1
|
Elliott RC, Smith DL, Echodu DC. Synergy and timing: a concurrent mass medical campaign predicted to augment indoor residual spraying for malaria. Malar J 2019; 18:160. [PMID: 31060554 PMCID: PMC6501353 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2788-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Control programmes for high burden countries are tasked with charting effective multi-year strategies for malaria control within significant resource constraints. Synergies between different control tools, in which more than additive benefit accrues from interventions used together, are of interest because they may be used to obtain savings or to maximize health impact per expenditure. One commonly used intervention in sub-Saharan Africa is indoor residual spraying (IRS), typically deployed through a mass campaign. While possible synergies between IRS and long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) have been investigated in multiple transmission settings, coordinated synergy between IRS and other mass medical distribution campaigns have not attracted much attention. Recently, a strong timing-dependent synergy between an IRS campaign and a mass drug administration (MDA) was theoretically quantified. These synergistic benefits likely differ across settings depending on transmission intensity and its overall seasonal pattern. Methods High coverage interventions are modelled in different transmission environments using two methods: a Ross–Macdonald model variant and openmalaria simulations. The impact of each intervention strategy was measured through its ability to prevent host infections over time, and the effects were compared to the baseline case of deploying interventions in isolation. Results By modelling IRS and MDA together and varying their deployment times, a strong synergy was found when the administered interventions overlapped. The added benefit of co-timed interventions was robust to differences in the models. In the Ross–Macdonald model, the impact compared was roughly double the sequential interventions in most transmission settings. Openmalaria simulations of this medical control augmentation of an IRS campaign show an even stronger response with the same timing relationship. Conclusions The strong synergies found for these control tools between the complementary interventions demonstrate a general feature of effective concurrent campaign-style vector and medical interventions. A mass treatment campaign is normally short-lived, especially in higher transmission settings. When co-timed, the rapid clearing of the host parasite reservoir via chemotherapy is protected from resurgence by the longer duration of the vector control. An effective synchronous treatment campaign has the potential to greatly augment the impact of indoor residual spraying. Mass screening and treatment (MSAT) with highly sensitive rapid diagnostic tests may demonstrate a comparable trend while mass LLIN campaigns may similarly coordinate with MDA/MSAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard C Elliott
- Micron School of Materials Science and Engineering, Boise State University, Engineering Building, Suite 338, Boise, ID, 83725, USA. .,Pilgrim Africa, 115 N 85th St #202, Seattle, WA, 98103, USA.
| | - David L Smith
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, 2301 Fifth Ave., Suite 600, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yakob L, Cameron M, Lines J. Combining indoor and outdoor methods for controlling malaria vectors: an ecological model of endectocide-treated livestock and insecticidal bed nets. Malar J 2017; 16:114. [PMID: 28288642 PMCID: PMC5347819 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1748-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2016] [Accepted: 02/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Malaria is spread by mosquitoes that are increasingly recognised to have diverse biting behaviours. How a mosquito in a specific environment responds to differing availability of blood-host species is largely unknown and yet critical to vector control efficacy. A parsimonious mathematical model is proposed that accounts for a diverse range of host-biting behaviours and assesses their impact on combining long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) with a novel approach to malaria control: livestock treated with insecticidal compounds (‘endectocides’) that kill biting mosquitoes. Results Simulations of a malaria control programme showed marked differences across biting ecologies in the efficacy of both LLINs as a stand-alone tool and the combination of LLINs with endectocide-treated cattle. During the intervals between LLIN mass campaigns, concordant use of endectocides is projected to reduce the bounce-back in malaria prevalence that can occur as LLIN efficacy decays over time, especially if replacement campaigns are delayed. Integrating these approaches can also dramatically improve the attainability of local elimination; endectocidal treatment schedules required to achieve this aim are provided for malaria vectors with different biting ecologies. Conclusions Targeting blood-feeding mosquitoes by treating livestock with endectocides offers a potentially useful complement to existing malaria control programmes centred on LLIN distribution. This approach is likely to be effective against vectors with a wide range of host-preferences and biting behaviours, with the exception of species that are so strictly anthropophilic that most blood meals are taken on humans even when humans are much less available than non-human hosts. Identifying this functional relationship in wild mosquito populations and ascertaining the extent to which it differs, within as well as between species, is a critical next step before targets can be set for employing this novel approach and combination. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-017-1748-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laith Yakob
- Department of Disease Control, The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
| | - Mary Cameron
- Department of Disease Control, The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Jo Lines
- Department of Disease Control, The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yakob L. How do biting disease vectors behaviourally respond to host availability? Parasit Vectors 2016; 9:468. [PMID: 27562086 PMCID: PMC5000478 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1762-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Accepted: 08/17/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ecological theory predicts a diverse range of functional responses of species to resource availability; but in the context of human blood consumption by disease vectors, a simplistic, linear response is ubiquitously assumed. A simple and flexible model formulation is presented that extends the Holling's Types to account for a wider range of qualitatively distinct behaviours, and used to examine the impact of different vector responses to the relative availability of multiple blood-host species. RESULTS Epidemiological models of falciparum malaria, Chagas disease and Lyme disease demonstrate that the standard, often implicit, assumption of a linear functional response can lead to spurious under- or over-estimates in disease transmission potential, across a full range of pathogen life-cycles. It is shown how the functional response in vector biting can augment disease intervention outcomes. Interactions between vector biting behaviour and uneven pathogen transmission probabilities between alternative hosts, as is the case for Chagas disease, can render infection more resilient to control. CONCLUSIONS Both the novel response formula and the nested vector-borne disease structure offer a flexible framework that can be applied to other vector-borne diseases in assessing the role of this newly identified aspect of biting behavioural ecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laith Yakob
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jit M, Hutubessy R. Methodological Challenges to Economic Evaluations of Vaccines: Is a Common Approach Still Possible? APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2016; 14:245-52. [PMID: 26832145 PMCID: PMC4871927 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-016-0224-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Economic evaluation of vaccination is a key tool to inform effective spending on vaccines. However, many evaluations have been criticised for failing to capture features of vaccines which are relevant to decision makers. These include broader societal benefits (such as improved educational achievement, economic growth and political stability), reduced health disparities, medical innovation, reduced hospital beds pressures, greater peace of mind and synergies in economic benefits with non-vaccine interventions. Also, the fiscal implications of vaccination programmes are not always made explicit. Alternative methodological frameworks have been proposed to better capture these benefits. However, any broadening of the methodology for economic evaluation must also involve evaluations of non-vaccine interventions, and hence may not always benefit vaccines given a fixed health-care budget. The scope of an economic evaluation must consider the budget from which vaccines are funded, and the decision-maker's stated aims for that spending to achieve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Jit
- Modelling and Economics Unit, Public Health England, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, NW9 6BT, UK.
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
| | - Raymond Hutubessy
- Initiative for Vaccine Research, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mignatti A, Boag B, Cattadori IM. Host immunity shapes the impact of climate changes on the dynamics of parasite infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113:2970-5. [PMID: 26884194 PMCID: PMC4801268 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1501193113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Global climate change is predicted to alter the distribution and dynamics of soil-transmitted helminth infections, and yet host immunity can also influence the impact of warming on host-parasite interactions and mitigate the long-term effects. We used time-series data from two helminth species of a natural herbivore and investigated the contribution of climate change and immunity on the long-term and seasonal dynamics of infection. We provide evidence that climate warming increases the availability of infective stages of both helminth species and the proportional increase in the intensity of infection for the helminth not regulated by immunity. In contrast, there is no significant long-term positive trend in the intensity for the immune-controlled helminth, as immunity reduces the net outcome of climate on parasite dynamics. Even so, hosts experienced higher infections of this helminth at an earlier age during critical months in the warmer years. Immunity can alleviate the expected long-term effect of climate on parasite infections but can also shift the seasonal peak of infection toward the younger individuals.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aging/immunology
- Animal Distribution
- Animals
- Global Warming
- Helminthiasis, Animal/epidemiology
- Helminthiasis, Animal/immunology
- Helminthiasis, Animal/parasitology
- Helminthiasis, Animal/transmission
- Host-Parasite Interactions/immunology
- Humidity
- Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic/epidemiology
- Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic/immunology
- Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic/parasitology
- Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic/veterinary
- Intestine, Small/immunology
- Intestine, Small/parasitology
- Larva/physiology
- Life Cycle Stages
- Ovum/physiology
- Population Dynamics
- Rabbits/immunology
- Rabbits/parasitology
- Scotland/epidemiology
- Seasons
- Soil/parasitology
- Stomach/immunology
- Stomach/parasitology
- Stomach Diseases/epidemiology
- Stomach Diseases/immunology
- Stomach Diseases/parasitology
- Stomach Diseases/veterinary
- Temperature
- Trichostrongyloidea/growth & development
- Trichostrongyloidea/physiology
- Trichostrongyloidiasis/epidemiology
- Trichostrongyloidiasis/immunology
- Trichostrongyloidiasis/parasitology
- Trichostrongyloidiasis/transmission
- Trichostrongyloidiasis/veterinary
- Trichostrongylosis/epidemiology
- Trichostrongylosis/immunology
- Trichostrongylosis/parasitology
- Trichostrongylosis/transmission
- Trichostrongylosis/veterinary
- Trichostrongylus/growth & development
- Trichostrongylus/physiology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Mignatti
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy; Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics and Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16082
| | - Brian Boag
- The James Hutton Institute, DD2 5DA Invergowrie, United Kingdom
| | - Isabella M Cattadori
- Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics and Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16082;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gonçalves D, Hunziker P. Transmission-blocking strategies: the roadmap from laboratory bench to the community. Malar J 2016; 15:95. [PMID: 26888537 PMCID: PMC4758146 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1163-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2015] [Accepted: 02/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Malaria remains one of the most prevalent tropical and infectious diseases in the world, with an estimated more than 200 million clinical cases every year. In recent years, the mosquito stages of the parasite life cycle have received renewed attention with some progress being made in the development of transmission-blocking strategies. From gametocytes to late ookinetes, some attractive antigenic targets have been found and tested in order to develop a transmission blocking vaccine, and drugs are being currently screened for gametocytocidal activity, and also some new and less conventional approaches are drawing increased attention, such as genetically modified and fungus-infected mosquitoes that become refractory to Plasmodium infection. In this review some of those strategies focusing on the progress made so far will be summarized, but also, the challenges that come from the translation of early promising benchwork resulting in successful applications in the field. To do this, the available literature will be screened and all the pieces of the puzzle must be combined: from molecular biology to epidemiologic and clinical data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Gonçalves
- CLINAM Foundation for Nanomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Patrick Hunziker
- CLINAM Foundation for Nanomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Miller E, Dushoff J, Huppert A. The risk of incomplete personal protection coverage in vector-borne disease. J R Soc Interface 2016; 13:20150666. [PMID: 26911486 PMCID: PMC4780561 DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2015] [Accepted: 02/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Personal protection (PP) techniques, such as insecticide-treated nets, repellents and medications, include some of the most important and commonest ways used today to protect individuals from vector-borne infectious diseases. In this study, we explore the possibility that a PP intervention with partial coverage may have the counterintuitive effect of increasing disease burden at the population level, by increasing the biting intensity on the unprotected portion of the population. To this end, we have developed a dynamic model which incorporates parameters that describe the potential effects of PP on vector searching and biting behaviour and calculated its basic reproductive rate, R0. R0 is a well-established threshold of disease risk; the higher R0 is above unity, the stronger the disease onset intensity. When R0 is below unity, the disease is typically unable to persist. The model analysis revealed that partial coverage with popular PP techniques can realistically lead to a substantial increase in the reproductive number. An increase in R0 implies an increase in disease burden and difficulties in eradication efforts within certain parameter regimes. Our findings therefore stress the importance of studying vector behavioural patterns in response to PP interventions for future mitigation of vector-borne diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ezer Miller
- The Biostatistics Unit, Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Tel Hashomer, Israel Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jonathan Dushoff
- Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit Huppert
- The Biostatistics Unit, Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Tel Hashomer, Israel Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brady OJ, Godfray HCJ, Tatem AJ, Gething PW, Cohen JM, McKenzie FE, Perkins TA, Reiner RC, Tusting LS, Sinka ME, Moyes CL, Eckhoff PA, Scott TW, Lindsay SW, Hay SI, Smith DL. Vectorial capacity and vector control: reconsidering sensitivity to parameters for malaria elimination. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2016; 110:107-17. [PMID: 26822603 PMCID: PMC4731004 DOI: 10.1093/trstmh/trv113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major gains have been made in reducing malaria transmission in many parts of the world, principally by scaling-up coverage with long-lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying. Historically, choice of vector control intervention has been largely guided by a parameter sensitivity analysis of George Macdonald's theory of vectorial capacity that suggested prioritizing methods that kill adult mosquitoes. While this advice has been highly successful for transmission suppression, there is a need to revisit these arguments as policymakers in certain areas consider which combinations of interventions are required to eliminate malaria. METHODS AND RESULTS Using analytical solutions to updated equations for vectorial capacity we build on previous work to show that, while adult killing methods can be highly effective under many circumstances, other vector control methods are frequently required to fill effective coverage gaps. These can arise due to pre-existing or developing mosquito physiological and behavioral refractoriness but also due to additive changes in the relative importance of different vector species for transmission. Furthermore, the optimal combination of interventions will depend on the operational constraints and costs associated with reaching high coverage levels with each intervention. CONCLUSIONS Reaching specific policy goals, such as elimination, in defined contexts requires increasingly non-generic advice from modelling. Our results emphasize the importance of measuring baseline epidemiology, intervention coverage, vector ecology and program operational constraints in predicting expected outcomes with different combinations of interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver J Brady
- The Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Andrew J Tatem
- Department of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK Fogarty International Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA Flowminder Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter W Gething
- Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - T Alex Perkins
- Fogarty International Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA Department of Biological Sciences & Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
| | - Robert C Reiner
- Fogarty International Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Lucy S Tusting
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Marianne E Sinka
- The Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Catherine L Moyes
- The Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Thomas W Scott
- Fogarty International Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Steven W Lindsay
- School of Biological & Biomedical Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK
| | - Simon I Hay
- The Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Fogarty International Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David L Smith
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Fogarty International Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Sanaria Institute for Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Walker AS, Lourenço J, Hill AVS, Gupta S. Modeling Combinations of Pre-erythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Vaccines. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2015; 93:1254-1259. [PMID: 26503278 PMCID: PMC4674243 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2014] [Accepted: 08/06/2015] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite substantial progress in the control of Plasmodium falciparum infection due to the widespread deployment of insecticide-treated bed nets and artemisinin combination therapies, malaria remains a prolific killer, with over half a million deaths estimated to have occurred in 2013 alone. Recent evidence of the development of resistance to treatments in both parasites and their mosquito vectors has underscored the need for a vaccine. Here, we use a mathematical model of the within-host dynamics of P. falciparum infection, fit to data from controlled human malaria infection clinical trials, to predict the efficacy of co-administering the two most promising subunit vaccines, RTS,S/AS01 and ChAd63-MVA ME-TRAP. We conclude that currently available technologies could be combined to induce very high levels of sterile efficacy, even in immune-naive individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew S. Walker
- *Address correspondence to Andrew S. Walker, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, United Kingdom. E-mail:
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mastering malaria: What helps and what hurts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015; 112:2925-6. [DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1501786112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|