ATP-induced conformational changes in the restriction endonuclease from Escherichia coli K-12

Phasevarions of Bacterial Pathogens: Methylomics Sheds New Light on Old Enemies

A wide variety of bacterial pathogens express phase-variable DNA methyltransferases that control expression of multiple genes via epigenetic mechanisms. These randomly switching regulons - phasevarions - regulate genes involved in pathogenesis, host adaptation, and antibiotic resistance. Individual phase-variable genes can be identified in silico as they contain easily recognized features such as simple sequence repeats (SSRs) or inverted repeats (IRs) that mediate the random switching of expression. Conversely, phasevarion-controlled genes do not contain any easily identifiable features. The study of DNA methyltransferase specificity using Single-Molecule, Real-Time (SMRT) sequencing and methylome analysis has rapidly advanced the analysis of phasevarions by allowing methylomics to be combined with whole-transcriptome/proteome analysis to comprehensively characterize these systems in a number of important bacterial pathogens.

The helical domain of the EcoR124I motor subunit participates in ATPase activity and dsDNA translocation

Type I restriction-modification enzymes are multisubunit, multifunctional molecular machines that recognize specific DNA target sequences, and their multisubunit organization underlies their multifunctionality. EcoR124I is the archetype of Type I restriction-modification family IC and is composed of three subunit types: HsdS, HsdM, and HsdR. DNA cleavage and ATP-dependent DNA translocation activities are housed in the distinct domains of the endonuclease/motor subunit HsdR. Because the multiple functions are integrated in this large subunit of 1,038 residues, a large number of interdomain contacts might be expected. The crystal structure of EcoR124I HsdR reveals a surprisingly sparse number of contacts between helicase domain 2 and the C-terminal helical domain that is thought to be involved in assembly with HsdM. Only two potential hydrogen-bonding contacts are found in a very small contact region. In the present work, the relevance of these two potential hydrogen-bonding interactions for the multiple activities of EcoR124I is evaluated by analysing mutant enzymes using in vivo and in vitro experiments. Molecular dynamics simulations are employed to provide structural interpretation of the functional data. The results indicate that the helical C-terminal domain is involved in the DNA translocation, cleavage, and ATPase activities of HsdR, and a role in controlling those activities is suggested.

The role of the methyltransferase domain of bifunctional restriction enzyme RM.BpuSI in cleavage activity

Restriction enzyme (REase) RM.BpuSI can be described as a Type IIS/C/G REase for its cleavage site outside of the recognition sequence (Type IIS), bifunctional polypeptide possessing both methyltransferase (MTase) and endonuclease activities (Type IIC) and endonuclease activity stimulated by S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) (Type IIG). The stimulatory effect of SAM on cleavage activity presents a major paradox: a co-factor of the MTase activity that renders the substrate unsusceptible to cleavage enhances the cleavage activity. Here we show that the RM.BpuSI MTase activity modifies both cleavage substrate and product only when they are unmethylated. The MTase activity is, however, much lower than that of M1.BpuSI and is thought not to be the major MTase for host DNA protection. SAM and sinefungin (SIN) increase the Vmax of the RM.BpuSI cleavage activity with a proportional change in Km, suggesting the presence of an energetically more favorable pathway is taken. We further showed that RM.BpuSI undergoes substantial conformational changes in the presence of Ca(2+), SIN, cleavage substrate and/or product. Distinct conformers are inferred as the pre-cleavage/cleavage state (in the presence of Ca(2+), substrate or both) and MTase state (in the presence of SIN and substrate, SIN and product or product alone). Interestingly, RM.BpuSI adopts a unique conformation when only SIN is present. This SIN-bound state is inferred as a branch point for cleavage and MTase activity and an intermediate to an energetically favorable pathway for cleavage, probably through increasing the binding affinity of the substrate to the enzyme under cleavage conditions. Mutation of a SAM-binding residue resulted in altered conformational changes in the presence of substrate or Ca(2+) and eliminated cleavage activity. The present study underscores the role of the MTase domain as facilitator of efficient cleavage activity for RM.BpuSI.

Recycling of protein subunits during DNA translocation and cleavage by Type I restriction-modification enzymes

The Type I restriction-modification enzymes comprise three protein subunits; HsdS and HsdM that form a methyltransferase (MTase) and HsdR that associates with the MTase and catalyses Adenosine-5′-triphosphate (ATP)-dependent DNA translocation and cleavage. Here, we examine whether the MTase and HsdR components can ‘turnover’ in vitro, i.e. whether they can catalyse translocation and cleavage events on one DNA molecule, dissociate and then re-bind a second DNA molecule. Translocation termination by both EcoKI and EcoR124I leads to HsdR dissociation from linear DNA but not from circular DNA. Following DNA cleavage, the HsdR subunits appear unable to dissociate even though the DNA is linear, suggesting a tight interaction with the cleaved product. The MTases of EcoKI and EcoAI can dissociate from DNA following either translocation or cleavage and can initiate reactions on new DNA molecules as long as free HsdR molecules are available. In contrast, the MTase of EcoR124I does not turnover and additional cleavage of circular DNA is not observed by inclusion of RecBCD, a helicase–nuclease that degrades the linear DNA product resulting from Type I cleavage. Roles for Type I restriction endonuclease subunit dynamics in restriction alleviation in the cell are discussed.

An investigation of the structural requirements for ATP hydrolysis and DNA cleavage by the EcoKI Type I DNA restriction and modification enzyme

Type I DNA restriction/modification systems are oligomeric enzymes capable of switching between a methyltransferase function on hemimethylated host DNA and an endonuclease function on unmethylated foreign DNA. They have long been believed to not turnover as endonucleases with the enzyme becoming inactive after cleavage. Cleavage is preceded and followed by extensive ATP hydrolysis and DNA translocation. A role for dissociation of subunits to allow their reuse has been proposed for the EcoR124I enzyme. The EcoKI enzyme is a stable assembly in the absence of DNA, so recycling was thought impossible. Here, we demonstrate that EcoKI becomes unstable on long unmethylated DNA; reuse of the methyltransferase subunits is possible so that restriction proceeds until the restriction subunits have been depleted. We observed that RecBCD exonuclease halts restriction and does not assist recycling. We examined the DNA structure required to initiate ATP hydrolysis by EcoKI and find that a 21-bp duplex with single-stranded extensions of 12 bases on either side of the target sequence is sufficient to support hydrolysis. Lastly, we discuss whether turnover is an evolutionary requirement for restriction, show that the ATP hydrolysis is not deleterious to the host cell and discuss how foreign DNA occasionally becomes fully methylated by these systems.

The phasevarion: phase variation of type III DNA methyltransferases controls coordinated switching in multiple genes

In several host-adapted pathogens, phase variation has been found to occur in genes that encode methyltransferases associated with type III restriction-modification systems. It was recently shown that in the human pathogens Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis phase variation of a type III DNA methyltransferase, encoded by members of the mod gene family, regulates the expression of multiple genes. This novel genetic system has been termed the 'phasevarion' (phase-variable regulon). The wide distribution of phase-variable mod family genes indicates that this may be a common strategy used by host-adapted bacterial pathogens to randomly switch between distinct cell types.

Type I restriction endonucleases are true catalytic enzymes

Type I restriction endonucleases are intriguing, multifunctional complexes that restrict DNA randomly, at sites distant from the target sequence. Restriction at distant sites is facilitated by ATP hydrolysis-dependent, translocation of double-stranded DNA towards the stationary enzyme bound at the recognition sequence. Following restriction, the enzymes are thought to remain associated with the DNA at the target site, hydrolyzing copious amounts of ATP. As a result, for the past 35 years type I restriction endonucleases could only be loosely classified as enzymes since they functioned stoichiometrically relative to DNA. To further understand enzyme mechanism, a detailed analysis of DNA cleavage by the EcoR124I holoenzyme was done. We demonstrate for the first time that type I restriction endonucleases are not stoichiometric but are instead catalytic with respect to DNA. Further, the mechanism involves formation of a dimer of holoenzymes, with each monomer bound to a target sequence and, following cleavage, each dissociates in an intact form to bind and restrict subsequent DNA molecules. Therefore, type I restriction endonucleases, like their type II counterparts, are true enzymes. The conclusion that type I restriction enzymes are catalytic relative to DNA has important implications for the in vivo function of these previously enigmatic enzymes.

Atomic force microscopy of the EcoKI Type I DNA restriction enzyme bound to DNA shows enzyme dimerization and DNA looping

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) allows the study of single protein–DNA interactions such as those observed with the Type I Restriction–Modification systems. The mechanisms employed by these systems are complicated and understanding them has proved problematic. It has been known for years that these enzymes translocate DNA during the restriction reaction, but more recent AFM work suggested that the archetypal EcoKI protein went through an additional dimerization stage before the onset of translocation. The results presented here extend earlier findings confirming the dimerization. Dimerization is particularly common if the DNA molecule contains two EcoKI recognition sites. DNA loops with dimers at their apex form if the DNA is sufficiently long, and also form in the presence of ATPγS, a non-hydrolysable analogue of the ATP required for translocation, indicating that the looping is on the reaction pathway of the enzyme. Visualization of specific DNA loops in the protein–DNA constructs was achieved by improved sample preparation and analysis techniques. The reported dimerization and looping mechanism is unlikely to be exclusive to EcoKI, and offers greater insight into the detailed functioning of this and other higher order assemblies of proteins operating by bringing distant sites on DNA into close proximity via DNA looping.

HsdR subunit of the type I restriction-modification enzyme EcoR124I: biophysical characterisation and structural modelling

Type I restriction-modification (RM) systems are large, multifunctional enzymes composed of three different subunits. HsdS and HsdM form a complex in which HsdS recognizes the target DNA sequence, and HsdM carries out methylation of adenosine residues. The HsdR subunit, when associated with the HsdS-HsdM complex, translocates DNA in an ATP-dependent process and cleaves unmethylated DNA at a distance of several thousand base-pairs from the recognition site. The molecular mechanism by which these enzymes translocate the DNA is not fully understood, in part because of the absence of crystal structures. To date, crystal structures have been determined for the individual HsdS and HsdM subunits and models have been built for the HsdM-HsdS complex with the DNA. However, no structure is available for the HsdR subunit. In this work, the gene coding for the HsdR subunit of EcoR124I was re-sequenced, which showed that there was an error in the published sequence. This changed the position of the stop codon and altered the last 17 amino acid residues of the protein sequence. An improved purification procedure was developed to enable HsdR to be purified efficiently for biophysical and structural analysis. Analytical ultracentrifugation shows that HsdR is monomeric in solution, and the frictional ratio of 1.21 indicates that the subunit is globular and fairly compact. Small angle neutron-scattering of the HsdR subunit indicates a radius of gyration of 3.4 nm and a maximum dimension of 10 nm. We constructed a model of the HsdR using protein fold-recognition and homology modelling to model individual domains, and small-angle neutron scattering data as restraints to combine them into a single molecule. The model reveals an ellipsoidal shape of the enzymatic core comprising the N-terminal and central domains, and suggests conformational heterogeneity of the C-terminal region implicated in binding of HsdR to the HsdS-HsdM complex.

Alleviation of restriction by DNA condensation and non-specific DNA binding ligands

During conditions of cell stress, the type I restriction and modification enzymes of bacteria show reduced, but not zero, levels of restriction of unmethylated foreign DNA. In such conditions, chemically identical unmethylated recognition sequences also occur on the chromosome of the host but restriction alleviation prevents the enzymes from destroying the host DNA. How is this distinction between chemically identical DNA molecules achieved? For some, but not all, type I restriction enzymes, alleviation is partially due to proteolytic degradation of a subunit of the enzyme. We identify that the additional alleviation factor is attributable to the structural difference between foreign DNA entering the cell as a random coil and host DNA, which exists in a condensed nucleoid structure coated with many non-specific ligands. The type I restriction enzyme is able to destroy the 'naked' DNA using a complex reaction linked to DNA translocation, but this essential translocation process is inhibited by DNA condensation and the presence of non-specific ligands bound along the DNA.

Tracking EcoKI and DNA fifty years on: a golden story full of surprises

1953 was a historical year for biology, as it marked the birth of the DNA helix, but also a report by Bertani and Weigle on 'a barrier to infection' of bacteriophage lambda in its natural host, Escherichia coli K-12, that could be lifted by 'host-controlled variation' of the virus. This paper lay dormant till Nobel laureate Arber and PhD student Dussoix showed that the lambda DNA was rejected and degraded upon infection of different bacterial hosts, unless it carried host-specific modification of that DNA, thus laying the foundations for the phenomenon of restriction and modification (R-M). The restriction enzyme of E.coli K-12, EcoKI, was purified in 1968 and required S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) and ATP as cofactors. By the end of the decade there was substantial evidence for a chromosomal locus hsdK with three genes encoding restriction (R), modification (M) and specificity (S) subunits that assembled into a large complex of >400 kDa. The 1970s brought the message that EcoKI cut away from its DNA recognition target, to which site the enzyme remained bound while translocating the DNA past itself, with concomitant ATP hydrolysis and subsequent double-strand nicks. This translocation event created clearly visible DNA loops in the electron microscope. EcoKI became the archetypal Type I R-M enzyme with curious DNA translocating properties reminiscent of helicases, recognizing the bipartite asymmetric site AAC(N6)GTGC. Cloning of the hsdK locus in 1976 facilitated molecular understanding of this sophisticated R-M complex and in an elegant 'pas de deux' Murray and Dryden constructed the present model based on a large body of experimental data plus bioinformatics. This review celebrates the golden anniversary of EcoKI and ends with the exciting progress on the vital issue of restriction alleviation after DNA damage, also first reported in 1953, which involves intricate control of R subunit activity by the bacterial proteasome ClpXP, important results that will keep scientists on the EcoKI track for another 50 years to come.

Complex restriction enzymes: NTP-driven molecular motors

Survival is assuredly the prime directive for all living organisms either as individuals or as a species. One of the main challenges encountered by bacterial populations is the danger of bacteriophage attacks, since infection of a single bacterium may rapidly propagate, decimating the entire population. In order to protect themselves against this acute threat, bacteria have developed an array of defence mechanisms, which range from preventing the infection itself via interference with bacteriophage adsorption to the cell surface and prevention of phage DNA injection, to degradation of the injected phage DNA. This last defence mechanism is catalysed by the bacterial restriction-modification (R-M) systems, and in particular, by nucleoside 5'-triphosphate (NTP)-dependent restriction enzymes, e.g. type I and type III R-M systems or the modification-dependent endonucleases. Type I and type III restriction systems have dual properties. They may either act as methylases and protect the host's own DNA against restriction by methylating specific residues, or they catalyse ATP-dependent endonuclease activity so that invading foreign DNA lacking the host-specific methylation is degraded. These defence mechanism systems are further complemented by the presence of methylation-dependent, GTP-dependent endonucleases, that restricts specifically methylated DNA. Although all three types of endonucleases are structurally very different, they share a common functional mechanism. They recognise and bind to specific DNA sequences but do not cleave DNA within those target sites. They belong to the general class of DNA motor proteins, which use the free energy associated with nucleoside 5'-triphosphate hydrolysis to translocate DNA so that the subsequent DNA cleavage event occurs at a distance from the endonuclease recognition site. Moreover, DNA cleavage appears to be a random process triggered upon stalling of the DNA translocation process and requiring dimerisation of the bound endonucleases for a concerted break of both DNA strands. In this review, we present a detailed description and analysis of the functional mechanism of the three known NTP-dependent restriction systems: type I and type III restriction-modification enzymes, as well as the methylation-dependent McrBC endonuclease.

Translocation-independent dimerization of the EcoKI endonuclease visualized by atomic force microscopy

Bacterial type I restriction/modification systems are capable of performing multiple actions in response to the methylation pattern on their DNA recognition sequences. The enzymes making up these systems serve to protect the bacterial cells against viral infection by binding to their recognition sequences on the invading DNA and degrading it after extensive ATP-driven translocation. DNA cleavage has been thought to occur as the result of a collision between two translocating enzyme complexes. Using atomic force microscopy (AFM), we show here that EcoKI dimerizes rapidly when bound to a plasmid containing two recognition sites for the enzyme. Dimerization proceeds in the absence of ATP and is also seen with an EcoKI mutant (K477R) that is unable to translocate DNA. Only monomers are seen when the enzyme complex binds to a plasmid containing a single recognition site. Based on our results, we propose that the binding of EcoKI to specific DNA target sequences is accompanied by a conformational change that leads rapidly to dimerization. This event is followed by ATP-dependent translocation and cleavage of the DNA.

Type I restriction systems: sophisticated molecular machines (a legacy of Bertani and Weigle)

Restriction enzymes are well known as reagents widely used by molecular biologists for genetic manipulation and analysis, but these reagents represent only one class (type II) of a wider range of enzymes that recognize specific nucleotide sequences in DNA molecules and detect the provenance of the DNA on the basis of specific modifications to their target sequence. Type I restriction and modification (R-M) systems are complex; a single multifunctional enzyme can respond to the modification state of its target sequence with the alternative activities of modification or restriction. In the absence of DNA modification, a type I R-M enzyme behaves like a molecular motor, translocating vast stretches of DNA towards itself before eventually breaking the DNA molecule. These sophisticated enzymes are the focus of this review, which will emphasize those aspects that give insights into more general problems of molecular and microbial biology. Current molecular experiments explore target recognition, intramolecular communication, and enzyme activities, including DNA translocation. Type I R-M systems are notable for their ability to evolve new specificities, even in laboratory cultures. This observation raises the important question of how bacteria protect their chromosomes from destruction by newly acquired restriction specifities. Recent experiments demonstrate proteolytic mechanisms by which cells avoid DNA breakage by a type I R-M system whenever their chromosomal DNA acquires unmodified target sequences. Finally, the review will reflect the present impact of genomic sequences on a field that has previously derived information almost exclusively from the analysis of bacteria commonly studied in the laboratory.

DNA supercoiling during ATP-dependent DNA translocation by the type I restriction enzyme EcoAI

Type I restriction enzymes cleave DNA at non-specific sites far from their recognition sequence as a consequence of ATP-dependent DNA translocation past the enzyme. During this reaction, the enzyme remains bound to the recognition sequence and translocates DNA towards itself simultaneously from both directions, generating DNA loops, which appear to be supercoiled when visualised by electron microscopy. To further investigate the mechanism of DNA translocation by type I restriction enzymes, we have probed the reaction intermediates with DNA topoisomerases. A DNA cleavage-deficient mutant of EcoAI, which has normal DNA translocation and ATPase activities, was used in these DNA supercoiling assays. In the presence of eubacterial DNA topoisomerase I, which specifically removes negative supercoils, the EcoAI mutant introduced positive supercoils into relaxed plasmid DNA substrate in a reaction dependent on ATP hydrolysis. The same DNA supercoiling activity followed by DNA cleavage was observed with the wild-type EcoAI endonuclease. Positive supercoils were not seen when eubacterial DNA topoisomerase I was replaced by eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I, which removes both positive and negative supercoils. Furthermore, addition of eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I to the product of the supercoiling reaction resulted in its rapid relaxation. These results are consistent with a model in which EcoAI translocation along the helical path of closed circular DNA duplex simultaneously generates positive supercoils ahead and negative supercoils behind the moving complex in the contracting and expanding DNA loops, respectively. In addition, we show that the highly positively supercoiled DNA generated by the EcoAI mutant is cleaved by EcoAI wild-type endonuclease much more slowly than relaxed DNA. This suggests that the topological changes in the DNA substrate associated with DNA translocation by type I restriction enzymes do not appear to be the trigger for DNA cleavage.

Translocation and specific cleavage of bacteriophage T7 DNA in vivo by EcoKI

Infection of Escherichia coli containing the type I restriction enzyme EcoKI by bacteriophage T7 0.3 mutants leads to restriction during the late stages of genome entry and during DNA replication. Patterns of cleavage in vivo suggest that some cutting occurs near the midpoint of two recognition sites, consistent with the idea that EcoKI translocates DNA bidirectionally through itself and cuts when two enzyme molecules collide. Rapid ejection of a 0.3(+) T7 genome from a bacteriophage lambda particle results in degradation of the infecting DNA by EcoKI, showing that the normal T7 DNA translocation process delays restriction. A unique recognition site inserted at the genomic left end allows EcoKI to function as a molecular motor and to translocate the remaining 39 kilobases of T7 DNA into the cell.

On the structure and operation of type I DNA restriction enzymes

Type I DNA restriction enzymes are large, molecular machines possessing DNA methyltransferase, ATPase, DNA translocase and endonuclease activities. The ATPase, DNA translocase and endonuclease activities are specified by the restriction (R) subunit of the enzyme. We demonstrate that the R subunit of the Eco KI type I restriction enzyme comprises several different functional domains. An N-terminal domain contains an amino acid motif identical with that forming the catalytic site in simple restriction endonucleases, and changes within this motif lead to a loss of nuclease activity and abolish the restriction reaction. The central part of the R subunit contains amino acid sequences characteristic of DNA helicases. We demonstrate, using limited proteolysis of this subunit, that the helicase motifs are contained in two domains. Secondary structure prediction of these domains suggests a structure that is the same as the catalytic domains of DNA helicases of known structure. The C-terminal region of the R subunit can be removed by elastase treatment leaving a large fragment, stable in the presence of ATP, which can no longer bind to the other subunits of Eco KI suggesting that this domain is required for protein assembly. Considering these results and previous models of the methyltransferase part of these enzymes, a structural and operational model of a type I DNA restriction enzyme is presented.

Localization of a protein-DNA interface by random mutagenesis

The type I restriction and modification enzymes do not possess obvious DNA-binding motifs within their target recognition domains (TRDs) of 150-180 amino acids. To identify residues involved in DNA recognition, changes were made in the amino-TRD of EcoKI by random mutagenesis. Most of the 101 substitutions affecting 79 residues had no effect on the phenotype. Changes at only seven positions caused the loss of restriction and modification activities. The seven residues identified by mutation are not randomly distributed throughout the primary sequence of the TRD: five are within the interval between residues 80 and 110. Sequence analyses have led to the suggestion that the TRDs of type I restriction enzymes include a tertiary structure similar to the TRD of the HhaI methyltransferase, and to a model for a DNA-protein interface in EcoKI. In this model, the residues within the interval identified by the five mutations are close to the protein-DNA interface. Three additional residues close to the DNA in the model were changed; each substitution impaired both activities. Proteins from twelve mutants were purified: six from mutants with partial or wild-type activity and six from mutants lacking activity. There is a strong correlation between phenotype and DNA-binding affinity, as determined by fluorescence anisotropy.

Sequence-specific DNA binding by EcoKI, a type IA DNA restriction enzyme

The type I DNA restriction and modification enzymes of prokaryotes are multimeric enzymes that cleave unmethylated, foreign DNA in a complex process involving recognition of the methylation status of a DNA target sequence, extensive translocation of DNA in both directions towards the enzyme bound at the target sequence, ATP hydrolysis, which is believed to drive the translocation possibly via a helicase mechanism, and eventual endonucleolytic cleavage of the DNA. We have examined the DNA binding affinity and exonuclease III footprint of the EcoKI type IA restriction enzyme on oligonucleotide duplexes that either contain or lack the target sequence. The influence of the cofactors, S-adenosyl methionine and ATP, on binding to DNA of different methylation states has been assessed. EcoKI in the absence of ATP, with or without S-adenosyl methionine, binds tightly even to DNA lacking the target site and the exonuclease footprint is large, approximately 45 base-pairs. The protection is weaker on DNA lacking the target site. Partially assembled EcoKI lacking one or both of the subunits essential for DNA cleavage, is unable to bind tightly to DNA lacking the target site but can bind tightly to the recognition site. The addition of ATP to EcoKI, in the presence of AdoMet, allows tight binding only to the target site and the footprint shrinks to 30 base-pairs, almost identical to that of the modification enzyme which makes up the core of EcoKI. The same effect occurs when S-adenosyl homocysteine or sinefungin are substituted for S-adenosyl methionine, and ADP or ATPgammaS are substituted for ATP. It is proposed that the DNA binding surface of EcoKI comprises three regions: a "core" region which recognises the target sequence and which is present on the modification enzyme, and a region on each DNA cleavage subunit. The cleavage subunits make tight contacts to any DNA molecule in the absence of cofactors, but this contact is weakened in the presence of cofactors to allow the protein conformational changes required for DNA translocation when a target site is recognised by the core modification enzyme. This weakening of the interaction between the DNA cleavage subunits and the DNA could allow more access of exonuclease III to the DNA and account for the shorter footprint.

Selection of non-specific DNA cleavage sites by the type IC restriction endonuclease EcoR124I

The Type IC restriction endonuclease EcoR124I binds specifically to its recognition sequence but subsequently translocates non-specific DNA past the complex in an ATP-dependent mechanism. The enzyme thus has the potential to cleave DNA at loci distant from the recognition site. We have scrutinised the link between translocation and cleavage on linear and circular DNA substrates. On linear DNA carrying two recognition sites, the majority of cleavages at loci distant from the recognition site occurred between the two sites, regardless of the inter-site distance or relative orientations. On circular DNA carrying one site, distant cleavages occurred throughout the DNA but an equivalent linear molecule underwent considerably fewer cleavages at distant loci. These results agree with published models for DNA tracking. However, on every molecule investigated, discrete cleavage sites were also observed within +/-250 bp of the recognition sites. The localised cleavages were not confined to particular DNA sequences and were independent of DNA topology. We propose a model to account for both distant and localised cleavage events. The conformation of the DNA loop extruded during tracking may result in two DNA segments being held in proximity to the restriction moiety on the protein, one close to the EcoR124I site and another distant from the site: cleavage may occur in either segment. Alternatively, the cutting of DNA close to recognition sites may be the result of multiple nicks being generated in the expanding loop before any extensive translocation.

Repercussions of DNA tracking by the type IC restriction endonuclease EcoR124I on linear, circular and catenated substrates

Type I restriction endonucleases such as EcoR124I cleave DNA at undefined loci, distant from their recognition sequences, by a mechanism that involves the enzyme tracking along the DNA between recognition and cleavage sites. This mechanism was examined on plasmids that carried recognition sites for EcoR124I and recombination sites for resolvase, the latter to create DNA catenanes. Supercoiled substrates with either one or two restriction sites were linearized by EcoR124I at similar rates, although the two-site molecule underwent further cleavage more readily than the one-site DNA. The catenane from the plasmid with one EcoR124I site, carrying the site on the smaller of the two rings, was cleaved by EcoR124I exclusively in the small ring, and this underwent multiple cleavage akin to the two-site plasmid. Linear substrates derived from the plasmids were cleaved by EcoR124I at very slow rates. The communication between recognition and cleavage sites therefore cannot stem from random looping. Instead, it must follow the DNA contour between the sites. On a circular DNA, the translocation of non-specific DNA past the specifically bound protein should increase negative supercoiling in one domain and decrease it in the other. The ensuing topological barrier may be the trigger for DNA cleavage.

Restriction by EcoKI is enhanced by co-operative interactions between target sequences and is dependent on DEAD box motifs

One subunit of both type I and type III restriction and modification enzymes contains motifs characteristic of DEAD box proteins, which implies that these enzymes may be DNA helicases. This subunit is essential for restriction, but not modification. The current model for restriction by both types of enzyme postulates that DNA cutting is stimulated when two enzyme complexes bound to neighbouring target sequences meet as the consequence of ATP-dependent DNA translocation. For type I enzymes, this model is supported by in vitro experiments, but the predicted co-operative interactions between targets have not been detected by assays that monitor restriction in vivo. The experiments reported here clearly establish the required synergistic effect but, in contrast to earlier experiments, they use Escherichia coli K-12 strains deficient in the restriction alleviation function associated with the Rac prophage. In bacteria with elevated levels of EcoKI the co-operative interactions are obscured, consistent with co-operation between free enzyme and that bound at target sites. We have made changes in three of the motifs characteristic of DEAD box proteins, including motif III, which in RecG is implicated in the migration of Holliday junctions. Conservative changes in each of the three motifs impair restriction.

Tyrosine 27 of the specificity polypeptide of EcoKI can be UV crosslinked to a bromodeoxyuridine-substituted DNA target sequence

The specificity (S) subunit of the restriction enzyme EcoKI imparts specificity for the sequence AAC(N6)GTGC. Substitution of thymine with bromodeoxyuridine in a 25 bp DNA duplex containing this sequence stimulated UV light-induced covalent crosslinking to the S subunit. Crosslinking occurred only at the residue complementary to the first adenine in the AAC sequence, demonstrating a close contact between the major groove at this sequence and the S subunit. Peptide sequencing of a proteolytically-digested, crosslinked complex identified tyrosine 27 in the S subunit as the site of crosslinking. This is consistent with the role of the N-terminal domain of the S subunit in recognizing the AAC sequence. Tyrosine 27 is conserved in the S subunits of the three type I enzymes that share the sequence AA in the trinucleotide component of their target sequence. This suggests that tyrosine 27 may make a similar DNA contact in these other enzymes.

S-adenosyl methionine alters the DNA contacts of the EcoKI methyltransferase

The EcoKI methyltransferase methylates two adenines on opposite strands of its bipartite DNA recognition sequence AAC(N6)GTGC. The enzyme has a strong preference for hemimethylated DNA substrates, but the methylation state of the DNA does not influence its binding affinity. Methylation interference was used to compare the contacts made by the EcoKI methyltransferase with unmodified, hemimethylated or fully modified DNAs. Contacts were seen at or near the N7 position of guanine, in the major groove, for all of the guanines in the EcoKI recognition sequence, and at two guanines on the edge of the intervening spacer sequence. The presence of the cofactor and methyl donor S-adenosyl methionine had a striking effect on the interference pattern for unmodified DNA which could not be mimicked by the presence of the cofactor analogue S-adenosyl homocysteine. In contrast, S-adenosyl methionine had no effect on the interference patterns for either kind of hemimethylated DNA, or for fully modified DNA. Differences between the interference patterns for the unmodified DNA and any of the three forms of methylated DNA provide evidence that methylation of the target sequence influences the conformation of the protein-DNA interface, and illustrate the importance of S-adenosyl methionine in the distinction between unmodified and methylated DNA by the methyltransferase.

Conservation of motifs within the unusually variable polypeptide sequences of type I restriction and modification enzymes

Type I restriction enzymes comprise three subunits encoded by genes designated hsdR, hsdM, and hsdS; S confers sequence specificity. Three families of enzymes are known and within families, but not between, hsdM and hsdR are conserved. Consequently, interfamily comparisons of M and R sequences focus on regions of putative functional significance, while both inter- and intrafamily comparisons address the origin, nature and role of diversity of type I restriction systems. We have determined the sequence of the hsdR gene for EcoA, thus making available sequences of all three hsd genes of one representative from each family. The predicted R polypeptide sequences share conserved regions with one superfamily of putative helicases, so-called 'DEAD box' proteins; these conserved sequences may be associated with the ATP-dependent translocation of DNA that precedes restriction. We also present hsdM and hsdR sequences for EcoE, a member of the same family as EcoA. The sequences of the M and R genes of EcoA and EcoE are at least as divergent as typical genes from Escherichia coli and Salmonella, perhaps as the result of selection favouring diversity of restriction specificities combined with lateral transfer among different species.

Model for how type I restriction enzymes select cleavage sites in DNA

Under appropriate conditions, digestion of phage T7 DNA by the type I restriction enzyme EcoK produces an orderly progression of discrete DNA fragments. All details of the fragmentation pattern can be explained on the basis of the known properties of type I enzymes, together with two further assumptions: (i) in the ATP-stimulated translocation reaction, the enzyme bound at the recognition sequence translocates DNA toward itself from both directions simultaneously; and (ii) when translocation causes neighboring enzymes to meet, they cut the DNA between them. The kinetics of digestion at 37 degrees C indicates that the rate of translocation of DNA from each side of a bound enzyme is about 200 base pairs per second, and the cuts are completed within 15-25 sec of the time neighboring enzymes meet. The resulting DNA fragments each contain a single recognition site with an enzyme (or subunit) remaining bound to it. At high enzyme concentrations, such fragments can be further degraded, apparently by cooperation between the specifically bound and excess enzymes. This model is consistent with a substantial body of previous work on the nuclease activity of EcoB and EcoK, and it explains in a simple way how cleavage sites are selected.

Evidence for a repeating domain in type I restriction enzymes

The primary structures of the recognition subunit (hsdS) in type I restriction enzymes from three isolates of Escherichia coli were compared and aligned by use of amino acid physical properties. A repeating domain was found in each of the subunits suggesting a pseudo-dimeric structure. Secondary structure predictions delineated two helical regions in each domain which suggested that the recognition subunits may act in a fashion similar to that proposed for repressor and activator molecules; namely, interaction with double-stranded DNA through helices and in two successive major grooves on the same DNA side. One helical motif could provide the specific recognition site and the other, the restriction site.

The nucleotide sequence recognised by the Escherichia coli D type I restriction and modification enzyme

A type I restriction endonuclease from a new isolate of Escherichia coli (E. coli E166) has been purified and characterised. The enzyme, EcoD, has a recognition sequence similar in overall structure to the previously determined type I enzyme sequences, an exception being that it is degenerate. The sequence is 5'-T-T-A-N-N-N-N-N-N-N-G-T-C-Y-3' 3'-A-A-T-N-N-N-N-N-N-N-C-A-G-R-5' where Y is a pyrimidine, R is a purine and N can be any nucleotide. The enzyme methylates adenosyl residues in both strands of the DNA that are separated by ten base pairs, suggesting that the enzyme interacts with DNA along one face of the helix making contacts in two successive major grooves.

DNA electron microscopy

In recent years DNA electron microscopy has become a tool of increasing interest in the fields of molecular genetics and molecular and cell biology. Together with the development of in vitro recombination and DNA cloning, new electron microscope techniques have been developed with the aim of studying the structural and functional organization of genetic material. The most important methods are based on nucleic acid hybridizations: DNA-DNA hybridization (heteroduplex, D-loop), RNA-DNA hybridization (R-loop), or combinations of both (R-hybrid). They allow both qualitative and quantitative analysis of gene organization, position and extension of homology regions, and characterization of transcription. The reproducibility and resolution of these methods make it possible to map a specific DNA region within 50 to 100 nucleotides. Therefore they have become a prerequisite for determining regions of interest for subsequent nucleotide sequencing. Special methods have been developed also for the analysis of protein-DNA interaction: e.g., direct visualization of specific protein-DNA complexes (enzymes, regulatory proteins), and analysis of structures with higher complexity (chromatin, transcription complexes).

Structures and mechanisms of DNA restriction and modification enzymes

DNA restriction and modification enzymes are responsible for the hostspecific barriers to interstrain and interspecies transfer of genetic information that have been observed in a variety of bacterial cell types. Although the phenomenon of host specificity was initially observed in the early 1950s (Luria & Human, 1952; Bertani & Weigle, 1953), it was nearly a decade later that Arber and his colleagues accurately predicted the molecular basis of the phenomenon. Their experiments with bacteriophage λ demonstrated that a given host-specificity system imparts a specific modification to the viral DNA, and further, that restriction of DNA lacking the appropriate modification is s consquence of nucleolytic hydrolysis upon entry into the host cell (Arber & Dussoix, 1962; Dussoix & Arber, 1962; Arber, Hattman & Dussoix, 1963).

A novel bacteriophage defence mechanism: the anti-restriction protein

Bacteriophage T3 and T7 protect their DNA from restriction by producing, as the earliest detectable phage functions, anti-restriction proteins. Although the two phage proteins differ in their chromatographic and antigenic properties, they act by the same mechanism: the anti-restriction proteins inhibit E. coli K12 restriction endonuclease by direct interaction.