Interaction of the Dr1 inhibitory factor with the TATA binding protein is disrupted by adenovirus E1A

A host susceptibility gene, DR1, facilitates influenza A virus replication by suppressing host innate immunity and enhancing viral RNA replication

Influenza A virus (IAV) depends on cellular factors to complete its replication cycle; thus, investigation of the factors utilized by IAV may facilitate antiviral drug development. To this end, a cellular transcriptional repressor, DR1, was identified from a genome-wide RNA interference (RNAi) screen. Knockdown (KD) of DR1 resulted in reductions of viral RNA and protein production, demonstrating that DR1 acts as a positive host factor in IAV replication. Genome-wide transcriptomic analysis showed that there was a strong induction of interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression after prolonged DR1 KD. We found that beta interferon (IFN-β) was induced by DR1 KD, thereby activating the JAK-STAT pathway to turn on ISG expression, which led to a strong inhibition of IAV replication. This result suggests that DR1 in normal cells suppresses IFN induction, probably to prevent undesired cytokine production, but that this suppression may create a milieu that favors IAV replication once cells are infected. Furthermore, biochemical assays of viral RNA replication showed that DR1 KD suppressed viral RNA replication. We also showed that DR1 associated with all three subunits of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) complex, indicating that DR1 may interact with individual components of the viral RdRp complex to enhance viral RNA replication. Thus, DR1 may be considered a novel host susceptibility gene for IAV replication via a dual mechanism, not only suppressing the host defense to indirectly favor IAV replication but also directly facilitating viral RNA replication.

IMPORTANCE

Investigations of virus-host interactions involved in influenza A virus (IAV) replication are important for understanding viral pathogenesis and host defenses, which may manipulate influenza virus infection or prevent the emergence of drug resistance caused by a high error rate during viral RNA replication. For this purpose, a cellular transcriptional repressor, DR1, was identified from a genome-wide RNAi screen as a positive regulator in IAV replication. In the current studies, we showed that DR1 suppressed the gene expression of a large set of host innate immunity genes, which indirectly facilitated IAV replication in the event of IAV infection. Besides this scenario, DR1 also directly enhanced the viral RdRp activity, likely through associating with individual components of the viral RdRp complex. Thus, DR1 represents a novel host susceptibility gene for IAV replication via multiple functions, not only suppressing the host defense but also enhancing viral RNA replication. DR1 may be a potential target for drug development against influenza virus infection.

The adenovirus E1A N-terminal repression domain represses transcription from a chromatin template in vitro

The adenovirus repression domain of E1A 243R at the E1A N-terminus (E1A 1-80) transcriptionally represses genes involved in differentiation and cell cycle progression. E1A 1-80 represses transcription in vitro from naked DNA templates through its interaction with p300 and TFIID. E1A 1-80 can also interact with several chromatin remodeling factors and associates with chromatin in vivo. We show here that E1A 243R and E1A 1-80 can repress transcription from a reconstituted chromatin template in vitro. Temporal analysis reveals strong repression by E1A 1-80 when added at pre-activation, activation and early transcription stages. Interestingly, E1A 1-80 can greatly enhance transcription from chromatin templates, but not from naked DNA, when added at pre-initiation complex (PIC) formation and transcription-initiation stages. These data reveal a new dimension for E1A 1-80's interface with chromatin and may reflect its interaction with key players in PIC formation, p300 and TFIID, and/or possibly a role in chromatin remodeling.

Dr1 (NC2) is present at tRNA genes and represses their transcription in human cells

Dr1 (also known as NC2β) was identified as a repressor of RNA polymerase (pol) II transcription. It was subsequently shown to inhibit pol III transcription when expressed at high levels in vitro or in yeast cells. However, endogenous Dr1 was not detected at pol III-transcribed genes in growing yeast. In contrast, we demonstrate that endogenous Dr1 is present at pol III templates in human cells, as is its dimerization partner DRAP1 (also called NC2α). Expression of tRNA by pol III is selectively enhanced by RNAi-mediated depletion of endogenous human Dr1, but we found no evidence that DRAP1 influences pol III output in vivo. A stable association was detected between endogenous Dr1 and the pol III-specific transcription factor Brf1. This interaction may recruit Dr1 to pol III templates in vivo, as crosslinking to these sites increases following Brf1 induction. On the basis of these data, we conclude that the physiological functions of human Dr1 include regulation of pol III transcription.

Role of Heat Shock Proteins in Viral Infection

One of the most intriguing and less known aspects of the interaction between viruses and their host is the impact of the viral infection on the heat shock response (HSR). While both a positive and a negative role of different heat shock proteins (HSP) in the control of virus replication has been hypothesized, HSP function during the virus replication cycle is still not well understood. This chapter describes different aspects of the interactions between viruses and heat shock proteins during infection of mammalian cells: the first part focuses on the modulation of the heat shock response by human viral pathogens; the second describes the interactions of HSP and other chaperones with viral components, and their function during different steps of the virus replication cycle; the last part summarizes our knowledge on the effect of hyperthermia and HSR modulators on virus replication.

The double-histone-acetyltransferase complex ATAC is essential for mammalian development

Acetylation of the histone tails, catalyzed by histone acetyltransferases (HATs), is a well-studied process that contributes to transcriptionally active chromatin states. Here we report the characterization of a novel mammalian HAT complex, which contains the two acetyltransferases GCN5 and ATAC2 as well as other proteins linked to chromatin metabolism. This multisubunit complex has a similar but distinct subunit composition to that of the Drosophila ADA2A-containing complex (ATAC). Recombinant ATAC2 has a weak HAT activity directed to histone H4. Moreover, depletion of ATAC2 results in the disassembly of the complex, indicating that ATAC2 not only carries out an enzymatic function but also plays an architectural role in the stability of mammalian ATAC. By targeted disruption of the Atac2 locus in mice, we demonstrate for the first time the essential role of the ATAC complex in mammalian development, histone acetylation, cell cycle progression, and prevention of apoptosis during embryogenesis.

The initiator core promoter element antagonizes repression of TATA-directed transcription by negative cofactor NC2

Core promoter regions of protein-coding genes in metazoan genomes are structurally highly diverse and can contain several distinct core promoter elements, which direct accurate transcription initiation and determine basal promoter strength. Diversity in core promoter structure is an important aspect of transcription regulation in metazoans as it provides a basis for gene-selective function of activators and repressors. The basal activity of TATA box-containing promoters is dramatically enhanced by the initiator element (INR), which can function in concert with the TATA box in a synergistic manner. Here we report that a functional INR provides resistance to NC2 (Dr1/DRAP1), a general repressor of TATA promoters. INR-mediated resistance to NC2 is established during transcription initiation complex assembly and requires TBP-associated factors (TAFs) and TAF- and INR-dependent cofactor activity. Remarkably, the INR appears to stimulate TATA-dependent transcription similar to activators by strongly enhancing recruitment of TFIIA and TFIIB and, at the same time, by compromising NC2 binding.

Recruitment of Hsp70 chaperones: a crucial part of viral survival strategies

Virus proliferation depends on the successful recruitment of host cellular components for their own replication, protein synthesis, and virion assembly. In the course of virus particle production a large number of proteins are synthesized in a relatively short time, whereby protein folding can become a limiting step. Most viruses therefore need cellular chaperones during their life cycle. In addition to their own protein folding problems viruses need to interfere with cellular processes such as signal transduction, cell cycle regulation and induction of apoptosis in order to create a favorable environment for their proliferation and to avoid premature cell death. Chaperones are involved in the control of these cellular processes and some viruses reprogram their host cell by interacting with them. Hsp70 chaperones, as central components of the cellular chaperone network, are frequently recruited by viruses. This review focuses on the function of Hsp70 chaperones at the different stages of the viral life cycle emphasizing mechanistic aspects.

Adenovirus protein VII condenses DNA, represses transcription, and associates with transcriptional activator E1A

Adenovirus protein VII is the major protein component of the viral nucleoprotein core. It is highly basic, and an estimated 1070 copies associate with each viral genome, forming a tightly condensed DNA-protein complex. We have investigated DNA condensation, transcriptional repression, and specific protein binding by protein VII. Xenopus oocytes were microinjected with mRNA encoding HA-tagged protein VII and prepared for visualization of lampbrush chromosomes. Immunostaining revealed that protein VII associated in a uniform manner across entire chromosomes. Furthermore, the chromosomes were significantly condensed and transcriptionally silenced, as judged by the dramatic disappearance of transcription loops characteristic of lampbrush chromosomes. During infection, the protein VII-DNA complex may be the initial substrate for transcriptional activation by cellular factors and the viral E1A protein. To investigate this possibility, mRNAs encoding E1A and protein VII were comicroinjected into Xenopus oocytes. Interestingly, whereas E1A did not associate with chromosomes in the absence of protein VII, expression of both proteins together resulted in significant association of E1A with lampbrush chromosomes. Binding studies with proteins produced in bacteria or human cells or by in vitro translation showed that E1A and protein VII can interact in vitro. Structure-function analysis revealed that an N-terminal region of E1A is responsible for binding to protein VII. These studies define the in vivo functions of protein VII in DNA binding, condensation, and transcriptional repression and indicate a role in E1A-mediated transcriptional activation of viral genes.

The multifunctional role of E1A in the transcriptional regulation of CREB/CBP-dependent target genes

Oncoproteins encoded by the early region 1A (E1A) of adenoviruses (Ads) have been shown to be powerful tools to study gene regulatory mechanisms. As E1A proteins lack a sequence-specific DNA-binding activity, they modulate viral and cellular gene expression by interacting directly with a diverse array of cellular factors, among them sequence-specific transcription factors, proteins of the general transcription machinery, co-activators and chromatin-modifying enzymes. By making use of these factors, E1A affects major cellular events such as cell cycle control, differentiation, apoptosis, and oncogenic transformation. In this review we will focus on the interaction of E1A with cellular components involved in the cAMP/PKA signal transduction pathway and we will discuss the consequences of these interactions in respect to the activation of CREB/CBP-dependent target genes.

The adenovirus e3 promoter is sensitive to activation signals in human T cells

The group C adenoviruses typically cause acute respiratory disease in young children. In addition, a persistent phase of infection has been observed in which virus may be shed for years without producing overt pathology. Our laboratory recently reported that group C adenovirus DNA can be found in tonsil and adenoid T lymphocytes from the majority of pediatric donors (C. T. Garnett, D. Erdman, W. Xu, and L. R. Gooding, J. Virol. 76:10608-10616, 2002). This finding suggests that immune evasion strategies of human adenoviruses may be directed, in part, toward protection of persistently or latently infected T lymphocytes. Many of the adenoviral gene products implicated in prevention of immune destruction of virus-infected cells are encoded within the E3 transcription unit. In this study, the E3 promoter was evaluated for sensitivity to T-cell activation signals by using a promoter reporter plasmid. Indeed, this promoter is extremely sensitive to T-cell activation, with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) plus ionomycin increasing E3-directed transcription 100-fold. By comparison, in the same cells E1A expression leads to a 5.5-fold increase in transcription from the E3 promoter. In contrast to induction by E1A, activation by PMA plus ionomycin requires the two E3 NF-kappaB binding sites. Interestingly, expression of E1A inhibits induction of the E3 promoter in response to T-cell activation while increasing E3 promoter activity in unactivated cells. Collectively, these data suggest that the E3 promoter may have evolved the capacity to respond to T-cell activation in the absence of E1A expression and may act to upregulate antiapoptotic gene expression in order to promote survival of persistently infected T lymphocytes.

Direct stimulation of transcription by negative cofactor 2 (NC2) through TATA-binding protein (TBP)

Negative cofactor 2 (NC2) is an evolutionarily conserved transcriptional regulator that was originally identified as an inhibitor of basal transcription. Its inhibitory mechanism has been extensively characterized; NC2 binds to the TATA-binding protein (TBP), blocking the recruitment of TFIIA and TFIIB, and thereby inhibiting preinitiation complex assembly. NC2 is also required for expression of many yeast genes in vivo and stimulates TATA-less transcription in a Drosophila in vitro transcription system, but the mechanism responsible for the NC2-mediated stimulation of transcription is not understood. Here we establish that yeast NC2 can directly stimulate activated transcription from TATA-driven promoters both in vivo and in vitro, and moreover that this positive role requires the same surface of TBP that mediates the NC2 repression activity. On the basis of these results, we propose a model to explain how NC2 can mediate both repression and activation through the same surface of TBP.

Adenovirus E1A requires the yeast SAGA histone acetyltransferase complex and associates with SAGA components Gcn5 and Tra1

The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was used as a model system to study the function of the adenovirus E1A oncoprotein. Previously we demonstrated that expression of the N-terminal 82 amino acids of E1A in yeast causes pronounced growth inhibition and specifically interferes with SWI/SNF-dependent transcriptional activation. Further genetic analysis identified the yeast transcription factor Adr1 as a high copy suppressor of E1A function. Transcriptional activation by Adr1 requires interaction with co-activator proteins Ada2 and Gcn5, components of histone acetyltransferase complexes including ADA and SAGA. Analysis of mutant alleles revealed that several components of the SAGA complex, including proteins from the Ada, Spt, and Taf classes were required for E1A-induced growth inhibition. Growth inhibition also depended on the Gcn5 histone acetyltransferase, and point mutations within the Gcn5 HAT domain rendered cells E1A-resistant. Also required was SAGA component Tra1, a homologue of the mammalian TRRAP protein which is required for c-myc and E1A induced cellular transformation. Additionally, Gcn5 protein could associate with E1A in vitro in a manner that depended on the N-terminal domain of E1A, and Tra1 protein was co-immunoprecipitated with E1A in vivo. These results indicate a strong requirement for intact SAGA complex for E1A to function in yeast, and suggest a role for SAGA-like complexes in mammalian cell transformation.

Adenoviruses with Tcf binding sites in multiple early promoters show enhanced selectivity for tumour cells with constitutive activation of the wnt signalling pathway

Mutation of the adenomatous polyposis coli and beta-catenin genes in colon cancer leads to constitutive activation of transcription from promoters containing binding sites for Tcf/LEF transcription factors. We have constructed adenoviruses with Tcf binding sites in the early promoters, in order to target viral replication to colon tumours. Tcf regulation of the E1A promoter confers a 100-fold selectivity for cells with activated wnt signalling in viral burst and cytopathic effect assays. p300 is a coactivator for beta-catenin, and E1A inhibits Tcf-dependent transcription through sequestration of p300, but mutation of the p300 binding site in E1A leads to a 10-fold reduction in cytopathic effect of all of the Tcf-regulated viruses. When Tcf sites are inserted in the E1A, E1B, E2 and E4 promoters the viruses show up to 100 000-fold selectivity for cells with activated wnt signalling.

Influence of HMG-1 and adenovirus oncoprotein E1A on early stages of transcriptional preinitiation complex assembly

The TATA-binding protein (TBP) in the TFIID complex binds specifically to the TATA-box to initiate the stepwise assembly of the preinitiation complex (PIC) for RNA polymerase II transcription. Transcriptional activators and repressors compete with general transcription factors at each step to influence the course of the assembly. To investigate this process, the TBP.TATA complex was titrated with HMG-1 and the interaction monitored by electrophoretic mobility shift assays. The titration produced a ternary HMG-1.TBP. TATA complex, which exhibits increased mobility relative to the TBP. TATA complex. The addition of increasing levels of TFIIB to this complex results in the formation of the TFIIB.TBP.TATA complex. However, in the reverse titration, with very high mole ratios of HMG-1 present, TFIIB is not dissociated off and a complex is formed that contains all factors. The simultaneous addition of E1A to a mixture of TBP and TATA; or HMG-1, TBP, and TATA; or TFIIB, TBP, and TATA inhibits complex formation. On the other hand, E1A added to the pre-established complexes shows a significantly reduced capability to disrupt the complex. In add-back experiments with all complexes, increased levels of TBP re-established the complexes, indicating that the primary target for E1A in all complexes is TBP.

The retinoblastoma gene family members pRB and p107 coactivate the AP-1-dependent mouse tissue factor promoter in fibroblasts

Serum-stimulation of quiescent mouse fibroblasts results in transcriptional activation of tissue factor (TF), the cellular initiator of blood coagulation. This requires the rapid entry of c-Fos into specific AP-1 DNA-binding complexes and can be strongly inhibited by the adenovirus EIA 12S gene product. In this study, we utilized a panel of E1A mutants deficient in cellular protein binding to analyse the molecular basis for EIA inhibition of a minimal, c-Fos-dependent TF promoter/ reporter construct in mouse AKR-2B fibroblasts. Mutations which impaired binding of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein family members pRB, p107, and p130 relieved E1A-mediated inhibition of transcription in response to serum-stimulation or c-Fos overexpression. Inhibition was restricted to the G0 to G1 transition, consistent with the specificity of E1A for hypophosphorylated forms of RB proteins. Although E1A mutants deficient in CBP/p300 binding retained the ability to inhibit TF transcription, deletion of the amino-terminal portion of the CBP/p300 interaction domain was required to permit rescue of TF promoter activity by coexpression of pRB. Moreover, ectopic p107 could effectively substitute for pRB in relieving E1A-mediated repression. In primary mouse embryo fibroblasts, activity of the minimal AP-1-dependent TF promoter was suppressed in Rb(-/-) cells compared to parallel Rb(+/-) and Rb(+/+) transfectants. Ectopic expression of either pRB or p107 markedly enhanced TF promoter activity in Rb(-/-) fibroblasts. Collectively, these data imply that pRB and p107 can cooperate with c-Fos to activate TF gene transcription in fibroblasts and suggest a requirement for another, as yet unidentified, E1A-binding protein.

The C-terminal domain-phosphorylated IIO form of RNA polymerase II is associated with the transcription repressor NC2 (Dr1/DRAP1) and is required for transcription activation in human nuclear extracts

Activation of class II gene transcription may involve alleviation of transcription repression as well as stimulation of the assembly and function of the general RNA polymerase (RNAP) II transcription machinery. Here, we investigated whether activator-reversible transcription repression by NC2 (Dr1/DRAP1) contributes to maximum induction levels in unfractionated HeLa nuclear extracts. Surprisingly, we found that depletion of NC2 does not significantly affect basal transcription, but dramatically reduces activated transcription. Immunoblot analyses revealed that the loss of activator function coincides with selective removal of the C-terminal domain (CTD)-hyperphosphorylated RNAP IIO along with NC2. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments with purified factors confirmed that NC2 interacts with RNAP IIO, but not with the unphosphorylated or hypophosphorylated RNAP IIA or CTD-less RNAP IIB forms. Finally, we demonstrate that, in contrast to previously published observations in cell-free systems reconstituted with purified factors, only the CTD-phosphorylated form of RNAP II can mediate activator function in the context of unfractionated HeLa nuclear extracts. These findings reveal an unexpected link between NC2 and transcription activation and suggest that regulation of RNAP II transcription through reversible CTD phosphorylation might be more complex than previously proposed.

RNA polymerase III transcription: its control by tumor suppressors and its deregulation by transforming agents

The level of RNA polymerase (pol) III transcription is tightly linked to the rate of growth; it is low in resting cells and increases following mitogenic stimulation. When mammalian cells begin to proliferate, maximal pol III activity is reached shortly before the G1/S transition; it then remains high throughout S and G2 phases. Recent data suggest that the retinoblastoma protein RB and its relatives p107 and p130 may be largely responsible for this pattern of expression. During G0 and early G1 phase, RB and p130 bind and repress the pol III-specific factor TFIIIB; shortly before S phase they dissociate from TFIIIB, allowing transcription to increase. At the end of interphase, when cells enter mitosis, pol III transcription is again suppressed; this mitotic repression is achieved through direct phosphorylation of TFIIIB. Thus, pol III transcription levels fluctuate as mammalian cells cycle, being high in S and G2 phases and low during mitosis and early G1. In addition to this cyclic regulation, TFIIIB can be bound and repressed by the tumor suppressor p53. Conversely, it is a target for activation by several viruses, including SV40, HBV, and HTLV-1. Some viruses also increase the activity of a second pol III-specific factor called TFIIIC. A large proportion of transformed and tumor cell types express abnormally high levels of pol III products. This may be explained, at least in part, by the very high frequency with which RB and p53 become inactivated during neoplastic transformation; loss of function of these cardinal tumor suppressors may release TFIIIB from key restraints that operate in normal cells.

Glial cell-specific regulation of the JC virus early promoter by large T antigen

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a fatal demyelinating disease that results from an oligodendrocyte infection caused by JC virus. The JC virus early promoter directs cell-specific expression of the viral replication factor large T antigen, and thus transcriptional regulation constitutes a major mechanism of glial tropism in PML. We have previously demonstrated that T antigen controls the JC virus basal promoter in a glial cell-specific manner, since T antigen repressed the JC virus and simian virus 40 (SV40) early promoters in glioma cells but induced strong activation of the JC virus early promoter in nonglial cells. To further analyze these findings, T antigen and nuclear extracts from glial and nonglial cells were used to examine DNase I footprints on the proximal promoter. T-antigen binding to site II was more extensive than expected based on sequence homology with SV40, and nuclear proteins protected several regions of the proximal promoter in a cell-specific manner. Multiple Sp1 binding domains were identified. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed that T-antigen-mediated activation required a TATA box sequence, a pentanucleotide repeat immediately upstream of the TATA box, and an Sp1 binding site downstream of the TATA box. When footprints were obtained with mutant promoters which blocked T-antigen-induced transactivation, no change in T-antigen binding was observed. These results suggest that T antigen activates the JC virus basal promoter in nonglial cells by interaction with the transcription initiation complex.

Inhibition of transcription of class II, but not class III and I, genes in Xenopus postblastular embryos overexpressed with the TBP-binding protein, Dr1 (NC2beta)

Dr1 (NC2beta) is known to effectively repress transcription of class II genes, and much less effectively class III genes, but not class I genes through its binding to the TATA-binding protein (TBP), which is the major component of the basal transcription factor for polymerases II, III, and I. Previously, we isolated Xenopus Dr1 cDNA, and demonstrated that its mRNA is transcribed in oocytes and is inherited into early embryos, but its level decreases in later stages. Here, we overexpressed Xenopus Dr1 in Xenopus embryos and, found that the overexpression significantly reduces the levels of poly(A), cytoskeletal actin and histone H4 mRNAs, and the labeling of heterogeneous mRNA-like RNA in postblastular embryos, without affecting tRNA and rRNA syntheses. These results indicate that the overexpressed Dr1 specifically down-regulates the transcription of class II, but not class III and I, genes, and suggest that Dr1 plays an important role in the control of transcription in Xenopus embryogenesis.

E1A can provoke G1 exit that is refractory to p21 and independent of activating cdk2

E1A can evoke G1 exit in cardiac myocytes and other cell types by displacing E2F transcription factors from tumor suppressor "pocket" proteins and by a less well-characterized p300-dependent pathway. Bypassing pocket proteins (through overexpression of E2F-1) reproduces the effect of inactivating pocket proteins (through E1A binding); however, pocket proteins associate with a number of molecular targets apart from E2F. Hence, pocket protein binding by E1A might engage mechanisms for cell cycle reentry beyond those induced by E2F-1. To test this hypothesis, we used adenoviral gene transfer to express various E2F-1 and E1A proteins in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes that are already refractory to mitogenic serum, in the absence or presence of several complementary cell cycle inhibitors-p16, p21, or dominant-negative cyclin-dependent kinase-2 (Cdk2). Rb binding by E2F-1 was neither necessary nor sufficient for G1 exit, whereas DNA binding was required; thus, exogenous E2F-1 did not merely function by competing for the Rb "pocket." E2F-1-induced G1 exit was blocked by the "universal" Cdk inhibitor p21 but not by p16, a specific inhibitor of Cdk4/6; p21 was permissive for E2F-1 induction of cyclins E and A, but prevented their stimulation of Cdk2 kinase activity. In addition, E2F-1-induced G1 exit was blocked by dominant-negative Cdk2. Forced expression of cyclin E induced endogenous Cdk2 activity but not G1 exit. Thus, E2F-1-induced Cdk2 function was necessary, although not sufficient, to trigger DNA synthesis in cardiac muscle cells. In contrast, pocket protein-binding forms of E1A induced G1 exit that was resistant to inhibition by p21, whereas G1 exit via the E1A p300 pathway was sensitive to inhibition by p21. Both E1A pathways-via pocket proteins and via p300-upregulated cyclins E and A and Cdk2 activity, consistent with a role for Cdk2 in G1 exit induced by E1A. However, p21 blocked Cdk2 kinase activity induced by both E1A pathways equally. Thus, E1A can cause G1 exit without an increase in Cdk2 activity, if the pocket protein-binding domain is intact. E1A also overrides p21 in U2OS cells, provided the pocket protein-binding domain is intact; thus, this novel function of E1A is not exclusive to cardiac muscle cells. In summary, E1A binding to pocket proteins has effects beyond those produced by E2F-1 alone and can drive S-phase entry that is resistant to p21 and independent of an increase in Cdk2 function. This suggests the potential involvement of other endogenous Rb-binding proteins or of alternative E1A targets.

Carboxy-terminally truncated form of a coactivator UTF1 stimulates transcription from a variety of gene promoters through the TATA Box

We have recently isolated a novel transcriptional coactivator, UTF1, which is expressed mainly in pluripotent embryonic stem cells (Okuda, A., Fukushima, A., Nishimoto, M., Orimo, A., Yamagishi, T., Nabeshima, Y., Kuro-o, M., Nabeshima, Y., Boon, K., Keaveney, M., Stunnenberg, H. G., and Muramatsu, M. EMBO J. 17, 2019-2032, 1998). The UTF1 does not activate transcription nonspecifically, but boosts the level of transcription strictly in a specific upstream factor, ATF-2, dependent manner in mammalian cells. However, when expressed in yeast cells, the UTF1 displays a distinct activity, being able to augment the activity of minimal promoter bearing only the TATA element. Thus, these results indicate that certain domains of UTF1 render the factor inactive in terms of stimulating transcription through the basal transcription machinery in the absence of promoter-bound ATF-2 in mammalian cells. Here we report that the region bearing the leucine zipper motif is responsible for such biochemical properties of the UTF1. Indeed, UTF1 lacking functional leucine zipper is able to rather promiscuously stimulate transcription from a number of basal gene promoters such as those of hsp70 and E1B genes in mammalian cells. We have also shown that this activation is executed through TATA box by the experiments using a TBP allele with an altered TATA-binding specificity. Moreover, we have found that Dr1-mediated repression of transcription can be overcome by expression of this mutant UTF1, indicating that the observed stimulation of transcription is at least in part due to its action as an anti-repressor.

A novel function of adenovirus E1A is required to overcome growth arrest by the CDK2 inhibitor p27(Kip1)

We show here that the adenovirus E1A oncoprotein prevents growth arrest by the CDK2 inhibitor p27(Kip1) (p27) in rodent fibroblasts. However, E1A neither binds p27 nor prevents inhibition of CDK2 complexes in vivo. In contrast, the amount of free p27 available to inhibit cyclin E/CDK2 is increased in E1A-expressing cells, owing to reduced expression of cyclins D1 and D3. Moreover, E1A allows cell proliferation in the presence of supraphysiological p27 levels, while c-Myc, known to induce a cellular p27-inhibitory activity, is only effective against physiological p27 concentrations. E1A also bypasses G1 arrest by roscovitine, a chemical inhibitor of CDK2. Altogether, these findings imply that E1A can act downstream of p27 and CDK2. Retinoblastoma (pRb)-family proteins are known CDK substrates; as expected, association of E1A with these proteins (but not with p300/CBP) is required for E1A to prevent growth arrest by either p27 or the CDK4/6 inhibitor p16(INK4a). Bypassing CDK2 inhibition requires an additional function of E1A: the mutant E1A Delta26-35 does not overcome p27-induced arrest, while it binds pRb-family proteins, prevents p16-induced arrest, and alleviates pRb-mediated repression of E2F-1 transcriptional activity (although E1A Delta26-35 fails to restore expression of E2F-regulated genes in p27-arrested cells). We propose that besides the pRb family, E1A targets specific effector(s) of CDK2 in G1-S control.

p300/CREB-binding protein enhances the prolactin-mediated transcriptional induction through direct interaction with the transactivation domain of Stat5, but does not participate in the Stat5-mediated suppression of the glucocorticoid response

Stat5 was discovered as a PRL-induced member of the Stat (signal transducer and activator of transcription) family. Its induction by many other cytokines and interleukins suggests that Stat5 plays a crucial role not only in mammary epithelial, but also in hematopoietic cells. Cell type- and promoter-specific functions of Stat5 are most likely modulated by the interaction with other transcription factors. We recently showed cross-talk between Stat5 and the glucocorticoid receptor. The activated glucocorticoid receptor forms a complex with Stat5 and enhances Stat5-mediated transcriptional induction. Conversely, Stat5 diminishes the induction of glucocorticoid-responsive genes. Here, we investigated the role of p300/CBP(CREB-binding protein), a transcriptional coactivator of several groups of transcription factors, in Stat5-mediated transactivation and in the cross-talk between Stat5 and the glucocorticoid receptor. p300/ CBP acts as a coactivator of Stat5. Its ectopic expression enhances PRL-induced Stat5-mediated transcriptional activation. Consistent with this observation, we find that the adenovirus E1A protein, which binds to p300/CBP, suppresses Stat5-induced transcriptional activation. This inhibition requires the Stat5 transactivation domain and the p300/CBP binding site of E1A. Coimmunoprecipitation and mammalian two-hybrid assays demonstrate a direct interaction between the carboxyl-terminal transactivation domain of Stat5 and p300/CBP. p300/CBP also positively interacts with the glucocorticoid receptor and enhances glucocorticoid receptor-dependent transcriptional activation of the mouse mammary tumor virus-long terminal repeat promoter. Overexpression of p300/CBP does not counteract the Stat5-mediated inhibition of glucocorticoid receptor-dependent transactivation, i.e. the repression of the glucocorticoid response by Stat5 is not a consequence of competition for limiting amounts of p300/CBP.

A cellular repressor of E1A-stimulated genes that inhibits activation by E2F

The adenovirus E1A protein both activates and represses gene expression to promote cellular proliferation and inhibit differentiation. Here we report the identification and characterization of a cellular protein that antagonizes transcriptional activation and cellular transformation by E1A. This protein, termed CREG for cellular repressor of E1A-stimulated genes, shares limited sequence similarity with E1A and binds both the general transcription factor TBP and the tumor suppressor pRb in vitro. In transfection assays, CREG represses transcription and antagonizes 12SE1A-mediated activation of both the adenovirus E2 and cellular hsp70 promoters. CREG also antagonizes E1A-mediated transformation, as expression of CREG reduces the efficiency with which E1A and the oncogene ras cooperate to transform primary cells. Binding sites for E2F, a key transcriptional regulator of cell cycle progression, were found to be required for repression of the adenovirus E2 promoter by CREG, and CREG was shown to inhibit activation by E2F. Since both the adenovirus E1A protein and transcriptional activation by E2F function to promote cellular proliferation, the results presented here suggest that CREG activity may contribute to the transcriptional control of cell growth and differentiation.

TAFII-independent activation mediated by human TBP in the presence of the positive cofactor PC4

TFIID is a multiprotein complex comprised of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and an array of TBP-associated factors (TAFIIs). Whereas TBP is sufficient for basal transcription in conjunction with other general transcription factors and RNA polymerase II, TAFIIs are additionally required for activator-dependent transcription in mammalian cell-free transcription systems. However, recent in vivo studies carried out in yeast suggest that TAFIIs are not globally required for activator function. The discrepancy between in vivo yeast studies and in vitro mammalian cell-free systems remains to be resolved. In this study, we describe a mammalian cell-free transcription system reconstituted with only recombinant proteins and epitope-tagged multiprotein complexes. Transcriptional activation can be recapitulated in this highly purified in vitro transcription system in the absence of TAFIIs. This TBP-mediated activation is not induced by human mediator, another transcriptional coactivator complex potentially implicated in activator response. In contrast, general transcription factors TFIIH and TFIIA play a significant role in TBP-mediated activation, which can be detected in vitro with Gal4 fusion proteins containing various transcriptional activation domains. Our data, therefore, suggest that TFIIH and TFIIA can mediate activator function in the absence of TAFIIs.

The carboxy-terminal region of adenovirus E1A activates transcription through targeting of a C-terminal binding protein-histone deacetylase complex

Binding of the C-terminal binding protein, CtBP, to the adenovirus E1A moiety of a Gal4-E1A fusion protein abolishes conserved region (CR) 1-dependent transcription activation. In contrast, a non-promoter targeted E1A peptide, capable of binding CtBP, can induce transcription from the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) promoter. CtBP is shown here to bind the histone deacetylase HDAC1, suggesting that a promoter targeted CtBP-HDAC1 complex can silence transcription from the PCNA promoter through a deacetylation mechanism. Expression of the CtBP binding domain of E1A is sufficient to alleviate repression, possibly due to the displacement of the CtBP-HDAC1 complex from the promoter.

Amino acids 1-29 of the adenovirus serotypes 12 and 2 E1A proteins interact with rap30 (TF(II)F) and TBP in vitro

Early region 1A (E1A) gene products of adenoviruses (Ad) play an essential role in both productive infection and cellular transformation. Besides their function to induce the expression of all other adenoviral genes they modulate the expression of specific cellular genes to ensure an efficient viral reproduction. Gene regulatory functions of E1A proteins are mainly located in the conserved regions 1-3 (CRs) and in the non-conserved amino terminal end and are mediated via protein/protein interactions with cellular factors. We could show recently, that the E1A N-terminus (amino acids [aa] 1-29) of oncogenic Ad12 contains a unique 'trans'-activation domain. Here we demonstrate that this region binds to rap30/TF(II)F and to the TATA-box binding protein TBP in vitro. Mutation analyses suggest that binding to rap30 and 'trans'-activation are two independent functions as a mutant which failed to interact with rap30 was still able to induce gene expression with wildtype efficiency. Moreover loss of transcriptional activity does not correlate with a loss of TBP binding suggesting that this association is not necessary for the N-terminal 'trans'-activating activity. Interestingly, aa 1-29 of Ad2 E1A binds also to rap30 indicating that this interaction might be a common feature of E1A proteins from different serotypes.

Induction of DNA synthesis and apoptosis by regulated inactivation of a temperature-sensitive retinoblastoma protein

The retinoblastoma protein, pRb, controls entry into the S phase of the cell cycle and acts as a tumor suppressor in many tissues. Re-introduction of pRb into tumor cells lacking this protein results in growth arrest, due in part to transcriptional repression of genes required for S phase. Several studies suggest that pRb may also be involved in terminal cell cycle exit as a result of the instigation of senescence or differentiation programs. To understand better these multiple growth-inhibitory properties of pRb, a temperature-sensitive mutant of pRb has been produced. This tspRb induces G1 arrest and morphological changes efficiently at the permissive temperature of 32.5 degrees C, but is weakly functional at 37 degrees C. Consistent with this, tspRb is compromised in nuclear association and E2F regulation at the non-permissive temperature, but regains these properties at 32.5 degrees C. Serial activation and inactivation of tspRb in SAOS-2 cells does not allow proliferation, but rather leads to apoptotic cell death. Transient activation of pRb may kill tumor cells by establishing a conflict between persistent proliferation-inhibitory signals and renewed deregulation of pRb targets such as E2F, and may thus be a more potent means of eliminating these cells than through simple re-introduction of the tumor suppressor gene.

Viral transactivating proteins

Many viruses utilize the cellular transcription apparatus to express their genomes, and they encode transcriptional regulatory proteins that modulate the process. Here we review the current understanding of three viral regulatory proteins. The adenovirus E1A protein acts within the nucleus to regulate transcription through its ability to bind to other proteins. The herpes simplex type 1 virus VP16 protein acts within the nucleus to control transcription by binding to DNA in conjunction with cellular proteins. The human T-cell leukemia virus Tax protein influences transcription through interactions with cellular proteins in the nucleus as well as the cytoplasm.

Involvement of negative cofactor NC2 in active repression by zinc finger-homeodomain transcription factor AREB6

The transcription factor AREB6 contains a homeodomain flanked by two clusters of Krüppel type C2H2 zinc fingers. AREB6 binds to the E-box consensus sequence, CACCTGT, through either the N- or the C-terminal zinc finger cluster. To gain insights into the molecular mechanism by which AREB6 activates and represses gene expression, we analyzed the domain structure of AREB6 in the context of a heterologous DNA-binding domain by transient-transfection assays. The C-terminal region spanning amino acids 1011 to 1124 was identified as a conventional acidic activation domain. The region containing amino acids 754 to 901, which was identified as a repression domain, consists of 40% hydrophobic amino acids displaying no sequence similarities to other known repression domains. This region repressed transcription in vitro in a HeLa nuclear extract but not in reconstituted transcription systems consisting of transcription factor IID (TFIID), TFIIB, TFIIE, TFIIH/F, and RNA polymerase II. The addition of recombinant negative cofactor NC2 (NC2alpha/DRAP1 and NC2beta/Dr1) to the reconstituted transcription system restored the activity of the AREB6 repression domain. We further demonstrated interactions between the AREB6 repression domain and NC2alpha in yeast two-hybrid assay. Our findings suggest a mechanism of transcriptional repression that is mediated by the general cofactor NC2.

Functional antagonism between RNA polymerase II holoenzyme and global negative regulator NC2 in vivo

Activation of eukaryotic class II gene expression involves the formation of a transcription initiation complex that includes RNA polymerase II, general transcription factors, and SRB components of the holoenzyme. Negative regulators of transcription have been described, but it is not clear whether any are general repressors of class II genes in vivo. We reasoned that defects in truly global negative regulators should compensate for deficiencies in SRB4 because SRB4 plays a positive role in holoenzyme function. Genetic experiments reveal that this is indeed the case: a defect in the yeast homologue of the human negative regulator NC2 (Dr1 x DRAP1) suppresses a mutation in SRB4. Global defects in mRNA synthesis caused by the defective yeast holoenzyme are alleviated by the NC2 suppressing mutation in vivo, indicating that yeast NC2 is a global negative regulator of class II transcription. These results imply that relief from repression at class II promoters is a general feature of gene activation in vivo.

Functional dissection of a human Dr1-DRAP1 repressor complex

The heterotetrameric Dr1-DRAP1 transcriptional repressor complex was functionally dissected. Dr1 was found to contain two domains required for repression of transcription. The tethering domain interacts with the TATA box binding protein and directs the repressor complex to the promoter. This tethering domain can be replaced by a domain conferring sequence-specific recognition to the repressor complex. In the absence of the tethering domain, Dr1 interacts with its corepressor DRAP1, but this interaction is not functional. The enhancement of Dr1-mediated repression of transcription by DRAP1 requires the tethering domain. The second domain of Dr1 is the repression domain, which is glutamine-alanine rich. A 65-amino-acid polypeptide containing the repression domain fused to the Ga14 DNA binding domain repressed transcription when directed to TATA-containing and TATA-less promoters. This repression domain was also found to functionally and directly interact with the TATA box binding protein.

Adenovirus E1A specifically blocks SWI/SNF-dependent transcriptional activation

Expression of the adenovirus E1A243 oncoprotein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae produces a slow-growth phenotype with accumulation of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. This effect is due to the N-terminal and CR1 domains of E1A243, which in rodent cells are involved in triggering cellular transformation and also in binding to the cellular transcriptional coactivator p300. A genetic screen was undertaken to identify genes required for the function of E1A243 in S. cerevisiae. This screen identified SNF12, a gene encoding the 73-kDa subunit of the SWI/SNF transcriptional regulatory complex. Mutation of genes encoding known members of the SWI/SNF complex also led to loss of E1A function, suggesting that the SWI/SNF complex is a target of E1A243. Moreover, expression of E1A in wild-type cells specifically blocked transcriptional activation of the INO1 and SUC2 genes, whose activation pathways are distinct but have a common requirement for the SWI/SNF complex. These data demonstrate a specific functional interaction between E1A and the SWI/SNF complex and suggest that a similar interaction takes place in rodent and human cells.

Protein-protein interaction between the transcriptional repressor E4BP4 and the TBP-binding protein Dr1

We have previously mapped a repression domain from the active transcriptional repressor E4BP4 to a 65 amino acid segment near the C-terminus of the polypeptide. Here we show that the E4BP4 repression domain interacts specifically with the TBP binding repressor protein Dr1. Mutants that affect the ability of E4BP4 to bring about transcriptional repression are also deficient in their binding of Dr1. The results are discussed in the light of evidence for squelching of a 'global' repressor by a DNA binding defective E4BP4 mutant.

Interaction of the human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 tax transactivator with transcription factor IIA

The Tax protein of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) is a 40-kDa transcriptional activator which is critical for HTLV-1 gene regulation and virus-induced cellular transformation. Tax is localized to the DNA through its interaction with the site-specific activators cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein, NF-kappaB, and serum response factor. It has been suggested that the recruitment of Tax to the DNA positions Tax for interaction with the basal transcriptional machinery. On the basis of several independent assays, we now report a physical and functional interaction between Tax and the transcription factor, TFIIA. First, Tax was found to interact with the 35-kDa (alpha) subunit of TFIIA in the yeast two-hybrid interaction system. Importantly, two previously characterized mutants with point mutations in Tax, M32 (Y196A, K197S) and M41 (H287A, P288S), which were shown to be defective in Tax-activated transcription were unable to interact with TFIIA in this assay. Second, a glutathione-S-transferase (GST) affinity-binding assay showed that the interaction of holo-TFIIA with GST-Tax was 20-fold higher than that observed with either the GST-Tax M32 activation mutant or the GST control. Third, a coimmunoprecipitation assay showed that in HTLV-1-infected human T lymphocytes, Tax and TFIIA were associated. Finally, TFIIA facilitates Tax transactivation in vitro and in vivo. In vitro transcription studies showed reduced levels of Tax-activated transcription in cell extracts depleted of TFIIA. In addition, transfection of human T lymphocytes with TFIIA expression vectors enhanced Tax-activated transcription of an HTLV-1 long terminal repeat-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter construct. Our study suggests that the interaction of Tax with the transcription factor TFIIA may play a role in Tax-mediated transcriptional activation.

CREB binding protein acts synergistically with steroid receptor coactivator-1 to enhance steroid receptor-dependent transcription

Steroid receptors are ligand-regulated transcription factors that require coactivators for efficient activation of target gene expression. The binding protein of cAMP response element binding protein (CBP) appears to be a promiscuous coactivator for an increasing number of transcription factors and the ability of CBP to modulate estrogen receptor (ER)- and progesterone receptor (PR)-dependent transcription was therefore examined. Ectopic expression of CBP or the related coactivator, p300, enhanced ER transcriptional activity by up to 10-fold in a receptor- and DNA-dependent manner. Consistent with this, the 12S E1A adenoviral protein, which binds to and inactivates CBP, inhibited ER transcriptional activity, and exogenous CBP was able to partially overcome this effect. Furthermore, CBP was able to partially reverse the ability of active ER to squelch PR-dependent transcription, indicating that CBP is a common coactivator for both receptors and that CBP is limiting within these cells. To date, the only other coactivator able to significantly stimulate receptor-dependent transcription is steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1). Coexpression of CBP and SRC-1 stimulated ER and PR transcriptional activity in a synergistic manner and indicated that these two coactivators are not functional homologues. Taken together, these data suggest that both CBP and SRC-1 may function in a common pathway to efficiently activate target gene expression.

A negative cofactor containing Dr1/p19 modulates transcription with TFIIA in a promoter-specific fashion

An activity that modulated the relative levels of transcription from the adenovirus major late promoter (MLP), and the immunoglobulin heavy chain mu promoter (mu) was purified as a 90-kDa factor. This factor is suggested to be a heterotetramer of two subunits: a 20-kDa polypeptide identical to the previously described Dr1/p19 and a novel 30-kDa polypeptide. The Dr1/p19 protein has been characterized as a repressor of transcription, and the 30-kDa protein is related to a recently identified yeast gene proposed to encode a repressor of transcription. The 90-kDa factor forms a complex with TATA-binding protein on DNA and at high concentrations of both factors protects over a 150-base pair region around the promoter from DNase I cleavage. The conformation of this complex as assayed by footprinting analysis is altered by the transcription factor TFIIA on the MLP but not on the mu promoter. Similarly, TFIIA reverses the repression of transcription by the 90-kDa factor on the MLP but not on the mu promoter. Thus, the interactions of TATA-binding protein, TFIIA, and the 90-kDa factor are promoter-specific.

Interaction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat with a unique site of TFIID inhibits negative cofactor Dr1 and stabilizes the TFIID-TFIIA complex

We have previously reported the direct physical interaction between the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type I Tat protein and the basal transcription factor TBP/TFIID. Affinity chromatography demonstrated that wild-type Tat, but not a transactivation mutant of Tat, was capable of depleting TBP/TFIID from cell extracts. These experiments represented the first demonstration of a basal transcription factor that binds, in an activation-dependent manner, to Tat. We now report that the Tat-TBP interaction can be detected in HIV type 1-infected cells. The domain of TBP interacting with Tat has been mapped from amino acids 163 to 196 by using deletion and site-specific mutants of TBP. This domain of TBP, which includes the HI and S2 domains, is distinct from the H2 binding site for other activator proteins, such as E1A. The interaction of Tat with TFIID regulates the binding of accessory proteins to TFIID. Tat stabilizes the interaction of TFIID with TFIIA in a gel shift assay. In addition, Tat competes for Dr1 interaction with TBP. Our results suggest that the basal transcription factor TBP/TFIID represents an important regulatory molecule in HIV transcription.

The CtBP binding domain in the adenovirus E1A protein controls CR1-dependent transactivation

The adenovirus E1A-243R protein has the ability to force a resting cell into uncontrolled proliferation by modulating the activity of key targets in cell cycle control. Most of these regulatory mechanisms are dependent on activities mapping to conserved region 1 (CR1) and the non-conserved N-terminal region of E1A. We have previously shown that CR1 functions as a very patent transactivator when it is tethered to a promoter through a heterologous DNA binding domain. However, artificial DNA binding was not sufficient to convert full-length E1A-243R to a transactivator. Thus, an additional function(s) of the E1A-243R protein modulates the effect of CR1 in transcription regulation. Here we demonstrate that a 44 amino acid region at the extreme C-terminus of ElA inhibited transactivation by a Gal4-CR1 fusion protein. Inhibition correlated with binding of the nuclear 48 kDa C-terminal binding protein (CtBP), which has been implicated in E1A-mediated suppression of the metastazing potential of tumour cells. This might suggest that CtBP binding can regulate E1A-mediated transformation by modulating CR1-dependent control of transcription.

A mechanism for repression of class II gene transcription through specific binding of NC2 to TBP-promoter complexes via heterodimeric histone fold domains

Negative co-factor 2 (NC2) regulates transcription of the class II genes through binding to TFIID and inhibition of pre-initiation complex formation. We have isolated and cloned NC2, and investigated the molecular mechanism underlying repression of transcription. NC2 consists of two subunits, termed NC2alpha and NC2beta, the latter of which is identical to Dr1. The NC2 subunits dimerize and bind to TATA binding protein (TBP)-promoter complexes via histone fold domains of the H2A-H2B type. Repression of basal transcription requires the histone fold and carboxy-terminal domains of the NC2 subunits. Several mechanisms probably contribute to transcriptional repression. Binding of NC2 inhibits association of TFIIB with TBP-promoter complexes. NC2 binds directly to DNA, and binding of NC2 to TBP-promoter complexes affects the conformation of DNA, which could be one cause for the inhibition of TFIIB. In addition, multimerization of repressor-TBP complexes on DNA might inhibit the assembly of the pre-initiation complex. We suggest that binding of the repressor to TRP-promoter complexes establishes a mechanism that controls the rate of transcription by RNA polymerase II.

Human cytomegalovirus immediate-early 2 (IE2) protein can transactivate the human hsp70 promoter by alleviation of Dr1-mediated repression

The immediate-early 1 and 2 (IE1 and IE2, respectively) proteins of human cytomegalovirus are known transcription factors, which regulate the expression of viral and cellular genes. Transcriptional activation by IE2 is dependent on the presence of a TATA motif in target promoters, and IE2 can interact directly with the TATA-binding protein (TBP) component of TFIID. TBP is known to be the target for transcriptional repression by the cellular Dr1 protein, and this factor has been shown to repress expression from the hsp70 promoter in vivo. Since this promoter is up-regulated by IE2, we asked whether the effects of Dr1 can be overcome by IE2. We report here that IE2 can overcome Dr1-mediated repression of the hsp70 promoter in vivo and that IE2 can interact with Dr1 in vivo and in vitro. We also demonstrate a previously unreported activity of Dr1, inhibition of DNA binding by TBP, and show that IE2 is able to overcome this inhibition in vitro, suggesting a mechanism for the TATA dependency of IE2-mediated trans activation.

Wild-type and transactivation-defective mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat protein bind human TATA-binding protein in vitro

SUMMARY

Tat regulates human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gene expression by increasing both the rate of transcription initiation and the efficiency of transcription elongation. The ability of Tat to facilitate HIV-1 transcription preinitiation complex formation suggests that components of the basal transcriptional machinery may be targeted by Tat. Previous studies have demonstrated that Tat interacts directly with the human TATA-binding protein (TBP) and specific TBP-associated factors (TAFS) that comprise the TFIID complex. Here, in vitro glutathione S-transferase protein binding assays containing fully functional or transactivation-defective mutant Tat proteins have been used to investigate the functional significance of the direct interaction between Tat and TBP relative to Tat transactivation. Results demonstrate that full-length Tat, as well as the activation domain of Tat alone, binds human TBP in vitro. Site-directed mutations within the activation domain of Tat (C22G and P18IS) that abrogate transactivation by Tat in vivo fail to inhibit Tat-TBP binding. Full-length Tat, the activation domain of Tat alone, and a transactivation-defective mutant of Tat that lacks N-terminal amino acid residues 2-36 bind with equal efficiencies to TBP provided that the H1 alpha helical domain that maps to amino acids 167-220 within the highly conserved carboxyl terminus of TBP is maintained. These data indicate that an activity mapped within the activation domain of Tat, which is distinct from Tat-TBP binding. is required for transactivation by Tat.

Requirement of a corepressor for Dr1-mediated repression of transcription

A Dr1-associated polypeptide (DRAP1) was isolated from HeLa cells and found to function as a corepressor of transcription. Corepressor function requires an interaction between DRAP1 and Dr1. Heterodimer formation was dependent on a histone fold motif present at the amino terminus of both polypeptides. Association of DRAP1 with Dr1 results in higher stability of the Dr1-TBP-TATA motif complex and precluded the entry of TFIIA and/or TFIIB to preinitiation complexes. DRAP1 was found to be expressed in all tissues analyzed with higher levels in tissues with a low mitotic index. Analysis of DRAP1 in the developing brain of rat demonstrated undetectable levels of DRAP1 in actively dividing cells but high levels of DRAP1 expression in differentiated non dividing cells. Dr1 was immunodetected in all cells analyzed. A model for DRAP1-dependent, Dr1-mediated repression of transcription is proposed.

Adenovirus E1A activates cyclin A gene transcription in the absence of growth factors through interaction with p107

Using the infection of quiescent human fibroblasts with adenovirus type 5 and various deletion mutants, we show that E1A can stimulate transcription of the cyclin A gene in the absence of exogenous growth factors. Required for this activity is conserved region 2 (CR2), while both the N-terminal part of E1A and CR1 are dispensable. This indicates that activation of cyclin A gene expression requires the binding of E1A to p107, while binding to either pRB or p300 is not involved in transcriptional activation. We demonstrate that p107 represses the cyclin A promoter through its cell cycle-regulatory E2F binding site and that 12S E1A can activate the cyclin A promoter, essentially by counteracting its repression by p107. Since Cr2 is required for cell transformation, transcriptional activation of the cyclin A gene by E1A appears to be important for its capacity to override control of cellular growth.

The major transcriptional transactivation domain of simian virus 40 large T antigen associates nonconcurrently with multiple components of the transcriptional preinitiation complex

Simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen (Tag) is a promiscuous transcriptional transactivator; however, its mechanism of transactivation remains unknown. Recent studies have suggested the possible involvement of protein-protein interactions with TBP, the TATA box-binding protein of TFIID, and TEF-1, an enhancer-binding factor. We show here that (i) the Tag domain containing amino acids 133 to 249 directly interacts with the general transcription factor TFIIB, the activator protein Sp1, and the 140-kDa subunit of RNA polymerase II, as well as with TBP and TEF-1; (ii) these interactions can also occur when these transcription factors are present in their functional states in cellular extracts; (iii) binding of Tag to TBP is eliminated by preincubation of TBP either at 48 degrees C or with the adenovirus 13S E1a protein; (iv) this domain of Tag cannot bind concurrently to more than one of these transcription factors; and (v) the substitution of Tag amino acid residues 173 and 174 inactivates the ability of this Tag domain both to associate with any of these transcription factors and to transactivate the SV40 late promoter. Thus, we conclude that SV40 Tag probably does not transactivate via the concurrent interaction with multiple components of the preinitiation complex. Rather, we hypothesize that transactivation by Tag may primarily occur by removing or preventing the binding of factors that inhibit the formation of preinitiation complexes.

Adenovirus E1A243 disrupts the ATF/CREB-YY1 complex at the mouse c-fos promoter

The adenovirus E1A243 protein can activate transcription of the mouse c-fos gene in a manner that depends on treatment of cells with inducers or analogs of cyclic AMP (cAMP). Activation requires conserved region 1 and the N-terminal domain of E1A243 and is mediated by a 22-bp E1A response element containing a cAMP response element (CRE) at -67 and a binding site for transcription factor YY1 at -54. In the absence of E1A243, YY1 represses CRE-dependent transcription of c-fos by physically interacting with ATF/CREB proteins bound to the -67 CRE. Here we present evidence that expression of E1A243 leads to relief of YY1-mediated repression by a disruption of the ATF/CREB-YY1 complex. Addition of E1A243 to in vitro binding assays prevented binding of ATF-2 to glutathione S-transferase-YY1. Similarly, expression of E1A243 in HeLa cells prevented the association of a YY1-VP16 fusion protein with endogenous ATF/CREB proteins bound to the -67 CRE of a transfected c-fosCAT reporter plasmid. In each case, the N-terminal domain of E1A243, which mediates a direct interaction with YY1, was responsible for disruption of the ATF/CREB-YY1 complex. On the basis of these and previously published results, we present a model for the synergistic transcriptional activation of the c-fos gene by E1A243 and cAMP.

Adenovirus E1A functions as a cofactor for retinoic acid receptor beta (RAR beta) through direct interaction with RAR beta

Transcription regulation by DNA-bound activators is thought to be mediated by a direct interaction between these proteins and TATA-binding protein (TBP), TFIIB, or TBP-associated factors, although occasionally cofactors or adapters are required. For ligand-induced activation by the retinoic acid receptor-retinoid X receptor (RAR-RXR) heterodimer, the RAR beta 2 promoter is dependent on the presence of E1A or E1A-like activity, since this promoter is activated by retinoic acid only in cells expressing such proteins. The mechanism underlying this E1A requirement is largely unknown. We now show that direct interaction between RAR and E1A is a requirement for retinoic acid-induced RAR beta 2 activation. The activity of the hormone-dependent activation function 2 (AF-2) of RAR beta is upregulated by E1A, and an interaction between this region and E1A was observed, but not with AF-1 or AF-2 of RXR alpha. This interaction is dependent on conserved region III (CRIII), the 13S mRNA-specific region of E1A. Deletion analysis within this region indicated that the complete CRIII is needed for activation. The putative zinc finger region is crucial, probably as a consequence of interaction with TBP. Furthermore, the region surrounding amino acid 178, partially overlapping with the TBP binding region, is involved in both binding to and activation by AF-2. We propose that E1A functions as a cofactor by interacting with both TBP and RAR, thereby stabilizing the preinitiation complex.

Transcription factor TFIID is a direct functional target of the adenovirus E1A transcription-repression domain

The 243-amino acid adenovirus E1A oncoprotein both positively and negatively modulates the expression of cellular genes involved in the regulation of cell growth. The E1A transcription repression function appears to be linked with its ability to induce cellular DNA synthesis, cell proliferation, and cell transformation, as well as to inhibit cell differentiation. The mechanism by which E1A represses the transcription of various promoters has proven enigmatic. Here we provide several lines of evidence that the "TATA-box" binding protein (TBP) component of transcription factor TFIID is a cellular target of the E1A repression function encoded within the E1A N-terminal 80 amino acids. (i) The E1A N-terminal 80 amino acids [E1A-(1-80)protein] efficiently represses basal transcription from TATA-containing core promoters in vitro. (ii) TBP reverses completely E1A repression in vitro. (iii) TBP restores transcriptional activity to E1A-(1-80) protein affinity-depleted nuclear extracts. (iv) The N-terminal repression domain of E1A interacts directly and specifically with TBP in vitro. These results may help explain how E1A represses a set of genes that lack common upstream promoter elements.

Transcriptional repression by human adenovirus E1A N terminus/conserved domain 1 polypeptides in vivo and in vitro in the absence of protein synthesis

The human adenovirus E1A 243R protein (243 residues) transcriptionally represses a set of cellular genes that regulate cellular growth and differentiation. We describe two lines of evidence that E1A repression does not require cellular protein synthesis but instead involves direct interaction with a cellular protein(s). First, E1A 243R protein represses an E1A-repressible promoter in the presence of inhibitors of protein synthesis, as shown by cell microinjection-in situ hybridization. Second, E1A 243R protein strongly represses transcription in vitro from promoters of the E1A-repressible genes, human collagenase, and rat insulin type II. Repression in vitro is promoter-specific, and an E1A polypeptide containing only the N-terminal 80 residues is sufficient for strong repression both in vivo and in vitro. By use of a series of E1A 1-80 deletion proteins, the E1A repression function was found to require two E1A sequence elements, one within the nonconserved E1A N terminus, and the second within a portion of conserved region 1 (40-80). These domains have been reported to possess binding sites for several cellular transcription regulators, including p300, Dr1, YY1, and the TBP subunit of TFIID. The in vitro transcription-repression system described here provides a powerful tool for the further analysis of molecular mechanism and the possible role of these cellular factors.