Splice switching an oncogenic ratio of SmgGDS isoforms as a strategy to diminish malignancy

Tumor-suppressive activities for pogo transposable element derived with KRAB domain via ribosome biogenesis restriction

Transposable elements (TEs) are indispensable for human development, with critical functions in pluripotency and embryogenesis. TE sequences also contribute to human pathologies, especially cancer, with documented activities as cis/trans transcriptional regulators, as sources of non-coding RNAs, and as mutagens that disrupt tumor suppressors. Despite this knowledge, little is known regarding the involvement of TE-derived genes (TEGs) in tumor pathogenesis. Here, systematic analyses of TEG expression across human cancer reveal a prominent role for pogo TE derived with KRAB domain (POGK). We show that POGK acts as a tumor suppressor in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells and that it couples with the co-repressor TRIM28 to directly block the transcription of ribosomal genes RPS16 and RPS29, in turn causing widespread inhibition of ribosomal biogenesis. We report that POGK undergoes deactivation by isoform switching in clinical TNBC, altogether revealing its exapted activities in tumor growth control.

Protein isoform-centric therapeutics: expanding targets and increasing specificity

Most protein-coding genes produce multiple protein isoforms; however, these isoforms are commonly neglected in drug discovery. The expression of protein isoforms can be specific to a disease, tissue and/or developmental stage, and this specific expression can be harnessed to achieve greater drug specificity than pan-targeting of all gene products and to enable improved treatments for diseases caused by aberrant protein isoform production. In recent years, several protein isoform-centric therapeutics have been developed. Here, we collate these studies and clinical trials to highlight three distinct but overlapping modes of action for protein isoform-centric drugs: isoform switching, isoform introduction or depletion, and modulation of isoform activity. In addition, we discuss how protein isoforms can be used clinically as targets for cell type-specific drug delivery and immunotherapy, diagnostic biomarkers and sources of cancer neoantigens. Collectively, we emphasize the value of a focus on isoforms as a route to discovering drugs with greater specificity and fewer adverse effects. This approach could enable the targeting of proteins for which pan-inhibition of all isoforms is toxic and poorly tolerated.

The Many Roads from Alternative Splicing to Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms Involving Driver Genes

Cancer driver genes are either oncogenes or tumour suppressor genes that are classically activated or inactivated, respectively, by driver mutations. Alternative splicing-which produces various mature mRNAs and, eventually, protein variants from a single gene-may also result in driving neoplastic transformation because of the different and often opposed functions of the variants of driver genes. The present review analyses the different alternative splicing events that result in driving neoplastic transformation, with an emphasis on their molecular mechanisms. To do this, we collected a list of 568 gene drivers of cancer and revised the literature to select those involved in the alternative splicing of other genes as well as those in which its pre-mRNA is subject to alternative splicing, with the result, in both cases, of producing an oncogenic isoform. Thirty-one genes fall into the first category, which includes splicing factors and components of the spliceosome and splicing regulators. In the second category, namely that comprising driver genes in which alternative splicing produces the oncogenic isoform, 168 genes were found. Then, we grouped them according to the molecular mechanisms responsible for alternative splicing yielding oncogenic isoforms, namely, mutations in cis splicing-determining elements, other causes involving non-mutated cis elements, changes in splicing factors, and epigenetic and chromatin-related changes. The data given in the present review substantiate the idea that aberrant splicing may regulate the activation of proto-oncogenes or inactivation of tumour suppressor genes and details on the mechanisms involved are given for more than 40 driver genes.

Protein lipidation in cancer: mechanisms, dysregulation and emerging drug targets

Protein lipidation describes a diverse class of post-translational modifications (PTMs) that is regulated by over 40 enzymes, targeting more than 1,000 substrates at over 3,000 sites. Lipidated proteins include more than 150 oncoproteins, including mediators of cancer initiation, progression and immunity, receptor kinases, transcription factors, G protein-coupled receptors and extracellular signalling proteins. Lipidation regulates the physical interactions of its protein substrates with cell membranes, regulating protein signalling and trafficking, and has a key role in metabolism and immunity. Targeting protein lipidation, therefore, offers a unique approach to modulate otherwise undruggable oncoproteins; however, the full spectrum of opportunities to target the dysregulation of these PTMs in cancer remains to be explored. This is attributable in part to the technological challenges of identifying the targets and the roles of protein lipidation. The early stage of drug discovery for many enzymes in the pathway contrasts with efforts for drugging similarly common PTMs such as phosphorylation and acetylation, which are routinely studied and targeted in relevant cancer contexts. Here, we review recent advances in identifying targetable protein lipidation pathways in cancer, the current state-of-the-art in drug discovery, and the status of ongoing clinical trials, which have the potential to deliver novel oncology therapeutics targeting protein lipidation.

The role of alternative splicing in lung cancer

Aberrant alternative splicing (AS) events are frequently observed in lung cancer, which can be attributed to aberrant gene AS, alterations in splicing regulatory factors, or changes in splicing regulatory mechanisms. Consequently, the dysregulation of alternative RNA splicing is the fundamental cause of lung cancer. In this review, we have summarized the pivotal role of AS in the development, progression, invasion, metastasis, angiogenesis, and drug resistance of lung cancer. Ultimately, this review emphasizes the potential of AS as biomarkers in lung cancer prognosis and diagnosis, and introduces some applications of AS isoform in the treatment of lung cancer. The comprehension of the AS may provide a glimmer of hope for the eradication of lung cancer.

Regulation of protein prenylation

Prenyltransferases (PTases) are known to play a role in embryonic development, normal tissue homeostasis and cancer by posttranslationally modifying proteins involved in these processes. They are being discussed as potential drug targets in an increasing number of diseases, ranging from Alzheimer's disease to malaria. Protein prenylation and the development of specific PTase inhibitors (PTIs) have been subject to intense research in recent decades. Recently, the FDA approved lonafarnib, a specific farnesyltransferase inhibitor that acts directly on protein prenylation; and bempedoic acid, an ATP citrate lyase inhibitor that might alter intracellular isoprenoid composition, the relative concentrations of which can exert a decisive influence on protein prenylation. Both drugs represent the first approved agent in their respective substance class. Furthermore, an overwhelming number of processes and proteins that regulate protein prenylation have been identified over the years, many of which have been proposed as molecular targets for pharmacotherapy in their own right. However, certain aspects of protein prenylation, such as the regulation of PTase gene expression or the modulation of PTase activity by phosphorylation, have attracted less attention, despite their reported influence on tumor cell proliferation. Here, we want to summarize the advances regarding our understanding of the regulation of protein prenylation and the potential implications for drug development. Additionally, we want to suggest new lines of investigation that encompass the search for regulatory elements for PTases, especially at the genetic and epigenetic levels.

GTPase splice variants RAC1 and RAC1B display isoform-specific differences in localization, prenylation, and interaction with the chaperone protein SmgGDS

Identifying events that regulate the prenylation and localization of small GTPases will help define new strategies for therapeutic targeting of these proteins in disorders such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, and neurological deficits. Splice variants of the chaperone protein SmgGDS (encoded by RAP1GDS1) are known to regulate prenylation and trafficking of small GTPases. The SmgGDS-607 splice variant regulates prenylation by binding pre-prenylated small GTPases, but the effects of SmgGDS binding to the small GTPase RAC1 versus the splice variant RAC1B are not well defined. Here we report unexpected differences in the prenylation and localization of RAC1 and RAC1B, and their binding to SmgGDS. Compared to RAC1, RAC1B more stably associates with SmgGDS-607, is less prenylated, and accumulates more in the nucleus. We show that the small GTPase DIRAS1 inhibits binding of RAC1 and RAC1B to SmgGDS and reduces their prenylation. These results suggest that prenylation of RAC1 and RAC1B is facilitated by binding to SmgGDS-607, but the greater retention of RAC1B by SmgGDS-607 slows RAC1B prenylation. We show that inhibiting RAC1 prenylation by mutating the CAAX motif promotes RAC1 nuclear accumulation, suggesting that differences in prenylation contribute to the different nuclear localization of RAC1 versus RAC1B. Finally, we demonstrate RAC1 and RAC1B that cannot be prenylated bind GTP in cells, indicating that prenylation is not a prerequisite for activation. We report differential expression of RAC1 and RAC1B transcripts in tissues, consistent with these two splice variants having unique functions that might arise in part from their differences in prenylation and localization.

Structural and biophysical properties of farnesylated KRas interacting with the chaperone SmgGDS-558

KRas is a small GTPase and membrane-bound signaling protein. Newly synthesized KRas is post-translationally modified with a membrane-anchoring prenyl group. KRas chaperones are therapeutic targets in cancer due to their participation in trafficking oncogenic KRas to membranes. SmgGDS splice variants are chaperones for small GTPases with basic residues in their hypervariable domain (HVR), including KRas. SmgGDS-607 escorts pre-prenylated small GTPases, while SmgGDS-558 escorts prenylated small GTPases. We provide a structural description of farnesylated and fully processed KRas (KRas-FMe) in complex with SmgGDS-558 and define biophysical properties of this interaction. Surface plasmon resonance measurements on biomimetic model membranes quantified the thermodynamics of the interaction of SmgGDS with KRas, and small-angle x-ray scattering was used to characterize complexes of SmgGDS-558 and KRas-FMe structurally. Structural models were refined using Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations. Our results indicate that SmgGDS-558 interacts with the HVR and the farnesylated C-terminus of KRas-FMe, but not its G-domain. Therefore, SmgGDS-558 interacts differently with prenylated KRas than prenylated RhoA, whose G-domain was found in close contact with SmgGDS-558 in a recent crystal structure. Using immunoprecipitation assays, we show that SmgGDS-558 binds the GTP-bound, GDP-bound, and nucleotide-free forms of farnesylated and fully processed KRas in cells, consistent with SmgGDS-558 not engaging the G-domain of KRas. We found that the dissociation constant, Kd, for KRas-FMe binding to SmgGDS-558 is comparable with that for the KRas complex with PDEδ, a well-characterized KRas chaperone that also does not interact with the KRas G-domain. These results suggest that KRas interacts in similar ways with the two chaperones SmgGDS-558 and PDEδ. Therapeutic targeting of the SmgGDS-558/KRas complex might prove as useful as targeting the PDEδ/KRas complex in KRas-driven cancers.

Therapeutic Targeting of Alternative RNA Splicing in Gastrointestinal Malignancies and Other Cancers

Recent comprehensive genomic studies including single-cell RNA sequencing and characterization have revealed multiple processes by which protein-coding and noncoding RNA processing are dysregulated in many cancers. More specifically, the abnormal regulation of mRNA and precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) processing, which includes the removal of introns by splicing, is frequently altered in tumors, producing multiple different isoforms and diversifying protein expression. These alterations in RNA processing result in numerous cancer-specific mRNAs and pathogenically spliced events that generate altered levels of normal proteins or proteins with new functions, leading to the activation of oncogenes or the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. Abnormally spliced pre-mRNAs are also associated with resistance to cancer treatment, and certain cancers are highly sensitive to the pharmacological inhibition of splicing. The discovery of these alterations in RNA processing has not only provided new insights into cancer pathogenesis but identified novel therapeutic vulnerabilities and therapeutic opportunities in targeting these aberrations in various ways (e.g., small molecules, splice-switching oligonucleotides (SSOs), and protein therapies) to modulate alternative RNA splicing or other RNA processing and modification mechanisms. Some of these strategies are currently progressing toward clinical development or are already in clinical trials. Additionally, tumor-specific neoantigens produced from these pathogenically spliced events and other abnormal RNA processes provide a potentially extensive source of tumor-specific therapeutic antigens (TAs) for targeted cancer immunotherapy. Moreover, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms associated with aberrant RNA processes and the biological impact they play might provide insights into cancer initiation, progression, and metastasis. Our goal is to highlight key alternative RNA splicing and processing mechanisms and their roles in cancer pathophysiology as well as emerging therapeutic alternative splicing targets in cancer, particularly in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies.

K-Ras prenylation as a potential anticancer target

KRAS is one of the most commonly mutated oncogene and a negative predictive factor for a number of targeted therapies. Therefore, the development of targeting strategies against mutant KRAS is urgently needed. One potential strategy involves disruption of K-Ras membrane localization, which is necessary for its proper function. In this review, we summarize the current data about the importance of membrane-anchorage of K-Ras and provide a critical evaluation of this targeting paradigm focusing mainly on prenylation inhibition. Additionally, we performed a RAS mutation-specific analysis of prenylation-related drug sensitivity data from a publicly available database (https://depmap.org/repurposing/) of three classes of prenylation inhibitors: statins, N-bisphosphonates, and farnesyl-transferase inhibitors. We observed significant differences in sensitivity to N-bisphosphonates and farnesyl-transferase inhibitors depending on KRAS mutational status and tissue of origin. These observations emphasize the importance of factors affecting efficacy of prenylation inhibition, like distinct features of different KRAS mutations, tissue-specific mutational patterns, K-Ras turnover, and changes in regulation of prenylation process. Finally, we enlist the factors that might be responsible for the large discrepancy between the outcomes in preclinical and clinical studies including methodological pitfalls, the incomplete understanding of K-Ras protein turnover, and the variation of KRAS dependency in KRAS mutant tumors.

A Transcriptome-Wide Isoform Landscape of Melanocytic Nevi and Primary Melanomas Identifies Gene Isoforms Associated with Malignancy

Genetic splice variants have become of central interest in recent years, as they play an important role in different cancers. Little is known about splice variants in melanoma. Here, we analyzed a genome-wide transcriptomic dataset of benign melanocytic nevi and primary melanomas (n = 80) for the expression of specific splice variants. Using kallisto, a map for differentially expressed splice variants in melanoma vs. benign melanocytic nevi was generated. Among the top genes with differentially expressed splice variants were Ras-related in brain 6B (RAB6B), a member of the RAS family of GTPases, Macrophage Scavenger Receptor 1 (MSR1), Collagen Type XI Alpha 2 Chain (COLL11A2), and LY6/PLAUR Domain Containing 1 (LYPD1). The Gene Ontology terms of differentially expressed splice variants showed no enrichment for functional gene sets of melanoma vs. nevus lesions, but between type 1 (pigmentation type) and type 2 (immune response type) melanocytic lesions. A number of genes such as Checkpoint Kinase 1 (CHEK1) showed an association of mutational patterns and occurrence of splice variants in melanoma. Moreover, mutations in genes of the splicing machinery were common in both benign nevi and melanomas, suggesting a common mechanism starting early in melanoma development. Mutations in some of these genes of the splicing machinery, such as Serine and Arginine Rich Splicing Factor A3 and B3 (SF3A3, SF3B3), were significantly enriched in melanomas as compared to benign nevi. Taken together, a map of splice variants in melanoma is presented that shows a multitude of differentially expressed splice genes between benign nevi and primary melanomas. The underlying mechanisms may involve mutations in genes of the splicing machinery.

Splice-switching as cancer therapy

In light of recent advances in RNA splicing modulation as therapy for specific genetic diseases, there is great optimism that this approach can be applied to treatment of cancer as well. Dysregulation of alternative RNA splicing is a common aberration detected in many cancers and thus, provides an attractive target for therapeutics. Here, we present and compare two promising approaches that are currently being investigated to manipulate alternative splicing and their potential use in therapy. The first strategy makes use of splice-switching oligonucleotides, whereas the second strategy uses CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat Cas (CRISPR-associated) technology. We will discuss both the challenges and limitations of these technologies and progress being made to implement splice-switching as a potential cancer therapy.

A Not-So-Ancient Grease History: Click Chemistry and Protein Lipid Modifications

Protein lipid modification involves the attachment of hydrophobic groups to proteins via ester, thioester, amide, or thioether linkages. In this review, the specific click chemical reactions that have been employed to study protein lipid modification and their use for specific labeling applications are first described. This is followed by an introduction to the different types of protein lipid modifications that occur in biology. Next, the roles of click chemistry in elucidating specific biological features including the identification of lipid-modified proteins, studies of their regulation, and their role in diseases are presented. A description of the use of protein-lipid modifying enzymes for specific labeling applications including protein immobilization, fluorescent labeling, nanostructure assembly, and the construction of protein-drug conjugates is presented next. Concluding remarks and future directions are presented in the final section.

SmgGDS: An Emerging Master Regulator of Prenylation and Trafficking by Small GTPases in the Ras and Rho Families

Newly synthesized small GTPases in the Ras and Rho families are prenylated by cytosolic prenyltransferases and then escorted by chaperones to membranes, the nucleus, and other sites where the GTPases participate in a variety of signaling cascades. Understanding how prenylation and trafficking are regulated will help define new therapeutic strategies for cancer and other disorders involving abnormal signaling by these small GTPases. A growing body of evidence indicates that splice variants of SmgGDS (gene name RAP1GDS1) are major regulators of the prenylation, post-prenylation processing, and trafficking of Ras and Rho family members. SmgGDS-607 binds pre-prenylated small GTPases, while SmgGDS-558 binds prenylated small GTPases. This review discusses the history of SmgGDS research and explains our current understanding of how SmgGDS splice variants regulate the prenylation and trafficking of small GTPases. We discuss recent evidence that mutant forms of RabL3 and Rab22a control the release of small GTPases from SmgGDS, and review the inhibitory actions of DiRas1, which competitively blocks the binding of other small GTPases to SmgGDS. We conclude with a discussion of current strategies for therapeutic targeting of SmgGDS in cancer involving splice-switching oligonucleotides and peptide inhibitors.

The landscape and biological relevance of aberrant alternative splicing events in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Aberrant alternative splicing events (AASEs) are key biological processes for tumorigenesis and the rationale for designing splice-switching oligonucleotides (SSOs). However, the landscape of AASEs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear, which undermines the development of SSOs for ESCC. Here, we profiled AASEs based on 125 pairs of RNA-seq libraries. We identified 14,710 AASEs in ESCC, most of which (92.67%) affected coding genes. The first exon of transcripts was frequently changed in ESCC. We constructed a regulatory network where 74 RNA-binding proteins regulated 2142 AASEs. This network was enriched in apoptotic pathways and various adhesion/junction-related processes. Somatic mutations in ESCC regulating ASEs were mainly through trans-regulatory mode and were enriched in intron regions. Isoform switches of apoptotic genes and binding genes both tended to induce "noncoding transcripts" and "domain loss," disrupting the apoptotic and Hippo signaling pathways. All ESCC samples were grouped into three clusters with different AASEs patterns and the second cluster was identified as "cold tumor," with a low abundance of immune cells, activated immune pathways, and immunomodulators. Our work comprehensively profiled the landscape of AASEs in ESCC, revealed novel AASEs related to tumorigenesis and immune microenvironment, and suggested promising directions for designing SSOs for ESCC.

Silencing of SmgGDS, a Novel mTORC1 Inducer That Binds to RHEBs, Inhibits Malignant Mesothelioma Cell Proliferation

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an aggressive tumor that typically develops after a long latency following asbestos exposure. Although mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) activation enhances MM cell growth, the mTORC1 inhibitor everolimus has shown limited efficacy in clinical trials of MM patients. We explored the mechanism underlying mTORC1 activation in MM cells and its effects on cell proliferation and progression. Analysis of the expression profiles of 87 MMs from The Cancer Genome Atlas revealed that 40 samples (46%) displayed altered expression of RPTOR (mTORC1 component) and genes immediately upstream that activate mTORC1. Among them, we focused on RHEB and RHEBL1, which encode direct activators of mTORC1. Exogenous RHEBL1 expression enhanced MM cell growth, indicating that RHEB-mTORC1 signaling acts as a pro-oncogenic cascade. We investigated molecules that directly activate RHEBs, identifying SmgGDS as a novel RHEB-binding protein. SmgGDS knockdown reduced mTORC1 activation and inhibited the proliferation of MM cells with mTORC1 activation. Interestingly, SmgGDS displayed high binding affinity with inactive GDP-bound RHEBL1, and its knockdown reduced cytosolic RHEBL1 without affecting its activation. These findings suggest that SmgGDS retains GDP-bound RHEBs in the cytosol, whereas GTP-bound RHEBs are localized on intracellular membranes to promote mTORC1 activation. We revealed a novel role for SmgGDS in the RHEB-mTORC1 pathway and its potential as a therapeutic target in MM with aberrant mTORC1 activation. IMPLICATIONS: Our data showing that SmgGDS regulates RHEB localization to activate mTORC1 indicate that SmgGDS can be used as a new therapeutic target for MM exhibiting mTORC1 activation.

Deconvoluting the biology and druggability of protein lipidation using chemical proteomics

Lipids are indispensable cellular building blocks, and their post-translational attachment to proteins makes them important regulators of many biological processes. Dysfunction of protein lipidation is also implicated in many pathological states, yet its systematic analysis presents significant challenges. Thanks to innovations in chemical proteomics, lipidation can now be readily studied by metabolic tagging using functionalized lipid analogs, enabling global profiling of lipidated substrates using mass spectrometry. This has spearheaded the first deconvolution of their full scope in a range of contexts, from cells to pathogens and multicellular organisms. Protein N-myristoylation, S-acylation, and S-prenylation are the most well-studied lipid post-translational modifications because of their extensive contribution to the regulation of diverse cellular processes. In this review, we focus on recent advances in the study of these post-translational modifications, with an emphasis on how novel mass spectrometry methods have elucidated their roles in fundamental biological processes.

Neuronal Protein Farnesylation Regulates Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity and Cognitive Function

Protein prenylation is a post-translational lipid modification that governs a variety of important cellular signaling pathways, including those regulating synaptic functions and cognition in the nervous system. Two enzymes, farnesyltransferase (FT) and geranylgeranyltransferase type I (GGT), are essential for the prenylation process. Genetic reduction of FT or GGT ameliorates neuropathology but only FT haplodeficiency rescues cognitive function in transgenic mice of Alzheimer's disease. A follow-up study showed that systemic or forebrain neuron-specific deficiency of GGT leads to synaptic and cognitive deficits under physiological conditions. Whether FT plays different roles in shaping neuronal functions and cognition remains elusive. This study shows that in contrast to the detrimental effects of GGT reduction, systemic haplodeficiency of FT has little to no impact on hippocampal synaptic plasticity and cognition. However, forebrain neuron-specific FT deletion also leads to reduced synaptic plasticity, memory retention, and hippocampal dendritic spine density. Furthermore, a novel prenylomic analysis identifies distinct pools of prenylated proteins that are affected in the brain of forebrain neuron-specific FT and GGT knockout mice, respectively. Taken together, this study uncovers that physiological levels of FT and GGT in neurons are essential for normal synaptic/cognitive functions and that the prenylation status of specific signaling molecules regulates neuronal functions.

Combined Proteomic and Genetic Interaction Mapping Reveals New RAS Effector Pathways and Susceptibilities

Activating mutations in RAS GTPases drive many cancers, but limited understanding of less-studied RAS interactors, and of the specific roles of different RAS interactor paralogs, continues to limit target discovery. We developed a multistage discovery and screening process to systematically identify genes conferring RAS-related susceptibilities in lung adenocarcinoma. Using affinity purification mass spectrometry, we generated a protein-protein interaction map of RAS interactors and pathway components containing hundreds of interactions. From this network, we constructed a CRISPR dual knockout library targeting 119 RAS-related genes that we screened for KRAS-dependent genetic interactions (GI). This approach identified new RAS effectors, including the adhesion controller RADIL and the endocytosis regulator RIN1, and >250 synthetic lethal GIs, including a potent KRAS-dependent interaction between RAP1GDS1 and RHOA. Many GIs link specific paralogs within and between gene families. These findings illustrate the power of multiomic approaches to uncover synthetic lethal combinations specific for hitherto untreatable cancer genotypes. SIGNIFICANCE: We establish a deep network of protein-protein and genetic interactions in the RAS pathway. Many interactions validated here demonstrate important specificities and redundancies among paralogous RAS regulators and effectors. By comparing synthetic lethal interactions across KRAS-dependent and KRAS-independent cell lines, we identify several new combination therapy targets for RAS-driven cancers.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1775.