1
|
Kuai L, Parazoo NC, Shi M, Miller CE, Baker I, Bloom AA, Bowman K, Lee M, Zeng Z, Commane R, Montzka SA, Berry J, Sweeney C, Miller JB, Yung YL. Quantifying Northern High Latitude Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) Using Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS). GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES 2022; 36:e2021GB007216. [PMID: 36590828 PMCID: PMC9787914 DOI: 10.1029/2021gb007216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The northern high latitude (NHL, 40°N to 90°N) is where the second peak region of gross primary productivity (GPP) other than the tropics. The summer NHL GPP is about 80% of the tropical peak, but both regions are still highly uncertain (Norton et al. 2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3069-2019). Carbonyl sulfide (OCS) provides an important proxy for photosynthetic carbon uptake. Here we optimize the OCS plant uptake fluxes across the NHL by fitting atmospheric concentration simulation with the GEOS-CHEM global transport model to the aircraft profiles acquired over Alaska during NASA's Carbon in Arctic Reservoirs Vulnerability Experiment (2012-2015). We use the empirical biome-specific linear relationship between OCS plant uptake flux and GPP to derive the six plant uptake OCS fluxes from different GPP data. Such GPP-based fluxes are used to drive the concentration simulations. We evaluate the simulations against the independent observations at two ground sites of Alaska. The optimized OCS fluxes suggest the NHL plant uptake OCS flux of -247 Gg S year-1, about 25% stronger than the ensemble mean of the six GPP-based OCS fluxes. GPP-based OCS fluxes systematically underestimate the peak growing season across the NHL, while a subset of models predict early start of season in Alaska, consistent with previous studies of net ecosystem exchange. The OCS optimized GPP of 34 PgC yr-1 for NHL is also about 25% more than the ensembles mean from six GPP data. Further work is needed to fully understand the environmental and biotic drivers and quantify their rate of photosynthetic carbon uptake in Arctic ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Le Kuai
- Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaCAUSA
| | | | - Mingjie Shi
- Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryRichlandWAUSA
| | - Charles E. Miller
- Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaCAUSA
| | - Ian Baker
- Colorado State UniversityFort CollinsCOUSA
| | - Anthony A. Bloom
- Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaCAUSA
| | - Kevin Bowman
- Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaCAUSA
| | - Meemong Lee
- Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaCAUSA
| | - Zhao‐Cheng Zeng
- University of California Los AngelesJIFRESSELos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Roisin Commane
- Lamont‐Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia UniversityPalisadesNYUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Yuk L. Yung
- Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaCAUSA
- California Institute of TechnologyPasadenaCAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sun W, Berry JA, Yakir D, Seibt U. Leaf relative uptake of carbonyl sulfide to CO 2 seen through the lens of stomatal conductance-photosynthesis coupling. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2022; 235:1729-1742. [PMID: 35478172 DOI: 10.1111/nph.18178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Carbonyl sulfide (COS) has emerged as a multi-scale tracer for terrestrial photosynthesis. To infer ecosystem-scale photosynthesis from COS fluxes often requires knowledge of leaf relative uptake (LRU), the concentration-normalized ratio between leaf COS uptake and photosynthesis. However, current mechanistic understanding of LRU variability remains inadequate for deriving robust COS-based estimates of photosynthesis. We derive a set of closed-form equations to describe LRU responses to light, humidity and CO2 based on the Ball-Berry stomatal conductance model and the biochemical model of photosynthesis. This framework reproduces observed LRU responses: decreasing LRU with increasing light or decreasing humidity; it also predicts that LRU increases with ambient CO2 . By fitting the LRU equations to flux measurements on a C3 reed (Typha latifolia), we obtain physiological parameters that control LRU variability, including an estimate of the Ball-Berry slope of 7.1 without using transpiration measurements. Sensitivity tests reveal that LRU is more sensitive to photosynthetic capacity than to the Ball-Berry slope, indicating stomatal response to photosynthesis. This study presents a simple framework for interpreting observed LRU variability and upscaling LRU. The stoma-regulated LRU response to CO2 suggests that COS may offer a unique window into long-term stomatal acclimation to elevated CO2 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wu Sun
- Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, 260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Joseph A Berry
- Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, 260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Dan Yakir
- Earth and Planetary Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100, Israel
| | - Ulli Seibt
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, 520 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1565, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Western LM, Redington AL, Manning AJ, Trudinger CM, Hu L, Henne S, Fang X, Kuijpers LJM, Theodoridi C, Godwin DS, Arduini J, Dunse B, Engel A, Fraser PJ, Harth CM, Krummel PB, Maione M, Mühle J, O’Doherty S, Park H, Park S, Reimann S, Salameh PK, Say D, Schmidt R, Schuck T, Siso C, Stanley KM, Vimont I, Vollmer MK, Young D, Prinn RG, Weiss RF, Montzka SA, Rigby M. A renewed rise in global HCFC-141b emissions between 2017-2021. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 2022; 22:9601-9616. [PMID: 39315358 PMCID: PMC11417968 DOI: 10.5194/acp-22-9601-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
Global emissions of the ozone-depleting gas HCFC-141b (1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane, CH3CCl2F) derived from measurements of atmospheric mole fractions increased between 2017 and 2021 despite a fall in reported production and consumption of HCFC-141b for dispersive uses. HCFC-141b is a controlled substance under the Montreal Protocol, and its phase-out is currently underway, after a peak in reported consumption and production in developing (Article 5) countries in 2013. If reported production and consumption are correct, our study suggests that the 2017-2021 rise is due to an increase in emissions from the bank when appliances containing HCFC-141b reach the end of their life, or from production of HCFC-141b not reported for dispersive uses. Regional emissions have been estimated between 2017-2020 for all regions where measurements have sufficient sensitivity to emissions. This includes the regions of northwestern Europe, east Asia, the United States and Australia, where emissions decreased by a total of 2.3 ± 4.6 Ggyr-1, compared to a mean global increase of 3.0 ± 1.2 Ggyr-1 over the same period. Collectively these regions only account for around 30% of global emissions in 2020. We are not able to pinpoint the source regions or specific activities responsible for the recent global emission rise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke M. Western
- Global Monitoring Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO, USA
- School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - Cathy M. Trudinger
- Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lei Hu
- Global Monitoring Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO, USA
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Stephan Henne
- Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland
| | - Xuekun Fang
- College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | | | | | - David S. Godwin
- Stratospheric Protection Division, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jgor Arduini
- Department of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Urbino, Urbino, Italy
| | - Bronwyn Dunse
- Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andreas Engel
- Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Science, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Paul J. Fraser
- Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christina M. Harth
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Paul B. Krummel
- Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michela Maione
- Department of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Urbino, Urbino, Italy
| | - Jens Mühle
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Hyeri Park
- Department of Oceanography, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Sunyoung Park
- Department of Oceanography, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Stefan Reimann
- Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland
| | - Peter K. Salameh
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Say
- School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Roland Schmidt
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Tanja Schuck
- Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Science, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Carolina Siso
- Global Monitoring Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO, USA
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Kieran M. Stanley
- Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Science, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Isaac Vimont
- Global Monitoring Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO, USA
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Martin K. Vollmer
- Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland
| | - Dickon Young
- School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ronald G. Prinn
- Center for Global Change Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Ray F. Weiss
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Stephen A. Montzka
- Global Monitoring Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Matthew Rigby
- School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Light and Water Conditions Co-Regulated Stomata and Leaf Relative Uptake Rate (LRU) during Photosynthesis and COS Assimilation: A Meta-Analysis. SUSTAINABILITY 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/su14052840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
As a trace gas involved in hydration during plant photosynthesis, carbonyl sulfide (COS) and its leaf relative uptake rate (LRU) is used to reduce the uncertainties in simulations of gross primary productivity (GPP). In this study, 101 independent observations were collected from 22 studies. We extracted the LRU, stomatal conductance (gs), canopy COS and carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes, and relevant environmental conditions (i.e., light, temperature, and humidity), as well as the atmospheric COS and CO2 concentrations (Ca,COS and Ca,CO2). Although no evidence was found showing that gs regulates LRU, they responded in opposite ways to diurnal variations of environmental conditions in both mixed forests (LRU: Hedges’d = −0.901, LnRR = −0.189; gs: Hedges’d = 0.785, LnRR = 0.739) and croplands dominated by C3 plants (Hedges’d = −0.491, LnRR = −0.371; gs: Hedges’d = 1.066, LnRR = 0.322). In this process, the stomata play an important role in COS assimilation (R2 = 0.340, p = 0.020) and further influence the interrelationship of COS and CO2 fluxes (R2 = 0.650, p = 0.000). Slight increases in light intensity (R2 = 1, p = 0.002) and atmospheric drought (R2 = 0.885, p = 0.005) also decreased the LRU. The LRU saturation points of Ca,COS and Ca,CO2 were observed when ΔCa,COS ≈ 13 ppt (R2 = 0.580, p = 0.050) or ΔCa,CO2 ≈ −18 ppm (R2 = 0.970, p = 0.003). This study concluded that during plant photosynthesis and COS assimilation, light and water conditions co-regulated the stomata and LRU.
Collapse
|