Transplantation tolerance: fooling mother nature

Immunosuppressive drug therapy

The first successful kidney transplantation between monozygotic identical twins did not require any immunosuppressive drugs. Clinical application of azathioprine and glucocorticosteroids allowed the transfer of organs between genetically disparate donors and recipients. Transplantation is now the standard of care, a life-saving procedure for patients with failed organs. Progress in our understanding of the immunobiology of rejection has been translated to the development of immunosuppressive agents targeting T cells, B cells, plasma cells, costimulatory signals, complement products, and antidonor antibodies. Modern immunopharmacologic interventions have contributed to the clinical success observed following transplantation but challenges remain in personalizing immunosuppressive therapy.

Rejection and regulation: a tight balance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Achieving allograft tolerance is the holy grail of transplantation. However, tolerance and rejection are two extreme ends of a scale that can be tipped in either direction. We review the novel effector and regulatory mechanisms involved and factors that tip the balance in favor of rejection or regulation.

RECENT FINDINGS

It is increasingly recognized that established T-cell phenotypes could change their commitments. New data point to the plasticity of Th17 cells in vivo with a reciprocal balance of Th17 cells and regulatory T cells (Tregs) driven by the local cytokine environment. Treg-cell profiles have been linked to acute and chronic allograft outcomes, and emerging data also indicate a novel role of a regulatory B-cell population. Current research efforts are looking into factors that tip the balance toward allograft tolerance by targeting cytokines, novel costimulatory pathways such as T-cell immunoglobulin mucin molecules, and components of innate immunity, particularly dendritic cells.

SUMMARY

The balance of effector and regulatory mechanisms contributing to allograft outcome is very complex. It is likely that targeting multiple pathways will be required to achieve tolerance. Further studies are warranted to define this balance and identify optimal combination of therapeutic interventions.

Stem cell transplantation in living donor renal transplantation for minimization of immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

We present our experience of living-donor renal transplantation (LDRT) using pretransplant stem cell transplantation (SCT) where we have successfully achieved minimization of immunosuppression.

METHODS

Nine hundred sixteen patients underwent LDRT between 2007 and 2011: 606 under tolerance induction protocol (TIP) and 310 with our usual triple immunosuppression of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), mycofenolate sodium (MMF), and prednisone (controls). The test group (TIP) was stratified into group 1, 1 haplomatch or greater (n=392), group 3, less than 1 haplomatch (n=214); controls were similarly stratified to group 2, 1 haplomatch or greater (n=179) and group 4, less than 1 haplomatch (n=131). The TIP consisted of donor-specific transfusion, adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and nonmyeloablative conditioning with total lymphoid irradiation, cyclophosphamide, and rabbit-antithymocyte globulin. Posttransplant IS consisted of prednisone, CNI, or MMF, all in low doses.

RESULTS

Four-year patient survival was 93.5%, 90.7%, 88.7%, and 82.7% in groups 1 through 4, respectively, and death-censored 4-year allograft survival was 94.8%, 95.4%, 94.5%, and 74.6%, respectively. Mean serum creatinine (mg/dL) for groups 1 through 4, respectively, at 4 years was 1.26, 1.57, 1.29, and 2.1. The number of rejection episodes was highest in group 4 and lowest in group 1. Minimization of IS was successfully achieved in 82.9% patients in group 1 and in 61.7% patients in group 3, whereas no minimization in groups 2 and 4. Stem cell transplantations were safe.

CONCLUSION

Stem cell transplantation is effective in IS minimization in LDRT resulting in good graft function and patient and graft survival at 4 years.

The natural history of clinical operational tolerance after kidney transplantation through twenty-seven cases

We report here on a European cohort of 27 kidney transplant recipients displaying operational tolerance, compared to two cohorts of matched kidney transplant recipients under immunosuppression and patients who stopped immunosuppressive drugs and presented with rejection. We report that a lower proportion of operationally tolerant patients received induction therapy (52% without induction therapy vs. 78.3%[p = 0.0455] and 96.7%[p = 0.0001], respectively), a difference likely due to the higher proportion (18.5%) of HLA matched recipients in the tolerant cohort. These patients were also significantly older at the time of transplantation (p = 0.0211) and immunosuppression withdrawal (p = 0.0002) than recipients who rejected their graft after weaning. Finally, these patients were at lower risk of infectious disease. Among the 27 patients defined as operationally tolerant at the time of inclusion, 19 still display stable graft function (mean 9 ± 4 years after transplantation) whereas 30% presented slow deterioration of graft function. Six of these patients tested positive for pre-graft anti-HLA antibodies. Biopsy histology studies revealed an active immunologically driven mechanism for half of them, associated with DSA in the absence of C4d. This study suggests that operational tolerance can persist as a robust phenomenon, although eventual graft loss does occur in some patients, particularly in the setting of donor-specific alloantibody.

Biomarkers to discern transplantation tolerance after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Although it is commonly accepted that allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients develop transplantation tolerance and can quickly discontinue all immunosuppressive drugs, existing data does not support this concept. Most patients will require a prolonged duration of immunosuppression, lasting commonly several years. This has even greater importance, as the majority of transplants are now performed utilizing peripheral blood mobilized stem cells, which are associated with an increased risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) and prolonged duration of immunosuppression. Despite these challenges, the approach to liberation from immunosuppression after HCT is empiric, and biomarkers of operational tolerance after HCT are lacking. Conversely, investigators in solid organ allografting have begun to examine tolerance associated gene expression in renal and hepatic allograft recipients. Significant challenges in the design and interpretation of these studies potentially limit comparisons. However, a relatively unified model is beginning to emerge, which largely recapitulates previously established mechanisms of immune tolerance. This evidence supports a state of immune quiescence with reduced expression of costimulation and immune response genes, and upregulation of cell cycle control genes. Data indirectly supports the importance of tumor growth factor (TGF)-beta, supports the role of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells, and offers new insights into the role of natural killer (NK) cells. Distinct in hepatic allograft tolerance, emerging evidence highlights the importance of gammadeltaT cells, and selection of the Vgammadelta1+ subtype among the gammadeltaT cell population. The deficiencies in the current understanding of transplantation tolerance after HCT, as well as the inadequacies evident in the current empiric approach to immunosuppressive medication (IS) management after HCT make clear the rationale for investigation aimed at elucidating tolerance associated biomarkers after HCT.

Alloantigen-induced regulatory CD8+CD103+ T cells

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) appear of great importance in the balance between alloreactivity and tolerance and subsets of both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells have been recognized to function as regulatory T cells after allogenic transplantation. Among the CD8(+) T-cell subsets, the CD103(+) cells were most recently identified as regulatory. In this review, we describe their phenotypical and functional properties, as well as their relevance for the alloimmune response in vivo. These CD8(+)CD103(+) Tregs are generated within mixed lymphocyte cultures (MLCs) and are elevated by additional transforming growth factor-beta. Interestingly, myeloid dendritic cells are the responsible cell type for induction of CD103(+) Tregs. Allostimulated CD8(+)CD103(+) Tregs display an antigen-experienced effector phenotype with limited effector functions such as cytotoxicity and interferon-gamma production and show a reduced proliferation capacity after restimulation. Beside this anergic phenotype, CD8(+)CD103(+) Tregs are able to suppress alloreactive effector T cells. Through intracellular cytokine staining and transwell assays, we showed that the mechanism of suppression is cytokine independent, but close cell-cell contact is required for suppression.

Transplantation tolerance in pediatric recipients: lessons and challenges

Clinical transplantation tolerance has remained an elusive goal in the 50 yr since it was first described in experimental animals. Greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms responsible for allorecognition have allowed for the development of promising immunosuppressive strategies that may bring us closer to reproducible induction of tolerance; consideration of past successes and failures from both clinical and basic science is required to define future challenges facing this field. This article reviews mechanisms of self and transplantation tolerance, translation of basic science research to clinical protocols in animals and human beings, the changing role of immunosuppression, complications following tolerance induction and controversies surrounding the choice of patients for tolerance trials with a focus on issues relevant to pediatric patients. The role of the Immune Tolerance Network is discussed along with realistic goals for tolerance induction in human beings over the next decade.

Clinical transplantation tolerance: The promise and challenges

Organ transplantation is now well established as a preferred option for the treatment of end-stage organ failure. However, there is a severe shortage of donor organs and continued loss of a significant number of organ grafts due to chronic allograft dysfunction. Induction of tolerance of a transplant recipient toward their foreign organ graft, therefore, remains the "Holy Grail" of transplantation immunobiologists. Recently, clinical trials to explore pilot tolerance protocols in humans have been initiated. Defining the ideal strategy(ies) and the role of immunosuppressive drugs, developing tolerance assay(s), and enhancing cooperation between transplant professionals, industry, and the government are some of the challenges to achieving clinical transplantation tolerance. This article reviews the promise and the challenges of achieving clinical transplantation tolerance in human organ transplant recipients.

Development of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)

The field of BMT has entered a new phase based on insights into basic molecular and cellular biology. The mechanism of cure mediated by allogeneic HSCT is now believed to be at least partially mediated by cellular attack against tumor-associated antigens. Better understanding of these cellular targets and the means of targeting them specifically will allow a more precise application of cellular therapy than is currently possible. This in turn may make it possible to design therapies that are increasingly selective without the collateral toxicities of GVHD, infection, and direct organ damage that currently are the limiting features of allogeneic HSCT as practiced until recently. However, it remains a challenge to demonstrate that disease-control using reduced intensity preparative regimens is at least comparable to that achieved by traditional myeloablative HSCT. This will require carefully controlled studies in each the major diseases that have shown sensitivity to the immune-mediated effects of HSCT. The chapters below will highlight progress towards the goals of elucidating the role of NST.

Tracking the immunoregulatory mechanisms active during allograft tolerance

Immunoregulatory mechanisms dependent on regulatory CD4+ T cells are believed to be critical in the maintenance of peripheral tolerance to allografts. However, a detailed characterization of the effects of these regulatory T cells has been hampered by the absence of a simple means to track and study them. In this work we provide evidence that in a murine model of islet transplantation the interactions between alloaggressive and regulatory T cells can be studied in vitro and in vivo at the single-cell level. The observations made in both an in vitro coculture system and an in vivo CFSE-based adoptive transfer model indicate that lymphocytes from tolerant allograft recipients 1) proliferate weakly to donor strain allogeneic cells but vigorously to third-party strain cells; and 2) suppress the proliferation of naive syngeneic CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to donor tissue in a cell dose- and Ag-specific manner. These effects depend on the presence of CD4+CD25+ T cells and are neutralized by anti-CTLA4 mAb or rIL-2. The principal effect of anti-CTLA4 is directed against the naive, not regulatory, T cell population. These results can be replicated in vivo by transferring lymphocyte populations into transplant recipients, proving that the graft-protecting actions of regulatory T cells are blunted by a rise in the number of allodestructive T cells (pool size model) and depend on the presence of CD4+CD25+ T cells and the integrity of the CTLA4/B7 pathway.

Tolerance and chronic rejection

The most common cause of chronic allograft loss is an incompletely understood clinicopathological entity called chronic rejection (CR). Recent reports suggest an improvement in long-term renal allograft survival, although it is not clear from these data whether a true reduction of biopsy-proven CR has occurred. Although newer immunosuppressive medications have greatly reduced the incidence of acute rejection (AR) in the early post-transplantation period, the ideal therapy for both AR and CR would be to achieve a state of tolerance. By definition, such a state should allow for indefinite allograft survival, with no histopathological evidence of CR, despite immunocompetence in the host (i.e. without the need for chronic immunosuppression). Although several experimental studies are able to achieve tolerance, with clear improvement in allograft survival, detailed studies on graft function and morphology are often not included. This review will discuss possible ways that tolerance induction could lead to a CR-free state. General mechanisms of CR and transplantation tolerance induction are discussed as well as the difficulties in translating small animals studies into large animals and humans.

Transplantation tolerance: the concept and its applicability

Recent advances have enabled researchers to induce tolerance in animal transplant models. Although it has been relatively easy to do so in rodents, it has been much more difficult to translate such strategies into primates. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the alloimmune response has prompted the development of novel strategies that may obviate the need for immunosuppression in humans. Mechanisms of tolerance and promising new therapies, as well as the inherent difficulties in bringing them into clinical practice, are reviewed.