Nucleotide sequence of an unusual regionally expressed silkmoth chorion RNA: predicted primary and secondary structures of an architectural protein

LepChorionDB, a database of Lepidopteran chorion proteins and a set of tools useful for the identification of chorion proteins in Lepidopteran proteomes

Chorion proteins of Lepidoptera have a tripartite structure, which consists of a central domain and two, more variable, flanking arms. The central domain is highly conserved and it is used for the classification of chorion proteins into two major classes, A and B. Annotated and unreviewed Lepidopteran chorion protein sequences are available in various databases. A database, named LepChorionDB, was constructed by searching 5 different protein databases using class A and B central domain-specific profile Hidden Markov Models (pHMMs), developed in this work. A total of 413 Lepidopteran chorion proteins from 9 moths and 1 butterfly species were retrieved. These data were enriched and organised in order to populate LepChorionDB, the first relational database, available on the web, containing Lepidopteran chorion proteins grouped in A and B classes. LepChorionDB may provide insights in future functional and evolutionary studies of Lepidopteran chorion proteins and thus, it will be a useful tool for the Lepidopteran scientific community and Lepidopteran genome annotators, since it also provides access to the two pHMMs developed in this work, which may be used to discriminate A and B class chorion proteins. LepChorionDB is freely available at http://bioinformatics.biol.uoa.gr/LepChorionDB.

Heterochrony and the introduction of novel modes of morphogenesis during the evolution of moth choriogenesis

Choriogenesis in silkmoths (superfamily Bombycoidea) and in a sphingid moth (superfamily Sphingoidea) differ in major, but discrete, ways. In silkmoths, the predominant lamellar component assembles early in choriogenesis to form a thin framework. Subsequently, the lamellar framework is modified, first by expansion, and then by densification. Finally, ornate surface structures called aeropyle crowns form in some silkmoths, but they are absent in the species described here. In the sphingid, lamellar framework formation occurs throughout choriogenesis rather than largely during the early stages as in silkmoths. Lamellar densification occurs, but lamellar expansion and aeropyle crown formation do not. An evolutionary model is presented that accounts for the observed morphogenetic differences. Patterns of chorion protein synthesis in the sphingid differ from those in silkmoths in ways that are interpretable in light of the observed morphogenetic differences and the previously postulated functions of the proteins in silkmoths.

Evolutionary changes in the developmental expression of silkmoth chorion genes and their morphological consequences

Discrete changes in silkmoth choriogenesis have occurred during evolution, as exemplified in the present report in Antheraea polyphemus and Hyalophora cecropia. At the level of morphology, the chorion of A. polyphemus has surface structures, called aeropyle crowns, that are absent from H. cecropia. Aeropyle crowns form during the very late period of choriogenesis and consist of two substructures--lamellae and filler. Filler is present in H. cecropia in greatly reduced amounts. At the level of protein synthesis, overall similarities in the two species are maintained until the very late period of choriogenesis, when synthesis of aeropyle crown components is maximal. In H. cecropia, very late period-specific proteins are reduced in number and abundance. Several of these minor proteins are candidates for E1 and E2, the components of filler. E1 and E2 RNAs are about 35 times more abundant in A. polyphemus, despite very similar gene copy numbers and times of expression in the two species. These results support the hypothesis that evolutionary changes in chorion morphology have resulted from regulatory changes in the expression of chorion genes, either at the level of transcription or mRNA decay. The hypothesis that evolutionary changes in chorion morphology are based on terminal addition onto a preexisting developmental program is discussed.

Organization of regionally expressed silkmoth chorion genes

We described the organization of two silkmoth chorion genes, called E1 and E2, whose expression is largely restricted in time to the very late period of choriogenesis and in space to one of two major subpopulations of follicle cells. Using E1 and E2 clone cDNAs as probes, we showed that gene copy numbers per haploid genome remain constant throughout silkmoth development despite major changes in total DNA content per nucleus. Furthermore, gene copy numbers are the same in both cellular regions of the choriogenic follicle despite differences in nuclear size and levels of E gene expression. Southern analysis indicated between two and four copies each for E1 and E2 genes. Analysis of chromosomal clones showed that single copies of E1 and E2 are separated by about 7.5 kilobases and are transcribed from the same DNA strand. Two distinct pairs of cloned E1 and E2 genes were characterized. No other chorion genes were in their immediate vicinity.

Evolution of the silk moth chorion gene superfamily: gene families CA and CB

The nucleotide sequences of two developmentally early chorion cDNA clones from Bombyx mori define two distinct proline-rich chorion protein families, which we name CA and CB to indicate their homologies to the previously defined chorion protein families A and B, as well as the developmentally late and cysteine-rich HcA and HcB chorion families. Thus, the chorion gene superfamily has two symmetrical branches, each consisting of three families: the alpha branch (A, CA, HcA families) and the beta branch (B, CB, HcB families). The evolution of the superfamily is discussed.

Organization of regionally expressed silkmoth chorion genes

We described the organization of two silkmoth chorion genes, called E1 and E2, whose expression is largely restricted in time to the very late period of choriogenesis and in space to one of two major subpopulations of follicle cells. Using E1 and E2 clone cDNAs as probes, we showed that gene copy numbers per haploid genome remain constant throughout silkmoth development despite major changes in total DNA content per nucleus. Furthermore, gene copy numbers are the same in both cellular regions of the choriogenic follicle despite differences in nuclear size and levels of E gene expression. Southern analysis indicated between two and four copies each for E1 and E2 genes. Analysis of chromosomal clones showed that single copies of E1 and E2 are separated by about 7.5 kilobases and are transcribed from the same DNA strand. Two distinct pairs of cloned E1 and E2 genes were characterized. No other chorion genes were in their immediate vicinity.