Autogenous control of the S10 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli: genetic dissection of transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation

σ28-dependent small RNA regulation of flagella biosynthesis

Flagella are important for bacterial motility as well as for pathogenesis. Synthesis of these structures is energy intensive and, while extensive transcriptional regulation has been described, little is known about the posttranscriptional regulation. Small RNAs (sRNAs) are widespread posttranscriptional regulators, most base pairing with mRNAs to affect their stability and/or translation. Here, we describe four UTR-derived sRNAs (UhpU, MotR, FliX and FlgO) whose expression is controlled by the flagella sigma factor σ28 (fliA) in Escherichia coli. Interestingly, the four sRNAs have varied effects on flagellin protein levels, flagella number and cell motility. UhpU, corresponding to the 3´ UTR of a metabolic gene, likely has hundreds of targets including a transcriptional regulator at the top flagella regulatory cascade connecting metabolism and flagella synthesis. Unlike most sRNAs, MotR and FliX base pair within the coding sequences of target mRNAs and act on ribosomal protein mRNAs connecting ribosome production and flagella synthesis. The study shows how sRNA-mediated regulation can overlay a complex network enabling nuanced control of flagella synthesis.

Regulation of ribosomal protein genes: An ordered anarchy

Ribosomal protein genes are among the most highly expressed genes in most cell types. Their products are generally essential for ribosome synthesis, which is the cornerstone for cell growth and proliferation. Many cellular resources are dedicated to producing ribosomal proteins and thus this process needs to be regulated in ways that carefully balance the supply of nascent ribosomal proteins with the demand for new ribosomes. Ribosomal protein genes have classically been viewed as a uniform interconnected regulon regulated in eukaryotic cells by target of rapamycin and protein kinase A pathway in response to changes in growth conditions and/or cellular status. However, recent literature depicts a more complex picture in which the amount of ribosomal proteins produced varies between genes in response to two overlapping regulatory circuits. The first includes the classical general ribosome‐producing program and the second is a gene‐specific feature responsible for fine‐tuning the amount of ribosomal proteins produced from each individual ribosomal gene. Unlike the general pathway that is mainly controlled at the level of transcription and translation, this specific regulation of ribosomal protein genes is largely achieved through changes in pre‐mRNA splicing efficiency and mRNA stability. By combining general and specific regulation, the cell can coordinate ribosome production, while allowing functional specialization and diversity. Here we review the many ways ribosomal protein genes are regulated, with special focus on the emerging role of posttranscriptional regulatory events in fine‐tuning the expression of ribosomal protein genes and its role in controlling the potential variation in ribosome functions.

This article is categorized under:

Translation > Ribosome Biogenesis

Translation > Ribosome Structure/Function

Translation > Translation Regulation

Posttranscriptional Regulation of tnaA by Protein-RNA Interaction Mediated by Ribosomal Protein L4 in Escherichia coli

Some ribosomal proteins have extraribosomal functions in addition to ribosome translation function. The extraribosomal functions of several r-proteins control operon expression by binding to own-operon transcripts. Previously, we discovered a posttranscriptional, RNase E-dependent regulatory role for r-protein L4 in the stabilization of stress-responsive transcripts. Here, we found an additional extraribosomal function for L4 in regulating the tna operon by L4-intergenic spacer mRNA interactions. L4 binds to the transcribed spacer RNA between tnaC and tnaA and alters the structural conformation of the spacer RNA, thereby reducing the translation of TnaA. Our study establishes a previously unknown L4-mediated mechanism for regulating gene expression, suggesting that bacterial cells have multiple strategies for controlling levels of tryptophanase in response to varied cell growth conditions.

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein (r-protein) L4 has extraribosomal biological functions. Previously, we described L4 as inhibiting RNase E activity through protein-protein interactions. Here, we report that from stabilized transcripts regulated by L4-RNase E, mRNA levels of tnaA (encoding tryptophanase from the tnaCAB operon) increased upon ectopic L4 expression, whereas TnaA protein levels decreased. However, at nonpermissive temperatures (to inactivate RNase E), tnaA mRNA and protein levels both increased in an rne temperature-sensitive [rne(Ts)] mutant strain. Thus, L4 protein fine-tunes TnaA protein levels independently of its inhibition of RNase E. We demonstrate that ectopically expressed L4 binds with transcribed spacer RNA between tnaC and tnaA and downregulates TnaA translation. We found that deletion of the 5′ or 3′ half of the spacer compared to the wild type resulted in a similar reduction in TnaA translation in the presence of L4. In vitro binding of L4 to the tnaC-tnaA transcribed spacer RNA results in changes to its secondary structure. We reveal that during early stationary-phase bacterial growth, steady-state levels of tnaA mRNA increased but TnaA protein levels decreased. We further confirm that endogenous L4 binds to tnaC-tnaA transcribed spacer RNA in cells at early stationary phase. Our results reveal the novel function of L4 in fine-tuning TnaA protein levels during cell growth and demonstrate that r-protein L4 acts as a translation regulator outside the ribosome and its own operon.

IMPORTANCE Some ribosomal proteins have extraribosomal functions in addition to ribosome translation function. The extraribosomal functions of several r-proteins control operon expression by binding to own-operon transcripts. Previously, we discovered a posttranscriptional, RNase E-dependent regulatory role for r-protein L4 in the stabilization of stress-responsive transcripts. Here, we found an additional extraribosomal function for L4 in regulating the tna operon by L4-intergenic spacer mRNA interactions. L4 binds to the transcribed spacer RNA between tnaC and tnaA and alters the structural conformation of the spacer RNA, thereby reducing the translation of TnaA. Our study establishes a previously unknown L4-mediated mechanism for regulating gene expression, suggesting that bacterial cells have multiple strategies for controlling levels of tryptophanase in response to varied cell growth conditions.

Changes in protein patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli by silver nanoparticles capped with poly (4-styrenesulfonic acid-co-maleic acid) polymer

Background

While silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are increasingly attractive as an antibacterial agent in many applications, the effect of AgNPs on bacterial protein profiles, especially AgNPs stabilized by polymeric molecules, is not well understood.

Objectives

To investigate the changes in bacterial protein patterns by AgNPs capped with poly (4-styrenesulfonic acid-co-maleic acid) (AgNPs-PSSMA) polymer toward Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922.

Methods

The growth of bacteria after incubated with AgNPs-PSSMA for different time intervals was determined by optical density at 600 nm. Their protein patterns were observed using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and the proteomic analysis of extracted proteins was determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS).

Results

AgNPs-PSSMA was able to inhibit the growth of both S. aureus and E. coli cells. The treated bacterial cells expressed more proteins than the untreated cells as seen from SDS-PAGE study. Nanosilver (NS) caused the upregulation of metabolic gene, waaA, in S. aureus cells. For E. coli cells, the upregulated proteins were metabolic genes (srlB, fliE, murD) and other genes dealt with DNA replication (dinG), DNA–RNA transcription (yrdD), RNA– protein translation (rplD), molecular transport (sapF), and signal transduction (tdcF).

Conclusions

The antibacterial effect of AgNPs-PSSMA may arise by changing the bacterial proteins and thus interfering with the normal cell function.

Production of Protein-Complex Components Is Stoichiometric and Lacks General Feedback Regulation in Eukaryotes

Constituents of multiprotein complexes are required at well-defined levels relative to each other. However, it remains unknown whether eukaryotic cells typically produce precise amounts of subunits, or instead rely on degradation to mitigate imprecise production. Here, we quantified the production rates of multiprotein complexes in unicellular and multicellular eukaryotes using ribosome profiling. By resolving read-mapping ambiguities, which occur for a large fraction of ribosome footprints and distort quantitation accuracy in eukaryotes, we found that obligate components of multiprotein complexes are produced in proportion to their stoichiometry, indicating that their abundances are already precisely tuned at the synthesis level. By systematically interrogating the impact of gene dosage variations in budding yeast, we found a general lack of negative feedback regulation protecting the normally precise rates of subunit synthesis. These results reveal a core principle of proteome homeostasis and highlight the evolution toward quantitative control at every step in the central dogma.

Multidrug-resistant bacteria compensate for the epistasis between resistances

Mutations conferring resistance to antibiotics are typically costly in the absence of the drug, but bacteria can reduce this cost by acquiring compensatory mutations. Thus, the rate of acquisition of compensatory mutations and their effects are key for the maintenance and dissemination of antibiotic resistances. While compensation for single resistances has been extensively studied, compensatory evolution of multiresistant bacteria remains unexplored. Importantly, since resistance mutations often interact epistatically, compensation of multiresistant bacteria may significantly differ from that of single-resistant strains. We used experimental evolution, next-generation sequencing, in silico simulations, and genome editing to compare the compensatory process of a streptomycin and rifampicin double-resistant Escherichia coli with those of single-resistant clones. We demonstrate that low-fitness double-resistant bacteria compensate faster than single-resistant strains due to the acquisition of compensatory mutations with larger effects. Strikingly, we identified mutations that only compensate for double resistance, being neutral or deleterious in sensitive or single-resistant backgrounds. Moreover, we show that their beneficial effects strongly decrease or disappear in conditions where the epistatic interaction between resistance alleles is absent, demonstrating that these mutations compensate for the epistasis. In summary, our data indicate that epistatic interactions between antibiotic resistances, leading to large fitness costs, possibly open alternative paths for rapid compensatory evolution, thereby potentially stabilizing costly multiple resistances in bacterial populations.

Antibiotics target essential cellular functions, such as translation or cell wall biogenesis, and bacteria can become resistant to antibiotics by acquiring mutations in genes encoding those functions. This causes most drug-resistance mutations to be detrimental in the absence of the drug. However, bacteria can reduce this handicap by acquiring additional mutations, known as compensatory mutations. Compensatory evolution is crucial for the maintenance and dissemination of antibiotic resistances in bacterial populations. While compensation for single resistances has been extensively studied, compensatory evolution of multidrug-resistant bacteria remains unexplored. Importantly, interactions between resistance mutations are frequent, and this may cause compensation of multidrug-resistant bacteria to differ significantly from that of single-resistant strains. By comparing compensation of single- and double-drug–resistant E. coli, we found that double-drug–resistant bacteria compensate faster than single-drug–resistant strains. This is due to the acquisition of compensatory mutations with larger effects and possibly driven by the large fitness cost of double-drug resistance. Strikingly, we identified mutations that compensate specifically for the interaction between drug resistances, since they are beneficial only for double-drug–resistant bacteria and in conditions in which the interaction between resistances occurs. In summary, our data indicate that certain interactions between antibiotic-resistance mutations can open alternative paths for rapid compensatory evolution, thereby potentially stabilizing multiple drug resistances in bacterial populations.

Replication Initiation in Bacteria

The initiation of chromosomal DNA replication starts at a replication origin, which in bacteria is a discrete locus that contains DNA sequence motifs recognized by an initiator protein whose role is to assemble the replication fork machinery at this site. In bacteria with a single chromosome, DnaA is the initiator and is highly conserved in all bacteria. As an adenine nucleotide binding protein, DnaA bound to ATP is active in the assembly of a DnaA oligomer onto these sites. Other proteins modulate DnaA oligomerization via their interaction with the N-terminal region of DnaA. Following the DnaA-dependent unwinding of an AT-rich region within the replication origin, DnaA then mediates the binding of DnaB, the replicative DNA helicase, in a complex with DnaC to form an intermediate named the prepriming complex. In the formation of this intermediate, the helicase is loaded onto the unwound region within the replication origin. As DnaC bound to DnaB inhibits its activity as a DNA helicase, DnaC must dissociate to activate DnaB. Apparently, the interaction of DnaB with primase (DnaG) and primer formation leads to the release of DnaC from DnaB, which is coordinated with or followed by translocation of DnaB to the junction of the replication fork. There, DnaB is able to coordinate its activity as a DNA helicase with the cellular replicase, DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, which uses the primers made by primase for leading strand DNA synthesis.

Mutations in the bacterial ribosomal protein l3 and their association with antibiotic resistance

Different groups of antibiotics bind to the peptidyl transferase center (PTC) in the large subunit of the bacterial ribosome. Resistance to these groups of antibiotics has often been linked with mutations or methylations of the 23S rRNA. In recent years, there has been a rise in the number of studies where mutations have been found in the ribosomal protein L3 in bacterial strains resistant to PTC-targeting antibiotics but there is often no evidence that these mutations actually confer antibiotic resistance. In this study, a plasmid exchange system was used to replace plasmid-carried wild-type genes with mutated L3 genes in a chromosomal L3 deletion strain. In this way, the essential L3 gene is available for the bacteria while allowing replacement of the wild type with mutated L3 genes. This enables investigation of the effect of single mutations in Escherichia coli without a wild-type L3 background. Ten plasmid-carried mutated L3 genes were constructed, and their effect on growth and antibiotic susceptibility was investigated. Additionally, computational modeling of the impact of L3 mutations in E. coli was used to assess changes in 50S structure and antibiotic binding. All mutations are placed in the loops of L3 near the PTC. Growth data show that 9 of the 10 mutations were well accepted in E. coli, although some of them came with a fitness cost. Only one of the mutants exhibited reduced susceptibility to linezolid, while five exhibited reduced susceptibility to tiamulin.

S6:S18 ribosomal protein complex interacts with a structural motif present in its own mRNA

Prokaryotic ribosomal protein genes are typically grouped within highly conserved operons. In many cases, one or more of the encoded proteins not only bind to a specific site in the ribosomal RNA, but also to a motif localized within their own mRNA, and thereby regulate expression of the operon. In this study, we computationally predicted an RNA motif present in many bacterial phyla within the 5' untranslated region of operons encoding ribosomal proteins S6 and S18. We demonstrated that the S6:S18 complex binds to this motif, which we hereafter refer to as the S6:S18 complex-binding motif (S6S18CBM). This motif is a conserved CCG sequence presented in a bulge flanked by a stem and a hairpin structure. A similar structure containing a CCG trinucleotide forms the S6:S18 complex binding site in 16S ribosomal RNA. We have constructed a 3D structural model of a S6:S18 complex with S6S18CBM, which suggests that the CCG trinucleotide in a specific structural context may be specifically recognized by the S18 protein. This prediction was supported by site-directed mutagenesis of both RNA and protein components. These results provide a molecular basis for understanding protein-RNA recognition and suggest that the S6S18CBM is involved in an auto-regulatory mechanism.

A creature with a hundred waggly tails: intrinsically disordered proteins in the ribosome

Intrinsic disorder (i.e., lack of a unique 3-D structure) is a common phenomenon, and many biologically active proteins are disordered as a whole, or contain long disordered regions. These intrinsically disordered proteins/regions constitute a significant part of all proteomes, and their functional repertoire is complementary to functions of ordered proteins. In fact, intrinsic disorder represents an important driving force for many specific functions. An illustrative example of such disorder-centric functional class is RNA-binding proteins. In this study, we present the results of comprehensive bioinformatics analyses of the abundance and roles of intrinsic disorder in 3,411 ribosomal proteins from 32 species. We show that many ribosomal proteins are intrinsically disordered or hybrid proteins that contain ordered and disordered domains. Predicted globular domains of many ribosomal proteins contain noticeable regions of intrinsic disorder. We also show that disorder in ribosomal proteins has different characteristics compared to other proteins that interact with RNA and DNA including overall abundance, evolutionary conservation, and involvement in protein-protein interactions. Furthermore, intrinsic disorder is not only abundant in the ribosomal proteins, but we demonstrate that it is absolutely necessary for their various functions.

A creature with a hundred waggly tails: intrinsically disordered proteins in the ribosome

Intrinsic disorder (i.e., lack of a unique 3-D structure) is a common phenomenon, and many biologically active proteins are disordered as a whole, or contain long disordered regions. These intrinsically disordered proteins/regions constitute a significant part of all proteomes, and their functional repertoire is complementary to functions of ordered proteins. In fact, intrinsic disorder represents an important driving force for many specific functions. An illustrative example of such disorder-centric functional class is RNA-binding proteins. In this study, we present the results of comprehensive bioinformatics analyses of the abundance and roles of intrinsic disorder in 3,411 ribosomal proteins from 32 species. We show that many ribosomal proteins are intrinsically disordered or hybrid proteins that contain ordered and disordered domains. Predicted globular domains of many ribosomal proteins contain noticeable regions of intrinsic disorder. We also show that disorder in ribosomal proteins has different characteristics compared to other proteins that interact with RNA and DNA including overall abundance, evolutionary conservation, and involvement in protein–protein interactions. Furthermore, intrinsic disorder is not only abundant in the ribosomal proteins, but we demonstrate that it is absolutely necessary for their various functions.

Most RNAs regulating ribosomal protein biosynthesis in Escherichia coli are narrowly distributed to Gammaproteobacteria

In Escherichia coli, 12 distinct RNA structures within the transcripts encoding ribosomal proteins interact with specific ribosomal proteins to allow autogenous regulation of expression from large multi-gene operons, thus coordinating ribosomal protein biosynthesis across multiple operons. However, these RNA structures are typically not represented in the RNA Families Database or annotated in genomic sequences databases, and their phylogenetic distribution is largely unknown. To investigate the extent to which these RNA structures are conserved across eubacterial phyla, we created multiple sequence alignments representing 10 of these messenger RNA (mRNA) structures in E. coli. We find that while three RNA structures are widely distributed across many phyla of bacteria, seven of the RNAs are narrowly distributed to a few orders of Gammaproteobacteria. To experimentally validate our computational predictions, we biochemically confirmed dual L1-binding sites identified in many Firmicute species. This work reveals that RNA-based regulation of ribosomal protein biosynthesis is used in nearly all eubacterial phyla, but the specific RNA structures that regulate ribosomal protein biosynthesis in E. coli are narrowly distributed. These results highlight the limits of our knowledge regarding ribosomal protein biosynthesis regulation outside of E. coli, and the potential for alternative RNA structures responsible for regulating ribosomal proteins in other eubacteria.

Autoregulatory systems controlling translation factor expression: thermostat-like control of translational accuracy

In both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, the expression of a large number of genes is controlled by negative feedback, in some cases operating at the level of translation of the mRNA transcript. Of particular interest are those cases where the proteins concerned have cell-wide function in recognizing a particular codon or RNA sequence. Examples include the bacterial translation termination release factor RF2, initiation factor IF3, and eukaryote poly(A) binding protein. The regulatory loops that control their synthesis establish a negative feedback control mechanism based upon that protein's RNA sequence recognition function in translation (for example, stop codon recognition) without compromising the accurate recognition of that codon, or sequence during general, cell-wide translation. Here, the bacterial release factor RF2 and initiation factor IF3 negative feedback loops are reviewed and compared with similar negative feedback loops that regulate the levels of the eukaryote release factor, eRF1, established artificially by mutation. The control properties of such negative feedback loops are discussed as well as their evolution. The role of negative feedback to control translation factor expression is considered in the context of a growing body of evidence that both IF3 and RF2 can play a role in stimulating stalled ribosomes to abandon translation in response to amino acid starvation. Here, we make the case that negative feedback control serves primarily to limit the overexpression of these translation factors, preventing the loss of fitness resulting from an unregulated increase in the frequency of ribosome drop-off.

Regulation of ribonuclease E activity by the L4 ribosomal protein of Escherichia coli

Whereas ribosomal proteins (r-proteins) are known primarily as components of the translational machinery, certain of these r-proteins have been found to also have extraribosomal functions. Here we report the novel ability of an r-protein, L4, to regulate RNA degradation in Escherichia coli. We show by affinity purification, immunoprecipitation analysis, and E. coli two-hybrid screening that L4 interacts with a site outside of the catalytic domain of RNase E to regulate the endoribonucleolytic functions of the enzyme, thus inhibiting RNase E-specific cleavage in vitro, stabilizing mRNAs targeted by RNase E in vivo, and controlling plasmid DNA replication by stabilizing an antisense regulatory RNA normally attacked by RNase E. Broader effects of the L4-RNase E interaction on E. coli transcripts were shown by DNA microarray analysis, which revealed changes in the abundance of 65 mRNAs encoding the stress response proteins HslO, Lon, CstA, YjiY, and YaeL, as well as proteins involved in carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism and transport, transcription/translation, and DNA/RNA synthesis. Analysis of mRNA stability showed that the half lives of stress-responsive transcripts were increased by ectopic expression of L4, which normally increases along with other r-proteins in E. coli under stress conditions, and also by inactivation of RNase E. Our finding that L4 can inhibit RNase E-dependent decay may account at least in part for the elevated production of stress-induced proteins during bacterial adaptation to adverse environments.

The kgmB gene, encoding ribosomal RNA methylase from Streptomyces tenebrarius, is autogenously regulated

The KgmB methylase (the kanamycin-gentamicin resistance methylase from Streptomyces tenebrarius) acts at G-1405 of 16S rRNA within the sequence CGUCA that is also found 6 bp in front of ribosomal binding site of the kgmB gene. The kgmBColon, two colonslacZ gene and operon fusions were used in order to test for translational autoregulation of kgmB gene. Overexpression of kgmB either in cis or in trans drastically decreased the level of expression of the fusion protein. However, mutagenesis eliminated any role for the CGUCA sequence in translational autoregulation. Hence, the role of second putative regulatory sequence (CGCCC) that was shown to be involved in regulation of another methylase, Sgm (sisomicin-gentamicin methylase gene from Micromonospora zionensis) was examined. It was shown that the Sgm methylase can also decrease the level of expression of the kgmBColon, two colonslacZ fusion protein.

Regulation of ribosomal protein synthesis in Vibrio cholerae

We have investigated the regulation of the S10 and spc ribosomal protein (r-protein) operons in Vibrio cholerae. Both operons are under autogenous control; they are mediated by r-proteins L4 and S8, respectively. Our results suggest that Escherichia coli-like strategies for regulating r-protein synthesis extend beyond the enteric members of the gamma subdivision of proteobacteria.

Widespread selection for local RNA secondary structure in coding regions of bacterial genes

Redundancy of the genetic code dictates that a given protein can be encoded by a large collection of distinct mRNA species, potentially allowing mRNAs to simultaneously optimize desirable RNA structural features in addition to their protein-coding function. To determine whether natural mRNAs exhibit biases related to local RNA secondary structure, a new randomization procedure was developed, DicodonShuffle, which randomizes mRNA sequences while preserving the same encoded protein sequence, the same codon usage, and the same dinucleotide composition as the native message. Genes from 10 of 14 eubacterial species studied and one eukaryote, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, exhibited statistically significant biases in favor of local RNA structure as measured by folding free energy. Several significant associations suggest functional roles for mRNA structure, including stronger secondary structure bias in the coding regions of intron-containing yeast genes than in intronless genes, and significantly higher folding potential in polycistronic messages than in monocistronic messages in Escherichia coli. Potential secondary structure generally increased in genes from the 5' to the 3' end of E. coli operons, and secondary structure potential was conserved in homologous Salmonella typhi operons. These results are interpreted in terms of possible roles of RNA structures in RNA processing, regulation of mRNA stability, and translational control.

RNA-structural mimicry in Escherichia coli ribosomal protein L4-dependent regulation of the S10 operon

Ribosomal protein L4 regulates the 11-gene S10 operon in Escherichia coli by acting, in concert with transcription factor NusA, to cause premature transcription termination at a Rho-independent termination site in the leader sequence. This process presumably involves L4 interaction with the leader mRNA. Here, we report direct, specific, and independent binding of ribosomal protein L4 to the S10 mRNA leader in vitro. Most of the binding energy is contributed by a small hairpin structure within the leader region, but a 64-nucleotide sequence is required for the bona fide interaction. Binding to the S10 leader mRNA is competed by the 23 S rRNA L4 binding site. Although the secondary structures of the mRNA and rRNA binding sites appear different, phosphorothioate footprinting of the L4-RNA complexes reveals close structural similarity in three dimensions. Mutational analysis of the mRNA binding site is compatible with the structural model. In vitro binding of L4 induces structural changes of the S10 leader RNA, providing a first clue for how protein L4 may provoke transcription termination.

Ribosomal protein S15 represses its own translation via adaptation of an rRNA-like fold within its mRNA

The 16S rRNA-binding ribosomal protein S15 is a key component in the assembly of the small ribosomal subunit in bacteria. We have shown that S15 from the extreme thermophile Thermus thermophilus represses the translation of its own mRNA in vitro, by interacting with the leader segment of its mRNA. The S15 mRNA-binding site was characterized by footprinting experiments, deletion analysis and site-directed mutagenesis. S15 binding triggers a conformational rearrangement of its mRNA into a fold that mimics the conserved three-way junction of the S15 rRNA-binding site. This conformational change masks the ribosome entry site, as demonstrated by direct competition between the ribosomal subunit and S15 for mRNA binding. A comparison of the T.thermophilus and Escherichia coli regulation systems reveals that the two regulatory mRNA targets do not share any similarity and that the mechanisms of translational inhibition are different. Our results highlight an astonishing plasticity of mRNA in its ability to adapt to evolutionary constraints, that contrasts with the extreme conservation of the rRNA-binding site.

Comparative anatomy of a regulatory ribosomal protein

Ribosomal protein L4 is a crucial folding mediator and an important architectural component of the large ribosomal subunit. Furthermore, Escherichia coli L4 produced in excess of its rRNA binding sites downregulates the transcription and translation of its own S10 operon, encoding 11 ribosomal proteins. Genetic experiments and the crystal structure of Thermotoga maritima L4 had implicated separable regions on L4 in ribosome association and expression control while RNA competition experiments and the regulatory capacity of heterologous L4 had suggested an overlap of the protein sequences involved in the two functions. We report herein that contrary to other foreign bacterial L4 proteins, L4 from T. maritima only weakly controlled expression of the S10 operon in E. coli. Also, wildtype T. maritima L4 was more weakly associated with E. coli ribosomes than with the E. coli analog. Rational mutageneses were performed to try to increase the regulatory competence of T. maritima L4. The ribosome incorporation of the mutant proteins was also investigated. Two different deletions removing T. maritima-specific sequences had little effects on regulation although one did improve ribosome association. Interestingly, a set of multiple mutations, which rendered the region around helices alpha4 and alpha5 in T. maritima L4 more E. coli-like, had no influence on the incorporation of the protein into the large ribosomal subunit but considerably improved its regulatory potential. Therefore, the area around helices alpha4 and alpha5, which is critical for the initial folding steps of the large subunit, is also a central element of autogenous control, presumably by contacting the S10 mRNA leader. Ribosome association is compounded at later stages of assembly by additional rRNA contacts through L4 areas which do not participate in regulation. Similarly, sequences outside the alpha4/alpha5 region aid expression control.

Surprising flexibility of leader RNA determinants for r-protein L4-mediated transcription termination in the Escherichia coil S10 operon

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein L4 autogenously regulates transcription of the S10 operon, which encodes L4 and 10 other ribosomal proteins. Regulation results from L4-stimulated premature transcription termination at a U-rich site in the untranslated leader. The process requires transcription factor NusA. Here we report a detailed analysis of the RNA requirements for NusA-dependent, L4-mediated transcription control. We found that efficient regulation requires multiple features of the S10 leader, including two hairpins, called HD and upper HE, a connecting tether, and a U-rich sequence at the distal side of HE. As expected, regulation was optimal when all 7 Us were maintained in the U4CGU3 sequence at the termination site. However, despite the apparent specificity of L4 action on only the S10 operon, there is surprising flexibility at the primary sequence level for the HD-tether-HE region. Changes in the sequence of non-base-paired nucleotides flanking the HD hairpin or an A at the second position of the HD loop reduced L4 regulation, but other changes had little or no effect. Furthermore, generic hairpins from other RNAs could replace the natural HD and upper HE hairpins with little or no reduction of L4 control, suggesting that the secondary structure elements are also relatively generic. The lack of specific sequence requirements suggests that L4 may recognize multiple elements within this region of the nascent leader.

On the characterization of the putative S20-thx operon of Thermus thermophilus

A putative operon of the ribosomal proteins S20 and Thx has been determined in a 1.4 kb sequenced region of T. thermophilus genomic DNA. Both genes have a promoter sequence 29 nt upstream of ORF1, possess their own Shine-Dalgarno motifs (GGAG) and are separated by only 9 nucleotides, a feature characteristic of the compact Thermus thermophilus genome. This is a novel arrangement, since Thx is unique to the Thermus bacteria and in all other prokaryotes the S20 gene is monocistronic. Our results, in conjunction with the recent finding that Thx is located on the top of the head of the 30S subunit in a cavity between multiple RNA elements stabilizing them with its positive charge, corroborate the observation that thermophilic ribosomes require constituents with special features for their stabilization at high temperatures.

Genetic footprinting in bacteria

In vivo genetic footprinting was developed in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to simultaneously assess the importance of thousands of genes for the fitness of the cell under any growth condition. We have developed in vivo genetic footprinting for Escherichia coli, a model bacterium and pathogen. We further demonstrate the utility of this technology for rapidly discovering genes that affect the fitness of E. coli under a variety of growth conditions. The definitive features of this system include a conditionally regulated Tn10 transposase with relaxed sequence specificity and a conditionally regulated replicon for the vector containing the transposase and mini-Tn10 transposon with an outwardly oriented promoter. This system results in a high frequency of randomly distributed transposon insertions, eliminating the need for the selection of a population containing transposon insertions, stringent suppression of transposon mutagenesis, and few polar effects. Successful footprints have been achieved for most genes longer than 400 bp, including genes located in operons. In addition, the ability of recombinant proteins to complement mutagenized hosts has been evaluated by genetic footprinting using a bacteriophage lambda transposon delivery system.

Transcriptional and translational regulation of alpha-acetolactate decarboxylase of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis

The alpha-acetolactate decarboxylase (ALDC) gene, aldB, is the penultimate gene of the leu-ilv-ald operon, which encodes the three branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) biosynthesis genes in Lactococcus lactis. Its product plays a dual role in the cell: (i) it catalyzes the second step of the acetoin pathway, and (ii) it controls the pool of alpha-acetolactate during leucine and valine synthesis. It can be transcribed from the two promoters present upstream of the leu and ilv genes (P1 and P2) or independently under the control of its own promoter (P3). In this paper we show that the production of ALDC is limited by two mechanisms. First, the strength of P3 decreases greatly during starvation for BCAAs and under other conditions that generally provoke the stringent response. Second, although aldB is actively transcribed from P1 and P2 during BCAA starvation, ALDC is not significantly produced from these transcripts. The aldB ribosome binding site (RBS) appears to be entrapped in a stem-loop, which is itself part of a more complex RNA folding structure. The function of the structure was studied by mutagenesis, using translational fusions with luciferase genes to assess its activity. The presence of the single stem-loop entrapping the aldB RBS was responsible for a 100-fold decrease in the level of aldB translation. The presence of a supplementary secondary structure upstream of the stem-loop led to an additional fivefold decrease of aldB translation. Finally, the translation of the ilvA gene terminating in the latter structure decreased the level of translation of aldB fivefold more, leading to the complete extinction of the reporter gene activity. Since three leucines and one valine are present among the last six amino acids of the ilvA product, we propose that pausing of the ribosomes during translation could modulate the folding of the messenger, as a function of BCAA availability. The purpose of the structure-dependent regulation could be to ensure the minimal production of ALDC required for the control of the acetolactate pool during BCAA synthesis but to avoid its overproduction, which would dissipate acetolactate. Large amounts of ALDC, necessary for operation of the acetoin pathway, could be produced under favorable conditions from the P3 transcripts, which do not contain the secondary structures.

Expression of the gene for mitoribosomal protein S12 is controlled in human cells at the levels of transcription, RNA splicing, and translation

The human gene RPMS12 encodes a protein similar to bacterial ribosomal protein S12 and is proposed to represent the human mitochondrial orthologue. RPMS12 reporter gene expression in cultured human cells supports the idea that the gene product is mitochondrial and is localized to the inner membrane. Human cells contain at least four structurally distinct RPMS12 mRNAs that differ in their 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) as a result of alternate splicing and of 5' end heterogeneity. All of them encode the same polypeptide. The full 5'-UTR contains two types of sequence element implicated elsewhere in translational regulation as follows: a short upstream open reading frame and an oligopyrimidine tract similar to that found at the 5' end of mRNAs encoding other growth-regulated proteins, including those of cytosolic ribosomes. The fully spliced (short) mRNA is the predominant form in all cell types studied and is translationally down-regulated in cultured cells in response to serum starvation, even though it lacks both of the putative translational regulatory elements. By contrast, other splice variants containing one or both of these elements are not translationally regulated by growth status but are translated poorly in both growing and non-growing cells. Reporter analysis identified a 26-nucleotide tract of the 5'-UTR of the short mRNA that is essential for translational down-regulation in growth-inhibited cells. Such experiments also confirmed that the 5'-UTR of the longer mRNA variants contains negative regulatory elements for translation. Tissue representation of RPMS12 mRNA is highly variable, following a typical mitochondrial pattern, but the relative levels of the different splice variants are similar in different tissues. These findings indicate a complex, multilevel regulation of RPMS12 gene expression in response to signals mediating growth, tissue specialization, and probably metabolic needs.

Phylogenetic analysis of L4-mediated autogenous control of the S10 ribosomal protein operon

We investigated the regulation of the S10 ribosomal protein (r-protein) operon among members of the gamma subdivision of the proteobacteria, which includes Escherichia coli. In E. coli, this 11-gene operon is autogenously controlled by r-protein L4. This regulation requires specific determinants within the untranslated leader of the mRNA. Secondary structure analysis of the S10 leaders of five enterobacteria (Salmonella typhimurium, Citrobacter freundii, Yersinia enterocolitica, Serratia marcescens, and Morganella morganii) and two nonenteric members of the gamma subdivision (Haemophilus influenzae and Vibrio cholerae) shows that these foreign leaders share significant structural homology with the E. coli leader, particularly in the region which is critical for L4-mediated autogenous control in E. coli. Moreover, these heterologous leaders produce a regulatory response to L4 oversynthesis in E. coli. Our results suggest that an E. coli-like L4-mediated regulatory mechanism may operate in all of these species. However, the mechanism is not universally conserved among the gamma subdivision members, since at least one, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, does not contain the required S10 leader features, and its leader cannot provide the signals for regulation by L4 in E. coli. We speculate that L4-mediated autogenous control developed during the evolution of the gamma branch of proteobacteria.

Analysis of the Bacillus subtilis S10 ribosomal protein gene cluster identifies two promoters that may be responsible for transcription of the entire 15-kilobase S10-spc-alpha cluster

We have sequenced a previously uncharacterized region of the Bacillus subtilis S10 ribosomal protein gene cluster. The new segment includes genes for S10, L3, L4, L23, L2, S19, L22, S3, and part of L16. These B. subtilis genes map in the same order as the genes in the Escherichia coli S10 ribosomal protein operon. Two potential promoter sequences were identified, one approximately 200 bases and the other approximately 140 bases upstream of the S10 gene. The activities of the two promoters were demonstrated by primer extension analysis, in vitro transcription experiments, and in vivo promoter fusion plasmid studies. In agreement with previous reports, our Northern analysis of exponentially growing cells failed to identify terminators or other active promoters within the S10-spc-alpha region. Our observations suggest that the two S10 promoters reported here are responsible for transcribing a 15-kb-long transcript for all of the genes in the B. subtilis S10, spc, and alpha clusters.

Translational repression by a transcriptional elongation factor

One of the classical positive regulators of gene expression is bacteriophage lambda N protein. N regulates the transcription of early phage genes by participating in the formation of a highly processive, terminator-resistant transcription complex and thereby stimulates the expression of genes lying downstream of transcriptional terminators. Also included in this antiterminating transcription complex are an RNA site (NUT) and host proteins (Nus). Here we demonstrate that N has an additional, hitherto unknown regulatory role, as a repressor of the translation of its own gene. N-dependent repression does not occur when NUT is deleted, demonstrating that N-mediated antitermination and translational repression both require the same cis-acting site in the RNA. In addition, we have identified one nut and several host mutations that eliminate antitermination and not translational repression, suggesting the independence of these two N-mediated mechanisms. Finally, the position of nutL with respect to the gene whose expression is repressed is important.

A computational approach to modeling nucleic acid hairpin structures

Hairpin is a structural motif frequently observed in both RNA and DNA molecules. This motif is involved specifically in various biological functions (e.g., gene expression and regulation). To understand how these hairpin motifs perform their functions, it is important to study their structures. Compared to protein structural motifs, structures of nucleic acid hairpins are less known. Based on a set of reduced coordinates for describing nucleic acid structures and a sampling algorithm that equilibrates structures using Metropolis Monte Carlo simulation, we developed a method to model nucleic acid hairpin structures. This method was used to predict the structure of a DNA hairpin with a single-guanosine loop. The lowest energy structure from the ensemble of 200 sampled structures has a RMSD of < 1.5 A, from the structure determined using NMR. Additional constraints for the loop bases were introduced for modeling an RNA hairpin with two nucleotides in the loop. The modeled structure of this RNA hairpin has extensive base stacking and an extra hydrogen bond (between the CYT in the loop and a phosphate oxygen), as observed in the NMR structure.

Isolation and preliminary characterization of the Streptococcus mutans rpsJ gene

We previously reported that four putative open reading frames were identified in the regions flanking the Streptococcus mutans GS-5 fructosyltransferase gene. For one of these, ORF 4, only a small region had been isolated and the first 30 nucleotides had been sequenced. In order to determine whether this open reading frame is part of an expressed gene, we isolated a DNA fragment containing intact ORF 4 and a portion of the downstream ORF 5 by inverse polymerase chain reaction. A comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of ORF 4 and ORF 5 with other proteins revealed that the ORF 4 and ORF 5 gene products were highly homologous to ribosomal proteins S10 and L3, respectively, of several bacteria. To identify the precise transcriptional start site for the ORF 4 gene, primer extension analysis was carried out. The results indicated initiation at a G residue with corresponding -10 and -35 regions homologous to the Escherichia coli consensus promoter sequences. These results indicate that the sequences of ORF 4 and ORF 5 are consistent with the structures of ribosomal proteins S10 and L3, respectively, and are present in a ribosomal protein operon.

rRNA transcription and growth rate-dependent regulation of ribosome synthesis in Escherichia coli

The synthesis of ribosomal RNA is the rate-limiting step in ribosome synthesis in bacteria. There are multiple mechanisms that determine the rate of rRNA synthesis. Ribosomal RNA promoter sequences have evolved for exceptional strength and for regulation in response to nutritional conditions and amino acid availability. Strength derives in part from an extended RNA polymerase (RNAP) recognition region involving at least two RNAP subunits, in part from activation by a transcription factor and in part from modification of the transcript by a system that prevents premature termination. Regulation derives from at least two mechanistically distinct systems, growth rate-dependent control and stringent control. The mechanisms contributing to rRNA transcription work together and compensate for one another when individual systems are rendered inoperative.

Translational autoregulation of the sgm gene from Micromonospora zionensis

The sisomicin-gentamicin resistance methylase gene (sgm) from Micromonospora zionensis (the producer of antibiotic G-52 [6-N-methyl-sisomicin]) encodes an enzyme that modifies 16S rRNA and thereby confers resistance to 4,6-disubstituted deoxystreptamine aminoglycosides. Here, we report that this gene is regulated on the translational level. The Escherichia coli lacZ gene and operon fusion system was used, and it was shown that an extra copy of the sgm gene decreases the activity of the fusion protein. These results suggested that expression of the sgm gene is regulated by the translational autorepression because of binding of the methylase to its own mRNA. It was shown by computer analysis that the same hexanucleotide (CCGCCC) is present 14 bp before the ribosome-binding site and in the C-1400 region of 16S rRNA, i.e., the region in which most of the aminoglycosides act. A deletion that removes the hexanucleotide before the gene fusion is not prone to negative autoregulation. This mode of regulation of the sgm gene ensures that enough methylase molecules protect the cell from the action of its own antibiotic. On the other hand, if all of the ribosomes are modified, Sgm methylase binds to its own mRNA in an autorepressive manner.

A hairpin structure upstream of the terminator hairpin required for ribosomal protein L4-mediated attenuation control of the S10 operon of Escherichia coli

Ribosomal protein L4 of Escherichia coli regulates transcription of the 11-gene S1O operon by promoting premature termination of transcription (attenuation) at a specific site within the 172-base untranslated leader. We have analyzed the roles of various domains of the leader RNA in this transcription control. Our results indicate that the first 60 bases of the leader, forming the three proximal hairpin structures, are not essential for in vivo L4-mediated attenuation control. However, a deletion removing the fourth hairpin, which is immediately upstream of the terminator hairpin, eliminates L4's effect on transcription. Base changes disrupting complementarity in the 6-bp stem of this hairpin also abolish L4 control, but compensatory base changes that restore complementarity also restore L4's effect. In vitro transcription studies confirm that this hairpin structure is necessary for L4's role in stimulating transcription termination by RNA polymerase.

Domain I of 23S rRNA competes with a paused transcription complex for ribosomal protein L4 of Escherichia coli

Ribosomal protein L4 of Escherichia coli regulates expression of its own eleven gene S10 operon both by inhibiting translation and by stimulating premature termination of transcription. Both regulatory processes presumably involve L4 recognition of the S10 leader RNA. To help define L4's regulatory target, we have investigated the protein's cognate target on 23S rRNA. Binding of L4 to various fragments of the 23S rRNA was monitored by determining their ability to sequester L4 in an in vitro transcription system and thereby eliminate the protein's effect on transcription. Using this approach we identified a region of about 110 bases within domain I of 23S rRNA which binds L4. A two base deletion within this region, close to the base to which L4 has been cross-linked in intact 50S subunits, eliminates L4 binding. These results also confirm the prediction of the autogenous control model, that L4 bound to its target on rRNA is not active in regulating transcription of the S10 operon.

Intermediates in the degradation of mRNA from the lactose operon of Escherichia coli

We have analyzed the processing of mRNA from the lac operon in an Escherichia coli strain carrying the lac on a multicopy plasmid. Messenger RNA was analyzed by hybridization and nuclease protection of pulse-labeled RNA and precursor-product relationships were determined by quantitating radioactivity in primary and processed transcripts at various times after induction of the lac promoter or inhibition of transcription with rifampicin. Our results support the existence of two types of processed transcripts with endpoints in the lacZ-lacY intercistronic region. One of these carries lacZ sequences and has a 3' endpoint about 30 bases downstream of this gene. The other carries lacY sequences and has a 5' end in the translation termination region of the lacZ gene. Finally, we have found evidence that transcription is continued at least 268 bases beyond the last gene (lacA) and that this 3' non-translated region is shortened by post-transcriptional processing.

Analysis of the spc ribosomal protein operon of Thermus aquaticus

The gene region of Thermus aquaticus corresponding to the distal portion of the S10 operon and to the 5'-portion of the Escherichia coli spc operon was cloned, using the E. coli gene for the ribosomal protein L5 as hybridization probe. The gene arrangement was found to be identical to E. coli, i.e. S17, L14, L24, L5, S14, S8 and L6. Stop and start regions of contiguous cistrons overlap, except for the S14-S8 intergenic region, whose size (67 bases) even exceeds the corresponding spacer regions in E. coli and Bacillus subtilis. A G + C content of 94% in third positions of codons was found in the ribosomal protein genes of T. aquaticus analyzed here. The stop codon of gene S17 (the last gene of the S10 operon in E. coli) and the start codon of gene L14 (the first gene of the spc operon in E. coli) overlap in T. aquaticus, thus leaving no space to accommodate an intergenic promoter preceding spc-operon-encoded genes in T. aquaticus. A possible promoter, localized within the S17 coding region, yielded only weak resistance (20 micrograms/ml) to chloramphenicol in E. coli and therefore could be largely excluded as the main promoter for spc-operon-encoded genes. We failed to detect a structure resembling the protein S8 translational repressor site, located at the beginning of the L5 gene in E. coli, in the corresponding region or any other region in the cloned T. aquaticus spc DNA.

Ribosomal protein L4 stimulates in vitro termination of transcription at a NusA-dependent terminator in the S10 operon leader

The 11-gene S10 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli is under the autogenous control of L4, the product of the third gene of the operon. Ribosomal protein L4 inhibits both transcription and translation of the operon. Our in vivo studies indicated that L4 regulates transcription by causing premature termination within the untranslated S10 operon leader. We have now used an in vitro transcription system to study the effect of purified L4 on expression of the S10 operon. We find that the cell-free system reproduces the in vivo observations. Namely, in the absence of L4, most of the RNA polymerases read through the termination site in the S10 attenuator; the addition of L4 results in increased termination at this site. However, RNA polymerase does not terminate at the S10 attenuator, with or without L4, unless an additional factor, protein NusA, is added to the transcription reaction. These results suggest that the attenuator in the S10 operon is a NusA-dependent terminator whose efficiency is regulated by ribosomal protein L4.

Autogenous control is not sufficient to ensure steady-state growth rate-dependent regulation of the S10 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli

The regulation of the S10 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli was studied by using a lambda prophage containing the beginning of the S10 operon (including the promoter, leader, and first one and one-half structural genes) fused to lacZ. The synthesis of the lacZ fusion protein encoded by the phage showed the expected inhibition during oversynthesis of ribosomal protein L4, the autogenous regulatory protein of the S10 operon. Moreover, the fusion gene responded to a nutritional shift-up in the same way that genuine ribosomal protein genes did. However, the gene did not exhibit the expected growth rate-dependent regulation during steady-state growth. Thus, the genetic information carried on the prophage is sufficient for L4-mediated autogenous control and a normal nutritional shift-up response but is not sufficient for steady-state growth rate-dependent control. These results suggest that, at least for the 11-gene S10 ribosomal protein operon, additional regulatory processes are required to coordinate the synthesis of ribosomal proteins with cell growth rate and, furthermore, that sequences downstream of the proximal one and one-half genes of the operon are involved in this control.

Expression of Escherichia coli dnaA and mioC genes as a function of growth rate

The synthesis of specific cellular components related to the initiation process of DNA replication was correlated with changes in growth rate. The concentrations of DnaA protein and mioC mRNA were determined for cells grown at six different growth rates; both increased relative to either total protein or total RNA, respectively, as the growth rate increased. Expression from the chromosomal mioC promoter, which contains a DnaA protein-binding site, was not repressed when the DnaA protein concentration was increased and was not derepressed in a dnaA46 mutant at 42 degrees C. The mioC transcript had a characteristic mRNA-type half-life of 1.51 min.

Translational coupling of the two proximal genes in the S10 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli

We have examined the translational coupling between the first two genes in the S10 ribosomal protein operon. We isolated mutations blocking the translation of the first gene of the operon, coding for S10, and monitored their effects on translation of the downstream gene, coding for L3. All of the mutations inhibiting S10 synthesis also affected the synthesis of L3. However, these experiments were complicated by decreased mRNA synthesis resulting from transcription polarity, which we could only partially eliminate by using a rho-100 strain. To completely eliminate the problem of transcription polarity and obtain a more accurate measurement of the coupling, we replaced the natural S10 promoter with a promoter used by the bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase. As expected, the T7 RNA polymerase was not subject to transcription polarity. Using this system, we were able to show that a complete abolishment of S10 translation resulted in an 80% inhibition of L3 synthesis. Other experiments show that the synthesis of L3 goes up as a function of increasing S10 synthesis, but the translational coupling does not assure strictly proportional output from the two genes.

Effects of induction of rRNA overproduction on ribosomal protein synthesis and ribosome subunit assembly in Escherichia coli

Overproduction of rRNA was artificially induced in Escherichia coli cells to test whether the synthesis of ribosomal protein (r-protein) is normally repressed by feedback regulation. When rRNA was overproduced more than twofold from a hybrid plasmid carrying the rrnB operon fused to the lambda pL promoter (pL-rrnB), synthesis of individual r-proteins increased by an average of about 60%. This demonstrates that the synthesis of r-proteins is repressed under normal conditions. The increase of r-protein production, however, for unknown reasons, was not as great as the increase in rRNA synthesis and resulted in an imbalance between the amounts of rRNA and r-protein synthesis. Therefore, only a small (less than 20%) increase in the synthesis of complete 30S and 50S ribosome subunits was detected, and a considerable fraction of the excess rRNA was degraded. Lack of complete cooperativity in the assembly of ribosome subunits in vivo is discussed as a possible explanation for the absence of a large stimulation of ribosome synthesis observed under these conditions. In addition to the induction of intact rRNA overproduction from the pL-rrnB operon, the effects of unbalanced overproduction of each of the two large rRNAs, 16S rRNA and 23S rRNA, on r-protein synthesis were examined using pL-rrnB derivatives carrying a large deletion in either the 23S rRNA gene or the 16S rRNA gene. Operon-specific derepression after 23S or 16S rRNA overproduction correlated with the overproduction of rRNA containing the target site for the operon-specific repressor r-protein. These results are discussed to explain the apparent coupling of the assembly of one ribosomal subunit with that of the other which was observed in earlier studies on conditionally lethal mutants with defects in ribosome assembly.

Feedback regulation of the spc operon in Escherichia coli: translational coupling and mRNA processing

The spc operon of Escherichia coli encodes 10 ribosomal proteins in the order L14, L24, L5, S14, S8, L6, L18, S5, L30, and L15. This operon is feedback regulated by S8, which binds near the translation start site of L5 and inhibits translation of L5 directly and that of the distal genes indirectly. We constructed plasmids carrying a major portion of the spc operon genes under lac transcriptional control. The plasmids carried a point mutation in the S8 target site which abolished regulation and resulted in overproduction of plasmid-encoded ribosomal proteins upon induction. We showed that alteration of the AUG start codon of L5 to UAG decreased the synthesis rates of plasmid-encoded distal proteins, as well as L5, by approximately 20-fold, with a much smaller (if any) effect on mRNA synthesis rates, indicating coupling of the distal cistrons' translation with the translation of L5. This conclusion was also supported by experiments in which S8 was overproduced in trans. In this case, there was a threefold reduction in the synthesis rates of chromosome-encoded L5 and the distal spc operon proteins, but no decrease in the mRNA synthesis rate. These observations also suggest that transcription from ribosomal protein promoters may be special, perhaps able to overcome transcription termination signals. We also analyzed the state of ribosomal protein mRNA after overproduction of S8 in these experiments and found that repression of ribosomal protein synthesis was accompanied by stimulation of processing (and degradation) of spc operon mRNA. The possible role of mRNA degradation in tightening the regulation is discussed.

Secondary structure of the leader transcript from the Escherichia coli S10 ribosomal protein operon

Genetic analysis of the autogenous control of the S10 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli has suggested that the secondary or tertiary structure of the leader transcript is important for this regulation. We have therefore determined the secondary structure of the leader by enzyme digestion and chemical modification. Our results suggest that the 172 base leader exists in two forms, differing only immediately upstream of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence of the first gene. We discuss the possibility that the equilibrium between these alternate structures is important for the L4-mediated regulation of translation of the S10 operon. We have also determined the structure of several mutant transcripts. Correlation of these structures with the regulatory phenotypes suggest that a hairpin about 50 bases upstream of the first gene is essential for the control of translation of the operon. Finally, our results show that a two base substitution in an eight base loop destabilizes the attached stem.