Nonconservative segregation of parental nucleosomes during simian virus 40 chromosome replication in vitro

Inheritance of Histones H3 and H4 during DNA Replication In Vitro

Nucleosomes are believed to carry epigenetic information through the cell cycle, including through DNA replication. It has been known for decades that parental histones are reassembled on newly replicated chromatin, but the mechanisms underlying histone inheritance and dispersal during DNA replication are not fully understood. We monitored the fate of histones H3 or H4 from a single nucleosome through DNA replication in two in vitro systems. In the SV40 system, histones assembled on a single nucleosome positioning sequence can be inherited by their own daughter DNA but are dispersed from their original location. In Xenopus laevis extracts, histones are dynamic, and nucleosomes are repositioned independent of and prior to DNA replication. Nevertheless, a high fraction of histones H3 and H4 that are inherited through DNA replication remains near its starting location. Thus, inheritance of histone proteins and their dispersal can be mechanistically uncoupled.

Chromatin replication: TRANSmitting the histone code

Efficient overcoming of the nucleosomal barrier and accurate maintenance of associated histone marks during chromatin replication are essential for normal functioning of the cell. Recent studies revealed new protein factors and histone modifications contributing to overcoming the nucleosomal barrier, and suggested an important role for DNA looping in survival of the original histones during replication. These studies suggest new possible mechanisms for transmitting the histone code to next generations of cells.

Overcoming a nucleosomal barrier to replication

Efficient overcoming and accurate maintenance of chromatin structure and associated histone marks during DNA replication are essential for normal functioning of the daughter cells. However, the molecular mechanisms of replication through chromatin are unknown. We have studied traversal of uniquely positioned mononucleosomes by T7 replisome in vitro. Nucleosomes present a strong, sequence-dependent barrier for replication, with particularly strong pausing of DNA polymerase at the +(31-40) and +(41-65) regions of the nucleosomal DNA. The exonuclease activity of T7 DNA polymerase increases the overall rate of progression of the replisome through a nucleosome, likely by resolving nonproductive complexes. The presence of nucleosome-free DNA upstream of the replication fork facilitates the progression of DNA polymerase through the nucleosome. After replication, at least 50% of the nucleosomes assume an alternative conformation, maintaining their original positions on the DNA. Our data suggest a previously unpublished mechanism for nucleosome maintenance during replication, likely involving transient formation of an intranucleosomal DNA loop.

Assembling chromatin: the long and winding road

It has been over 35 years since the acceptance of the "chromatin subunit" hypothesis, and the recognition that nucleosomes are the fundamental repeating units of chromatin fibers. Major subjects of inquiry in the intervening years have included the steps involved in chromatin assembly, and the chaperones that escort histones to DNA. The following commentary offers an historical perspective on inquiries into the processes by which nucleosomes are assembled on replicating and nonreplicating chromatin. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Histone chaperones and Chromatin assembly.

Molecular traffic jams on DNA

All aspects of DNA metabolism-including transcription, replication, and repair-involve motor enzymes that move along genomic DNA. These processes must all take place on chromosomes that are occupied by a large number of other proteins. However, very little is known regarding how nucleic acid motor proteins move along the crowded DNA substrates that are likely to exist in physiological settings. This review summarizes recent progress in understanding how DNA-binding motor proteins respond to the presence of other proteins that lie in their paths. We highlight recent single-molecule biophysical experiments aimed at addressing this question, with an emphasis placed on analyzing the single-molecule, ensemble biochemical, and in vivo data from a mechanistic perspective.

The inheritance of histone modifications depends upon the location in the chromosome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Histone modifications are important epigenetic features of chromatin that must be replicated faithfully. However, the molecular mechanisms required to duplicate and maintain histone modification patterns in chromatin remain to be determined. Here, we show that the introduction of histone modifications into newly deposited nucleosomes depends upon their location in the chromosome. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, newly deposited nucleosomes consisting of newly synthesized histone H3-H4 tetramers are distributed throughout the entire chromosome. Methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3-K4), a hallmark of euchromatin, is introduced into these newly deposited nucleosomes, regardless of whether the neighboring preexisting nucleosomes harbor the K4 mutation in histone H3. Furthermore, if the heterochromatin-binding protein Sir3 is unavailable during DNA replication, histone H3-K4 methylation is introduced onto newly deposited nucleosomes in telomeric heterochromatin. Thus, a conservative distribution model most accurately explains the inheritance of histone modifications because the location of histones within euchromatin or heterochromatin determines which histone modifications are introduced.

Nucleosome assembly and epigenetic inheritance

In eukaryotic cells, histones are packaged into octameric core particles with DNA wrapping around to form nucleosomes, which are the basic units of chromatin (Kornberg and Thomas, 1974). Multicellular organisms utilise chromatin marks to translate one single genome into hundreds of epigenomes for their corresponding cell types. Inheritance of epigenetic status is critical for the maintenance of gene expression profile during mitotic cell divisions (Allis et al., 2006). During S phase, canonical histones are deposited onto DNA in a replication-coupled manner (Allis et al., 2006). To understand how dividing cells overcome the dilution of epigenetic marks after chromatin duplication, DNA replication coupled (RC) nucleosome assembly has been of great interest. In this review, we focus on the potential influence of RC nucleosome assembly processes on the maintenance of epigenetic status.

Epigenetic regulation of centromeric chromatin: old dogs, new tricks?

The assembly of just a single kinetochore at the centromere of each sister chromatid is essential for accurate chromosome segregation during cell division. Surprisingly, despite their vital function, centromeres show considerable plasticity with respect to their chromosomal locations and activity. The establishment and maintenance of centromeric chromatin, and therefore the location of kinetochores, is epigenetically regulated. The histone H3 variant CENP-A is the key determinant of centromere identity and kinetochore assembly. Recent studies have identified many factors that affect CENP-A localization, but their precise roles in this process are unknown. We build on these advances and on new information about the timing of CENP-A assembly during the cell cycle to propose new models for how centromeric chromatin is established and propagated.

Chromatin assembly during DNA replication in somatic cells

Newly replicated DNA is assembled into chromatin through two principle pathways. Firstly, parental nucleosomes segregate to replicated DNA, and are transferred directly to one of the two daughter strands during replication fork passage. Secondly, chromatin assembly factors mediate de-novo assembly of nucleosomes on replicating DNA using newly synthesized and acetylated histone proteins. In somatic cells, chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF-1) appears to be a key player in assembling new nucleosomes during DNA replication. It provides a molecular connection between newly synthesized histones and components of the DNA replication machinery during the S phase of the cell division cycle.

Role of amino-terminal histone domains in chromatin replication

Simian virus 40 minichromosomes were treated with trypsin to specifically remove the amino-terminal histone domains (tails). Trypsin treatment does not affect the spacing and the number of nucleosomes on minichromosomes but indices a more extended conformation, as shown by the reduced sedimentation coefficient of trypsinized minichromosomes compared with the untreated controls. Trypsinized minichromosomes replicate more efficiently than control minichromosomes in in vitro replication assays. The increased template efficiency appears to be due to higher rates of replicative fork movement. In vitro replication in the presence of protein-free competitor DNA shows that replicating trypsinized minichromosomes do not lose nucleosomes and replicating competitor DNA does not gain nucleosomes. This finding suggests that tailless nucleosomes are transferred from the unreplicated prefork stem to replicated DNA branches and excludes a participation of the basic histone domains in nucleosome transfer.

Influence of histone H1 on the in vitro replication of DNA and chromatin

The influence of histone H1 on DNA replication was studied using the SV40 in vitro replication system with two different templates: histone H1/DNA complexes and SV40 minichromosomes reconstituted with H1. We found that the cytosolic extracts used as a source of enzymes for in vitro replication contained high amounts of RNA which competed with template DNA for the binding of histone H1. Removal of this RNA was necessary to ensure the stability of the templates thus allowing for the first time the study of the replication of histone H1-carrying templates in vitro. In contrast to the inhibitory effect of histone H1 on the initiation of transcription, bound H1, when present at physiological ratios, does not interfere with the in vitro replication of DNA and minichromosomes. Ratios higher than one H1 molecule per nucleosome affected replication of reconstituted SV40 minichromosomes.

Re-replication of SV40 minichromosomes is inhibited at the stage of chain elongation

The template activities of protein-free SV40 DNA and SV40 minichromosomes for DNA re-replication are compared in in vitro replication assays. Density substitution experiments and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis show that protein-free DNA can replicate for at least two cycles whereas salt-treated minichromosomes replicate only once. Re-replication of minichromosomes is blocked at the stage of replicative chain elongation suggesting that replicatively assembled chromatin has structural features that prevent a second round of replication.

A critical role for chromatin in mounting a synergistic transcriptional response to GAL4-VP16

The role of chromatin in mounting a synergistic transcriptional response to GAL4-VP16 was investigated. Strong synergy was observed when chromatin templates were used in vitro. The synergy was severely reduced when naked DNA templates were transcribed. In vivo synergy was strong when nonreplicating templates were used. However, the use of replicating templates, which involved transient disruptions of chromatin, led to strong reductions in synergy. In both of these low-synergy responses, transcription levels were high. We infer that strong synergy has a requirement for chromatin that may be understood in terms of the competition between multiple activator molecules and histone cores for promoter DNA.

A critical role for chromatin in mounting a synergistic transcriptional response to GAL4-VP16

The role of chromatin in mounting a synergistic transcriptional response to GAL4-VP16 was investigated. Strong synergy was observed when chromatin templates were used in vitro. The synergy was severely reduced when naked DNA templates were transcribed. In vivo synergy was strong when nonreplicating templates were used. However, the use of replicating templates, which involved transient disruptions of chromatin, led to strong reductions in synergy. In both of these low-synergy responses, transcription levels were high. We infer that strong synergy has a requirement for chromatin that may be understood in terms of the competition between multiple activator molecules and histone cores for promoter DNA.

Parental nucleosomes segregated to newly replicated chromatin are underacetylated relative to those assembled de novo

Antibodies specific for acetylated histone H4 were used to examine the acetylation state of parental histones that segregate to newly replicated DNA. To generate newly replicated chromatin containing only segregated parental nucleosomes, isolated nuclei were labeled with [3H]TTP in vitro; alternatively, whole cells were labeled with [3H]thymidine in the presence of cycloheximide. Soluble chromatin was prepared by micrococcal nuclease digestion, and subjected to immunoprecipitation with "penta" antibodies (Lin et al., 1989). In sharp contrast to nucleosomes containing newly synthesized, diacetylated H4 (Perry et al., 1993), chromatin replicated in vitro was only marginally susceptible to immunoprecipitation. Control experiments established that bona fide acetylated chromatin was selectively immunoprecipitated by the same techniques and that segregated nucleosomes were not disassembled during treatment with "penta" antibodies. When replication was coupled to an in vitro histone acetylation system, the enrichment for segregated nucleosomes in the immunopellet increased approximately 3-fold, demonstrating that changes in the acetylation state of segregated histones can be detected immunologically and that parental histones on new DNA are accessible to acetyltransferases during, or immediately after, DNA replication. In vivo pulse-chase experiments, performed in the presence of cycloheximide, confirmed these results. Uptake experiments further established that concurrent histone acetylation did not alter the rate of DNA synthesis in vitro. Our results provide evidence that replication-competent chromatin is not obligatorily acetylated, and indicate that the acetylation status of segregated histones may be maintained during chromatin replication. The possible significance of this, with respect to the regulation of chromatin higher order structures during DNA replication, and the propagation of transcriptionally active vs inactive chromatin structures, is discussed.