Retrotransposition of a mouse L1 element

Redox regulation of a novel L1Md-A2 retrotransposon in vascular smooth muscle cells

Activation and reintegration of retrotransposons into the genome is linked to several diseases in human and rodents, but mechanisms of gene activation remain largely unknown. Here we identify a novel gene of L1Md-A2 lineage in vascular smooth muscle cells and show that environmental hydrocarbons enhance gene expression and activate monomer-driven transcription via a redox-sensitive mechanism. Site-directed mutagenesis and progressive deletion analyses identified two antioxidant/electrophile response-like elements (5'-GTGACTCGAGC-3') within the A2/3 and A3 region. These elements mediated activation, with the A3 monomer playing an essential role in transactivation. This signaling pathway may contribute to gene instability during the course of atherogenesis.

Unusual expression of LINE-1 transposable element in the MRL autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome-prone strain

LINE-1 are endogenous mobile genetic elements that have dispersed and accumulated in the genomes of eukaryotes via germline transposition, with up to 100,000 copies in mammalian genomes. LINE-1 elements transpose by reverse transcription of their own transcript. Transposition requires synthesis of a full-length, sense-strand transcripts and proteins encoded by open reading frame (ORF) 1 and ORF2. Although severely repressed in most normal tissues, LINE-1 occasionally leads to disease by insertional mutagenesis. In the present study, Northern blot and in situ hybridization analyses revealed a template-strand transcription of LINE-1 ORF2 (encoding reverse transcriptase, RT) in lymphoid organs and the liver from MRL-+/+ and Fas-deficient MRL/lpr strains and their normal ancestors. While these sense transcripts are restricted to the nucleus in hepatocytes, they are also found in the cytoplasm in splenocytes. In contrast to transcription, ORF2 translation was detected only in MRL strains, as shown by the cytoplasmic labelling of splenic cells obtained with a monoclonal antibody recognizing the LINE-1 RT. This antibody coprecipitated two proteins of 45 and 12 kDa from MRL/lpr lymphoid organ lysates that were removed by pretreatment with anti-beta2-microglobulin antiserum, suggesting a structural association between a LINE-1 product and a major histocompatibility complex class I or class I-like molecule.

Transplantation of target site specificity by swapping the endonuclease domains of two LINEs

Long interspersed elements (LINEs) are ubiquitous genomic elements in higher eukaryotes. Here we develop a novel assay to analyze in vivo LINE retrotransposition using the telomeric repeat-specific elements SART1 and TRAS1. We demonstrate by PCR that silkworm SART1, which is expressed from a recombinant baculovirus, transposes in Sf9 cells into the chromosomal (TTAGG)n sequences, at the same specific nucleotide position as in the silkworm genome. Thus authentic retrotransposition by complete reverse transcription of the entire RNA transcription unit and occasional 5' truncation is observed. The retrotransposition requires conserved domains in both open reading frames (ORFs), including the ORF1 cysteine- histidine motifs. In contrast to human L1, recognition of the 3' untranslated region sequence is crucial for SART1 retrotransposition, which results in efficient trans-complementation. Swapping the endonuclease domain from TRAS1 into SART1 converts insertion specificity to that of TRAS1. Thus the primary determinant of in vivo target selection is the endonuclease domain, suggesting that modified LINEs could be used as gene therapy vectors, which deliver only genes of interest but not retrotransposons themselves in trans to specific genomic locations.

Expression of transposon LINE-1 is relatively human-specific and function of the transcripts may be proliferation-essential

A new 1.7-kb LINE (L1) transcript has been discovered from the cDNA library of human small-cell lung cancer. The nucleotide sequence of 1.7-kb L1 transcript is 98.4% similar to that of open reading frame 2 (ORF2) found in consensus complete 6.5-kb L1. Although L1 DNA segments could be detected from both genomic DNAs of human and rodent cells by PCR, these L1 transcripts were not detectable from cellular RNA of rodent cells by RT-PCR and northern hybridization, implying that the expression of L1 was relatively human-specific. The functions of L1 transcripts in cells are not yet clear. This paper shows that L1 transcripts are essential for cell proliferation when determined by antisense oligonucleotides. Alternately, L1 transcripts exhibit in all human cells we have examined so far, and they map to all the human chromosomes. A sequence-similarity search in the GenBank database indicates that the major sequence of 1.7-kb L1 is integrated in human retinoblastoma (Rb), IL-2, and factor VIII genes. Since Rb and factor VIII genes have displayed high frequency of chromosomal deletions in various cancers and haemophilia A, the universal integration of long and homologous L1 segments in the genes and all chromosomes may be liable to promote abnormal DNA rearrangement.

Transposable elements: how non-LTR retrotransposons do it

The source of the enzyme activity responsible for the transposition of retrotransposons of the type that lack terminal repeats has at last been identified: in L1Hs elements, it is encoded by the second open reading frame and is a nuclease related to the apurinic repair endonucleases.

The Chironomus (Camptochironomus) tentans genome contains two non-LTR retrotransposons

A cDNA library from salivary gland cells of Chironomus tentans was screened with a probe containing the NLRCth1 non-LTR (long terminal repeat) retrotransposon from Chironomus thummi. Several positive clones were obtained and one of them, p62, was characterized by in situ hybridization and sequencing. The sequencing analysis showed that this clone contained a 4607 bp nucleotide sequence of a new transposable element that hybridized in situ to more than 100 sites over all four C. tentans chromosomes. The detailed analysis of this sequence revealed the presence of the 3'-end of open reading frame 1 (ORF1), a complete ORF2, and a 1.3-kb 3'-end untranslated region (UTR). The new element has been designated NLRCt2 (non-LTR retrotransposon 2 from C. tentans). A comparison of the nucleotide sequences of NLRCth1 and NLRCt2 showed 30% similarity in the region of ORF1 and 70% similarity in the region of ORF2. Based on the results of Southern blot analysis, two transposable elements have been found in the C. tentans genome, one of which is identical to NLRCth1 from C. thummi. This may be explained by horizontal transmission. The second element, NLRCt2, has been found in two different forms in the C. tentans genome. These can be distinguished by the presence of the 1.3-kb 3'-end UTR in one of the forms. Since the cDNA clone investigated was isolated from a tissue-specific cDNA library, the data showed that NRLCt2 is expressed in somatic cells.

High frequency retrotransposition in cultured mammalian cells

We previously isolated two human L1 elements (L1.2 and LRE2) as the progenitors of disease-producing insertions. Here, we show these elements can actively retrotranspose in cultured mammalian cells. When stably expressed from an episome in HeLa cells, both elements retrotransposed into a variety of chromosomal locations at a high frequency. The retrotransposed products resembled endogenous L1 insertions, since they were variably 5' truncated, ended in poly(A) tracts, and were flanked by target-site duplications or short deletions. Point mutations in conserved domains of the L1.2-encoded proteins reduced retrotransposition by 100- to 1000-fold. Remarkably, L1.2 also retrotransposed in a mouse cell line, suggesting a potential role for L1-based vectors in random insertional mutagenesis.

Downstream 28S gene sequences on the RNA template affect the choice of primer and the accuracy of initiation by the R2 reverse transcriptase

R2 non-long terminal repeat retrotransposable elements insert at a unique site in the 28S rRNA genes of insects. The protein encoded by the single open reading frame of R2 is capable of conducting the initial steps of its integration in vitro. The protein nicks the noncoding strand of the 28S target DNA (the strand which serves as a template for RNA synthesis) and uses the 3' hydroxyl group exposed by this nick to prime reverse transcription of the R2 RNA template. This target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT) reaction requires that the RNA template contains the 250-nucleotide 3' untranslated region of the R2 element. If this RNA template ends at the precise 3' end of the R2 element, then extra nucleotides, which we refer to as nontemplated nucleotides, are added to the target before cDNA synthesis. The presence of downstream 28S gene sequences on the RNA template reduces the total efficiency but eliminates these nontemplated additions, resulting in nearly 90% of all TPRT products reproducing the 3' junctions seen in vivo. Templates with 5 to 10 nucleotides of the 28S sequence are used most efficiently in this in vitro TPRT reaction. The requirement for downstream 28S rRNA sequences probably explains why the R2 elements of most insects differ from the majority of non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons in that they do not contain an A-rich repeat at their 3' junction with the target DNA. The presence of downstream sequences on these in vitro R2 templates also revealed that the R2 reverse transcriptase can prime cDNA synthesis by using the 3' end of another RNA molecule. This RNA-primed cDNA synthesis is not based on sequence complementarity between the RNA primer and the R2 template. The ability to use the 3' end of a noncomplementary RNA molecule has also been seen with the reverse transcriptase of the mitochondrial Mauriceville plasmid of Neurospora crassa.

Error-prone retrotransposition: rime of the ancient mutators

Images

Analysis of the 5' junctions of R2 insertions with the 28S gene: implications for non-LTR retrotransposition

R2 elements are non-long terminal repeat retrotransposable elements that insert into 28S rRNA genes of most insect species. The single open reading frame of R2 encodes a protein with both endonuclease activity, which cleaves the target site, and reverse transcriptase activity, which uses this cleavage to prime reverse transcription. This target-primed reverse transcription mechanism is also used by group II introns. Little is known of the mechanism by which the 5' end of R2 is integrated after reverse transcription. We have determined the 5' junction sequence of 94 R2 elements from 14 different species of Drosophila. Only 37% of the full-length elements contained precise 5' junctions; the remainder contained deletions of the 28S gene and/or insertions of additional sequences. Because the 5' junctions of truncated copies were similar to full-length elements, no sequences at the 5' end of R2 appear to be required for element integration. A model in which the R2 reverse transcriptase is capable of switching templates from the R2 RNA transcript to the upstream 28S gene can best explain the observed 5' junction sequences. This template jumping is analogous to the template switching of retroviral reverse transcriptases during formation of the double-stranded integration products.

Identification of sequences which regulate the expression of Drosophila melanogaster Doc elements

Long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) are mobile DNA elements which propagate by reverse transcription of RNA intermediates. LINEs lack long terminal repeats, and their expression is controlled by promoters located inside to the transcribed region of unit-length DNA copies. Doc elements constitute one of the seven families of LINEs found in Drosophila melanogaster. Plasmids in which the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene is preceded by DNA segments from different Doc family members were used as templates for transient expression assays in Drosophila S2 cells. Transcription is initiated at the 5' end of Doc elements within hexamers fitting the consensus (C/G)AYTCG and is regulated by a DNA region which is located approximately 20 base pairs (bp) downstream from the RNA start site(s). The region includes a sequence (RGACGTGY motif, or DE2) which stimulates transcription in other Drosophila LINEs, and two adjacent elements, DE1 and DE3. Moving the downstream region either 4 bp away from, or 5 bp closer to the RNA start site region inhibited transcription. Sequences located approximately 200 bp downstream from the Doc 5' end repressed CAT expression in an orientation- and position-dependent manner. The inhibition reflects impaired translation of the CAT gene possibly consequent to the interaction of specific Doc RNA sequences with a cellular component.

RNA polymerase III dependence of the human L1 promoter and possible participation of the RNA polymerase II factor YY1 in the RNA polymerase III transcription system

From the general views of the eukaryotic transcription systems, L1 (or L1-like) retrotransposons that encode some proteins are unusual. L1, unlike other protein-coding elements, is transcribed through an internal promoter. And the L1 internal promoter, unlike other internal promoters, is thought to be RNA polymerase II (pol II) dependent, because the L1 transcript has a large size (approximately 6 kb), protein coding capacity and a 3' terminal polyadenylation signal followed by a poly(A) tail, and also because transcription from the promoter of Drosophila L1-like element jockey was highly sensitive to alpha-amanitin. However, our in vitro transcription study reveals that transcription from the human L1 promoter is highly sensitive to tagetitoxin, a selective inhibitor of RNA polymerase III (pol III), but insensitive to 1 micrograms/ml of alpha-amanitin, indicating that the human L1 promoter is pol III-dependent. The pol III dependence is further supported by our observation that L1 and pol III-dependent tRNA gene promoters share a common nuclear factor YY1. There is evidence that YY1 is also a pol II transcription factor. We thus propose that YY1 is a possible member of the pol III transcription system.

A new non-LTR retrotransposon provides evidence for multiple distinct site-specific elements in Crithidia fasciculata miniexon arrays

We have identified a new member of the family of trypanosome site-specific retrotransposons, using a degenerate oligonucleotide PCR strategy. The 9595 bp element, termed Crithidia retrotransposable element 2 (CRE2), was cloned and found to be inserted in the tandemly arrayed miniexon genes of Crithidia fasciculata. The element is flanked by 29 bp target site duplications but lacks the 3' poly dA tract characteristic of most other non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons. The amino terminal region of the single 2518-codon open reading frame contains a putative metal-binding motif and a proline-rich region similar to gag-like domains of other retrotransposons. The carboxy terminal region of this open reading frame shares sequence homology with the reverse transcriptase and putative endonuclease regions of three previously described trypanosomatid site-specific retrotransposons. All four of these retrotransposons are specifically inserted between nucleotides 11 and 12 of the highly conserved 39mer sequence of the miniexon gene. Most copies of CRE2 and the previously characterized CRE1 are located on different sized chromosomes. Additional CRE-related sequences were identified by screening Crithidia libraries. These results suggest that a particular sequence in the C. fasciculata miniexon repeat is the target for multiple distinct site-specific retrotransposon insertions.

RNA template requirements for target DNA-primed reverse transcription by the R2 retrotransposable element

R2 is a non-long terminal repeat-retrotransposable element that inserts specifically in the 28S rRNA gene of most insects. The single protein encoded by R2 has been shown to contain both site-specific endonuclease and reverse transcriptase activities. Integration of the element involves cleavage of one strand of the 28S target DNA and the utilization of the exposed 3' hydroxyl group to prime the reverse transcription of the R2 RNA transcript. We have characterized the RNA requirement of this target DNA-primed reverse transcription reaction and found that the 250 nucleotides corresponding to the 3' untranslated region of the R2 transcript were necessary and sufficient for the reaction. To investigate the sequence requirements at the site of reverse transcription initiation, a series of RNA templates that contained substitutions and deletions at the extreme 3' end of the RNA were tested. The R2 templates used most efficiently had 3' ends which corresponded to the precise boundary of the R2 element with the 28S gene found in vivo. Transcripts containing short polyadenylated tails (8 nucleotides) were not utilized efficiently. R2 RNAs that were truncated at their 3' ends by 3 to 6 nucleotides were used less efficiently as templates and then only after the R2 reverse transcriptase had added extra, apparently nontemplated, nucleotides to the target DNA. The ability of the reverse transcriptase to add additional nucleotides to the target DNA before engaging the RNA template might be a mechanism for the generation of poly(A) or simple repeat sequences found at the 3' end of most non-long terminal repeat-retrotransposable elements.

Retroelements: propagation and adaptation

Retroelements are genetic entities that exist in both DNA and RNA forms generated by cyclic alternation of transcription and reverse transcription. They have in common a genetic core (the gag-pol core), encoding conserved functions of a structural protein and a replicase. These are supplemented with a variety of cis-acting nucleic acid sequences controlling transcription and reverse transcription. Most retroelements have additional genes with regulatory or adaptive roles, both within the cell and for movement between cells and organisms. These features reflect the variety of mechanisms that have developed to ensure propagation of the elements and their ability to adapt to specific niches in their hosts with which they co-evolve.

BS a novel LINE-like element in Drosophila melanogaster

Transposable elements with long terminal inverted repeats are rare and only one family of elements of this sort has been identified in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster. An insertion associated with the HSBS mutation of the achaete-scute complex has been reported to be a second element of this type. We have determined the complete sequence of this insertion and have shown that it is in fact two copies of a new LINE-like transposable element, that we have called BS, inserted in opposite orientation 337 bp apart. Like other elements of this type, BS has two open reading frames that appear to encode a gag-like polypeptide and a reverse transcriptase. There are few complete BS elements in the five strains of D.melanogaster that we have tested and they appear to transpose infrequently. The events that may have lead to the double BS insertion are discussed in terms of the supposed mechanism of transposition of LINE-like elements.

Molecular evolution. Retroposon revivals

Phylogenetic studies of the mouse L1 retroposon family show that the elements evolve through successively active subfamilies, which differ from each other by complete replacements of their promoter sequences.

A defective non-LTR retrotransposon is dispersed throughout the genome of the silkworm, Bombyx mori

The presence of long repetitive sequences is demonstrated in the genome of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Members of this BMC1 family reveal several features typical of the L1 (long interspersed sequence one) family of mammals, except for species specific elements. The number of BMC1 elements is estimated to be approximately 3500 per haploid genome. Elements containing the full length unit of 5.1 kb are dispersed throughout the genome and their restriction sites are conserved, although most members are preferentially truncated to varying extents at their 5' ends. DNA sequencing indicates that this element contains six tandem repeats of 15 bp CpG-rich sequence in the 5' proximal region. It terminates with a 3' oligo(A) stretch, and is flanked at both ends by a 7-10 bp target sequence duplication. In addition, there is significant evidence for amino acid sequence homology with reverse transcriptase domains of other L1 families, especially F, Doc and Jockey of Drosophila melanogaster. No large open reading frame is present. The BMC1 element is suggested to be dispersed in the genome by a transposition mechanism involving RNA intermediates.

The full-length transcript of the I factor, a LINE element of Drosophila melanogaster, is a potential bicistronic RNA messenger

The I factor of Drosophila melanogaster is a retrotransposon of the LINE superfamily. The I factor displays two non-overlapping open reading frames (ORFs) that have the potential to encode for a nucleic acid-binding protein (ORF1) and a reverse transcriptase (ORF2). Retrotransposition of the I factor has been demonstrated and a putative full-length RNA intermediate has been identified. No other transcript from functional I factor has ever been described, suggesting that the full-length RNA is also used as a messenger. Here we report that a bicistronic RNA which conserves the ORF1-ORF2 organization of the I factor transcript is a template for ORF2 translation in vivo. We further demonstrate that the first AUG of ORF2 initiates translation, but efficiency of this initiation increases approximately 200 fold when ORF1 is deleted. Our results show that the I factor transcript may be used to translate both ORFs from their own initiation codons at different rates. Various mechanisms of translation are proposed.

LINE-related elements in Drosophila melanogaster

Mobile elements known as LINEs are members of a superfamily of repeated DNA conserved from protozoa to man. These sequences propagate by the retrotranscription of RNA intermediates and differ in many respects from retroviruses. Whereas most eukaryotic genomes host a single LINE family, several families of LINE-like sequences or type II retrotransposons coexist in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Properties and features of these elements are discussed in this work.

The mammalian genome shaping activity of reverse transcriptase

Reverse transcriptase catalyses the conversion of RNA into DNA. This operation seems to have largely contributed to the evolution of complex genomes. More than 10% of a mammalian genome is composed of sequences with reverse transcribed origin, most of which consists of repeated sequences (SINEs, LINEs). In spite of their simplicity, these sequences can play a key role in evolution by favoring illegitimate recombination. In addition to this abundant material, retrotransposed sequences include retrotransposons, retroviruses and genes depleted from intervening sequences, known as pseudogenes. Some of these sequences can be functional or involved in the regulation of neighbouring genes. These hallmarks of reverse transcription activity indicate that it has largely contributed to the fluidity of modern genomes.

Mosquito transposable elements

Most of the transposons so far characterized from mosquito genomes are retroelements which seem to be distributed worldwide. The Juan transposons constitute a family of non-LTR retroelements, or LINE-retroposons, which are dispersed in the genomes of several mosquito species. Three different Juan subfamilies have been characterized, each being amplified in the genomes of many strains, if not all, of a given mosquito species. These subfamilies have been designated respectively Juan-C in Culex pipiens, Juan-Ct in Culex tarsalis and Juan-A in Aedes aegypti. A large number of the Juan retroposons which are amplified in the mosquito genomes are apparently full-length copies and potentially encode the enzymes necessary for their transposition, a nucleic acid binding protein and a reverse transcriptase. However, these complete Juan copies seem to be most frequently transcriptionally silent in insects reared under laboratory conditions. A few of them are transcribed in C. pipiens cells grown in vitro, but from an external promoter, the Juan-C specific RNA being fused to an upstream RNA sequence. Therefore, the transcription of Juan retroposons seems to depend on external promoters which are most frequently inactive. The occurrence and distribution of Juan retroposon subfamilies among mosquito species do not reflect the phylogeny of these species. Furthermore, complete Juan-C and Juan-A copies which are reiterated in strains collected from regions covering different continents are nearly identical. Juan-C copies belonging to geographically different C. pipiens strains display low levels of divergence between their nucleotide sequences and many of the mutations which have occurred among these copies do not alter their coding potential. These results indicate that the Juan retroposons occur as homogeneous subfamilies distributed worldwide and that selective constraints against amino acid change have been acting recently on these elements, despite the fact that they are now highly repeated through mosquito genomes. Therefore, Juan transposons have most probably been recently amplified in mosquito genomes. Each subfamily may have been amplified from one master element present in a unique population which has since spread worldwide. Alternatively, this amplification may have arisen in many mosquito populations, but from highly conserved master elements submitted to selection pressures. Horizontal transfers between species may also have contributed to the spread of these transposons.

Q: a new retrotransposon from the mosquito Anopheles gambiae

A new family of retrotransposons (RTPs) without long terminal repeats (LTRs), designated Q, has been isolated from the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. The nucleotide sequence of a complete element Q-22, was determined and analysed. Approximately 4.5 kb long, Q-22 contains two long overlapping open reading frames (ORFs) that potentially encode proteins with nucleic acid binding and reverse transcriptase domains similar to those of non-LTR RTPs previously described. The 3' end is characterized by variable numbers of the triplet repeat TAA, immediately following a polyadenylation signal. In situ hybridization of nurse cell polytene chromosomes revealed about twenty labelled sites distributed over all arms and diffuse hybridization to the chromocentre. Cross-hybridizing sequences with the same internal structure occur in all members of the A. gambiae complex. Genomic Southerns of wild A. gambiae specimens probed with Q suggest that Q is or recently was capable of retrotransposition.

The Doc transposable element in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: genomic distribution and transcription

The mobile element Doc is similar in structure and coding potential to the LINE families found in various organisms. In this paper, we analyze the insertional and structural polymorphism of this element and show that it appears to have a long evolutionary history in the genome of D. melanogaster. Like the family of I elements, the Doc family seems to display three types of elements: full length elements, defective members that have recently transposed and long since immobilized members common to each D. melanogaster strain. These three classes of Doc elements seem to be present in D. simulans, a closely related species to D. melanogaster. Furthermore, we show that Doc is transcribed as a polyadenylated RNA of about 5 kb in length, presumed to be a full length RNA. This transcript is present in different tissues and at different stages of Drosophila development. These results are compared with previous records on the chromosomal distribution of LINEs or other transposable element families. Doc transcription is analyzed in an attempt to understand the link between Doc transcription and transposition.

Transnuclear retrotransposition of the Tad element of Neurospora

Tad is a LINE-like DNA element found in Neutrospora crassa. A Neurospora artificial intron based on the first intron of the am (glutamate dehydrogenase) gene was constructed and introduced, in the correct orientation, into a unique Nru I site in open reading frame 1 of an active Tad element, Tad1-1. Transformants containing the Tad element with the artificial intron were placed in forced heterokaryons with strains lacking Tad elements. Tad was shown to transpose between nuclei in these heterokaryons. Examination of the transposed Tad elements showed that the intron had been precisely removed in all cases. This confirms that Tad is a retrotransposon and that there is a cytoplasmic phase in these retrotransposition events.

Synchronous expression of LINE-1 RNA and protein in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells

L1, or LINE-1, is a repetitive DNA family found in all mammalian genomes that have been examined. At least a few individual members of the L1 family are functional transposable elements. Expression of these active elements leads to new insertions of L1 into the genomic DNA by the process of retrotransposition. We have detected coexpression of full-length, sense-strand L1 RNA transcripts and L1-encoded protein in mouse embryonal carcinoma cell lines. Both of these L1 expression products are candidates for intermediates in the retrotransposition process. L1 protein is found in what appear to be cytoplasmic aggregates and is not localized to any known cytoplasmic organelles. The six embryonal carcinoma cell lines tested were chosen to represent commitment to different developmental pathways in early mouse embryogenesis. The only two cell lines that express L1 are unique among the six in that they have a strong predilection to differentiate into extraembryonic endoderm. This observation is consistent with L1 expression and transposition in primordial germ cells of the mouse. An important implication of these studies is that L1 expression may provide a new marker for use in determining the origin of primordial germ cells during mouse embryogenesis.

Synchronous expression of LINE-1 RNA and protein in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells

L1, or LINE-1, is a repetitive DNA family found in all mammalian genomes that have been examined. At least a few individual members of the L1 family are functional transposable elements. Expression of these active elements leads to new insertions of L1 into the genomic DNA by the process of retrotransposition. We have detected coexpression of full-length, sense-strand L1 RNA transcripts and L1-encoded protein in mouse embryonal carcinoma cell lines. Both of these L1 expression products are candidates for intermediates in the retrotransposition process. L1 protein is found in what appear to be cytoplasmic aggregates and is not localized to any known cytoplasmic organelles. The six embryonal carcinoma cell lines tested were chosen to represent commitment to different developmental pathways in early mouse embryogenesis. The only two cell lines that express L1 are unique among the six in that they have a strong predilection to differentiate into extraembryonic endoderm. This observation is consistent with L1 expression and transposition in primordial germ cells of the mouse. An important implication of these studies is that L1 expression may provide a new marker for use in determining the origin of primordial germ cells during mouse embryogenesis.

Germ-line expression of the I factor, a functional LINE from the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, is positively regulated by reactivity, a peculiar cellular state

I factor is a functional LINE (long interspersed nucleotidic element) which is mobilized in the germ-line of dysgenic SF females during I-R hybrid dysgenesis. Such females are obtained when an oocyte from a reactive stock, devoid of I factors but characterized by a level of reactivity, i.e. its potential for hybrid dysgenesis, is fertilized by a spermatozoon from an I factor-containing inducer stock. In a previous paper we described the expression of an I factor-lacZ fusion. Expression was detected in the ovaries of reactive and dysgenic flies only. In this paper we show that this transgenic activity can be quantified and depends upon the maternally inherited reactivity. Reactivity is not just a permissive state and modifiers of the reactivity level such as heat treatment and ageing change the level of expression of our transgenic fusion accordingly. Moreover, ageing through generations has the same cumulative and reversible effect on both reactivity and I factor expression. Using our fusion as a test for reactivity we show that the silencing of I factor after its introduction into a reactive genome may not be established in a single generation.

The remarkable evolutionary history of the human amylase genes

Analysis of the structures of the human amylase genes has demonstrated that this multigene family contains at least five tandem gene copies, closely related in sequence but with distinct tissue specific expression. The structures of the genes demonstrate that the human salivary amylase gene was derived from a preexisting pancreatic amylase gene. Insertion of a retrovirus upstream of the amylase gene is responsible for the alteration in tissue specificity. A parotid specific enhancer has been identified within the retrovirus by expression studies in transgenic mice. The independent origin of salivary amylase in rodents and primates suggests that there has been strong evolutionary selection for amylase in saliva. The amylase genes demonstrate a novel mechanism for evolution of new patterns of tissue specific gene expression.

An abundant LINE-like element amplified in the genome of Lilium speciosum

The genomes of Lilium species are very large, containing 30-40 million kilobase pairs of DNA. An abundant fragment of 3.5 kb was released by BamHI digestion of genomic DNA of Lilium speciosum. Analysis of 20 genomic clones containing sequences homologous to the fragment showed it to be part of a 4.45 kb dispersed repeat, which was named del2. Sequence analysis of one full element and regions of four others revealed del2 to be a non-LTR (long terminal repeat) retrotransposon. It is flanked by short direct repeats of from 4 to 13 bp and a run of adenines occurs at one end (the proposed 3' end), 63 bp downstream from a polyadenylation signal. A possible RNA polymerase II promoter similar to that found in Drosophila I and F group elements is present internally 30 bp downstream from the 5' end. Two degenerate open reading frames (ORFs) are present, the 5' ORF containing a gag-related cysteine motif, and the 3' ORF containing a different cysteine motif also found in most non-LTR retrotransposons. The 3' ORF also has regions with homology to reverse transcriptase sequences, which are most similar to those in Cin4 of maize, the L1 LINE elements of humans and mice and the R2 ribosomal DNA inserts of insects. The majority of del2 elements occur as the full 4.45 kb element. They account for an estimated 4% of the L. speciosum genome and are present in approximately 250,000 copies. del2-related sequences were also detected in 12 other monocot species.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Distinct families of site-specific retrotransposons occupy identical positions in the rRNA genes of Anopheles gambiae

Two distinct site-specific retrotransposon families, named RT1 and RT2, from the sibling mosquito species Anopheles gambiae and A. arabiensis, respectively, were previously identified. Both were shown to occupy identical nucleotide positions in the 28S rRNA gene and to be flanked by identical 17-bp target site duplications. Full-length representatives of each have been isolated from a single species, A. gambiae, and the nucleotide sequences have been analyzed. Beyond insertion specificity, RT1 and RT2 share several structural and sequence features which show them to be members of the LINE-like, or non-long-terminal-repeat retrotransposon, class of reverse transcriptase-encoding mobile elements. These features include two long overlapping open reading frames (ORFs), poly(A) tails, the absence of long terminal repeats, and heterogeneous 5' truncation of most copies. The first ORF of both elements, particularly ORF1 of RT1, is glutamine rich and contains long tracts of polyglutamine reminiscent of the opa repeat. Near the carboxy ends, three cysteine-histidine motifs occur in ORF1 and one occurs in ORF2. In addition, each ORF2 contains a region of sequence similarity to reverse transcriptases and integrases. Alignments of the protein sequences from RT1 and RT2 reveal 36% identity over the length of ORF1 and 60% identity over the length of ORF2, but the elements cannot be aligned in the 5' and 3' noncoding regions. Unlike that of RT2, the 5' noncoding region of RT1 contains 3.5 copies of a 500-bp subrepeat, followed by a poly(T) tract and two imperfect 55-bp subrepeats, the second spanning the beginning of ORF1. The pattern of distribution of these elements among five siblings species in the A. gambiae complex is nonuniform. RT1 is present in laboratory and wild A. gambiae, A. arabiensis, and A. melas but has not been detected in A. quadriannulatus or A. merus. RT2 has been detected in all available members of the A. gambiae complex except A. merus. Copy number fluctuates, even among the offspring of individual wild female A. gambiae mosquitoes. These findings reflect a complex evolutionary history balancing gain and loss of copies against the coexistence of two elements competing for a conserved target site in the same species for perhaps millions of years.

Distinct families of site-specific retrotransposons occupy identical positions in the rRNA genes of Anopheles gambiae

Two distinct site-specific retrotransposon families, named RT1 and RT2, from the sibling mosquito species Anopheles gambiae and A. arabiensis, respectively, were previously identified. Both were shown to occupy identical nucleotide positions in the 28S rRNA gene and to be flanked by identical 17-bp target site duplications. Full-length representatives of each have been isolated from a single species, A. gambiae, and the nucleotide sequences have been analyzed. Beyond insertion specificity, RT1 and RT2 share several structural and sequence features which show them to be members of the LINE-like, or non-long-terminal-repeat retrotransposon, class of reverse transcriptase-encoding mobile elements. These features include two long overlapping open reading frames (ORFs), poly(A) tails, the absence of long terminal repeats, and heterogeneous 5' truncation of most copies. The first ORF of both elements, particularly ORF1 of RT1, is glutamine rich and contains long tracts of polyglutamine reminiscent of the opa repeat. Near the carboxy ends, three cysteine-histidine motifs occur in ORF1 and one occurs in ORF2. In addition, each ORF2 contains a region of sequence similarity to reverse transcriptases and integrases. Alignments of the protein sequences from RT1 and RT2 reveal 36% identity over the length of ORF1 and 60% identity over the length of ORF2, but the elements cannot be aligned in the 5' and 3' noncoding regions. Unlike that of RT2, the 5' noncoding region of RT1 contains 3.5 copies of a 500-bp subrepeat, followed by a poly(T) tract and two imperfect 55-bp subrepeats, the second spanning the beginning of ORF1. The pattern of distribution of these elements among five siblings species in the A. gambiae complex is nonuniform. RT1 is present in laboratory and wild A. gambiae, A. arabiensis, and A. melas but has not been detected in A. quadriannulatus or A. merus. RT2 has been detected in all available members of the A. gambiae complex except A. merus. Copy number fluctuates, even among the offspring of individual wild female A. gambiae mosquitoes. These findings reflect a complex evolutionary history balancing gain and loss of copies against the coexistence of two elements competing for a conserved target site in the same species for perhaps millions of years.

Characterization of the reverse transcriptase of 1731, a Drosophila melanogaster retrotransposon

The nucleotide sequence of 1731, a retrotransposon cloned from the genome of Drosophila melanogaster, reveals a structural similarity with the proviral form of the retroviruses including a pol-like gene containing a putative reverse-transcriptase(RT)-coding sequence. Diverse parts of that sequence were subcloned and expressed in Escherichia coli. It has been demonstrated that the expression of the RT-like sequence, when translated, gives rise to peptides displaying enzyme activity characteristic of a true RT enzyme. In addition, rabbit antisera directed against such recombinant proteins allowed us to detect an immunoreactive protein of around 110 kDa, which was only present in D. melanogaster cell lines, but not in cells derived from Drosophila virilis or Drosophila hydei, whose genomes do not bear the 1731 element. This protein is expected to correspond to a non-processed pol-gene translated product and cosediments with virus-like particles exhibiting RT activity.

Endogenous retroviral sequences are required for tissue-specific expression of a human salivary amylase gene

The human salivary amylase genes are associated with two inserted elements, a gamma-actin-processed pseudogene and an endogenous retroviral-like element. To test the contribution of these inserted elements to tissue specificity, 25 lines of transgenic mice carrying 10 amylase constructs were established. A 1-kb fragment of AMY1C (-1003 to +2) was found to be sufficient for parotid-specific expression of a human growth hormone reporter gene. The 1-kb fragment is entirely derived from inserted sequences. Deletion from -1003 to -826 resulted in reduced levels of transgene expression and loss of tissue specificity. The fragment -1003 to -327 was sufficient to transfer parotid specificity to the thymidine kinase promoter. The data demonstrate that the functional tissue-specific promoter of human AMY1C is derived from inserted sequences and that parotid expression can be conferred by sequences derived solely from the retrovirus. A role for retrotransposition in the evolution of gene regulation is indicated by these and other recent observations.

Spatial and temporal expression of the I factor during oogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster

The I factor is a functional non-viral retrotransposon, or LINE, from Drosophila melanogaster. Its mobility is associated with the I-R hybrid dysgenesis. In order to study the expression pattern of this LINE in vivo, a translational fusion between the first ORF of the I factor and the lacZ gene of Escherichia coli has been carried out and introduced in the genome of reactive (R) flies. Homozygous transgenic Drosophila lines have been established and analysed. ORF1 expression is limited to germ-line cells (nurse cells and oocyte) between stage 2 and 10 of oogenesis. No somatic expression is found. Position effects may limit the level of expression of a given transgene but do not modify its basic pattern of expression during the development of the fly. This reproducible control demonstrates both that I factor is driven by its own promoter, probably the internal one suggested by Mizrokhi et al. (Mizrokhi, L.J., Georgevia, S.G. and Ilying, Y.V. (1988). Cell 54, 685–691), and that tissue-specific regulatory sequences are present in the 5′ untranslated part of the I factor. The nuclear localization of the fusion protein reveals the presence of nuclear localization signals (NLS) in the ORF1-encoded protein correlating with the possible structural and/or regulatory role of this protein. This expression is restricted to dysgenic and reactive females, and is similar in the two conditions. All the results obtained in this work suggest that I factor transposition occurs as a meiotic event, between stage 2 and 10 of the oogenesis and is regulated at the transcriptional level. It also appears that our transgene is an efficient marker to follow I factor expression.

I elements and the Drosophila genome

LINEs are a large class of transposable elements in eukaryotes. They transpose by reverse transcription of an RNA intermediate. I elements of Drosophila melanogaster belong to this class and are responsible for the I-R system of hybrid dysgenesis. Many results indicate that at the beginning of the century natural populations of this species were devoid of active I elements and that they were invaded by functional I elements in the last decades. Many Drosophila species contain both defective and active I elements. It seems that the latter were lost in Drosophila melanogaster before its spread throughout the world, and that the recent invasion results from the spread of functional elements originating either from another species by horizontal transfer or from an isolated population of the same species. These data are discussed, as well as their significance in evolutionary processes.