death by apoptosis and tumor regression. Intratumoral delivery of the DCK::UMK gene in combination with gemcitabine might be of high interest for pancreatic cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabienne Vernejoul
- INSERM U531, Institut Louis Bugnard IFR31, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil, 31403 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cordelier P, Bienvenu C, Lulka H, Marrache F, Bouisson M, Openheim A, Strayer DS, Vaysse N, Pradayrol L, Buscail L. Replication-deficient rSV40 mediate pancreatic gene transfer and long-term inhibition of tumor growth. Cancer Gene Ther 2006; 14:19-29. [PMID: 16990845 DOI: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive and devastating human malignancies. There is an urgent need for more effective therapy for patients with advanced disease. In this context, genetic therapy potentially represents a rational new approach to treating pancreatic cancer, which could provide an adjunct to conventional options. Because of the promise of recombinant SV40 vectors, we tested their ability to deliver a transgene, and to target a transcript, so as to inhibit pancreatic tumors growth in vivo. BxPC3 and Capan-1 cells were efficiently transduced using SV40 vectors without selection, as compared to synthetic vectors PEI. SV40 vectors were as efficient as adenoviral vectors, and provided long-term transgene expression. Next, we devised a SV40-derived, targeted gene therapy approach of pancreatic cancer, by combining hTR tumor-specific promoter with sst2 somatostatin receptor tumor-suppressor gene. In vitro cell proliferation was strongly impaired following administration of SV(hTR-sst2). SV40-derived sst2-mediated antiproliferative effect was dependent on the local production of somatostatin. In vivo, intratumoral gene transfer of sst2 using rSV40 vectors resulted in a marked inhibition of Capan-1 tumor progression, and proliferation. These results represent the initial steps toward a novel approach to the gene therapy of pancreatic cancer using SV40 as a vector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Cordelier
- INSERM U531, Institut Louis Bugnard, IFR31, Toulouse, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
The development of the endocrine pancreas is regulated by numerous transcription and growth factors. Somatostatin (SST) is present in many tissues and acts as a neurotransmitter and autocrine/paracrine/endocrine regulator in response to ions, nutrients, peptides, and hormones as well as neurotransmitters. In the pancreas, there is evidence that SST acts an inhibitory paracrine regulator of hormone secretion. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are a family of 5 transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors, which are widely expressed in mammals including humans. SSTRs regulate multiple downstream signal transduction pathways that mediate inhibitory effects. These receptors also exhibit age- and tissue-specific expression patterns. Interactions of SST and SSTRs are not only important during normal pancreas development, but have also been implicated in many pancreatic diseases such as diabetes mellitus and pancreatic cancer. In this review article, we use evidence from recently published animal studies to present the critical roles of SST and SSTRs proteins in the development of the endocrine pancreas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikiforos Ballian
- The Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a need for novel antitumor agents that demonstrate efficacy in currently refractory tumors without adding to the toxicity of therapy. The somatostatin analogs, which have demonstrated antineoplastic activities in experimental tumor models, and good tolerability and safety profiles are attractive candidates. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from preclinical studies provide evidence for direct and indirect mechanisms by which somatostatin analogs exert antitumor effects. RESULTS Direct antitumor activities, mediated through somatostatin receptors (sst(1)-sst(5)) expressed in tumor cells, include blockade of autocrine/paracrine growth-promoting hormone and growth factor production, inhibition of growth factor-mediated mitogenic signals and induction of apoptosis. Indirect antitumor effects include inhibition of growth-promoting hormone and growth factor secretion, and antiangiogenic actions. Many human tumors express more than one somatostatin receptor subtype, with sst(2) being predominant. Somatostatin analogs such as octreotide and lanreotide, which present a high affinity for sst(2), are in current clinical use to alleviate symptoms in patients with endocrine tumors, and radiolabeled somatostatin analogs have been developed for diagnosis and radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS While the rationale exists for the use of somatostatin analogs as antitumor agents, studies are ongoing to identify analogs with activity across the range of receptor subtypes to maximize the potential of such treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Susini
- INSERM U151, Institut Louis Bugnard, Toulouse, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
The prognosis of patients with some kinds of cancers whose patients are often found unresectable upon diagnosis is still dismal. In these fields, development of a new therapeutic modality is needed and gene therapy represents one promising strategy. So far, numerous cancer gene therapy clinical trials based on these principles have been carried out and have shown the safety of such modalities, but have fallen short of the initial expectations to cure cancers. In this review, we would like to make a problem-oriented discussion of current status of cancer gene therapy research by using mainly gastrointestinal cancers as an example. In order to overcome obstacles for full realization of cancer gene therapy, numerous researches have been conducted by many researchers. Various cancer-selective and non-selective genes, as well as lytic viruses themselves have been employed for gene therapy. In the context of gene delivery method, different kinds of viral and non-viral strategies have been utilized. In addition, surrogate assays, such as soluble markers and imaging, have been developed for safer and more informative clinical trials. Many experiments and clinical trials to date have figured out current obstacles for the realization of an effective cancer gene therapy modality. Tireless efforts to overcome such hurdles and continuous infusion of novel concepts into this field should lead to break through technologies and the cure of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masato Yamamoto
- BMR2-410, 901 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294-2172, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Carrere N, Vernejoul F, Souque A, Asnacios A, Vaysse N, Pradayrol L, Susini C, Buscail L, Cordelier P. Characterization of the Bystander Effect of Somatostatin Receptor sst2 After In Vivo Gene Transfer into Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Hum Gene Ther 2005; 16:1175-93. [PMID: 16218779 DOI: 10.1089/hum.2005.16.1175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive and devastating human malignancies. The present study was conducted to determine whether in vivo sst2 gene transfer into human pancreatic tumors would impair tumor progression, and to characterize sst2 antitumoral bystander mechanisms. sst2 administration, using the synthetic vector PEI, strongly inhibited tumor progression of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma, in vivo. sst2 gene transfer induced intratumoral production of its ligand somatostatin. Disruption of this autocrine loop by RNA interference completely reversed sst2 antitumoral activity. Mice depleted of natural killer (NK) cells did not hamper sst2 tumor growth inhibition. However, microvessel density and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression were markedly reduced in sst2-transfected tumors, whereas sst3 somatostatin receptor was upregulated. Depleting somatostatin by RNA interference completely abolished the sst2 inhibitory effect on VEGF expression and tumor angiogenesis, and sst2-induced sst3 expression in peripheral tumor vessels. We conclude that in vivo sst2 gene transfer elicited intratumoral somatostatin production and strongly impaired human pancreatic tumor growth. NK cells were not involved in this antitumoral bystander effect. VEGF and tumor vascularization were identified as novel targets for sst2-mediated antitumoral bystander effect. sst3 somatostatin receptor was upregulated in sst2-transfected tumors. Therefore, in vivo gene delivery of sst2 receptor to target the angiogenic process in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma might be a new therapeutic approach for treatment of pancreatic cancer in patients with unresectable disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Carrere
- INSERM U531, Institut Louis Bugnard, IFR31, CHU Rangueil, 31432 Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Carrere N, Vernejoul F, Souque A, Asnacios A, Vaysse N, Pradayrol L, Susini C, Buscail L, Cordelier P. Characterization of the Bystander Effect of Somatostatin Receptor sst2 After In Vivo Gene Transfer into Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Hum Gene Ther 2005. [DOI: 10.1089/hum.2005.16.ft-120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
39
|
Abstract
During the last decade significant advances in gene therapy have made it possible to treat various pancreatic disorders in both animal models and in humans. For example, insulin gene delivery to non-beta-cell tissues has been shown to reverse hyperglycemia in diabetic mice, and islet transplantation, based on in vitro differentiation of beta cells and concomitant gene targeting to prevent host autoimmune responses, has become more feasible. Additionally, introduction of the glucokinase regulatory protein and protein kinase C-zeta have been shown to improve glucose tolerance in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus animal models. Pancreatic cancer studies utilize several DNA-based strategies for tumor treatment including introduction of tumor suppressor genes, suppression of oncogenes, suicide gene/prodrug therapy, and restricted replication-competent virus therapy. Tumor-specific targeting is an important part of suicide gene therapy, and tumor-specific promoters are used for cell-specific targeting. Tumor-specific suicide gene therapy directed by the rat insulin promoter has been used to eliminate insulinoma tumors in a mouse model. This review compiles a compendium of information related to the treatment of pancreatic disorders using gene therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiichi Tamada
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
|
41
|
Wang XP, Li ZJ, Magnusson J, Brunicardi FC. Tissue MicroArray Analyses of Pancreatic Duodenal Homeobox-1 in Human Cancers. World J Surg 2005; 29:334-8. [PMID: 15706433 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-004-7823-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
In previous studies, we demonstrated that rat insulin promoter (RIP)-driven gene therapy successfully targeted human pancreatic tumor PANC-1 cells and mouse insulinoma NIT-1 cells, which are both pancreatic duodenal homeobox-1 (PDX-1)-positive. The purpose of this study was to perform a human tissue array analysis to determine potential targets for RIP-driven gene therapy. A custom-designed tissue MicroArray analysis of various human cancer specimens was performed using a PDX-1 polyclonal antibody generated in our laboratory. The custom-designed Tissue MicroArray of human tumor specimens consists of human cancer specimens from different origins, such as the pancreas, breast, colon, prostate, kidney, liver, lung, and ovary. A panel of normal human specimens from 20 organs or tissues was used as a control. All tissues were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. The immunohistochemistry studies of the cytoplasm and the nuclear expression levels were compared using the Loda method and blind reviews. Data are presented as the mean +/- SEM (p < 0.05 was considered significant by the unpaired student t-test). PDX-1 expression intensity was elevated in both benign and malignant tissues from the same patient with pancreas, breast, colon, prostate, and kidney cancers, whereas normal human tissues from control subjects without cancer did not express PDX-1. These results suggest that PDX-1 is an early marker for these cancers and could be potentially used as a diagnostic parameter and perhaps could be targeted by PDX-1-activated gene therapies, such as RIP-TK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Ping Wang
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 6550 Fannin Street, Suite 1661, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Li M, Fisher WE, Kim HJ, Wang X, Brunicardi CF, Chen C, Yao Q. Somatostatin, Somatostatin Receptors, and Pancreatic Cancer. World J Surg 2005; 29:293-6. [PMID: 15706439 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-004-7814-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Somatostatin may play an important role in the regulation of cancer growth including pancreatic cancer by interaction with somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) on the cell surface. Five SSTRs were cloned, and the function of these SSTRs is addressed in this review. SSTR-2, SSTR-5, and SSTR-1 are thought to play major roles in inhibiting pancreatic cancer growth both in vitro and in vivo. SSTR-3 may be involved in mediating apoptosis, but the role of SSTR-4 is not clear. In most pancreatic cancers, functional SSTRs are absent. Reintroduction of SSTR genes has been shown to inhibit pancreatic cancer growth in cell cultures and animal models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Li
- Elkins Pancreas Center, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine and the Methodist Hospital, 6550 Fannin Street, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Dilley WG, Kalyanaraman S, Verma S, Cobb JP, Laramie JM, Lairmore TC. Global gene expression in neuroendocrine tumors from patients with the MEN1 syndrome. Mol Cancer 2005; 4:9. [PMID: 15691381 PMCID: PMC549185 DOI: 10.1186/1476-4598-4-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2004] [Accepted: 02/03/2005] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1, OMIM 131100) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by endocrine tumors of the parathyroids, pancreatic islets and pituitary. The disease is caused by the functional loss of the tumor suppressor protein menin, coded by the MEN1 gene. The protein sequence has no significant homology to known consensus motifs. In vitro studies have shown menin binding to JunD, Pem, Smad3, NF-kappaB, nm23H1, and RPA2 proteins. However, none of these binding studies have led to a convincing theory of how loss-of-menin leads to neoplasia. Results Global gene expression studies on eight neuroendocrine tumors from MEN1 patients and 4 normal islet controls was performed utilizing Affymetrix U95Av2 chips. Overall hierarchical clustering placed all tumors in one group separate from the group of normal islets. Within the group of tumors, those of the same type were mostly clustered together. The clustering analysis also revealed 19 apoptosis-related genes that were under-expressed in the group of tumors. There were 193 genes that were increased/decreased by at least 2-fold in the tumors relative to the normal islets and that had a t-test significance value of p < = 0.005. Forty-five of these genes were increased and 148 were decreased in the tumors relative to the controls. One hundred and four of the genes could be classified as being involved in cell growth, cell death, or signal transduction. The results from 11 genes were selected for validation by quantitative RT-PCR. The average correlation coefficient was 0.655 (range 0.235–0.964). Conclusion This is the first analysis of global gene expression in MEN1-associated neuroendocrine tumors. Many genes were identified which were differentially expressed in neuroendocrine tumors arising in patients with the MEN1 syndrome, as compared with normal human islet cells. The expression of a group of apoptosis-related genes was significantly suppressed, suggesting that these genes may play crucial roles in tumorigenesis in this syndrome. We identified a number of genes which are attractive candidates for further investigation into the mechanisms by which menin loss causes tumors in pancreatic islets. Of particular interest are: FGF9 which may stimulate the growth of prostate cancer, brain cancer and endometrium; and IER3 (IEX-1), PHLDA2 (TSS3), IAPP (amylin), and SST, all of which may play roles in apoptosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William G Dilley
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Sulekha Verma
- John Cochran Veterans Administration Medical Center, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - J Perren Cobb
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jason M Laramie
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Terry C Lairmore
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- John Cochran Veterans Administration Medical Center, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Zitzmann S, Mier W, Schad A, Kinscherf R, Askoxylakis V, Krämer S, Altmann A, Eisenhut M, Haberkorn U. A New Prostate Carcinoma Binding Peptide (DUP-1) for Tumor Imaging and Therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2005. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.139.11.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: Prostate carcinomas belong to the most widespread tumors, and their number is increasing. Imaging modalities used for diagnosis, such as ultrasound, computed tomography, and positron emission tomography, often produce poor results. Radiolabeled peptides with high sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer would be a desirable tool for tumor diagnosis and treatment.
Experimental Design: We used phage display and the prostate-specific membrane antigen–negative cell line DU-145 to identify a peptide. The isolated DUP-1 was tested invitro for its binding specificity, kinetics, and affinity. Internalization of the peptide was evaluated with confocal microscopy. The tumor accumulation in a nude mouse model was analyzed with 131I-labeled DUP-1 in PC-3 and DU-145 prostate tumors as well as in the rat prostate tumor model AT-1.
Results: The synthesized peptide showed rapid binding kinetics peaking at 10 minutes. It shows specific binding to prostate carcinoma cells but low binding affinity to nontumor cells. Peptide binding is competed with unlabeled DUP-1, and a time-dependent internalization into DU-145 cells was shown. Biodistribution studies of DUP-1 in nude mice with s.c. transplanted DU-145 and PC-3 tumors showed a tumor accumulation of 5% and 7% injected dose per gram, and bound peptide could not be removed by perfusion. The rat prostate tumor model showed an increase of radioactivity in the prostate tumor up to 300% in comparison with normal prostate tissue.
Conclusions: DUP-1 holds promise as a lead peptide structure applicable in the development of new diagnostic tracers or anticancer agents that specifically target prostate carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Zitzmann
- 1Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine and
- 3Nuclear Medicine,
| | | | | | - Ralf Kinscherf
- 5Anatomy and Cell Biology III, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Annette Altmann
- 1Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine and
- 3Nuclear Medicine,
| | - Michael Eisenhut
- 2Department of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center; Departments of
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- 1Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine and
- 3Nuclear Medicine,
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zapata PD, Colas B, López-Ruiz P, Ropero RM, Martín RM, Rodríguez FJ, González FJ, López JI, Angulo JC. [Phosphotyrosine phosphatase SHP-1, somatostatin and prostate cancer]. Actas Urol Esp 2004; 28:269-85. [PMID: 15248398 DOI: 10.1016/s0210-4806(04)73075-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
We review the mechanisms involved in prostatic growth based on androgens and product of neuroendocrine secretion, with special reference to the role of somatostatin (SS) in the inhibition of neoplastic growth. Our contributions in the field confirm the antiproliferative effect of SS on the prostate is mediated by phosphotyrosine phosphatase SHP-1, that is present in human prostate. This enzyme plays a role in the control of prostatic cell proliferation and in the progression of prostate cancer. Besides, we consider its presence may determine the therapeutic potential of SS in the control of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P D Zapata
- Departamento de Bioquímica, Universidad de Alcalá, Servicio de Urología, Hospital Príncipe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kumar M, Liu ZR, Thapa L, Wang DY, Tian R, Qin RY. Mechanisms of inhibition of growth of human pancreatic carcinoma implanted in nude mice by somatostatin receptor subtype 2. Pancreas 2004; 29:141-51. [PMID: 15257106 DOI: 10.1097/00006676-200408000-00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Several studies reported that somatostatin receptor subtypes, especially subtype 2 (SSTR2), exerted their cytostatic and/or cytotoxic effects on various types of tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the antitumor effect of SSTR2 gene transfer to the pancreatic cancer cell line PC-3 and the mechanisms involved in this effect. METHODS The full-length human SSTR2 cDNA was introduced into pancreatic cancer cell line PC-3 by lipofectamine-mediated transfection; positive clones were screened by G418, and stable expression of SSTR2 was detected by the immunohistochemical SABC method and RT-PCR. Athymic mice were separately xenografted with SSTR2-expressing cells (experimental group), vector control, and mock control cells. TUNEL assay was used to determine the apoptotic index (AI) in the tumors of these groups. The immunohistochemical SP method was used to determine expression of apoptosis-regulating genes Bcl-2 and Bax and re-expression of SSTR2 and to assess intratumoral microvessel density (MVD). Moreover, tumor volume and weight were compared among these 3 groups. RESULTS Restoration of SSTR2 was observed in the experimental group both in vitro and in vivo. The AI was significantly higher in the experimental group (3.39 +/- 0.84%) compared with that in the vector control (0.69 +/- 0.08%) and mock control (0.68 +/- 0.09%) (P < 0.05). MVD was significantly lower in the experimental group (6.30 +/- 1.71) than that in the vector control (12.64 +/- 1.69) and mock control (13.50 +/- 1.86) (P < 0.05). Furthermore, a significant decrease in Bcl-2 and increase in Bax protein expression were detected in the experimental group compared with the vector control and mock control (P < 0.05). A significant negative correlation of protein expression between Bcl-2/Bax ratio and SSTR2 was observed in these tumors (P < 0.05). Tumor volume and weight were significantly decreased in the experimental group compared with the vector control and mock control (P < 0.05) groups. However, no significant differences were observed between the vector control and mock control (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Re-expression of the SSTR2 gene, the expression of which is frequently lost in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma, induces apoptosis, which may be mediated via down-regulation of Bcl-2 and up-regulation of Bax (alteration of Bcl-2/Bax ratio) and inhibits tumor angiogenesis in pancreatic carcinoma, resulting in inhibition of tumor growth.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adenocarcinoma/blood supply
- Adenocarcinoma/pathology
- Adenocarcinoma/therapy
- Animals
- Apoptosis
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
- Genes, bcl-2
- Genetic Therapy
- Humans
- Male
- Mice
- Mice, Inbred BALB C
- Mice, Nude
- Neovascularization, Pathologic/prevention & control
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/blood supply
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/biosynthesis
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/genetics
- RNA, Messenger/biosynthesis
- RNA, Messenger/genetics
- Receptors, Somatostatin/biosynthesis
- Receptors, Somatostatin/genetics
- Receptors, Somatostatin/physiology
- Recombinant Fusion Proteins/physiology
- Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Transfection
- Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
- bcl-2-Associated X Protein
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manoj Kumar
- Department of Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Grötzinger C, Wiedenmann B. Somatostatin receptor targeting for tumor imaging and therapy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004; 1014:258-64. [PMID: 15153442 DOI: 10.1196/annals.1294.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Somatostatin receptors and their ligands constitute the prototype targeting system for contrast-enhanced detection and radiotherapy of cancer. Radiolabeled synthetic analogs of somatostatin have been successfully used in routine molecular imaging of primary gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and their metastases for more than 15 years. Likewise, analog conjugates for radiation therapy have been developed and have been under clinical trial for several years. The vast amount of knowledge accumulated by both basic and clinical science has made the somatostatin/somatostatin receptor system a popular model for new targeting strategies in imaging and therapy. Among those, the use of near-infrared fluorescent dye-peptide conjugates for the detection of tumors by endoscopy, mammography, or intraoperative imaging is one of the most promising. This article reviews recent developments in the field and discusses concepts for receptor-targeted molecular imaging and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Grötzinger
- Charité Medical School, Campus Virchow Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bousquet C, Guillermet J, Vernejoul F, Lahlou H, Buscail L, Susini C. Somatostatin receptors and regulation of cell proliferation. Dig Liver Dis 2004; 36 Suppl 1:S2-7. [PMID: 15077905 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2003.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Somatostatin is an inhibitory neuropeptide, which acts on various targets throughout the body to regulate a variety of physiological functions including inhibition of endocrine and exocrine secretions, modulation of neurotransmission, motor and cognitive functions, inhibition of intestinal motility, absorption of nutrients and ions, vascular contractility and inhibition of normal and tumour cell proliferation. It exerts its effects through interaction with five somatostatin receptors (sst1-sst5), which belong to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors with seven transmembrane spanning domains and are variably expressed in a variety of tumours such as gastroenteropancreatic tumours, pituitary tumours, and carcinoid tumours. This review covers the present knowledge regarding the molecular mechanisms involved in somatostatin antineoplastic activity. Evidence that sst2 receptor acts as a tumour suppressor is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Bousquet
- INSERM U531, IFR 31, CHU Rangueil, 31403 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
The field of cancer gene therapy is in continuous expansion, and technology is quickly moving ahead as far as gene targeting and regulation of gene expression are concerned. This review focuses on the endocrine aspects of gene therapy, including the possibility to exploit hormone and hormone receptor functions for regulating therapeutic gene expression, the use of endocrine-specific genes as new therapeutic tools, the effects of viral vector delivery and transgene expression on the endocrine system, and the endocrine response to viral vector delivery. Present ethical concerns of gene therapy and the risk of germ cell transduction are also discussed, along with potential lines of innovation to improve cell and gene targeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa Barzon
- Department of Histology, Microbiology, and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Padova, I-35121 Padua, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
The presence of cellular somatostatin receptors, particularly of subtype 2, has been reported in a large number of human primary non-neuroendocrine tumours, such as breast and colon cancer. Our aim was to evaluate whether subtype 2 expression may represent a prognostic factor in these tumours, and if the exact determination of its expression might help to identify patients eligible for a new treatment modality based on somatostatin analogues. Large groups of neuroblastomas as well as breast and colon cancers were studied for subtype 2 expression. In the two latter groups the expression of subtype 2 was evaluated both in tumour and in the corresponding normal tissue from the same patient, to correctly evaluate any modification of subtype 2 mRNA expression in cancer. Subtype 2 mRNA expression was measured with accurate quantitative retro transcription-polymerase chain reaction procedures (first, by competitive polymerase chain reaction and then, by real-time assays). When possible, results of mRNA measurement were compared with in vitro (in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry) and in vivo (octreoscan) demonstration of subtype 2 expression in the same patients. Our results seem to suggest the hypothesis that subtype 2 may represent a marker of cell differentiation in certain tumours, such as neuroblastoma, and another instance may be represented by breast and colon cancer. Beside this, the question whether subtype 2 may have an active role in inhibiting cancer cell proliferation, stays open.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C Smitha
- Endocrinology Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|